Forum
»
If you don't believe in climate change, please step into this thread and explain why.
12-21-2016, 08:25 AM
-
#1
- Yero91
- Redraiders Whiteknight<3
-
- Yero91
- Redraiders Whiteknight<3
- Join Date: Feb 2012
- Posts: 11,169
- Rep Power: 15873
-
-
If you don't believe in climate change, please step into this thread and explain why.
I'm really trying to keep an open mind here.
*Trading and investing crew*
*Snizzle77 crew*
*sniff hard as fukc when i see Redraider86 post so i can smell her perfume, crew*
*Redraider86 crew*
*Heart skips a beat when I see Redraider86 post crew*
*shrine dedicated to Redraider86 crew*
*saving myself for Redraider86 crew*
12-21-2016, 08:28 AM
-
#2
- All-Star11
- Registered User
-
- All-Star11
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2004
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Posts: 7,415
- Rep Power: 65601
-
-
first it was global warming...
oops it's actually colder this year than last
now it's climate change...
broad way of saying things arent the same. "look at this graph I made. 10,000 years ago the average temperature was this and now its this. you wot mate??" we had brah's 10,000 years ago taking accurate temperatures?
yah ok brah...
Here. take my carbon tax. tax that by another 13% and go fix climate change. fukking Trudeau and his liberal douche army
oops it's actually colder this year than last
now it's climate change...
broad way of saying things arent the same. "look at this graph I made. 10,000 years ago the average temperature was this and now its this. you wot mate??" we had brah's 10,000 years ago taking accurate temperatures?
yah ok brah...
Here. take my carbon tax. tax that by another 13% and go fix climate change. fukking Trudeau and his liberal douche army
12-21-2016, 08:28 AM
-
#3
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,852
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 260932
-
-
Who cares? Climates have shifted before. It's a completely natural phenomenon that occurred long before humans came about on this planet.
Why do you doomsday climate change supporters completely ignore this fact. You really stupid enough to think WE are causing climate change?
Some of you think you're more important/influential than you are
Why do you doomsday climate change supporters completely ignore this fact. You really stupid enough to think WE are causing climate change?
Some of you think you're more important/influential than you are
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
12-21-2016, 08:31 AM
-
#4
- Benjinkan
- #JohnnyLargemeat
-
- Benjinkan
- #JohnnyLargemeat
- Join Date: Apr 2015
- Location: Wales, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 6,695
- Rep Power: 20372
-
-
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1⏩
This, its a cyclical event that happens regardless of human impact... who was multiple ice ages? Should we look after the environment? Absolutely. Do havethatlevel of impact on it? Nopes.Who cares? Climates have shifted before. It's a completely natural phenomenon that occurred long before humans came about on this planet.
Currently running: Viking bare bones (L/P/P/L/U)
*** Dawn Patrol Crew ***
*AP7 crew*
*Rugby crew*
Building bridges just to watch them burn
12-21-2016, 08:31 AM
-
#5
- ironicinori
- bannable
-
- ironicinori
- bannable
- Join Date: Sep 2013
- Posts: 7,259
- Rep Power: 20058
-
-
Climate change is happening. It's not immediately clear that humans are the cause. It's a fukkin natural cycle and has been for millions of years.
Of course, humans are causing lots of other problems, like crippling smog and polluted oceans. So I personally think whining about man made climate change takes focus away from things we can actually control.
Of course, humans are causing lots of other problems, like crippling smog and polluted oceans. So I personally think whining about man made climate change takes focus away from things we can actually control.
Broke both legs and ankles crew.
Recover gains or die trying crew.
12-21-2016, 08:34 AM
-
#6
- All-Star11
- Registered User
-
- All-Star11
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2004
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Posts: 7,415
- Rep Power: 65601
-
-
Originally Posted By All-Star11⏩
this guy knows what he's talking about!first it was global warming...
oops it's actually colder this year than last
now it's climate change...
broad way of saying things arent the same. "look at this graph I made. 10,000 years ago the average temperature was this and now its this. you wot mate??" we had brah's 10,000 years ago taking accurate temperatures?
yah ok brah...
Here. take my carbon tax. tax that by another 13% and go fix climate change. fukking Trudeau and his liberal douche army
oops it's actually colder this year than last
now it's climate change...
broad way of saying things arent the same. "look at this graph I made. 10,000 years ago the average temperature was this and now its this. you wot mate??" we had brah's 10,000 years ago taking accurate temperatures?
yah ok brah...
Here. take my carbon tax. tax that by another 13% and go fix climate change. fukking Trudeau and his liberal douche army
12-21-2016, 08:34 AM
-
#7
Originally Posted By All-Star11⏩
thisfirst it was global warming...
oops it's actually colder this year than last
now it's climate change...
broad way of saying things arent the same. "look at this graph I made. 10,000 years ago the average temperature was this and now its this. you wot mate??" we had brah's 10,000 years ago taking accurate temperatures?
yah ok brah...
Here. take my carbon tax. tax that by another 13% and go fix climate change. fukking Trudeau and his liberal douche army
oops it's actually colder this year than last
now it's climate change...
broad way of saying things arent the same. "look at this graph I made. 10,000 years ago the average temperature was this and now its this. you wot mate??" we had brah's 10,000 years ago taking accurate temperatures?
yah ok brah...
Here. take my carbon tax. tax that by another 13% and go fix climate change. fukking Trudeau and his liberal douche army
Support feminists. Hairy women need love too.
1000 days of nofap success crew
12-21-2016, 08:36 AM
-
#8
12-21-2016, 08:37 AM
-
#9
12-21-2016, 08:37 AM
-
#10
12-21-2016, 08:37 AM
-
#11
- ironicinori
- bannable
-
- ironicinori
- bannable
- Join Date: Sep 2013
- Posts: 7,259
- Rep Power: 20058
-
-
Originally Posted By All-Star11⏩
They definitely can tell what the temps were in past ages by the ice layers, chemical composition of rocks, etc.first it was global warming...
oops it's actually colder this year than last
now it's climate change...
broad way of saying things arent the same. "look at this graph I made. 10,000 years ago the average temperature was this and now its this. you wot mate??" we had brah's 10,000 years ago taking accurate temperatures?
yah ok brah...
Here. take my carbon tax. tax that by another 13% and go fix climate change. fukking Trudeau and his liberal douche army
oops it's actually colder this year than last
now it's climate change...
broad way of saying things arent the same. "look at this graph I made. 10,000 years ago the average temperature was this and now its this. you wot mate??" we had brah's 10,000 years ago taking accurate temperatures?
yah ok brah...
Here. take my carbon tax. tax that by another 13% and go fix climate change. fukking Trudeau and his liberal douche army
But that makes it even more stupid to think that the 100 years of human industry is causing climate change, when the same chit was happening naturally 10,000 years ago.
Broke both legs and ankles crew.
Recover gains or die trying crew.
12-21-2016, 08:37 AM
-
#12
- DolphLungin
- Registered User
-
- DolphLungin
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2014
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 45
- Posts: 156
- Rep Power: 561
-
-
It's not that people don't think the earth's climate can change over long spans of time. We know of things such as ice ages, and the earth's natural cooling and warming cycles. The term "climate change denier" has very misleading meanings. Everyone can also agree that we would like a cleaner planet but the taxes, regulations, and economic destruction through totalitarian regulations that are being forced upon us in the name of climate change are BS.
Lost 5 pounds, BRB throwing away all jeans and buying new ones crew
Eat the same chicken part as the body part you are training that day crew
Only hit straight at the driving range crew
12-21-2016, 08:43 AM
-
#13
- Forty0zFreedom
- Banned
-
- Forty0zFreedom
- Banned
- Join Date: May 2010
- Age: 44
- Posts: 6,987
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
It doesn't work that way. Burden of proof is on you.
12-21-2016, 08:44 AM
-
#14
- winjones
- Registered User
-
- winjones
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2009
- Location: New York, United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 5,320
- Rep Power: 10515
-
-
Originally Posted By Benjinkan⏩
Rapid warming due to natural causes ended around 10,000 years ago.This, its a cyclical event that happens regardless of human impact... who was multiple ice ages? Should we look after the environment? Absolutely. Do havethatlevel of impact on it? Nopes.

Specifically look at the rapid change over the past 1000 years... where else in history does this happen? Explain the breaking of this tread around the time of the Industrial Revolution?
Please find another model that refutes this or something that disproves it... you can use any part of Earth's history. I'm open to a debate.
12-21-2016, 08:46 AM
-
#15
- neuron
- Veritas. Aequitas.
-
- neuron
- Veritas. Aequitas.
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Location: County Donegal, Ireland
- Posts: 8,417
- Rep Power: 51207
-
-
Originally Posted By winjones⏩
That graph is bull****Rapid warming due to natural causes ended around 10,000 years ago.

Specifically look at the rapid change over the past 1000 years... where else in history does this happen? Explain the breaking of this tread around the time of the Industrial Revolution?
Please find another model that refutes this or something that disproves it... you can use any part of Earth's history. I'm open to a debate.

Specifically look at the rapid change over the past 1000 years... where else in history does this happen? Explain the breaking of this tread around the time of the Industrial Revolution?
Please find another model that refutes this or something that disproves it... you can use any part of Earth's history. I'm open to a debate.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0
twitter: @bullexinferis
12-21-2016, 08:49 AM
-
#16
- neuron
- Veritas. Aequitas.
-
- neuron
- Veritas. Aequitas.
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Location: County Donegal, Ireland
- Posts: 8,417
- Rep Power: 51207
-
-
Ive been in academia for the last ~12 years. Good luck publishing anything that goes against the leftists consensus (of any issue and iteration). Your funding will dry up and you will lose your job (it also wont be published). This is how the consensus persists. Its a ****ing echo chamber.
twitter: @bullexinferis
12-21-2016, 08:50 AM
-
#17
- nzgs
- who is john galt?
-
- nzgs
- who is john galt?
- Join Date: Nov 2008
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 14,238
- Rep Power: 17400
-
-
I don't accept anthropogenic climate change, because the evidence for it is so weak, has been fiddled so extensively, and because more evidence exists that disproves the models than confirm them.
-A strong scientific theory does not need its raw data to be fiddled by NASA to fit an agenda. NASA systematically fiddled historical data to show a warming trend where there is none on the raw data.http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...ievable-scale/
-A strong scientific theory makes solid predictions that are testable. Climate change scientists use computer models to predict future temperature rises, which have proven incorrect until now because they are based on incorrect mathematics that grossly exaggerate trends. This video explains the flaw in the math behind all climate change models, and there is a paper close to publication on the matter.
-A strong scientific theory does not need political activists to silence criticism and shame people into acceptance, in lieu of actual evidence.
-The best evidence, from raw satellite data not flawed models, suggests that solar activity drives changes to the climate whether it's warming or cooling. This is politically inconvenient because socialists can't tax the sun. Here are 100 published papers that come to this conclusion, and which have been ignored by the mainstream media.
http://notrickszone.com/100-papers-s....W1rVh3QY.dpbs
-A strong scientific theory does not need its raw data to be fiddled by NASA to fit an agenda. NASA systematically fiddled historical data to show a warming trend where there is none on the raw data.http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...ievable-scale/
-A strong scientific theory makes solid predictions that are testable. Climate change scientists use computer models to predict future temperature rises, which have proven incorrect until now because they are based on incorrect mathematics that grossly exaggerate trends. This video explains the flaw in the math behind all climate change models, and there is a paper close to publication on the matter.
-A strong scientific theory does not need political activists to silence criticism and shame people into acceptance, in lieu of actual evidence.
-The best evidence, from raw satellite data not flawed models, suggests that solar activity drives changes to the climate whether it's warming or cooling. This is politically inconvenient because socialists can't tax the sun. Here are 100 published papers that come to this conclusion, and which have been ignored by the mainstream media.
http://notrickszone.com/100-papers-s....W1rVh3QY.dpbs
12-21-2016, 08:50 AM
-
#18
- Benjinkan
- #JohnnyLargemeat
-
- Benjinkan
- #JohnnyLargemeat
- Join Date: Apr 2015
- Location: Wales, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 6,695
- Rep Power: 20372
-
-
Originally Posted By winjones⏩
Personally I would question the statistical significance of best guess 'reconstructed' temperature data that shows a difference of ~0.2C between present and the Medieval warm period... and who is to say a cycle isn't much longer than 2000 years? I'd still say it's not anywhere near conclusive proof that the current change is due to human influence.Please find another model that refutes this or something that disproves it... you can use any part of Earth's history. I'm open to a debate.
Currently running: Viking bare bones (L/P/P/L/U)
*** Dawn Patrol Crew ***
*AP7 crew*
*Rugby crew*
Building bridges just to watch them burn
12-21-2016, 08:50 AM
-
#19
- drFEEL
- registered fuk ass
-
- drFEEL
- registered fuk ass
- Join Date: Jun 2013
- Posts: 7,990
- Rep Power: 7476
-
-
Even if humans are causing it, doesnt fuken matter. One thing libcucks dont realize is that the market is moving towards renewable energy like solar and wind. This will literally eliminate the greatest sources of extra co2
So its not really an issue. Go find something else to feel self righteous about
So its not really an issue. Go find something else to feel self righteous about
-even lifts
-gonna make it or die trying crew
-no fat chicks crew
-#1 career thread creator
12-21-2016, 08:51 AM
-
#20
- jamesbwbevis
- Banned
-
- jamesbwbevis
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 36
- Posts: 18,281
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
I believe in it, I just dont care because the consequences won't impact me
12-21-2016, 08:54 AM
-
#21
- nzgs
- who is john galt?
-
- nzgs
- who is john galt?
- Join Date: Nov 2008
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 14,238
- Rep Power: 17400
-
-
Originally Posted By winjones⏩
Before accepting things blindly, you should question the methodology of "reconstructed" temperature and of "temperature anomaly". This is not raw data.Rapid warming due to natural causes ended around 10,000 years ago.

Specifically look at the rapid change over the past 1000 years... where else in history does this happen? Explain the breaking of this tread around the time of the Industrial Revolution?
Please find another model that refutes this or something that disproves it... you can use any part of Earth's history. I'm open to a debate.

Specifically look at the rapid change over the past 1000 years... where else in history does this happen? Explain the breaking of this tread around the time of the Industrial Revolution?
Please find another model that refutes this or something that disproves it... you can use any part of Earth's history. I'm open to a debate.
12-21-2016, 08:59 AM
-
#22
- neuron
- Veritas. Aequitas.
-
- neuron
- Veritas. Aequitas.
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Location: County Donegal, Ireland
- Posts: 8,417
- Rep Power: 51207
-
-
Originally Posted By nzgs⏩
In my world, any intervention study methodology has to be officially published prior to the study being undertaken. This is to prevent moving goal posts (and post hoc manipulation) based on the data results. The climate change community has no such mechanisms. They manipulate the data ad libitum.Before accepting things blindly, you should question the methodology of "reconstructed" temperature and of "temperature anomaly". This is not raw data.
twitter: @bullexinferis
12-21-2016, 09:00 AM
-
#23
- jamesbwbevis
- Banned
-
- jamesbwbevis
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 36
- Posts: 18,281
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
global warming is real and we are definitely significantly contributing to it, the only people trying to deny it are those that stand to lose like oil companies.
herp derp
herp derp
12-21-2016, 09:13 AM
-
#24
- Tornach
- OG @ Castle Grayskull
-
- Tornach
- OG @ Castle Grayskull
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 16,159
- Rep Power: 51309
-
-
Its a conspiracy made by a certain group of people to make us afraid. 100% srs
Rustling NPCs' jimmies without even trying crew
"I've watched a lot of movies, I know what I'm doing."
"The Best Revenge is Massive Success"
Not going to be a Darkseeker crew.
RIP Duckenheimer
RIP SemperFudge
12-21-2016, 09:21 AM
-
#25
If you pee in the ocean, lib scientist could say "humans are polluting the ocean"
but the question is to what degree did that bit of pee do anything?
Technically the scientific statement is true.
But they don't tell you to what meaningless degree the degrees change.
Thats how they getcha!!!
but the question is to what degree did that bit of pee do anything?
Technically the scientific statement is true.
But they don't tell you to what meaningless degree the degrees change.
Thats how they getcha!!!
12-21-2016, 09:24 AM
-
#26
- annasmith7
- Banned
-
- annasmith7
- Banned
- Join Date: Dec 2016
- Age: 39
- Posts: 119
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
I never, EVER, believed in global warming, I always knew it was a total scam
12-21-2016, 09:27 AM
-
#27
Originally Posted By Tornach⏩
Its a conspiracy made by a certain group of people to make us afraid. 100% srs
Originally Posted By annasmith7⏩
^These are the same types of cucks who think dinosaurs never walked the earth. Yeah science is all a conspiracy you cuck, fossils are the work of the devil you apocalyptic ****s.I never, EVER, believed in global warming, I always knew it was a total scam
12-21-2016, 09:29 AM
-
#28
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
-
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
- Posts: 34,072
- Rep Power: 206818
-
-
Because politicized science is almost always bull****. It isn't science that I don't believe, it's the scientists performing it.
Nobody says "Climate change doesn't exist", what people say is "The climate has always been in a state of change, and it's the height of human hubris to assume we're having any kind of effect on it."
Also, the sale of carbon credits comes to mind.
Nobody says "Climate change doesn't exist", what people say is "The climate has always been in a state of change, and it's the height of human hubris to assume we're having any kind of effect on it."
Also, the sale of carbon credits comes to mind.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."
-Hercules
Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
12-21-2016, 09:34 AM
-
#29
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
Name you listen to me, you colossal waste of oxygen. Do you think these are the same type of beta cucks who promulgate false rape statistics like "1 in 4 women on college campuses have been raped"? YEAH, TO OBTAIN MORE FUNDING FROM THE GOVERNMENT FOR THEIR AGENDA. JUST LIKE CLIMATE CHANGE SCIENTISTS. You should name your penor "colossus, destroyer of dreams and souls".Because politicized science is almost always bull****. It isn't science that I don't believe, it's the scientists performing it.
Nobody says "Climate change doesn't exist", what people say is "The climate has always been in a state of change, and it's the height of human hubris to assume we're having any kind of effect on it."
Also, the sale of carbon credits comes to mind.
Nobody says "Climate change doesn't exist", what people say is "The climate has always been in a state of change, and it's the height of human hubris to assume we're having any kind of effect on it."
Also, the sale of carbon credits comes to mind.
12-21-2016, 09:34 AM
-
#30
- BrocepCurls
- Banned
-
- BrocepCurls
- Banned
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Posts: 15,180
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Why must political Conservatism and scientific ignorance go hand-in-hand, almost always?
Whether you lean right or left politically should not be an indicator of howlittle science you are able to comprehend.Why is this trend so prevalent in our society then?
Whether you lean right or left politically should not be an indicator of howlittle science you are able to comprehend.Why is this trend so prevalent in our society then?
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts