Forum
ยป
Be VERY careful about taking women past 26-27 seriously
02-17-2017, 09:00 AM
-
#481
- CodyZellery
- Almost Chad
-
- CodyZellery
- Almost Chad
- Join Date: Jul 2015
- Age: 33
- Posts: 12,737
- Rep Power: 70131
-
-
Originally Posted By RC2008⏩
Reps for life.ESPECIALLY if they are above average in looks. There is NOTHING remotely normal about a woman who is single at the age of say 27 and is decent looking. By this age, there is logically speaking no reason whatsoever why a woman should be single. Unless she is a widow or has been dealing with some other problems preventing her from being locked down.
Even women in their early to mid 20s are dangerous to fuk with on a serious level. Casually sure. But past 21-23 maybe 24? Lmfao.
And Just LMFAO @ single women in their 30s.
Even women in their early to mid 20s are dangerous to fuk with on a serious level. Casually sure. But past 21-23 maybe 24? Lmfao.
And Just LMFAO @ single women in their 30s.
5'10 176lbs
No hymen no diamond
02-17-2017, 09:03 AM
-
#482
02-17-2017, 09:15 AM
-
#483
- sunchine
- Registered User
-
- sunchine
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2016
- Location: Spain
- Age: 35
- Posts: 1,385
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
That's a bad generalization to make
Maybe she started dating someone at age 22, he had personal issues, couldn't handle them, she supported him, he spiraled down into alcoholism and violence and whatnot, and she was forced to cut things off at 27.
Maybe some other thing
There's a infinite amount of possible scenarios
I agree that you always have to be skeptical with women but if you make sweeping generalisations like that you're only hurting yourself because you're setting standards that are absurdly high and not rooted in reality to a large extent.
Maybe she started dating someone at age 22, he had personal issues, couldn't handle them, she supported him, he spiraled down into alcoholism and violence and whatnot, and she was forced to cut things off at 27.
Maybe some other thing
There's a infinite amount of possible scenarios
I agree that you always have to be skeptical with women but if you make sweeping generalisations like that you're only hurting yourself because you're setting standards that are absurdly high and not rooted in reality to a large extent.
02-17-2017, 01:10 PM
-
#484
- CodyZellery
- Almost Chad
-
- CodyZellery
- Almost Chad
- Join Date: Jul 2015
- Age: 33
- Posts: 12,737
- Rep Power: 70131
-
-
Originally Posted By sunchine⏩
Location: SpainThat's a bad generalization to make
Maybe she started dating someone at age 22, he had personal issues, couldn't handle them, she supported him, he spiraled down into alcoholism and violence and whatnot, and she was forced to cut things off at 27.
Maybe some other thing
There's a infinite amount of possible scenarios
I agree that you always have to be skeptical with women but if you make sweeping generalisations like that you're only hurting yourself because you're setting standards that are absurdly high and not rooted in reality to a large extent.
Maybe she started dating someone at age 22, he had personal issues, couldn't handle them, she supported him, he spiraled down into alcoholism and violence and whatnot, and she was forced to cut things off at 27.
Maybe some other thing
There's a infinite amount of possible scenarios
I agree that you always have to be skeptical with women but if you make sweeping generalisations like that you're only hurting yourself because you're setting standards that are absurdly high and not rooted in reality to a large extent.
5'10 176lbs
No hymen no diamond
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts