Forum
»
You press button you get 1 mil. the catch: 1 random person somewhere dies
07-25-2018, 09:42 AM
-
#61
- northernlights7
- Banned
-
- northernlights7
- Banned
- Join Date: Jun 2013
- Posts: 24,527
- Rep Power: 24
-
-
Assuming there was a guarantee that no one of any importance to that person in any way (family, friends, leaders of their country/area, etc.), 95% of people would hit that million dollar button 10+ times, or a lot more based on what happens in the heat of the moment.
It all depends on how you justify it, but let's say you hit the button 100x for 100 million dollars. So 100 random people instantly dead. If you kept half and donated the other 50 million to reputable charities within your state/province, there's a legitimate argument to be made that you'd be doing far more good than bad despite shelfishly keeping 50 million.
It all depends on how you justify it, but let's say you hit the button 100x for 100 million dollars. So 100 random people instantly dead. If you kept half and donated the other 50 million to reputable charities within your state/province, there's a legitimate argument to be made that you'd be doing far more good than bad despite shelfishly keeping 50 million.
07-25-2018, 09:47 AM
-
#62
07-25-2018, 09:49 AM
-
#63
- wisdommaster1
- Registered User
-
- wisdommaster1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2006
- Location: San Francisco, California, United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 18,637
- Rep Power: 44944
-
-
Originally Posted By reverse79⏩
then I just keep pressing the button until she dies too0you live with blood on your hands for the rest of your life. Karma gonna get yo ass
Originally Posted By northernlights7⏩
they never said where the million comes from.... maybe it just gets taken from poor peopleAssuming there was a guarantee that no one of any importance to that person in any way (family, friends, leaders of their country/area, etc.), 95% of people would hit that million dollar button 10+ times, or a lot more based on what happens in the heat of the moment.
It all depends on how you justify it, but let's say you hit the button 100x for 100 million dollars. So 100 random people instantly dead. If you kept half and donated the other 50 million to reputable charities within your state/province, there's a legitimate argument to be made that you'd be doing far more good than bad despite shelfishly keeping 50 million.
It all depends on how you justify it, but let's say you hit the button 100x for 100 million dollars. So 100 random people instantly dead. If you kept half and donated the other 50 million to reputable charities within your state/province, there's a legitimate argument to be made that you'd be doing far more good than bad despite shelfishly keeping 50 million.
The Secret the 1% DONT WANT YOU TO KNOW?! Click HERE to find out more
07-25-2018, 09:52 AM
-
#64
- jacemano
- REEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeee
-
- jacemano
- REEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeee
- Join Date: Apr 2017
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 2,401
- Rep Power: 9336
-
-
Originally Posted By Chezdon⏩
You're worse than most dictators then.At least make it interesting. Less money/more people.
I'd kill a million people for $20,000,000 easily.
I'd kill a million people for $20,000,000 easily.
I mean a million people has to be worth a few 100 mil surely. I can understand genocide for 100 million, 20 though is too little.
Lifting on hiatus, triathlon training everydayyyy
HTC, don't @ me
07-25-2018, 10:00 AM
-
#65
- Better Unborn
- ♔ King Rotter ♔
-
- Better Unborn
- ♔ King Rotter ♔
- Join Date: Aug 2003
- Location: United States
- Posts: 26,485
- Rep Power: 181877
-
-
CEO 10 mil/day checkin in
(__Y__) Misc Buck Breaker (__Y__)
( o Y o ) Milk Wagon Engineer ( o Y o )
~@( Official Youthful Glow Connoisseur )@~
07-25-2018, 10:01 AM
-
#66
- ChairmanWaffle
- Registered User
-
- ChairmanWaffle
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2018
- Age: 42
- Posts: 525
- Rep Power: 957
-
-
Moral answer, perhaps?
It costs about $3500 to save a human life, per some non-profits, if the money is used wisely. So if you press once, you lose a random life, and save 1000000/3500= 286 people with that money, for a net 285 saved.
Since you have now saved the most cheaply saved people, the next group will cost more to save (not to mention some slight inflationary effect of this newly created $1mm.) Maybe $3510. So now $1mm only saved 285 people, less the one lost, for a net of 284.
Repeat until it costs $1mm to save a single person.
You can save a lot of people.
It costs about $3500 to save a human life, per some non-profits, if the money is used wisely. So if you press once, you lose a random life, and save 1000000/3500= 286 people with that money, for a net 285 saved.
Since you have now saved the most cheaply saved people, the next group will cost more to save (not to mention some slight inflationary effect of this newly created $1mm.) Maybe $3510. So now $1mm only saved 285 people, less the one lost, for a net of 284.
Repeat until it costs $1mm to save a single person.
You can save a lot of people.
07-25-2018, 10:19 AM
-
#67
- propreffered7
- Registered User
-
- propreffered7
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Posts: 36,839
- Rep Power: 86393
-
-
Think i used to be the guy that said i wouldnt do it
Knowing miscers. I prob would
Prob once though
Knowing miscers. I prob would
Prob once though
07-25-2018, 10:36 AM
-
#68
- Chezdon
- Vagabond
-
- Chezdon
- Vagabond
- Join Date: Feb 2010
- Location: London, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 40
- Posts: 13,184
- Rep Power: 13479
-
-
Originally Posted By jacemano⏩
Ah well. 100,000,000 China men could die and I wouldn't bat an eyelid. $20m would give me and my family a work-free life. Pretty easy trade.You're worse than most dictators then.
I mean a million people has to be worth a few 100 mil surely. I can understand genocide for 100 million, 20 though is too little.
I mean a million people has to be worth a few 100 mil surely. I can understand genocide for 100 million, 20 though is too little.
07-25-2018, 10:41 AM
-
#69
07-25-2018, 10:47 AM
-
#70
07-25-2018, 10:48 AM
-
#71
07-25-2018, 10:55 AM
-
#72
- skinnyfat88
- Registered User
-
- skinnyfat88
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2014
- Location: Canada
- Age: 38
- Posts: 6,718
- Rep Power: 27255
-
-
Would contemplate if the 1mil was needed to save the life of someone I knew but most of the people's lives I'd wanna save in order to spare a random life could probably come up with the money needed w/o the help of the button.
Not sure what kinda medical procedure you need 1mil in cash for though.
Not sure what kinda medical procedure you need 1mil in cash for though.
07-25-2018, 10:59 AM
-
#73
07-25-2018, 11:10 AM
-
#74
07-25-2018, 11:12 AM
-
#75
- devin45k
- Segabrah
-
- devin45k
- Segabrah
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: United States
- Posts: 32,255
- Rep Power: 213481
-
-
The planet has way too many people already. So technically I would be helping others by lowering the population by one.
NDSU Crew
Kansas City Royals Crew
Winnipeg Blue Bombers Crew
Over the Top is the GOAT Movie Crew
HTC 4 life brother!!!
"If you don't have skid marks on your underwear after a leg workout, then you aren't training hard enough" - Big Lenny
07-25-2018, 11:15 AM
-
#76
- MakeItMatt
- Registered User
-
- MakeItMatt
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2016
- Age: 28
- Posts: 1,388
- Rep Power: 9311
-
-
There's a chance that it kills someone who is in extreme pain whether through illness or other means, so out of the goodness of my heart I'd press it probably 100 times. The chance it gets someone in my family is probably less a chance than winning the lottery, so nothing to worry about.
07-25-2018, 11:21 AM
-
#77
- nvrstopworking
- brb bulk-utting!
-
- nvrstopworking
- brb bulk-utting!
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Posts: 34,961
- Rep Power: 88658
-
-
Nice try OP but everyone knows that the Misc is full of socio/psychopaths with little regard for human life. They’d press that button til their fingers broke.
Let’s try this one.... someone offers you $1M to shoot your dog (no one else knows about it... just you and the shooter... and your dog will die 100%). Do you say yes?
Let’s try this one.... someone offers you $1M to shoot your dog (no one else knows about it... just you and the shooter... and your dog will die 100%). Do you say yes?
07-25-2018, 11:24 AM
-
#78
Originally Posted By nvrstopworking⏩
That’s not even kind of comparableNice try OP but everyone knows that the Misc is full of socio/psychopaths with little regard for human life. They’d press that button til their fingers broke.
Let’s try this one.... someone offers you $1M to shoot your dog (no one else knows about it... just you and the shooter... and your dog will die 100%). Do you say yes?
Let’s try this one.... someone offers you $1M to shoot your dog (no one else knows about it... just you and the shooter... and your dog will die 100%). Do you say yes?
07-25-2018, 11:26 AM
-
#79
- GolfPants
- Registered Miscer
-
- GolfPants
- Registered Miscer
- Join Date: Jul 2008
- Posts: 16,671
- Rep Power: 70847
-
-
Originally Posted By nvrstopworking⏩
Can I keep buying more dogs and shooting them and collecting $1m each time?Let’s try this one.... someone offers you $1M to shoot your dog (no one else knows about it... just you and the shooter... and your dog will die 100%). Do you say yes?
I call it "Celebration". It's sexual, and violent...
New Jersey Crew (732)
07-25-2018, 11:27 AM
-
#80
- Aesthetical
- Truth Teller
-
- Aesthetical
- Truth Teller
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: United States
- Posts: 20,985
- Rep Power: 53117
-
-
I would hit it 5-10 times I think.
Would probably do some math first and figure out how much I would need to have a nice plot of land and home fully paid and then see how much would be needed to stay invested so dividends could be my income source for $100k+/year.
Would probably do some math first and figure out how much I would need to have a nice plot of land and home fully paid and then see how much would be needed to stay invested so dividends could be my income source for $100k+/year.
PUBG - X1
xX nRAG3D Xx
MCC Crew: WTC crew
07-25-2018, 11:31 AM
-
#81
07-25-2018, 11:31 AM
-
#82
07-25-2018, 11:31 AM
-
#83
- NuggzTheNinja
- Exotic Game Hunter
-
- NuggzTheNinja
- Exotic Game Hunter
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Posts: 31,871
- Rep Power: 237953
-
-
Once, then spend the money to hire an engineer to build me a robot arm to press it 7 billion more times while I travel the world to check on the progress.
This account was created for the purpose of roleplaying and satire. All posts, messages, images, or other media produced by this Bodybuilding.com profile, including stories, names, references to characters and incidents, and views expressed, are fictitious and intended as parody. No identification or association with actual persons (living or deceased), places, buildings, or products is intended or should be inferred.
07-25-2018, 11:34 AM
-
#84
Originally Posted By ChairmanWaffle⏩
Yeah im sure the father of a girl he was tucking in bed at night and randomly died in front of his eyes is grateful that you saved some random african kid. Im sure he gets your moral compassMoral answer, perhaps?
It costs about $3500 to save a human life, per some non-profits, if the money is used wisely. So if you press once, you lose a random life, and save 1000000/3500= 286 people with that money, for a net 285 saved.
Since you have now saved the most cheaply saved people, the next group will cost more to save (not to mention some slight inflationary effect of this newly created $1mm.) Maybe $3510. So now $1mm only saved 285 people, less the one lost, for a net of 284.
Repeat until it costs $1mm to save a single person.
You can save a lot of people.
It costs about $3500 to save a human life, per some non-profits, if the money is used wisely. So if you press once, you lose a random life, and save 1000000/3500= 286 people with that money, for a net 285 saved.
Since you have now saved the most cheaply saved people, the next group will cost more to save (not to mention some slight inflationary effect of this newly created $1mm.) Maybe $3510. So now $1mm only saved 285 people, less the one lost, for a net of 284.
Repeat until it costs $1mm to save a single person.
You can save a lot of people.
07-25-2018, 11:36 AM
-
#85
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By ChairmanWaffle⏩
Not exactly the most convincing moral argument- killing someone and using their resources to save multiple others. Consider the analogy:Moral answer, perhaps?
It costs about $3500 to save a human life, per some non-profits, if the money is used wisely. So if you press once, you lose a random life, and save 1000000/3500= 286 people with that money, for a net 285 saved.
Since you have now saved the most cheaply saved people, the next group will cost more to save (not to mention some slight inflationary effect of this newly created $1mm.) Maybe $3510. So now $1mm only saved 285 people, less the one lost, for a net of 284.
Repeat until it costs $1mm to save a single person.
You can save a lot of people.
It costs about $3500 to save a human life, per some non-profits, if the money is used wisely. So if you press once, you lose a random life, and save 1000000/3500= 286 people with that money, for a net 285 saved.
Since you have now saved the most cheaply saved people, the next group will cost more to save (not to mention some slight inflationary effect of this newly created $1mm.) Maybe $3510. So now $1mm only saved 285 people, less the one lost, for a net of 284.
Repeat until it costs $1mm to save a single person.
You can save a lot of people.
A doctor has 6 patients lying on their death beds, each with a specific organ that is failing (one has a failing heart, one has a failing liver, two have failing kidneys, and two have failing lungs). Is it moral for the doctor to just take one healthy human (say perhaps, you), and kill you, and use each of your 6 organs to save the other 6 people? lol don't think many would agree this is a moral action, and society clearly doesn't think so either (laws).
Some thoughts on the OP:
-Not surprisingly like 95% of the misc seems to want to eagerly press the button. How many of these are self-proclaimed Christians I wonder, hmm. Must not really be that confident in that afterlife heaven vs. hell, because if pushing the button means going to hell, you would have a much, much bigger incentive to not press it.
-I wonder if the amount of people saying press the button would change if, instead of simply pressing the button, you had to literally kill a random stranger walking in the street carrying a briefcase of $1 Mil (with the assumption wouldn't get hurt or caught)- which is really an equivalent scenario, but a little "closer to the action", and I wonder if this would change anything.
-If you believe in strict determinism, it doesn't matter whether you decide to press the button, because you have no choice really. Whether you press that button is simply the result of physical states in the neurons/atoms in your brain etc, it's just a built-in property of the universe.
-It would be deeply ironic if the person hitting the button hit that 1 in 7 billion chance and immediately died when hitting it the first time. The end.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
07-25-2018, 11:42 AM
-
#86
- MyGhettoFantasy
- Registered User
-
- MyGhettoFantasy
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2016
- Age: 42
- Posts: 12,838
- Rep Power: 162504
-
-
Nah I'm sweet
The closer we approach the uncertainty of life's ending the more we wish to trade all of the things we have acquired in exchange for all of the things we have lost: wealth for youth, knowledge for fresh curiosity, resignation for hope. We'd trade our wisdom for new experiences, but it is wisdom that will teach us that at the end of the road the only new experience is death.
07-25-2018, 11:43 AM
-
#87
- greedyfly13
- Temporarily Not Banned
-
- greedyfly13
- Temporarily Not Banned
- Join Date: Mar 2011
- Posts: 2,309
- Rep Power: 2025
-
-
what if instead of one person dies, one person gets tortured in the most extreme pain possible for all of eternity? you ****s still press?
07-25-2018, 11:45 AM
-
#88
- amikaelmorris
- drink more water
-
- amikaelmorris
- drink more water
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: Vista, California, United States
- Posts: 27,540
- Rep Power: 88893
-
-
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
well, fukin, obviously. anonymously pushing a button is complete detachment from it and that's the point-I wonder if the amount of people saying press the button would change if, instead of simply pressing the button, you had to literally kill a random stranger walking in the street carrying a briefcase of $1 Mil (with the assumption wouldn't get caught)- which is really an equivalent scenario, but a litte "closer to the action", and I wonder if this would change anything.
knowing myself i couldn't live with the guilt so i'd probably press it 10 times or something, go do what i want to do for a while, give the rest to family and off myself
07-25-2018, 11:46 AM
-
#89
- ralphlaurenbrah
- Registered User
-
- ralphlaurenbrah
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2013
- Age: 36
- Posts: 10,357
- Rep Power: 31773
-
-
Should have made a poll. 20-100. The world is overpopulated as ****. As long as it's a painless death I would do it.
07-25-2018, 11:48 AM
-
#90
- nvrstopworking
- brb bulk-utting!
-
- nvrstopworking
- brb bulk-utting!
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Posts: 34,961
- Rep Power: 88658
-
-
Originally Posted By GolfPants⏩
Can’t be some random dog. Has to be yours and you have to have had him for at least 5 years. So if you want to do it every 5 years? Sure.Can I keep buying more dogs and shooting them and collecting $1m each time?
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts