Forum
»
Toddler ends up with 50 stitches after dog of peace ravages it's poor face
02-11-2017, 07:24 AM
-
#31
02-11-2017, 07:48 PM
-
#32
- BloodyBaron
- Registered User
-
- BloodyBaron
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2015
- Location: Canada
- Age: 31
- Posts: 5,173
- Rep Power: 6999
-
-
Originally Posted By shreddertroll⏩
Rage.I've noticed some propaganda dog ******** pages where they have a bunch of pitbulls and various dog breeds sleeping near children, it's fcking sick. Risking your childs life to enforce some pro-dog bull****.
Originally Posted By stfudonny⏩
100% dead srs u mad?legit cant tell if youre trolling
[New York Giants] | [Anaheim Angels] | [Los Angeles Lakers]
**We don't negotiate with feminists Crew**
**Patrice O'Neal/Black Phillip Show Crew (RIP)**
**Kevin Samuels Crew (RIP)**
**Kanye West has 6 classic albums AND named the TRIBE therefore he is GOATED Crew**
02-11-2017, 07:53 PM
-
#33
02-11-2017, 08:06 PM
-
#34
- CptClean
- Registered Hustler
-
- CptClean
- Registered Hustler
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 5,300
- Rep Power: 18485
-
-
Originally Posted By ToPHeR35⏩
Statistics actually say that 90% of all dog attack related fatalities in the USA are done by pitbulls...**** off op
Statistics prove you wrong as usual. My pits are as sweet as any other breed. Why? Because I'm a responsible owner. Shocker..
Statistics prove you wrong as usual. My pits are as sweet as any other breed. Why? Because I'm a responsible owner. Shocker..
So if it's just bad owners do bad dog owners ONLY choose to buy pitbulls? Because if a bad owner made dogs vicious wouldn't all the labs, huskys etc. with bad owners be attacking people as well?
One day scientists are going to kill us all.
02-11-2017, 08:09 PM
-
#35
- FitnessBlue
- RH bro specialist
-
- FitnessBlue
- RH bro specialist
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Location: BC, Canada
- Age: 47
- Posts: 15,948
- Rep Power: 93464
-
-
I would gladly Mortal Kombat Sub Zero the fuk outta a pitbull if it came anywhere near my kids or if I was witness of an attack on anyone.
Fatality boyo!
Fatality boyo!
*LEO crew*
*Alpha crew*
*Conservative crew*
*No Ma'am crew*
*Electric Guitar crew*
**always listen to your gut instinct**
~if you want prince charming, you better be a princess~
02-11-2017, 08:09 PM
-
#36
- velvetmudhole
- Join Date: 1969
-
- velvetmudhole
- Join Date: 1969
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Posts: 21,451
- Rep Power: 38555
-
-
Came in to see if it was a pitbull
Confirmed
Leaving
Confirmed
Leaving
I fap to your avi
I cry during sad movies crew
I love my family crew
STL crew
Sniffs screwdriver handles crew
02-11-2017, 08:09 PM
-
#37
- Dysfunqtional
- Registered User
-
- Dysfunqtional
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: Chad
- Posts: 19,070
- Rep Power: 15332
-
-
Originally Posted By dj924s⏩
the fact that any mouth breathing motherfuker ever needs to utter those words just goes to show you the dog should not be anywhere near any human being whatsoever."The owners of “Camo,” the pit bull involved, say there were not home when the attack happened but that those with the dog were told not to let the dog near any children."
"those with the dog were told not to let the dog near any children."
If you missed it.
"those with the dog were told not to let the dog near any children."
"those with the dog were told not to let the dog near any children."
If you missed it.
"those with the dog were told not to let the dog near any children."
02-11-2017, 08:09 PM
-
#38
- BloodyBaron
- Registered User
-
- BloodyBaron
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2015
- Location: Canada
- Age: 31
- Posts: 5,173
- Rep Power: 6999
-
-
Originally Posted By ToPHeR35⏩
lololololololol**** off op
Statistics prove you wrong as usual. My pits are as sweet as any other breed. Why? Because I'm a responsible owner. Shocker..
Statistics prove you wrong as usual. My pits are as sweet as any other breed. Why? Because I'm a responsible owner. Shocker..
just..lolololol
LMAO
next level cope by a murder dog owner
[New York Giants] | [Anaheim Angels] | [Los Angeles Lakers]
**We don't negotiate with feminists Crew**
**Patrice O'Neal/Black Phillip Show Crew (RIP)**
**Kevin Samuels Crew (RIP)**
**Kanye West has 6 classic albums AND named the TRIBE therefore he is GOATED Crew**
02-11-2017, 08:15 PM
-
#39
This is not a dog issue, it is a parenting issue. Focus on the parents, who are always responsible for the health and welfare of their child. I seriously hope Child Welfare is all over this.
◄FILMM∆KER CRW►
◄PHOTOGRAPHY CRW►
**Official Bicycle Crew** Ờờ
**Official No Cell Phone Zombie Crew**
Muscle Memory is Real!
Old Man Strength is Real!
It's been a long time coming but I know A Change Is Gonna Come
02-11-2017, 08:26 PM
-
#40
- BloodyBaron
- Registered User
-
- BloodyBaron
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2015
- Location: Canada
- Age: 31
- Posts: 5,173
- Rep Power: 6999
-
-
Originally Posted By shreddertroll⏩
dog of peace owners are all sociopaths so this isn't surprising. they get off on telling everybody that their dogs are gud boyz who dindu nuffin and wouldn't hurt a fly (like the cuck above). even though they've only had the dog for a few years, and have no idea of the sick capabilities of their dogs.I've noticed some propaganda dog ******** pages where they have a bunch of pitbulls and various dog breeds sleeping near children, it's fcking sick. Risking your childs life to enforce some pro-dog bull****.
[New York Giants] | [Anaheim Angels] | [Los Angeles Lakers]
**We don't negotiate with feminists Crew**
**Patrice O'Neal/Black Phillip Show Crew (RIP)**
**Kevin Samuels Crew (RIP)**
**Kanye West has 6 classic albums AND named the TRIBE therefore he is GOATED Crew**
02-11-2017, 08:27 PM
-
#41
- YeaRightBuddy
- Registered User
-
- YeaRightBuddy
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Age: 32
- Posts: 1,660
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By dj924s⏩
Logic not even once.....Full disclosure I own two rottweilers one is not only fully capable of attacking she is specifically trained to do so (schutzhund).
With the "logic" of banning animals capable of harming humans, you would also be inclined to ban people from living in a climate where the temp can get below 32 degrees f because 15 people a year are killed by icicles, and only 10 a year by dogs. While we are at it we're going to need to do away with anything poisonous, flamable, higher than 18", deeper than 1/4", and harder than nerf.
......And even after all of this a negligent parent will still find a way to blame something for their own irresponsibility.
or
Maybe we can hold people accountable for their own actions, or in-actions.
With the "logic" of banning animals capable of harming humans, you would also be inclined to ban people from living in a climate where the temp can get below 32 degrees f because 15 people a year are killed by icicles, and only 10 a year by dogs. While we are at it we're going to need to do away with anything poisonous, flamable, higher than 18", deeper than 1/4", and harder than nerf.
......And even after all of this a negligent parent will still find a way to blame something for their own irresponsibility.
or
Maybe we can hold people accountable for their own actions, or in-actions.
There's a huge difference between self inflicted accident and accidents that involve someone other than yourself. Next you'll say they should ban sugar too.
Guns aren't killing DEFENSELESS toddlers by themselves. Guns need a person pulling the trigger.
This is absolutely not a gun debate. As a pro gun supporter I'm ashamed you can't see the difference.
If a stray pitbull has offspring and his offspring kill your kid at the park. Who do you blame then? Exact same reason many other types of animals are banned or contained to a region.
02-11-2017, 08:53 PM
-
#42
- leoslayer1
- Registered User
-
- leoslayer1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: United States
- Age: 56
- Posts: 27,840
- Rep Power: 194666
-
-
Happened to my son when he was three.
Main wound was 10 inches long. Skull exposed. 38 other lacerations. Detached left eyebrow. Orbitals punctured at four places two bald spots. Eyes swollen shut for two weeks.
He had 8 hours of emergency plastic surgery.
Main wound was 10 inches long. Skull exposed. 38 other lacerations. Detached left eyebrow. Orbitals punctured at four places two bald spots. Eyes swollen shut for two weeks.
He had 8 hours of emergency plastic surgery.
U
02-11-2017, 08:54 PM
-
#43
- NotoriousSRJ
- meat for the machine
-
- NotoriousSRJ
- meat for the machine
- Join Date: Apr 2012
- Posts: 6,162
- Rep Power: 18455
-
-
#notallpitbulls
don't take this seriously
02-11-2017, 08:59 PM
-
#44
- BloodyBaron
- Registered User
-
- BloodyBaron
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2015
- Location: Canada
- Age: 31
- Posts: 5,173
- Rep Power: 6999
-
-
Originally Posted By leoslayer1⏩
RAGE.Happened to my son when he was three.
Main wound was 10 inches long. Skull exposed. 38 other lacerations. Detached left eyebrow. Orbitals punctured at four places two bald spots. Eyes swollen shut for two weeks.
He had 8 hours of emergency plastic surgery.
Main wound was 10 inches long. Skull exposed. 38 other lacerations. Detached left eyebrow. Orbitals punctured at four places two bald spots. Eyes swollen shut for two weeks.
He had 8 hours of emergency plastic surgery.
Was it your own pitbull? Or somebody elses? How did your child get near such a disgusting creature?
Holy fuk..I'm so sorry man.
[New York Giants] | [Anaheim Angels] | [Los Angeles Lakers]
**We don't negotiate with feminists Crew**
**Patrice O'Neal/Black Phillip Show Crew (RIP)**
**Kevin Samuels Crew (RIP)**
**Kanye West has 6 classic albums AND named the TRIBE therefore he is GOATED Crew**
02-11-2017, 09:05 PM
-
#45
- blckndyllw
- Registered User
-
- blckndyllw
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2013
- Age: 32
- Posts: 14,884
- Rep Power: 18414
-
-
Probably one of the people who do things like this
and argue against people that its always the owners fault when pit bulls inevitably attack
and argue against people that its always the owners fault when pit bulls inevitably attack
Jekyll Jekyll Hyde, Jekyll Hyde, Hyde, Jekyll!
02-11-2017, 09:05 PM
-
#46
- liftasaurus
- Banned
-
- liftasaurus
- Banned
- Join Date: Nov 2013
- Age: 37
- Posts: 4,489
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
they are banned in so many places and idiots still cannot figure out why. they weren't banned for no reason you ****ing spastics.
02-11-2017, 09:16 PM
-
#47
- ToPHeR35
- Civil Tradie
-
- ToPHeR35
- Civil Tradie
- Join Date: Mar 2008
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Posts: 16,772
- Rep Power: 38522
-
-
Originally Posted By CptClean⏩
So using your logic bad dog owners also choose Rottweilers. Dog breed stats are irrelevant because of how often breeds are mislabeled. The problem is alot of dogs are labeled as pitbulls even though they're a mix or a type of bulldog. Most people who label pitbulls don't even know what a true one looks like.Statistics actually say that 90% of all dog attack related fatalities in the USA are done by pitbulls...
So if it's just bad owners do bad dog owners ONLY choose to buy pitbulls? Because if a bad owner made dogs vicious wouldn't all the labs, huskys etc. with bad owners be attacking people as well?
So if it's just bad owners do bad dog owners ONLY choose to buy pitbulls? Because if a bad owner made dogs vicious wouldn't all the labs, huskys etc. with bad owners be attacking people as well?
The reason why you hear more about pit bulls attacking on the news than any other breed is that it is sensationalist news. In the past, it has been GSDs, rottweilers, and dobermans that were the "crazy killer dogs that will turn on you in an instant". News companies report on things that get people riled up, as it gets them attention. I think the issue is really at the point where they keep doing it just because there is SO much debate about the inherent violent tendencies of the breed. Give it a few years, it will likely be another breed thrown under the media bus.
This can be further proved by looking at news articles about dog bites- MOST do not include pictures, those that do often do not include pictures of the offending dog (I saw one just last week that was clearly labeled 'stock photo of a pit bull' under the photo). There have been reports of news organizations claiming that dogs like BEAGLES and LABS were pit bulls, just to have a story about it.
The media looks for a martyr, the Pit bull is this generations 'dangerous dog' (which is funny, as, like I said MANY of these dogs are not actually pit bulls, just bully-LIKE dogs, if that). If you want some proof about how pit bulls are not blood thirsty killers by default - look up the breeds history. They used to be known as "America's Dog" and were actually extremely popular choices for families and children. They were used in the military (WW1), in the media (Little rascals) and were commonly referred to as 'The Nanny Dog' for their patience, good temperament and protection of young children. Hell, they even score very high on the temperament test compared to most other breeds.
02-11-2017, 09:23 PM
-
#48
- YeaRightBuddy
- Registered User
-
- YeaRightBuddy
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Age: 32
- Posts: 1,660
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By ToPHeR35⏩
Solid statistics and references boyoSo using your logic bad dog owners also choose Rottweilers. Dog breed stats are irrelevant because of how often breeds are mislabeled. The problem is alot of dogs are labeled as pitbulls even though they're a mix or a type of bulldog. Most people who label pitbulls don't even know what a true one looks like.
The reason why you hear more about pit bulls attacking on the news than any other breed is that it is sensationalist news. In the past, it has been GSDs, rottweilers, and dobermans that were the "crazy killer dogs that will turn on you in an instant". News companies report on things that get people riled up, as it gets them attention. I think the issue is really at the point where they keep doing it just because there is SO much debate about the inherent violent tendencies of the breed. Give it a few years, it will likely be another breed thrown under the media bus.
This can be further proved by looking at news articles about dog bites- MOST do not include pictures, those that do often do not include pictures of the offending dog (I saw one just last week that was clearly labeled 'stock photo of a pit bull' under the photo). There have been reports of news organizations claiming that dogs like BEAGLES and LABS were pit bulls, just to have a story about it.
The media looks for a martyr, the Pit bull is this generations 'dangerous dog' (which is funny, as, like I said MANY of these dogs are not actually pit bulls, just bully-LIKE dogs, if that). If you want some proof about how pit bulls are not blood thirsty killers by default - look up the breeds history. They used to be known as "America's Dog" and were actually extremely popular choices for families and children. They were used in the military (WW1), in the media (Little rascals) and were commonly referred to as 'The Nanny Dog' for their patience, good temperament and protection of young children. Hell, they even score very high on the temperament test compared to most other breeds.
The reason why you hear more about pit bulls attacking on the news than any other breed is that it is sensationalist news. In the past, it has been GSDs, rottweilers, and dobermans that were the "crazy killer dogs that will turn on you in an instant". News companies report on things that get people riled up, as it gets them attention. I think the issue is really at the point where they keep doing it just because there is SO much debate about the inherent violent tendencies of the breed. Give it a few years, it will likely be another breed thrown under the media bus.
This can be further proved by looking at news articles about dog bites- MOST do not include pictures, those that do often do not include pictures of the offending dog (I saw one just last week that was clearly labeled 'stock photo of a pit bull' under the photo). There have been reports of news organizations claiming that dogs like BEAGLES and LABS were pit bulls, just to have a story about it.
The media looks for a martyr, the Pit bull is this generations 'dangerous dog' (which is funny, as, like I said MANY of these dogs are not actually pit bulls, just bully-LIKE dogs, if that). If you want some proof about how pit bulls are not blood thirsty killers by default - look up the breeds history. They used to be known as "America's Dog" and were actually extremely popular choices for families and children. They were used in the military (WW1), in the media (Little rascals) and were commonly referred to as 'The Nanny Dog' for their patience, good temperament and protection of young children. Hell, they even score very high on the temperament test compared to most other breeds.
02-11-2017, 09:24 PM
-
#49
02-11-2017, 09:27 PM
-
#50
- Better Unborn
- ♔ King Rotter ♔
-
- Better Unborn
- ♔ King Rotter ♔
- Join Date: Aug 2003
- Location: United States
- Posts: 26,485
- Rep Power: 181877
-
-
I bet it was one of those ******* ******** couples that wanted to make a cute "look how friendly pitts are" by making the baby cuddle with them
(__Y__) Misc Buck Breaker (__Y__)
( o Y o ) Milk Wagon Engineer ( o Y o )
~@( Official Youthful Glow Connoisseur )@~
02-11-2017, 09:28 PM
-
#51
- gentilhomme
- I'm here to fix the cable
-
- gentilhomme
- I'm here to fix the cable
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: United States
- Posts: 1,562
- Rep Power: 5003
-
-
Originally Posted By dj924s⏩
You'd have a really good point if guns were able to attack people on their own. Owning a gun is nothing like owning a dog."It's in their blood to prey on the weak (specifically children)."
Nope, they were bread to fight BULLS, not children. <--the secret is in the name
Anyway it is indeed just like the gun debate. The person who bares responsibility for pulling a trigger is responsible for their own actions.
The person who put this child together with this dog is responsible for their own actions.
Nope, they were bread to fight BULLS, not children. <--the secret is in the name
Anyway it is indeed just like the gun debate. The person who bares responsibility for pulling a trigger is responsible for their own actions.
The person who put this child together with this dog is responsible for their own actions.
6'3" 185
"Give me chastity and give me constancy, but do not give it yet." -Saint Augustine
*rep Iowans on sight crew*
*We're all gonna make it...anti-LDAR crew*
02-11-2017, 09:33 PM
-
#52
- BloodyBaron
- Registered User
-
- BloodyBaron
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2015
- Location: Canada
- Age: 31
- Posts: 5,173
- Rep Power: 6999
-
-
Originally Posted By ToPHeR35⏩
Absolutely disgusting cope. Negged.So using your logic bad dog owners also choose Rottweilers. Dog breed stats are irrelevant because of how often breeds are mislabeled. The problem is alot of dogs are labeled as pitbulls even though they're a mix or a type of bulldog. Most people who label pitbulls don't even know what a true one looks like.
The reason why you hear more about pit bulls attacking on the news than any other breed is that it is sensationalist news. In the past, it has been GSDs, rottweilers, and dobermans that were the "crazy killer dogs that will turn on you in an instant". News companies report on things that get people riled up, as it gets them attention. I think the issue is really at the point where they keep doing it just because there is SO much debate about the inherent violent tendencies of the breed. Give it a few years, it will likely be another breed thrown under the media bus.
This can be further proved by looking at news articles about dog bites- MOST do not include pictures, those that do often do not include pictures of the offending dog (I saw one just last week that was clearly labeled 'stock photo of a pit bull' under the photo). There have been reports of news organizations claiming that dogs like BEAGLES and LABS were pit bulls, just to have a story about it.
The media looks for a martyr, the Pit bull is this generations 'dangerous dog' (which is funny, as, like I said MANY of these dogs are not actually pit bulls, just bully-LIKE dogs, if that). If you want some proof about how pit bulls are not blood thirsty killers by default - look up the breeds history. They used to be known as "America's Dog" and were actually extremely popular choices for families and children. They were used in the military (WW1), in the media (Little rascals) and were commonly referred to as 'The Nanny Dog' for their patience, good temperament and protection of young children. Hell, they even score very high on the temperament test compared to most other breeds.
The reason why you hear more about pit bulls attacking on the news than any other breed is that it is sensationalist news. In the past, it has been GSDs, rottweilers, and dobermans that were the "crazy killer dogs that will turn on you in an instant". News companies report on things that get people riled up, as it gets them attention. I think the issue is really at the point where they keep doing it just because there is SO much debate about the inherent violent tendencies of the breed. Give it a few years, it will likely be another breed thrown under the media bus.
This can be further proved by looking at news articles about dog bites- MOST do not include pictures, those that do often do not include pictures of the offending dog (I saw one just last week that was clearly labeled 'stock photo of a pit bull' under the photo). There have been reports of news organizations claiming that dogs like BEAGLES and LABS were pit bulls, just to have a story about it.
The media looks for a martyr, the Pit bull is this generations 'dangerous dog' (which is funny, as, like I said MANY of these dogs are not actually pit bulls, just bully-LIKE dogs, if that). If you want some proof about how pit bulls are not blood thirsty killers by default - look up the breeds history. They used to be known as "America's Dog" and were actually extremely popular choices for families and children. They were used in the military (WW1), in the media (Little rascals) and were commonly referred to as 'The Nanny Dog' for their patience, good temperament and protection of young children. Hell, they even score very high on the temperament test compared to most other breeds.
[New York Giants] | [Anaheim Angels] | [Los Angeles Lakers]
**We don't negotiate with feminists Crew**
**Patrice O'Neal/Black Phillip Show Crew (RIP)**
**Kevin Samuels Crew (RIP)**
**Kanye West has 6 classic albums AND named the TRIBE therefore he is GOATED Crew**
02-11-2017, 09:35 PM
-
#53
- F1exAppeal
- Registered User
-
- F1exAppeal
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2012
- Posts: 2,853
- Rep Power: 7815
-
-
Originally Posted By dj924s⏩
Kind of like you don't leave a tiger alone with a child right?? Anyone should be able to own a tiger. All tiger attacks are not the tigers fault but the owner. If you have a proper owner the chance of an attack goes down dramatically."The owners of Camo, the pit bull involved, say there were not home when the attack happened but that those with the dog were told not to let the dog near any children."
"those with the dog were told not to let the dog near any children."
If you missed it.
"those with the dog were told not to let the dog near any children."
"those with the dog were told not to let the dog near any children."
If you missed it.
"those with the dog were told not to let the dog near any children."
02-11-2017, 09:36 PM
-
#54
- CptClean
- Registered Hustler
-
- CptClean
- Registered Hustler
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 5,300
- Rep Power: 18485
-
-
Originally Posted By ToPHeR35⏩
Well actually pitbulls were responsible for 900% more deaths than rottweilers in 2015, and these aren't stories I'm hearing on the media these are the collected statistics...I don't think they should be banned either no fukking way am I gonna let the government tell me what dog I'm allowed to own but people trying to dispute that pitbulls are naturally aggressive violent dogs are so delusional it's disturbing.So using your logic bad dog owners also choose Rottweilers. Dog breed stats are irrelevant because of how often breeds are mislabeled. The problem is alot of dogs are labeled as pitbulls even though they're a mix or a type of bulldog. Most people who label pitbulls don't even know what a true one looks like.
The reason why you hear more about pit bulls attacking on the news than any other breed is that it is sensationalist news. In the past, it has been GSDs, rottweilers, and dobermans that were the "crazy killer dogs that will turn on you in an instant". News companies report on things that get people riled up, as it gets them attention. I think the issue is really at the point where they keep doing it just because there is SO much debate about the inherent violent tendencies of the breed. Give it a few years, it will likely be another breed thrown under the media bus.
This can be further proved by looking at news articles about dog bites- MOST do not include pictures, those that do often do not include pictures of the offending dog (I saw one just last week that was clearly labeled 'stock photo of a pit bull' under the photo). There have been reports of news organizations claiming that dogs like BEAGLES and LABS were pit bulls, just to have a story about it.
The media looks for a martyr, the Pit bull is this generations 'dangerous dog' (which is funny, as, like I said MANY of these dogs are not actually pit bulls, just bully-LIKE dogs, if that). If you want some proof about how pit bulls are not blood thirsty killers by default - look up the breeds history. They used to be known as "America's Dog" and were actually extremely popular choices for families and children. They were used in the military (WW1), in the media (Little rascals) and were commonly referred to as 'The Nanny Dog' for their patience, good temperament and protection of young children. Hell, they even score very high on the temperament test compared to most other breeds.
The reason why you hear more about pit bulls attacking on the news than any other breed is that it is sensationalist news. In the past, it has been GSDs, rottweilers, and dobermans that were the "crazy killer dogs that will turn on you in an instant". News companies report on things that get people riled up, as it gets them attention. I think the issue is really at the point where they keep doing it just because there is SO much debate about the inherent violent tendencies of the breed. Give it a few years, it will likely be another breed thrown under the media bus.
This can be further proved by looking at news articles about dog bites- MOST do not include pictures, those that do often do not include pictures of the offending dog (I saw one just last week that was clearly labeled 'stock photo of a pit bull' under the photo). There have been reports of news organizations claiming that dogs like BEAGLES and LABS were pit bulls, just to have a story about it.
The media looks for a martyr, the Pit bull is this generations 'dangerous dog' (which is funny, as, like I said MANY of these dogs are not actually pit bulls, just bully-LIKE dogs, if that). If you want some proof about how pit bulls are not blood thirsty killers by default - look up the breeds history. They used to be known as "America's Dog" and were actually extremely popular choices for families and children. They were used in the military (WW1), in the media (Little rascals) and were commonly referred to as 'The Nanny Dog' for their patience, good temperament and protection of young children. Hell, they even score very high on the temperament test compared to most other breeds.
Pitbulls can be GOOD dogs with GOOD owners not the other way around they are inherently agressive.
One day scientists are going to kill us all.
02-11-2017, 09:37 PM
-
#55
- leoslayer1
- Registered User
-
- leoslayer1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: United States
- Age: 56
- Posts: 27,840
- Rep Power: 194666
-
-
Originally Posted By BloodyBaron⏩
It was a track rescue Greyhound. Tried to kill him. Belonged to a friend of my wife who was babysitting him.RAGE.
Was it your own pitbull? Or somebody elses? How did your child get near such a disgusting creature?
Holy fuk..I'm so sorry man.
Was it your own pitbull? Or somebody elses? How did your child get near such a disgusting creature?
Holy fuk..I'm so sorry man.
U
02-11-2017, 09:37 PM
-
#56
02-11-2017, 09:38 PM
-
#57
- YeaRightBuddy
- Registered User
-
- YeaRightBuddy
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Age: 32
- Posts: 1,660
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By dj924s⏩
The person who didn't obey leash laws?? Lol"If a stray pitbull has offspring and his offspring kill your kid at the park."
This wasn't the case in the OP, but since you want to branch off into a hypothetical.
Answer: The person who didn't obey leash laws.
People kill more people than dogs kill people,,,,,,,,,so...... ban people?
Personal responsibility <---- This IS the ONLY logic.
But yeah hey instead of owning up to a mistake let's blame________ <--- fill in the blank with any object that will make you FEEL like it's not you fault. smh
This wasn't the case in the OP, but since you want to branch off into a hypothetical.
Answer: The person who didn't obey leash laws.
People kill more people than dogs kill people,,,,,,,,,so...... ban people?
Personal responsibility <---- This IS the ONLY logic.
But yeah hey instead of owning up to a mistake let's blame________ <--- fill in the blank with any object that will make you FEEL like it's not you fault. smh
You gonna go back decades to find that person? Dogs dont start off in human possession overtime Lol
"Sorry Mam but your child was killed by a stray who comes from a generation of strays and back then there were no such tthings as leash laws....so.....sorry good luck at the funeral!"
Lol at your thinking. People kill PEOPLE. Animals are killing PEOPLE. Are you gonna tell me next that lions and tigers should be allowed to be owned too?
do you get that? Or should I say it again
02-11-2017, 09:39 PM
-
#58
- ToPHeR35
- Civil Tradie
-
- ToPHeR35
- Civil Tradie
- Join Date: Mar 2008
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Posts: 16,772
- Rep Power: 38522
-
-
Originally Posted By CptClean⏩
Again, the statistics you reference have no proof that said dogs are actually pitbulls.Well actually pitbulls were responsible for 900% more deaths than rottweilers in 2015, and these aren't stories I'm hearing on the media these are the collected statistics...I don't think they should be banned either no fukking way am I gonna let the government tell me what dog I'm allowed to own but people trying to dispute that pitbulls are naturally aggressive violent dogs are so delusional it's disturbing.
Pitbulls can be GOOD dogs with GOOD owners not the other way around they are inherently agressive.
Pitbulls can be GOOD dogs with GOOD owners not the other way around they are inherently agressive.
02-11-2017, 09:40 PM
-
#59
- F1exAppeal
- Registered User
-
- F1exAppeal
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2012
- Posts: 2,853
- Rep Power: 7815
-
-
Originally Posted By dj924s⏩
So you think it's OK for people to own lions and go walking down the street with it? As long as it's on a leash?? Srs question.Full disclosure I own two rottweilers one is not only fully capable of attacking she is specifically trained to do so (schutzhund).
With the "logic" of banning animals capable of harming humans, you would also be inclined to ban people from living in a climate where the temp can get below 32 degrees f because 15 people a year are killed by icicles, and only 10 a year by dogs. While we are at it we're going to need to do away with anything poisonous, flamable, higher than 18", deeper than 1/4", and harder than nerf.
......And even after all of this a negligent parent will still find a way to blame something for their own irresponsibility.
or
Maybe we can hold people accountable for their own actions, or in-actions.
With the "logic" of banning animals capable of harming humans, you would also be inclined to ban people from living in a climate where the temp can get below 32 degrees f because 15 people a year are killed by icicles, and only 10 a year by dogs. While we are at it we're going to need to do away with anything poisonous, flamable, higher than 18", deeper than 1/4", and harder than nerf.
......And even after all of this a negligent parent will still find a way to blame something for their own irresponsibility.
or
Maybe we can hold people accountable for their own actions, or in-actions.
EDIT: for the record I am 100% for people being held accountable for their own actions, I don't care whose fault it is frankly. But there's just some things that the general public should not be able to own if it puts that much danger to the public. If we treat pitbulls the same way we treat dangerous exotic animals, I would be fine with that. At the end of the day, I would never put my kid near a pit bull or any other dog that I am not 90% familiar with.
If I'm there lol I have a VERY strong kick.
02-11-2017, 09:41 PM
-
#60
- YeaRightBuddy
- Registered User
-
- YeaRightBuddy
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Age: 32
- Posts: 1,660
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By F1exAppeal⏩
Lol thisKind of like you don't leave a tiger alone with a child right?? Anyone should be able to own a tiger. All tiger attacks are not the tigers fault but the owner. If you have a proper owner the chance of an attack goes down dramatically.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts