A thread on Q's most recent posts [Something Big Is About To Drop]

07-31-2018, 07:16 AM

-

#271

Seatard

Seatard

Join Date: Sep 2012

Posts: 19,154

Subscribers: 3

Rep Power: 98572

Today must be the day!!!!

R-r-right bros? Today is big something day?

07-31-2018, 07:22 AM

-

#272

ichBinBerliner
Banned

ichBinBerliner
Banned

Join Date: Jun 2010

Posts: 3,652

Rep Power: 0

Originally Posted By Seatard⏩

Today must be the day!!!!

R-r-right bros? Today is big something day?

Well I did take a huge dump today.

07-31-2018, 07:23 AM

-

#273

rampagefc77
Registered User

rampagefc77
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2006

Age: 39

Posts: 20,625

Rep Power: 153167

Originally Posted By Seatard⏩

Today must be the day!!!!

R-r-right bros? Today is big something day?

Nobody predicts days.

It would be like your bunch trying to predict the day that Trump is going to be indicted. If you follow CNN and MSM, it's any day now!!!!111

What you don't realize is everything you mock in this thread, you are guilty of yourself, you just don't see it.

07-31-2018, 07:48 AM

-

#274

Seatard

Seatard

Join Date: Sep 2012

Posts: 19,154

Subscribers: 3

Rep Power: 98572

Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩

Nobody predicts days.

It would be like your bunch trying to predict the day that Trump is going to be indicted. If you follow CNN and MSM, it's any day now!!!!111

What you don't realize is everything you mock in this thread, you are guilty of yourself, you just don't see it.

I don't think Trump is going to be indicted though. Ever. He'll probably win a second term.

I also think Trump sucks at leading.

I don't know what any of that has to do with the impending big something.

07-31-2018, 07:53 AM

-

#275

~Hades~
True Patriot Crew

~Hades~
True Patriot Crew

Join Date: Dec 2007

Posts: 26,187

Rep Power: 695527

Originally Posted By SWORN⏩

Why troll in a serious thread? If you disagree with something make a case. No need to make comments like a child.

It’s a free bump to the top every time so free Q advertising

Royal Crew
Chiefs Crew
Festivus Cew

07-31-2018, 08:02 AM

-

#276

Seatard

Seatard

Join Date: Sep 2012

Posts: 19,154

Subscribers: 3

Rep Power: 98572

Originally Posted By ~Hades~⏩

It’s a free bump to the top every time so free Q advertising

Gotta keep the thread alive to keep the fantasy alive broseph.

07-31-2018, 08:49 AM

-

#277

StoliFun
Osawatomie John Brown

StoliFun
Osawatomie John Brown

Join Date: May 2010

Location: Cypress, Texas, United States

Posts: 27,372

Rep Power: 271790

Originally Posted By Seatard⏩

Gotta keep the thread alive to keep the fantasy alive broseph.

Crank up the crazy and rip off the knob.

Heterologously Vaccinated Superior Race Crew

Kurt Russell, Ray Winstone, Mickey Rourke Crew

"The dominant economic order rests on unofficial dependency and official individualism. Survival requires the transposition of these two ideas: official solidarity and unofficial individualism."

07-31-2018, 10:13 AM

-

#278

rampagefc77
Registered User

rampagefc77
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2006

Age: 39

Posts: 20,625

Rep Power: 153167

Originally Posted By StoliFun⏩

Crank up the crazy and rip off the knob.

Time will tell.

We know that MSM has been wrong on countless occasions, or incredibly biased to the point of being inaccurate on several occasions... but we still follow and trust them?

Q is another narrative that may or may not be right. It's worth following for entertainment if nothing else.

Nobody knows if/when something big will drop, but if this person really is a troll with too much time on their hands that just so happens to have access to authentic surveillance imaging, etc... The number one way to lose your entire following is to string a group along for 10 months, then claim something big is going to happen... and then nothing happens in a timely manner. It would be far more useful to the movement to claim that Rosenstein and the DOJ are stonewalling, it will take longer for intel to be released, etc. That riles up the crowd and gives the troll more time.

Give it a couple weeks and see if anything happens.

07-31-2018, 02:19 PM

-

#279

z4v4
SillieBazzillie Alt #z4

z4v4
SillieBazzillie Alt #z4

Join Date: May 2017

Posts: 41,412

Rep Power: 82451

Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩

Time will tell.

We know that MSM has been wrong on countless occasions, or incredibly biased to the point of being inaccurate on several occasions... but we still follow and trust them?

Q is another narrative that may or may not be right. It's worth following for entertainment if nothing else.

Nobody knows if/when something big will drop, but if this person really is a troll with too much time on their hands that just so happens to have access to authentic surveillance imaging, etc... The number one way to lose your entire following is to string a group along for 10 months, then claim something big is going to happen... and then nothing happens in a timely manner. It would be far more useful to the movement to claim that Rosenstein and the DOJ are stonewalling, it will take longer for intel to be released, etc. That riles up the crowd and gives the troll more time.

Give it a couple weeks and see if anything happens.

Please... you guys will just change the definition of the word big rather than admit Q is just psyop.

Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."

z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"

Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."

z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?

Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."

07-31-2018, 02:24 PM

-

#280

BlackJack619
Registered User

BlackJack619
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2012

Location: United States

Posts: 17,066

Rep Power: 143443

Originally Posted By z4v4⏩

Please... you guys will just change the definition of the word big rather than admit Q is just psyop.

You guys?

As

07-31-2018, 02:26 PM

-

#281

z4v4
SillieBazzillie Alt #z4

z4v4
SillieBazzillie Alt #z4

Join Date: May 2017

Posts: 41,412

Rep Power: 82451

Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩

You guys?

Yes.

Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."

z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"

Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."

z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?

Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."

07-31-2018, 02:27 PM

-

#282

BlackJack619
Registered User

BlackJack619
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2012

Location: United States

Posts: 17,066

Rep Power: 143443

Originally Posted By z4v4⏩

Yes.

the Truth will set you free
Seek it out, and you will find it.

As

07-31-2018, 02:33 PM

-

#283

z4v4
SillieBazzillie Alt #z4

z4v4
SillieBazzillie Alt #z4

Join Date: May 2017

Posts: 41,412

Rep Power: 82451

Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩

the Truth will set you free
Seek it out, and you will find it.

You should consider following that advice yourself.

Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."

z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"

Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."

z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?

Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."

07-31-2018, 02:35 PM

-

#284

BlackJack619
Registered User

BlackJack619
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2012

Location: United States

Posts: 17,066

Rep Power: 143443

Originally Posted By z4v4⏩

You should consider following that advice yourself.

totally.

As

07-31-2018, 02:45 PM

-

#285

Reflexez
bad_Liberal_Man

Reflexez
bad_Liberal_Man

Join Date: Dec 2011

Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)

Posts: 5,292

Rep Power: 28445

Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩

People asked why don’t they just kill him, I gave multiple plausible answers. What more do you want? I don’t claim to be an expert. As I said, I follow Q. I don’t sit on every word. Q has proven enough over the last 10 months to prove they are worth following. There are a lot of crazy things going on in the world, and the MSM narrative doesn’t explain it.

I personally disagree that they're plausible, but that's opinions.

I'd just like some actual proof of something(s) which were said would happen and then did and prove that there's a deep state or whatever else people are claiming.

For me it's very simple, I want my facts to be watertight not some tenuous link where Q said something like "something big is coming" and then some random event happens like FB stocks drop and everyone goes "OMG that must have been what was meant", because you can twist any major event to fitting in the box of "something big".

I also want a time frame, how long can you keep saying "something big is coming" before it's not? All this does is buy time for an event to happen which could be claimed as what was being referred to, in the world of politics if you string something out for 1-2 months then there's bound to be a major news story which breaks and then suddenly all the followers claim this was what was coming all along.

Which leads us onto, I want to know what is coming. Why are descriptions so vague? Why do people have to work out the story themselves? Lets assume Q has inside info and knows something like, 100 top actors are about to be arrested for molesting kids in the 80's. If they are happy to leak enough info that followers can "work it out" then why can the deep state and all these other shadow organisations not work it out as well, are we assuming that figures who run the world in secret have no-one working for them who's intelligent enough to decipher these messages but some random joe can and make a youtube video on it? So logically there's no reason to not drop actual facts of what's going on, but of course this is essentially what mediums do while cold reading, they throw out something vague enough that people can latch onto it and create the story themselves. If Q said "In the next month Hollywood is going to be rocked with scandals and people arrested for crimes against children" then when it doesn't happen everyone knows it's a load of bullshyt however if it's something like "Something is coming, people did evil things, they will pay" then there's no link to who, how many, what was done, etc. so you have morons sharing tweets of 1 person making a random claim against someone else and in their head this is "proof Q was right!".

Current ShareBlue earnings: $103,587.99

Certified deb00nker & corrector of the record.

07-31-2018, 02:48 PM

-

#286

StoliFun
Osawatomie John Brown

StoliFun
Osawatomie John Brown

Join Date: May 2010

Location: Cypress, Texas, United States

Posts: 27,372

Rep Power: 271790

Originally Posted By Reflexez⏩

I personally disagree that they're plausible, but that's opinions.

I'd just like some actual proof of something(s) which were said would happen and then did and prove that there's a deep state or whatever else people are claiming.

For me it's very simple, I want my facts to be watertight not some tenuous link where Q said something like "something big is coming" and then some random event happens like FB stocks drop and everyone goes "OMG that must have been what was meant", because you can twist any major event to fitting in the box of "something big".

I also want a time frame, how long can you keep saying "something big is coming" before it's not? All this does is buy time for an event to happen which could be claimed as what was being referred to, in the world of politics if you string something out for 1-2 months then there's bound to be a major news story which breaks and then suddenly all the followers claim this was what was coming all along.

Which leads us onto, I want to know what is coming. Why are descriptions so vague? Why do people have to work out the story themselves? Lets assume Q has inside info and knows something like, 100 top actors are about to be arrested for molesting kids in the 80's. If they are happy to leak enough info that followers can "work it out" then why can the deep state and all these other shadow organisations not work it out as well, are we assuming that figures who run the world in secret have no-one working for them who's intelligent enough to decipher these messages but some random joe can and make a youtube video on it? So logically there's no reason to not drop actual facts of what's going on, but of course this is essentially what mediums do while cold reading, they throw out something vague enough that people can latch onto it and create the story themselves. If Q said "In the next month Hollywood is going to be rocked with scandals and people arrested for crimes against children" then when it doesn't happen everyone knows it's a load of bullshyt however if it's something like "Something is coming, people did evil things, they will pay" then there's no link to who, how many, what was done, etc. so you have morons sharing tweets of 1 person making a random claim against someone else and in their head this is "proof Q was right!".

This. You're all dickriding Nostradamus itt.

Heterologously Vaccinated Superior Race Crew

Kurt Russell, Ray Winstone, Mickey Rourke Crew

"The dominant economic order rests on unofficial dependency and official individualism. Survival requires the transposition of these two ideas: official solidarity and unofficial individualism."

07-31-2018, 02:54 PM

-

#287

rampagefc77
Registered User

rampagefc77
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2006

Age: 39

Posts: 20,625

Rep Power: 153167

Originally Posted By z4v4⏩

Please... you guys will just change the definition of the word big rather than admit Q is just psyop.

Q might be. But few psyops last 10 months.

MSM could also be a psyop. We know they coordinated the the Clinton campaign through the podesta emails. We know their relentless trump bashing against all logic. Are they just as dangerous as Q? Absolutely.

07-31-2018, 02:56 PM

-

#288

rampagefc77
Registered User

rampagefc77
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2006

Age: 39

Posts: 20,625

Rep Power: 153167

Originally Posted By Reflexez⏩

I personally disagree that they're plausible, but that's opinions.

I'd just like some actual proof of something(s) which were said would happen and then did and prove that there's a deep state or whatever else people are claiming.

For me it's very simple, I want my facts to be watertight not some tenuous link where Q said something like "something big is coming" and then some random event happens like FB stocks drop and everyone goes "OMG that must have been what was meant", because you can twist any major event to fitting in the box of "something big".

I also want a time frame, how long can you keep saying "something big is coming" before it's not? All this does is buy time for an event to happen which could be claimed as what was being referred to, in the world of politics if you string something out for 1-2 months then there's bound to be a major news story which breaks and then suddenly all the followers claim this was what was coming all along.

Which leads us onto, I want to know what is coming. Why are descriptions so vague? Why do people have to work out the story themselves? Lets assume Q has inside info and knows something like, 100 top actors are about to be arrested for molesting kids in the 80's. If they are happy to leak enough info that followers can "work it out" then why can the deep state and all these other shadow organisations not work it out as well, are we assuming that figures who run the world in secret have no-one working for them who's intelligent enough to decipher these messages but some random joe can and make a youtube video on it? So logically there's no reason to not drop actual facts of what's going on, but of course this is essentially what mediums do while cold reading, they throw out something vague enough that people can latch onto it and create the story themselves. If Q said "In the next month Hollywood is going to be rocked with scandals and people arrested for crimes against children" then when it doesn't happen everyone knows it's a load of bullshyt however if it's something like "Something is coming, people did evil things, they will pay" then there's no link to who, how many, what was done, etc. so you have morons sharing tweets of 1 person making a random claim against someone else and in their head this is "proof Q was right!".

So where do you get your news? MSM doesn’t fit your criteria. Do you just follow nobody because no sources are currently reliable with watertight facts, timelines, and proof?

07-31-2018, 03:06 PM

-

#289

z4v4
SillieBazzillie Alt #z4

z4v4
SillieBazzillie Alt #z4

Join Date: May 2017

Posts: 41,412

Rep Power: 82451

Originally Posted By Reflexez⏩

I personally disagree that they're plausible, but that's opinions.

I'd just like some actual proof of something(s) which were said would happen and then did and prove that there's a deep state or whatever else people are claiming.

For me it's very simple, I want my facts to be watertight not some tenuous link where Q said something like "something big is coming" and then some random event happens like FB stocks drop and everyone goes "OMG that must have been what was meant", because you can twist any major event to fitting in the box of "something big".

I also want a time frame, how long can you keep saying "something big is coming" before it's not? All this does is buy time for an event to happen which could be claimed as what was being referred to, in the world of politics if you string something out for 1-2 months then there's bound to be a major news story which breaks and then suddenly all the followers claim this was what was coming all along.

Which leads us onto, I want to know what is coming. Why are descriptions so vague? Why do people have to work out the story themselves? Lets assume Q has inside info and knows something like, 100 top actors are about to be arrested for molesting kids in the 80's. If they are happy to leak enough info that followers can "work it out" then why can the deep state and all these other shadow organisations not work it out as well, are we assuming that figures who run the world in secret have no-one working for them who's intelligent enough to decipher these messages but some random joe can and make a youtube video on it? So logically there's no reason to not drop actual facts of what's going on, but of course this is essentially what mediums do while cold reading, they throw out something vague enough that people can latch onto it and create the story themselves. If Q said "In the next month Hollywood is going to be rocked with scandals and people arrested for crimes against children" then when it doesn't happen everyone knows it's a load of bullshyt however if it's something like "Something is coming, people did evil things, they will pay" then there's no link to who, how many, what was done, etc. so you have morons sharing tweets of 1 person making a random claim against someone else and in their head this is "proof Q was right!".

The flame feels hot not because it is fire but because we are weak
The flames are high and the heat is strong
Your president needs you to be incombustible
Q

Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."

z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"

Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."

z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?

Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."

07-31-2018, 03:15 PM

-

#290

z4v4
SillieBazzillie Alt #z4

z4v4
SillieBazzillie Alt #z4

Join Date: May 2017

Posts: 41,412

Rep Power: 82451

Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩

Q might be. But few psyops last 10 months.

MSM could also be a psyop. We know they coordinated the the Clinton campaign through the podesta emails. We know their relentless trump bashing against all logic. Are they just as dangerous as Q? Absolutely.

The problem isn't Q. The problem is the people. You think CNN isn't just biased toward leftist ideals, you legit think they are run by a society that controls the world.

Right now the enemy are the entities that are working to divide the country, get us to fight one another. It's not Trump and it's not the MSM nor the democrats, no matter how much each invariably aide in that due to blaming each other.

Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."

z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"

Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."

z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?

Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."

07-31-2018, 03:18 PM

-

#291

Reflexez
bad_Liberal_Man

Reflexez
bad_Liberal_Man

Join Date: Dec 2011

Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)

Posts: 5,292

Rep Power: 28445

Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩

So where do you get your news? MSM doesn’t fit your criteria. Do you just follow nobody because no sources are currently reliable with watertight facts, timelines, and proof?

I read "news" from various sources, if I find something interesting then I'll research it more and look for exactly what was said/context/external facts then make up an opinion. In reality most of the "news" is just total garbage that has no impact on my life, I have no interest in knowing about, or is more science based where facts are less in dispute. Also Q isn't a "news source", people claim it's someone with insider info direct from Trump, it's not like they should be relying on half truths and trying to build a story around what they know, there is no reason for Q to post as they do.

If you imagine Q posts as a cryptic problem and the readers bringing their knowledge to try and solve it, the more people and external information they bring then the more likely that it is someone will make a link to an event and try to trace it back to what Q posted as being the answer. Q thrives off more people working on the problem as it's easier to jam enough pieces together and claim they fit when you have more people providing theories.

Current ShareBlue earnings: $103,587.99

Certified deb00nker & corrector of the record.

07-31-2018, 03:19 PM

-

#292

rampagefc77
Registered User

rampagefc77
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2006

Age: 39

Posts: 20,625

Rep Power: 153167

Originally Posted By z4v4⏩

The problem isn't Q. The problem is the people. You think CNN isn't just biased toward leftist ideals, you legit think they are run by a society that controls the world.

Right now the enemy are the entities that are working to divide the country, get us to fight one another. It's not Trump and it's not the MSM nor the democrats, no matter how much each invariably aide in that due to blaming each other.

CNNs actions go beyond bias at this point. It might as well be the propaganda arm of the DNC.

07-31-2018, 03:20 PM

-

#293

~Hades~
True Patriot Crew

~Hades~
True Patriot Crew

Join Date: Dec 2007

Posts: 26,187

Rep Power: 695527

Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩

CNNs actions go beyond bias at this point. It might as well be the propaganda arm of the DNC.

.They ARE the propaganda arm of the DNC

Royal Crew
Chiefs Crew
Festivus Cew

07-31-2018, 03:27 PM

-

#294

z4v4
SillieBazzillie Alt #z4

z4v4
SillieBazzillie Alt #z4

Join Date: May 2017

Posts: 41,412

Rep Power: 82451

Originally Posted By ~Hades~⏩

.They ARE the propaganda arm of the DNC

Q said it, amirite?

Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."

z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"

Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."

z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?

Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."

07-31-2018, 03:35 PM

-

#295

~Hades~
True Patriot Crew

~Hades~
True Patriot Crew

Join Date: Dec 2007

Posts: 26,187

Rep Power: 695527

Originally Posted By z4v4⏩

Q said it, amirite?

Don’t need some anonymous Nostradamus to know it’s true bro

Royal Crew
Chiefs Crew
Festivus Cew

07-31-2018, 03:38 PM

-

#296

gwem32170191
Registered User

gwem32170191
Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2010

Location: United States

Age: 39

Posts: 9,669

Rep Power: 44862

Originally Posted By ~Hades~⏩

Don’t need some anonymous Nostradamus to know it’s true bro

Nostradanonymous

It is not so much the major events as the small day-to-day decisions that map the course of our living. . . Our lives are, in reality, the sum total of our seemingly unimportant decisions and of our capacity to live by those decisions. ― Gordon B. Hinckley

07-31-2018, 03:43 PM

-

#297

Reflexez
bad_Liberal_Man

Reflexez
bad_Liberal_Man

Join Date: Dec 2011

Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)

Posts: 5,292

Rep Power: 28445

Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩

CNNs actions go beyond bias at this point. It might as well be the propaganda arm of the DNC.

I personally think it's wrong to call the MSM "propaganda", it gives a disconnection with their messages that allows people to just outright dismiss them regardless of facts or content.

There's no denying that CNN is a liberal/left leaning organisation which is going to appeal to it's viewer base, this is identical to organisations on the right who do exactly the same thing. I mean it's like people forget that Fox was constantly called Faux News during 8 years of Obama because of the number of times they came out with what was called propaganda.

As long as a news outlet is posting factual information then they shouldn't be seen as propaganda. Yes things like "Donald 2 scoops" is pretty pathetic and not news to most people, but if it happened and it's fact then you need to accept it and move on, the press will always support a side it's the peoples job to look at both of them and come out with a balanced opinion, people who call CNN fake news 24/7 while believing lies from Breibart or Trump are just as much a part of the problem as liberals screaming at the sky.

Current ShareBlue earnings: $103,587.99

Certified deb00nker & corrector of the record.

07-31-2018, 03:44 PM

-

#298

rampagefc77
Registered User

rampagefc77
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2006

Age: 39

Posts: 20,625

Rep Power: 153167

Originally Posted By Reflexez⏩

I read "news" from various sources, if I find something interesting then I'll research it more and look for exactly what was said/context/external facts then make up an opinion. In reality most of the "news" is just total garbage that has no impact on my life, I have no interest in knowing about, or is more science based where facts are less in dispute. Also Q isn't a "news source", people claim it's someone with insider info direct from Trump, it's not like they should be relying on half truths and trying to build a story around what they know, there is no reason for Q to post as they do.

If you imagine Q posts as a cryptic problem and the readers bringing their knowledge to try and solve it, the more people and external information they bring then the more likely that it is someone will make a link to an event and try to trace it back to what Q posted as being the answer. Q thrives off more people working on the problem as it's easier to jam enough pieces together and claim they fit when you have more people providing theories.

Q has written out narratives of what happened and what players were involved, but is careful not to leak classified info directly. If we come to the conclusion ourself, or use publically available but overlooked sourcing, that skirts by national security laws. We have Horowitz and Huber investigating these crimes, you don’t want to ruin the integrity of the investigation by leaking classified info directly.

That’s my take on it. You may see it different.

07-31-2018, 03:48 PM

-

#299

Forty0zFreedom
Banned

Forty0zFreedom
Banned

Join Date: May 2010

Age: 44

Posts: 6,987

Rep Power: 0

This stuff is definitely interesting but I'll be 100% skeptical until something actually comes to light. That said, its NOT a conspiracy that there is a worldwide, powerful ring of people who do horrible things to children. That is happening RIGHT NOW as we fight about transgender pronouns. Who these people really are is anyone's guess, but everybody should hope something DOES come to light and stops it.