Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» GOP unveils final $1.5T tax plan
  1. Results 151 to 180 of 200
  2. First
  3. 4
  4. 5
  5. 6
  6. 7
  7. Last
post 1537847531 12-18-2017, 06:09 AM
-
#151
  1. xxdef1antxx
  2. Registered User
  1. xxdef1antxx
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2014
  4. Location: Buffalo, New York, United States
  5. Posts: 1,576
  6. Rep Power: 14884
Originally Posted By NitrogenWidget
I live in a chitty city 25 miles from Buffalo.
My home is assessed at 89k.
would be lucky to find some sucker to give me 70k in this neighborhood.
My property taxes were almost 4k last yr.
even with income tax added in i'm still a a little bit away from hitting the 10k limit.

going by what i earn, if I hit a point where i earn enough to go past the 10k limit I don't think i'd mind all that much if i'm still in my same house because i'll be making what would be considered a good living in my area.

I see why schumer is against this, all his rich friends with multiple properties can't claim as much on taxes.
However, people with family cottages on lakes and such are going to get raped since our property tax is just out of control.
25 Miles from Buffalo? Which way? Im 25 miles north in chitty lockport.
post 1537848861 12-18-2017, 06:36 AM
-
#152
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
  5. Posts: 66,936
  6. Rep Power: 214514
Originally Posted By x-trainer
John McCain returning home to AZ, and will miss the vote.
Can they not vote remotely? This is the current year after all.
*PUREBLOOD CREW*
*DAD CREW*
*SUPER STRAIGHT*
*NATURAL DICK CREW*
*CCW*
post 1537849701 12-18-2017, 06:49 AM
-
#153
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 62,386
  6. Rep Power: 451180
Originally Posted By JoshSP1985
Can they not vote remotely? This is the current year after all.
Maybe he is in really bad condition?
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
post 1537852331 12-18-2017, 07:37 AM
-
#154
  1. Ten_Hearts
  2. Registered User
  1. Ten_Hearts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 2,986
  6. Rep Power: 12063
Originally Posted By JoshSP1985
Can they not vote remotely? This is the current year after all.
I believe the rules are you have to be present or its recorded as a missed vote. Him missing the vote is an issue if 2 republicans vote against because youll have a 50/49 split instead of a 50/50 split with the Vice President breaking the tie.
_____________

__________
post 1537852621 12-18-2017, 07:42 AM
-
#155
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
  5. Posts: 66,936
  6. Rep Power: 214514
Originally Posted By Ten_Hearts
I believe the rules are you have to be present or its recorded as a missed vote. Him missing the vote is an issue if 2 republicans vote against because youll have a 50/49 split instead of a 50/50 split with the Vice President breaking the tie.
Dammit John!

He really should step down and focused on his health/family though and it should have happened the same day he was diagnosed. I guess either scenario was likely going to cause a missed vote though.
*PUREBLOOD CREW*
*DAD CREW*
*SUPER STRAIGHT*
*NATURAL DICK CREW*
*CCW*
post 1537852871 12-18-2017, 07:46 AM
-
#156
  1. Seatard
  1. Seatard
  2. Join Date: Sep 2012
  3. Posts: 19,154
  4. Subscribers: 3
  5. Rep Power: 98572
Originally Posted By Ephedra
Of course people "more well off" own businesses. But a business getting a tax cut can now hire and give raises to veteran employees. For my company, we plan to hire 20+ entry level workers in manufacturing as well as three 40k-60k sales and marketing office employees. It's a snowball effect that helps ALL people.

And we're just a "smaller" family owned business with 125 employees. I imagine the larger corporations have greater expansion plans.

Don't believe the liberal talking point that the extra money businesses receive from tax cuts just gets shoved into Dr. Evil's pockets.
You have demand for your products/services that requires an increase in your staffing level by ~20% but have not already done so because of taxes?

As a business owner myself, if tax cuts amount to anything, it will most likely be saved for rainy days or used to purchase new equipment.
post 1537853821 12-18-2017, 08:02 AM
-
#157
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
  5. Posts: 66,936
  6. Rep Power: 214514
When my company has a good year they just do additional distributions into employee ESOP or 401ks, "rather give it to employees than pay taxes on it".

Employee owned private company with 300~ employees

We do sometimes have OT freezes and run a little light in some positions so I'm going to assume we'll make a few hires if this tax plan goes through.
*PUREBLOOD CREW*
*DAD CREW*
*SUPER STRAIGHT*
*NATURAL DICK CREW*
*CCW*
post 1537856241 12-18-2017, 08:30 AM
-
#158
  1. QuitYourCrying
  2. Registered User
  1. QuitYourCrying
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Posts: 3,531
  5. Rep Power: 10765
Originally Posted By Seatard
As a business owner myself, if tax cuts amount to anything, it will most likely be saved for rainy days or used to purchase new equipment.
You must not be in a very competitive industry or environment if that is the case. Lucky you.
post 1537857171 12-18-2017, 08:42 AM
-
#159
  1. ichBinBerliner
  2. Banned
  1. ichBinBerliner
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2010
  4. Posts: 3,652
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By ceizer1985
The tax bill isn't that bad but stuff like this is ridiculous.

BREAKING: Sen. @JohnCornyn tells @ThisWeekABC that last-minute provision enriching @SenBobCorker & other GOP lawmakers was added to the tax bill as part of an effort to “cobble together the votes we needed to get this bill passed”https://t.co/5spNBNb8Vl
Bob Corker also declared he has not even read the tax bill he announced he is voting for.
Im not surprised. almost nobody ITT has read it either. lol
post 1537857571 12-18-2017, 08:47 AM
-
#160
  1. ichBinBerliner
  2. Banned
  1. ichBinBerliner
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2010
  4. Posts: 3,652
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Ephedra
Of course people "more well off" own businesses. But a business getting a tax cut can now hire and give raises to veteran employees. For my company, we plan to hire 20+ entry level workers in manufacturing as well as three 40k-60k sales and marketing office employees. It's a snowball effect that helps ALL people.

And we're just a "smaller" family owned business with 125 employees. I imagine the larger corporations have greater expansion plans.

Don't believe the liberal talking point that the extra money businesses receive from tax cuts just gets shoved into Dr. Evil's pockets.
let me get this straight.....your company cannot meet demand for a product and has withheld expansion and hiring because of the current tax structure?
post 1537858271 12-18-2017, 08:56 AM
-
#161
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
  5. Posts: 66,936
  6. Rep Power: 214514
How many people voting on it do you think have read it? Less than 5? 1-2?

I'm pretty sure most people read the cliff notes and I would also assume most congressmen and a vast majority of senators wouldn't even understand what they're reading.
*PUREBLOOD CREW*
*DAD CREW*
*SUPER STRAIGHT*
*NATURAL DICK CREW*
*CCW*
post 1537858991 12-18-2017, 09:06 AM
-
#162
  1. Seatard
  1. Seatard
  2. Join Date: Sep 2012
  3. Posts: 19,154
  4. Subscribers: 3
  5. Rep Power: 98572
Originally Posted By QuitYourCrying
You must not be in a very competitive industry or environment if that is the case. Lucky you.
Top employees in any industry know what they are worth and know they can work somewhere else if they feel the are getting screwed over.

I don't know what that has to do with corporate tax reduction though. A company would pay 0% tax if they paid every available dollar to their employees.
post 1537861621 12-18-2017, 09:36 AM
-
#163
  1. Jaroctor
  2. Vibram Glove Guy
  1. Jaroctor
  2. Vibram Glove Guy
  3. Join Date: Aug 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 12,609
  6. Rep Power: 26150
Originally Posted By tng83
It's cute how libs pretend to give a **** about deficits all of a sudden.
Wasn't it your job to give a **** about them?

Cute how you've changed your mind
post 1537862751 12-18-2017, 09:52 AM
-
#164
  1. Ten_Hearts
  2. Registered User
  1. Ten_Hearts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 2,986
  6. Rep Power: 12063
Originally Posted By Seatard
Top employees in any industry know what they are worth and know they can work somewhere else if they feel the are getting screwed over.

I don't know what that has to do with corporate tax reduction though. A company would pay 0% tax if they paid every available dollar to their employees.
Depends...anti-poaching deals seems to be a big issue in silicone valley right now. There was the big one in 2010/2013 with Apple Google Intel Adobe. And there is another ongoing one with LG and Samsung. Its probably more common than we would like to admit even though it is illegal.

edit:

Also Disney/sony/dreamworks antipoaching case was settled earlier this year.
_____________

__________
post 1537862881 12-18-2017, 09:54 AM
-
#165
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
  5. Posts: 66,936
  6. Rep Power: 214514
Originally Posted By Ten_Hearts
Depends...anti-poaching deals seems to be a big issue in silicone valley right now. There was the big one in 2010/2013 with Apple Google Intel Adobe. And there is another ongoing one with LG and Samsung. Its probably more common than we would like to admit even though it is illegal.
Poaching as in head hunting is illegal?
*PUREBLOOD CREW*
*DAD CREW*
*SUPER STRAIGHT*
*NATURAL DICK CREW*
*CCW*
post 1537864071 12-18-2017, 10:07 AM
-
#166
  1. Ten_Hearts
  2. Registered User
  1. Ten_Hearts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 2,986
  6. Rep Power: 12063
Originally Posted By JoshSP1985
Poaching as in head hunting is illegal?
Anti-poaching agreements. Basically all those companies got together and said they wouldn't hire employees from each others companies, limiting employment options and suppressing wages. I believe it violates anti-trust laws specifically.
_____________

__________
post 1537865131 12-18-2017, 10:18 AM
-
#167
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
  5. Posts: 66,936
  6. Rep Power: 214514
Originally Posted By Ten_Hearts
Anti-poaching agreements. Basically all those companies got together and said they wouldn't hire employees from each others companies, limiting employment options and suppressing wages. I believe it violates anti-trust laws specifically.
Oh I see didn't realize it was companies making agreements with other companies. That's playing in the same ballpark as price fixing.
*PUREBLOOD CREW*
*DAD CREW*
*SUPER STRAIGHT*
*NATURAL DICK CREW*
*CCW*
post 1537866671 12-18-2017, 10:34 AM
-
#168
  1. Tyler2106
  2. Registered User
  1. Tyler2106
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 11,113
  7. Rep Power: 51809
I'm late to the party on this thread, but from what I'm understand, the GOP tax plan benefits me by: lowering the tax bracket I'm in, increases standard deduction, gives me more tax credits for having kids, no mandate for health insurance (this doesn't apply to me, but is nice to see), and helps my LLC out with lower tax rates.

All I've been reading about this bill is that it's a tax relief for the rich and hurts everyone else. If this is hurting me then I'm fine with it.
New England Patriot
MISC Dynasty League Champion 2018
post 1537866911 12-18-2017, 10:36 AM
-
#169
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
  5. Posts: 66,936
  6. Rep Power: 214514
Originally Posted By Tyler2106
I'm late to the party on this thread, but from what I'm understand, the GOP tax plan benefits me by: lowering the tax bracket I'm in, increases standard deduction, gives me more tax credits for having kids, no mandate for health insurance (this doesn't apply to me, but is nice to see), and helps my LLC out with lower tax rates.

All I've been reading about this bill is that it's a tax relief for the rich and hurts everyone else. If this is hurting me then I'm fine with it.
It actually helps everyone from what I can tell with the cost of speeding up national debt accumulation.

Actually it may cost some wealthy people in high tax states a little more.
*PUREBLOOD CREW*
*DAD CREW*
*SUPER STRAIGHT*
*NATURAL DICK CREW*
*CCW*
post 1537871931 12-18-2017, 11:29 AM
-
#170
  1. backinbusiness
  2. Pronoun: Phaggot/Genius
  1. backinbusiness
  2. Pronoun: Phaggot/Genius
  3. Join Date: May 2007
  4. Location: Arizona, United States
  5. Posts: 16,075
  6. Rep Power: 62954
So let em get this straight — it’s literally more money in every bodies pockets unless you make $20k a year working at McDonalds...in which you have a tax benefit anyway.

Don’t see what’s not to like about this?

Or is it the leftists believe that there should be MORE tax benefits on top of the zero taxes they pay to the poor if the middle to upper class pay less?
Misc Firearm Crew. 2nd Amendment cannot be Interpreted.
The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
2023 Goal: Continue triggering leftist R&P deranged posters and incels.
Never relax around joggers
post 1537873651 12-18-2017, 11:44 AM
-
#171
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
  5. Posts: 66,936
  6. Rep Power: 214514
Originally Posted By backinbusiness
So let em get this straight — it’s literally more money in every bodies pockets unless you make $20k a year working at McDonalds...in which you have a tax benefit anyway.

Don’t see what’s not to like about this?

Or is it the leftists believe that there should be MORE tax benefits on top of the zero taxes they pay to the poor if the middle to upper class pay less?
The left won't be happy unless the tax plan is if you make more than 100k a year you give 50% of your income to the poor.

Edit: Actually more like the government takes 50% of your income if you make more than 100k and the distributes it to left approved social programs.
*PUREBLOOD CREW*
*DAD CREW*
*SUPER STRAIGHT*
*NATURAL DICK CREW*
*CCW*
post 1537874591 12-18-2017, 11:49 AM
-
#172
  1. wesleysh21
  2. Registered User
  1. wesleysh21
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2006
  4. Location: South Carolina, United States
  5. Age: 47
  6. Posts: 19,701
  7. Rep Power: 161302
Originally Posted By ichBinBerliner
Im not surprised. almost nobody ITT has read it either. lol
Its weird that Corker flipped his vote to yes.
ALL I ASK IS ALL YOU GOT FOR AS LONG AS IT TAKES
post 1537877161 12-18-2017, 12:10 PM
-
#173
  1. Ten_Hearts
  2. Registered User
  1. Ten_Hearts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 2,986
  6. Rep Power: 12063
Originally Posted By backinbusiness
So let em get this straight — it’s literally more money in every bodies pockets unless you make $20k a year working at McDonalds...in which you have a tax benefit anyway.

Don’t see what’s not to like about this?

Or is it the leftists believe that there should be MORE tax benefits on top of the zero taxes they pay to the poor if the middle to upper class pay less?
In general it is because the tax breaks for individuals are set to expire while the corporate cuts permanent. Due to the project increase to the deficit programs like medicaid and medicare will need to get cuts. So the net sum would be a loss to many individuals.

I think from my calculations with the latest tax plan I finally get about $450 back? Which honestly don't care too much about. I lose with the elimination of deductions and get back a little with revised brackets.
_____________

__________
post 1537878081 12-18-2017, 12:17 PM
-
#174
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 46,410
  7. Rep Power: 219352
Originally Posted By wesleysh21
Its weird that Corker flipped his vote to yes.
Word is Corker's playing the long game. Like Sec of State when Kelly fires Rex or even Potus to challenge Trump if he continues to suck as bad as he has or after if Trump miraculously gets elected like he did the first time.
Early AM workout crew.
Holy crap dude, Satan's huge crew.
post 1537878151 12-18-2017, 12:18 PM
-
#175
  1. wesleysh21
  2. Registered User
  1. wesleysh21
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2006
  4. Location: South Carolina, United States
  5. Age: 47
  6. Posts: 19,701
  7. Rep Power: 161302
Originally Posted By Ten_Hearts
In general it is because the tax breaks for individuals are set to expire while the corporate cuts permanent. Due to the project increase to the deficit programs like medicaid and medicare will need to get cuts. So the net sum would be a loss to many individuals.

I think from my calculations with the latest tax plan I finally get about $450 back? Which honestly don't care too much about. I lose with the elimination of deductions and get back a little with revised brackets.
And by "elimination of deductions" I assume you are talking about the $10,000 cap to SALT deductions?
ALL I ASK IS ALL YOU GOT FOR AS LONG AS IT TAKES
post 1537878321 12-18-2017, 12:19 PM
-
#176
  1. Ten_Hearts
  2. Registered User
  1. Ten_Hearts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 2,986
  6. Rep Power: 12063
Originally Posted By wesleysh21
And by "elimination of deductions" I assume you are talking about the $10,000 cap to SALT deductions?
That was factored into my calculations yes because I go over $10,000.
_____________

__________
post 1537878841 12-18-2017, 12:22 PM
-
#177
  1. wesleysh21
  2. Registered User
  1. wesleysh21
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2006
  4. Location: South Carolina, United States
  5. Age: 47
  6. Posts: 19,701
  7. Rep Power: 161302
Originally Posted By Ten_Hearts
That was factored into my calculations yes because I go over $10,000.
Okay, that's what I was asking. I've heard so many "versions" of things I just wanted to be sure I didn't miss something.
ALL I ASK IS ALL YOU GOT FOR AS LONG AS IT TAKES
post 1537879011 12-18-2017, 12:24 PM
-
#178
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 46,410
  7. Rep Power: 219352
I know you guys are waiting to hear what the impact of this will be on my taxes since I'm exactly the kind of person who should be hurt due to high income (not millionaire) and high cost of living state.
Early AM workout crew.
Holy crap dude, Satan's huge crew.
post 1537879621 12-18-2017, 12:29 PM
-
#179
  1. Ten_Hearts
  2. Registered User
  1. Ten_Hearts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 2,986
  6. Rep Power: 12063
Originally Posted By wesleysh21
Okay, that's what I was asking. I've heard so many "versions" of things I just wanted to be sure I didn't miss something.
Yea it got better for me in the most recent version. Maryland is comparatively a high tax state. Between my local and state taxes on income is close to 8% and another 4000 in property taxes. I earn about 100,000.
_____________

__________
post 1537879801 12-18-2017, 12:31 PM
-
#180
  1. wesleysh21
  2. Registered User
  1. wesleysh21
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2006
  4. Location: South Carolina, United States
  5. Age: 47
  6. Posts: 19,701
  7. Rep Power: 161302
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie
I know you guys are waiting to hear what the impact of this will be on my taxes since I'm exactly the kind of person who should be hurt due to high income (not millionaire) and high cost of living state.
I'm just glad I didn't stay in Michigan. I remember looking at house out in Holt, and a $200k house had $5k worth of property taxes. The schools were awesome, but damn. And that was in the mid-2000s. I'm not sure what it is now.
ALL I ASK IS ALL YOU GOT FOR AS LONG AS IT TAKES
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts