Forum
»
97% of College Kids Cant Answer this Basic Question Correctly
12-06-2016, 09:18 AM
-
#181
- MrDeafMuscle
- Token Deaf Guy
-
- MrDeafMuscle
- Token Deaf Guy
- Join Date: May 2011
- Location: Florida, United States
- Posts: 7,232
- Rep Power: 12459
-
-
Originally Posted By chroneos⏩
Was that your answer to every SAT question?Isn't this just a poorly written question that is not specific enough to be accurately answered
12-06-2016, 09:19 AM
-
#182
- mrmk5110
- Chillflix and Net
-
- mrmk5110
- Chillflix and Net
- Join Date: Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,384
- Rep Power: 4008
-
-
Originally Posted By Bothang⏩
So what? He used the same 100 to buy the good, and when he gives it to the shop owner the shop owner puts it back into the register. At that point the shop owner is even. The shop owner starts to lose the money when he gives the good to the robber (whatever the cogs was) plus the change.He didn't give it back, he used to to buy something. Could have been him or any other customer.
Praise the Helix Fossil
*6'4" Master Race Crew*
BPL: Liverpool
NHL: Flyers
IG: _markatron
Follow and I'll follow back
12-06-2016, 09:20 AM
-
#183
- MuckSnapper
- Bearded Princess
-
- MuckSnapper
- Bearded Princess
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Posts: 17,959
- Rep Power: 46739
-
-
Originally Posted By mrmk5110⏩
So potate right now.So what? He used the same 100 to buy the good, and when he gives it to the shop owner the shop owner puts it back into the register. At that point the shop owner is even. The shop owner starts to lose the money when he gives the good to the robber (whatever the cogs was) plus the change.
Think bro think
There is no thing without nothing.
_____________________________________
MCC TAutist dicord: https://discord.gg/nX2fBRu
12-06-2016, 09:20 AM
-
#184
- mrmk5110
- Chillflix and Net
-
- mrmk5110
- Chillflix and Net
- Join Date: Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,384
- Rep Power: 4008
-
-
Originally Posted By MuckSnapper⏩
Alright then you explain it to me.So potate right now.
Think bro think
Think bro think
Praise the Helix Fossil
*6'4" Master Race Crew*
BPL: Liverpool
NHL: Flyers
IG: _markatron
Follow and I'll follow back
12-06-2016, 09:21 AM
-
#185
12-06-2016, 09:21 AM
-
#186
- MuckSnapper
- Bearded Princess
-
- MuckSnapper
- Bearded Princess
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Posts: 17,959
- Rep Power: 46739
-
-
Originally Posted By mrmk5110⏩
We've tried. Quite a bit lolAlright then you explain it to me.
Putting that 100 back is irrelevant. Whether he came back and paid with a card or a different 100 dollar bill is irrelevant. The new transaction is irrelevant. The drawer is short $100 dollars because it was taken.
There is no thing without nothing.
_____________________________________
MCC TAutist dicord: https://discord.gg/nX2fBRu
12-06-2016, 09:22 AM
-
#187
- keels141
- Registered User
-
- keels141
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2008
- Location: Australia
- Age: 41
- Posts: 6,469
- Rep Power: 35966
-
-
Originally Posted By MuckSnapper⏩
Er, I'm not sure. I would like to consult Enguin for a second opinion on this.They were robbed of 100 dollars. End of story. The transaction afterwards has nothing to do with anything. Just confuses you.
They were robbed of 100 dollars. End of story. The transaction afterwards has nothing to do with anything. Just confuses you.
They were robbed of 100 dollars. End of story. The transaction afterwards has nothing to do with anything. Just confuses you.
They were robbed of 100 dollars. End of story. The transaction afterwards has nothing to do with anything. Just confuses you.
They were robbed of 100 dollars. End of story. The transaction afterwards has nothing to do with anything. Just confuses you.
They were robbed of 100 dollars. End of story. The transaction afterwards has nothing to do with anything. Just confuses you.
They were robbed of 100 dollars. End of story. The transaction afterwards has nothing to do with anything. Just confuses you.
They were robbed of 100 dollars. End of story. The transaction afterwards has nothing to do with anything. Just confuses you.
They were robbed of 100 dollars. End of story. The transaction afterwards has nothing to do with anything. Just confuses you.
They were robbed of 100 dollars. End of story. The transaction afterwards has nothing to do with anything. Just confuses you.
They were robbed of 100 dollars. End of story. The transaction afterwards has nothing to do with anything. Just confuses you.
I mean, the theif took $100 dollars, but then the owner paid for the $70 out of his own money, so straight away the owner is down $170. Then the owner gives him another $30 as change, but then the theif got the $100 + $70 from the original transaction. So that is imediately $270 that the thief is out of pocket. But then take into account the cost of the owner buying the actual stock, add $70 to that again.
And let's not forget about the theif stealing the $100 in the first place. $100; $70: $30 change. Man you guys are so stupid, I can't believe you are this old and still don't understnad the basics of money

***Trapped on prison island crew***
12-06-2016, 09:23 AM
-
#188
- MuckSnapper
- Bearded Princess
-
- MuckSnapper
- Bearded Princess
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Posts: 17,959
- Rep Power: 46739
-
-
Originally Posted By keels141⏩
Jesus potatoes you guys really aren't thinking clearly.Er, I'm not sure. I would like to consult Enguin for a second opinion on this.
I mean, the theif took $100 dollars, but then the owner paid for the $70 out of his own money, so straight away the owner is down $170. Then the owner gives him another $30 as change, but then the theif got the $100 + $70 from the original transaction. So that is imediately $270 that the thief is out of pocket. But then take into account the cost of the owner buying the actual stock, add $70 to that again.
And let's not forget about the theif stealing the $100 in the first place. $100; $70: $30 change. Man you guys are so stupid, I can't believe you are this old and still don't understnad the basics of money
I mean, the theif took $100 dollars, but then the owner paid for the $70 out of his own money, so straight away the owner is down $170. Then the owner gives him another $30 as change, but then the theif got the $100 + $70 from the original transaction. So that is imediately $270 that the thief is out of pocket. But then take into account the cost of the owner buying the actual stock, add $70 to that again.
And let's not forget about the theif stealing the $100 in the first place. $100; $70: $30 change. Man you guys are so stupid, I can't believe you are this old and still don't understnad the basics of money

There is no thing without nothing.
_____________________________________
MCC TAutist dicord: https://discord.gg/nX2fBRu
12-06-2016, 09:23 AM
-
#189
- mrmk5110
- Chillflix and Net
-
- mrmk5110
- Chillflix and Net
- Join Date: Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,384
- Rep Power: 4008
-
-
Originally Posted By MuckSnapper⏩
How is putting 100 back into the register not relevant???We've tried. Quite a bit lol
Putting that 100 back is irrelevant. Whether he came back and paid with a card or a different 100 dollar bill is irrelevant. The new transaction is irrelevant. The drawer is short $100 dollars because it was taken.
Putting that 100 back is irrelevant. Whether he came back and paid with a card or a different 100 dollar bill is irrelevant. The new transaction is irrelevant. The drawer is short $100 dollars because it was taken.
Praise the Helix Fossil
*6'4" Master Race Crew*
BPL: Liverpool
NHL: Flyers
IG: _markatron
Follow and I'll follow back
12-06-2016, 09:24 AM
-
#190
- MrDeafMuscle
- Token Deaf Guy
-
- MrDeafMuscle
- Token Deaf Guy
- Join Date: May 2011
- Location: Florida, United States
- Posts: 7,232
- Rep Power: 12459
-
-
Originally Posted By mrmk5110⏩
If that was your till, you would be fired and accused of stealing $100 at the end of the day. Go back and look at my post regarding how the till works.Alright then you explain it to me.
12-06-2016, 09:24 AM
-
#191
- MuckSnapper
- Bearded Princess
-
- MuckSnapper
- Bearded Princess
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Posts: 17,959
- Rep Power: 46739
-
-
Originally Posted By mrmk5110⏩
Because a 100 dollar bill is not unique lmao. It just holds a value of 100 dollars.How is putting 100 back into the register not relevant???
Him coming back in with an ENTIRELY DIFFERENTLY 100 DOLLAR BILL would still = the store owner losing $100.
There is no thing without nothing.
_____________________________________
MCC TAutist dicord: https://discord.gg/nX2fBRu
12-06-2016, 09:25 AM
-
#192
Originally Posted By mrmk5110⏩
100 dollars and $30 + 70$ worth of goods is the same thing (ignoring excessive information) in value.Alright then you explain it to me.
He exchanged the 100 he took for something of equivalent value. So he's still up 100 in value either way and the shopkeeper is still down the initial 100.
Or (what I fudged up the first time).
100 (initial money) + 70 (goods) = 170 dollars in the till (what he would have he wasn't stolen from).
100 (initial money) - 100 (money stolen) + 100 (money used to pay for the goods) - 30 dollars (change given back) = 70 dollars (money in the till).
170-70 =100 dollars.
Either way all you need to actually know is that 100 dollars was taken (100 dollars lost).
AP4 Crew.
12-06-2016, 09:26 AM
-
#193
- Bothang
- OG Misc Don
-
- Bothang
- OG Misc Don
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: Texas, New York, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 5,918
- Rep Power: 5181
-
-
Originally Posted By mrmk5110⏩
Say your local store got robbed and they took $7000 dollars from the till. If YOU go in the next day and buy $7000 worth of stuff, does it negate the fact they got robbed $7000 the day before?So what? He used the same 100 to buy the good, and when he gives it to the shop owner the shop owner puts it back into the register. At that point the shop owner is even. The shop owner starts to lose the money when he gives the good to the robber (whatever the cogs was) plus the change.
12-06-2016, 09:26 AM
-
#194
- p100
- Banned
-
- p100
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: Texas, United States
- Posts: 7,379
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
The money is removed from the owner.
The money is given back to the owner.
Shoes worth $70 plus $30 in change is taken instead.
It is simply switching a $100 bill for $70 shoes + $30 cash.
I say the owner is out $100.
The money is given back to the owner.
Shoes worth $70 plus $30 in change is taken instead.
It is simply switching a $100 bill for $70 shoes + $30 cash.
I say the owner is out $100.
12-06-2016, 09:27 AM
-
#195
- mrmk5110
- Chillflix and Net
-
- mrmk5110
- Chillflix and Net
- Join Date: Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,384
- Rep Power: 4008
-
-
Originally Posted By MuckSnapper⏩
Must be trolling, no other explanation. So what if it's a different 100 bill, 100 is 100.Because a 100 dollar bill is not unique lmao. It just holds a value of 100 dollars.
Him coming back in with an ENTIRELY DIFFERENTLY 100 DOLLAR BILL would still = the store owner losing $100.
Him coming back in with an ENTIRELY DIFFERENTLY 100 DOLLAR BILL would still = the store owner losing $100.
Praise the Helix Fossil
*6'4" Master Race Crew*
BPL: Liverpool
NHL: Flyers
IG: _markatron
Follow and I'll follow back
12-06-2016, 09:27 AM
-
#196
12-06-2016, 09:29 AM
-
#197
- MuckSnapper
- Bearded Princess
-
- MuckSnapper
- Bearded Princess
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Posts: 17,959
- Rep Power: 46739
-
-
Originally Posted By mrmk5110⏩
I'm the one who is trolling? lmao.Must be trolling, no other explanation. So what if it's a different 100 bill, 100 is 100.
Dude it's ok I was wrong at first too. It'll dawn on you eventually.
There is no thing without nothing.
_____________________________________
MCC TAutist dicord: https://discord.gg/nX2fBRu
12-06-2016, 09:29 AM
-
#198
- Bothang
- OG Misc Don
-
- Bothang
- OG Misc Don
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: Texas, New York, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 5,918
- Rep Power: 5181
-
-
Originally Posted By p100⏩
exactly. If the robber returns later and uses the money he stole to buy something, its a different $100 (even though its physically the same bill)The money is removed from the owner.
The money is given back to the owner.
Shoes worth $70 plus $30 in change is taken instead.
It is simply switching a $100 bill for $70 shoes + $30 cash.
I say the owner is out $100.
No.It is a different $7,000
The money is given back to the owner.
Shoes worth $70 plus $30 in change is taken instead.
It is simply switching a $100 bill for $70 shoes + $30 cash.
I say the owner is out $100.
No.It is a different $7,000
12-06-2016, 09:31 AM
-
#199
12-06-2016, 09:32 AM
-
#200
12-06-2016, 09:32 AM
-
#201
- meenman83
- Registered User
-
- meenman83
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2007
- Posts: 7,638
- Rep Power: 54289
-
-
Originally Posted By donblaximus⏩
Man you have no idea...When I first opened the thread and read it I thought, there is no way a lot of people get this wrong. Then I starting reading the thread.............
Man, what an eye opener. This is why there is a ton of opportunity in this world.
Man, what an eye opener. This is why there is a ton of opportunity in this world.
★cVc★ Waterboarding - Baptizing terrorists with Freedom since 02'
12-06-2016, 09:35 AM
-
#202
12-06-2016, 09:35 AM
-
#203
12-06-2016, 09:39 AM
-
#204
- SuperHercules
- Join Date: Jun 2014
- Height: 6'5"
- Posts: 32,541
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 571035
-
-
Why are people making this so complicated?
A guy stole $100, no other irregular activities occurred
When he returned to buy things he paid like a regular customer and received the correct amount of change, who cares who the customer was or what bill he used
The owner is down $100 in cash that was stolen from his store, nothing else is relevant
A guy stole $100, no other irregular activities occurred
When he returned to buy things he paid like a regular customer and received the correct amount of change, who cares who the customer was or what bill he used
The owner is down $100 in cash that was stolen from his store, nothing else is relevant
See Shakebrah's sig
12-06-2016, 09:44 AM
-
#205
- seanb1979
- Platinum User
-
- seanb1979
- Platinum User
- Join Date: Dec 2006
- Location: Boise, Idaho, United States
- Posts: 48,650
- Rep Power: 150567
-
-
Need to know more variables like what his overhead costs are, what his markup is, etc.
A million miles away - I don't.. feel.... anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXGZu4yxjW0
12-06-2016, 09:52 AM
-
#206
12-06-2016, 10:19 AM
-
#207
- 300BLK
- Registered User
-
- 300BLK
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2015
- Age: 35
- Posts: 20,309
- Rep Power: 12702
-
-
Originally Posted By Dan916⏩
You know why this riddle is confusing? Because there's no fuking comma between, "He comes back 5 minutes later and buys $70 worth of goods with the $100 bill the owner gives him $30 in change,"
It looks like there should be a comma here (in bold), "He comes back 5 minutes later and buys $70 worth of goods with the $100 bill,the owner gives him $30 in change,"
Or at least a period should be there to make it clear it is a separate exchange. If you separate the sentence there, then you're saying the owner loses $100, because the thief bought $70 worth with the $100 bill he stole, and then the owner gives him $30. Otherwise there are multiple ways to interpret that sentence because it is not correctly structured.
***Black Crew***
No Face Crew
12-06-2016, 10:22 AM
-
#208
130. -100, +0 (+70 in cash -70 in goods), -30
16 y/o
155lbs
5'9"
Puts crew after everything crew
Current Lifts -> Goals by July 1st 2018
Deadlift: 340x5 -> 500x1
Squat: 225x5 -> 365x5
Paused Bench: 135x5 -> 275x5
Ohp: 110x5 -> 185x5
Pullup: 55x5 + 155 lb bw -> 100x5 + 180 lb bw
12-06-2016, 10:27 AM
-
#209
- Shortfuze
- "Your one f*ck fantasy"
-
- Shortfuze
- "Your one f*ck fantasy"
- Join Date: Feb 2004
- Location: United States
- Posts: 31,897
- Rep Power: 179945
-
-
Was the shop owner white or non-white? Because race does matter when it comes the meaning of "loss" and "gain".
notsrs....but I would not be surprised if some college students make this point.
notsrs....but I would not be surprised if some college students make this point.
*Simplicity is the key to life*
Thanks ZBlacktt for the mod rep!
Thanks ForumSentinel for the admin rep!
Thanks Gxp23 for the mod rep!
Thanks 400LB Gorilla for the mod rep!
Thanks CountryMike for admin rep!
Thanks Nics1246 for mod rep!
I got married on August 24, 2013!!
ლ(╹◡╹ლ)
12-06-2016, 10:29 AM
-
#210
- StiffSproles
- #Pray4G(.)(.)
-
- StiffSproles
- #Pray4G(.)(.)
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Posts: 12,438
- Rep Power: 22944
-
-
store owner lost everything (i.e. the entire $100).
*United States Space Force Vet*
"I have embraced my Autism. I am a proud Autist. I believe it endows me with special powers that are incomprehensible to pathetic normies like you. I would gladly sacrifice any chance at a normal life to benefit from the GIFT that is AUTISM."-Drips617
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts