That guy needs to murder his ex wife (srs). She’s ruining his sons life. Make her go away. Sacrifice yourself for your son. Might be too late now.

Yep Moscow. We’re in one of the best if not the best districts for schools

Not sure how Russia is poverty after the collapse of the union I’ve seen wealth there the likes of which I’ve never seen anywhere else

But the state is socially conservative and there are laws against this kind of propaganda

yes, of course. WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG WITH DELAYING PUBERTY IN A MALE

Poor kid is going to end up a frame-let with a weird eunuch build if his psycho cnt mom is allowed to live out her Munchhausens through him

We welcome you into the club.

Lol

Plenty of guns in Texas to take care of this piece of **** mom.Sand*****nt bringing his ***gotry into main Misc now.

That you satan worshiping heathens want to cut off the penis' of young men and drink the blood? Yes, you could say that.

What if they turn into the Raiders in Fallout?

I considered myself liberal too, until I realized there really wasn't a difference between Bush and Obama other than their public speaking ability. I sincerely hope one or more viable parties emerge soon. The country is ready. We're being held hostage by the two largest criminal organizations in the country.

I was thinking of a solution, and you named it.

Would do this 100%.

Or buy a boat and sail to Cuba with son

Or just completely abscond, and live as a fugitive in the mountains with son. fuk school, better dumb than castrated.

Or buy new IDs, and completely disappear from the system, spend a whole year changing identities and moving, then move to another country with fake ID

6 yr olds
Can’t drive
Can’t vote
Can’t drink
Can’t get a bank account
Can’t reproduce

But




They can make life long, irreversible decisions on genitalia removal

Gotta love the high and mighty rational "skeptics" in the thread saying this is fake news...



This is how they argue. First they say it's fake, fear mongering, etc. When you prove it's not fake, that's when the "Why do you care so much? Why are youobsessedwith it?" argument comes out.

http://savejames.com/wp-content/uplo...-Georgulas.pdf
http://savejames.com/wp-content/uplo..._Dossier-2.pdf

reinforces my choice to not get married or have kids even more srs

This degeneracy is spreading. Fuking disgusting.

I can say with 100% certainly that if I was the father and I ended up losing this court case, I would pay to have her taken care of before any of it went ahead. I would do absolutely anything to save my son, even if it meant trading in my freedom or life. There's no way in hell it'd happen.

I definitely could be wrong and I often am, but it still looks shady AF and reading the court papers it seems the father is purposely ignoring the court's orders. It's like the Father is trying to over correct and is making things worse for everyone.


Also she changed her website and she's being eaten alive in the Google reviews--so this is gaining momentum --->http://www.drannemd.com/

Imagine this awful chit from delayed puberty

http://www.cracked.com/personal-expe...h-puberty.html

combined with mentally ill degenerates pushing you to cut off your own dick at a vulnerable teenager

But it's 'no big thing'

On reading the article, I got the same vibe I got when that story passed around a few years ago about a guy in the UK supposedly being imprisoned for shooting burglars in self-defence; it turned out he had previously shot at passers-by and lost his firearms license, that he had hosted meetings of fascist groups who wanted to commit genocide against gypsies, and when gypsy burglars came they were unarmed, saw him and ran away and he chased them down and shot them in the back. But the Conservative Justice Warriors didn't mention that part; the story was the truth, but not the whole truth. I'm getting the same vibe from this story.

So if you know the whole story, what is it? The part that's publicly available in court filings, I mean. Because so far as I could see, the article only links to this -http://savejames.com/wp-content/uplo...-Georgulas.pdf- which is the mother's petition, without response from the father, or evidence of third parties, eg court psychologist interviews of the child.

Mostly it just looks like the ordinary shtfight parents get into over kids, using them as tools to hurt each-other. The restraining order supporting docs mention the dad never being interested in the kids' school stuff before, but now he's interested, oh and don't tell the school Luna is actually James (I think they will have figured it out themselves).

The court order said,In other words: "Leave it up to the kid for now, and don't shttalk about the other parent in front of the kid." So the courts seem reasonable so far, but it looks like the kid is just a weapon for them to bash each-other with. Well, that happens in bitter divorces.

Yeah but every one hates gypos tho

As the logo for her pediatric clinic states, she is a proponent of "modern" parenting, which means that there was an a priori openness, or even willingness, on her behalf to the idea of eventually raising a gender-nonconforming child. If you are not familiarized with Alice Miller and the concept of modern parenting, it contrasts with conventional parenting in that in the latter the parents are in charge of the child and try to guide the child through life, until it reaches maturity. Modern parenting means setting as little boundaries as possible to the child and letting them decide everything for themselves, the parents' main role being that of advisors (not enforcers) and to assure that the child's desires and aspirations are met. Don't want to eat the cauliflower? Fine! Don't want to kiss grandma and grandpa on the cheek? Fine! Don't want to clean up your toys? Fine! Modern parenting has some positive aspects, namely when related to matters of body autonomy (no child circumcision, no spanking, etc.) but it's extremely irresponsible in spreading the idea that children are angelic beings that get corrupted by society into becoming selfish and cruel (Rosseau's "Noble Savage"), which contrasts with the Hobbesian view that children are essentially selfish little beasts who need to be civilized by parents and school, in order to be functioning members of society. But the main issue is that it is the children who suffer the most from this irresponsible parenting:https://www.thechildrensbookreview.c...helan-phd.html

Second, from a purelyspeculativepoint of view, being a doctor with a transgender child will increase her reputation in the medical community and the LGBT community, which will invariably translate into a higher revenue for her clinic and a semi-celebrity status for herself. She can write books describing her "struggle", she can go on Ellen Degeneres and be described as a "brave single mom who stood up against the hateful Patriarchy", she can even sell the rights for an Hollywood biopic (where the father will inevitably be portrayed by Timothy Spall or John Carroll Lynch).

Statement from Dr. Anne:



"My child deserves respect and privacy, not to be exploited for personal or financial gain."

Says the woman who decorates her clinic's website and ******** with pictures of her child.

"The news reports and other information posted on the internet about my child are inaccurate. But I am not going to respond to the many lies, omissions, and mischaracterizations about my child because the appropriate place to address this matter is in court, which I am fully prepared to do. I respectfully ask that you give my family privacy."

She'll let us know, in due time and in the proper place, why the father and the dozens of witnesses, including relatives, who swear James is a normal boy, are all lying transphobes.Those google reviews..

The confusion about the father supposedly having to pay for sex reassignment stuff has probably come from the fact that the parents are required to jointly pay for the counsellor the kid's seeing. So long as it's a good counsellor I can only see that as a good thing. That's a big caveat, though.

There really need to be classes or something for parents on how to split up and not turn into festering knobjockeys. Or better yet, not split up. The religious traditions where you have to go to classes on marriage before that religious minister will marry you - honestly, there's some sense in that.

As a side note, it was jarring to be able to publicly read the kid's name and see their picture; in Australia, the identities of minors involved in court matters, whether custody disputes or as the victims or perpetrators of crimes, are suppressed. I think that's for the best. I don't think the public needs to know the name and face of the children involved. We need to know there's a case and what's happening in it, but not the name and face. This is particularly so in the age of the internet; in twelve years the child will be a legal adult and can decide for themselves who they want to tell intimate details of their childhood and family to, publication takes that decision away from them.

JFK paraphrased Chesterton when he wrote: “Don’t ever take a fence down until you know the reason why it was put up." Nowadays there's this push for "breaking the taboos" and the taboos are always portrayed as being arbitrary chit that our ancestors came up with, for no good reason. Rules don't exist just to control us, as they say, some rules exist to protect us. Sometimes from our own selves.That's the reason why I didn't post surnames. Although it's hard to care for a child's privacy when his own parents splash the internet with photos of him.

In Australia, the parents and guardians are also legally restrained from posting about their children, if they're involved in some legal stuff. Because let's face it, it never helps.

But the US also publishes names of jurors and lets them write books about their court experience, so it's weird in many ways.

damn my family might have been together if I was in Aus then...

brb USA its a bloodbath in court with manipulation after manipulation

I mean, the article/thread is obviously a game of telephone gone wrong - kid slated to go to gender counselling or whatever => article says the site in which counselling takes place also does chemical castrations => OP claims child is not only undergoing castration but that dad will have to pay for it.

but the whole concept of sending a kid to "gender counselling" when he doesn't even know what's on his piss is repulsive anyways, to an extent I get that someone who turns out LGBT will probably show tendencies early but trying to pry open someone's orientation before he/she even learns how to jerk is fukkin retarded and I wouldn't be surprised if the mother is leveraging the openness to have the kid for herself.

Thanks for the mod neg brah