ok so hes gonna stop interfering around the world when it comes to getting involved with things like the israel but when it comes to a militant group hell bent on killing americans were goin to war

theres a difference

Would probably vote for Johnson, the man has integrity.

The only people who support trump are "cucks". He's also a huge supporter of the whole lgbt movement and the transgender people.

No it's not. He's literally been advocating for war and he said he is Israel's biggest supporter. On top of that he wants to kill women and children. Good luck with that only some dumb mofo would be okay with that.I don't agree with a lot of his views but I can respect a man that has integrity. If voting for him means that trump will lose then I will vote for johnson.

who tf are you kidding mate? you aint even leaving your bedroom

This literally makes zero sense. You should be voting for Hillary if you want Trump to lose.

Hmmm sure thing bud.To people who lack common sense it doesn't make sense but good luck.

agreed.

clinton is pro war and is in bed with the jews, rothschild. fuk that bitch.

sander is a massive traitor so TRUMP!!!!!!!!!

i find clinton supporters much more blind and beta cucks than trump supporters.

the sad part is clinton is paying alot of people to vote for her when they dont want to.

the media doesnt even try to hide bias anymore.

The most ridiculous part about this .gif is not that he's dumbbell benching with 200lb dumbbells its the fact that his arms are so big that he's using knee braces as elbow braces.

I know right? heaven forbid someone exercises their right to vote for a candidate based on principle and not because of a popularity contest or because its the "lesser of two evils"

Its people voting for the Lo2E thats consistently giving us chitty candidates in the primaries, and chitty presidents elect.

He keeps saying all he wants is for Trump to lose. Voting for Johnson doesn't help cause.

Yes, I know that the government is designed on the concept of checks and balances. But let's be honest - the political climate in this country is anything but honest; even Putin states on international television that America can't even do politics right. Presidents have always managed to extend their reach of power, inappropriately, in terms of this harness. What comes to my mind is Trump's threats to overturn libel laws against the media. Now, as crooked and misleading as the media is - they're still granted the right of the first amendment are they not? If he does such, he infringes on the powers set in stone to limit a president's power. If he can do this, do you think any form of checks and balances means anything to him? He is a dishonest bigot. Watch how he trashes other people on a national stage (aka the other candidates). He literally makes up sh!t and spins the craziest bullsh!t stories about others (Cruz, Sanders). Next thing we know the fkn Enquirer is passing them as fact. And jee, most Americans aren't able to analyze the validity of the bs they're reading.

1. I say slums in the sense that without money - people need to resort to living in destitute situations. Aka, with no welfare - they need to resort to such. This is only - and I mean only - what I mean when I say welfare. If someone can't afford the costs of standard living - they will resort to substandard living conditions. Such are 'slums'.
2. Having an incentive implies that you have a strong work ethic behind everything. Now, do you honestly think that in America - the the majority of people on welfare have strong work ethic? As in, they see an incentive and they'll reach out to grab it. Let's be real here, this has become a country where people try to get as much as possible by doing as little as possible. You stance requires 2 things: there to be an incentive, along with a drive to achieve that incentive. The former may be true but I seriously doubt the latter.
3. I have absolutely never said I support increasing - or doubling - minimum wage. Such would be a disaster waiting to happen. Basic principles of economics can be used to deduce this.
4. Free degrees? Why would anyone do that? What makes you think that I am for this at all? Education should be attainable for those with a with strong drive to pursue it. Really, the bankers should not be exploiting college students in terms of school loans. However, education should not be 'free' per say. Further, 'free degrees' implies you do absolutely no work either. Such is pathetic and illogical.

If you want the cliffs notes
1. Limitations set for presidents are not crossed by honest people. Does Trump seem like an honest man to you?
2. Impoverished people on welfare largely see incentive but majorly lack the drive to achieve incentive. Americans want as much as possible for as little work as possible. Welfare is abused - but can't be changed. It is by far too late for this; Americans would resort to violence before ever considering developing work ethic - having free access to guns makes it even easier.
3. I've absolutely never implied increasing minimum wage is logical. Such would be an unmitigated disaster. I don't know why you think I'm for this.
4. Free degrees? For one, banks should NOT attempt to exploit students by their loans - but it should by no means by free. A group of idiots, for whom becoming intelligent is expensive - will forever remain idiots. I don't know why or how you think I support 'free degrees'.
If the guy is further in the lead than Stein, he's got my vote.
Regardless, I don't agree with his ideas for Medicare.Why would ANY logical and intelligent person want to feel responsible for Trump's actions? He could potentially destroy America, or simply many of the foundations by which it stands.

Get out of here you guys with this LO2E bs. Seriously. The logic is just completely void in these statements.
My sh!t is literally more cohesive than whatever logic concluded with this statement.
It's complete trash. And exemplifies American sub-par intelligence.

It's voting for people like Johnson or Stein that is literally the only hope for a successful future for America. At least America could very well stay stagnant, rather than plummeting like Japanese Kamikaze. I mean sure, you get the job done in the end - but you've literally destroyed everything else.

Whoa, had no idea Melania speaks five languages. That's impressive.