Forum
ยป
What was the hardest maths you had to do? (tradies stay out)
10-31-2017, 03:49 PM
-
#61
- PisseninMisc
- Registered User
-
- PisseninMisc
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Age: 40
- Posts: 16,596
- Rep Power: 141961
-
-
Who really cares about this mathematics stuff anyway? I have news for you: all numbers are made up.
There is really no 1 or 2 or 3. Someone at some point decided to call something 2 and something 3 and that 2 + 3 = 5. They could have just as easy defined it as 2 + 3 = 4 in which case 2 + 2 = 5 and so on.
Bottom line is this chit is all made up so why should I or anyone else care about studying it?
There is really no 1 or 2 or 3. Someone at some point decided to call something 2 and something 3 and that 2 + 3 = 5. They could have just as easy defined it as 2 + 3 = 4 in which case 2 + 2 = 5 and so on.
Bottom line is this chit is all made up so why should I or anyone else care about studying it?
*** Dawn Patrol Crew ***
Rustle me = get repped
10-31-2017, 03:51 PM
-
#62
- rectifryer
- enlightened
-
- rectifryer
- enlightened
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Posts: 25,634
- Rep Power: 208783
-
-
Originally Posted By FA*******⏩
Thats real similar to most prob and stats courses for engineers. IT was pretty fukking hard. I took it after dif eq/calc 3/linear algebra and it still sucked.Three things stand out:
ODEs, cause **** that.
Linear algebra. I am mentally incapable of grasping base transforms and changes of base.
(and doing that and Diff Eq at the same time damn near killed me).
Probability. The math itself was easy, but we had a prof from MIT and she taught it the MIT way. Ho lee ****.
This is a homework solution from MIT's course page, pretty similar to what our assignments looked like.

ODEs, cause **** that.
Linear algebra. I am mentally incapable of grasping base transforms and changes of base.
(and doing that and Diff Eq at the same time damn near killed me).
Probability. The math itself was easy, but we had a prof from MIT and she taught it the MIT way. Ho lee ****.
This is a homework solution from MIT's course page, pretty similar to what our assignments looked like.

Calc II was worse IMO.
Boycott foodservice industry crew
10-31-2017, 03:51 PM
-
#63
- butwhowasgains
- Neet slayer
-
- butwhowasgains
- Neet slayer
- Join Date: Dec 2015
- Location: New Zealand
- Posts: 12,680
- Rep Power: 77894
-
-
Originally Posted By PisseninMisc⏩
2 titties by any other names are still two titties doeWho really cares about this mathematics stuff anyway? I have news for you: all numbers are made up.
There is really no 1 or 2 or 3. Someone at some point decided to call something 2 and something 3 and that 2 + 3 = 5. They could have just as easy defined it as 2 + 3 = 4 in which case 2 + 2 = 5 and so on.
Bottom line is this chit is all made up so why should I or anyone else care about studying it?
There is really no 1 or 2 or 3. Someone at some point decided to call something 2 and something 3 and that 2 + 3 = 5. They could have just as easy defined it as 2 + 3 = 4 in which case 2 + 2 = 5 and so on.
Bottom line is this chit is all made up so why should I or anyone else care about studying it?
I have a dream, that one day, my username will be ironic.
Chairman of the purge.
Every post by this user is made soley for the enjoyment of cia analysts.
10-31-2017, 03:52 PM
-
#64
Originally Posted By PisseninMisc⏩
Because it is usefulWho really cares about this mathematics stuff anyway? I have news for you: all numbers are made up.
There is really no 1 or 2 or 3. Someone at some point decided to call something 2 and something 3 and that 2 + 3 = 5. They could have just as easy defined it as 2 + 3 = 4 in which case 2 + 2 = 5 and so on.
Bottom line is this chit is all made up so why should I or anyone else care about studying it?
There is really no 1 or 2 or 3. Someone at some point decided to call something 2 and something 3 and that 2 + 3 = 5. They could have just as easy defined it as 2 + 3 = 4 in which case 2 + 2 = 5 and so on.
Bottom line is this chit is all made up so why should I or anyone else care about studying it?
We invent the definitions, but the relationships are discovered, and they happen to be very useful for this other field of human knowledge known as physics, where we attempt to model and predict the behavior of the universe so that we can better dominate it rather than being beta twinks getting bottomed out by GAAAAAAAWDDDDDD
10-31-2017, 03:55 PM
-
#65
- PisseninMisc
- Registered User
-
- PisseninMisc
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Age: 40
- Posts: 16,596
- Rep Power: 141961
-
-
Originally Posted By butwhowasgains⏩
But if the guy who assigned numbers called it 3 we would all be talking about 3 titties not 2. Don't you think it's kind of archaic to teach our kids these symbols that were made up by a bunch of ancient dumbasses hundreds of years ago?2 titties by any other names are still two titties doe
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
That's exactly what I'm saying. If we didn't define these twinks as have a singular butthole, we could have been dominating double or even triple buttholed twinks a lot more efficiently.Because it is useful
We invent the definitions, but the relationships are discovered, and they happen to be very useful for this other field of human knowledge known as physics, where we attempt to model and predict the behavior of the universe so that we can better dominate it rather than being beta twinks getting bottomed out by GAAAAAAAWDDDDDD
We invent the definitions, but the relationships are discovered, and they happen to be very useful for this other field of human knowledge known as physics, where we attempt to model and predict the behavior of the universe so that we can better dominate it rather than being beta twinks getting bottomed out by GAAAAAAAWDDDDDD
*** Dawn Patrol Crew ***
Rustle me = get repped
10-31-2017, 03:55 PM
-
#66
Originally Posted By 11lemon11⏩
This is complete bullchit. Yeah, you need to follow the rules of inference. However, math has this issue which involves combinatorially explosive numbers of possible ways to approach a logical proof. So, yes, there are only a few rules to follow, but the number of possibilities becomes absurdly large. You require genuine creativity and intelligence to cleverly narrow down the possible approaches to proving some statement. Many mathematicians struggle to prove conjectures whose ramifications even are poorly understood. These people are literally expanding the boundaries of human knowledge of math. There is no simple algorithm they can follow to make progress in their research. It requires a great deal of intelligence and creativity to make progress there.Why is Maths difficult exactly? There are rules to follow. All you need do is follow them. That's what I heard from someone with a master's degree in mathematics from Oxford. .
10-31-2017, 04:05 PM
-
#67
not really math but doing P!=NP proofs in Intractability and Analytics of Algorithms
That one class was more difficult than the rest of my education combined
oddly enough , Calc2 was harder than calc1, 3, and linear algebra for me. Most people in the program say calc2 is the easiest of the 4
That one class was more difficult than the rest of my education combined
oddly enough , Calc2 was harder than calc1, 3, and linear algebra for me. Most people in the program say calc2 is the easiest of the 4
Originally Posted By PisseninMisc⏩
regardless of what the name is, numbers are used to quantify things. The ability to quantify things gave humans...everything we haveBut if the guy who assigned numbers called it 3 we would all be talking about 3 titties not 2. Don't you think it's kind of archaic to teach our kids these symbols that were made up by a bunch of ancient dumbasses hundreds of years ago?
That's exactly what I'm saying. If we didn't define these twinks as have a singular butthole, we could have been dominating double or even triple buttholed twinks a lot more efficiently.
That's exactly what I'm saying. If we didn't define these twinks as have a singular butthole, we could have been dominating double or even triple buttholed twinks a lot more efficiently.
MS, Computer Science
Feel free to PM me CS questions
10-31-2017, 04:07 PM
-
#68
- Oakbearer
- eets
-
- Oakbearer
- eets
- Join Date: Jul 2013
- Location: Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Posts: 3,760
- Rep Power: 2723
-
-
Originally Posted By FA*******⏩
this is basic probability bro.Three things stand out:
ODEs, cause **** that.
Linear algebra. I am mentally incapable of grasping base transforms and changes of base.
(and doing that and Diff Eq at the same time damn near killed me).
Probability. The math itself was easy, but we had a prof from MIT and she taught it the MIT way. Ho lee ****.
This is a homework solution from MIT's course page, pretty similar to what our assignments looked like.

ODEs, cause **** that.
Linear algebra. I am mentally incapable of grasping base transforms and changes of base.
(and doing that and Diff Eq at the same time damn near killed me).
Probability. The math itself was easy, but we had a prof from MIT and she taught it the MIT way. Ho lee ****.
This is a homework solution from MIT's course page, pretty similar to what our assignments looked like.

fkn LOL.
actuarial science student here. Not too sure what the most difficult thing is atm since we don't do just maths more statistics.
10-31-2017, 04:07 PM
-
#69
- PisseninMisc
- Registered User
-
- PisseninMisc
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Age: 40
- Posts: 16,596
- Rep Power: 141961
-
-
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
Translation: we just all make up different ways to claim we solved a problem, but the problem was made up by another mathematician who copied the numbers used in that problem from some fukin egyptian guy who made up the numbers.This is complete bullchit. Yeah, you need to follow the rules of inference. However, math has this issue which involves combinatorially explosive numbers of possible ways to approach a logical proof. So, yes, there are only a few rules to follow, but the number of possibilities becomes absurdly large. You require genuine creativity and intelligence to cleverly narrow down the possible approaches to proving some statement. Many mathematicians struggle to prove conjectures whose ramifications even are poorly understood. These people are literally expanding the boundaries of human knowledge of math. There is no simple algorithm they can follow to make progress in their research. It requires a great deal of intelligence and creativity to make progress there.
A house of cards, built one lie at a time, and you choose to prepetuate the cycle? Where does it end? Come on bro I expected more.
*** Dawn Patrol Crew ***
Rustle me = get repped
10-31-2017, 04:10 PM
-
#70
- gbSyn
- certified phaggot
-
- gbSyn
- certified phaggot
- Join Date: Oct 2010
- Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
- Posts: 1,495
- Rep Power: 4596
-
-
3rd yr civil eng checking in
I don't necessarily find any of the math hard, you slowly build up over the years and it's just a thing you do. With that being said, once math got into 3 dimensions it got a lil tough to wrap the head around what was going on. Although, a lot of the math I'm doing right now isn't hard per se .. you're given like 10 pages of formula sheets and it's just picking out the formula you need and then next question, lol.
I don't necessarily find any of the math hard, you slowly build up over the years and it's just a thing you do. With that being said, once math got into 3 dimensions it got a lil tough to wrap the head around what was going on. Although, a lot of the math I'm doing right now isn't hard per se .. you're given like 10 pages of formula sheets and it's just picking out the formula you need and then next question, lol.
10-31-2017, 04:10 PM
-
#71
- zknarc
- Registered User
-
- zknarc
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2016
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 16,421
- Rep Power: 44912
-
-
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
Yeah once you study it properly it just becomes almost a language most of the world cannot even begin to comprehend.Sometimes my mind is blown at how little most of the world understands any of the math developed in the last 250 years...I guess it is like when Chad sees people like me struggling to get laid, and it just doesn't make sense to him how such a simple, natural thing for him is so hard for everyone else.
If you can't handle me when I'm incel, you don't deserve me when I'm chad
10-31-2017, 04:10 PM
-
#72
Originally Posted By PisseninMisc⏩
what is your solution then?Translation: we just all make up different ways to claim we solved a problem, but the problem was made up by another mathematician who copied the numbers used in that problem from some fukin egyptian guy who made up the numbers.
A house of cards, built one lie at a time, and you choose to prepetuate the cycle? Where does it end? Come on bro I expected more.
A house of cards, built one lie at a time, and you choose to prepetuate the cycle? Where does it end? Come on bro I expected more.
MS, Computer Science
Feel free to PM me CS questions
10-31-2017, 04:11 PM
-
#73
Originally Posted By PisseninMisc⏩
u cant be srs bro lolTranslation: we just all make up different ways to claim we solved a problem, but the problem was made up by another mathematician who copied the numbers used in that problem from some fukin egyptian guy who made up the numbers.
A house of cards, built one lie at a time, and you choose to prepetuate the cycle? Where does it end? Come on bro I expected more.
A house of cards, built one lie at a time, and you choose to prepetuate the cycle? Where does it end? Come on bro I expected more.
math has been building exponentially...the ancient egyptians had no notion of even the most basic ideas required to attack research problems in algebraic geometry for example...
there is nobody to copy from...you know how all cucks copy their hw from some dude? At some point some brah had to be smart enough to actually do it. Physicists apply their models, but really it was some smart dude who worked out all the details behind the scenes. Yeah those guys are the mathematicians. They really are the smartest people on the planet, and the buck stops with them.
10-31-2017, 04:12 PM
-
#74
- ecs33
- Registered User
-
- ecs33
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2017
- Age: 39
- Posts: 2,907
- Rep Power: 5013
-
-
I didn't have to take beyond Calc 2, but I disliked integrals. Though I didn't do my homework or practice much during that class so maybe it would have been easier if I worked at it. Differentials I thought were pretty easy.
10-31-2017, 04:13 PM
-
#75
- ecs33
- Registered User
-
- ecs33
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2017
- Age: 39
- Posts: 2,907
- Rep Power: 5013
-
-
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
My mother is one such person..spent the last 20-30 years of her life developing quasi least squares regression at Upennu cant be srs bro lol
math has been building exponentially...the ancient egyptians had no notion of even the most basic ideas required to attack research problems in algebraic geometry for example...
there is nobody to copy from...you know how all cucks copy their hw from some dude? Physicists apply their models, but really it was some smart dude who worked out all the details behind the scenes? Yeah those guys are the mathematicians. They really are the smartest people on the planet, and the buck stops with them.
math has been building exponentially...the ancient egyptians had no notion of even the most basic ideas required to attack research problems in algebraic geometry for example...
there is nobody to copy from...you know how all cucks copy their hw from some dude? Physicists apply their models, but really it was some smart dude who worked out all the details behind the scenes? Yeah those guys are the mathematicians. They really are the smartest people on the planet, and the buck stops with them.
10-31-2017, 04:14 PM
-
#76
- shesprints
- sadly, life is a marathon
-
- shesprints
- sadly, life is a marathon
- Join Date: May 2013
- Location: New York, New York, United States
- Posts: 11,977
- Rep Power: 105899
-
-
Originally Posted By ecs33⏩
Integrals are just backwards differentials, you're just finding the area under the curve... more intuitive, not less, for most of my students.I didn't have to take beyond Calc 2, but I disliked integrals. Though I didn't do my homework or practice much during that class so maybe it would have been easier if I worked at it. Differentials I thought were pretty easy.
Originally Posted By ecs33⏩
That's so cool!My mother is one such person..spent the last 20-30 years of her life developing quasi least squares regression at Upenn
"The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously."
--Hubert Humphrey
Training Log: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=170707741&p=1427864821#post1427864821
10-31-2017, 04:27 PM
-
#77
- zknarc
- Registered User
-
- zknarc
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2016
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 16,421
- Rep Power: 44912
-
-
Originally Posted By StrawHat94⏩
Everyone in eng thinks the same. Some guy decides to invent something where you can just turn something chit into something simple, play away then untransform it and win.Probably Laplace transform didn't find it difficult per say, just weird
If you can't handle me when I'm incel, you don't deserve me when I'm chad
10-31-2017, 04:30 PM
-
#78
- PisseninMisc
- Registered User
-
- PisseninMisc
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Age: 40
- Posts: 16,596
- Rep Power: 141961
-
-
Originally Posted By bartosh⏩
We can task the global community to come together (maybe at the UN?) to come up with a modern mathematical system suited for the 21st century. Enough of living in the past. For all you know we don't even need as many numbers and equations as people in the 19th century did since computers have advanced enough to do most of the work for us.what is your solution then?
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
Pretty sure egyptians knew about algebra and geometry or else how would they build those pyramids?u cant be srs bro lol
math has been building exponentially...the ancient egyptians had no notion of even the most basic ideas required to attack research problems in algebraic geometry for example...
there is nobody to copy from...you know how all cucks copy their hw from some dude? At some point some brah had to be smart enough to actually do it. Physicists apply their models, but really it was some smart dude who worked out all the details behind the scenes. Yeah those guys are the mathematicians. They really are the smartest people on the planet, and the buck stops with them.
math has been building exponentially...the ancient egyptians had no notion of even the most basic ideas required to attack research problems in algebraic geometry for example...
there is nobody to copy from...you know how all cucks copy their hw from some dude? At some point some brah had to be smart enough to actually do it. Physicists apply their models, but really it was some smart dude who worked out all the details behind the scenes. Yeah those guys are the mathematicians. They really are the smartest people on the planet, and the buck stops with them.
I'm not saying knowledge isn't accumulative or incremental, but what I'm saying is maybe if we stopped copying all these math (which was made up anyway) from those ancients maybe we would focus more on larger increments of advancement instead of this snail pace we're on at the moment.
Your bring up the example of physicist working on models which are mathematical by it's nature, but again those maths came from the same numbers which were made up by the last guy who copied them, so really it's not being very honest with the physicists is it? A lot of assumptions being made and one weak link in the chain could bring it all down.
*** Dawn Patrol Crew ***
Rustle me = get repped
10-31-2017, 04:33 PM
-
#79
10-31-2017, 04:36 PM
-
#80
- stfudonny
- Registered Bowler
-
- stfudonny
- Registered Bowler
- Join Date: Sep 2014
- Posts: 5,670
- Rep Power: 33213
-
-
Originally Posted By PisseninMisc⏩
uhhh.......yes we made up SYMBOLS to represent REAL ideas. the quantity 2 is very real. stay away from the dispensary my man.Who really cares about this mathematics stuff anyway? I have news for you: all numbers are made up.
There is really no 1 or 2 or 3. Someone at some point decided to call something 2 and something 3 and that 2 + 3 = 5. They could have just as easy defined it as 2 + 3 = 4 in which case 2 + 2 = 5 and so on.
Bottom line is this chit is all made up so why should I or anyone else care about studying it?
There is really no 1 or 2 or 3. Someone at some point decided to call something 2 and something 3 and that 2 + 3 = 5. They could have just as easy defined it as 2 + 3 = 4 in which case 2 + 2 = 5 and so on.
Bottom line is this chit is all made up so why should I or anyone else care about studying it?
O|||||||O
white supremacist
10-31-2017, 04:38 PM
-
#81
- zknarc
- Registered User
-
- zknarc
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2016
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 16,421
- Rep Power: 44912
-
-
Originally Posted By stfudonny⏩
Spent ages learning all this stupid series chit. Then my fuking differential equations turn into this chit! Legit raged.this.....god damn you fourier.
If you can't handle me when I'm incel, you don't deserve me when I'm chad
10-31-2017, 04:42 PM
-
#82
- butwhowasgains
- Neet slayer
-
- butwhowasgains
- Neet slayer
- Join Date: Dec 2015
- Location: New Zealand
- Posts: 12,680
- Rep Power: 77894
-
-
Originally Posted By shesprints⏩
Your students are lying to you srsIntegrals are just backwards differentials, you're just finding the area under the curve... more intuitive, not less, for most of my students.
I have a dream, that one day, my username will be ironic.
Chairman of the purge.
Every post by this user is made soley for the enjoyment of cia analysts.
10-31-2017, 04:42 PM
-
#83
- 4everalone
- Registered User
-
- 4everalone
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2012
- Location: Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Age: 34
- Posts: 10,980
- Rep Power: 41395
-
-
Originally Posted By 11lemon11⏩
GTFO tradie! This thread isnt meant for youWhy is Maths difficult exactly? There are rules to follow. All you need do is follow them. That's what I heard from someone with a master's degree in mathematics from Oxford. .
I thought linear algebra was hard lulz.
Follows Chestbrah's training routine crew
10-31-2017, 04:43 PM
-
#84
- PisseninMisc
- Registered User
-
- PisseninMisc
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Age: 40
- Posts: 16,596
- Rep Power: 141961
-
-
Originally Posted By stfudonny⏩
Wtf... trying to have a civil discussion here, what's with all the insults?uhhh.......yes we made up SYMBOLS to represent REAL ideas. the quantity 2 is very real. stay away from the dispensary my man.
You seem to be stuck in the past man. Symbols are useful to a degree, but they're just that... symbols. We need to streamline mathematics for the future of mankind instead of getting stuck on talking about if 2 is really 2 or if it could be 3 or if 2 + 2 = 5 or whatever.
*** Dawn Patrol Crew ***
Rustle me = get repped
10-31-2017, 04:49 PM
-
#85
- butwhowasgains
- Neet slayer
-
- butwhowasgains
- Neet slayer
- Join Date: Dec 2015
- Location: New Zealand
- Posts: 12,680
- Rep Power: 77894
-
-
Originally Posted By PisseninMisc⏩
I think ur onto somethingBut if the guy who assigned numbers called it 3 we would all be talking about 3 titties not 2. Don't you think it's kind of archaic to teach our kids these symbols that were made up by a bunch of ancient dumbasses hundreds of years ago?
when i draw a 2, it can only fit one titty

but when i draw a 3 it can fit two

so 2 titties should be 3 titties
I have a dream, that one day, my username will be ironic.
Chairman of the purge.
Every post by this user is made soley for the enjoyment of cia analysts.
10-31-2017, 04:49 PM
-
#86
- shesprints
- sadly, life is a marathon
-
- shesprints
- sadly, life is a marathon
- Join Date: May 2013
- Location: New York, New York, United States
- Posts: 11,977
- Rep Power: 105899
-
-
Originally Posted By butwhowasgains⏩
oh noesYour students are lying to you srs
Actually my students are awesome. One of them awared me on the names of the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth derivatives of acceleration: jerk, jounce, snap, crackle, pop. Very cute.
"The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously."
--Hubert Humphrey
Training Log: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=170707741&p=1427864821#post1427864821
10-31-2017, 04:53 PM
-
#87
- butwhowasgains
- Neet slayer
-
- butwhowasgains
- Neet slayer
- Join Date: Dec 2015
- Location: New Zealand
- Posts: 12,680
- Rep Power: 77894
-
-
Originally Posted By shesprints⏩
How is that not common knowledge?oh noes
Actually my students are awesome. One of them awared me on the names of the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth derivatives of acceleration: jerk, jounce, snap, crackle, pop. Very cute.
Actually my students are awesome. One of them awared me on the names of the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth derivatives of acceleration: jerk, jounce, snap, crackle, pop. Very cute.
I have a dream, that one day, my username will be ironic.
Chairman of the purge.
Every post by this user is made soley for the enjoyment of cia analysts.
10-31-2017, 04:53 PM
-
#88
- PisseninMisc
- Registered User
-
- PisseninMisc
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Age: 40
- Posts: 16,596
- Rep Power: 141961
-
-
Originally Posted By butwhowasgains⏩
Dassit. Plus it's pretty obvious that 1 tittie on #2 is fake anyway cause, well... I'll try to explain it using a visual aide:I think ur onto something
when i draw a 2, it can only fit one titty

but when i draw a 3 it can fit two

so 2 titties should be 3 titties
when i draw a 2, it can only fit one titty

but when i draw a 3 it can fit two

so 2 titties should be 3 titties

*** Dawn Patrol Crew ***
Rustle me = get repped
10-31-2017, 04:53 PM
-
#89
- faxanadu
- Registered User
-
- faxanadu
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2009
- Location: Texas, United States
- Posts: 13,123
- Rep Power: 54413
-
-
Math is brutal if you have a chitty teacher. I swear when i was going through school...
Good teacher = Ace any test without trying
Bad teacher = Da fuk is going on
It's one of those things that if the teacher doesn't show the steps in a well thought out order ... or if you fall asleep and miss an important step ... it can screw you for the rest of the class. I remember moving Junior year in high school and they completely skipped trigonometry on me and tossed me into calculus ... dear lord i was so lost.
Good teacher = Ace any test without trying
Bad teacher = Da fuk is going on
It's one of those things that if the teacher doesn't show the steps in a well thought out order ... or if you fall asleep and miss an important step ... it can screw you for the rest of the class. I remember moving Junior year in high school and they completely skipped trigonometry on me and tossed me into calculus ... dear lord i was so lost.
"There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle." -Gym Jones
"The soul becomes dyed with the color of its thoughts." - Marcus Aurelius
?start=(#seconds)
TAMU Corps
Skydiving
Great Divide Mountain Bike Route (Jasper AB to Juarez MX) 2014
Appalachian Trail 2013
10-31-2017, 04:56 PM
-
#90
- shesprints
- sadly, life is a marathon
-
- shesprints
- sadly, life is a marathon
- Join Date: May 2013
- Location: New York, New York, United States
- Posts: 11,977
- Rep Power: 105899
-
-
Originally Posted By butwhowasgains⏩
I don't know, but I studied physics up through quantum mechanics and relativity and somehow never learned the terms.How is that not common knowledge?
*ashamed*
"The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously."
--Hubert Humphrey
Training Log: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=170707741&p=1427864821#post1427864821
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts