Forum
ยป
The Rothschild Family Deserves Every Penny They Have
05-29-2016, 02:05 PM
-
#121
- midcoastking33
- Registered User
-
- midcoastking33
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2008
- Location: United States
- Posts: 30,048
- Rep Power: 69010
-
-
Originally Posted By Jasonw1178⏩
different means, same end. think brave new worldMarxist logic, or the lack of logic I should say, is where the deeper problem is. The idea that if someone has more, they must have taken it from those who have less in some way. Banking is very profitable, probably the most profitable industry out there. They control that. Money = Power, we get that. Yes they have tons of wealth but they have also created a lot of wealth that we all enjoy. In fact you might be glad they are there because that's all that keeps the governments of the world from going full 1984 on us.
concentrated power is extremely bad for everyone, including those with the power
05-29-2016, 02:08 PM
-
#122
- SeymourGains
- Good Evening Echo
-
- SeymourGains
- Good Evening Echo
- Join Date: Nov 2014
- Posts: 11,616
- Rep Power: 219587
-
-
Originally Posted By BarbellsNBuddha⏩
Tell me about it. The Rothschild are on top and NOT the government like some commie place like china. Some people just cant handle that others have a better grindHaves and Have Nots
We deserve their money
They don't deserve our money
You're all a bunch of *******s
We deserve their money
They don't deserve our money
You're all a bunch of *******s

05-29-2016, 02:40 PM
-
#123
- hermanmunster2
- Banned
-
- hermanmunster2
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2012
- Location: Putin Will Invade, Turkey
- Posts: 7,962
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By BarbellsNBuddha⏩
What have you done t deserve their money?Haves and Have Nots
We deserve their money
They don't deserve our money
You're all a bunch of *******s
We deserve their money
They don't deserve our money
You're all a bunch of *******s

05-29-2016, 03:06 PM
-
#124
- hermanmunster2
- Banned
-
- hermanmunster2
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2012
- Location: Putin Will Invade, Turkey
- Posts: 7,962
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By SeymourGains⏩
Cope at its finestTell me about it. The Rothschild are on top and NOT the government like some commie place like china. Some people just cant handle that others have a better grind
05-29-2016, 05:29 PM
-
#125
- SeymourGains
- Good Evening Echo
-
- SeymourGains
- Good Evening Echo
- Join Date: Nov 2014
- Posts: 11,616
- Rep Power: 219587
-
-
Originally Posted By hermanmunster2⏩
Cope of peace but not prosperityCope at its finest
05-29-2016, 05:32 PM
-
#126
- BorrachoDamor
- Registered User
-
- BorrachoDamor
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2014
- Posts: 14,273
- Rep Power: 13457
-
-
Originally Posted By US_Ranger⏩
You control what you see, what you eat, and what you do.Earned their money? Sure.
Earned the right to be powerful and live the life of luxury? Sure.
Earned the right to control what I see, what I eat, what I do by owning entire government offices? Nope.
There needs to be a separation between government and rich families.
Earned the right to be powerful and live the life of luxury? Sure.
Earned the right to control what I see, what I eat, what I do by owning entire government offices? Nope.
There needs to be a separation between government and rich families.
05-29-2016, 05:44 PM
-
#127
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
-
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Posts: 44,104
- Rep Power: 271274
-
-
Originally Posted By midcoastking33⏩
The US was founded on the idea of minimal government and for the people to choose their leaders. Since the founding fathers retired, it seems that every president has grabbed for more power. They are always passing laws giving them oversight. Think of all the czars that Obama has appointed. Why should the president be allowed to appoint judges, is that not a bit of a violation of the balance of powers? How about positions, such as Secretary of State, which Obama gave to Hillary as a back scratch for stepping down in 2008 and to set her up for this election. Was she the best person for the job? Obviously not.different means, same end. think brave new world
concentrated power is extremely bad for everyone, including those with the power
concentrated power is extremely bad for everyone, including those with the power
05-29-2016, 07:30 PM
-
#128
- hermanmunster2
- Banned
-
- hermanmunster2
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2012
- Location: Putin Will Invade, Turkey
- Posts: 7,962
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Jasonw1178⏩
Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution.The US was founded on the idea of minimal government and for the people to choose their leaders. Since the founding fathers retired, it seems that every president has grabbed for more power. They are always passing laws giving them oversight. Think of all the czars that Obama has appointed. Why should the president be allowed to appoint judges, is that not a bit of a violation of the balance of powers? How about positions, such as Secretary of State, which Obama gave to Hillary as a back scratch for stepping down in 2008 and to set her up for this election. Was she the best person for the job? Obviously not.
The appointments clause.
The founding fathers imagined it that very same way.
Appointing judges for life (and with a salary that may not be reduced) serves to balance the powers.
05-30-2016, 06:09 AM
-
#129
- JustABeginner10
- Registered User
-
- JustABeginner10
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2015
- Age: 30
- Posts: 735
- Rep Power: 159
-
-
lmao op nice try
05-30-2016, 07:54 AM
-
#130
- hermanmunster2
- Banned
-
- hermanmunster2
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2012
- Location: Putin Will Invade, Turkey
- Posts: 7,962
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By JustABeginner10⏩
???lmao op nice try
I'm srs as fuk
05-30-2016, 08:47 AM
-
#131
They didn't earn any of it. They set up banks and standardized them along with usury through collaboration with the monarchs and governments at the time, which the governments had no right too because it was a choice meant to be made by the people and not a few people in government. This allowed the family through debt enslavement to swallow up real assets from the government that was actually meant for the people.
Also they don't need money now because the own the system in which it operates.
Also they don't need money now because the own the system in which it operates.
05-30-2016, 08:56 AM
-
#132
Originally Posted By khyber6⏩
99% of those people couldn't afford the assets they were acquiring anyway.They didn't earn any of it. They set up banks and standardized them along with usury through collaboration with the monarchs and governments at the time, which the governments had no right too because it was a choice meant to be made by the people and not a few people in government. This allowed the family through debt enslavement to swallow up real assets from the government that was actually meant for the people.
Also they don't need money now because the own the system in which it operates.
Also they don't need money now because the own the system in which it operates.
05-30-2016, 09:19 AM
-
#133
Originally Posted By IH8RICE⏩
They were assets for the people and realistically owned by the people considering that people paid for them through taxes. But I guess when one side has guns and an army there isn't much you can do about it.99% of those people couldn't afford the assets they were acquiring anyway.
05-30-2016, 09:20 AM
-
#134
- hermanmunster2
- Banned
-
- hermanmunster2
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2012
- Location: Putin Will Invade, Turkey
- Posts: 7,962
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By khyber6⏩
So creating the banks and increasing the ability to do international trade was not worthy of their fortune?They didn't earn any of it. They set up banks and standardized them along with usury through collaboration with the monarchs and governments at the time, which the governments had no right too because it was a choice meant to be made by the people and not a few people in government. This allowed the family through debt enslavement to swallow up real assets from the government that was actually meant for the people.
Also they don't need money now because the own the system in which it operates.
Also they don't need money now because the own the system in which it operates.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts