even if NASA faked everything that doesn't mean the Earth is flat you fuking potato
NASA was established in 1958, the earth being round has been considered a scientific fact since the Ancient Greeks
or were Plato and Aristotle also freemason zionists in on the conspiracy?

No I even acknowledged that in my original post you brainwashed globe-tard idiot. My exact point was that on a zero gravity plane nobody's hair sticks straight up and stiff like Medusa's, it moves around all over the place. If you can't see that the so-called astronaut lady has permed hair with hairspray in it then you're brainwashed.

You you don't have anything to say to this ^^^ do you?

It effects my life because the same people keeping the space hoax going are the ones who orchestrated 9/11 and killed 3,000 civilians to justify their Middle East wars. Not to mention their control of the international banking system which effects my life as well.

space is NOT real

OP how many people at NASA do you think are in on this "we are faking everything"? is it only the higher ups and the astronauts? or do the other employees know as well? if these employees don't know, there are still probably a few hundred/thousand higher ups/astronauts over the decades who would know right? and if the employees do know that increases the number much more. why hasn't there been a single legit whistleblower so far? do you also think all the other space agencies around the world are faking chit? and not a single whistleblower from any of those agencies either?

how about all the spacecraft that nasa builds and then launches? what happens to those spacecraft? they just magically disappear? and then all the astronauts and equipment on the rockets sent up to the ISS? what happens to those rockets? the astronauts just disappear for a few months/years?

do you think the ISS is real? why don't you use a telescope to have a look at it?

and i've seen you continuously tie in NASA faking eveything as proof that the earth is flat. those two things don't fit together m8. NASA could be lying, but that doesn't mean the earth is flat

these are srs questions, just wanna understand your thought process.

A program allowing civilians to visit space would immediately dispel all doubts about the earth being round, you're right. However, isn't it funny how every time plans for space tourism are announced they never come to fruition and are forgotten about? Pretty sure Richard Branson announced plans for civilians flights into space over a decade ago, but then cancelled the program because he said space is "too hard".

Round like what?

A CD, a coin, a bottle lid? Atleast get your language straight, thoughtless zombie.

The rockets you see launched never go into space, but instead land in water. That's why all launch sites are located right next to the ocean (Cape Canaveral in Florida for example). In fact, if you watch a rocket launch yourself you'll see that they don't go straight up, but instead have a flight path in the shape of a parabola.

Do these paths look like they're going into space to you?

Congratulations, you're in the first steps of waking up to flat earth. Just a warning though, once you go flat you never go back. It was only a few months ago that I thought flat earthers were all crackheads or religion nuts until I started seriously looking into it.

age:25
nice semantics
round like the "roundies" you retards call anyone with a basic understanding of highschool trigonemetry

His actual words:'Space flight is hard -- but worth it'
https://www.cnet.com/news/branson-on...-but-worth-it/

Wow, you're so wrapped up in lies and delusion, you just expect people to blindly believe whatever you say, huh?

His actual company, working towards private space flight:
https://www.virgingalactic.comSo, everyone with an amateur telescope who watches the ISS pass by is lying about it?

http://iss.astroviewer.net/observation.php

You're right that a conspiracy would include a lot of people worldwide, but keep in mind that everything coming from space agencies is a downward flow of information thus only the people at the top would know about it. You talk about other countries' space programs. NASA is actually the most sophisticated worldwide at faking space. Other countries, especially Asian ones, are so bad at creating fake footage and images that it's comical.

This is a real picture from the moon's surface, released by the Japanese space agency JAXA. Does this look real to you?



Here's a Chinese space walk. Notice the BUBBLES throughout the entire thing, especially at 3:02. It's being filmed in an underwater pool like all space walks.





The entire concept of space walks makes no sense to begin with. Why would they design craft which requires astronauts to take the insane risk by going outside into the vacuum of space to conduct repairs and maintenance?

Watch, in your lifetime space tourism will NEVER HAPPEN. They'll keep making excuses for postponements because it's not possible.

As for seeing the ISS, what you see is a moving light in the sky. You're the one making the leap of faith that the moving light is an international space station. See how little evidence is required to fool people when they're pre-programmed?

i guess i'm the only one that sees him hook the guy's pocket with his pinky/ring finger instead of "grabbing a wire"

So you're telling me that NASA is part of a vast conspiracy using state of the art techniques to fake evidence of the earth being round, but yet can't hide wires in a video?

Have you ever seen a movie? Pretty sure they could get any film student to hide wires successfully if they needed to for a reason, like if they were 'faking' being in space.

Another claim that makes no sense - what about all the presumably fake astronauts? All the peopleactually producingwhat you claim are endlessly fake videos? And the facilities you believe are housing them and their staged operations? Plus the spacecraft that supposedly just splash into the ocean... except when the capsules & people manage to return to earth in another spectacularly staged & fake event... That's a hell of a lot of work for just a handful of senior administrators to be doing all on their own

It's a live interview. The point is that the vast majority of the time everything goes smoothly, but every once in a while they mess up especially when doing live interviews.

I really don't think you understood the point. Of course the wires are hidden with video editing techniques, green screen most likely involved as well. However in the video you can see the EFFECTS of the wires, the man next to him grabs nothing mid-air and then you see a tugging motion on the other guy's trousers. It was done to stabilize him since his wires were malfunctioning after his little flip gimmick.

[QUOTE=dusky99 post_id=1537086621]The rockets you see launched never go into space, but instead land in water. That's why all launch sites are located right next to the ocean (Cape Canaveral in Florida for example). In fact, if you watch a rocket launch yourself you'll see that they don't go straight up, but instead have a flight path in the shape of a parabola.

Do these paths look like they're going into space to you?

[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CpVitF5WcAAoFXq.jpg[/mg][/QUOTE]they aren't supposed to go straight up, that wouldn't work, you might want to research why the trajectory is the way it is (unless you think all the science behind that is fake as well). and the launch sites are next to the ocean so that the portions that are discarded on launch fall into the ocean, and not on land...

and no one has ever seen any of the spacecraft land in the water when spacecraft is launched so often? lol just lol. when the spacecraft returns to earth, thats just CGI right? all the people producing the fake films are in on this too right?

and there have been a number of space tourists already

[QUOTE=dusky99 post_id=1537087661]Watch, in your lifetime space tourism will NEVER HAPPEN. They'll keep making excuses for postponements because it's not possible.

As for seeing the ISS, what you see is a moving light in the sky. You're the one making the leap of faith that the moving light is an international space station. See how little evidence is required to fool people when they're pre-programmed?[/QUOTE]so you don't think satellites exist either correct? all the companies are in on this hoax too right? you're either a troll or stupid

This is why I misc.

Of course NASA have the technology, there's just no point going back at the moment. It would costs another 150billion dollars.

We will go back though, there's so a massive amount of rare resources that we need and the moon contains them all.

Nice deflection after you were caught lying...BRB, just a moving light...

From Germany, Mar 2016
https://www.cnet.com/news/spectacula...m-a-back-yard/



Mar 2009
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/ba...rom-the-ground



Taken in England, Feb 2011
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/ba.../#.Wi19pbaZNrw

The companies which produce satellites may not be in on the hoax, but they never need to receive any verification that their products end up in space orbiting the earth. Try to imagine how satellites function in the thermosphere, where temperatures supposedly reach 2,000 degrees celsius which is hotter than the melting point of many of their parts. Try to find a single non-photoshopped picture of a satellite in space. Try to find a video of a satellite being shot off ten times faster than a speeding bullet into orbit. It's ridiculous when you really thinking about it, science-fiction.

it's like, "how to waste your time arguing with a troll 101"

yeah NASA is full of chit. I don't think the Earth is flat but if you believe any of their "live videos" and pictures are real you're a moron.

Even the RHCP warned us about it back in 2009



"space may be the final frontier but it's made in a Hollywood basement" WAKE UP SHEEPLE!

Just visited the guy's Twitter account, he claims to be an amateur but is supposedly taking pictures like this (his pics below). These are the photoshopped images we're all brainwashed to believe are real. He's another disinfo agent.

Search the internet and you'll find countless telescope owners complaining about why they can't see nebulae and galaxies through their telescope. Because the pictures are photoshopped.

why can't people just ignore flat earthers? they couldn't be any more irrelevant. yea, their idiocy is annoying but it's better to just laugh and move on.

So, you suggest they fake zero gravity, space, and a round earth, but don't fake live interviews now?

How do you know its live, because they told you, or did you physically watch both the interviewers and interviewees?

Where did I say they don't fake live interviews? If they're using a combination of harnesses, wires, green screen, CGI and other techniques during live interviews then that counts as fake.

Then how are those satellites working and communicating if they're not in orbit? The "verification" is that they're working and providing/relaying data, exactly as designed for orbiting in space around a spherical planet.