Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Were the Beatles really all that great, fellas?
  1. Results 61 to 90 of 115
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. Last
post 1564641651 10-26-2018, 04:26 AM
-
#61
  1. wasp9166
  2. straight out da bronx
  1. wasp9166
  2. straight out da bronx
  3. Join Date: Nov 2008
  4. Location: NY
  5. Posts: 52,633
  6. Subscribers: 3
  7. Rep Power: 512336
watch a few documentaries , they did things on their later albums that had never been done before

wasn't just them, also their manager and engineers

and if you don't legit feel deep sh!t listening to this, you're an animal



and let's not forget, a woman ruined the beatles
post 1564641731 10-26-2018, 04:29 AM
-
#62
  1. xpetiteange911x
  2. Registered User
  1. xpetiteange911x
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 17
  6. Rep Power: 0
I’m glad you posted this thread. I don’t think they’re the worst, but I do think they’re overrated. Mostly by older generations.
post 1564641751 10-26-2018, 04:31 AM
-
#63
  1. wasp9166
  2. straight out da bronx
  1. wasp9166
  2. straight out da bronx
  3. Join Date: Nov 2008
  4. Location: NY
  5. Posts: 52,633
  6. Subscribers: 3
  7. Rep Power: 512336
Originally Posted By xpetiteange911x
I’m glad you posted this thread. I don’t think they’re the worst, but I do think they’re overrated. Mostly by older generations.
let's talk about it over dinner
post 1564642131 10-26-2018, 04:46 AM
-
#64
  1. Swept
  1. Swept
  2. Join Date: Jan 2014
  3. Posts: 21,221
  4. Rep Power: 27953
70% of their music is boy band garbage made specifically for a target audience of young girls at the time.


The other 30% is considered the most influential music ever. I don’t care for it much but almost all those 70s, 80s and 90s band seem to reference them.
Everything I do is biblical
post 1564642281 10-26-2018, 04:51 AM
-
#65
  1. wasp9166
  2. straight out da bronx
  1. wasp9166
  2. straight out da bronx
  3. Join Date: Nov 2008
  4. Location: NY
  5. Posts: 52,633
  6. Subscribers: 3
  7. Rep Power: 512336
personally , i think all things must pass is a great album and has two of the best songs out of everything he did

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Things_Must_Pass




legit tear up everytime ^^^, but f billy could play






i prefer this to any beatles album, i think george was the most talented but was kept under thumb by john and paul
post 1564643621 10-26-2018, 05:43 AM
-
#66
  1. WoofieNugget
  1. WoofieNugget
  2. Join Date: Jun 2010
  3. Age: 51
  4. Posts: 24,112
  5. Rep Power: 109783
If you look at the way they wrote their songs and chord progressions they were ground breaking for the time. Same with the way their music was mixed and produced. That's why they are considered among the best and most influential, whether you like the style or not.

They were also one of the first bands to "evolve" their music over a couple of different genres where other artists stayed exactly the same.

Last live performance was 1966 and their last album came out in 1970 - so they didn't even need to tour to make money.
post 1564645421 10-26-2018, 06:30 AM
-
#67
  1. Knice1232
  2. Registered User
  1. Knice1232
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2017
  4. Location: Colorado, United States
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 131
  7. Rep Power: 677
I can understand the case for most influential, but no way are they the best. I hear this argument all the time, but they don't even make my top 20 bands of all time. It's appropriate that a huge movie is coming out now on them, but in my opinion, Queen is the greatest band of all time. They are obviously known for their hits, but listen to their albums front to back, and you will realize that they really never made a bad song. They are pretty much the perfect rock band.
post 1564645711 10-26-2018, 06:36 AM
-
#68
  1. AquilaConfido
  2. Banned
  1. AquilaConfido
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2013
  4. Location: London, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 42
  6. Posts: 6,222
  7. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By DonVonDuck
I know they had a lot of hits and stuff, but how much of that was just a result of horny young gals hearing those fancy accents, laying eyes on those stylish haircuts and sogging up their stinky little panties something nasty? Am I out of line here, fellas? Maybe I am. I'm not too well-versed on the Beatles. Looking back, I never understood the God-like worship everyone has for these wipes. Lets be honest here, does anyone think for even one second that Yellow Submarine was a good song? Would it still have been a hit if any other group released it? Doubt it. I highly doubt it. Stick the Bee Gees name next to it and see how well it does. They would've been the laughing stock of the industry. And really, the same could be said for most of the Beatles library. It's very easy to churn out hit after hit when millions of gals are plunging their bogs to you every night. Fantasizing about your hair. Doesn't even matter what you sing at that point. The bogs will be plunged regardless. Am I wrong on this, boys? Maybe I just don't understand it. The whole "Beatlemania" thing.
3 pages and nobody posted links to some of their best songs?

Cannotbelieve.gif

Anywhere, here you go.









post 1564645861 10-26-2018, 06:41 AM
-
#69
  1. paulinus
  2. Bobby phag
  1. paulinus
  2. Bobby phag
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
  5. Posts: 327
  6. Rep Power: 0
They all have terrible canthal tilt.
Only Misc at work crew
Mod negged crew
post 1564646841 10-26-2018, 07:00 AM
-
#70
  1. badreligion
  2. Meh
  1. badreligion
  2. Meh
  3. Join Date: Jan 2006
  4. Location: Groton, Connecticut, United States
  5. Posts: 25,200
  6. Rep Power: 55006
No , they were overrated and truth be told had very little talent .
In Hoots We Trust.
post 1564647411 10-26-2018, 07:08 AM
-
#71
  1. nm1891
  2. Registered User
  1. nm1891
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Posts: 9,078
  5. Rep Power: 28909
So many edge lords itt, it's not even some unique rebel opinion, tons of people call the beatles overrated now to the point that they'll become underrated eventually lol. I think it is telling that to this day, actual musicians from rock to hip hop cite the beatles as a primary influence. You may not like the Beatles but I assure you an artist you do like has been influenced heavily by the Beatles.
S/B/D—185/165/205 (sumo w/ straps)
post 1564648001 10-26-2018, 07:18 AM
-
#72
  1. 300BLK
  2. Registered User
  1. 300BLK
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2015
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 20,309
  6. Rep Power: 12702
Originally Posted By Swept
70% of their music is boy band garbage made specifically for a target audience of young girls at the time.


The other 30% is considered the most influential music ever. I don’t care for it much but almost all those 70s, 80s and 90s band seem to reference them.
This. Overrated but I can see how they made their impact....
***Black Crew***
No Face Crew
post 1564655341 10-26-2018, 09:00 AM
-
#73
  1. AlBHappy
  2. Caucasian, Bro/Brah/Bruh
  1. AlBHappy
  2. Caucasian, Bro/Brah/Bruh
  3. Join Date: Feb 2016
  4. Posts: 7,794
  5. Rep Power: 107487
Originally Posted By wasp9166
personally , i think all things must pass is a great album and has two of the best songs out of everything he did

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Things_Must_Pass




legit tear up everytime ^^^, but f billy could play






i prefer this to any beatles album, i think george was the most talented but was kept under thumb by john and paul
All Things Must Pass is fantastic. Repped for isn't It a Pity. Wah Wah is about him telling Paul to Shut the Phuc Up


Paul was far and away the most talented. He plays every instrument, and had a fantastic voice. He plays all the drums on Back In the USSR, Ballad of John an Yoko, the whole McCartney, and Band on The Run albums.

They are the farthest thing from overrrated. 3 guys wrote songs and sang lead. George put out Here Comes The Sun an Something, which, Frank Sinatra said was the greatest love song of the 20th century.

McCartney wrote, Yesterday, Let It Be, Hey Jude Sgt Pepper was his ideal

John wrote a Day in the Life, Strawberry Fields Forever.

All classics. Listen to their sound in 1963 then in 1968/1969. Completely different. They could play love songs, hits songs, hard rock songs. Listen to I Want To Hold Your Hand, From Me To You and Please Please Me. Then listen to I Got A Feeling, Helter Skelter, and Don't Let Me Down 5 year span, you wouldn't say they were the same band if you didn't know.
post 1564655831 10-26-2018, 09:08 AM
-
#74
  1. SuperHercules
  1. SuperHercules
  2. Join Date: Jun 2014
  3. Height: 6'5"
  4. Posts: 32,498
  5. Subscribers: 6
  6. Rep Power: 570412
Originally Posted By paulinus
They all have terrible canthal tilt.
In the real world people don't care about that (and no I'm not a poverty negative tilter)
See Shakebrah's sig
post 1564656061 10-26-2018, 09:12 AM
-
#75
  1. GolfPants
  2. Registered Miscer
  1. GolfPants
  2. Registered Miscer
  3. Join Date: Jul 2008
  4. Posts: 16,671
  5. Rep Power: 70847
Never really cared for them. Help! and Twist and Shout (a cover) are the only songs I can name off the top of my head that I like
I call it "Celebration". It's sexual, and violent...

New Jersey Crew (732)
post 1564657121 10-26-2018, 09:27 AM
-
#76
  1. phikappa
  2. I'm not that bright
  1. phikappa
  2. I'm not that bright
  3. Join Date: Jan 2003
  4. Location: CA
  5. Posts: 39,332
  6. Rep Power: 159608
The Beatles were pretty innovative. The had a lot of "firsts".

-First rock song to not use rock instruments (Eleanor Rigby)
-First rock song to not use a drum kit (And I Love Her)
-First song to use backwards recording (Strawberry Fields)
-First song to use a recording mistake, a big no-no back then (I Feel Fine)
-First song to use a non-traditional instrument (Norwegian Wood)
-First rock song to use a jazz chord (forget which song)

Lots of other examples.
Jon Cole's Gym: '79 - '85
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=9275071&d=1603917754
post 1564657921 10-26-2018, 09:37 AM
-
#77
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
^

lol the backwards recording one is true, wtf is a Norwegian wood.

but the rest, i don't think so tim, early blues players had rock songs that did all those things.
post 1564658451 10-26-2018, 09:42 AM
-
#78
  1. FAPhaggot
  2. Hawaiian shirt hoarder
  1. FAPhaggot
  2. Hawaiian shirt hoarder
  3. Join Date: Nov 2015
  4. Posts: 24,226
  5. Rep Power: 185354
Originally Posted By mikieson
Back then it literally didn't take much to WOW the world. The Beatles are basically all very mediocre musicians that just so happened to hit at the right time. It just kills people to even fathom that but true. Never liked them never will..
This. Nothing makes me rage more than people who think Ringo Starr is a good drummer. ****ing nothing. He played basic 4/4 **** for a band you happen to like, that doesn't make him a good drummer. A ****ing trained monkey could have played 90% of the Beatles drum parts.

"But he did it with such FEEL!!" Suck my dick, *******.

I'd say they are more a product of their time and place. They were a boy band marketed to a generation of 16-20 year old Baby Boomer *******s, in an environment where major labels/studios could control almost all the music put out on the radio and records in stores.
FA Crew
Always Pick 1 Crew

"Experience is something you get right after you need it."
post 1564658581 10-26-2018, 09:43 AM
-
#79
  1. phikappa
  2. I'm not that bright
  1. phikappa
  2. I'm not that bright
  3. Join Date: Jan 2003
  4. Location: CA
  5. Posts: 39,332
  6. Rep Power: 159608
Originally Posted By gluon
^lol the backwards recording one is true, wtf is a Norwegian wood.

but the rest, i don't think so tim, early blues players had rock songs that did all those things.
1) Early Blues players played Blues, not Rock. Rock and Blues are different. Learn your genres, bro.
2) No they didn't. There's not one Blues song with a string quartet.
3) If you don't know Norwegian Wood, please go.
Jon Cole's Gym: '79 - '85
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=9275071&d=1603917754
post 1564659231 10-26-2018, 09:50 AM
-
#80
  1. Leon09
  2. Registered User
  1. Leon09
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Posts: 5,642
  5. Rep Power: 7597
Lol nah. I literally can not name any of their songs and I've only met one person who actually liked them
post 1564659341 10-26-2018, 09:51 AM
-
#81
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
Originally Posted By phikappa
1) Early Blues players played Blues, not Rock. Rock and Blues are different. Learn your genres, bro.
2) No they didn't. There's not one Blues song with a string quartet.
3) If you don't know Norwegian Wood, please go.
1) Fats Domino disagrees " “Everybody started callin’ my music rock and roll,” he once said, “but it wasn’t anything but the same rhythm and blues I’d been playin’ down in New Orleans.”

2) LMAO how bout a woodwind ensemble, an upright base and a piano.

3) no
post 1564659671 10-26-2018, 09:55 AM
-
#82
  1. ForumNature
  2. no bots about it
  1. ForumNature
  2. no bots about it
  3. Join Date: Feb 2106
  4. Posts: 3,750
  5. Rep Power: 2146490
I figured Maxwell's Silver Hammer would be a Misc anthem:

~BBCOM Chadmin~
~Outdoor Recreation Crew~
Go outside and play.
Open your mind.
post 1564664931 10-26-2018, 10:44 AM
-
#83
  1. SmillironS
  2. Registered User
  1. SmillironS
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: South Dakota
  5. Age: 41
  6. Height: 6'8"
  7. Weight: 350 lbs
  8. Posts: 11,296
  9. Subscribers: 2
  10. Rep Power: 189689
Originally Posted By ImpressiveGainz
The Beatles were some of the most savvy businessmen in music ever. They basically copied Chuck Berry and made billions instead of selling genre-creating songs for $50.
Strong this, Chuck Berry is the most under appreciated artist in history.
post 1564665141 10-26-2018, 10:47 AM
-
#84
  1. Jax05
  2. Tuna, No Crust
  1. Jax05
  2. Tuna, No Crust
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Posts: 26,055
  5. Rep Power: 91463
overrated af
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit softly.
post 1564668241 10-26-2018, 11:19 AM
-
#85
  1. gharlow
  2. Pumpin' N Humpin'
  1. gharlow
  2. Pumpin' N Humpin'
  3. Join Date: Sep 2007
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 42
  6. Posts: 2,693
  7. Rep Power: 18090
I would easily take Hendrix, Doors, Rolling Stones, Zeppelin, Joplin and I'm sure a few others over the Beatles.

Their influence can't be overstated, but I really don't think their songs aged very well.

Ready for negs for this...

Wu Tang "My Heart Gently Weeps" is better than My Guitar Gently Weeps.

Motley Crue's "Helter Skelter" >>>> The Beatle's version.
*MFCi*
Crybaby crew
Full blown meltdown crew
They hurt my feels crew
post 1564668921 10-26-2018, 11:28 AM
-
#86
  1. DualBandWiFi
  2. Operating at 5.2 GHz
  1. DualBandWiFi
  2. Operating at 5.2 GHz
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Posts: 2,258
  5. Rep Power: 18759
I'd say they are pretty mediocre and I wasn't even alive back then.
Agar.io Crew - Cell Tech Poverty Gains Liberal Agenda
Repped by RICHSTRONG TWICE crew
post 1564669401 10-26-2018, 11:35 AM
-
#87
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 24,817
  5. Rep Power: 0
hating on the beatles has become a political statement at this point.

Like a generational cope or something lol

this generation is pretty much saying "fuk you we don't go back in time anymore, we are too densely overloaded with information, there is no room for the past and history hurts our ego anyway because there is no remarkability left to discover"

something along the lines of that lol
post 1564669781 10-26-2018, 11:40 AM
-
#88
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  3. Join Date: Dec 2002
  4. Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 27,158
  6. Rep Power: 346296
Originally Posted By impressive
The Beatles were some of the most savvy businessmen in music ever. They basically copied Chuck Berry and made billions instead of selling genre-creating songs for $50.
Lmfaoooooooooo!

P!ease tell me you're trolling?

Which Chuck Berry's songs did they rip off for these?


fist yourself
post 1564670101 10-26-2018, 11:46 AM
-
#89
  1. SkinnyPhatBrah
  2. Registered User
  1. SkinnyPhatBrah
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Posts: 3,182
  5. Rep Power: 14345
Originally Posted By Jasonw1178
I'm embarrassed that my parents still listen to Elvis.
are you a little hellion, perhaps feeling rebellious?
Positive Crew - will never neg.

Actually Lifts Crew - will always rep lifting vids when posted.

Stand Up And Prosper people - one way or another, everybody here will make it.
post 1564670141 10-26-2018, 11:46 AM
-
#90
  1. PatheticPeter
  2. Registered User
  1. PatheticPeter
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Age: 23
  5. Posts: 8,624
  6. Rep Power: 39163
i know you gorillas won't get it,
but watch this 90 second video on why they stand out from the rest:

Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts