Forum
»
Why do 55% of white people think they're discriminated against?
12-29-2017, 02:44 AM
-
#361
- AbsAreAbsent
- Registered User
-
- AbsAreAbsent
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2015
- Age: 32
- Posts: 910
- Rep Power: 1343
-
-
lol i cant believe this thread is srs.
12-29-2017, 03:32 AM
-
#362
- Aahl
- 3 fishoils E3D crew*
-
- Aahl
- 3 fishoils E3D crew*
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Location: New Zealand
- Posts: 2,061
- Rep Power: 2559
-
-
tbh keep migrants to latinas andc middle eastern girls. Fkn cant get my dick hard at all for azn,indian or black girlz. Ever since migrants started pouring in quality of poon as has gown down alot.
12-29-2017, 12:33 PM
-
#363
- seanb1979
- Platinum User
-
- seanb1979
- Platinum User
- Join Date: Dec 2006
- Location: Boise, Idaho, United States
- Posts: 48,650
- Rep Power: 150567
-
-
Originally Posted By dontwantnohoe⏩
Answer this simple question: Is it now ok to be anti white and show hate for all white people because black people were horribly oppressed in the past? Yes or no.There's a lot of white people crying in this thread. Whites have not had it anywhere as bad as blacks. There are a lot of whites extremely sensitive these days.
I'm white btw.
I'm white btw.
A million miles away - I don't.. feel.... anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXGZu4yxjW0
12-29-2017, 01:02 PM
-
#364
- vsukicker
- C-A-N-E-S CANES!
-
- vsukicker
- C-A-N-E-S CANES!
- Join Date: Jul 2007
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States
- Posts: 9,191
- Rep Power: 5378
-
-
what countries are the best in the world?
white countries/ thread
white countries/ thread
Miami Hurricanes
***Georgia Crew***
Swedish/Cuban Crew.....only member
Hair of the Gods Crew
I found that if you have a goal, you might not reach it. But if you don't have one, then you are never disappointed. And I gotta tell ya, it feels phenomenal.
12-29-2017, 01:08 PM
-
#365
- DoYouEvenNEM
- Registered User
-
- DoYouEvenNEM
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2015
- Age: 43
- Posts: 6,078
- Rep Power: 6728
-
-
Originally Posted By Aahl⏩
Thought the same where I grew up.tbh keep migrants to latinas andc middle eastern girls. Fkn cant get my dick hard at all for azn,indian or black girlz. Ever since migrants started pouring in quality of poon as has gown down alot.
Why are they only letting in ugly bishes immigrate? What about all the Eastern European HBBs who make $400/month and would love to move here?
I remember some statistic like 50% of Hungarian adults don't have a job. Why are western countries importing 3rd world people when there's Europeans who could be coming over? Hungarian women also have some of the biggest teddies in Europe.
Immigration policy never makes sense most of the time.
12-29-2017, 01:10 PM
-
#366
- seanb1979
- Platinum User
-
- seanb1979
- Platinum User
- Join Date: Dec 2006
- Location: Boise, Idaho, United States
- Posts: 48,650
- Rep Power: 150567
-
-
Originally Posted By DoYouEvenNEM⏩
****in this, hungarian and EE women in general are smooooooooooookin hot a lot of the time.. makes me wonder if they would stay that way surrounded by **** like mcdonalds and starbucks thoughThought the same where I grew up.
Why are they only letting in ugly bishes immigrate? What about all the Eastern European HBBs who make $400/month and would love to move here?
I remember some statistic like 50% of Hungarian adults don't have a job. Why are western countries importing 3rd world people when there's Europeans who could be coming over? Hungarian women also have some of the biggest teddies in Europe.
Immigration policy never makes sense most of the time.
Why are they only letting in ugly bishes immigrate? What about all the Eastern European HBBs who make $400/month and would love to move here?
I remember some statistic like 50% of Hungarian adults don't have a job. Why are western countries importing 3rd world people when there's Europeans who could be coming over? Hungarian women also have some of the biggest teddies in Europe.
Immigration policy never makes sense most of the time.
A million miles away - I don't.. feel.... anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXGZu4yxjW0
12-29-2017, 01:14 PM
-
#367
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
-
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Texas
- Posts: 50,517
- Rep Power: 458793
-
-
Here's the truth about "White Privilege"
White privilege was invented by (mostly white) liberals to explain why the black community is overall doing poorly. In terms of high school drop outs, drug use, criminal behavior, illiteracy, violence and other measurable things -- blacks are doing very poorly.
The problem for liberals is this: they were supposed to solve this problem in the late 70s with Johnson's "Great Society" programs, things we take for granted now, but this was a massive expansion of welfare and entitlement programs, things that they said would give minorities the leg up they needed to succeed.
What happened was the opposite. Things got demonstrably worse.
My thoughts: Johnson was quoted as saying that this would, "have those n-words voting Democrat for the next 200 years" and if he actually said that, he was right. We now know he was a former klansman, so take that into consideration.
These programs were not meant to help anyone, they were meant to control blacks and minorities. They were meant to hold them back. They were meant to make them dependent. They were meant to break up families (single parent households are shockingly more than 70% in black households).
In that sense, it was a success. These modern liberal policies destroyed the black community. As they have grown in scope, blacks and other minorities which are the primary beneficiariesonly get worse off.
Enter "White Privilege", we need some scapegoat to put the blame on. Let's blame inherent advantages whites have. Never mind things are demonstrably getting worse the more society has rejected it's racist/slavery past, for some reason it's still white privilege.
Why?
Because the truth means we roll back those programs and blacks are freed, they get better off and no longer vote 90% straight-ticket Democrat. Can't have that - so the liberal Overlords invent this nonsense and it gets pushed down to the sheep idiots who actually believe it and push it as real - and here we are.
White privilege was invented by (mostly white) liberals to explain why the black community is overall doing poorly. In terms of high school drop outs, drug use, criminal behavior, illiteracy, violence and other measurable things -- blacks are doing very poorly.
The problem for liberals is this: they were supposed to solve this problem in the late 70s with Johnson's "Great Society" programs, things we take for granted now, but this was a massive expansion of welfare and entitlement programs, things that they said would give minorities the leg up they needed to succeed.
What happened was the opposite. Things got demonstrably worse.
My thoughts: Johnson was quoted as saying that this would, "have those n-words voting Democrat for the next 200 years" and if he actually said that, he was right. We now know he was a former klansman, so take that into consideration.
These programs were not meant to help anyone, they were meant to control blacks and minorities. They were meant to hold them back. They were meant to make them dependent. They were meant to break up families (single parent households are shockingly more than 70% in black households).
In that sense, it was a success. These modern liberal policies destroyed the black community. As they have grown in scope, blacks and other minorities which are the primary beneficiariesonly get worse off.
Enter "White Privilege", we need some scapegoat to put the blame on. Let's blame inherent advantages whites have. Never mind things are demonstrably getting worse the more society has rejected it's racist/slavery past, for some reason it's still white privilege.
Why?
Because the truth means we roll back those programs and blacks are freed, they get better off and no longer vote 90% straight-ticket Democrat. Can't have that - so the liberal Overlords invent this nonsense and it gets pushed down to the sheep idiots who actually believe it and push it as real - and here we are.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
12-29-2017, 01:17 PM
-
#368
12-29-2017, 01:18 PM
-
#369
- Techriding101
- Registered User
-
- Techriding101
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Age: 38
- Posts: 16,097
- Rep Power: 78762
-
-
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
also worth pointing out most of the 'race' experts are in a revolving door of education/academia. Liberalism is a bane on societyHere's the truth about "White Privilege"
White privilege was invented by (mostly white) liberals to explain why the black community is overall doing poorly. In terms of high school drop outs, drug use, criminal behavior, illiteracy, violence and other measurable things -- blacks are doing very poorly.
The problem for liberals is this: they were supposed to solve this problem in the late 70s with Johnson's "Great Society" programs, things we take for granted now, but this was a massive expansion of welfare and entitlement programs, things that they said would give minorities the leg up they needed to succeed.
What happened was the opposite. Things got demonstrably worse.
My thoughts: Johnson was quoted as saying that this would, "have those n-words voting Democrat for the next 200 years" and if he actually said that, he was right. We now know he was a former klansman, so take that into consideration.
These programs were not meant to help anyone, they were meant to control blacks and minorities. They were meant to hold them back. They were meant to make them dependent. They were meant to break up families (single parent households are shockingly more than 70% in black households).
In that sense, it was a success. These modern liberal policies destroyed the black community. As they have grown in scope, blacks and other minorities which are the primary beneficiariesonly get worse off.
Enter "White Privilege", we need some scapegoat to put the blame on. Let's blame inherent advantages whites have. Never mind things are demonstrably getting worse the more society has rejected it's racist/slavery past, for some reason it's still white privilege.
Why?
Because the truth means we roll back those programs and blacks are freed, they get better off and no longer vote 90% straight-ticket Democrat. Can't have that - so the liberal Overlords invent this nonsense and it gets pushed down to the sheep idiots who actually believe it and push it as real - and here we are.
White privilege was invented by (mostly white) liberals to explain why the black community is overall doing poorly. In terms of high school drop outs, drug use, criminal behavior, illiteracy, violence and other measurable things -- blacks are doing very poorly.
The problem for liberals is this: they were supposed to solve this problem in the late 70s with Johnson's "Great Society" programs, things we take for granted now, but this was a massive expansion of welfare and entitlement programs, things that they said would give minorities the leg up they needed to succeed.
What happened was the opposite. Things got demonstrably worse.
My thoughts: Johnson was quoted as saying that this would, "have those n-words voting Democrat for the next 200 years" and if he actually said that, he was right. We now know he was a former klansman, so take that into consideration.
These programs were not meant to help anyone, they were meant to control blacks and minorities. They were meant to hold them back. They were meant to make them dependent. They were meant to break up families (single parent households are shockingly more than 70% in black households).
In that sense, it was a success. These modern liberal policies destroyed the black community. As they have grown in scope, blacks and other minorities which are the primary beneficiariesonly get worse off.
Enter "White Privilege", we need some scapegoat to put the blame on. Let's blame inherent advantages whites have. Never mind things are demonstrably getting worse the more society has rejected it's racist/slavery past, for some reason it's still white privilege.
Why?
Because the truth means we roll back those programs and blacks are freed, they get better off and no longer vote 90% straight-ticket Democrat. Can't have that - so the liberal Overlords invent this nonsense and it gets pushed down to the sheep idiots who actually believe it and push it as real - and here we are.
Free Men Don't Ask
You Wouldn't Download a Gun
https://ctrlpew.com/
Disclaimer: all content posted by Techriding101 is purely for roleplay purposes
12-29-2017, 01:23 PM
-
#370
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
-
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Texas
- Posts: 50,517
- Rep Power: 458793
-
-
Originally Posted By Techriding101⏩
Here is how it breaks down:also worth pointing out most of the 'race' experts are in a revolving door of education/academia. Liberalism is a bane on society
Overlords (Money & power brokers) --> Academia --> Entertainment/Media --> Masses of Lib useful idiots
The guys who make money or power off these ideas push it out to their plants in academia who couch the social theories in gibberish and jargon and present their theories as not just plausible but how things are. The media picks up on it, reports on it in glowing favorable terms and it's pushes as real in the various entertainment channels. Thus, it's filtered down to the hoards of useful dopes who then present these loony ideas as irrefutable facts, like white privilege or 68 genders or whatever other nonsense du jour is being shoveled down people's throats to sew chaos, entrench power or move governments into "action" where big money can be made behind the scenes.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
12-29-2017, 01:42 PM
-
#371
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
-
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
- Posts: 34,072
- Rep Power: 206818
-
-
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
Ah The Great Society. A chicken in every pot, and a cap in every ass.Here's the truth about "White Privilege"
White privilege was invented by (mostly white) liberals to explain why the black community is overall doing poorly. In terms of high school drop outs, drug use, criminal behavior, illiteracy, violence and other measurable things -- blacks are doing very poorly.
The problem for liberals is this: they were supposed to solve this problem in the late 70s with Johnson's "Great Society" programs, things we take for granted now, but this was a massive expansion of welfare and entitlement programs, things that they said would give minorities the leg up they needed to succeed.
What happened was the opposite. Things got demonstrably worse.
My thoughts: Johnson was quoted as saying that this would, "have those n-words voting Democrat for the next 200 years" and if he actually said that, he was right. We now know he was a former klansman, so take that into consideration.
These programs were not meant to help anyone, they were meant to control blacks and minorities. They were meant to hold them back. They were meant to make them dependent. They were meant to break up families (single parent households are shockingly more than 70% in black households).
In that sense, it was a success. These modern liberal policies destroyed the black community. As they have grown in scope, blacks and other minorities which are the primary beneficiariesonly get worse off.
Enter "White Privilege", we need some scapegoat to put the blame on. Let's blame inherent advantages whites have. Never mind things are demonstrably getting worse the more society has rejected it's racist/slavery past, for some reason it's still white privilege.
Why?
Because the truth means we roll back those programs and blacks are freed, they get better off and no longer vote 90% straight-ticket Democrat. Can't have that - so the liberal Overlords invent this nonsense and it gets pushed down to the sheep idiots who actually believe it and push it as real - and here we are.
White privilege was invented by (mostly white) liberals to explain why the black community is overall doing poorly. In terms of high school drop outs, drug use, criminal behavior, illiteracy, violence and other measurable things -- blacks are doing very poorly.
The problem for liberals is this: they were supposed to solve this problem in the late 70s with Johnson's "Great Society" programs, things we take for granted now, but this was a massive expansion of welfare and entitlement programs, things that they said would give minorities the leg up they needed to succeed.
What happened was the opposite. Things got demonstrably worse.
My thoughts: Johnson was quoted as saying that this would, "have those n-words voting Democrat for the next 200 years" and if he actually said that, he was right. We now know he was a former klansman, so take that into consideration.
These programs were not meant to help anyone, they were meant to control blacks and minorities. They were meant to hold them back. They were meant to make them dependent. They were meant to break up families (single parent households are shockingly more than 70% in black households).
In that sense, it was a success. These modern liberal policies destroyed the black community. As they have grown in scope, blacks and other minorities which are the primary beneficiariesonly get worse off.
Enter "White Privilege", we need some scapegoat to put the blame on. Let's blame inherent advantages whites have. Never mind things are demonstrably getting worse the more society has rejected it's racist/slavery past, for some reason it's still white privilege.
Why?
Because the truth means we roll back those programs and blacks are freed, they get better off and no longer vote 90% straight-ticket Democrat. Can't have that - so the liberal Overlords invent this nonsense and it gets pushed down to the sheep idiots who actually believe it and push it as real - and here we are.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."
-Hercules
Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
12-29-2017, 01:57 PM
-
#372
- p100
- Banned
-
- p100
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: Texas, United States
- Posts: 7,379
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
If race doesn't matter then why are we talking about it? Just stop talking about it and racism will go away. Treat everyone the same.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, the only current black Justice, opposes affirmative action. He believes the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids consideration of race, such as race-based affirmative action or preferential treatment. He also believes it creates "a cult of victimization" and implies blacks require "special treatment in order to succeed". Thomas also cites his own experiences of affirmative action programs as a reason for his criticism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirm...es#cite_ref-92
12-29-2017, 05:03 PM
-
#373
- iHateDeadlifts
- Registered User
-
- iHateDeadlifts
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2014
- Location: Texas, United States
- Posts: 3,842
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By seanb1979⏩
no, the problem is White people ( like white men such as yourself) think you are discriminated against acting like a fukin victim .............and you guys compare it to the same victimization Black people endured when your ancestors enslaved black people.Answer this simple question: Is it now ok to be anti white and show hate for all white people because black people were horribly oppressed in the past? Yes or no.
black people getting victimized in 1800 = getting sold to a white man to work at a plantation 24/7 for the rest of his life being seperated from his family forever and not being able to enroll in school, open up a bank account, or vote.
white people (usually white man like yourself) in 2017 = omg a buzzfeed article just called White men trash!!!! OMG my English professor just made up read an essay about White people being priviledged!!! OMG someone just called me a racist for voting for a racist President!!! WHITE PEOPLE ARE DISCRIMANTED AGAINST!!! white genocide is real!!! diversity is bad!!
see how much of a fukin retard you sound like? U sound b!tchmade - Seriously, no point in trying to argue with a white dude if they haven't realized by now in 2017 that you are NOT a victim. I just want to let you know how stupid and how much of a b1tch you sound like to the rest of the world.
12-29-2017, 06:51 PM
-
#374
- seanb1979
- Platinum User
-
- seanb1979
- Platinum User
- Join Date: Dec 2006
- Location: Boise, Idaho, United States
- Posts: 48,650
- Rep Power: 150567
-
-
Originally Posted By iHateDeadlifts⏩
Go kill yourself. You just want to ****ing insult people and be a piece of ****. I asked a simple question, and you agreed with me, and went full **** mode - negging off rc. I am ONLY talking about IS IT OK TO BE ****TY TO SOMEONE BASED ON RACE.no, the problem is White people ( like white men such as yourself) think you are discriminated against acting like a fukin victim .............and you guys compare it to the same victimization Black people endured when your ancestors enslaved black people.
black people getting victimized in 1800 = getting sold to a white man to work at a plantation 24/7 for the rest of his life being seperated from his family forever and not being able to enroll in school, open up a bank account, or vote.
white people (usually white man like yourself) in 2017 = omg a buzzfeed article just called White men trash!!!! OMG my English professor just made up read an essay about White people being priviledged!!! OMG someone just called me a racist for voting for a racist President!!! WHITE PEOPLE ARE DISCRIMANTED AGAINST!!! white genocide is real!!! diversity is bad!!
see how much of a fukin retard you sound like?U sound b!tchmade - Seriously, no point in trying to argue with a white dude if they haven't realized by now in 2017 that you are NOT a victim. I just want to let you know how stupid and how much of a b1tch you sound like to the rest of the world.
black people getting victimized in 1800 = getting sold to a white man to work at a plantation 24/7 for the rest of his life being seperated from his family forever and not being able to enroll in school, open up a bank account, or vote.
white people (usually white man like yourself) in 2017 = omg a buzzfeed article just called White men trash!!!! OMG my English professor just made up read an essay about White people being priviledged!!! OMG someone just called me a racist for voting for a racist President!!! WHITE PEOPLE ARE DISCRIMANTED AGAINST!!! white genocide is real!!! diversity is bad!!
see how much of a fukin retard you sound like?U sound b!tchmade - Seriously, no point in trying to argue with a white dude if they haven't realized by now in 2017 that you are NOT a victim. I just want to let you know how stupid and how much of a b1tch you sound like to the rest of the world.
A million miles away - I don't.. feel.... anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXGZu4yxjW0
12-29-2017, 07:06 PM
-
#375
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
-
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
- Posts: 34,072
- Rep Power: 206818
-
-
Originally Posted By seanb1979⏩
I already negged his dumb ass.Go kill yourself. You just want to ****ing insult people and be a piece of ****. I asked a simple question, and you agreed with me, and went full **** mode - negging off rc. I am ONLY talking about IS IT OK TO BE ****TY TO SOMEONE BASED ON RACE.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."
-Hercules
Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
12-29-2017, 07:08 PM
-
#376
- SaviorSelfJT
- clownslayer
-
- SaviorSelfJT
- clownslayer
- Join Date: Aug 2010
- Posts: 12,855
- Rep Power: 166618
-
-
Originally Posted By seanb1979⏩
Yeah and what is up with him bringing up slavery from 200 years ago.....you do realize that those people are long gone right?Go kill yourself. You just want to ****ing insult people and be a piece of ****. I asked a simple question, and you agreed with me, and went full **** mode - negging off rc. I am ONLY talking about IS IT OK TO BE ****TY TO SOMEONE BASED ON RACE.
Best lifts:
Bench press: 315x5
Squat: 465x1
Strict press: 205x5
Deadlift: 405x13 (conv tap'n'go with straps)
12-29-2017, 07:11 PM
-
#377
- foreverSNAFU
- A.W.E.S.O.M. - O
-
- foreverSNAFU
- A.W.E.S.O.M. - O
- Join Date: Jun 2011
- Age: 40
- Posts: 9,034
- Rep Power: 9425
-
-
Originally Posted By iHateDeadlifts⏩
My ancestors never enslaved anyone, I'm Polish, as a matter of fact, if anyone was enslaved in recent history, it was the Poles behind the iron curtain with the rest of the Eastern Block satellite states that the allies failed to protect.no, the problem is White people ( like white men such as yourself) think you are discriminated against acting like a fukin victim .............and you guys compare it to the same victimization Black people endured when your ancestors enslaved black people.
Educate yourself fool.
► South Florida Crew
12-29-2017, 07:11 PM
-
#378
- ohiostate124
- Pure-blood
-
- ohiostate124
- Pure-blood
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Location: Virginia, United States
- Posts: 31,403
- Rep Power: 325469
-
-
I don’t think I’m being discriminated against but I just think the idea that you can’t be racist to white people because of socioeconomic power or whatever the fuk is retarded. I actually have seen people say lately that you can’t actually rape white women because you don’t have power of them. I hope to god they were trolling.
12-29-2017, 07:12 PM
-
#379
Originally Posted By iHateDeadlifts⏩
50% of Africans were slaves in Africa.no, the problem is White people ( like white men such as yourself) think you are discriminated against acting like a fukin victim .............and you guys compare it to the same victimization Black people endured when your ancestors enslaved black people.
black people getting victimized in 1800 = getting sold to a white man to work at a plantation 24/7 for the rest of his life being seperated from his family forever and not being able to enroll in school, open up a bank account, or vote.
white people (usually white man like yourself) in 2017 = omg a buzzfeed article just called White men trash!!!! OMG my English professor just made up read an essay about White people being priviledged!!! OMG someone just called me a racist for voting for a racist President!!! WHITE PEOPLE ARE DISCRIMANTED AGAINST!!! white genocide is real!!! diversity is bad!!
see how much of a fukin retard you sound like? U sound b!tchmade - Seriously, no point in trying to argue with a white dude if they haven't realized by now in 2017 that you are NOT a victim. I just want to let you know how stupid and how much of a b1tch you sound like to the rest of the world.
black people getting victimized in 1800 = getting sold to a white man to work at a plantation 24/7 for the rest of his life being seperated from his family forever and not being able to enroll in school, open up a bank account, or vote.
white people (usually white man like yourself) in 2017 = omg a buzzfeed article just called White men trash!!!! OMG my English professor just made up read an essay about White people being priviledged!!! OMG someone just called me a racist for voting for a racist President!!! WHITE PEOPLE ARE DISCRIMANTED AGAINST!!! white genocide is real!!! diversity is bad!!
see how much of a fukin retard you sound like? U sound b!tchmade - Seriously, no point in trying to argue with a white dude if they haven't realized by now in 2017 that you are NOT a victim. I just want to let you know how stupid and how much of a b1tch you sound like to the rest of the world.
African slaves in America had higher standards of living than the average person in Africa (this can be charted by height charts, literacy rates and average life spans).http://thealternativehypothesis.org/...united-states/
Furthermore, Africans have been paid trillions of dollars in welfare since the start of the welfare system which is redistribution from whites to blacks as whites pay the majority of taxes in America and blacks are in a perpetual deficit.http://thealternativehypothesis.org/...united-states/http://takimag.com/article/a_reparat...#axzz52hpEDYxj
Finally, slavery still goes on until today, whites were the only group of people that cared to end it and Arabs/Jews have never once been held accountable even verbally for their involvement in the slave trade and in continuing it on today, why is that?
As far as actual discrimination goes, I have demonstrated that there ARE laws on the books that do discriminate against whites (affirmative action and the changing of freedom of association)http://thealternativehypothesis.org/...mative-action/
It is clear that the elite universities in the United States are discriminating against whites in an extreme manner, to the point where whites, particularly non-jewish whites, are strictly underrepresented relative to their percentage of the population. By their population, they should be 55% of the people at these Universities, and by their merit should be around 72%. But admissions officers have made sure that their average student body is only 44.35% white.
There is also immense anti white bias in the media where hating on whites is ok, the DNC also publicly hates on white peoplehttps://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...post1538826161and there are many college/university courses which spawn future anti white Marxists.
I'm not going to disparage you or call you names like you have done, although if you cannot address the brunt of my argument here about the TRUTH about slavery, actual LAWS which discriminate against whites and media/leftist behavior, you have NOTHING to add to this conversation and are merely as biased as you think the other side is.
12-29-2017, 07:14 PM
-
#380
- SaviorSelfJT
- clownslayer
-
- SaviorSelfJT
- clownslayer
- Join Date: Aug 2010
- Posts: 12,855
- Rep Power: 166618
-
-
Originally Posted By foreverSNAFU⏩
Why would it even matter if your ancestors enslaved anyone? You aren't your ancestors (you personally haven't enslaved anyone), and you don't inherit your parents sins.My ancestors never enslaved anyone, I'm Polish, as a matter of fact, if anyone was enslaved in recent history, it was the Poles behind the iron curtain with the rest of the Eastern Block satellite states that the allies failed to protect.
Educate yourself fool.
Educate yourself fool.
Even so, still what difference would it make? The people that were enslaved are no longer alive, and their struggles aren't relevant to the struggles of today.
He keeps bringing up slavery from long ago as if it were some hot button social issue today lol
Best lifts:
Bench press: 315x5
Squat: 465x1
Strict press: 205x5
Deadlift: 405x13 (conv tap'n'go with straps)
12-29-2017, 08:02 PM
-
#381
- MoeBettuh
- Golden boy
-
- MoeBettuh
- Golden boy
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,468
- Rep Power: 142304
-
-
Originally Posted By iHateDeadlifts⏩
You're going to end up red, srs. You're exactly what's wrong with everything.no, the problem is White people ( like white men such as yourself) think you are discriminated against acting like a fukin victim .............and you guys compare it to the same victimization Black people endured when your ancestors enslaved black people.
black people getting victimized in 1800 = getting sold to a white man to work at a plantation 24/7 for the rest of his life being seperated from his family forever and not being able to enroll in school, open up a bank account, or vote.
white people (usually white man like yourself) in 2017 = omg a buzzfeed article just called White men trash!!!! OMG my English professor just made up read an essay about White people being priviledged!!! OMG someone just called me a racist for voting for a racist President!!! WHITE PEOPLE ARE DISCRIMANTED AGAINST!!! white genocide is real!!! diversity is bad!!
see how much of a fukin retard you sound like? U sound b!tchmade - Seriously, no point in trying to argue with a white dude if they haven't realized by now in 2017 that you are NOT a victim. I just want to let you know how stupid and how much of a b1tch you sound like to the rest of the world.
black people getting victimized in 1800 = getting sold to a white man to work at a plantation 24/7 for the rest of his life being seperated from his family forever and not being able to enroll in school, open up a bank account, or vote.
white people (usually white man like yourself) in 2017 = omg a buzzfeed article just called White men trash!!!! OMG my English professor just made up read an essay about White people being priviledged!!! OMG someone just called me a racist for voting for a racist President!!! WHITE PEOPLE ARE DISCRIMANTED AGAINST!!! white genocide is real!!! diversity is bad!!
see how much of a fukin retard you sound like? U sound b!tchmade - Seriously, no point in trying to argue with a white dude if they haven't realized by now in 2017 that you are NOT a victim. I just want to let you know how stupid and how much of a b1tch you sound like to the rest of the world.
MFC
drum, it holds fifty, uh
12-29-2017, 08:12 PM
-
#382
- fleeceitout
- Triggering the alt-left
-
- fleeceitout
- Triggering the alt-left
- Join Date: Aug 2015
- Posts: 10,281
- Rep Power: 28014
-
-
Lol are black peoplr still crying about slavery?
1. It’s not exclusive to you, slavery has existed throughout history & still continues to this day.
2. It happened nearly 200 years ago, how long is it going to be a crutch?
My people were rounded up, forced from their homeland & shipped across the ocean as “convicts” (slaves). This happened in the same time period, am I oppressed or doesn’t it count because I’m white?
1. It’s not exclusive to you, slavery has existed throughout history & still continues to this day.
2. It happened nearly 200 years ago, how long is it going to be a crutch?
My people were rounded up, forced from their homeland & shipped across the ocean as “convicts” (slaves). This happened in the same time period, am I oppressed or doesn’t it count because I’m white?
Your favorite miscer’s favorite miscer.
12-29-2017, 08:12 PM
-
#383
- BigPoppaPumpin
- Bish Be Humble
-
- BigPoppaPumpin
- Bish Be Humble
- Join Date: Oct 2015
- Posts: 2,562
- Rep Power: 804
-
-
Originally Posted By NVious⏩
What about the other 50%?50% of Africans were slaves in Africa.
Originally Posted By NVious⏩
Would you rather be free and uncomfortable or a someone else's property and slightly more comfortable?African slaves in America had higher standards of living than the average person in Africa (this can be charted by height charts, literacy rates and average life spans).http://thealternativehypothesis.org/...united-states/
Originally Posted By NVious⏩
Whites pay the majority of taxes and whites receive the majority of welfare. Anything poor black people do, poor white people also do. Just go to any poor white town in middle America or the south. And there are many many many more poor white people than poor black people.Furthermore, Africans have been paid trillions of dollars in welfare since the start of the welfare system which is redistribution from whites to blacks as whites pay the majority of taxes in America and blacks are in a perpetual deficit.http://thealternativehypothesis.org/...united-states/http://takimag.com/article/a_reparat...#axzz52hpEDYxj
Originally Posted By NVious⏩
Yes, slavery still goes on today, but everyone is doing it, whites, blacks, arabs, jews, asians, hispanics.Finally, slavery still goes on until today, whites were the only group of people that cared to end it and Arabs/Jews have never once been held accountable even verbally for their involvement in the slave trade and in continuing it on today, why is that?
Originally Posted By NVious⏩
Affirmative action isn't a law. It's an institution action. So when Harvard says we're going to have a 10% black student population, there's no law on the books that discriminates against white people (if you want to call it discrimination). Rather, Harvard has made a choice to have more racial diversity among its students. Whether you agree or not with the institution's action, you can't call it a law on the books.As far as actual discrimination goes, I have demonstrated that there ARE laws on the books that do discriminate against whites (affirmative action and the changing of freedom of association)http://thealternativehypothesis.org/...mative-action/
It is clear that the elite universities in the United States are discriminating against whites in an extreme manner, to the point where whites, particularly non-jewish whites, are strictly underrepresented relative to their percentage of the population. By their population, they should be 55% of the people at these Universities, and by their merit should be around 72%. But admissions officers have made sure that their average student body is only 44.35% white.
It is clear that the elite universities in the United States are discriminating against whites in an extreme manner, to the point where whites, particularly non-jewish whites, are strictly underrepresented relative to their percentage of the population. By their population, they should be 55% of the people at these Universities, and by their merit should be around 72%. But admissions officers have made sure that their average student body is only 44.35% white.
So if we can agree that affirmative action is an institution action, and not a law on the books. I don't think you'll disagree with me that there are many more discriminatory institutions towards black people than towards white people? I'm talking pure statistics. (eg crime, punishment, credit...)
Originally Posted By NVious⏩
Again this is institution action. The liberal media has taken a certain stance on an issue. And the conservative media has taken a different stance on the same issue. Both sides have the right to speak on the issue how they see fit. Unfortunately for you, the liberal media is much bigger than the conservative media, so the liberal message is more visible. Same logic applies to the schools. Colleges for the most parts are run by liberal people who make institutional decisions on behalf of the college. If you disagree with the institutional decision, go to an institution that is not run by liberal people. Just like if I go to a college run by a conservative board, there will be some right-leaning institutional decisions I'll have to deal with.There is also immense anti white bias in the media where hating on whites is ok, the DNC also publicly hates on white peoplehttps://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...post1538826161and there are many college/university courses which spawn future anti white Marxists.
Originally Posted By NVious⏩
The brunt of your argument is that you disagree with liberal institutions and the ideological decisions they make. You would advocate for the federal or state government to come down on these liberal institutions, rip them of their free speech, and force your view of the world on these institutions. Just like the tranny hippie in California has no right to tell Breitbart what articles to publish, you have no right to tell MSNBC what news stories to run.I'm not going to disparage you or call you names like you have done, although if you cannot address the brunt of my argument here about the TRUTH about slavery, actual LAWS which discriminate against whites and media/leftist behavior, you have NOTHING to add to this conversation and are merely as biased as you think the other side is.
Bish Don't Kill my Vibe
12-29-2017, 08:15 PM
-
#384
12-29-2017, 08:16 PM
-
#385
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
-
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
- Posts: 34,072
- Rep Power: 206818
-
-
Originally Posted By BigPoppaPumpin⏩
A tacit admission that diversity simply means "less white people".Affirmative action isn't a law. It's an institution action. So when Harvard says we're going to have a 10% black student population, there's no law on the books that discriminates against white people (if you want to call it discrimination).Rather, Harvard has made a choice to have more racial diversity among its students.Whether you agree or not with the institution's action, you can't call it a law on the books.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."
-Hercules
Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
12-29-2017, 08:29 PM
-
#386
- BigPoppaPumpin
- Bish Be Humble
-
- BigPoppaPumpin
- Bish Be Humble
- Join Date: Oct 2015
- Posts: 2,562
- Rep Power: 804
-
-
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
Well, it sucks to have a competitive test score and get rejected, but Harvard's made the judgment that a class with a 100 white guys with perfect SAT scores is less in tune with its values than a class that is half women and 35% minority, even if the scores are lower.A tacit admission that diversity simply means "less white people".
Some people benefit from that judgment and other people don't. Just like Harvard's judgment to give a boost to kids of alumni benefits some groups and "harms" other groups.
Is a school not allowed to make that judgment?
Bish Don't Kill my Vibe
12-29-2017, 08:32 PM
-
#387
- raisedright1988
- Registered User
-
- raisedright1988
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2017
- Age: 56
- Posts: 314
- Rep Power: 190
-
-
Have you never been on twitter people call for white genocide daily. Honestly think its a joke that black people think they are more discriminated against. Not trying to be hateful either just my opinion.
12-29-2017, 08:35 PM
-
#388
- raisedright1988
- Registered User
-
- raisedright1988
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2017
- Age: 56
- Posts: 314
- Rep Power: 190
-
-
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
Truth.A tacit admission that diversity simply means "less white people".
12-29-2017, 08:41 PM
-
#389
Originally Posted By BigPoppaPumpin⏩
Posted aboveWhat about the other 50%?
What about them? Their standards of living were awful?
Would you rather be free and uncomfortable or a someone else's property and slightly more comfortable?
Depends, given the circumstances (the link looks at hard labor in different continents), I'd prefer to come to America knowing how things would turn out
Whites pay the majority of taxes and whites receive the majority of welfare. Anything poor black people do, poor white people also do. Just go to any poor white town in middle America or the south. And there are many many many more poor white people than poor black people.
What is population size? Blacks have higher rates of poverty and welfare usage. The point was about reparations which have been paid n full.
Yes, slavery still goes on today, but everyone is doing it, whites, blacks, arabs, jews, asians, hispanics.
Really? The only place slavery exists in a way that isn't massively illegal is in the middle east and Africa (not controlled by whites).
Affirmative action isn't a law. It's an institution action. So when Harvard says we're going to have a 10% black student population, there's no law on the books that discriminates against white people (if you want to call it discrimination). Rather, Harvard has made a choice to have more racial diversity among its students. Whether you agree or not with the institution's action, you can't call it a law on the books.
So if we can agree that affirmative action is an institution action, and not a law on the books. I don't think you'll disagree with me that there are many more discriminatory institutions towards black people than towards white people? I'm talking pure statistics. (eg crime, punishment, credit...)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirm...#United_States
Affirmative action was first created from Executive Order 10925, which was signed by President John F. Kennedy on 6 March 1961 and required that government employers "not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, creed, color, or national origin" and "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin".[69][70]
On 24 September 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed Executive Order 11246, thereby replacing Executive Order 10925 and affirming Federal Government's commitment "to promote the full realization of equal employment opportunity through a positive, continuing program in each executive department and agency".[3] Affirmative action was extended to women by Executive Order 11375 which amended Executive Order 11246 on 13 October 1967, by adding "sex" to the list of protected categories. In the U.S. affirmative action's original purpose was to pressure institutions into compliance with the nondiscrimination mandate of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.[15][71] The Civil Rights Acts do not cover veterans, people with disabilities, or people over 40. These groups are protected from discrimination under different laws.[72]
//
This is government force and government force in NOT allowing whites freedom of association.
If forced segregation (by government) is bad, why is forced integration good?
You'll have to quantify those claims, we do have a good example of a black run country with a white minority in South Africa, should we use that as a counter example of white v black treatment of the opposite minority?
Again this is institution action. The liberal media has taken a certain stance on an issue. And the conservative media has taken a different stance on the same issue. Both sides have the right to speak on the issue how they see fit. Unfortunately for you, the liberal media is much bigger than the conservative media, so the liberal message is more visible. Same logic applies to the schools. Colleges for the most parts are run by liberal people who make institutional decisions on behalf of the college. If you disagree with the institutional decision, go to an institution that is not run by liberal people. Just like if I go to a college run by a conservative board, there will be some right-leaning institutional decisions I'll have to deal with.
Still doesn't discount their anti white bias, there is no right with equivalent, but maybe now you want to make the freedom of association argument. Are you for total and complete freedom of association? I.e discrimination for any reason.
The brunt of your argument is that you disagree with liberal institutions and the ideological decisions they make. You would advocate for the federal or state government to come down on these liberal institutions, rip them of their free speech, and force your view of the world on these institutions. Just like the tranny hippie in California has no right to tell Breitbart what articles to publish, you have no right to tell MSNBC what news stories to run.
I don't "disagree" with them, I merely point out what they are doing.
"You would advocate for the federal or state government to come down on these liberal institutions, rip them of their free speech, and force your view of the world on these institutions."
When did I say this? Oh that's right I didn't, perhaps show a bit of decency and don't put words in my mouth or maybe you just can't help your hatred for white people and thus are taking it out on me for dropping some facts on you (oh did I just make a claim about your intentions and minset? I'm sure you won't mind since you can read my mind, I also unlocked that ability!
What about them? Their standards of living were awful?
Would you rather be free and uncomfortable or a someone else's property and slightly more comfortable?
Depends, given the circumstances (the link looks at hard labor in different continents), I'd prefer to come to America knowing how things would turn out
Whites pay the majority of taxes and whites receive the majority of welfare. Anything poor black people do, poor white people also do. Just go to any poor white town in middle America or the south. And there are many many many more poor white people than poor black people.
What is population size? Blacks have higher rates of poverty and welfare usage. The point was about reparations which have been paid n full.
Yes, slavery still goes on today, but everyone is doing it, whites, blacks, arabs, jews, asians, hispanics.
Really? The only place slavery exists in a way that isn't massively illegal is in the middle east and Africa (not controlled by whites).
Affirmative action isn't a law. It's an institution action. So when Harvard says we're going to have a 10% black student population, there's no law on the books that discriminates against white people (if you want to call it discrimination). Rather, Harvard has made a choice to have more racial diversity among its students. Whether you agree or not with the institution's action, you can't call it a law on the books.
So if we can agree that affirmative action is an institution action, and not a law on the books. I don't think you'll disagree with me that there are many more discriminatory institutions towards black people than towards white people? I'm talking pure statistics. (eg crime, punishment, credit...)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirm...#United_States
Affirmative action was first created from Executive Order 10925, which was signed by President John F. Kennedy on 6 March 1961 and required that government employers "not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, creed, color, or national origin" and "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin".[69][70]
On 24 September 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed Executive Order 11246, thereby replacing Executive Order 10925 and affirming Federal Government's commitment "to promote the full realization of equal employment opportunity through a positive, continuing program in each executive department and agency".[3] Affirmative action was extended to women by Executive Order 11375 which amended Executive Order 11246 on 13 October 1967, by adding "sex" to the list of protected categories. In the U.S. affirmative action's original purpose was to pressure institutions into compliance with the nondiscrimination mandate of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.[15][71] The Civil Rights Acts do not cover veterans, people with disabilities, or people over 40. These groups are protected from discrimination under different laws.[72]
//
This is government force and government force in NOT allowing whites freedom of association.
If forced segregation (by government) is bad, why is forced integration good?
You'll have to quantify those claims, we do have a good example of a black run country with a white minority in South Africa, should we use that as a counter example of white v black treatment of the opposite minority?
Again this is institution action. The liberal media has taken a certain stance on an issue. And the conservative media has taken a different stance on the same issue. Both sides have the right to speak on the issue how they see fit. Unfortunately for you, the liberal media is much bigger than the conservative media, so the liberal message is more visible. Same logic applies to the schools. Colleges for the most parts are run by liberal people who make institutional decisions on behalf of the college. If you disagree with the institutional decision, go to an institution that is not run by liberal people. Just like if I go to a college run by a conservative board, there will be some right-leaning institutional decisions I'll have to deal with.
Still doesn't discount their anti white bias, there is no right with equivalent, but maybe now you want to make the freedom of association argument. Are you for total and complete freedom of association? I.e discrimination for any reason.
The brunt of your argument is that you disagree with liberal institutions and the ideological decisions they make. You would advocate for the federal or state government to come down on these liberal institutions, rip them of their free speech, and force your view of the world on these institutions. Just like the tranny hippie in California has no right to tell Breitbart what articles to publish, you have no right to tell MSNBC what news stories to run.
I don't "disagree" with them, I merely point out what they are doing.
"You would advocate for the federal or state government to come down on these liberal institutions, rip them of their free speech, and force your view of the world on these institutions."
When did I say this? Oh that's right I didn't, perhaps show a bit of decency and don't put words in my mouth or maybe you just can't help your hatred for white people and thus are taking it out on me for dropping some facts on you (oh did I just make a claim about your intentions and minset? I'm sure you won't mind since you can read my mind, I also unlocked that ability!
12-29-2017, 08:41 PM
-
#390
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
-
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
- Posts: 34,072
- Rep Power: 206818
-
-
Originally Posted By BigPoppaPumpin⏩
Are you asking me if a school is allowed to discriminate based on race? Because that's exactly what you're describing, and the answer is "Yes, but only if the discrimination is against white people, Jews, or Asians, because they score higher on their SAT's, and as a result our diversity quotas aren't being met.".Well, it sucks to have a competitive test score and get rejected, but Harvard's made the judgment that a class with a 100 white guys with perfect SAT scores is less in tune with its values than a class that is half women and 35% minority, even if the scores are lower.
Some people benefit from that judgment and other people don't. Just like Harvard's judgment to give a boost to kids of alumni benefits some groups and "harms" other groups.
Is a school not allowed to make that judgment?
Some people benefit from that judgment and other people don't. Just like Harvard's judgment to give a boost to kids of alumni benefits some groups and "harms" other groups.
Is a school not allowed to make that judgment?
If meeting your diversity mandates requires either dumbing down the curriculum, or actively discriminating against perfectly qualified candidates in favor of less qualified candidates who "tick a checkbox" on a quota, and this is somehow the desired result, then you (not you specifically, speaking of Harvard in this instance) don't believe in equality of opportunity, but instead you want equality of outcome, which isn't equality at all. Meritocracy is dead under these circumstances.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."
-Hercules
Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts