Forum
»
More General Categories
»
Misc.
» Official Misc Photography Crew, Part V "Do you even shoot?"
09-09-2018, 08:29 PM
#2731
Originally Posted By UrbexBrah⏩
jooci
Placing a preorder this week for the new Canon 70-200 2.8 IS III lens this wednesday
Misc photography crew
Chicago crew
Polski crew
Throw keys on bench to claim it crew
6'2" 193lbs crew
#MMGA
- LieutenantGains
- Registered User
-
- LieutenantGains
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2013
- Posts: 6,303
- Rep Power: 84,603
-
Quote
09-09-2018, 08:33 PM
#2732
Originally Posted By acrawlingchaos⏩
i would fix her skin tone…she looks super pale/ghost-like…clean the specks on the clothes
Did my first "wedding" recently. I was contacted last minute by someone that couldn't find a photographer short notice and or in their price range. I told them I had zero experience in wedding work, but told them I provide an inexpensive service in exchange for the experience. To be honest, I really had no idea what I was doing, and I don't know how wedding photographers deal with the stress.
Anyhow, these are photos from the session. Critique would be appreciated.
Anyhow, these are photos from the session. Critique would be appreciated.
first one, i would remove the tree leaves
your 2nd pic is the best one of them all
HOUSTON CREW | ASS CREW
REPS FOR THOSE WHO MAKE ME LAUGH
- SYST3M4T1C
- Registered User
-
- SYST3M4T1C
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Posts: 1,191
- Rep Power: 6,708
-
09-10-2018, 03:11 AM
#2733
I'm sure some of you guys shoot some video as well?
Magic Lantern has been succesfuly tested on a 5d mark IV!
They are just getting started though. Will be interesting to see how much they can get out of the mark IV.
https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic...on-5d-mark-iv/
For those of you who are unfamiliar with magic lantern; it is a software hack that you install on your camera and that unlocks the true capabilities of the camera.
Canon intentionally cripples the video capabilities of its photo cameras range to protect its expensive cinema camera range. To give you an example, the 5d mark III only features compressed full hd video, and yet with the magic lantern hack it is actually capable of raw 4k video. Enormous jump in resolution and image quality that is simply unlocked via software.
Magic Lantern has been succesfuly tested on a 5d mark IV!
They are just getting started though. Will be interesting to see how much they can get out of the mark IV.
https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic...on-5d-mark-iv/
For those of you who are unfamiliar with magic lantern; it is a software hack that you install on your camera and that unlocks the true capabilities of the camera.
Canon intentionally cripples the video capabilities of its photo cameras range to protect its expensive cinema camera range. To give you an example, the 5d mark III only features compressed full hd video, and yet with the magic lantern hack it is actually capable of raw 4k video. Enormous jump in resolution and image quality that is simply unlocked via software.
09-10-2018, 05:27 AM
#2734
Originally Posted By microspot⏩
will look into this. my wife has a mk IV, and i use it for short video edits/b roll occasionally.
I'm sure some of you guys shoot some video as well?
Magic Lantern has been succesfuly tested on a 5d mark IV!
They are just getting started though. Will be interesting to see how much they can get out of the mark IV.
https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic...on-5d-mark-iv/
For those of you who are unfamiliar with magic lantern; it is a software hack that you install on your camera and that unlocks the true capabilities of the camera.
Canon intentionally cripples the video capabilities of its photo cameras range to protect its expensive cinema camera range. To give you an example, the 5d mark III only features compressed full hd video, and yet with the magic lantern hack it is actually capable of raw 4k video. Enormous jump in resolution and image quality that is simply unlocked via software.
Magic Lantern has been succesfuly tested on a 5d mark IV!
They are just getting started though. Will be interesting to see how much they can get out of the mark IV.
https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic...on-5d-mark-iv/
For those of you who are unfamiliar with magic lantern; it is a software hack that you install on your camera and that unlocks the true capabilities of the camera.
Canon intentionally cripples the video capabilities of its photo cameras range to protect its expensive cinema camera range. To give you an example, the 5d mark III only features compressed full hd video, and yet with the magic lantern hack it is actually capable of raw 4k video. Enormous jump in resolution and image quality that is simply unlocked via software.
Pittsburgh
** KNEE DRAGGERS UNITE **
09-10-2018, 08:12 AM
#2735
Originally Posted By shanedawg⏩
I'd wait for the mark IV build to be thoroughly tested and stable before messing with it.
will look into this. my wife has a mk IV, and i use it for short video edits/b roll occasionally.
What they did with the mark III was awesome and stable, I got to try it, the jump in quality is insane.
Of course a lot of the interest with raw video is the same as jpeg vs raw when you shoot stills, how far you can grade it improves drastically.
They are plenty of mark III raw videos on youtube if you want to check them out.
A good example of the raw grading capabilities that Magic Lantern brought, good luck doing that with the original compressed hd video:
09-10-2018, 10:04 AM
#2736
Originally Posted By LieutenantGains⏩
What I am reading tho is the version 3 and version 2 are basically the same thing. Same glass, same elements, etc. What is the only difference is the coating having less ghosting and flare and the external being more of a true white.
jooci
Brahs…what should I do? Should I get the version 3 or the version 2? Will they still service the version 2 if something were to happen to it?
09-10-2018, 10:51 PM
#2737
A lot of great advice here for anyone interested in landscape photography. Always enjoy his videos. Makes me want to unplug from the mundane everyday stuff and get out there.
09-11-2018, 03:58 AM
#2738
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
nice will check it out. Too many tutorials out there these days, it's hard to separate the actual good informative ones from the ones just looking to get views and likes.
A lot of great advice here for anyone interested in landscape photography.
Guys as if the content-aware fill tool in photoshop was not impressive enough already, check out what is coming next, insanity!:
09-11-2018, 06:39 AM
#2739
Originally Posted By microspot⏩
It's aimed at beginners but he makes some really good points. The main message is what makes far more of a difference than the choice of camera is the weather, planning, putting in the effort to get up early and arrive at a location before sunrise or staying until after sunset. His point is the technical side of it, executing the shot isn't usually that difficult — the hard part is being there on time, dealing with the cold, long hikes, being out in the rain, etc. Saving money buying used gear and putting that money towards traveling to interesting locations.
nice will check it out. Too many tutorials out there these days, it's hard to separate the actual good informative ones from the ones just looking to get views and likes.
"Don't photograph images that are popular, photograph things that mean something to you. So if you enjoy hiking and the outdoors, go and take photos on a mountain trail. If you find peace and solitude in the woodland, go into the woods and try some photography in there. If you're a beach bum shoot seascapes. Do what feels good for you because there is more to photography than just getting the images — it's about the whole experience."
I think this is a really strong message which might seem like a no brainer but so many photographers will punish themselves trying to build up a catalog of work with shots in locations they don't really enjoy or explore various forms of photography they don't enjoy simply to make a living off it and over time they'll probably lose their interest in photography altogether.
09-11-2018, 09:52 AM
#2740
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
It's a good video, a nice overview of the whole process. Crazy all the weather apps he cross references, he goes out ready! Interesting info about the different low to high clouds and how they affect your picture. One thing where he is wrong though, is where he focuses on open scenes with no subjects, he goes to infinity and we know that is not optimal. Seems that he has the same philosophy as you for his post processing. His philosophy and approach like you discussed in your post is definitively good, interesting watch.
It's aimed at beginners but he makes some really good points.
09-13-2018, 12:28 AM
#2741
Originally Posted By microspot⏩
Just a heads up. It can often look amazing at first glance but when you examine it more closely, especially with a larger print, you can see where it's cloned those details.
nice will check it out. Too many tutorials out there these days, it's hard to separate the actual good informative ones from the ones just looking to get views and likes.
Guys as if the content-aware fill tool in photoshop was not impressive enough already, check out what is coming next, insanity!:
Guys as if the content-aware fill tool in photoshop was not impressive enough already, check out what is coming next, insanity!:
The photographer whose video I posted earlier shared this shot where the light changed while they were having dinner as a storm cleared and the only way to get the shot was from the window. A large tree at the bottom left of the frame was in the composition so he used the content aware fill tool to remove it. At a glance it looks like it nailed it. However if you look closer you can see it where it pulled the new content from. Look at the rocks. They're duplicated along with the light color in the trees nearby which could have been a reflection from the room. People will say it's fine to remove but not add elements but it is adding them because those rocks have been automatically cloned into the shot.
Not a big deal but it's good to be "aware" of this so you can go in and manually correct it.
9:30
09-13-2018, 12:52 AM
#2742
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
All fair points. And yeah it is clearly visible in your example.
Just a heads up. It can often look amazing at first glance but when you examine it more closely, especially with a larger print, you can see where it's cloned those details. Not a big deal but it's good to be "aware" of this so you can go in and manually correct it.
One thing that still impresses me today with the content aware fill is how well it handles gradients. This can be very difficult to stamp/heal out when what you want to get rid off something that sits in the middle of a gradation, whether it be the sky or a gradation caused by light fall off. The content aware matches the gradation perfectly.
09-13-2018, 06:17 AM
#2743
Originally Posted By microspot⏩
It's definitely a great tool. Like any automatic process you just need to keep an eye on it.
One thing that still impresses me today with the content aware fill is how well it handles gradients. This can be very difficult to stamp/heal out when what you want to get rid off something that sits in the middle of a gradation, whether it be the sky or a gradation caused by light fall off. The content aware matches the gradation perfectly.
Originally Posted By microspot⏩
Good point. Hyperfocal is a compromise — often a necessary compromise to get everything "acceptably sharp" but a compromise nonetheless. Unless the subject is a long way away and focusing on it is practically at hyperfocal distance you need to think about where you need maximum sharpness like if you're focusing on large rocks in the foreground that the viewer's eye will be immediately drawn to and in the distance is a cloudy sky with clouds that won't even be sharp due to a longer exposure and not magnified a great deal with an ultra wide lens you're obviously better off getting the rocks as sharp as possible.
One thing where he is wrong though, is where he focuses on open scenes with no subjects, he goes to infinity and we know that is not optimal.
Typed up a long post about tilt-shift lenses and focus stacking but this stuff is common knowledge these days so I won't clutter up the thread. I guess the most important thing is you're always thinking about what you're doing rather than blindly following guidelines.
Probably the main thing I've learned from experience is to keep it as simple as possible and once that shot is in the bag then aim to capture something more difficult. I attempted a large pano at sunrise once and completely screwed it up by trying to shoot too many frames in changing light and in the process learned a valuable lesson about over-complicating things. If you're at a waterfall on an overcast day for an hour and the light isn't changing and there's no one around you can shoot 100s of frames exposure blending, focus stacking, experimenting with different apertures and shutter speeds, higher ISO if foliage is moving, you name it. However when you've only got a couple of minutes to nail a shot in changing light if you don't keep it simple it'll probably end up full of fail.
09-15-2018, 01:55 PM
#2744
Film is basically 24 stills per second right? I wanted to share this because the filmmaking thread is dead. I started as a photographer before getting into film, but the same light painting applies. These are screenshots from a recent music video I photographed (cinematographer/director of photography). Using a Sony FS7 with Sigma ART lenses. Continuous (video) lighting was by Aputure 300D through a light dome for the key, and LED panels for edge.
Camera settings: Between f2-2.8, 4K, ISO 2000, shutter degrees is 172.8 (1/48 shutter speed).
Also used the camera's built-in ND filter even for the night scenes to keep the contrast levels controlled and not have the back tube lights blow out too much. Shot at night. The daylight scenes were shot during the day but was able to control the lighting to my liking using modifiers, 8x8 frame with a 1/4 silk and a reflector board in as well as the Aputure 300D for key.
Here's a timelapse of the BTS so you can see the setup:
https://www.instagram.com/p/BncoMtVnWwG/
Camera settings: Between f2-2.8, 4K, ISO 2000, shutter degrees is 172.8 (1/48 shutter speed).
Also used the camera's built-in ND filter even for the night scenes to keep the contrast levels controlled and not have the back tube lights blow out too much. Shot at night. The daylight scenes were shot during the day but was able to control the lighting to my liking using modifiers, 8x8 frame with a 1/4 silk and a reflector board in as well as the Aputure 300D for key.
Here's a timelapse of the BTS so you can see the setup:
https://www.instagram.com/p/BncoMtVnWwG/
*****OFFICIAL MISC PHOTOGRAPHY CREW*****
◄FILMM∆KERS CRW►
ϟ CHARGERS CREW ϟ
"You don't need God to know good people exist, but you need good people to know God exists."
-MarkA15
09-16-2018, 12:01 PM
#2745
Originally Posted By MarkA15⏩
Looks fantastic, very nice work! Colors, light and skin tones look very good.
Film is basically 24 stills per second right? I wanted to share this because the filmmaking thread is dead. I started as a photographer before getting into film, but the same light painting applies. These are screenshots from a recent music video I photographed (cinematographer/director of photography). Using a Sony FS7 with Sigma ART lenses. Continuous (video) lighting was by Aputure 300D through a light dome for the key, and LED panels for edge.
Originally Posted By MarkA15⏩
I was suprised with the 2000 iso but then I googled and realized it was the FS7 native iso.
Camera settings: Between f2-2.8, 4K, ISO 2000, shutter degrees is 172.8 (1/48 shutter speed).
How challenging was getting the shots in focus at those apertures? Everything stayed pretty still so it was alright?
Originally Posted By MarkA15⏩
Interesting but why? Why not simply close the aperture a bit? Was it to keep the DOF constant between the shots? I'd be interested to hear about the reasoning of using the NDs at night if you care to explain.
Also used the camera's built-in ND filter even for the night scenes to keep the contrast levels controlled and not have the back tube lights blow out too much.
Originally Posted By MarkA15⏩
Nice to see the bts and do post the video when it's released!
Shot at night. The daylight scenes were shot during the day but was able to control the lighting to my liking using modifiers, 8x8 frame with a 1/4 silk and a reflector board in as well as the Aputure 300D for key.
Here's a timelapse of the BTS so you can see the setup:
https://www.instagram.com/p/BncoMtVnWwG/
Here's a timelapse of the BTS so you can see the setup:
https://www.instagram.com/p/BncoMtVnWwG/
09-16-2018, 01:43 PM
#2746
Originally Posted By microspot⏩
The camera was moving forward and back (dolly in and out) and I had to manually focus the whole time. It was a bit challenging, especially as a single camera operator. Usually you would have a dedicated person just to manually focus. The other close up shots were stationary, no camera movement other than pan and tilt, so that was easier to keep in focus.
How challenging was getting the shots in focus at those apertures? Everything stayed pretty still so it was alright?
Interesting but why? Why not simply close the aperture a bit? Was it to keep the DOF constant between the shots? I'd be interested to hear about the reasoning of using the NDs at night if you care to explain.
Nice to see the bts and do post the video when it's released!
*****OFFICIAL MISC PHOTOGRAPHY CREW*****
◄FILMM∆KERS CRW►
ϟ CHARGERS CREW ϟ
"You don't need God to know good people exist, but you need good people to know God exists."
-MarkA15
09-17-2018, 02:13 AM
#2747
Fantastic work!
The subtle dolly move/camera moves and blurry foreground elements really polish the flower background shots. Nice set design as well.
The video starts strong with the back and forth between the flower wall shots and the back-lit sunset party. Flows nicely.
The changes of clothes to the red dress cut works very well.
It starts to get repetitive after that, but that is what happens when you only have the budget/time for two locations right?
Making an entire music video with only two locations must be quite a challenge.
And you did a great job on milking those 2 locations as much as possible with your change of framing, day/night, camera moves, slow mo and blurry foreground elements.
I hope your client appreciates the work you delivered because I bet it's much better than what his budget would typically get.
Again great work, appreciate the skills.
Another technical question out of curiosity; was the Aputure 300D strong enough to be used as a fill light on that back-lit sunset shot? Or did you have to use something else?
The subtle dolly move/camera moves and blurry foreground elements really polish the flower background shots. Nice set design as well.
The video starts strong with the back and forth between the flower wall shots and the back-lit sunset party. Flows nicely.
The changes of clothes to the red dress cut works very well.
It starts to get repetitive after that, but that is what happens when you only have the budget/time for two locations right?
Making an entire music video with only two locations must be quite a challenge.
And you did a great job on milking those 2 locations as much as possible with your change of framing, day/night, camera moves, slow mo and blurry foreground elements.
I hope your client appreciates the work you delivered because I bet it's much better than what his budget would typically get.
Again great work, appreciate the skills.
Another technical question out of curiosity; was the Aputure 300D strong enough to be used as a fill light on that back-lit sunset shot? Or did you have to use something else?
09-17-2018, 05:27 AM
#2748
Originally Posted By microspot⏩
Thank you! Yes, budget had a huge influence in the outcome of the video. They wanted a simple performance piece with minimal scenes. The director also edited the video. I just did the cinematography. My goal was to make something with a micro budget look like it was a big budget and exceed their expectations.
It starts to get repetitive after that, but that is what happens when you only have the budget/time for two locations right?
Making an entire music video with only two locations must be quite a challenge.
And you did a great job on milking those 2 locations as much as possible with your change of framing, day/night, camera moves, slow mo and blurry foreground elements.
I hope your client appreciates the work you delivered because I bet it's much better than what his budget would typically get.
Making an entire music video with only two locations must be quite a challenge.
And you did a great job on milking those 2 locations as much as possible with your change of framing, day/night, camera moves, slow mo and blurry foreground elements.
I hope your client appreciates the work you delivered because I bet it's much better than what his budget would typically get.
Another technical question out of curiosity; was the Aputure 300D strong enough to be used as a fill light on that back-lit sunset shot? Or did you have to use something else?
*****OFFICIAL MISC PHOTOGRAPHY CREW*****
◄FILMM∆KERS CRW►
ϟ CHARGERS CREW ϟ
"You don't need God to know good people exist, but you need good people to know God exists."
-MarkA15
09-17-2018, 10:23 AM
#2749
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
That's fair. 850 just was instrumental to me.
Coming from the D750 the D850 would feel like a big step up. And for anything that moves the D850 is a big step up from the D800.
However if you mainly shoot landscapes or static subjects you won't really see a significant difference in IQ over the D800E. And with my pano obsession these days it makes no difference at all.
However if you mainly shoot landscapes or static subjects you won't really see a significant difference in IQ over the D800E. And with my pano obsession these days it makes no difference at all.
in other news this weekend, I had an opportunity to shoot side by side with John Law and Matt Burn, covering the Glory Kickboxing 58th event. I still can't believe that I actually got to meet them, and shoot next to them.. and see their workflow.
/fangirlmoment
09-27-2018, 12:43 AM
#2750
The latest crazy tech news, mirrorless is on fire these days;
Fujifilm has announced their newest mirrorless camera, medium format, the GFX:
- 100mp medium format mirrorless
- IBIS
- AF is phase-detect on-sensor
- 4k video
- compact body
- appears to have the Sony 100mp cmos sensor that is in the Hasselblad H6D
- will cost around 10'000usd which is nothing compared to the Hasselblad H6D which is 33'000usd
We talked earlier in this thread that there were not many big jumps in camera tech lately, well here is one!
Fujifilm has announced their newest mirrorless camera, medium format, the GFX:
- 100mp medium format mirrorless
- IBIS
- AF is phase-detect on-sensor
- 4k video
- compact body
- appears to have the Sony 100mp cmos sensor that is in the Hasselblad H6D
- will cost around 10'000usd which is nothing compared to the Hasselblad H6D which is 33'000usd
We talked earlier in this thread that there were not many big jumps in camera tech lately, well here is one!
10-02-2018, 04:48 PM
#2751
whats up guys. i havent been to this forum in a very very long time. anyway's here's my updated flickr page - pls post some comments
https://www.flickr.com/gp/zawodowy_fotograf/8BBG5C
https://www.flickr.com/gp/zawodowy_fotograf/8BBG5C
interior crocodie aligator
i drive a chevrolet movie theater
mountain man #77
MISC guitarist #10
- abi_yo_shiva
- sex.murder.art
-
- abi_yo_shiva
- sex.murder.art
- Join Date: Aug 2004
- Posts: 1,560
- Rep Power: 0
-
10-03-2018, 07:58 AM
#2752
Originally Posted By abi_yo_shiva⏩
Nice!
whats up guys. i havent been to this forum in a very very long time. anyway's here's my updated flickr page - pls post some comments
https://www.flickr.com/gp/zawodowy_fotograf/8BBG5C
https://www.flickr.com/gp/zawodowy_fotograf/8BBG5C
Welcome back after 14 years you sunuvabitch
i would take her temperature with my beef thermometer.
ya rly
BOZZED 5/12/11 - never forget
- dixie_normus
- Yes, it's that big
-
- dixie_normus
- Yes, it's that big
- Join Date: Apr 2009
- Posts: 5,680
- Rep Power: 16,441
-
10-03-2018, 08:47 AM
#2753
Another rig shot of the Viper with A7R III and 24-70 GM.
Shot this with the 85 ART. Edited with the Imagenomic Portraiture plugin:
Shot this with the 85 ART. Edited with the Imagenomic Portraiture plugin:
- mingrey02stg2
- Registered User
-
- mingrey02stg2
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: United States
- Posts: 1,786
- Rep Power: 80,155
-
10-04-2018, 12:31 AM
#2754
^ very nice shots!
Maybe the highlights on the Viper are a tad too white I would say.
Portrait is very nice. Did you use some fill light or a bounce card? Lighting is nice and flattering on her face, well done.
Maybe the highlights on the Viper are a tad too white I would say.
Portrait is very nice. Did you use some fill light or a bounce card? Lighting is nice and flattering on her face, well done.
10-04-2018, 09:19 AM
#2755
Originally Posted By microspot⏩
I agree about the highlights… the sun was just so bright so pulling out the shadows and still making the paint look good was a bit of a task.
^ very nice shots!
Maybe the highlights on the Viper are a tad too white I would say.
Portrait is very nice. Did you use some fill light or a bounce card? Lighting is nice and flattering on her face, well done.
Maybe the highlights on the Viper are a tad too white I would say.
Portrait is very nice. Did you use some fill light or a bounce card? Lighting is nice and flattering on her face, well done.
The portrait was actually done with ******t light during the golden hour. Thanks for the comments!
- mingrey02stg2
- Registered User
-
- mingrey02stg2
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: United States
- Posts: 1,786
- Rep Power: 80,155
-
10-04-2018, 02:29 PM
#2756
Originally Posted By mingrey02stg2⏩
I would have been interested to see the outcome with the highlights pulled all the way down. When I worked as a Marketing Manager at a Ferrari Dealership (LieutenantGains can confirm), I was in charge of taking the inventory photos. I often times pulled down the highlights down all the way. Ill attach a few inventory shots below:
I agree about the highlights… the sun was just so bright so pulling out the shadows and still making the paint look good was a bit of a task.
The portrait was actually done with ******t light during the golden hour. Thanks for the comments!
The portrait was actually done with ******t light during the golden hour. Thanks for the comments!
Disclaimer…apparently the service I used to upload the photos to the forum degraded the quality
FEELSBADMAN.JPG
10-05-2018, 05:44 AM
#2757
^ yeah looks good like this, especially the first one is perfectly exposed
10-06-2018, 07:10 AM
#2758
Originally Posted By microspot⏩
Thanks man! The lighting was perfect! You could probably take an amazing shot with an iPhone in that condition.
^ yeah looks good like this, especially the first one is perfectly exposed
10-07-2018, 12:08 AM
#2759
Recently came back from Nepal. Heres a few snaps i took
P9090053-2
P9100219
P9160988
P9171272
P9201571
P9090053-2
P9100219
P9160988
P9171272
P9201571
- SquatWombats
- Registered User
-
- SquatWombats
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2010
- Age: 34
- Posts: 3,279
- Rep Power: 7,812
-
10-07-2018, 05:12 PM
#2760
Originally Posted By UrbexBrah⏩
Am LieutenantGains, can confirm
When I worked as a Marketing Manager at a Ferrari Dealership (LieutenantGains can confirm)
Just spent the last few weekends putting together a new website solely focused on automotive and motorsport so I can start pitching myself to clients in a better way, and now my other domain will solely be for weddings, lmk what you brahs think!
www.garyhebdingphoto.com
Going to add an "other" section somewhere later with travel pics/etc
Misc photography crew
Chicago crew
Polski crew
Throw keys on bench to claim it crew
6'2" 193lbs crew
#MMGA
- LieutenantGains
- Registered User
-
- LieutenantGains
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2013
- Posts: 6,303
- Rep Power: 84,603
-
Bookmarks
- Digg
- del.icio.us
- StumbleUpon
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts