Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » LMFAO @ Russia's poverty Navy (PICS)
  1. Results 91 to 120 of 213
  2. Page 4 of 8
  3. First
  5. 2
  6. 3
  7. 4
  8. 5
  9. 6
  11. Last

Thread: LMFAO @ Russia's poverty Navy (PICS)

post 1467516321 10-21-2016, 08:19 AM
-
#91
  1. JPF82
  2. Registered User
  1. JPF82
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Location: South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 19,869
  6. Rep Power: 63172
Originally Posted By kusok⏩
lmao Americans can't beat a few towelheads in caves in Afghanistan. Let's challenge a nuclear superpower which kicked everyone's ass for a thousands years. Kicked so badly that greatest military minds in history like Napoleon were crying and saying they never saw anything like this.
Kinda hard when you're so 2 thousand and late, and we so 3 thousand and 8
post 1467516551 10-21-2016, 08:20 AM
-
#92
  1. CityJaeger
  2. Registered User
  1. CityJaeger
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2015
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 4,364
  6. Rep Power: 28698
Lol at busta bragging about UK where the most alpha being there are women : Margareth and Theresa cucking you buch of weakling british *******s with no balls that had let your territories become Islamabad or Peshawar.You could have the best military gears in the world but there are no men left if UK to fight your wars.
post 1467517241 10-21-2016, 08:25 AM
-
#93
  1. JPF82
  2. Registered User
  1. JPF82
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Location: South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 19,869
  6. Rep Power: 63172
Originally Posted By CityJaeger⏩
Lol at busta bragging about UK where the most alpha being there are women : Margareth and Theresa cucking you buch of weakling british *******s with no balls that had let your territories become Islamabad or Peshawar.You could have the best military gears in the world but there are no men left if UK to fight your wars.
Busta is a mailman bruh, its a very important jerb.....hes very vital for the livelihood of UK, leave Busta alone
post 1467517661 10-21-2016, 08:29 AM
-
#94
  1. CLEAN_SET_OF_10
  2. MFC + NHL + R/P
  1. CLEAN_SET_OF_10
  2. MFC + NHL + R/P
  3. Join Date: Jul 2007
  4. Posts: 18,273
  5. Rep Power: 42159
At least they aren't afraid to turn ****li pirates into fish food with their navy.

It isn't all about flashy tech. In the end they have alpha men at the helm loading shells and elbow deep with a wrench in the diesel propulsion whereas there is probably a transsexual hipster with a joystick and VR goggles operating the US ship.. and it's probably "green energy hybrid" *******s propulsion.

I'd rather die at sea fighting alongside the real men.
"I'd rather be judged by 12 than be out my watch and wallet"
post 1467518151 10-21-2016, 08:33 AM
-
#95
  1. JPF82
  2. Registered User
  1. JPF82
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Location: South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 19,869
  6. Rep Power: 63172
Originally Posted By CLEAN_SET_OF_10⏩
At least they aren't afraid to turn ****li pirates into fish food with their navy.

It isn't all about flashy tech. In the end they have alpha men at the helm loading shells and elbow deep with a wrench in the diesel propulsion whereas there is probably a transsexual hipster with a joystick and VR goggles operating the US ship..

I'd rather die at sea fighting alongside the real men.
USA may not do this, we hire contractors to turn them into fish food because then we are not seen as emotionless, heartless pricks like Russia is seen as.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uCVCRZLIn8






https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-VEYXDbOSM
post 1467518291 10-21-2016, 08:34 AM
-
#96
  1. PimpinisEasy
  2. Registered User
  1. PimpinisEasy
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 11,587
  6. Rep Power: 3465
UK brah checking in.

We may have a bit mroe ancy kit, but Russia would still push our chit in, in any kind of conflict.

brb metrosexuals
brb **** culture
brb DYEL physique on 90% of men
brb remainers
post 1467518941 10-21-2016, 08:41 AM
-
#97
  1. 4Adz4
  2. ay cuzz
  1. 4Adz4
  2. ay cuzz
  3. Join Date: Dec 2014
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 30
  6. Posts: 4,180
  7. Rep Power: 5810
Originally Posted By sv722⏩
Lettuce be real here Busta, i don't think the UK would stand a chance against the Russians and the US Navy has all the best toys.
In conventional war the UK will always be powerful, highly trained, most of the best technology and equipment, we're on an island which is a huge advantage, and we have a good amount of conscriptable manpower (not comparatively to China/Russia obv)

Only time we're gonna get ****ed is if it's a nuclear war.
RIP BIG RICHARD
post 1467519491 10-21-2016, 08:44 AM
-
#98
  1. ssg10587
  2. Philosophizer
  1. ssg10587
  2. Philosophizer
  3. Join Date: Oct 2011
  4. Posts: 5,307
  5. Rep Power: 43848
Originally Posted By LethalGunz34⏩
US has the best military in the world. Nobody can touch us.
This. Our tech is miles beyond anyone else.

game over:


"Act as if what you do makes a difference. It does." -William James

My positivity thread: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=172531971&p=1464356701#post1464356701
My experiments with no soap and cold showers: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=173382601
balding journey: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=174082771&p=1505298321#post1505298321
post 1467519991 10-21-2016, 08:48 AM
-
#99
  1. PimpinisEasy
  2. Registered User
  1. PimpinisEasy
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 11,587
  6. Rep Power: 3465
Originally Posted By ssg10587⏩
This. Our tech is miles beyond anyone else.

game over:


Except Afghani goat herders right?

Imagine if you didn't have all that kit, they'd crush you.
post 1467520061 10-21-2016, 08:48 AM
-
#100
  1. Reliance012
  2. Registered User
  1. Reliance012
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2012
  4. Posts: 7,601
  5. Rep Power: 51600
Originally Posted By kusok⏩
lmao Americans can't beat a few towelheads in caves in Afghanistan. Let's challenge a nuclear superpower which kicked everyone's ass for a thousands years. Kicked so badly that greatest military minds in history like Napoleon were crying and saying they never saw anything like this.
Poor thing
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
post 1467520261 10-21-2016, 08:50 AM
-
#101
  1. gharlow
  2. Pumpin' N Humpin'
  1. gharlow
  2. Pumpin' N Humpin'
  3. Join Date: Sep 2007
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 42
  6. Posts: 2,693
  7. Rep Power: 18090
I'm sure they're deadly as fuk, but I hate the look of modern war machines.

WW2 era stuff looked so much cooler than anything I've seen in this thread. It must have been insane to see a ship on the horizon and just start lobbing 2,500 lb bombs at each other.
*MFCi*
Crybaby crew
Full blown meltdown crew
They hurt my feels crew
post 1467521331 10-21-2016, 08:58 AM
-
#102
  1. The_Albatross
  2. Registered User
  1. The_Albatross
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2008
  4. Age: 42
  5. Posts: 8,279
  6. Rep Power: 6533
Originally Posted By SadBoys⏩
Just LOL at miscers suddenly becoming war generals and laughing at whole world as soon as some ******* makes a war thread while their biggest life achievement is lifting some weights in a gym.


This happens everytime military technology or capability is mentioned on the misc. Becomes a dick measuring contest via posts with pictures of ships, tanks, and fighter jets.

one cannot be betrayed if one has no people.
post 1467521791 10-21-2016, 09:03 AM
-
#103
  1. MajesticLion
  2. fidélité à la mort
  1. MajesticLion
  2. fidélité à la mort
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 18,671
  6. Rep Power: 67123
Originally Posted By JeenyusJr⏩
tfw Marko Ramius is lying in wait under dem waves
This.

Good luck tracking the subs.
post 1467521851 10-21-2016, 09:03 AM
-
#104
  1. xxAchillesxx
  1. xxAchillesxx
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Posts: 19,524
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 389868
Originally Posted By PimpinisEasy⏩
Except Afghani goat herders right?

Imagine if you didn't have all that kit, they'd crush you.
So imagine everyone in the world just fought in hand to hand combat? Anything beyond that can be considered "technology".
"The dildo of consequences rarely arrives lubed."

See OptimusTrajan' sig
post 1467522081 10-21-2016, 09:05 AM
-
#105
  1. LexBrah
  2. Registered User
  1. LexBrah
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 5,304
  7. Rep Power: 58960
Originally Posted By ldurham20⏩
The only advantage china would have is their population.
US & it's allies - UK, Canada, Japan, Germany, France, Australia, etc. would still have the military superiority to win the war.

Let us not forget that Japan singlehandedly handled Russia in the Russo-Japanese war.
I was talking country for country. Obviously NATO would rape everyone. That's irrelevant.
Originally Posted By sharepass11⏩
our military budget vs everyones else


Military budget doesnt = winning wars.

Look at the military budget for the Vietkong (who won) or the afghan goat herders using sugar/weed kill bombs (who won).

Chinese military technology is hardly even released to the world. America always brags about stuff. China keep their stuff secret.

Also chinese population WAY bigger than US.

Look at how the russian population helped in WW2. 30% of their soldiers didnt even have guns or ammo and were just charging at the enemy.
post 1467522501 10-21-2016, 09:09 AM
-
#106
  1. gixxer0.6g
  2. Maximum Effort
  1. gixxer0.6g
  2. Maximum Effort
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Montana, United States
  5. Posts: 43,865
  6. Rep Power: 266599
The only thing that matters. Look at the tiny micro penis of nukes the UK has. Poor little guy

Toxic Masculinity
post 1467525851 10-21-2016, 09:36 AM
-
#107
  1. GenghisBro
  2. Banned
  1. GenghisBro
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 5,866
  6. Rep Power: 0
I always thought war was won by the side who is the more intelligent with their military tactics, than just the people who have the best technology. The Mongols and Huns didn't have the best technology I'd say, as the civilizations they fought were technically more advanced than them, they just had superior tactics during the battlefield that crushed their enemies.
post 1467540931 10-21-2016, 11:33 AM
-
#108
  1. TheAmericano
  2. because MERICA that's why
  1. TheAmericano
  2. because MERICA that's why
  3. Join Date: May 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 11,802
  6. Rep Power: 12087
lol just LOL @ non-AMericans who are obsess with what's going on in our county when we could give 2 chits about whats going in theirs.

Maybe if you guys stop worry about us and start focusing on your own country, you'll have a decent, worth mentioning home land!



- Merica
- I'm sorry; I couldn't hear your complaints over the sound of all this freedom!

~ Merica


- Everybody wants to make it, but nobody wants to put in the work!
post 1467542591 10-21-2016, 11:45 AM
-
#109
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
Originally Posted By RockyIV⏩
New US Destroyer

lmao, looks cool, but the fact that part of it is made out of fukin plastic (composite) just kills it for me.

willing to bet a my life a ww2 destroyer could take 10x the punisment that would sink that pretty boat and still float
post 1467543131 10-21-2016, 11:49 AM
-
#110
  1. y0lked
  2. CEO 10k/yr
  1. y0lked
  2. CEO 10k/yr
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Location: Sacramento, California, United States
  5. Posts: 11,833
  6. Rep Power: 23214
plus we got this guy
Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist (NSCA)

**Dallas Cowboys**
**Sacramento Kings**
**San Jose Sharks**
post 1467543721 10-21-2016, 11:53 AM
-
#111
  1. Lefticle
  2. Registered User
  1. Lefticle
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Height: 6'1"
  5. Weight: 225 lbs
  6. Posts: 29,430
  7. Subscribers: 1
  8. Rep Power: 571788
Originally Posted By gluon⏩
lmao, looks cool, but the fact that part of it is made out of fukin plastic (composite) just kills it for me.

willing to bet a my life a ww2 destroyer could take 10x the punisment that would sink that pretty boat and still float
LOL @ your knowledge of materials

There are polymers now that are harder than titanium
Always Neg Back Crew.
post 1467543871 10-21-2016, 11:54 AM
-
#112
  1. LikeAMachine
  2. Known Browns Fan
  1. LikeAMachine
  2. Known Browns Fan
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Location: Columbus, Ohio, United States
  5. Posts: 24,099
  6. Rep Power: 52838
Don't need to be aesthetic to shoot nukes.
(っ◕‿◕)っ
post 1467544111 10-21-2016, 11:55 AM
-
#113
  1. Bassackwards
  2. Registered User
  1. Bassackwards
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Honolulu, Hawaii, Chad
  5. Posts: 19,572
  6. Rep Power: 42651
Originally Posted By ldurham20⏩
Probably more concerned with the nearly 1800 active nuclear warheads they have.
and the diesel subs that carry some of them
US Navy Veteran
eats sriracha with everything
^^VV<><> BA Start
post 1467544681 10-21-2016, 12:00 PM
-
#114
  1. JPF82
  2. Registered User
  1. JPF82
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Location: South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 19,869
  6. Rep Power: 63172
Originally Posted By LexBrah⏩
Chinese military technology is hardly even released to the world. America always brags about stuff. China keep their stuff secret.
Oh ye of little knowledge.


We know what they know and they know what we know. You think we are not being hacked on a consistent basis and us hacking China on the reg? Spy satellites and such?

come off it brah.....
post 1467544891 10-21-2016, 12:01 PM
-
#115
  1. JPF82
  2. Registered User
  1. JPF82
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Location: South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 19,869
  6. Rep Power: 63172
http://i.imgur.com/mMyzw6H.jpg
post 1467544981 10-21-2016, 12:02 PM
-
#116
  1. GreekyBeth
  2. I yam what I yam
  1. GreekyBeth
  2. I yam what I yam
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: Palm Harbor, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 7,611
  6. Rep Power: 110497
Originally Posted By BustaCapp⏩
..pity they can't afford a new gasket for their carrier exhaust

They can't perfect their jet fuel mix. They were blowing the same black soot out of their stacks back in '87 when I was in the Black Sea on a destroyer.

Still believe they can't refuel underway either---something the US and its NATO allies have been doing for years. Could be wrong on this though.

It's the subs we have to worry about. Excellent engineering there.
FSU "Go Noles!"
post 1467545681 10-21-2016, 12:07 PM
-
#117
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
Originally Posted By Lefticle⏩
LOL @ your knowledge of materials

There are polymers now that are harder than titanium
lmao at your knowledge of material science.

Hardness tells you almost nothing about a materials ability to withstand impacts, hard materials are also usually brittle and you need some ductility and high yield strain in impact absorption, composites have 0 ductility and low yield strain.

you can take your harder to scratch composite, ill take scratched up battle tested steel
post 1467546181 10-21-2016, 12:11 PM
-
#118
  1. anonymous
  2. Guest
  1. anonymous
  2. Guest
  3. Join Date:
  4. Posts: 12,500
  5. Rep Power: 1
post 1467547531 10-21-2016, 12:21 PM
-
#119
  1. JrM703
  2. Registered User
  1. JrM703
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: District Of Columbia, United States
  5. Posts: 12,078
  6. Rep Power: 31266
American checking in...

While much of our hardware is better than the Russians the real numbers that count is nuclear arsenal.
If it didn't matter than we wouldn't of allowed them to invade Georgia (Former U.S.S.R. Satellite Nation) and the Ukraine, without doing much of anything.

America's head-to-head non-nuclear arsenal also is meaningless if we don't have leadership willing to utilize it correctly, see last 8 years. The Russians obviously have no problem doing so.

post 1467547621 10-21-2016, 12:22 PM
-
#120
  1. Jax05
  2. Tuna, No Crust
  1. Jax05
  2. Tuna, No Crust
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Posts: 26,055
  5. Rep Power: 91463
Originally Posted By gluon⏩
lmao at your knowledge of material science.

Hardness tells you almost nothing about a materials ability to withstand impacts, hard materials are also usually brittle and you need some ductility and high yield strain in impact absorption, composites have 0 ductility and low yield strain.

you can take your harder to scratch composite, ill take scratched up battle tested steel
Age: 27

knows more than US Navy about which materials to use for building destroyers.

Originally Posted By JrM703⏩
real numbers that count is nuclear arsenal.
Not really. There's only so many nukes you can fire before it doesn't even matter any more.
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit softly.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts