Forum
»
Why do 55% of white people think they're discriminated against?
12-28-2017, 10:35 AM
-
#211
- Kreuzritter
- Banned
-
- Kreuzritter
- Banned
- Join Date: May 2009
- Location: Lehigh Acres, Florida, United States
- Age: 41
- Posts: 7,684
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By TheAmazon⏩
either you cant read or openly ignore it. expected as much. your whole party relies on disinfo.ITT salon articles and fringe postings by dump people on Tumblr = discrimination.
12-28-2017, 10:38 AM
-
#212
- TheAmazon
- Registered User
-
- TheAmazon
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: Denton, Texas, United States
- Posts: 8,470
- Rep Power: 36812
-
-
Originally Posted By Kreuzritter⏩
oh great so you know my political affiliations and where I skew.either you cant read or openly ignore it. expected as much. your whole party relies on disinfo.
Check out my supplement log for Gaspari's Size On!
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=172059223
12-28-2017, 10:43 AM
-
#213
- DrDescartes
- Registered User
-
- DrDescartes
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2014
- Age: 36
- Posts: 418
- Rep Power: 352
-
-
Originally Posted By andrew28⏩
I can already see it now. "They" will say "but you took it from the Native Americans!".For a number of reasons.
Universities now have diversity officers that pride themselves on how many non-whites make up their student population and faculty.
White police officers are portrayed by the media as racist even in situations when they’re 100% in the right.
Whites used to make up 90% of the US population and now it’s at around 67%. It’ll be under 50% by 2040. Anything less than white people saying “Yayyy we’re giving our country away!!” is seen as racist.
We have illegal aliens from Mexico pouring across the border, taking up jobs, resources, government aid, etc. that’s taxpayer money that was meant to help OUR OWN poor, sick, and homeless. You can’t have a welfare state and open borders. This country will become majority Latino within the century. And we’re not allowed to question it on any level.
It’s in every race’s tribal nature to gravitate and be comfortable around similar people. Why should any group not be allowed to pursue their destiny without the unwanted embrace of people unlike themselves?
This is being forced on us and we never had a say in it. Which country out there do you think you could convince the majority race to willingly give up their majority status to someone else?
Universities now have diversity officers that pride themselves on how many non-whites make up their student population and faculty.
White police officers are portrayed by the media as racist even in situations when they’re 100% in the right.
Whites used to make up 90% of the US population and now it’s at around 67%. It’ll be under 50% by 2040. Anything less than white people saying “Yayyy we’re giving our country away!!” is seen as racist.
We have illegal aliens from Mexico pouring across the border, taking up jobs, resources, government aid, etc. that’s taxpayer money that was meant to help OUR OWN poor, sick, and homeless. You can’t have a welfare state and open borders. This country will become majority Latino within the century. And we’re not allowed to question it on any level.
It’s in every race’s tribal nature to gravitate and be comfortable around similar people. Why should any group not be allowed to pursue their destiny without the unwanted embrace of people unlike themselves?
This is being forced on us and we never had a say in it. Which country out there do you think you could convince the majority race to willingly give up their majority status to someone else?
Well,wedidn't. But yes. Our ancestors did.
I recently saw where it was questioned as to whether or not any modern country exists which hasn't conquered someone else along the way to where they are now. I never did see a good answer. "We" conquered this land for ourselves. Right or wrong, it's ours now.
Frankly I'm okay with being selfish in order to keep it.
Pharmacy Crew
12-28-2017, 10:44 AM
-
#214
- Kreuzritter
- Banned
-
- Kreuzritter
- Banned
- Join Date: May 2009
- Location: Lehigh Acres, Florida, United States
- Age: 41
- Posts: 7,684
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By TheAmazon⏩
i at least cited examples of how you were wrong before you even said anything. sorry but something doesnt exist because YOU dont like it.oh great so you know my political affiliations and where I skew.
12-28-2017, 10:45 AM
-
#215
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By FitnessJake⏩
Well, straight, while males are blamed for everything.Because we are? Every media piece blames white people for everything. Just go read any comment on Twitter about anything, and somehow people will bring up white people as the problem.
12-28-2017, 10:46 AM
-
#216
- Better Unborn
- ♔ King Rotter ♔
-
- Better Unborn
- ♔ King Rotter ♔
- Join Date: Aug 2003
- Location: United States
- Posts: 26,485
- Rep Power: 181877
-
-
Originally Posted By TheAmazon⏩
I'd agree if this chit wasn't already leaking heavily into RL.ITT salon articles and fringe postings by dump people on Tumblr = discrimination.
(__Y__) Misc Buck Breaker (__Y__)
( o Y o ) Milk Wagon Engineer ( o Y o )
~@( Official Youthful Glow Connoisseur )@~
12-28-2017, 10:50 AM
-
#217
- Maestro
- отличнo!
-
- Maestro
- отличнo!
- Join Date: Oct 2002
- Location: New Mexico, United States
- Posts: 58,400
- Rep Power: 203698
-
-
Originally Posted By EoR⏩
Most of the more blatant "discrimination" against whites is a fairly new phenomena, about 10-15 years (which is not much at all with respect to the course of human history)Because the landscape has been created where not only a white male is the most criticized, despised--while secretly envied--among minority groups but even where white people themselves are being told to be guilty and ashamed of themselves for events multiple generations in the past they had nothing to do with. The better question is why did white culture allow themselves to be walked all over? We all know the despicable movements responsible for this. Every group if you have any historical knowledge has blood on it's hands yet Western media only remind everyone of what white people did. For example, most idiot humans think slavery is just something white people did to Africans awhile ago, just the mentioning of slavery will ignite that one part in history - yet these idiots don't even know as we speak a lot of the world is still practicing slavery.
There's still this idea that being white is an automatic win in life yet mainstream media and laws do everything to give every other group a step-up regardless if they worked for it or not. Even when groups have no discrimination from anyone that matters, FULL support of their government and preferential treatment they will still blame white people/racism when their life is ****. No discipline and responsibility, so find a scapegoat and what better than the over-worn racial reason? White guilt is so nonsensical, yet if you had someone declare out loud "I am proud to be white" all instant thoughts will turn to Nazi, racism, Hitler - this is how easily influenced idiots are.
White culture is expected to be flexible, to be tolerant, allowed to be held accountable in public, have to "bite their tongue" when shamed, while every other cultures and groups are praised for standing it's ground, being "proud" all while being allowed unearned concessions. No, the race debate is the biggest mirage of facts and reality - contradictions and hypocrisy at every corner. Nothing will solve it until we get into the age of androids and avatars, that's why I try to not become too emotionally invested in debates.
Western culture has eliminated all the main inhumane practices, while the rest of world still has them but yet they are still having historical events hung over their head. Why? For power, for leverage, victimhood, exuscatory mindset. Just like a stupid parent blaming a test being too hard and that it's not their child's fault for not studying/being smart enough. You see this with feminism, where there is NO need for it in a first world country yet they will try paint a picture like every male is running around raping women and telling their wives to stay in the kitchen.
Just the same with racism, it's misrepresented in all media because that is what sells. All these people fighting for "rights" and the rest of the world is going "Rights for what? No-one is fuking stopping you anymore but yourself". Besides socio-economics plays the larger role for things like racial related crimes, but no-one ever goes over that. Many groups have a bad culture that THEY are responsible for only--proven by historical evidence and raw statistics--but we're never allowed to ever mention this - it has to be someone elses fault.
TLDR: Because that's how it exactly is. Mud slinging a group that's actually the most tolerant, most giving, less racist and puts in the most effort of any other group to try remove all these social issues.
There's still this idea that being white is an automatic win in life yet mainstream media and laws do everything to give every other group a step-up regardless if they worked for it or not. Even when groups have no discrimination from anyone that matters, FULL support of their government and preferential treatment they will still blame white people/racism when their life is ****. No discipline and responsibility, so find a scapegoat and what better than the over-worn racial reason? White guilt is so nonsensical, yet if you had someone declare out loud "I am proud to be white" all instant thoughts will turn to Nazi, racism, Hitler - this is how easily influenced idiots are.
White culture is expected to be flexible, to be tolerant, allowed to be held accountable in public, have to "bite their tongue" when shamed, while every other cultures and groups are praised for standing it's ground, being "proud" all while being allowed unearned concessions. No, the race debate is the biggest mirage of facts and reality - contradictions and hypocrisy at every corner. Nothing will solve it until we get into the age of androids and avatars, that's why I try to not become too emotionally invested in debates.
Western culture has eliminated all the main inhumane practices, while the rest of world still has them but yet they are still having historical events hung over their head. Why? For power, for leverage, victimhood, exuscatory mindset. Just like a stupid parent blaming a test being too hard and that it's not their child's fault for not studying/being smart enough. You see this with feminism, where there is NO need for it in a first world country yet they will try paint a picture like every male is running around raping women and telling their wives to stay in the kitchen.
Just the same with racism, it's misrepresented in all media because that is what sells. All these people fighting for "rights" and the rest of the world is going "Rights for what? No-one is fuking stopping you anymore but yourself". Besides socio-economics plays the larger role for things like racial related crimes, but no-one ever goes over that. Many groups have a bad culture that THEY are responsible for only--proven by historical evidence and raw statistics--but we're never allowed to ever mention this - it has to be someone elses fault.
TLDR: Because that's how it exactly is. Mud slinging a group that's actually the most tolerant, most giving, less racist and puts in the most effort of any other group to try remove all these social issues.
and unfortunately there is a double standard that exists against white people due to their "historical trends of colonization". Were other races and cultures practicing raping and pillaging and slavery? Sure, but never to the point (or with the skilled precision)that whites had to become the unequivocal rulers of the free world. I'm not saying its right, but its something that ironically other white people have established as a negative aspect in white culture. When you're already on the top, its only natural to be looked at under a microscope and and scrutinized more harshly than someone lower than you doing the same thing (for example, Africans enslaving other africans).
12-28-2017, 10:51 AM
-
#218
Originally Posted By sword_⏩
You do understand black women are only 6% of the population right?Totally dude. Funny enough working in tech I have RARELY seen a black woman in the workplace. I've seen some hispanic women but the ones in sales/hr/marketing/etc are mostly white women and I know if I brush up against one of them wrong I will get it in trouble. Kinda joking but kind of serious.
Part of the reason I don't ride for issues of white / third wave feminists is because it only caters to white females that want a bigger cut of white privilege in society.
Part of the reason I don't ride for issues of white / third wave feminists is because it only caters to white females that want a bigger cut of white privilege in society.
Affirmative action may help white women more in terms of raw numbers than individual groups (blacks, Hispanics etc), however proportionally speaking, it helps out those groups more.
Anyways on to the topic at hand, some whites may feel discriminated against because:
1.There are anti white laws on the books in affirmative action, although they ultimately hurt Asians the most, whites are still the majority and will thus feel it the most
2.The CRA ended freedom of association and the rights for businesses to deny service for any reason, nowadays you have ridiculous signs like this:

That just want to say one thing, that is currently illegal.
If forced segregation is bad (government mandated), why is forced integration (government mandated) good?
3.The media is verifiably run by anti white people and the democrats (50% of the population are also the anti white party). Examples:




So to sum up:
1.There are laws that discriminate against white people, the only argument against this is that as it CURRENTLY stands, white women have benefited more in terms of raw numbers, this is a non-argument due to changing demographics (whites will be a minority and then the laws will hurt them even more) and in terms of PROPORTIONAL benefit, that has not gone to whites
2.Government says that forced segregation is bad, but forced integration is good
3.We can verify that the media is run by anti white people and this can be traced even further if you look into the names behind the people running it
12-28-2017, 10:51 AM
-
#219
- Maestro
- отличнo!
-
- Maestro
- отличнo!
- Join Date: Oct 2002
- Location: New Mexico, United States
- Posts: 58,400
- Rep Power: 203698
-
-
Originally Posted By foreverSNAFU⏩
GPA isn't the only factor anymore because of increased competition at home and abroad. This is especially true for college students applying to professional programs (medical/pharmacy/law etc) If your job ultimately has you working with the general public, an admissions committee would prefer to accept the 2.8GPA student that also played sports and participated in clubs and chit, as suppose to the 4.2 GPA student with the social skills of a baked potato.Seriously, stop dancing around the question and answer me. How is a GPA not the best indicator? Why can some people enter schools with a lower GPA that others who bust their asses off trying to get into those same schools can't with a much higher GPA.
Originally Posted By Azrairc⏩
You can post these silly articles until you're blue in the face. Those are opinion pieces, its one person with an opinion, and concocted because they were desperate for a story to write about. There is no general consensus anywhere that suggests that people think math is racist.
12-28-2017, 10:52 AM
-
#220
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
-
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
- Posts: 34,072
- Rep Power: 206818
-
-
Originally Posted By TheAmazon⏩
Yeah it's fringe, except it's not. This same crap is parroted on every major campus these days, and today's SJW student body is tomorrows.. everything.ITT salon articles and fringe postings by dump people on Tumblr = discrimination.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."
-Hercules
Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
12-28-2017, 10:56 AM
-
#221
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
It's SO fringe that even the highest ranking democrats are parroting itYeah it's fringe, except it's not. This same crap is parroted on every major campus these days, and today's SJW student body is tomorrows.. everything.

FRINGE INDEED!
12-28-2017, 10:57 AM
-
#222
- MajesticLion
- fidélité à la mort
-
- MajesticLion
- fidélité à la mort
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Posts: 18,671
- Rep Power: 67123
-
-
- "not my fault, it wasn't me, get over it, get to work"
-remembers everything, puts the work in, succeeds on own terms
- "discrimination! panic!lebensraum!MAGA!"
Wash, rinse, repeat.
-remembers everything, puts the work in, succeeds on own terms
- "discrimination! panic!lebensraum!MAGA!"
Wash, rinse, repeat.
12-28-2017, 10:58 AM
-
#223
- pellekuling
- Registered User
-
- pellekuling
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2014
- Location: Northern Mariana Islands
- Age: 30
- Posts: 5,742
- Rep Power: 9550
-
-
[QUOTE=NVious post_id=1538825501]You do understand black women are only 6% of the population right?
Affirmative action may help white women more in terms of raw numbers than individual groups (blacks, Hispanics etc), however proportionally speaking, it helps out those groups more.
Anyways on to the topic at hand, some whites may feel discriminated against because:
1.There are anti white laws on the books in affirmative action, although they ultimately hurt Asians the most, whites are still the majority and will thus feel it the most
2.The CRA ended freedom of association and the rights for businesses to deny service for any reason, nowadays you have ridiculous signs like this:
[Ig]https://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17qa58affzabcjpg/ku-medium.jpg[/Img]
That just want to say one thing, that is currently illegal.
If forced segregation is bad (government mandated), why is forced integration (government mandated) good?
3.The media is verifiably run by anti white people and the democrats (50% of the population are also the anti white party). Examples:
[youtube]GYFO5fiPfP0[/youube]
[youtube]v5v-n74Opyw[/youtbe]
[youtube]lBTDcKkErPM[/youube]
[img]https://tomfernandez28.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/capture29.png?w=670[/Ig]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/q32tc9I.jpg[/ig]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/bmrLLV1.jpg[/ig]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/se9M8l5.jpg[/ig]
So to sum up:
1.There are laws that discriminate against white people, the only argument against this is that as it CURRENTLY stands, white women have benefited more in terms of raw numbers, this is a non-argument due to changing demographics (whites will be a minority and then the laws will hurt them even more) and in terms of PROPORTIONAL benefit, that has not gone to whites
2.Government says that forced segregation is bad, but forced integration is good
3.We can verify that the media is run by anti white people and this can be traced even further if you look into the names behind the people running it[/QUOTE]It so sad.. seeing the pics of Ebba is honestly heartbreaking, and I dont consider my self emotional. And the terrorist attack is pretty much forgotten here already. Maybe from time to time you will se an article related to it. But time just goes on like nothing happened.
Affirmative action may help white women more in terms of raw numbers than individual groups (blacks, Hispanics etc), however proportionally speaking, it helps out those groups more.
Anyways on to the topic at hand, some whites may feel discriminated against because:
1.There are anti white laws on the books in affirmative action, although they ultimately hurt Asians the most, whites are still the majority and will thus feel it the most
2.The CRA ended freedom of association and the rights for businesses to deny service for any reason, nowadays you have ridiculous signs like this:
[Ig]https://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17qa58affzabcjpg/ku-medium.jpg[/Img]
That just want to say one thing, that is currently illegal.
If forced segregation is bad (government mandated), why is forced integration (government mandated) good?
3.The media is verifiably run by anti white people and the democrats (50% of the population are also the anti white party). Examples:
[youtube]GYFO5fiPfP0[/youube]
[youtube]v5v-n74Opyw[/youtbe]
[youtube]lBTDcKkErPM[/youube]
[img]https://tomfernandez28.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/capture29.png?w=670[/Ig]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/q32tc9I.jpg[/ig]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/bmrLLV1.jpg[/ig]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/se9M8l5.jpg[/ig]
So to sum up:
1.There are laws that discriminate against white people, the only argument against this is that as it CURRENTLY stands, white women have benefited more in terms of raw numbers, this is a non-argument due to changing demographics (whites will be a minority and then the laws will hurt them even more) and in terms of PROPORTIONAL benefit, that has not gone to whites
2.Government says that forced segregation is bad, but forced integration is good
3.We can verify that the media is run by anti white people and this can be traced even further if you look into the names behind the people running it[/QUOTE]It so sad.. seeing the pics of Ebba is honestly heartbreaking, and I dont consider my self emotional. And the terrorist attack is pretty much forgotten here already. Maybe from time to time you will se an article related to it. But time just goes on like nothing happened.
there's only one way to become champion. Never lose
It's all so tiresome. - Chinese Man
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=voF2KBScFkk
12-28-2017, 10:59 AM
-
#224
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
-
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
- Posts: 34,072
- Rep Power: 206818
-
-
Originally Posted By NVious⏩
It's the same "No True Scotsman" fallacy I always hear from feminists when you hear some feminazi rambling on about killing all men. "Hurr durr, that wasn't a REAL feminist!". Ok sure, how many feminists need to claim that **** before we can safely say it's a belief held by feminists? They always try to distance themselves from these kinds of statements when you call them out on them, but until then they're perfectly happy to make racist claims about white people, or sexist claims about men (all men are rapists, dontcha know?). Suddenly when they're called out though.. it's a "Fringe" element in their group, and not representative of the whole. It's BS and they know it.It's SO fringe that even the highest ranking democrats are parroting it

FRINGE INDEED!

FRINGE INDEED!
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."
-Hercules
Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
12-28-2017, 11:04 AM
-
#225
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
-
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
- Join Date: Mar 2014
- Posts: 34,506
- Rep Power: 127306
-
-
Originally Posted By MattBro95⏩
I don't think it's whites vs everyone else, that's the model that alt-righters are presenting.Well, why would they want to create a whites v everyone else mentality, when this could actually lead to the undermining of the system they currently have in place?
There's; liberals vs conservative (IMO they both neoliberal and pro-interventionism, so it's a asissine rivalry), religion vs religion, middle class vs the poor, tradies vs office workers, pro-LGBT vs Anti LGBT, men vs women, etc.
Any kind of conflict involving the middle class, working class and poor keeps us from uniting and bringing down international finance capitalism and the Deep State.
Honestly, I have not really experienced what you are talking about...
Can't say I really noticed it during school.... Certainly do not feel it in the media, unless they are preparing us for some form of "intervention" in another part of the world.
Maybe if you are talking about the actions of the state in the present, but we are pretty much taught to be ashamed of the entirety of Britain's history, other than our involvement WWI and WWII.
Unfortunately for them, the public have largely ignored it.
What I was referring to was teaching Civic Nationalism was made law in British schools in 2014....Can't say I really noticed it during school.... Certainly do not feel it in the media, unless they are preparing us for some form of "intervention" in another part of the world.
Maybe if you are talking about the actions of the state in the present, but we are pretty much taught to be ashamed of the entirety of Britain's history, other than our involvement WWI and WWII.
Unfortunately for them, the public have largely ignored it.
http://www.doingsmsc.org.uk/british-values/
If nationalism was as taboo in the UK, as British Alt Righters (eg. Millenial Woes) trying to pretend to the US alt right, then the British government would not have made it mandatory.
If You Don't Like To Talk About Your Feelings, This Might Help...
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178926621
The Most Heartbreaking Thing That I've Learned About 'The Elite'.
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178536851
Bitcoin And 'The Elite' - Why Bitcoin Is Not Revolutionary
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=179820783
12-28-2017, 11:10 AM
-
#226
12-28-2017, 11:11 AM
-
#227
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
-
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
- Join Date: Mar 2014
- Posts: 34,506
- Rep Power: 127306
-
-
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
Regarding the underlined, I think a lot of people agree with strict immigration and even ethnonationalism for countries that aren't multigenerational multiracial countries (eg. Poland, Hungary). Notice that it's 'elites' in the EU and media that are staunchly opposed to it.People often say this and they're not wrong, but the solution presented is always 'can't we all just get along!?' instead of wanting to prevent the necessary conditions in the first place.People won't get over and forget about their race or ethnicity.
Some Alt Righters (eg Millenial Woes) have promoted the forced deportation of non whites from a multigenerational multiracial country like Europe. I know some US alt righters want forced deportation of non whites too. That's their solution.
I'm not talking about 'workers of the world uniting', I'm not a Marxist and I never once mentioned that.
Autarky and cultural nationalism (my proposal) =/= 'workers of the world uniting.
We won't all sing kumbaya together. The workers of the world will not unite. But if you see ethnic conflict as inevitable and want to prevent it you're a wacist apparently.
What is your solution?If You Don't Like To Talk About Your Feelings, This Might Help...
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178926621
The Most Heartbreaking Thing That I've Learned About 'The Elite'.
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178536851
Bitcoin And 'The Elite' - Why Bitcoin Is Not Revolutionary
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=179820783
12-28-2017, 11:16 AM
-
#228
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
-
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
- Join Date: Mar 2014
- Posts: 34,506
- Rep Power: 127306
-
-
Originally Posted By stevedarsh⏩
If that's true, then that destroys the basis of a lot of white nationalists arguments (ie. statistics).Anyone with half a brain will tell you sociology isn't a legitimate field of study. It's what people do in college when they don't want to go to class Thursday or Friday, so they have more nights to go out drinking and sleeping with strangers.
If You Don't Like To Talk About Your Feelings, This Might Help...
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178926621
The Most Heartbreaking Thing That I've Learned About 'The Elite'.
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178536851
Bitcoin And 'The Elite' - Why Bitcoin Is Not Revolutionary
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=179820783
12-28-2017, 11:18 AM
-
#229
- butwhowasgains
- Neet slayer
-
- butwhowasgains
- Neet slayer
- Join Date: Dec 2015
- Location: New Zealand
- Posts: 12,680
- Rep Power: 77894
-
-
In on dogmatic thread where the world is always strictly divided into right and wrong and U are always right!
I have a dream, that one day, my username will be ironic.
Chairman of the purge.
Every post by this user is made soley for the enjoyment of cia analysts.
12-28-2017, 11:18 AM
-
#230
- Xanthippus
- Cyclist
-
- Xanthippus
- Cyclist
- Join Date: Jun 2007
- Posts: 730
- Rep Power: 293
-
-
The only race expected to voluntarily give up their countries and genetic lineage in the name of 'progress'. Seems discriminatory to me.
12-28-2017, 11:24 AM
-
#231
- SuperHercules
- Join Date: Jun 2014
- Height: 6'5"
- Posts: 32,559
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 572036
-
-
I'm glad I moved before all of this got out of control
I'm in a place now where white men are still appreciated
I'm in a place now where white men are still appreciated
12-28-2017, 11:30 AM
-
#232
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
-
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
- Join Date: Mar 2014
- Posts: 34,506
- Rep Power: 127306
-
-
Originally Posted By NVious⏩
Do you have stats for that claim?You do understand black women are only 6% of the population right?
Affirmative action may help white women more in terms of raw numbers than individual groups (blacks, Hispanics etc),however proportionally speaking, it helps out those groups more.
Affirmative action may help white women more in terms of raw numbers than individual groups (blacks, Hispanics etc),however proportionally speaking, it helps out those groups more.
Most alt-righters I've seen stay away from making affirmative action as part of their case from anti-white bias, because it's widely known that white women benefit the most from affirmative action.
"While people of color, individually and as groups, have been helped by affirmative action in the subsequent years, data and studies suggest women — white women in particular — have benefited disproportionately. According to one study, in 1995, 6 million women, the majority of whom were white, had jobs they wouldn’t have otherwise held but for affirmative action.
Another study shows that women made greater gains in employment at companies that do business with the federal government, which are therefore subject to federal affirmative-action requirements, than in other companies — with female employment rising 15.2% at federal contractors but only 2.2% elsewhere. And the women working for federal-contractor companies also held higher positions and were paid better.
Even in the private sector, the advancements of white women eclipse those of people of color. After *** established its own affirmative-action program, the numbers of women in management positions more than tripled in less than 10 years. Data from subsequent years show that the number of executives of color at *** also grew, but not nearly at the same rate."
http://ideas.time.com/2013/06/17/aff...e-than-anyone/
"Today, women outnumber men on college campuses and are more likely to earn their bachelor’s degrees and attend graduate school than men. More than 30 years after affirmative action was extended to include women, the percentage of female physicians jumped from 7.6 to 25.2. However, these improvement are more likely to benefit white women than women of color. "
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entr...b0353fbb33e1bb
"The numbers prove it: After two decades of affirmative action, it was white women who held the majority of managerial jobs, compared to African American, Latino, and Asian American women (the supposed beneficiaries of these policies), according to a 1995 report by the California Senate Government Organization Committee. Across the board, affirmative action helped women obtain success in the labor market. Today, women are more educated and successful in the workforce than ever before, while married women are taking over as household breadwinners."
"Since then, affirmative action has been disproportionately beneficial to white women, according to HuffPo. While there were 1.6 males for every female graduating from a four-year university in 1960, by 2003 the numbers reversed: women outnumbered men in colleges, with 1.35 females for every male and women earning 57 percent of all bachelors degrees by 2009."
https://www.bustle.com/p/who-does-af...pponents-74034
If You Don't Like To Talk About Your Feelings, This Might Help...
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178926621
The Most Heartbreaking Thing That I've Learned About 'The Elite'.
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178536851
Bitcoin And 'The Elite' - Why Bitcoin Is Not Revolutionary
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=179820783
12-28-2017, 11:33 AM
-
#233
- Peter Ruby
- Yes, I lift.
-
- Peter Ruby
- Yes, I lift.
- Join Date: Oct 2007
- Posts: 14,453
- Rep Power: 202205
-
-
Why are 100% of OPs *******s? I don't know, but they sure are as evident by this thread and it's OP.
12-28-2017, 11:35 AM
-
#234
- DolphinPilot
- Join Date: May 2015
- Posts: 49,469
- Rep Power: 367822
-
-
Originally Posted By SuperHercules⏩
Fire Island?I'm glad I moved before all of this got out of control
I'm in a place now where white men are still appreciated
I'm in a place now where white men are still appreciated
12-28-2017, 11:35 AM
-
#235
- orangetide
- Registered User
-
- orangetide
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2010
- Posts: 10,691
- Rep Power: 35630
-
-
i am white, i was denied admission to 3/9 of the grad schools i applied to becuase I "did not contribute to diversity and inclusion measures taken at this time". I had 12 published papers, 3.8 gpa, top 3% GRE scores.
in the master's program i chose:
- hispanic student only has to pay 20% of his tuition (personally seen the statements). this is not becuase he applied for a scholarship or grant, the school gave him one of their diversity grants. His parents make a chit ton, I have seen snaps of him chillin in his house.
- foreign asian girl, that has to pay upfront for tuition (parents money) also gets huge tuition cuts for being a minority (lol at several billion asians on this planet being a minority). she bert stared me when she found that I did not get the same cuts.
in the master's program i chose:
- hispanic student only has to pay 20% of his tuition (personally seen the statements). this is not becuase he applied for a scholarship or grant, the school gave him one of their diversity grants. His parents make a chit ton, I have seen snaps of him chillin in his house.
- foreign asian girl, that has to pay upfront for tuition (parents money) also gets huge tuition cuts for being a minority (lol at several billion asians on this planet being a minority). she bert stared me when she found that I did not get the same cuts.
12-28-2017, 11:38 AM
-
#236
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
-
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
- Posts: 34,072
- Rep Power: 206818
-
-
Originally Posted By orangetide⏩
Careful, anecdotes are only allowed when leftists use them. Then it's all "listen and believe".i am white, i was denied admission to 3/9 of the grad schools i applied to becuase I "did not contribute to diversity and inclusion measures taken at this time". I had 12 published papers, 3.8 gpa, top 3% GRE scores.
in the master's program i chose:
- hispanic student only has to pay 20% of his tuition (personally seen the statements). this is not becuase he applied for a scholarship or grant, the school gave him one of their diversity grants. His parents make a chit ton, I have seen snaps of him chillin in his house.
- foreign asian girl, that has to pay upfront for tuition (parents money) also gets huge tuition cuts for being a minority (lol at several billion asians on this planet being a minority). she bert stared me when she found that I did not get the same cuts.
in the master's program i chose:
- hispanic student only has to pay 20% of his tuition (personally seen the statements). this is not becuase he applied for a scholarship or grant, the school gave him one of their diversity grants. His parents make a chit ton, I have seen snaps of him chillin in his house.
- foreign asian girl, that has to pay upfront for tuition (parents money) also gets huge tuition cuts for being a minority (lol at several billion asians on this planet being a minority). she bert stared me when she found that I did not get the same cuts.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."
-Hercules
Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
12-28-2017, 11:43 AM
-
#237
12-28-2017, 11:45 AM
-
#238
- AmIGoodNuff
- Registered User
-
- AmIGoodNuff
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2014
- Age: 29
- Posts: 10,028
- Rep Power: 23763
-
-
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
So youre saying America right now is ran the way white ppl wanna run it because they r the majority? Where is the descrimination against white ppl then?Racism can be both a symptom and a disease.
There's no problem if they all assimilate. The problem is if the whites want the US to be run one way, the blacks another way, the mexicans another way, and the asians another way. When you have political division by race those divisions bleed into other aspects of life and manifest as racism. ESPECIALLY when politicians stoke prejudices to turn a voting bloc to their candidacy.
There's no problem if they all assimilate. The problem is if the whites want the US to be run one way, the blacks another way, the mexicans another way, and the asians another way. When you have political division by race those divisions bleed into other aspects of life and manifest as racism. ESPECIALLY when politicians stoke prejudices to turn a voting bloc to their candidacy.
B:300 S:405 D:485
2/5/17: The Crowning of King Brady.
"I have embraced my Autism. I am a proud Autist. I believe it endows me with special powers that are incomprehensible to pathetic normies like you. I would gladly sacrifice any chance at a normal life to benefit from the GIFT that is AUTISM."-Ausaric
12-28-2017, 11:47 AM
-
#239
- HoustonMiscer
- Registered User
-
- HoustonMiscer
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Age: 37
- Posts: 47,690
- Rep Power: 253714
-
-
I'm not going to lie, I have been racist against whites many times in my life and I am not sorry for it, it is what it is
Houston Sign Stealers
DEMECO RYANS HC CREW
Ugly Ass Mf Crew
Manlet Crew
Texas Crew
just be yourself
just have confidence
XOTWOD CREW
12-28-2017, 11:48 AM
-
#240
Originally Posted By BetaAsPhuck⏩
Affirmative action started in the 60s, white female population was around 40% whereas black population was still around 12% (nearly a multiple of 4), today that number is still 30% to 12% (still nearly a multiple of 3) if you're comparing black v white.Do you have stats for that claim?
Most alt-righters I've seen stay away from making affirmative action as part of their case from anti-white bias, because it's widely known that white women benefit the most from affirmative action.
"While people of color, individually and as groups, have been helped by affirmative action in the subsequent years, data and studies suggest women — white women in particular — have benefited disproportionately. According to one study, in 1995, 6 million women, the majority of whom were white, had jobs they wouldn’t have otherwise held but for affirmative action.
Another study shows that women made greater gains in employment at companies that do business with the federal government, which are therefore subject to federal affirmative-action requirements, than in other companies — with female employment rising 15.2% at federal contractors but only 2.2% elsewhere. And the women working for federal-contractor companies also held higher positions and were paid better.
Even in the private sector, the advancements of white women eclipse those of people of color. After *** established its own affirmative-action program, the numbers of women in management positions more than tripled in less than 10 years. Data from subsequent years show that the number of executives of color at *** also grew, but not nearly at the same rate."
http://ideas.time.com/2013/06/17/aff...e-than-anyone/
"Today, women outnumber men on college campuses and are more likely to earn their bachelor’s degrees and attend graduate school than men. More than 30 years after affirmative action was extended to include women, the percentage of female physicians jumped from 7.6 to 25.2. However, these improvement are more likely to benefit white women than women of color. "
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entr...b0353fbb33e1bb
"The numbers prove it: After two decades of affirmative action, it was white women who held the majority of managerial jobs, compared to African American, Latino, and Asian American women (the supposed beneficiaries of these policies), according to a 1995 report by the California Senate Government Organization Committee. Across the board, affirmative action helped women obtain success in the labor market. Today, women are more educated and successful in the workforce than ever before, while married women are taking over as household breadwinners."
"Since then, affirmative action has been disproportionately beneficial to white women, according to HuffPo. While there were 1.6 males for every female graduating from a four-year university in 1960, by 2003 the numbers reversed: women outnumbered men in colleges, with 1.35 females for every male and women earning 57 percent of all bachelors degrees by 2009."
https://www.bustle.com/p/who-does-af...pponents-74034
Most alt-righters I've seen stay away from making affirmative action as part of their case from anti-white bias, because it's widely known that white women benefit the most from affirmative action.
"While people of color, individually and as groups, have been helped by affirmative action in the subsequent years, data and studies suggest women — white women in particular — have benefited disproportionately. According to one study, in 1995, 6 million women, the majority of whom were white, had jobs they wouldn’t have otherwise held but for affirmative action.
Another study shows that women made greater gains in employment at companies that do business with the federal government, which are therefore subject to federal affirmative-action requirements, than in other companies — with female employment rising 15.2% at federal contractors but only 2.2% elsewhere. And the women working for federal-contractor companies also held higher positions and were paid better.
Even in the private sector, the advancements of white women eclipse those of people of color. After *** established its own affirmative-action program, the numbers of women in management positions more than tripled in less than 10 years. Data from subsequent years show that the number of executives of color at *** also grew, but not nearly at the same rate."
http://ideas.time.com/2013/06/17/aff...e-than-anyone/
"Today, women outnumber men on college campuses and are more likely to earn their bachelor’s degrees and attend graduate school than men. More than 30 years after affirmative action was extended to include women, the percentage of female physicians jumped from 7.6 to 25.2. However, these improvement are more likely to benefit white women than women of color. "
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entr...b0353fbb33e1bb
"The numbers prove it: After two decades of affirmative action, it was white women who held the majority of managerial jobs, compared to African American, Latino, and Asian American women (the supposed beneficiaries of these policies), according to a 1995 report by the California Senate Government Organization Committee. Across the board, affirmative action helped women obtain success in the labor market. Today, women are more educated and successful in the workforce than ever before, while married women are taking over as household breadwinners."
"Since then, affirmative action has been disproportionately beneficial to white women, according to HuffPo. While there were 1.6 males for every female graduating from a four-year university in 1960, by 2003 the numbers reversed: women outnumbered men in colleges, with 1.35 females for every male and women earning 57 percent of all bachelors degrees by 2009."
https://www.bustle.com/p/who-does-af...pponents-74034
The numbers you gave do not consider this, one thing we CAN say for sure is that blacks have the lowest SAT scores, whereas whites are 2nd to Asians, so what the left would have to demonstrate would be:
1.The correlation between SAT score and benefit, i.e 2 white women getting in with 50 points below the lower threshold v 1 black getting in at 200 points below threshold can be described in two different ways, either 2 white women for every black male OR one black male getting disproportionate benefit SAT score per SAT score
2.That somehow white women are getting benefit BEYOND what their population number states they should
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts