Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Judge bars US from enforcing Trump administration asylum ban .. dafuq?
  1. Results 1 to 14 of 14
  2. Page 1 of 1

Thread: Judge bars US from enforcing Trump administration asylum ban .. dafuq?

post 1566694791 11-20-2018, 08:01 AM
-
#1
  1. friesbruh
  2. Registered User
  1. friesbruh
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2017
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 15,154
  7. Rep Power: 162706

Judge bars US from enforcing Trump administration asylum ban .. dafuq?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jud...ons-asylum-ban

Trump issued a proclamation on Nov. 9 that said anyone who crossed the southern border would be ineligible for asylum.

So let me get this straight. Dude can’t even take steps to secure our borders, to stop illegal immigration without some federal judge being “HOLD ON hold on guys it’s not fair to them” and now they’re showing up in van loads

Should be clear this judge gives zero fuks about the welfare of this country
Bills crew / Bud Light crew / extra onion crew / M&P crew / lcp2 crew / ap3 crew / Trump crew / mcdonalds app crew / cat-owner crew / Tin Cup crew / self-checkout crew / country music crew / RIP snails crew / 214CE crew
post 1566695551 11-20-2018, 08:09 AM
-
#2
  1. Tornach
  2. OG @ Castle Grayskull
  1. Tornach
  2. OG @ Castle Grayskull
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 16,159
  6. Rep Power: 51309
The judge lives in a walled in estate away from the plebs, in a bubble.
The judge will never see the parasites
Rustling NPCs' jimmies without even trying crew

"I've watched a lot of movies, I know what I'm doing."

"The Best Revenge is Massive Success"

Not going to be a Darkseeker crew.


RIP Duckenheimer
RIP SemperFudge
post 1566695601 11-20-2018, 08:09 AM
-
#3
  1. Dan_S
  2. Registered User
  1. Dan_S
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2009
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Age: 42
  6. Posts: 12,627
  7. Rep Power: 85920
Supreme Court already told the lower courts to knock chit like this off.

It'll be interesting to see if they do anything about it.
post 1566695661 11-20-2018, 08:10 AM
-
#4
  1. Matt413413
  2. Registered User
  1. Matt413413
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2018
  4. Age: 46
  5. Posts: 4,736
  6. Rep Power: 3073
Originally Posted By friesbruh⏩
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jud...ons-asylum-ban

Trump issued a proclamation on Nov. 9 that said anyone who crossed the southern border would be ineligible for asylum.

So let me get this straight. Dude can’t even take steps to secure our borders, to stop illegal immigration without some federal judge being “HOLD ON hold on guys it’s not fair to them” and now they’re showing up in van loads

Should be clear this judge gives zero fuks about the welfare of this country
That's because judges are all powerful.
post 1566695701 11-20-2018, 08:11 AM
-
#5
  1. friesbruh
  2. Registered User
  1. friesbruh
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2017
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 15,154
  7. Rep Power: 162706
Originally Posted By Dan_S⏩
Supreme Court already told the lower courts to knock chit like this off.

It'll be interesting to see if they do anything about it.
unaware

Good though
Bills crew / Bud Light crew / extra onion crew / M&P crew / lcp2 crew / ap3 crew / Trump crew / mcdonalds app crew / cat-owner crew / Tin Cup crew / self-checkout crew / country music crew / RIP snails crew / 214CE crew
post 1566695781 11-20-2018, 08:12 AM
-
#6
  1. iifymbro
  2. Registered User
  1. iifymbro
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 21,395
  7. Rep Power: 112562
the judicial branch has been getting tyrannical for awhile now, gunna be time for the other two branches to step in and knock them down a few pegs pretty soon
**MFC**
**Barbara Palvin is my 10/10 crew**
post 1566696121 11-20-2018, 08:16 AM
-
#7
  1. Ironmanlet
  2. Adamantium User
  1. Ironmanlet
  2. Adamantium User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Cajun Country
  5. Age: 40
  6. Height: 5'7"
  7. Weight: 185 lbs
  8. Posts: 52,357
  9. Subscribers: 5
  10. Rep Power: 415557
When you dumb down the situation to that level of unadulterated ignorance, it does justify your opposition to the idea.

Never be informed bro, just spew bull****.
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“

PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
post 1566696471 11-20-2018, 08:22 AM
-
#8
  1. midcoastking33
  2. Registered User
  1. midcoastking33
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2008
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 30,048
  6. Rep Power: 69010
another L for the trump administration
post 1566696581 11-20-2018, 08:24 AM
-
#9
  1. rainieravesouth
  2. So Fly My Ash is Lined Up
  1. rainieravesouth
  2. So Fly My Ash is Lined Up
  3. Join Date: Feb 2007
  4. Posts: 10,105
  5. Rep Power: 21207
It's called checks and balances.

This isn't a dictatorship. That way dumb chit can't be passed.
- Rep "super stupid jeans" pics on sight
post 1566697181 11-20-2018, 08:30 AM
-
#10
  1. MrAWatts
  2. Cellphone elitist
  1. MrAWatts
  2. Cellphone elitist
  3. Join Date: Apr 2009
  4. Location: Dallas, Texas, United States
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 23,428
  7. Rep Power: 132228
Checks and balances, boyos. We have them specifically so we don't end up with an angry orange toddler wandering into the oval office and shtting on democracy.
535 deadlift.
*If you can't lift it without straps you can't lift it crew
*Morrowind is the best game of all time crew
*Double everything Chipotle Crew
*Style crew
*Sig line can't be a novel crew
post 1566697691 11-20-2018, 08:36 AM
-
#11
  1. JRMoore82
  2. Super straight crew
  1. JRMoore82
  2. Super straight crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Location: Phoenix, Arizona, United States
  5. Posts: 22,017
  6. Rep Power: 102424
Originally Posted By rainieravesouth⏩
It's called checks and balances.

This isn't a dictatorship. That way dumb chit can't be passed.
Checks and balances also mean others can’t over step their boundaries (ie when trump issues a travel ban within his legal limits and some judges get all activist on us and the Supreme Court has to bitch slap the judges for it).

Asylum must be seeked at first country which the caravan has already passed.
post 1566700391 11-20-2018, 09:13 AM
-
#12
  1. gibbypoo
  2. 💙💚💛
  1. gibbypoo
  2. 💙💚💛
  3. Join Date: Jun 2010
  4. Posts: 3,606
  5. Rep Power: 4590
Asylum has special accommodations. You can't just revoke that because some goober doesn't like brown people
post 1566700471 11-20-2018, 09:15 AM
-
#13
  1. SirFapsAIot
  2. YEAH YOU MAD
  1. SirFapsAIot
  2. YEAH YOU MAD
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 37,166
  5. Rep Power: 430786
Originally Posted By gibbypoo⏩
Asylum has special accommodations. You can't just revoke that because some goober doesn't like brown people
eat my fukkin poo, gibby
post 1566700801 11-20-2018, 09:20 AM
-
#14
  1. Dan_S
  2. Registered User
  1. Dan_S
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2009
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Age: 42
  6. Posts: 12,627
  7. Rep Power: 85920
Originally Posted By friesbruh⏩
unaware

Good though
It's kind of a pain looking through old SC rulings, but here's an article:

In Travel Ban Ruling, Justice Thomas Takes Aim At Nationwide Injunctions

Below quote is directly from Thomas' ruling.
Injunctions that prohibit the Executive Branch from applying a law or policy against anyone…have become increasingly common. District courts, including the one here, have begun imposing universal injunctions without considering their authority to grant such sweeping relief. These injunctions are beginning to take a toll on the federal court system—preventing legal questions from percolating through the federal courts, encouraging forum shopping, and making every case a national emergency for the courts and for the Executive Branch.

I am skeptical that district courts have the authority to enter universal injunctions. These injunctions did not emerge until a century and a half after the founding. And they appear to be inconsistent with longstanding limits on equitable relief and the power of Article III courts. If their popularity continues, this Court must address their legality.
R&P section ---->>>
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts