Caucasoids = white or white phenotypic-features NOT skin tone alone

there are only 3 races caucs, mongoloid (i.e Asiatic) and negroid...all are a mix of these or not so at all. sometimes Pacific-islanders are suggested as another race, which might be true. irish might be a pure race for all I know (red hair/freckles) that crossed over into Europe.

I'm sure you all know that Arabs are extremely inbred. First cousin marriage is still super common. in fact, muslims have argued that the risks (around mid 90s of bad result) is worth it. Something you can simply notice is that all of them look extremely similar ASIDE from skin tone. Conversely, I believe Africans even have more genetic diversity across the continent for a number of reasons (ummm see Darwin/galapagos)

Anyway I was at the gym and noticed a group of Arab men. straight up they don't go to the gym alone they seem to need 3-5 to simply go do curls. One actually doing them and the rest standing around talking (loudly) .

We all know how IQ is distributed. for Caucs you gonna see about 20-30% above average and for the black, like maybe 5-10% above-average in IQ.

Asians, I believe, started out from a much-higher baseline of IQ for whatever reason.

this is kinda shitpost tbh as my ideas are all over the board but basically whites higher IQ suggests greater diversity (Heterozygosity: The proportion of individuals in a population that have two different alleles for a particular gene) than other races. with the black being the lowest and arabs second to last. not to mention that whites look most diverse in sharp contrast to Arabs who are known inbreeders.

Asiatics are somewhat of anomoly I dunno why. i have a feeling indians got their sometimes higher IQ (aside from being outwitted by trains) from Asiatic peoples.

Thoughts?

btw: yes I know this is poorly written. I just came back from the gym and am still traumatized by all the lowlifes who go on Friday night (including myself as a despicable forumcel)

Here is that raycis may-may from back in the day about this very subject. We are so intellectual

the entire left panel explains the higher IQ.

However, it also suggests that there is an IQ ceiling for most of the right-panel. Of course there is a ceiling for whites but it at a higher level that may still be unattainable to much of the left side.

but who was master race ?

this is true from what i've understood. i have a feeling that neanderthals had their way with lots of women thus changing the race in its entirety. similar at a latter time of attila the hun who supposedly has his dna in every Asiatic person. i will say I don't literally mean one guy Attilla but i assume his entire gang was like their leader (although he prolly got dibs).

wrong

5k + years ago , Indians were kangs and shiettt srs

Hinduism was prevalent then and the mongoloids were cavemen.
Then coes africa/syrua/russia etc

why do u think white men have an easy time with chinook women ? survival of the fittest.

Africa has by far the greatest genetic diversity, mutiple genetic studies have confirmed that over and over.

OF COURSE, Iv'e read that tripe.

lemme give you an example...dogs look super diverse ...and yet they are dogs and can be outsmarted by a crow. what does that tell you? prol lots of genetic variation but the pool is shallow.

obvs exception to my GSD.

Genetic diversity has nothing to do with a made up human concept such as IQ.

Australian natives score low on iq tests and yet they have been probably the most succesful human group in the history of humanity. They have survived and mantained their ubique culture for 30k+ continous years isnt that a sign of intelligence?

I would die in a couple days in the australian outback yet they have survived there for thousands of years.

Can you name an ethnic group that has remained in the same place and mantained their culture/genes for more than even 2k years?

n. sentinel island.

true they also genemaxxx mogg

Caucs sounds like cawks which sounds like cocks.

ftfy

The ability to adapt and overcome seems to be more a marker for intelligence versus staying the same. To me, anyway.

I guess the question you have to ask about a group is are they staying the same out of a conscious desire and what they are doing is the "best", or because they lack the capacity to change.

All of their worldview and culture aligns with how the live.