Forum
»
More General Categories
»
Misc.
» Official Misc Photography Crew, Part V "Do you even shoot?"
01-18-2019, 08:44 PM
#2851
01-19-2019, 01:36 AM
#2852
Originally Posted By LieutenantGains⏩
Nice dude, always a fan of your work.
- SquatWombats
- Registered User
- SquatWombats
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2010
- Age: 34
- Posts: 3,279
- Rep Power: 7,812
-
01-19-2019, 08:05 PM
#2853
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
Im man enough to say this.
Go into the Custom Setting menu and under "g Movie" there should be an option (g4?) to assign video recording to the shutter button.
Once that is enabled any compatible remote should be able to trigger it.
Once that is enabled any compatible remote should be able to trigger it.
I love you.
01-19-2019, 10:27 PM
#2854
01-19-2019, 10:34 PM
#2855
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
What movie is this?? Stallone and Swayze together?
Financial Freedom/Passive Income Crew
Entrepreneur Crew
MMA Crew
Cinematographer Crew
Photographer Crew
Ski/Snowboard Crew
Guns Crew
01-20-2019, 12:50 PM
#2856
Originally Posted By iloveus⏩
Call me google cuz I gotchu. Tango and cash. Also, not swayze
What movie is this?? Stallone and Swayze together?
"It won't get better, just different."
01-20-2019, 01:23 PM
#2857
Thinking about selling my 85mm 1.8 and buying a 55mm 1.8
I don't use the 85mm much and I think I could get more use out of a 55mm in both photography and videography. Thoughts?
I don't use the 85mm much and I think I could get more use out of a 55mm in both photography and videography. Thoughts?
★☆★ Full-Time Philadelphia Eagles Fan ★☆★
100% 中國人
USMC Infantry
- theACEofSPADES
- ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠
- theACEofSPADES
- ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: New York, United States
- Posts: 20,926
- Rep Power: 202,804
-
01-20-2019, 01:27 PM
#2858
Originally Posted By theACEofSPADES⏩
bruh I remember you got into photography like 6 months ago. You're getting caught up in buying gear.
Thinking about selling my 85mm 1.8 and buying a 55mm 1.8
I don't use the 85mm much and I think get more use out of a 55mm in both photography and videography. Thoughts?
I don't use the 85mm much and I think get more use out of a 55mm in both photography and videography. Thoughts?
- Cinderblock
- 🍆
- Join Date: Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,058
- Rep Power: 55,571
-
01-20-2019, 03:45 PM
#2859
Originally Posted By Cinderblock⏩
My cash flow is nice right now. Im pretty good at saving.
bruh I remember you got into photography like 6 months ago. You're getting caught up in buying gear.
I don't have that much though…
- Sony A7III
- 16-35 f4
- 85mm 1.8
- kit lens I'm about to sell
- Cheap Amazon tripod
- Shure VP83 mic
- Extra battery and charger
★☆★ Full-Time Philadelphia Eagles Fan ★☆★
100% 中國人
USMC Infantry
- theACEofSPADES
- ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠
- theACEofSPADES
- ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: New York, United States
- Posts: 20,926
- Rep Power: 202,804
-
01-20-2019, 09:19 PM
#2860
Only been shooting for a few years so I'm new at this with so much to learn.
National Level Competitor (Female BB)
01-21-2019, 12:24 AM
#2861
Originally Posted By kimm4⏩
Nice shot! If you wish to learn something; something you can look into is not having blown out highlights, like on your tree on the left.
Only been shooting for a few years so I'm new at this with so much to learn.
Blown out highlights are parts of the image where the actual picture information is lost and all you have left is pure flat white.
There is nothing inherently wrong with blown out highlights, and you can have as much of them as you want if it serves the art direction you are going for.
But then they should be controlled and wanted, and not happen by mistake.
In your picture the big white stripe on the tree actually distracts from your crow subject, as the eye is drawn there and away from your subject.
There are 2 ways to introduce blown out highlights:
1. You overexposed your shot and the information is completely lost, you cannot retrieve the highlights with an image editing software using highlights recovery.
2. During your image editing process you pushed the highlights too high and clipped them.
If you want to give it a try; take your original shot and see if you can recover the highlights in your image editing software. Then convert your picture to black and white and edit it again without blowing the highlights on the tree. Which software do you use btw?
01-21-2019, 12:29 AM
#2862
Originally Posted By jmelanson⏩
very nice shot!
flying bird shot
Originally Posted By SquatWombats⏩
your last two shots are outstanding. very nice work
Just came back from a week long roadtrip to outback australia with a few mates. Camped at national parks along the way.
Originally Posted By zknarc⏩
the fact that they will introduce raw video support made those cameras so much better. I'm looking forward to seeing what the raw video quality is like
From CES show at the Nikon stand. All the cries of 'should only be a simple firmware update' may be answered and more as Nikon clearly plan to upgrade the new bodies through life. If eye af is as good as Sony it might well just push me over the edge…
01-21-2019, 11:08 AM
#2863
Originally Posted By microspot⏩
Understood and thank you.
I use Lightroom.
Nice shot! If you wish to learn something; something you can look into is not having blown out highlights, like on your tree on the left.
Blown out highlights are parts of the image where the actual picture information is lost and all you have left is pure flat white.
There is nothing inherently wrong with blown out highlights, and you can have as much of them as you want if it serves the art direction you are going for.
But then they should be controlled and wanted, and not happen by mistake.
In your picture the big white stripe on the tree actually distracts from your crow subject, as the eye is drawn there and away from your subject.
There are 2 ways to introduce blown out highlights:
1. You overexposed your shot and the information is completely lost, you cannot retrieve the highlights with an image editing software using highlights recovery.
2. During your image editing process you pushed the highlights too high and clipped them.
If you want to give it a try; take your original shot and see if you can recover the highlights in your image editing software. Then convert your picture to black and white and edit it again without blowing the highlights on the tree. Which software do you use btw?
Blown out highlights are parts of the image where the actual picture information is lost and all you have left is pure flat white.
There is nothing inherently wrong with blown out highlights, and you can have as much of them as you want if it serves the art direction you are going for.
But then they should be controlled and wanted, and not happen by mistake.
In your picture the big white stripe on the tree actually distracts from your crow subject, as the eye is drawn there and away from your subject.
There are 2 ways to introduce blown out highlights:
1. You overexposed your shot and the information is completely lost, you cannot retrieve the highlights with an image editing software using highlights recovery.
2. During your image editing process you pushed the highlights too high and clipped them.
If you want to give it a try; take your original shot and see if you can recover the highlights in your image editing software. Then convert your picture to black and white and edit it again without blowing the highlights on the tree. Which software do you use btw?
National Level Competitor (Female BB)
01-26-2019, 12:14 AM
#2864
Hey whats up boys! i haven't checked into this photography thread in about 4 years. Glad to see that it is growing and everyone is progressing.
To lazy to embed my stuff on here but if you guys want to check out my recent photography stuff, look up my instagram. @mannysinstagraam
To lazy to embed my stuff on here but if you guys want to check out my recent photography stuff, look up my instagram. @mannysinstagraam
*Photography crew
Gym Lifts
- 255 bench/ 110dbs bench x 3
- 315 squat/ 285 front squat
- 405 deadlift
- 175 ohp
- manuelthegreat
- I Am Manlet
- manuelthegreat
- I Am Manlet
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 923
- Rep Power: 3,822
-
01-26-2019, 07:25 PM
#2865
Sony A7III
16mm | f11 | 1/100 | ISO 80
Old pick from last Spring when I first started shooting. I cringe at how bad the photos are lol.
★☆★ Full-Time Philadelphia Eagles Fan ★☆★
100% 中國人
USMC Infantry
- theACEofSPADES
- ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠
- theACEofSPADES
- ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: New York, United States
- Posts: 20,926
- Rep Power: 202,804
-
01-26-2019, 07:43 PM
#2866
Originally Posted By theACEofSPADES⏩
Sony A7III
16mm | f11 | 1/100 | ISO 80
Old pick from last Spring when I first started shooting. I cringe at how bad the photos are lol.
Nice shoot
I think mine was taken about 5 feet in front of you with a 14mm Rokinon (back in 2014).
Sony A7III
16mm | f11 | 1/100 | ISO 80
Old pick from last Spring when I first started shooting. I cringe at how bad the photos are lol.
Originally Posted By acrawlingchaos⏩
- acrawlingchaos
- Registered User
- acrawlingchaos
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: New Hampshire, United States
- Age: 47
- Posts: 16,398
- Rep Power: 150,407
-
01-27-2019, 04:56 PM
#2867
New portrait work, had a random 50 degree day here a few weeks ago and it was like it was summer again.
Arisa by Gary Hebding Jr. , on Flickr
Arisa by Gary Hebding Jr. , on Flickr
Misc photography crew
Chicago crew
Polski crew
Throw keys on bench to claim it crew
6'2" 193lbs crew
#MMGA
- LieutenantGains
- Registered User
- LieutenantGains
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2013
- Posts: 6,303
- Rep Power: 84,603
-
01-27-2019, 07:01 PM
#2868
First attempt at lightroom. First real attempt at shooting manually tbh. Taking a course based on landscape photography so trying to get up to speed quickly. The main goal was to avoid blown out photos. The original photo did have some light highlighting that I managed to subdue for the most part in lightroom.
ISO 400/ F 7.1 / SS 1/250
Any feedback is appreciated.
ISO 400/ F 7.1 / SS 1/250
Any feedback is appreciated.
Your schtick sucks and it screams insecurity.
- digital022
- Registered User
- digital022
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 5,053
- Rep Power: 42,448
-
01-28-2019, 01:17 AM
#2869
Originally Posted By LieutenantGains⏩
very nice portrait, nice light and colors!
New portrait work, had a random 50 degree day here a few weeks ago and it was like it was summer again.
I guess it could use a very slight crop, because she is basically centered but just a little bit off.
And the dark building right on the border on the left attracts the eyes away from her.
Breathing space is a good thing and you made good use of it, I feel there is slightly too much to her left and over her head though.
Originally Posted By digital022⏩
Nice shot, and nice work on the dynamic range, your goal is achieved the exposure is on point!
First attempt at lightroom. First real attempt at shooting manually tbh. Taking a course based on landscape photography so trying to get up to speed quickly. The main goal was to avoid blown out photos. The original photo did have some light highlighting that I managed to subdue for the most part in lightroom.
ISO 400/ F 7.1 / SS 1/250
Any feedback is appreciated.
ISO 400/ F 7.1 / SS 1/250
Any feedback is appreciated.
Here is some feedback:
1. What is the subject of your photograph?
Right now when looking at your image it is unclear what the subject of your image is. All of the elements; buildings, car, tree, have the same "weight" in the picture. There is no clear subject. You should frame and compose your shot to highlight your subject.
2. Full Blur or no Blur
The car in your shot only has a little bit of motion blur.
Because it only has a slight amount of blur it looks odd compared to the rest.
You are losing detail and quality on the car without gaining any visual interest in return.
If it were a lot more blurred then you would introduce a feeling of motion in your image and the car would not stand out as "out of focus and lower quality" but would be an interesting visual element in your shot.
On the other hand if it had no motion blur then that would be fine as well, as it would have the same quality and level of detail as the rest of the shot.
So you could either expose longer to introduce a more pronounced motion blur, or increase the shutter speed to completely freeze the motion on the car.
3. Lightroom Lens Correction
Since you are learning Lightroom, you can look into the lens correction tab and the upright section to have Lightroom help you fix lens distortion and level your image.
01-28-2019, 06:28 PM
#2870
Catching up on uploads from last month.
Fun fact: Shot this from a restaurant.
Tatry Mountains - Zakopane, Poland by Gary Hebding Jr. , on Flickr
Fun fact: Shot this from a restaurant.
Tatry Mountains - Zakopane, Poland by Gary Hebding Jr. , on Flickr
Misc photography crew
Chicago crew
Polski crew
Throw keys on bench to claim it crew
6'2" 193lbs crew
#MMGA
- LieutenantGains
- Registered User
- LieutenantGains
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2013
- Posts: 6,303
- Rep Power: 84,603
-
01-29-2019, 07:55 PM
#2871
Looking for a landscape tripod. Currently using the cheap Amazon brand tripod. No way am I trusting that outdoors
I want it to be light enough to hike with but sturdy enough to use on rocks and uneven surfaces. Any recommendations?
I want it to be light enough to hike with but sturdy enough to use on rocks and uneven surfaces. Any recommendations?
★☆★ Full-Time Philadelphia Eagles Fan ★☆★
100% 中國人
USMC Infantry
- theACEofSPADES
- ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠
- theACEofSPADES
- ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: New York, United States
- Posts: 20,926
- Rep Power: 202,804
-
01-29-2019, 09:18 PM
#2872
Ace, what's your budget?
01-29-2019, 09:54 PM
#2873
First try at deep sky stacking, i.e. static camera, multiple exposures then the software works out the star movement, then aligns and averages them all.
Worked okay. This was ~200 exposures, ISO12800, f5.6, 2secs. Will go for 1 sec next time, the stars are a little eggy.
But the software managed to average out all the noise from such a high ISO, I'm impressed.
Worked okay. This was ~200 exposures, ISO12800, f5.6, 2secs. Will go for 1 sec next time, the stars are a little eggy.
But the software managed to average out all the noise from such a high ISO, I'm impressed.
GO LOCAL SPORTSBALL TEAM
*** Pureblood Master Race ***
*** Official Misc Photography Crew ***
01-30-2019, 12:44 AM
#2874
Originally Posted By dakensta⏩
very cool that you get to shoot that kind of images with a consumer static camera!
First try at deep sky stacking, i.e. static camera, multiple exposures then the software works out the star movement, then aligns and averages them all.
Worked okay. This was ~200 exposures, ISO12800, f5.6, 2secs. Will go for 1 sec next time, the stars are a little eggy.
But the software managed to average out all the noise from such a high ISO, I'm impressed.
Worked okay. This was ~200 exposures, ISO12800, f5.6, 2secs. Will go for 1 sec next time, the stars are a little eggy.
But the software managed to average out all the noise from such a high ISO, I'm impressed.
And very impressive what the software does with the tracking, position averaging and noise reduction, crazy.
What lens did you use?
01-30-2019, 11:06 AM
#2875
Originally Posted By microspot⏩
Tamron 70-300 SP.
very cool that you get to shoot that kind of images with a consumer static camera!
And very impressive what the software does with the tracking, position averaging and noise reduction, crazy.
What lens did you use?
And very impressive what the software does with the tracking, position averaging and noise reduction, crazy.
What lens did you use?
Stacking software is DeepSkyStacker, and it's free!
GO LOCAL SPORTSBALL TEAM
*** Pureblood Master Race ***
*** Official Misc Photography Crew ***
01-30-2019, 11:10 AM
#2876
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
Probably $200 max. I know that's kind of mid range for a tripod but I'm not sure how much I'd be using it. I just dont want to risk my cheap $40 Amazon tripod holding up $3,500 worth of gear.
Ace, what's your budget?
★☆★ Full-Time Philadelphia Eagles Fan ★☆★
100% 中國人
USMC Infantry
- theACEofSPADES
- ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠
- theACEofSPADES
- ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: New York, United States
- Posts: 20,926
- Rep Power: 202,804
-
01-30-2019, 11:41 AM
#2877
Originally Posted By theACEofSPADES⏩
Tripods are one of the things in life where you essentially "get what you pay for". You must really define both your budget as well as your desired use case.
Looking for a landscape tripod. Currently using the cheap Amazon brand tripod. No way am I trusting that outdoors
I want it to be light enough to hike with but sturdy enough to use on rocks and uneven surfaces. Any recommendations?
I want it to be light enough to hike with but sturdy enough to use on rocks and uneven surfaces. Any recommendations?
For example, will you be shooting often in stormy high wind scenarios? If not, then you can very likely get away with a lighter travel tripod. If you will be shooting in windy conditions regularly then you may want/need to invest in a more professional grade / heavier tripod.
I actually own three different tripods and they each have their own unique use cases. When I shoot seascapes (where I'll potentially be in the waves) or high wind situations, I will use my Gitzo Systematic (which is a monster). The problem is, it is very heavy so when we are backpacking for long trips it can get kind of heavy. In longer hiking situations, I use my RRS TVC-24L which is about half the weight but still very sturdy. For my lighter gear, I have a Benro travel tripod which is very light but not ideal for supporting my heavier Nikon D850.
Also factor into the equation that you'll want a good ballhead to go with your leg setup. I'm a very big fan of RRS, although they are quite spendy - but easily the best I've ever used.
Oh, one last point - even if you have a lower quality tripod and head, you can still get away with it if you plan accordingly. For example, using things exposure delay timers in combination with hands free shutter releases can really help keep things stable while the exposure is being taken. I've successfully shot my D850 and huge 70-200mm lens on my travel Benro tripod this way before. You have to be more careful, but it can work on calm days…
http://stackingplates.com
http://instagram.com/mrstackingplates
- StackingPlates
- Quadfather
- StackingPlates
- Quadfather
- Join Date: Mar 2012
- Posts: 977
- Rep Power: 34,901
-
01-30-2019, 12:09 PM
#2878
Originally Posted By theACEofSPADES⏩
I'd just use a Gimball
Looking for a landscape tripod. Currently using the cheap Amazon brand tripod. No way am I trusting that outdoors
I want it to be light enough to hike with but sturdy enough to use on rocks and uneven surfaces. Any recommendations?
I want it to be light enough to hike with but sturdy enough to use on rocks and uneven surfaces. Any recommendations?
Financial Freedom/Passive Income Crew
Entrepreneur Crew
MMA Crew
Cinematographer Crew
Photographer Crew
Ski/Snowboard Crew
Guns Crew
01-30-2019, 12:17 PM
#2879
Originally Posted By theACEofSPADES⏩
Carbon fiber is the best choice for a light tripod but it'd be difficult to find one <$200 especially if you're expecting a ball head with it.
Probably $200 max. I know that's kind of mid range for a tripod but I'm not sure how much I'd be using it. I just dont want to risk my cheap $40 Amazon tripod holding up $3,500 worth of gear.
- CF tripods from lowest to highest price with a 5 star rating
- Aluminum tripods from lowest to highest price with a 5 star rating
01-30-2019, 12:52 PM
#2880
Originally Posted By StackingPlates⏩
RRS is top notch and I always buy US made gear where I can.
I actually own three different tripods and they each have their own unique use cases. When I shoot seascapes (where I'll potentially be in the waves) or high wind situations, I will use my Gitzo Systematic (which is a monster). The problem is, it is very heavy so when we are backpacking for long trips it can get kind of heavy. In longer hiking situations, I use my RRS TVC-24L which is about half the weight but still very sturdy. For my lighter gear, I have a Benro travel tripod which is very light but not ideal for supporting my heavier Nikon D850.
Also factor into the equation that you'll want a good ballhead to go with your leg setup. I'm a very big fan of RRS, although they are quite spendy - but easily the best I've ever used.
Also factor into the equation that you'll want a good ballhead to go with your leg setup. I'm a very big fan of RRS, although they are quite spendy - but easily the best I've ever used.
Which systematic is it? Mine goes from around 3" to 6'6" and weighs a little over 4lbs without the head. That's the height/weight sweet spot for me. Never had any issues lugging it around and it's been rock solid fully extended — as always with any tripod in the wind I'll weigh it down with my bag. I also like having spikes when shooting on rocks which are hidden under rubber feet when not needed. It's also easy to strip the whole thing down and quickly clean it so it always feels like new.
Completely agree with you re: you get what you pay for. Had mine for over 8 years and it's never failed me. The best money I ever spent on photography along with my favorite lenses. Cameras come and go.
Bookmarks
- Digg
- del.icio.us
- StumbleUpon
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts