nice essay about dicks mate

Didn't read, only negged

cliffs?

Didn't read, only negged

twitterbrain syndrome is strong I see. If you must avoid reading at all costs:

1. Chads and men with huge c@wks give off a strong dominant aura that is attractive to women.
2. Women want to be possessed by these men because it is embedded in their DNA from feudal times when kings and lords had their pick.
3. This is good for Chad, mixed for women and society, bad for average and below average men.
4. Going forward we can either try to return to monogamy, or institute UBI so that incels can NEETmax as they have no incentive to work because they have no family to provide for.

cliffs?

So it's basically an essay about big cocks on a forum full of men..

Cliffs: OP is a phaggot

Also, negged. Phaggot.

Cliffs: OP is a phaggot

Also, negged. Phaggot.

NEGGED



Can't even read a few lines of cliffs. Birdbrain.

NEGGED.

Yeah...apparently you need a big cock to be a good father.

Inb4 LAHipster...

Most men with huge c@wks and even Chads with average 6 inchers are alpha and give off a dominant aura. They use women and treat them poorly and keep them in a rotation. This is why there are so many incels. The only reason women only fuck Chads and guys with massive slongs is because they can. If their options were limited, IE if Chad Thundercawk wouldn't fuck them because he already has a gf or wife, then they would be forced to marry regular guys and the dating market and sexual market would reset to a stasis where most people relatively end up with their looksmatch.

Modern dating dynamics have created an ecosystem where polyamory for Chad Thunderc@wks is encouraged. Women settle for being rotation options because once they get a taste of Chad or BBC they would rather be a third option for one of those guys, basically an on call wh0re who treats them like one than be in a loving relationship with a normal man who treats them well.This is partially because women have been awakened to a past primal state. In the past, kings and lords had their choice of all the pu$$y and they could take another man's woman and even his wife if they wanted her. This biological servitude is still encoded in the DNA of women. When they are in a Chad's rotation, this is the modern equivalent of being owned by a king. Women don't just settle for this state, they CRAVE it once it is awakened within them. That is especially true when it is paired with the sexual arousal they get from riding a Chad with a chiseled body and a massive veiny member.

Why is this bad?

This has negative effects for various people. It is obviously bad for the men who get left out, because they either become incels or end up simpmaxing and betabuxmaxing for used up sloots who usually cheat on them after they pop out a kid. This ends in divorce more often than not which isn't good for the kid. It's partially bad for the sloots because unlike in feudal times their "kings" aren't providing for them or resulting offspring financially. Concubines didn't have great lives as they didn't go out in public with the king/lord and couldn't have any other lovers but their needs were taken care of at least. Women don't understand this though as they are just following the whims of their limbic systems that are telling them to fill themselves with as many huge c@wks as possible to chase that feeling of being owned by a lord.

Pre-modern society "saved" women and men from this fate with monogamy, which gave everyone purpose and was very good for strengthening society. When men can get a looksmatch wife who will be loyal they will work hard to provide for their wife and the kids. If you remove that possibility from men's lives or dramatically reduce their options, they don't have incentive to be productive members of society. Why would a man work hard if he has to simpmaxx for a woman way below his looksmatch or a 40 year old used up "reformed" sloot who will probably cheat on him? There is no incentive for average and below average men to advance themselves in career and be productive members of society. It is more logical for them to NEETmax or do the bare minimum at a low stress part time job.

Why is this good?

This is obviously good for Chads, BBCs, and any man with a huge pen0r. As long as you aren't autistic and have an alpha aura, all women will desire you and want to be owned by you. It's partially good for the women as long as they are aware of the situation and can provide for themselves because Chad isn't going to. It's arguably good for society because the men getting filtered out of the dating pool are undesirable for mating and mostly don't have good traits to pass on. A lot of these men are also betas who would be bad fathers. So any children that are born will have better odds of being attractive, athletic, and large c@wks and they will have better fathers.

So where do we go from here?

Well IMO we have 2 options. First is with AI taking so many jobs these beta males can collect UBI and NEETmax and live comfortable lives while the alpha males can dominate and continue civilization. The only other option would be a return to monogamy. I'd be willing to try either, although option 2 would be difficult.

DISCLAIMER: I am a 6'5" 300 lb man whose c@wk measures 9.5x6.75 in. I am a manmore Chad by most definitions. But I've had a spiritual awakening. It is our duty to our fellow men to support them either by helping them be NEET or by attempting to return to monogamy. I've tried but every time I relapse into polyamory. There is so much fine sh!t everywhere nowadays and the quantity and quality of pu$$y available is irresistable, especially when they worship me.

I read maybe 20-25 words.


Then I stopped.


You guise having a good weekend?

that's a lot of words brah

even the cliff note version isn't revealing. Are you saying this thread states that confident men get women? We need something more insightful for a thread. Redo

Real alphas post essays on New Delhi misc that no one reads