We never landed on the moon btw

Damn

NASA is fake and gay.

Op is retarded.

why havent we been back since?

was expecting pics of very large moons with lots of craters

Dunno. Looking forward to the next worldstar link.

They lost the technology. What's so hard to understand about that?

*never had the technology


Look at this fucking confetti “explosion”….what’s fucking joke.

Yeah never happened

This

Stanley Kubrick on thin wire watch

I can almost understand getting there...but coming back? c'mon thats a feat that seems almost impossible NOW let alone then.

Exactly. If something SEEMS impossible, it’s absolutely fake and gay (wifi, GPS satellites, fibre optics, touchscreens etc. All fake)

The only real thing on this planet is my love for Joe Rogan. I get all my opinions and information from him

The special effects were kind of poverty in those times

People still think it is real today.

Were you there?

stale argument. there are other reasons I'm sure you are aware of.

but the underlying issue is distance. I mean you can begin and start there. lets see if they do it again as they allegedly plan to. I wouldnt bet on it.

The moon landing is 100% fake.

1. "Why haven't we been back since 1972?"
Money and politics. Apollo was insanely expensive during the Space Race. Once we won, Congress cut the budget hard. We went to shuttles and ISS instead. Artemis is trying to go back now.

2. Nixon phone call to the Moon
Not magic. Nixon called Houston on a normal phone. Houston patched it through big radio dishes (the ones they used for all Apollo comms) straight to the lunar module. There was a ~5 second delay like there should be. Same system they used the whole mission.

3. Flag "waving"
It had a horizontal rod at the top. They twisted the pole when planting it. In vacuum the ripples just keep going because no air to stop them. Doesn't wave after they let go.

4. No stars in the photos
Cameras were set for bright daylight on the Moon (fast shutter). Same reason you don't see stars in daytime pics on Earth.

5. Weird shadows / "multiple lights"
Uneven ground + super bright reflected light off the lunar surface. One light source (Sun) but looks fucked up because of the terrain and wide lenses.

6. Van Allen belts would fry them
They went through the belts fast on a smart trajectory. Shielding + short time = low dose. Actual radiation readings from the missions were fine.

7. "Kubrick filmed it / studio"
Would need hundreds of thousands of people to stay quiet for 55 years with zero real leaks. Soviets tracked it live and never exposed it (they would've loved to).

8. "Lost the technology"
Not literally lost, but rebuilding 60s custom shit from scratch today costs a fortune with new rules/supply chains. Doesn't mean it didn't happen.

9. Landing sites
Modern orbiters from USA, India, China, Japan have photographed the exact landing spots, rover tracks, and hardware left behind.

Bottom line: physical proof (Moon rocks checked by other countries, laser reflectors still used today, tracking data) is way stronger than "looks fake to me" arguments.

Courtesy of GROK.

Nah we've managed to get microplastics on both the moon and mars, while also getting human piss and shit on the moon (before India even arrived and fell over).

Truly a peak human achievement.