positive crew

lol number 1 threat to a women is her own friends


they love to give each other chitty advice too like cutting their hair short n chit or get tattoos or get piercings

anything to make them uglier.

guys does this mean i should feel bad for being 18 and virgin? like so virgin ive only kissed once.

Don't feel "bad" but understand this:

There exists a world out there that some people arenotexperiencing; where hot women are spreading their pussies, "competing" with other females, and letting cool/handsome/popular/rich guys cum inside their vagina. It's a known fact that most people know, but forveralones/losers/nerds sometimes aren't letting it sink in:There is an entirely different world out there, and we (you) (us) aren't part of it.

so what world are we in? should we go for girls who are only 5-7/10?

The average-nobody world:

Heated, unprotected one-night-stands are a rarity.

Hot girls will never compete with their friends tofuck you (as discussed in the original post of this thread) Such a concept is foreign to us, something out of a fairy-tale.

Maximum-effort must be taken, tosometimesland average girlfriends or wives or get sex.

Yeah, because you're a loser IRL that has no SMV and you know this. Guaranteed the second guys wanted to fuk you, the second you had bitches competing with you, would be the second you became one of these competitive hoes. You're a nobody, but once you became a somebody your true nature would come out.

Women are passive-aggressive, and are like this for a reason. One being so they can renege on everything they've said and shift blame onto their accuser. You may not pick up on the subtleties of female behaviour, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist and isn't proper prevalent in the 'adult world'. Women don't mature much past 16; I've seen plenty of adult hoes slutting around and retaining an entitled persona well into their 40's.

Holy crap you sound bitter with life lol. I guess I can consider myself lucky that neither myself, nor my friends, and again, nor most of the adult female population that I've witnessed, became "somebody" and turned into a competitive hoe.

I'm happy with my good relationship and good friends, if that makes me a nobody then so be it.

That's right, sweetheart. Try to make me mad by calling me bitter; I'll definitely cave from the anger.

I've dealt with women trying to dismiss arguments that they can't understand for awhile, now. You aren't the first person to try and pull the 'bitter' line and try to change the context of my argument, you won't be the last. Again, your basic nature just came out there, and you're trying to tell me it wouldn't if you were actually desirable and not a complete loser online? Vanessa, please.

Short hair is so phucking groce. I swear, what in the phuck are they thinking?

I wasn't trying to make you anything, just stating that your post sounded really bitter, which it did.

But please, cry more about how I'm a nobody because I'm happy and have quality relationships/friendships instead of being somebody and being miserable with a group of friends who hate each other like I apparently should be.

A child also thinks a parent is being mean when they've been grounded for fighting their sibling. Perspective matters; You'll obviously find anything short of arsekissing to be 'bitter'. Don't kid yourself; You know exactly what you were doing, and so do I.

Let me repost:
I've dealt with women trying to dismiss arguments that they can't understand for awhile, now. You aren't the first person to try and pull the 'bitter' line and try to change the context of my argument, you won't be the last. Again, your basic nature just came out there, and you're trying to tell me it wouldn't if you were actually desirable and not a complete loser online? Vanessa, please.

You keep showing your true colours while trying to maintain the position that you're any different. You're not special; You're as basic as all these other women are, you've just never been given the opportunity to show it. I'm giving the opportunity to you, now, and you aren't disappointing. Keep digging yourself a deeper hole.. I'm sure your WK's will come rescue you soon.

Back in my lesser aware days my sociology professor told me the main different when it comes to women and men. Take for example a group of 5 females and one of those females has a boyfriend/husband who is accomplished while the other 4 are single or have boyfriends/husbands that aren't as successful or good looking than their own partners. Those 4 women wish they could have her man and if the opportunity arose they would jump to be with him and take him away from her even though they claim to be best friends.

Now take a group of 5 men who are friends and the exact same scenario as the one of the group of females except with girlfriends/wives. The other men don't wish they had his specific girlfriend/wife but rather a girl like her. Instead they congratulate him and ask him for tips in finding a girlfriend/wife like the one he has.

In short women don't have honour even when it involves supposed lifelong friends.

So calling me a loser etc is fine, but me calling you bitter is passive aggressive and an attempt to make you angry? Ok. If anything calling me things like sweetheart seems rather passive aggressive.

Anyway, as I said earlier, this thread wasn't initially about women's "basic nature" so I'm not commenting on that, it was about how women view the world, I am just stating that that is not how I view the world, and from observation it seems like many/most other women don't also.

Saying that all women are like this is no different to feminists saying that all men are pigs.

But in the end I'm not going to change your mind, you can keep believing you know more than me about what I think if you want. What I don't really understand is that you seem to think I should want to be miserable over being happy. I think most people if given the choice would pick happy.

Is this something you believe in because you've been betrayed a lot before?

You calling me bitter is based on your emotion, a knee jerk reaction to me calling you a loser. Me calling you a loser is based around you admitting to having a shiite social life and that you don't get out much. One is based on fact, the other an emotional response. Sorry that you can't tolerate strong language, but that's not my problem.There's absolutely no difference between a woman's basic nature and how women see the world. You're arguing semantics at this point, and not arguing the actual point.. so stop trying to act like you're not arguing the same thing.One is based around observation and facts, the other is based around emotional response and the psychological issue of penis envy. Those feminists that say all men are pigs are saying so because they hate that they were born women, despite what they want to admit. Guys saying 'generally women do x' is an observation, and the context is not demonizing but coming to an understanding.And now you're changing the context of my argument again, only this time making it so non sequitur that anybody with half a brain would see you made that up yourself because you have no bloody clue what to argue.


Like I've said, you are displaying the quintessential female behaviour, and yet while using the same tactics other women use you are trying to argue you aren't the same. You've been slighted the opportunity to really flourish, and with this very simple interaction I've brought out the basic in you. My point still stands. Sidenote: If you want to try to change my mind, first try to form a coherent, impacting argument.

Well, what do you want me to say? I don't have any proof,nor have I ever claimed to, nor am I inclined to look for any that it's not womens basic nature. All I'm stating is that's not how I personally view the world which is fact, and that in my observation plenty of other women don't either, though that is just my observation and I can't say that's fact with any more certainty than you can say it's fact that you know what I think better than I.

Is this because I have a chit social life with a small group of good friends rather than a large group of "friends"? Maybe, but I can't see why I'd want to change that for the worse. If I had a friend that started pulling that chit I'd cut them out and I'd expect the same if I suddenly started acting like that.

Edit:
I'm not too sure why we are even debating this to be honest. I'm talking about my thoughts on how I view the world which is impossible for me to physically prove and equally as impossible for you to disprove. Plus you've already agreed that I'm quite possibly telling the truth when I say that that is my view on the world, based on your opinion of me being a nobody loser.

As I've said, my views on the world probably are shaped by how my life is now, the same as everyone else's views on the world are based on their life experiences. But again, I can't see why I would want to change that for the worse just so I can be "somebody".

So I'm going to leave it at that instead of us both going in circles when we really have nothing to argue over.

OP is right.

Women are not actually attracted to men. There is a vague idea of what a man is physically, and some are better than others aesthetically speaking, but the purely physical appearance of a man is almost inconsequential unless he is horribly ugly or outrageously attractive.

Women are attracted to status, money, how much a man smiles and laughs, how many friends and resources a man has, how full a man's life is--how many "cool," "exciting" and prestigious things he is doing or connected to.

They are interested in how other people view him--how many people want to be around him, how other people interact with him and whether their interactions convey that he is special and amazing. They want him to be extremely outgoing and aggressive, they want him to demonstrate his status over other people by dominating them in various non-violent ways.

A woman's attraction to a man is a function of her jealousy at the thought of another woman having that man. She doesn't care who he actually is or EXACTLY what he looks like physically, she only cares about the VALUE of the life he has constructed around himself.

A woman basically is a greedy materialistic prostitute. Although that sounds vulgar, it's true. She trades her physical self to buy into the success a man has created for himself.

lol.

Do you know what's the difference between a male best friend and a female best friend?

The male best friend is introduced to his best friend's girlfriend and thinks "Wow! She's pretty, funny and smart! I have to get a girl just like her!"

The female best friend is introduced to her best friend's boyfriend and thinks "Wow! He's handsome, funny and smart! I want him!"

This girl who I've been talking to legitimately has like 1 female friend. Same with a lot of other girls I've know. Women are a lot more competitive/negative towards each other than men are in my opinion. You'd be suprised

Good lawd. You know if you ever said that to a chicks face you would be sent down for murder. What a way to shatter a sloots confidence.

i thought you considered the misc to be a large group of good friends

Lol. At least on the misc we talk chit to each others faces (so to speak)

This is how women see the world.

jacknicholsonnodding.gif

from my experience sloots with only one real female friend are less promiscuous, slooty etc., i mean they have other female friends but this one is the closest and they spend majority of free time together.
the bigger the group, sloots get more competitive = more slooty.

oh man that is the worst. I feel like I want to show this thread to my gf now. Like see... DONT EVER START THINKING THIS IS OK LOLFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUK

All women that think like that are scum and I want nothing to do with them. I have no sympathy for them. They can all rot in hell.