Forum
»
Some dude impregnates online sloot in ONS, ruins his life lulz
05-02-2017, 04:18 AM
-
#31
Originally Posted By Sebstan01⏩
Repped. /threadI have some knowledge of family law. The problem with this bloke's circumstances is that, there is zero intention to take responsibility on his part, and every right to push some blame onto the other person in question: specifically, the woman who has borne his child. The fact of the matter is, if you are responsible in part for the birth of a child, you have to be held responsible for subsequent future events *in regards* to that child. He could have taken steps to ensure that the woman in question didn't get pregnant. Unfortunately, due to his own poor thinking/planning, he is in this situation.
In regards to him "never seeing his child again", that is a matter of hearsay. Keep in mind, this is not a court report; merely some article. It may as well be a 'he said, she said' dialogue. The fact of the matter is, he was instrumental in the birth of a child. Hence, logic dictates that he should have culpability regarding the life of that child. Don't be emotional; be objective. There are consequences for every action, and this is but one of such.
In the same way that anyone would criticise a woman for not taking precautions regarding birth control (and later, complaining about raising a child), so should this man be given the same treatment. Be objective, folks.
In regards to him "never seeing his child again", that is a matter of hearsay. Keep in mind, this is not a court report; merely some article. It may as well be a 'he said, she said' dialogue. The fact of the matter is, he was instrumental in the birth of a child. Hence, logic dictates that he should have culpability regarding the life of that child. Don't be emotional; be objective. There are consequences for every action, and this is but one of such.
In the same way that anyone would criticise a woman for not taking precautions regarding birth control (and later, complaining about raising a child), so should this man be given the same treatment. Be objective, folks.
05-02-2017, 04:20 AM
-
#32
05-02-2017, 04:23 AM
-
#33
- MrDevereaux
- Registered User
-
- MrDevereaux
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2014
- Posts: 5,480
- Rep Power: 26857
-
-
Originally Posted By PKneyr⏩
Well it's financially pretty rewarding from the sounds of it!WHY IN THE FUK DO YOU DECIDE TO HAVE A CHILD WHEN YOU KNOW THE FATHER HAS NO PLAN ON STICKING AROUND? Can someone please explain their reasoning?
05-02-2017, 04:24 AM
-
#34
- Battlefury
- Savage the body.
-
- Battlefury
- Savage the body.
- Join Date: Jan 2014
- Location: United States Of America, Philippines
- Posts: 19,226
- Rep Power: 57673
-
-
Originally Posted By PKneyr⏩
Cause it's sex,people lose all their reasoning.WHY IN THE FUK DO YOU DECIDE TO HAVE A CHILD WHEN YOU KNOW THE FATHER HAS NO PLAN ON STICKING AROUND? Can someone please explain their reasoning?
☠️We are here to laugh at the odds and live our lives so well, that death will tremble to take us.☠️
🔥Equality is a lie, I am stronger!🔥
🩸Semen Retention for more aggression and motivation!🩸
☠️Death is just an illusion a transition of worlds,don’t fear it for your faith is already in the hands of the Gods.☠️
🔥Prayers,Rituals,Sacrifices,Symbolism.🔥
🔥Only those that can control the dark side can ever truly be free.🔥
05-02-2017, 04:26 AM
-
#35
- MrDevereaux
- Registered User
-
- MrDevereaux
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2014
- Posts: 5,480
- Rep Power: 26857
-
-
Originally Posted By Battlefury⏩
Um, wat, pretty sure she had a few MONTHS to make that decision after the sechs had finished.Cause it's sex,people lose all their reasoning.
05-02-2017, 04:29 AM
-
#36
- Battlefury
- Savage the body.
-
- Battlefury
- Savage the body.
- Join Date: Jan 2014
- Location: United States Of America, Philippines
- Posts: 19,226
- Rep Power: 57673
-
-
Originally Posted By MrDevereaux⏩
She don't want to abort.Um, wat, pretty sure she had a few MONTHS to make that decision after the sechs had finished.
☠️We are here to laugh at the odds and live our lives so well, that death will tremble to take us.☠️
🔥Equality is a lie, I am stronger!🔥
🩸Semen Retention for more aggression and motivation!🩸
☠️Death is just an illusion a transition of worlds,don’t fear it for your faith is already in the hands of the Gods.☠️
🔥Prayers,Rituals,Sacrifices,Symbolism.🔥
🔥Only those that can control the dark side can ever truly be free.🔥
05-02-2017, 04:30 AM
-
#37
Originally Posted By DDSF1⏩
I'm not entirely sure how having a child from a ONS translates to criminal behavior. Women naturally are caregivers. As such, they're normally the ones who will be most responsible for a child in cases like this. If both sides have joint custody and similar incomes, child support is mainly nil. I'm not advocating keeping the child support system as it is, but I want men to be more responsible with their dicks because they're just as important as the pedestal most out pussy on.Ifhe was so drunk he was raped. He is a victim. we don't know if he was raped and he never mentioned such in the article. Not only that, but he tried to get in touch with the woman to continue and she went NC on him
Why is he responsible for so much? you have to see what his and her annual incomes are, then add them into some formula. If she isn't working, then she's going to get more. The back dated support is what killed him.
Why are men beat down by the legal system? because the system is archaic and derived from a point in time when women didn't work. Now that this has changed dramatically, you may start to see more instances where women are the ones paying, not receiving( joint custody), or getting very little because she makes as much or more than the man does.
Why are so many eunuch cuckolds type "men" attacking men?Just because someone doesn't agree with the generalized misc logic about this topic doesn't make them cucks. If men still hookup with reandom sloots in 2017 and this is the outcome, then they deserve it. Protect yourself.
Why are woman not responsible, ever? Why are they treated like retarded children in society and legal system when it comes to responsibility and criminal/fraudulent behavior?
Why is he responsible for so much? you have to see what his and her annual incomes are, then add them into some formula. If she isn't working, then she's going to get more. The back dated support is what killed him.
Why are men beat down by the legal system? because the system is archaic and derived from a point in time when women didn't work. Now that this has changed dramatically, you may start to see more instances where women are the ones paying, not receiving( joint custody), or getting very little because she makes as much or more than the man does.
Why are so many eunuch cuckolds type "men" attacking men?Just because someone doesn't agree with the generalized misc logic about this topic doesn't make them cucks. If men still hookup with reandom sloots in 2017 and this is the outcome, then they deserve it. Protect yourself.
Why are woman not responsible, ever? Why are they treated like retarded children in society and legal system when it comes to responsibility and criminal/fraudulent behavior?
05-02-2017, 04:31 AM
-
#38
- mcdojo
- Registered User
-
- mcdojo
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Age: 36
- Posts: 19,514
- Rep Power: 42360
-
-
Originally Posted By Sebstan01⏩
Someone got a pass on a first year law unit and now thinks they're Harvey SpecterI have some knowledge of family law. The problem with this bloke's circumstances is that, there is zero intention to take responsibility on his part, and every right to push some blame onto the other person in question: specifically, the woman who has borne his child. The fact of the matter is, if you are responsible in part for the birth of a child, you have to be held responsible for subsequent future events *in regards* to that child. He could have taken steps to ensure that the woman in question didn't get pregnant. Unfortunately, due to his own poor thinking/planning, he is in this situation.
In regards to him "never seeing his child again", that is a matter of hearsay. Keep in mind, this is not a court report; merely some article. It may as well be a 'he said, she said' dialogue. The fact of the matter is, he was instrumental in the birth of a child. Hence, logic dictates that he should have culpability regarding the life of that child. Don't be emotional; be objective. There are consequences for every action, and this is but one of such.
In the same way that anyone would criticise a woman for not taking precautions regarding birth control (and later, complaining about raising a child), so should this man be given the same treatment. Be objective, folks.
In regards to him "never seeing his child again", that is a matter of hearsay. Keep in mind, this is not a court report; merely some article. It may as well be a 'he said, she said' dialogue. The fact of the matter is, he was instrumental in the birth of a child. Hence, logic dictates that he should have culpability regarding the life of that child. Don't be emotional; be objective. There are consequences for every action, and this is but one of such.
In the same way that anyone would criticise a woman for not taking precautions regarding birth control (and later, complaining about raising a child), so should this man be given the same treatment. Be objective, folks.
05-02-2017, 04:38 AM
-
#39
- UnclRuckus
- No relation
-
- UnclRuckus
- No relation
- Join Date: Apr 2015
- Location: inb4 quote, Sweden
- Age: 34
- Posts: 3,871
- Rep Power: 15862
-
-
Originally Posted By Letthemcome⏩
Yeah, talking about who is more responsible for a problem that has already happened is such a pointless affair when the problem is easily solvable. There is no argument against abortion unless you are a religious nutjob, in which case your argument is null and void anyway. If the state doesn't want to support single mothers then I think women should be forced to undergo financial review upon impregnation. If they can't support the child without leeching off a man they have no relationship with then it needs to be terminated.Agreed. Where abortion is legal she has 100% control. She should be able to take the father to small claims for half the cost of the abort and that is it. Beyond that she should be 100% responsible. There's no counter-argument against this, just people looking for an excuse to make it sound like it's an equal affair. And the government avoiding it because the amount spent on single mothers already is exceptional and the system would collapse if they stopped extorting fathers to cover these costs.
There's also the whole women's rights bullchit, it's impossible to change these pro-women support systems because feminists would just claim patriarchal oppression and systematic misogyny if they lost some of their financial privileges.
Without the internet i feel like a small rock on the mountain.
I don't really want my posts on the internet tbh ... I'm just legit addicted to posting ... people become addicted to the internet look it up
05-02-2017, 04:38 AM
-
#40
Originally Posted By PKneyr⏩
I'm going to speculate and hypothesize for a moment,WHY IN THE FUK DO YOU DECIDE TO HAVE A CHILD WHEN YOU KNOW THE FATHER HAS NO PLAN ON STICKING AROUND? Can someone please explain their reasoning?
-Intially she didn't know who the father was, meaning she may have found someone who she actually liked and wanted to be the father while being a sloot.
-Once it was known that he wasn't the father, she went looking for the real one. This is where things get messy. She could potentially stay with the guy(who probably had a decent job) who she thinks is great, collect the child support check from the idiot, and live amazing. On the other hand, she could just be a sloot with no job or a medial job who really needs the money to help support the child. In either instance, because she's raising the child 100% of the time, she's going to get full support.
05-02-2017, 04:39 AM
-
#41
- jtaylor2010
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,185
- Rep Power: 441422
-
-
Originally Posted By Letthemcome⏩
Right, so let's allow the guys to walk away with no responsibility and have society pitch in to pay for the cost of raising the child. I agree though that men should have a say in preventing an abortion and it's fukked up that they don't. Still, the number of kids in broken homes has increased enormously since abortion was made legal. Why? Because people aren't held responsible for their own actions so they expect other people or entities to fix their mistake and act a lot less responsibly(as shown in the OP). I'm not arguing whether she should or shouldn't have an abortion, I'm saying that her choosing to have the kid doesn't absolve the father of his responsibilities.Agreed. Where abortion is legal she has 100% control. She should be able to take the father to small claims for half the cost of the abort and that is it. Beyond that she should be 100% responsible. There's no counter-argument against this, just people looking for an excuse to make it sound like it's an equal affair. And the government avoiding it because the amount spent on single mothers already is exceptional and the system would collapse if they stopped extorting fathers to cover these costs.
05-02-2017, 04:39 AM
-
#42
- bongowongo
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Posts: 40,346
- Rep Power: 184703
-
-
Did he make a mistake? yes
But that doesnt excuse the situation he's fallen into and how this sloot is playing the system and ruined his life at the same time. Not to mention the kid isnt growing up in a stable home.
Sad situation all around. SAD!
But that doesnt excuse the situation he's fallen into and how this sloot is playing the system and ruined his life at the same time. Not to mention the kid isnt growing up in a stable home.
Sad situation all around. SAD!
Sig line can't be a novel
05-02-2017, 04:42 AM
-
#43
- Clkflynn
- Registered User
-
- Clkflynn
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2016
- Age: 32
- Posts: 4,817
- Rep Power: 3048
-
-
Dude is pathetic
had it coming lul
had it coming lul
!Only friends are family crew!
!Die alone crew!
!Balding crew!
!Kissless crew!
!Only girl who has smiled at me is Mom crew!
!Left Nofap crew!
!Still watch porn crew!
Eternal Monk for the next 62 years seeking that divinity.
05-02-2017, 04:45 AM
-
#44
- UnclRuckus
- No relation
-
- UnclRuckus
- No relation
- Join Date: Apr 2015
- Location: inb4 quote, Sweden
- Age: 34
- Posts: 3,871
- Rep Power: 15862
-
-
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
It does absolve him of responsibilities because she could have asked him "do you intend to be a part of this child's life and help me support him" when she was pregnant. Had he said no to this, as he most certainly would, then she could easily have terminated. She didn't do this because she had no interest in giving this kid a stable environment, she just wanted a kid to fill the void in herself and decided to let this ******* pay for it. He didn't have a choice but she did, therefore she must be 100% responsible for that choice. She was the one who made it, not him. She went through with the pregnancy, not him.Right, so let's allow the guys to walk away with no responsibility and have society pitch in to pay for the cost of raising the child. I agree though that men should have a say in preventing an abortion and it's fukked up that they don't. Still, the number of kids in broken homes has increased enormously since abortion was made legal. Why? Because people aren't held responsible for their own actions so they expect other people or entities to fix their mistake and act a lot less responsibly(as shown in the OP). I'm not arguing whether she should or shouldn't have an abortion, I'm saying that her choosing to have the kid doesn't absolve the father of his responsibilities.
Saying that abortions lead to more children in broken homes is ridiculous. Guess what, divorce rates have gone way up as the number of pirates on the seven seas diminished. Do you think these two phenomenon are related? Of course they are not. Neither are abortions and unstable home environments. It has to do with changing norms in society and dating habits etc. Nothing to do with abortion.
Edit: that is to say, they might be related, but they are more than likely not causally related. Correlation does not equal causation.
Without the internet i feel like a small rock on the mountain.
I don't really want my posts on the internet tbh ... I'm just legit addicted to posting ... people become addicted to the internet look it up
05-02-2017, 04:48 AM
-
#45
Originally Posted By bongowongo⏩
She's not "playing the system". That is the system. A father should be held responsible for his child, regardless of the fact whether he wanted it or not.Did he make a mistake? yes
But that doesnt excuse the situation he's fallen into and how this sloot is playing the system and ruined his life at the same time. Not to mention the kid isnt growing up in a stable home.
Sad situation all around. SAD!
But that doesnt excuse the situation he's fallen into and how this sloot is playing the system and ruined his life at the same time. Not to mention the kid isnt growing up in a stable home.
Sad situation all around. SAD!
05-02-2017, 04:50 AM
-
#46
- Kev1972
- Registered User
-
- Kev1972
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2013
- Location: Big Arm, Montana, United States
- Posts: 49,924
- Rep Power: 287644
-
-
Originally Posted By UnclRuckus⏩
Dis you?Honestly I'm starting to think that the best solution if you knock up a sloot, if you can't talk her out of the pregnancy, is just to murder her. That or leave the country. Doesn't really give you a lot of other options. If pregnant women started turning up in dumpsters maybe this child support system would get some long overdue looking at.
That's bullchit. It's the woman who has the baby and so it is ultimately her responsibility to prevent pregnancies. Yes, he could have worn a rubber, but she could have been taking contraceptives and failing that she could have taken plan B after. Even failing that she could have had an abortion. Meanwhile, after sex the man is completely powerless to prevent the pregnancy.
The woman has 100% control over terminating the pregnancy and so should be 100% responsible for it also. A child isn't born unless the woman actually wants it to be born and the man has very little say in the matter.
That's bullchit. It's the woman who has the baby and so it is ultimately her responsibility to prevent pregnancies. Yes, he could have worn a rubber, but she could have been taking contraceptives and failing that she could have taken plan B after. Even failing that she could have had an abortion. Meanwhile, after sex the man is completely powerless to prevent the pregnancy.
The woman has 100% control over terminating the pregnancy and so should be 100% responsible for it also. A child isn't born unless the woman actually wants it to be born and the man has very little say in the matter.
Motorcycle crew
Army veteran crew
One Meal a day crew
05-02-2017, 04:52 AM
-
#47
Originally Posted By UnclRuckus⏩
How do you know she has no interest in providing a stable environment? Her actions (ensuring that the father contributes to the welfare of the child) are pretty much the definition of providing a stable environment. The fact that the ******* doesn't seem to want to be a part of the child's life is something she can't influence, and I don't see how that fact, especially from an ONS, should play a significant role in deciding to terminate or not - many, many, many stable children/adults brought up in a single parent household are testament to this.It does absolve him of responsibilities because she could have asked him "do you intend to be a part of this child's life and help me support him" when she was pregnant. Had he said no to this, as he most certainly would, then she could easily have terminated. She didn't do this because she had no interest in giving this kid a stable environment, she just wanted a kid to fill the void in herself and decided to let this ******* pay for it.
05-02-2017, 04:54 AM
-
#48
- UnclRuckus
- No relation
-
- UnclRuckus
- No relation
- Join Date: Apr 2015
- Location: inb4 quote, Sweden
- Age: 34
- Posts: 3,871
- Rep Power: 15862
-
-
Originally Posted By 3maj⏩
Because she made no effort to connect with the dude before having the child. They never discussed the future of the kid. She called him and said she was pregnant, he said not to go through with it and that was it. That's not being a responsible, planning adult. What she is doing now is trying to secure her own future by having him pay her. It has nothing to do with the kid. She got the child because she wanted a kid for herself with no thought to the well being of the child, it's plain as day. If she wanted the best environment for a child then maybe she should have tried to set up a functioning relationship with a man first.How do you know she has no interest in providing a stable environment? Her actions (ensuring that the father contributes to the welfare of the child) are pretty much the definition of providing a stable environment. The fact that the ******* doesn't seem to want to be a part of the child's life is something she can't influence, and I don't see how that fact, especially from an ONS, should play a significant role in deciding to terminate or not - many, many, many stable children/adults brought up in a single parent household are testament to this.
Without the internet i feel like a small rock on the mountain.
I don't really want my posts on the internet tbh ... I'm just legit addicted to posting ... people become addicted to the internet look it up
05-02-2017, 04:55 AM
-
#49
- Tyrannosaur88
- King Of The Dinosaurs
-
- Tyrannosaur88
- King Of The Dinosaurs
- Join Date: Oct 2013
- Posts: 1,223
- Rep Power: 4081
-
-
Originally Posted By Battlefury⏩
That was his point, idiot.She don't want to abort.
WHY wouldn't she want to abort given the ****ty existence it will be forced to grow up in. Your reply about sex made no sense.
*Misc resident dinosaur and animal expert*
*Fossil hunting and collecting crew*
*Metal detecting crew*
*Palaeontology crew*
*Too many similar and obscure crews crew*
05-02-2017, 04:59 AM
-
#50
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
This. So many of the worlds problems are idiot humans who can't exercise control impulse. "Oh I am horny, logic is out the window". Sure you get in the blue ball zone and you let some things pass that you normally wouldn't, but things like condoms, a random girl off the net etc, they should ring bells no matter what state you in. If they don't, then you just have a pretty weak mental state. While the system is completely criminal in my eyes how fuked over the male can be by governments in this situation, he still should have not stuck his dik in some crazy online slut.Maybe if more people realize their d!ck has the power to create human life and treat it with the respect such a powerful tool deserves they wouldn't be in this situation. Are we supposed to feel bad for the guy because he has to pay for the expenses that go along with raising a child? Fukk him. I feel bad for the kid for having sh!tty parents and having to be raised in a broken home but don't feel bad at all for the parents. They both knew how babies are made.
Cliffs- he should stop crying and fist himself
Cliffs- he should stop crying and fist himself
This kid has a rough road ahead to be a normal intelligent human with these 2 as the parents.
EoR is powered by unique Nanomolecular Hyperdispersion Technology. Giving him high bioavailability and myocellular saturation.
05-02-2017, 05:09 AM
-
#51
Originally Posted By UnclRuckus⏩
She was very much a responsible adult - told him she's pregnant, told him she's not sure it's his. Well played. HE immediately expressed his disinterest/unwillingness to participate in this process. This DOES NOT mean that the kid is doomed, or that she should automatically decide to abort - she may want to have a child and has no objection to raising it by herself - this still doesn't absolve the father of his financial obligations. Again, a single parent situation is not ideal, but it's far from a death sentence you portray it as and is definitely better than a dual parent situation where one parent is resentful and doesn't want to be involved.Because she made no effort to connect with the dude before having the child. They never discussed the future of the kid. She called him and said she was pregnant, he said not to go through with it and that was it. That's not being a responsible, planning adult. What she is doing now is trying to secure her own future by having him pay her. It has nothing to do with the kid. She got the child because she wanted a kid for herself with no thought to the well being of the child, it's plain as day. If she wanted the best environment for a child then maybe she should have tried to set up a functioning relationship with a man first.
05-02-2017, 05:09 AM
-
#52
Originally Posted By UnclRuckus⏩
Securing her future with ~800 dollars a month? Gtfo. Also, she didn't know who the father was and it wasn't until she had the courts issue paternity tests did she find him.Because she made no effort to connect with the dude before having the child. They never discussed the future of the kid. She called him and said she was pregnant, he said not to go through with it and that was it. That's not being a responsible, planning adult. What she is doing now is trying to secure her own future by having him pay her. It has nothing to do with the kid. She got the child because she wanted a kid for herself with no thought to the well being of the child, it's plain as day. If she wanted the best environment for a child then maybe she should have tried to set up a functioning relationship with a man first.
05-02-2017, 05:13 AM
-
#53
- brrealtea
- Registered User
-
- brrealtea
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2013
- Posts: 7,783
- Rep Power: 13744
-
-
Originally Posted By Sebstan01⏩
Well, he should have a say on whether he wants to fully support a child or or not just like how a woman has 100% say to kill the baby or not. If he doesn't agree, he should just pay a much smaller amount of money since he didn't consent.I have some knowledge of family law. The problem with this bloke's circumstances is that, there is zero intention to take responsibility on his part, and every right to push some blame onto the other person in question: specifically, the woman who has borne his child. The fact of the matter is, if you are responsible in part for the birth of a child, you have to be held responsible for subsequent future events *in regards* to that child. He could have taken steps to ensure that the woman in question didn't get pregnant. Unfortunately, due to his own poor thinking/planning, he is in this situation.
In regards to him "never seeing his child again", that is a matter of hearsay. Keep in mind, this is not a court report; merely some article. It may as well be a 'he said, she said' dialogue. The fact of the matter is, he was instrumental in the birth of a child. Hence, logic dictates that he should have culpability regarding the life of that child. Don't be emotional; be objective. There are consequences for every action, and this is but one of such.
In the same way that anyone would criticise a woman for not taking precautions regarding birth control (and later, complaining about raising a child), so should this man be given the same treatment. Be objective, folks.
In regards to him "never seeing his child again", that is a matter of hearsay. Keep in mind, this is not a court report; merely some article. It may as well be a 'he said, she said' dialogue. The fact of the matter is, he was instrumental in the birth of a child. Hence, logic dictates that he should have culpability regarding the life of that child. Don't be emotional; be objective. There are consequences for every action, and this is but one of such.
In the same way that anyone would criticise a woman for not taking precautions regarding birth control (and later, complaining about raising a child), so should this man be given the same treatment. Be objective, folks.
Survivor crew.
05-02-2017, 05:19 AM
-
#54
- A-GAME
- Pedicabo ego vos et irrum
-
- A-GAME
- Pedicabo ego vos et irrum
- Join Date: Nov 2006
- Posts: 47,648
- Rep Power: 280053
-
-
Originally Posted By Letthemcome⏩
Wot? How about taking responsibility for your actions? What did you think was gonna happen when you came inside a sloot you met on the internet? Jesus Christ you would have to be retarded not to understand this. Do you even misc? If you want sympathy, go and get cancer, *******.The government needs to recognise the impact this is having on men’s lives.
Still Cuckin On Four Fours, Wrapped In Four Voes
05-02-2017, 05:21 AM
-
#55
- MongoloidMike
- Banned
-
- MongoloidMike
- Banned
- Join Date: Jul 2011
- Location: SA, Australia
- Posts: 2,085
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
YOU'RE responsible for YOUR own body. If YOU can get pregnant then YOU have to take steps to prevent it.
If she wanted an abortion and he didn't, would she keep the baby? Of course not.
The very least the courts can do is give the guy a financial abortion.
If she wanted an abortion and he didn't, would she keep the baby? Of course not.
The very least the courts can do is give the guy a financial abortion.
05-02-2017, 05:22 AM
-
#56
- JPF82
- Registered User
-
- JPF82
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 19,869
- Rep Power: 63172
-
-
Originally Posted By cookiefiend⏩
All of this right here.Shouldn't have cheated, drunk drove, and took the chance of knocking up a random.
Lol at him.
Sucks for the kid though.
Lol at him.
Sucks for the kid though.
If you fellas want to have a seat I will tell you my story. It's quick.
My sons mother used me to have a son, took about a week and a half for her to get pregnant.
She gave me the option to leave, sign papers but I would never see him ever.
I said no, fuk that......doesn't matter the reasons you used me, lets do it.
She stayed at home, i worked full time to pay the bills till he was 4-5?
She started seeing someone so it was a mutual move out of her house.
My son is 9 and I don't give a fuk what any misc'er thinks about my situation, my sons pretty fuking awesome and would not trade it for the world of the feelings and emotions involved with him and watching him grow up. Yeah, not the best environment but hes smart, and understands......
The guy in OP's story just sounds like a typical miscer, "h-hello, u-umm can I p-put penis in vagina with no rubber m'lady?" And expect nothing would ever happen.
I knew it was possible to get my sons mother prego, just didn't know she only wanted a child out of our relationship.
Drunk driving and cheating? bleh, sumbish is getting a symbolic sense of karma, sadly this child is paying more than the guy is.
05-02-2017, 05:24 AM
-
#57
- BigAnusBoy
- Banned
-
- BigAnusBoy
- Banned
- Join Date: May 2016
- Age: 44
- Posts: 1,270
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Drunk drove 250kms to cheat on his gf.. suck ****
05-02-2017, 05:25 AM
-
#58
- JPF82
- Registered User
-
- JPF82
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 19,869
- Rep Power: 63172
-
-
Originally Posted By MongoloidMike⏩
You on some retard time bruh?YOU'RE responsible for YOU'RE own body. If YOU can get pregnant then YOU have to take steps to prevent it.
If she wanted an abortion and he didn't, would she keep the baby? Of course not.
The very least the courts can do is give the guy a financial abortion.
If she wanted an abortion and he didn't, would she keep the baby? Of course not.
The very least the courts can do is give the guy a financial abortion.
I know that you will never know this, but you have to have sex to get pregnant.....only one sex can carry the child......it takes 2 people at bare minimum to get pregnant....
05-02-2017, 05:26 AM
-
#59
- aherpderp
- Verified 100% Straight ☑️
-
- aherpderp
- Verified 100% Straight ☑️
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Posts: 4,329
- Rep Power: 8474
-
-
Let me get this straight
Guy went raw on a chick
Busted inside
Girl got pregnant
Guy knows the law has option for fathers to opt out financially
Guy gets ****ed
complains about it
Also would it have been better if he never signed? (assuming he knew he was the father but no one knew he knew)
Guy went raw on a chick
Busted inside
Girl got pregnant
Guy knows the law has option for fathers to opt out financially
Guy gets ****ed
complains about it
Also would it have been better if he never signed? (assuming he knew he was the father but no one knew he knew)
No glow No go crew
05-02-2017, 05:27 AM
-
#60
- JPF82
- Registered User
-
- JPF82
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 19,869
- Rep Power: 63172
-
-
Originally Posted By aherpderp⏩
If enough evidence is given, in the USA they can force you to do a swab for DNA match.Also would it have been better if he never signed? (assuming he knew he was the father but no one knew he knew)
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts