Forum
»
Isn't it immoral to have children knowing the next generations will be totally fucked?
- Results 1 to 14 of 14
-
Page 1 of 1
5 days ago, 03:11 AM
-
#1
- smallcalves
- Join Date: Jul, 2026
- Posts: 908
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Isn't it immoral to have children knowing the next generations will be totally fucked?
I've been trying to have children but I wonder about it. The quality of my life is so much worse than my father's. And the quality of life of my children would probably be terrible. Surveillance state with no career prospects. Poverty and own nothing. And eat bugs etc
What the fuck the world is totally ruined
What the fuck the world is totally ruined
5 days ago, 03:35 AM
-
#2
Originally Posted By smallcalves⏩
The cost of a house is absurb for someone working as a cashier for say a coffee shop. I think the best thing to do for someone is to buy a cheap car and get a trailer. You're looking at 20 grand. Then keep finding jobs with good pay, save up and get a mortgage for a decent house.
I've been trying to have children but I wonder about it. The quality of my life is so much worse than my father's. And the quality of life of my children would probably be terrible. Surveillance state with no career prospects. Poverty and own nothing. And eat bugs etc
What the fuck the world is totally ruined
What the fuck the world is totally ruined
5 days ago, 03:37 AM
-
#3
- r32gojirra
- Registered NEET
-
- r32gojirra
- Registered NEET
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: East Coast, Australia
- Posts: 39,544
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 597043
-
-
We covered this already OP
You, specifically, are not supposed to have children
See further Darwin, C.
You, specifically, are not supposed to have children
See further Darwin, C.
5 days ago, 03:40 AM
-
#4
- smallcalves
- Join Date: Jul, 2026
- Posts: 908
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By r32gojirra⏩
Shut up retard
We covered this already OP
You, specifically, are not supposed to have children
See further Darwin, C.
You, specifically, are not supposed to have children
See further Darwin, C.
5 days ago, 03:41 AM
-
#5
- smallcalves
- Join Date: Jul, 2026
- Posts: 908
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By theory⏩
This does not address the question.
The cost of a house is absurb for someone working as a cashier for say a coffee shop. I think the best thing to do for someone is to buy a cheap car and get a trailer. You're looking at 20 grand. Then keep finding jobs with good pay, save up and get a mortgage for a decent house.
5 days ago, 03:42 AM
-
#6
Originally Posted By smallcalves⏩
it does answer it though. If you want to make it in todays' age, you got to have discipline. Living in a trailer requires discipline. You can have kids when you own a house and can afford to have kids.
This does not address the question.
5 days ago, 03:50 AM
-
#7
- r32gojirra
- Registered NEET
-
- r32gojirra
- Registered NEET
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: East Coast, Australia
- Posts: 39,544
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 597043
-
-
Originally Posted By smallcalves⏩
Out of you and I, only one of us has been selected by nature to pass their genes on to the next generation.
Shut up retard
Think about that, and then think about which of us is more likely to suffer from genetic defects such as retardation.
Your genetics have failed you.
5 days ago, 03:52 AM
-
#8
- smallcalves
- Join Date: Jul, 2026
- Posts: 908
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By r32gojirra⏩
Has nothing to do with the question, fucking imbecile.
Out of you and I, only one of us has been selected by nature to pass their genes on to the next generation.
Think about that, and then think about which of us is more likely to suffer from genetic defects such as retardation.
Your genetics have failed you.
Think about that, and then think about which of us is more likely to suffer from genetic defects such as retardation.
Your genetics have failed you.
5 days ago, 04:03 AM
-
#9
5 days ago, 04:09 AM
-
#10
- smallcalves
- Join Date: Jul, 2026
- Posts: 908
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By ectobruh⏩
Thanks for this exceptional insight.
It's called raising your fucking kids. This isn't rocket science
5 days ago, 05:29 AM
-
#11
- r32gojirra
- Registered NEET
-
- r32gojirra
- Registered NEET
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: East Coast, Australia
- Posts: 39,544
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 597043
-
-
Originally Posted By smallcalves⏩
Maybe it does
Has nothing to do with the question, fucking imbecile.
Maybe it doesn’t
Unfortunately only one of us has been genetically gifted with the intelligence to know
Funny how nature works like that
5 days ago, 05:51 AM
-
#12
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
-
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Cajun Country
- Age: 40
- Height: 5'7"
- Weight: 185 lbs
- Posts: 52,721
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 419660
-
-
The concept you are referring to is “antinatalism”.
It is a reasonable perspective and many people feel it.
On the fundamental level it looks like this:
1. The Asymmetry Argument. Popularized by philosopher David Benatar in his book Better Never to Have Been, this argument highlights a structural imbalance between good and bad experiences:
• Presence of Pain: Is bad.
• Presence of Pleasure: Is good.
• Absence of Pain: Is good, even if that good is not enjoyed by anyone.
• Absence of Pleasure: Is not bad, unless there is someone who is being deprived of that pleasure.
It is a reasonable perspective and many people feel it.
On the fundamental level it looks like this:
1. The Asymmetry Argument. Popularized by philosopher David Benatar in his book Better Never to Have Been, this argument highlights a structural imbalance between good and bad experiences:
• Presence of Pain: Is bad.
• Presence of Pleasure: Is good.
• Absence of Pain: Is good, even if that good is not enjoyed by anyone.
• Absence of Pleasure: Is not bad, unless there is someone who is being deprived of that pleasure.
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“
PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
5 days ago, 05:52 AM
-
#13
5 days ago, 05:57 AM
-
#14
- r32gojirra
- Registered NEET
-
- r32gojirra
- Registered NEET
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: East Coast, Australia
- Posts: 39,544
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 597043
-
-
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
Inceldom is no accident.
The concept you are referring to is “antinatalism”.
It is a reasonable perspective and many people feel it.
On the fundamental level it looks like this:
1. The Asymmetry Argument. Popularized by philosopher David Benatar in his book Better Never to Have Been, this argument highlights a structural imbalance between good and bad experiences:
• Presence of Pain: Is bad.
• Presence of Pleasure: Is good.
• Absence of Pain: Is good, even if that good is not enjoyed by anyone.
• Absence of Pleasure: Is not bad, unless there is someone who is being deprived of that pleasure.
It is a reasonable perspective and many people feel it.
On the fundamental level it looks like this:
1. The Asymmetry Argument. Popularized by philosopher David Benatar in his book Better Never to Have Been, this argument highlights a structural imbalance between good and bad experiences:
• Presence of Pain: Is bad.
• Presence of Pleasure: Is good.
• Absence of Pain: Is good, even if that good is not enjoyed by anyone.
• Absence of Pleasure: Is not bad, unless there is someone who is being deprived of that pleasure.
People holding the beliefs of anti-natalism is no accident.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts