Thread: Harry Potter Thread
04-16-2018, 04:48 PM
-
#31
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
-
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Age: 41
- Posts: 39,118
- Rep Power: 305683
-
-
Originally Posted By reddanak⏩
I'm enjoying it.How were you able to read the first couple books at our age? I tried a couple years ago and couldn't do it.
OLD MOVIE CREW
04-16-2018, 05:00 PM
-
#32
- TheStove123
- Registered User
-
- TheStove123
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2008
- Location: Athens, Georgia, United States
- Age: 41
- Posts: 2,134
- Rep Power: 7799
-
-
Originally Posted By reddanak⏩
I usually read autobiographies or history books, so these gave me a nice break from those. The first 2 books were good but this 3rd one is easily my favorite so farHow were you able to read the first couple books at our age? I tried a couple years ago and couldn't do it.
*ALABAMA CRIMSON TIDE*
04-16-2018, 11:56 PM
-
#33
- TinySquats
- 🍑y
-
- TinySquats
- 🍑y
- Join Date: Mar 2017
- Posts: 406
- Rep Power: 4128
-
-
Originally Posted By TheStove123⏩
The second half of that 3rd book is insane!I usually read autobiographies or history books, so these gave me a nice break from those. The first 2 books were good but this 3rd one is easily my favorite so far
04-16-2018, 11:58 PM
-
#34
04-17-2018, 12:09 AM
-
#35
- HoustonMiscer
- Registered User
-
- HoustonMiscer
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Age: 37
- Posts: 47,690
- Rep Power: 253714
-
-
I've never watched a single Harry Potter movie or read a single letter of any of the books srs. Am I missing out
Houston Sign Stealers
DEMECO RYANS HC CREW
Ugly Ass Mf Crew
Manlet Crew
Texas Crew
just be yourself
just have confidence
XOTWOD CREW
04-17-2018, 12:23 AM
-
#36
- HolyCowBatman
- Registered User
-
- HolyCowBatman
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2011
- Age: 42
- Posts: 4,039
- Rep Power: 3578
-
-
Originally Posted By HoustonMiscer⏩
definitely, particulary the part where sam reveals that suaron is actually gandalfs father and that he is the rightful heir to the iron throneI've never watched a single Harry Potter movie or read a single letter of any of the books srs. Am I missing out
*no crew* crew
04-17-2018, 12:28 AM
-
#37
- HoustonMiscer
- Registered User
-
- HoustonMiscer
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Age: 37
- Posts: 47,690
- Rep Power: 253714
-
-
Originally Posted By HolyCowBatman⏩
nice try. i know about lord of the rings and game of thrones lol good job good effort thoughdefinitely, particulary the part where sam reveals that suaron is actually gandalfs father and that he is the rightful heir to the iron throne
Houston Sign Stealers
DEMECO RYANS HC CREW
Ugly Ass Mf Crew
Manlet Crew
Texas Crew
just be yourself
just have confidence
XOTWOD CREW
04-17-2018, 12:38 AM
-
#38
- TheJediBrah
- One with the Force
-
- TheJediBrah
- One with the Force
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Posts: 15,289
- Rep Power: 25168
-
-
This thread is about 15 years too late
Who tf cares about Harry Potter anymore
Who tf cares about Harry Potter anymore
04-17-2018, 12:52 AM
-
#39
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
-
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Age: 41
- Posts: 39,118
- Rep Power: 305683
-
-
Originally Posted By TheJediBrah⏩
Slytherin alert.This thread is about 15 years too late
Who tf cares about Harry Potter anymore
Who tf cares about Harry Potter anymore
OLD MOVIE CREW
04-20-2018, 05:07 PM
-
#40
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
-
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Age: 41
- Posts: 39,118
- Rep Power: 305683
-
-
OLD MOVIE CREW
04-20-2018, 05:12 PM
-
#41
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
-
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Age: 41
- Posts: 39,118
- Rep Power: 305683
-
-
OLD MOVIE CREW
04-20-2018, 05:20 PM
-
#42
04-20-2018, 05:25 PM
-
#43
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
-
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Age: 41
- Posts: 39,118
- Rep Power: 305683
-
-
Originally Posted By chino3⏩
I've only been once to each Florida and California. But when I went to the one in California it was before Harry Potter was there.OP I know you're a fellow disneytard, but how much time do you spend at Universal? The lady and I used to go once a month or so and just chill in Hogsmeade. That place is so fuggin rad.
I'm hoping to go back to California in October to do all the Halloween stuff in the Socal parks (Disneyland/Knotts/Universal) I gotta see all Harry Potter stuff.
OLD MOVIE CREW
04-20-2018, 05:34 PM
-
#44
Originally Posted By Mr.PissShivers⏩
DO IT *******! We even got the interactive wands lulz. PM when you go and I will give you a trick on bypassing almost the entire HP line. That said, make sure you stand in the full line at least once because even that experience is srsly rad.I've only been once to each Florida and California. But when I went to the one in California it was before Harry Potter was there.
I'm hoping to go back to California in October to do all the Halloween stuff in the Socal parks (Disneyland/Knotts/Universal) I gotta see all Harry Potter stuff.
I'm hoping to go back to California in October to do all the Halloween stuff in the Socal parks (Disneyland/Knotts/Universal) I gotta see all Harry Potter stuff.
"It won't get better, just different."
04-20-2018, 05:44 PM
-
#45
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
-
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Age: 41
- Posts: 39,118
- Rep Power: 305683
-
-
Originally Posted By chino3⏩
Oh I will...sounds awesome.DO IT *******! We even got the interactive wands lulz. PM when you go and I will give you a trick on bypassing almost the entire HP line. That said, make sure you stand in the full line at least once because even that experience is srsly rad.
OLD MOVIE CREW
04-20-2018, 06:01 PM
-
#46
- Purfected
- Registered User
-
- Purfected
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2016
- Age: 34
- Posts: 5,826
- Rep Power: 22823
-
-
read all the books many multiple times. was a big harry potter fan, would just read the series, and then restart when i would finish
the first 2 movies are imo by far the best in the franchise. the first 2 capture the imagery and setting very well. in the first 2 films Hogwarts really feels like an old ancient castle that is slightly spooky where anything could ****in happen. I think the lighting in the first 2 films really brings that atmosphere to it. many scenes with flickering candles as the only lighting. its spooky and mysterious, the castle. in the later movies it completely loses that feel because each change in director changing the scenery.
not sure why but majority of people think that the 3rd film is the best, but its one of my least favourites for the following reasons.
1. it changes, and I mean completely CHANGES the appearance of multiple characters:
- Professor Flitwick goes from being an old ancient looking wizard, the Charms teacher, who was once a dueling champion in his youth (as told in the books) and they change him in to some hipster retard who conducts the school choir. you fkin
kidding me?

- Tom The Innkeeper of the Leaky Cauldron. Although he only has like 10 seconds of screen time in the first movie he is still an established character. he goes from being the old toothless barman (like described in the books) and becomes a
hunchback weazing idiot. why was he turned into a hunchbacked idiot?

- Voldemort. adding voldemort in even though he is not in the 3rd movie, but this still follows along with what i am saying about changing appearance of characters. Voldemort as you see in the first movie on the back of quirells head. he is old, he is
nasty, he is all scarred up. then when he returns in the 4th movie his face is extremely snake like. this is 1 scenario where it pisses me off at how LITERALLY they took the book reference for voldemort. I thought he looked ridiculous. looked much
spookier and nasty and mean in the first movie


2. in the first 2 films the costume design was spot on. all the random citizens you would see were dressed in their wizardry robes, and looked dignified. in the 3rd film its turned in to hipster central with people wearing ridiculous garbage.
3. all of the humour starting from 3 and onwards seems SO FORCED. can't stand when the humour in a movie seems that way. it's like the people making the movie think people watching are too retarded to understand subtle jokes, instead they have to present it at you in a way that says "look this is a joke this is where you laugh HAHAH!"
Another reason why the first 2 films are the best. although the series is suppose to get "darker" as the series goes on and the characters get older, I call bullchit on that. nothing in the remaining films even compares to the dark spooky feeling of the forbidden forest scenes, from the first 2 films. remember the scene where harry stumbled across that human like thing drinking the dead unicorns blood and then flies away?
or the scene in the 2nd movie where mrs. norris gets petrified and everyone see's the blood written on the wall.
the first 2 movies are imo by far the best in the franchise. the first 2 capture the imagery and setting very well. in the first 2 films Hogwarts really feels like an old ancient castle that is slightly spooky where anything could ****in happen. I think the lighting in the first 2 films really brings that atmosphere to it. many scenes with flickering candles as the only lighting. its spooky and mysterious, the castle. in the later movies it completely loses that feel because each change in director changing the scenery.
not sure why but majority of people think that the 3rd film is the best, but its one of my least favourites for the following reasons.
1. it changes, and I mean completely CHANGES the appearance of multiple characters:
- Professor Flitwick goes from being an old ancient looking wizard, the Charms teacher, who was once a dueling champion in his youth (as told in the books) and they change him in to some hipster retard who conducts the school choir. you fkin
kidding me?

- Tom The Innkeeper of the Leaky Cauldron. Although he only has like 10 seconds of screen time in the first movie he is still an established character. he goes from being the old toothless barman (like described in the books) and becomes a
hunchback weazing idiot. why was he turned into a hunchbacked idiot?

- Voldemort. adding voldemort in even though he is not in the 3rd movie, but this still follows along with what i am saying about changing appearance of characters. Voldemort as you see in the first movie on the back of quirells head. he is old, he is
nasty, he is all scarred up. then when he returns in the 4th movie his face is extremely snake like. this is 1 scenario where it pisses me off at how LITERALLY they took the book reference for voldemort. I thought he looked ridiculous. looked much
spookier and nasty and mean in the first movie


2. in the first 2 films the costume design was spot on. all the random citizens you would see were dressed in their wizardry robes, and looked dignified. in the 3rd film its turned in to hipster central with people wearing ridiculous garbage.
3. all of the humour starting from 3 and onwards seems SO FORCED. can't stand when the humour in a movie seems that way. it's like the people making the movie think people watching are too retarded to understand subtle jokes, instead they have to present it at you in a way that says "look this is a joke this is where you laugh HAHAH!"
Another reason why the first 2 films are the best. although the series is suppose to get "darker" as the series goes on and the characters get older, I call bullchit on that. nothing in the remaining films even compares to the dark spooky feeling of the forbidden forest scenes, from the first 2 films. remember the scene where harry stumbled across that human like thing drinking the dead unicorns blood and then flies away?
or the scene in the 2nd movie where mrs. norris gets petrified and everyone see's the blood written on the wall.
Yellow Fever Crew
Never Lost a Streetfight Crew
J-Drama Crew/
Hana Yori Dango Fanclub Crew
Boxing Crew
04-20-2018, 07:04 PM
-
#47
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
-
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Age: 41
- Posts: 39,118
- Rep Power: 305683
-
-
It was weird that they changed what was already established....Didn't like that either.
OLD MOVIE CREW
04-21-2018, 09:28 PM
-
#48
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
-
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Age: 41
- Posts: 39,118
- Rep Power: 305683
-
-
Anyone seen this?
OLD MOVIE CREW
04-23-2018, 09:17 PM
-
#49
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
-
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Age: 41
- Posts: 39,118
- Rep Power: 305683
-
-
Love the way he says "equally guilty" at 1:20
OLD MOVIE CREW
04-30-2018, 06:13 PM
-
#50
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
-
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Age: 41
- Posts: 39,118
- Rep Power: 305683
-
-
OLD MOVIE CREW
04-30-2018, 06:16 PM
-
#51
04-30-2018, 06:19 PM
-
#52
- ImnotNatty
- Banned
-
- ImnotNatty
- Banned
- Join Date: Apr 2017
- Location: France
- Age: 26
- Posts: 968
- Rep Power: 0
-
-

04-30-2018, 06:21 PM
-
#53
- ImnotNatty
- Banned
-
- ImnotNatty
- Banned
- Join Date: Apr 2017
- Location: France
- Age: 26
- Posts: 968
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Btw always loved Harry Potter read and seen the film at least 10 times each I think I always prefered it to Lord Of The Ring lore, great universes, characters and fanbase!
04-30-2018, 06:26 PM
-
#54
- exxtracool
- Registered User
-
- exxtracool
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2018
- Location: Canada
- Age: 34
- Posts: 20,766
- Rep Power: 77972
-
-
I just downloaded goblet of fire.
Gonna watch all of them. Haven’t seen them aside from the frist 3 back when I was a kid.
Gonna watch all of them. Haven’t seen them aside from the frist 3 back when I was a kid.
04-30-2018, 06:35 PM
-
#55
04-30-2018, 06:39 PM
-
#56
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
-
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Age: 41
- Posts: 39,118
- Rep Power: 305683
-
-
Originally Posted By Vhagar⏩
About halfway through the first.Where you at now
I’m halfway through order of the Phoenix
I’m halfway through order of the Phoenix
Problem for me is that I normally read at night before bed, and I've been getting super tired lately and falling asleep faster than normal so I've been getting less reading done.
OLD MOVIE CREW
04-30-2018, 07:10 PM
-
#57
Originally Posted By Mr.PissShivers⏩
PatheticAbout halfway through the first.
Problem for me is that I normally read at night before bed, and I've been getting super tired lately and falling asleep faster than normal so I've been getting less reading done.
Problem for me is that I normally read at night before bed, and I've been getting super tired lately and falling asleep faster than normal so I've been getting less reading done.
04-30-2018, 07:59 PM
-
#58
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
-
- Mr.PissShivers
- Shiverin' since '92
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Age: 41
- Posts: 39,118
- Rep Power: 305683
-
-
Originally Posted By Vhagar⏩
Maybe I need to start reading earlier.Pathetic
Bout to start watching the movies again though....lol
OLD MOVIE CREW
04-30-2018, 10:00 PM
-
#59
- Jizmeister
- Registered User
-
- Jizmeister
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Age: 34
- Posts: 6,283
- Rep Power: 7310
-
-
Originally Posted By TheStove123⏩
6th is best IMO. The story doesn’t even get going until book 5.I usually read autobiographies or history books, so these gave me a nice break from those. The first 2 books were good but this 3rd one is easily my favorite so far
Traditional Wetshaver Crew
* KNEE DRAGGERS UNITE *
MFC
04-30-2018, 10:04 PM
-
#60
- Jizmeister
- Registered User
-
- Jizmeister
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Age: 34
- Posts: 6,283
- Rep Power: 7310
-
-
Originally Posted By Purfected⏩
Absolutely agree with this.read all the books many multiple times. was a big harry potter fan, would just read the series, and then restart when i would finish
the first 2 movies are imo by far the best in the franchise. the first 2 capture the imagery and setting very well. in the first 2 films Hogwarts really feels like an old ancient castle that is slightly spooky where anything could ****in happen. I think the lighting in the first 2 films really brings that atmosphere to it. many scenes with flickering candles as the only lighting. its spooky and mysterious, the castle. in the later movies it completely loses that feel because each change in director changing the scenery.
not sure why but majority of people think that the 3rd film is the best, but its one of my least favourites for the following reasons.
1. it changes, and I mean completely CHANGES the appearance of multiple characters:
- Professor Flitwick goes from being an old ancient looking wizard, the Charms teacher, who was once a dueling champion in his youth (as told in the books) and they change him in to some hipster retard who conducts the school choir. you fkin
kidding me?

- Tom The Innkeeper of the Leaky Cauldron. Although he only has like 10 seconds of screen time in the first movie he is still an established character. he goes from being the old toothless barman (like described in the books) and becomes a
hunchback weazing idiot. why was he turned into a hunchbacked idiot?

- Voldemort. adding voldemort in even though he is not in the 3rd movie, but this still follows along with what i am saying about changing appearance of characters. Voldemort as you see in the first movie on the back of quirells head. he is old, he is
nasty, he is all scarred up. then when he returns in the 4th movie his face is extremely snake like. this is 1 scenario where it pisses me off at how LITERALLY they took the book reference for voldemort. I thought he looked ridiculous. looked much
spookier and nasty and mean in the first movie


2. in the first 2 films the costume design was spot on. all the random citizens you would see were dressed in their wizardry robes, and looked dignified. in the 3rd film its turned in to hipster central with people wearing ridiculous garbage.
3. all of the humour starting from 3 and onwards seems SO FORCED. can't stand when the humour in a movie seems that way. it's like the people making the movie think people watching are too retarded to understand subtle jokes, instead they have to present it at you in a way that says "look this is a joke this is where you laugh HAHAH!"
Another reason why the first 2 films are the best. although the series is suppose to get "darker" as the series goes on and the characters get older, I call bullchit on that. nothing in the remaining films even compares to the dark spooky feeling of the forbidden forest scenes, from the first 2 films. remember the scene where harry stumbled across that human like thing drinking the dead unicorns blood and then flies away?
or the scene in the 2nd movie where mrs. norris gets petrified and everyone see's the blood written on the wall.
the first 2 movies are imo by far the best in the franchise. the first 2 capture the imagery and setting very well. in the first 2 films Hogwarts really feels like an old ancient castle that is slightly spooky where anything could ****in happen. I think the lighting in the first 2 films really brings that atmosphere to it. many scenes with flickering candles as the only lighting. its spooky and mysterious, the castle. in the later movies it completely loses that feel because each change in director changing the scenery.
not sure why but majority of people think that the 3rd film is the best, but its one of my least favourites for the following reasons.
1. it changes, and I mean completely CHANGES the appearance of multiple characters:
- Professor Flitwick goes from being an old ancient looking wizard, the Charms teacher, who was once a dueling champion in his youth (as told in the books) and they change him in to some hipster retard who conducts the school choir. you fkin
kidding me?

- Tom The Innkeeper of the Leaky Cauldron. Although he only has like 10 seconds of screen time in the first movie he is still an established character. he goes from being the old toothless barman (like described in the books) and becomes a
hunchback weazing idiot. why was he turned into a hunchbacked idiot?

- Voldemort. adding voldemort in even though he is not in the 3rd movie, but this still follows along with what i am saying about changing appearance of characters. Voldemort as you see in the first movie on the back of quirells head. he is old, he is
nasty, he is all scarred up. then when he returns in the 4th movie his face is extremely snake like. this is 1 scenario where it pisses me off at how LITERALLY they took the book reference for voldemort. I thought he looked ridiculous. looked much
spookier and nasty and mean in the first movie


2. in the first 2 films the costume design was spot on. all the random citizens you would see were dressed in their wizardry robes, and looked dignified. in the 3rd film its turned in to hipster central with people wearing ridiculous garbage.
3. all of the humour starting from 3 and onwards seems SO FORCED. can't stand when the humour in a movie seems that way. it's like the people making the movie think people watching are too retarded to understand subtle jokes, instead they have to present it at you in a way that says "look this is a joke this is where you laugh HAHAH!"
Another reason why the first 2 films are the best. although the series is suppose to get "darker" as the series goes on and the characters get older, I call bullchit on that. nothing in the remaining films even compares to the dark spooky feeling of the forbidden forest scenes, from the first 2 films. remember the scene where harry stumbled across that human like thing drinking the dead unicorns blood and then flies away?
or the scene in the 2nd movie where mrs. norris gets petrified and everyone see's the blood written on the wall.
If Chris Columbus had directed all 8 and Richard Harris been Dumbledore for all 8, it would have been GOAT
Traditional Wetshaver Crew
* KNEE DRAGGERS UNITE *
MFC
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts