Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» A thread on Q's most recent posts [Something Big Is About To Drop]
  1. Results 3301 to 3330 of 4790
  2. First
  3. 109
  4. 110
  5. 111
  6. 112
  7. 113
  8. Last
post 1565333741 11-04-2018, 04:16 AM
-
#3301
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By z4v4
That's your response, a ban bet? Lmao. Firstly, I don't do ban bets, as I'm older than 13; secondly, this thread has been a drag since OP got smoked out on a ban bet.
We have somehow shifted from me posting about interesting and relevant drops... to arguing about why mueller signed up. Even strzok, who helped create the whole thing, texted page that he was hesitant to sign up for the mueller investigation because there wasn’t a THERE there (aka they had nothing and sifting through communications was unlikely to show anything).

Instead of arguing mundane ****, make a ban bet if you are so confident that spygate is a wild conspiracy. Easy win for you right?

If you are t confident enough to bet, and if you refuse to discuss the drops, seriously... why are you here? It makes no sense.
post 1565333771 11-04-2018, 04:17 AM
-
#3302
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 46,410
  7. Rep Power: 219352
Originally Posted By rampagefc77
Permaban bet: trump goes down for collusion vs. people go down for spygate.

Willing to take it?
So you think betting that the POTUS gets impeached for collusion is equivalent to regular people going down for spygate?

How about Team Trump is accused of collusion by Mueller before anyone is indicted for spygate? And not a perma as I'd miss your dogged adherence to conspiracy theories.
Early AM workout crew.
Holy crap dude, Satan's huge crew.
post 1565334051 11-04-2018, 04:27 AM
-
#3303
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie
So you think betting that the POTUS gets impeached for collusion is equivalent to regular people going down for spygate?

How about Team Trump is accused of collusion by Mueller before anyone is indicted for spygate? And not a perma as I'd miss your dogged adherence to conspiracy theories.
Regular people= the top of the fbi, doj, international ally assets like halper, downer, Tawil, cia, etc?

Just normal folks, putting on their hard hat, packing their lunch and working their 9-5.

And who strikes first is irrelevant. Mueller put out indictments for Flynn and papadapolus.. and where are those going? Did you watch the papa video I posted? I know it’s an hour, but it’s a must watch for anyone if you want to understand how he was set up repeatedly to make it seem like he was colluding with Russia.

3 month ban bet that spygate ensnares more colluding people than muellers Russia probe does for trumps team colluding with Russia.

If you look at my post history, you’ll see I’ve never been one to dabble in conspiracies. And I didn’t even vote for trump. It is just that blatantly obvious when you sit down and look at the facts what happened. And whether you like trump or not, if that becomes our standard then our country is fcuked.
post 1565334261 11-04-2018, 04:34 AM
-
#3304
  1. VinnyPazRules
  2. Chitcoin sell
  1. VinnyPazRules
  2. Chitcoin sell
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Posts: 14,060
  5. Rep Power: 37269
Originally Posted By rampagefc77
He probably has some skeletons in the closet. Uranium one, etc. these are his people he is protecting.

Why don’t we ask him? I don’t know.
You cracked the case. Nice job. Has this turd dropped yet or what?
post 1565334271 11-04-2018, 04:35 AM
-
#3305
  1. VinnyPazRules
  2. Chitcoin sell
  1. VinnyPazRules
  2. Chitcoin sell
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Posts: 14,060
  5. Rep Power: 37269
Originally Posted By RSM3
Did the awesome new development from Q drop yet ?

Will retards at Trump rallies still be wearing Q shirts as they chant "Space Force !!" ?
I think it's close, any minute now
post 1565336341 11-04-2018, 05:46 AM
-
#3306
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 46,410
  7. Rep Power: 219352
Originally Posted By rampagefc77
Regular people= the top of the fbi, doj, international ally assets like halper, downer, Tawil, cia, etc?

Just normal folks, putting on their hard hat, packing their lunch and working their 9-5.

And who strikes first is irrelevant. Mueller put out indictments for Flynn and papadapolus.. and where are those going? Did you watch the papa video I posted? I know it’s an hour, but it’s a must watch for anyone if you want to understand how he was set up repeatedly to make it seem like he was colluding with Russia.

3 month ban bet that spygate ensnares more colluding people than muellers Russia probe does for trumps team colluding with Russia.

If you look at my post history, you’ll see I’ve never been one to dabble in conspiracies. And I didn’t even vote for trump. It is just that blatantly obvious when you sit down and look at the facts what happened. And whether you like trump or not, if that becomes our standard then our country is fcuked.
We'd have to figure out timing and stuff but let's wait until after mid-terms to make it official since I could be gone for a long time if there's no blue wave.
Early AM workout crew.
Holy crap dude, Satan's huge crew.
post 1565338301 11-04-2018, 06:38 AM
-
#3307
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie
We'd have to figure out timing and stuff but let's wait until after mid-terms to make it official since I could be gone for a long time if there's no blue wave.
I think I might have taken your 3 month van bet about the house turning blue.
post 1565338391 11-04-2018, 06:40 AM
-
#3308
  1. z4v4
  2. SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
  1. z4v4
  2. SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
  3. Join Date: May 2017
  4. Posts: 41,412
  5. Rep Power: 82451
Originally Posted By rampagefc77
We have somehow shifted from me posting about interesting and relevant drops... to arguing about why mueller signed up.
No, you shifted to Mueller coz your kookiness spans several topics and you needed to get your licks in.
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."

z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"

Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."

z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?

Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
post 1565338421 11-04-2018, 06:40 AM
-
#3309
  1. miscinbro
  2. Registered User
  1. miscinbro
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 22,420
  6. Rep Power: 46435
Originally Posted By rampagefc77
My assertion is that mueller was handed a steaming pile of crap and he knew it.
You know he was in private practice before he took the investigation right? He took like a 10x paycut to do it as well, and he got a lot of people from his former firm to do the same. He wasn’t “handed” anything.

Edit: seems others beat me to it. However I’m still adding he got a number of other partners from WilmerHale to come with him. I suppose it was all skeletons in there closet too?
post 1565342451 11-04-2018, 08:10 AM
-
#3310
  1. PlanoLifter
  2. I lift therefore I am
  1. PlanoLifter
  2. I lift therefore I am
  3. Join Date: Oct 2014
  4. Location: Plano, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 7,423
  6. Rep Power: 103033
Originally Posted By rampagefc77
He probably has some skeletons in the closet. Uranium one, etc. these are his people he is protecting.

Why don’t we ask him? I don’t know.
Wow. Just. Wow
If you look at my post history, you’ll see I’ve never been one to dabble in conspiracies.
You seem to have started with the skeletons and uranium and protecting his people statements.


Permaban bet: trump goes down for collusion vs. people go down for spygate.
This is what weak minded people with the maturity of a teenager do.


You should take some time out of this thread. You are coming unglued.
74
post 1565342761 11-04-2018, 08:15 AM
-
#3311
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By miscinbro
You know he was in private practice before he took the investigation right? He took like a 10x paycut to do it as well, and he got a lot of people from his former firm to do the same. He wasn’t “handed” anything.

Edit: seems others beat me to it. However I’m still adding he got a number of other partners from WilmerHale to come with him. I suppose it was all skeletons in there closet too?
When I say he was handed the counterintel case, that is exactly what happened.

Normally a special counsel is appointed, they do an investigation, they subpoena for phone and email records after going to a grand jury and proving probable cause, etc. The counterintel investigation had FISA warrants on Page and apparently papadapolous. That gives them records, including retrospectively, of all communications of that person and others within TWO HOPS of that person. Which would include basically everyone in the administration. All obtained by lying to a FISA court. We already know that there was widespread unmasking taking place, because all of those communications obtained through the FISA warrant would have the other person masked. They needed to know who was who so they could get to their real targets, hence the unmasking. We already know from testimony that Powers said that despite her name being on so many unmasking requests, she didn't sign off on them. So someone was fraudulently using her name in the process. Only a handful of people had authority to do so, it shouldn't be hard to get to the bottom of it.

This was all handed to Mueller-- he took over the counterintel investigation. He didn't need to conduct an investigation, go before a grand jury and prove his case as to why he should have records from xyz... he already hand them. He was tasked with finding a crime, and providing cover for what took place.

Why he did it? According to you, pure altruism and a sense of duty for his country? ...Right.
post 1565343101 11-04-2018, 08:22 AM
-
#3312
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By PlanoLifter
Wow. Just. Wow




You seem to have started with the skeletons and uranium and protecting his people statements.






This is what weak minded people with the maturity of a teenager do.


You should take some time out of this thread. You are coming unglued.
There is an open investigation into uranium one. How is that a conspiracy? He was FBI director when that all took place.

We went from me attempting to argue events and facts, to discussing what Mueller's motivation was for taking on the role of special counsel. Neither you nor I know. I am saying that I think early on he must have known that something shady took place to get all of the information he was handed, if what we have been told by house intel committee members is true about the FISA warrant, etc. If he served no other purpose than to get to the bottom of what took place around the election, and he came across FISA abuse, illegal unmaskings, etc. and decided to continue on despite this, you can only assume that his intentions are not as pure as you imply.

The bottom line is none of us know, but the fact that Mueller took a pay cut to do it doesn't mean that nothing illegal took place relating to spygate. Trump took a massive paycut to be president, therefore he couldn't have possibly committed any crimes!!! See how that works? The most flawed logic ever.
post 1565343541 11-04-2018, 08:32 AM
-
#3313
  1. PlanoLifter
  2. I lift therefore I am
  1. PlanoLifter
  2. I lift therefore I am
  3. Join Date: Oct 2014
  4. Location: Plano, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 7,423
  6. Rep Power: 103033
Originally Posted By rampagefc77
There is an open investigation into uranium one. How is that a conspiracy? He was FBI director when that all took place.

We went from me attempting to argue events and facts, to discussing what Mueller's motivation was for taking on the role of special counsel. Neither you nor I know. I am saying that I think early on he must have known that something shady took place to get all of the information he was handed, if what we have been told by house intel committee members is true about the FISA warrant, etc. If he served no other purpose than to get to the bottom of what took place around the election, and he came across FISA abuse, illegal unmaskings, etc. and decided to continue on despite this, you can only assume that his intentions are not as pure as you imply.

The bottom line is none of us know, but the fact that Mueller took a pay cut to do it doesn't mean that nothing illegal took place relating to spygate. Trump took a massive paycut to be president, therefore he couldn't have possibly committed any crimes!!! See how that works? The most flawed logic ever.
You are so vested in this so-called spygate that you're not thinking straight. You would have been credible if you'd have claimed you didn't know why Mueller took the position instead of coming up with possible reasons that at this point are no more than a conspiracy theory in your own mind.

Here are the facts:

- we don't know what the outcome of the Mueller investigation will be
- we don't know what the outcome of this so-called spygate will be
- you have decided this so-called spygate is the crime of the century
- you have decided that Mueller has nothing

- you seem unhinged

But if it makes you happy to believe and want and hope and pray that some of the players in this so-called spygate are going down and that Mueller is crooked then continue I guess. You truly do appear more and more unhinged as time goes on.


Edit: I just googled "Uranium One Investigation" and I can find nothing new than March of this year in terms of reporting on it. This must be a super top secret investigation. Can you point to just what is happening with said investigation?
74
post 1565344061 11-04-2018, 08:44 AM
-
#3314
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By PlanoLifter
You are so vested in this so-called spygate that you're not thinking straight. You would have been credible if you'd have claimed you didn't know why Mueller took the position instead of coming up with possible reasons that at this point are no more than a conspiracy theory in your own mind.

Here are the facts:

- we don't know what the outcome of the Mueller investigation will be
- we don't know what the outcome of this so-called spygate will be
- you have decided this so-called spygate is the crime of the century
- you have decided that Mueller has nothing

- you seem unhinged

But if it makes you happy to believe and want and hope and pray that some of the players in this so-called spygate are going down and that Mueller is crooked then continue I guess. You truly do appear more and more unhinged as time goes on.


Edit: I just googled "Uranium One Investigation" and I can find nothing new than March of this year in terms of reporting on it. This must be a super top secret investigation. Can you point to just what is happening with said investigation?
Sessions earlier this year mentioned in an interview that it was being investigated.

The Mueller investigation and Spygate are in direct opposition. Only 1 can be true. Either there was an elaborate scheme to spy on trump, and when they couldn't find any dirt, create a scandal with spygate... or trump actually colluded with Russia. Because all of the evidence points towards one, I think we can pretty confidently say Mueller has nothing.

All of the former IC heads, when interviewed under oath, said they had seen no obvious of collusion. Strzok texted page that there was no THERE there. Page said in her testimony that after 9 months they had nothing. The senate intel committee (Schiff, etc.) were leaking like mad trying to hurt trump... yet nothing on collusion.

But you're right, I'm sure it's there somewhere.
post 1565344341 11-04-2018, 08:50 AM
-
#3315
  1. miscinbro
  2. Registered User
  1. miscinbro
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 22,420
  6. Rep Power: 46435
Originally Posted By rampagefc77
When I say he was handed the counterintel case, that is exactly what happened.

Normally a special counsel is appointed, they do an investigation, they subpoena for phone and email records after going to a grand jury and proving probable cause, etc. The counterintel investigation had FISA warrants on Page and apparently papadapolous. That gives them records, including retrospectively, of all communications of that person and others within TWO HOPS of that person. Which would include basically everyone in the administration. All obtained by lying to a FISA court. We already know that there was widespread unmasking taking place, because all of those communications obtained through the FISA warrant would have the other person masked. They needed to know who was who so they could get to their real targets, hence the unmasking. We already know from testimony that Powers said that despite her name being on so many unmasking requests, she didn't sign off on them. So someone was fraudulently using her name in the process. Only a handful of people had authority to do so, it shouldn't be hard to get to the bottom of it.

This was all handed to Mueller-- he took over the counterintel investigation. He didn't need to conduct an investigation, go before a grand jury and prove his case as to why he should have records from xyz... he already hand them. He was tasked with finding a crime, and providing cover for what took place.

Why he did it? According to you, pure altruism and a sense of duty for his country? ...Right.
Let’s just focus in here for a second. You said Mueller was handed this when he knew it was wrong.

He then left private practice and took an enormous pay cut to do so. He also convinced several other partners from his former law firm to come with him.

You made the claim he was “handed” this. Why the fck would he and others do this? Please, provide any evidence.
post 1565344591 11-04-2018, 08:54 AM
-
#3316
  1. z4v4
  2. SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
  1. z4v4
  2. SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
  3. Join Date: May 2017
  4. Posts: 41,412
  5. Rep Power: 82451
Originally Posted By rampagefc77
Why he did it? According to you, pure altruism and a sense of duty for his country? ...Right.
Well, I'll tell ya what, it's a hell of a lot more plausible that a person of Mueller's background took the gig out of a duty for his country than you kooks who say Trump selflessly ran for president to save the world, lmao.
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."

z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"

Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."

z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?

Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
post 1565345451 11-04-2018, 09:13 AM
-
#3317
  1. PlanoLifter
  2. I lift therefore I am
  1. PlanoLifter
  2. I lift therefore I am
  3. Join Date: Oct 2014
  4. Location: Plano, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 7,423
  6. Rep Power: 103033
Originally Posted By rampagefc77
Sessions earlier this year mentioned in an interview that it was being investigated.

The Mueller investigation and Spygate are in direct opposition. Only 1 can be true. Either there was an elaborate scheme to spy on trump, and when they couldn't find any dirt, create a scandal with spygate... or trump actually colluded with Russia. Because all of the evidence points towards one, I think we can pretty confidently say Mueller has nothing.

All of the former IC heads, when interviewed under oath, said they had seen no obvious of collusion. Strzok texted page that there was no THERE there. Page said in her testimony that after 9 months they had nothing. The senate intel committee (Schiff, etc.) were leaking like mad trying to hurt trump... yet nothing on collusion.

But you're right, I'm sure it's there somewhere.
You're beginning to hallucinate. I have never claimed that anything was ever going to come from Mueller's investigation. In fact, I have claimed that I don't think Trump has anything to worry about. But, unlike you, I'm not going to make absolute assertions on the outcome based simply on what's publicly available. I'm going to wait and see.

Similarly, until all the facts in "spygate" are known I'm not going to claim it's the crime of the century.

It would seem that given we have heard very little about U-1 over the last 6 months that whatever investigation there might have been is probably now dead. I base this on the fact that we hear ongoing news from Mueller's investigation, from the so-called spygate investigation, but not from the U-1 investigation.

So I find your claim that Mueller took his position to shield his people and because of the U-1 deal to be nothing more than wishful thinking on your part. But if it makes you happy to think that Mueller is part of a big conspiracy, even though you made the claim that you don't subscribe to conspiracy theories, then who am I to stop you?

Edit: I reject your claim that only 1 can be true. There is no reason there couldn't have been an effort to spy on Trump while at the same time Trump could have been colluding. You're assuming that any spying efforts would have found collusion at the very time spying was going on. Why is this?
74
post 1565345961 11-04-2018, 09:23 AM
-
#3318
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By PlanoLifter
You're beginning to hallucinate. I have never claimed that anything was ever going to come from Mueller's investigation. In fact, I have claimed that I don't think Trump has anything to worry about. But, unlike you, I'm not going to make absolute assertions on the outcome based simply on what's publicly available. I'm going to wait and see.

Similarly, until all the facts in "spygate" are known I'm not going to claim it's the crime of the century.

It would seem that given we have heard very little about U-1 over the last 6 months that whatever investigation there might have been is probably now dead. I base this on the fact that we hear ongoing news from Mueller's investigation, from the so-called spygate investigation, but not from the U-1 investigation.

So I find your claim that Mueller took his position to shield his people and because of the U-1 deal to be nothing more than wishful thinking on your part. But if it makes you happy to think that Mueller is part of a big conspiracy, even though you made the claim that you don't subscribe to conspiracy theories, then who am I to stop you?
Look into the papadopolous interview I posted. It's an hour long, so it will take some patience. They outline multiple scenarios that allegedly started the entire crossfire hurricane counterintel investigation... and how each of them reeks of a setup. They used a guy named Charles tawil, a guy with known ties to western intelligence dating back to... you guessed it, the time that Mueller was running the FBI... to try to get Papa snagged in a money laundering scheme. Tawil reaches out to papa, hands him 10K, and expects him to bring it back to the US. Papa leaves the money overseas because he knows it's dirty. Guess who is arrested before customs without a warrant by the FBI as soon as he steps foot in the US? Papa. They thought he had the money, but he didn't. They arrest him, panic, show up late to court the next day, and ultimately papa walks. That is one of several times that Papa was set up, and coincidentally, the guy had ties to Mueller/western intel.

Whether Mueller knew or didn't know from the start that the operation was dirty, he would have HAD to have known after he reviewed everything. I stick to that assertion. We will see who is right.
post 1565347391 11-04-2018, 09:50 AM
-
#3319
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By PlanoLifter
Edit: I reject your claim that only 1 can be true. There is no reason there couldn't have been an effort to spy on Trump while at the same time Trump could have been colluding. You're assuming that any spying efforts would have found collusion at the very time spying was going on. Why is this?
As I just recently pointed out, everyone involved has denied that there was any evidence of collusion. These are people that go on CNN and rip Trump, but go under oath, hoping nothing more than to rip into trump, but having to say "no, I knew of no evidence of collusion." Even after 9 months of investigating, Page said there was no evidence.

Combined with the fact that leakers would have loved nothing more than to leak actual evidence of collusion... but nothing ever came out.

Combined with the fact that it seems very likely, based on papadapolous's account, that not only did they not have anything, but there was an active plot to SET UP trump team members to make it seem like they were colluding.

So everyone says there was nothing, leakers have produced no evidence of collusion, there is evidence that they actively tried to use western intel linked assets to frame trump members...

Seems like collusion must exist! Only logical conclusion.
post 1565498981 11-06-2018, 04:44 AM
-
#3320
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
To rejuvenate this thread, Q implied for months that there might have been more than 1 person with a FISA... then in August said manafort, Page. Papadapolus and Flynn all had fisas on them. Papadapolos basically just confirm this on twitter... how mueller went after everyone targeted by the FISA scheme to silence them. Papadapolus has been fighting back now as I’ve mentioned. He continues to drop more bombs on twitter. Definitely worth following.

And perhaps a lucky guess by Q that multiple people had FISAs.

I’ve never said that everything from Q has been 100% accurate, but still appears to be someone with some reasonably good sources to be able to consistently name names and events months ahead of time.
post 1565516221 11-06-2018, 09:14 AM
-
#3321
  1. PlanoLifter
  2. I lift therefore I am
  1. PlanoLifter
  2. I lift therefore I am
  3. Join Date: Oct 2014
  4. Location: Plano, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 7,423
  6. Rep Power: 103033
Originally Posted By rampagefc77
To rejuvenate this thread, Q implied for months that there might have been more than 1 person with a FISA... then in August said manafort, Page. Papadapolus and Flynn all had fisas on them. Papadapolos basically just confirm this on twitter... how mueller went after everyone targeted by the FISA scheme to silence them. Papadapolus has been fighting back now as I’ve mentioned. He continues to drop more bombs on twitter. Definitely worth following.

And perhaps a lucky guess by Q that multiple people had FISAs.

I’ve never said that everything from Q has been 100% accurate, but still appears to be someone with some reasonably good sources to be able to consistently name names and events months ahead of time.
This post seems like an act of desperation. It seems like you’re trying to convince yourself that your belief in Q is founded in reality.
74
post 1565517761 11-06-2018, 09:33 AM
-
#3322
  1. compan
  2. Tonight, we make soap.
  1. compan
  2. Tonight, we make soap.
  3. Join Date: Dec 2006
  4. Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
  5. Posts: 25,859
  6. Rep Power: 299450
So did something big drop that I'm not aware of? This Q thing is looking like a whole lot of nothing.
post 1565521681 11-06-2018, 10:12 AM
-
#3323
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By PlanoLifter
This post seems like an act of desperation. It seems like you’re trying to convince yourself that your belief in Q is founded in reality.
Did Q predict months in advance that there were multiple fisas, and even named who they were on? And was this confirmed by someone caught up in the mueller case, papadapolus?

How do you interpret that? Lucky guess? Could be.
post 1565523671 11-06-2018, 10:34 AM
-
#3324
  1. PlanoLifter
  2. I lift therefore I am
  1. PlanoLifter
  2. I lift therefore I am
  3. Join Date: Oct 2014
  4. Location: Plano, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 7,423
  6. Rep Power: 103033
Originally Posted By rampagefc77
Did Q predict months in advance that there were multiple fisas, and even named who they were on? And was this confirmed by someone caught up in the mueller case, papadapolus?

How do you interpret that? Lucky guess? Could be.
I’ve been told several times in this very thread that any information Q provides is already in the public domain. Which means that what he provides is not a prediction. Are you now saying you think Q is providing information before it’s in the public domain?
74
post 1565524621 11-06-2018, 10:43 AM
-
#3325
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By PlanoLifter
I’ve been told several times in this very thread that any information Q provides is already in the public domain. Which means that what he provides is not a prediction. Are you now saying you think Q is providing information before it’s in the public domain?
Sure looks that way.

So was he correct, or was he wrong?
post 1565526211 11-06-2018, 11:02 AM
-
#3326
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 46,410
  7. Rep Power: 219352
Has anyone from the deep state has been indicted? How about those two lovers who texted a bunch of mean things about Trump? Why oh why are they still walking free acting like they didn't commit a single crime? Oh that's right, because they haven't been indicated.

DUH
Early AM workout crew.
Holy crap dude, Satan's huge crew.
post 1565529661 11-06-2018, 11:35 AM
-
#3327
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  1. rampagefc77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 20,625
  6. Rep Power: 153167
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie
Has anyone from the deep state has been indicted? How about those two lovers who texted a bunch of mean things about Trump? Why oh why are they still walking free acting like they didn't commit a single crime? Oh that's right, because they haven't been indicated.

DUH
Maybe, maybe not. Flynn and papa were indicted and they are walking free.
post 1565532361 11-06-2018, 12:02 PM
-
#3328
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 46,410
  7. Rep Power: 219352
Originally Posted By rampagefc77
Maybe, maybe not. Flynn and papa were indicted and they are walking free.
For now...
Early AM workout crew.
Holy crap dude, Satan's huge crew.
post 1565539371 11-06-2018, 01:18 PM
-
#3329
  1. StoliFun
  2. Osawatomie John Brown
  1. StoliFun
  2. Osawatomie John Brown
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Location: Cypress, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 27,372
  6. Rep Power: 271790
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie
Has anyone from the deep state has been indicted? How about those two lovers who texted a bunch of mean things about Trump? Why oh why are they still walking free acting like they didn't commit a single crime? Oh that's right, because they haven't been indicated.

DUH
Dude, there are over 50,000 sealed indictments now. Trump is going to have to declare martial law and deploy the Marines to round them all up.
Heterologously Vaccinated Superior Race Crew

Kurt Russell, Ray Winstone, Mickey Rourke Crew

"The dominant economic order rests on unofficial dependency and official individualism. Survival requires the transposition of these two ideas: official solidarity and unofficial individualism."
post 1565548811 11-06-2018, 02:55 PM
-
#3330
  1. Skythes
  2. Order 66
  1. Skythes
  2. Order 66
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Posts: 7,234
  5. Rep Power: 6578
Still waiting on the promised ten billion sealed indictments, massive arrests in washington and wall street, imprisonment of obama and the clintons...

Could someone on the inside have leaked information to 4chan? Sure, but seems they didn't really know too much after all and were never high up. IMO the whole thing is a clever way of keeping cynical voters excited and riled up coming up to voting time. "Its definitely coming guys, just hang in there!"
"People have got to learn not to reply to trolls." - Noliberals4
"I would cut off ny right hand that Hillary is our next President." - rocker1
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts