Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» What are your thoughts on redpill theory?
  1. Results 61 to 90 of 102
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. Last
post 1576305931 03-21-2019, 07:56 AM
-
#61
  1. clean2
  2. Banned
  1. clean2
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 21
  6. Rep Power: 0
Red pill actually doesn't go far enough. It applies to life as a whole, not only girls.

Red pill fact #1. Everyone else looks out for their self interest. If you're a nice guy who plays by the rules, you're putting yourself at a huge disadvantage.

Red pill fact #2. How well you do in life is primarily determined by factors outside of your control, that is to say luck, not hard work. However, you have no control over your luck, you have full control over how hard you work. It's about hard work from an actionable perspective but not from a results perspective.
post 1576306061 03-21-2019, 07:58 AM
-
#62
  1. Kirra
  2. Registered User
  1. Kirra
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Location: Norway
  5. Posts: 9,510
  6. Rep Power: 38728
Originally Posted By HomerJThompson
Not this again, of course they are less horny. Just because they are horny in relationships doesnt mean they are equally as horny as guys. If they were as horny as guys, women would have 100s of partners in their lifetime.
They are just as horny lmao, they're just more selective with who get's to see that side of them.
*Fat Kunt Krew (FKK)* President: Alan Aragon
*C2H6O is the only macro that counts crew*
*4th of October Victim Krew*
*Neg incels for fun crew*
post 1576306111 03-21-2019, 07:58 AM
-
#63
  1. Brozart
  2. dunno
  1. Brozart
  2. dunno
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
  5. Posts: 27,524
  6. Rep Power: 313692
Originally Posted By redraider86
I agree. It's kind of silly to need a word for a theory that essentially says that people look out for themselves, and I guess women are people so let's call it being red-pilled. I also think feminism can be incredibly toxic, or any other group who at their core, believes they are mistreated because of who they inherently are. I think it's reasonable for men to hear feminists talk about patriarchy and think, 'Wait a minute. If patriarchy is about privileging me, why does my life suck?'

Feminism mostly benefits women, and historically there hasn't really be a comparable effective movement for men that really focuses on how many of our systems destroy and vilify men. My issue with red pill/MGTOW/MRA stuff is that they mostly challenge feminists, rather than other men, and thus are quite ineffective. Look at how men on the misc are often treated by other men when they talk about asking for help with their emotions, going to therapy, dealing with domestic abuse, sexual abuse or assault, etc. It's a tragedy. This is the true toxic masculinity we should all be concerned about: The idea that masculinity and suffering and asking for and getting help cannot exist in the same world.
True.

One of the biggest social differences between men and women is the support network. Generally, if you're a woman you'll never be without one; if you're a man you need to be lucky and careful, because no one gives a chit about a man who's down on his luck.

I don't know if your point about their not being a comparable "men's rights movement" historically, as there are at least a couple of points that muddle the question. One, the comparable historical movements that have worked for and benefitted men's rights haven't been men's rights movements, they're typically human rights movements - inclusion of the rights of others doesn't nullify your own. Also, the inequality of advantages has really only become relevant in recent years. Prior to the late 20th century, sure men were "destroyed and vilified", but women had comparable, or arguably worse, issues.

The thing that creates the feelings of disadvantage is not that one group has issues and the other doesn't, it's that the issues of one group are highlighted, and lately this has been at the hand of the ultimate modern authority - the courts.
fukn Brozart
I'm a hugger
post 1576306311 03-21-2019, 08:01 AM
-
#64
  1. doughnutking
  2. The Booty Warrior
  1. doughnutking
  2. The Booty Warrior
  3. Join Date: Apr 2011
  4. Posts: 23,440
  5. Rep Power: 97706
Originally Posted By Brozart
the majority of its followers are completely fukn retarded and just use it to cope.
This is why i never gave the time of day to reading anything about it
Originally Posted By maciejmuta
What does having a long term girlfriend have to do with understanding what the concept of being redpilled means?
I didn't understand the concept because i'd never read about it, hence why i made the thread. I already understand women, how to get a girlfriend, how to keep her without fear of her running off with a Chad who's built like a brick chit house with a 12" cock and a Lambo, and since i've started reading about it i realise i was already "red pilled" a long time ago, but i never called it "red pill" just common sense.

When i made this thread i assumed the "red pill" was a congregation of young "beta" males who are mad at the world because they cannot get a girlfriend and who formed a group on reddit, but of course i am now awared and understand there is a lot more to it than a subbreddit of neckbeards.

I assumed that the only reason you would read about "red pill" theory is if you couldn't get a girlfriend and since i've never had this problem i'd never read about it for the same reason ive never read a book on how to treat back problems because i've never had a bad back.
post 1576306911 03-21-2019, 08:13 AM
-
#65
  1. JGats
  2. Registered User
  1. JGats
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2014
  4. Posts: 2,268
  5. Rep Power: 11309
Originally Posted By Brozart
True.

One of the biggest social differences between men and women is the support network. Generally, if you're a woman you'll never be without one; if you're a man you need to be lucky and careful, because no one gives a chit about a man who's down on his luck.

I don't know if your point about their not being a comparable "men's rights movement" historically, as there are at least a couple of points that muddle the question. One, the comparable historical movements that have worked for and benefitted men's rights haven't been men's rights movements, they're typically human rights movements - inclusion of the rights of others doesn't nullify your own. Also, the inequality of advantages has really only become relevant in recent years. Prior to the late 20th century, sure men were "destroyed and vilified", but women had comparable, or arguably worse, issues.

The thing that creates the feelings of disadvantage is not that one group has issues and the other doesn't, it's that the issues of one group are highlighted, and lately this has been at the hand of the ultimate modern authority - the courts.
I think you meant to reply to:
Originally Posted By redraider86
I agree. It's kind of silly to need a word for a theory that essentially says that people look out for themselves, and I guess women are people so let's call it being red-pilled. I also think feminism can be incredibly toxic, or any other group who at their core, believes they are mistreated because of who they inherently are. I think it's reasonable for men to hear feminists talk about patriarchy and think, 'Wait a minute. If patriarchy is about privileging me, why does my life suck?'

Feminism mostly benefits women, and historically there hasn't really be a comparable effective movement for men that really focuses on how many of our systems destroy and vilify men. My issue with red pill/MGTOW/MRA stuff is that they mostly challenge feminists, rather than other men, and thus are quite ineffective. Look at how men on the misc are often treated by other men when they talk about asking for help with their emotions, going to therapy, dealing with domestic abuse, sexual abuse or assault, etc. It's a tragedy. This is the true toxic masculinity we should all be concerned about: The idea that masculinity and suffering and asking for and getting help cannot exist in the same world.
Good point on helping fellow men. We as men are largely competitive and do not provide a support network for each other. I believe that is a result of a patriarchal society, though, which places higher value on women.

Feminism is a misnomer but they bring up a number of good points. Namely, that women are treated far better and valued more in society. It's a misnomer because they don't advocate for women's rights; they don't need to. They advocate for themselves, the vast number of unattractive women in society that are treated worse than their beautiful, young, attractive counterparts. Because those are the women that are desired and sought after. And that's "just not fair."
post 1576308171 03-21-2019, 08:34 AM
-
#66
  1. OddFix
  2. Registered User
  1. OddFix
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 62
  6. Rep Power: 0
Late to the party but I feel like I have some info to add.

I think that red pill theory is correct for the most part and on the base of it is very honest & real. The reason why you think it attracts a lot of beta *******s is because a lot of them who get into RP are newbies who find out what it is and they're currently in the bitter/anger stage because they've been lied to. Blue Pill is denial & acceptance while Red Pill is anger at beginning & bargaining with lifting afterwards. This is why you see a lot of **** dudes around; because they transitioned from BP -> RP and now they're pissed and think they're so full of wisdom.

Modern TRP is kind of a washed down version of red pill from a couple of years ago anyway and has a lot of LARPers, so it's not really a wonder why people think it's necessarily bad. I don't go on there anymore and when I found out about it the first time around 2013, it didn't surprise me much because it was already about things that I knew already confirming my beliefs. It has some *******s who make it look bad, such as Roosh, who completely embarrassed himself on TV, but some people like GayLubeOil are a hilarious treasure. If you wanna have a laugh, go read some GayLubeOil posts.

PS: It's hard to deny RP when lots of guys envy & worship two biggest red pill characters which are Zyzz & Dan Bilzerian. Both were sort of losers who went Dark Triad and then had bitches drooling after them.
post 1576312771 03-21-2019, 09:48 AM
-
#67
  1. Brozart
  2. dunno
  1. Brozart
  2. dunno
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
  5. Posts: 27,524
  6. Rep Power: 313692
Originally Posted By JGats
I think you meant to reply to:
Ha, true. Originally I just did a ^ but by the time I'd finished a bunch of people had posted; guess I just scrolled up and quoted the first big post.

And yeah, it's really a distraction, the whole men vs. women thing. First we'd need to fix men vs men and women vs women.
fukn Brozart
I'm a hugger
post 1576313051 03-21-2019, 09:52 AM
-
#68
  1. Chezdon
  2. Vagabond
  1. Chezdon
  2. Vagabond
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Location: London, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 40
  6. Posts: 13,184
  7. Rep Power: 13479
Originally Posted By JewSeeJohn
Redpill to me is that people only really care about your looks, money, and status; with SUPERB confidence generally being the result of an individual achieving success in these aspects, or just being dark triad.

None of that chemical 'spark' or personality sh*t has anything to do with attraction
That's simply not true. Chemistry, sparks, personality all play a huge part. I've attracted my fair share of girls from making them laugh. Helps I'm aesthetic, yes. But without the laughter there wouldn't be the feels. Also, it's about being mysterious whilst also being caring/sensitive. Trying to find the right balance between a bad boy who doesn't give a fuk and someone who's attentive. Show them you're sexual but don't look desperate. Maybe it's easier to get away with if you're a chad.
Originally Posted By smashedurgfx10
your concept is correct

however in reality it doesn't pan out like that

men are much less selective than women, and we desire sex more than women

because of this even if these high value guys could technically obtain the top tier women, they usually settle for a couple of points lower because they're horny and just want to bust a nut

this has been made worse because women's standards skyrocketed with the advent of social media and online dating

now women never date down, only up, and men are limited to same level.or below

you'll almost always have to date down as a man because women's standards won't allow it any other way.
The things is, it's completely dependent on if we're talking ONS or a lengthy relationship. Different goals require different methods. For a ONS yes, we men will take a few points lower.

I still think women date down (in terms of looks). In the end they have to, as usually there are more better looking women than men. But then those men who aren't as good looking will have money/security etc.
post 1576313941 03-21-2019, 10:06 AM
-
#69
  1. daghetto
  2. Registered User
  1. daghetto
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2009
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 992
  6. Rep Power: 1225
Originally Posted By ErnieMccracken
Looking at objectively, it seems so unbelievably stupid that most of society used to believe that these sloots were naturally loyal and virtuous lol. Then again, half the people on earth still believe in magic sky fairies, too.
Lol wtf, guys are way more unloyal than girls. I’ve got friends and know lots of guys who **** around with multiple women even in relationships.
post 1576314951 03-21-2019, 10:18 AM
-
#70
  1. Silencespeaks
  2. Banned
  1. Silencespeaks
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Posts: 114,138
  5. Rep Power: 0
Post deleted by user
post 1576315561 03-21-2019, 10:25 AM
-
#71
  1. calvesbr0
  2. Registered User
  1. calvesbr0
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Posts: 949
  5. Rep Power: 9183
Originally Posted By daghetto
Lol wtf, guys are way more unloyal than girls. I’ve got friends and know lots of guys who **** around with multiple women even in relationships.
It's the 80/20 rule. The dudes in the 20% phuck around and smash while the potentially loyal dudes probably aren't getting any lmao
post 1576315891 03-21-2019, 10:29 AM
-
#72
  1. Aristotelian
  2. Positive Mental Attitude
  1. Aristotelian
  2. Positive Mental Attitude
  3. Join Date: Jun 2017
  4. Posts: 12,849
  5. Rep Power: 263689
Honestly a lot of posts here seem to warp the "red pill" concept into specific claims when rather the red pill is fairly general.

The "red pill" has nothing to do with X's specific inability to get laid. It is instead about the fact that issues faced by males for a long time are disregarded either deliberately or out of ignorance.

Good examples of this are physical abuse cases that men face from women, including statutory rape and more, which are deliberately gaslighted by certain interest groups who rapidly become uncomfortable when faced with those facts.

Those facts range from physical, sexual and emotional abuse to the way that society has been founded on treating certain categories and or classes of men as being disposable. Men are culpable in this too but not singularly responsible.

The general problem is that interest groups try to remain "relevant" by shooting down other causes. Support centers for males who have been abused does not necessarily entail that the abuse of women is not an important issue, and yet so many interest groups portray the suffering of women as paramount.

Boko Haram slaughter hundreds of boys? "Victims". They kidnap women/girls? "Women and girls". There are plenty of examples of this in international affairs and it is pathetic. This is what the "red pill" is for: being able to see the world as it is rather than being force fed ideologies by interest groups who are fundamentally biased.
post 1576316681 03-21-2019, 10:40 AM
-
#73
  1. umadbroski
  2. Sickening kunt
  1. umadbroski
  2. Sickening kunt
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Location: Mexico
  5. Age: 32
  6. Posts: 13,110
  7. Rep Power: 48610
Originally Posted By GravityLee
I have known several guy friends that did well with women to the point of being a ladies man or womanizer. Some of them do end up old and alone believe it or not. The reason is really simple. If you have a few things going for you, you can bang women 20-30 years younger sometimes well adjusted women mostly mentally ill daddy issues women. So you think those are what you can get. Youre the man right? Wrong. None of those women want to just fuk you for the next 50 years, have your kids and not sue for child/spousal support, change your diapers cause youre fukin old while they are still mentally and physically healthy. Theres this wierd paradox where being the “fukin man” makes you box yourself into a bad situation, namely picking between being alone or the scenario i just mentioned. You pick option 3 right? A girl 10-15 years younger whos a good person on the inside? Doesnt really happen because men like this dont see the light.
so yeah, just marry because of the fear of ending up alone.
vegan bodybuilder crew
software engineers crew
mexican manmore crew
L.A. Rams crew
post 1576317711 03-21-2019, 10:51 AM
-
#74
  1. severagee
  2. Registered User
  1. severagee
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,529
  6. Rep Power: 16879
Objectively true to a degree (even my ex said so when I showed her the page), but a LOT of people take it way too far and forget that women are human just like men, and are capable of being loyal and virtuous, especially if they were raised well. I am fond of their advocacy for constant personal improvement however, and for behaving in stereotypically strong, masculine ways.

I will say that while Redpill theory may work for slooty women/degenerates looking for one night stands, it is not conducive to forming meaningful, committed relationships with quality women. I feel like the average redpiller is trying to attract club and rave thots who are largely incapable of commitment in the first place.
Dental Student crew
post 1576321311 03-21-2019, 11:33 AM
-
#75
  1. arod204
  2. Banned
  1. arod204
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2014
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 4,389
  6. Rep Power: 0
My thoughts: a cynical view almost never leads to a happy or positive life. Subscribe at your own risk just know the end result is living a life without love dying alone, being insecure, and seeing the worst in everyone.
post 1576322421 03-21-2019, 11:51 AM
-
#76
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 11,550
  6. Rep Power: 58418
Red Pill is for sure 100% true. I went from a kissless virgin dweeb to pounding sloots left and right. Everything you learned growing up about how to treat women is BS. Red pill truths:


- looks matter. Strength matters. Lift and be attractive.
- assertiveness matters. Don’t back down to her ideas or opinions. If you never say you’re sorry then the other party will eventually assume they are in the wrong. Trump follows this rule srs and it’s why he gets away with everything
- you’re the captain. Be decisive, take control, lead in everything. Women say they want equality in a relationship. They don’t.
- the red pill applies to everyone. This in my experience is also true. Losers say it just attracts sloots. Nope. Religious women, professional women, trashy women, works on all of them
- have you’re own mission. Make women secondary. Do interesting things and have interesting hobbies.


None of the stuff is earth shattering unless raised by Disney. Personality means dick.
post 1576327651 03-21-2019, 01:01 PM
-
#77
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By doughnutking
I know next to nothing about redpill theory as i have a long term girlfriend and it's not something i've ever looked into or read about.

I've recently met a couple of guys who are 100% redpill. Both are successful and are not even close to being incels, in fact they are the complete opposite.

So what is the story? Is the redpill gaining traction with men in general or is it predominantly a neckbeard redditor movement?

Aware me
It is largely true.

For a long time there's been this idea that women are "nice" and "sensitive" and most aren't. I believe most women are less kind and sensitive than men and when men realize this, it's like a mind explosion.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1576387621 03-22-2019, 08:22 AM
-
#78
  1. alltrapbrah
  2. Registered User
  1. alltrapbrah
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 8,035
  6. Rep Power: 42639
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian
It is largely true.

For a long time there's been this idea that women are "nice" and "sensitive" and most aren't. I believe most women are less kind and sensitive than men and when men realize this, it's like a mind explosion.
Kind of agree, but I don't wanna go as far as saying that men are nicer.

What I will say is that women definitely aren't as "saintly" as they are often made out to be, and men aren't as bigger kents as everyone seems to think they are.
post 1576391541 03-22-2019, 09:17 AM
-
#79
  1. MuscleMorse
  2. Registered User
  1. MuscleMorse
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 193
  6. Rep Power: 318
Originally Posted By Chezdon
Ugly guys can get women, they just can't get top tier women (in the way you probably want).

Rich, successful, confident men, get most of the women.

Humour is also a huge weapon.

Top 10% men have it MUCH better than women. There are so many ways to succeed as a man. If you have ONE of the attributes desirable to women you can have some fun. Looks, money, confidence, humour.

If you're a woman you HAVE to be good looking. Any less and you'll struggle and get the bottom of the barrel guys.

I'd deliriously happy that I'm male and white. Even more so that I'm aesthetic and aryan. Life on easy mode brah.
Fixed for you.

LOL. The bottom 5% of women have more options pursuing them than the average man. It doesn't matter how unfukkable a woman is, there will be men so starved of intimacy, she will have men to choose from.

In terms of sex and relationships

men < women. and it's not even close.
post 1576391971 03-22-2019, 09:23 AM
-
#80
  1. MuscleMorse
  2. Registered User
  1. MuscleMorse
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 193
  6. Rep Power: 318
Originally Posted By redraider86
I agree. It's kind of silly to need a word for a theory that essentially says that people look out for themselves, and I guess women are people so let's call it being red-pilled. I also think feminism can be incredibly toxic, or any other group who at their core, believes they are mistreated because of who they inherently are. I think it's reasonable for men to hear feminists talk about patriarchy and think, 'Wait a minute. If patriarchy is about privileging me, why does my life suck?'

Feminism mostly benefits women, and historically there hasn't really be a comparable effective movement for men that really focuses on how many of our systems destroy and vilify men. My issue with red pill/MGTOW/MRA stuff is that they mostly challenge feminists, rather than other men, and thus are quite ineffective. Look at how men on the misc are often treated by other men when they talk about asking for help with their emotions, going to therapy, dealing with domestic abuse, sexual abuse or assault, etc. It's a tragedy. This is the true toxic masculinity we should all be concerned about: The idea that masculinity and suffering and asking for and getting help cannot exist in the same world.
Women always have to penetrate male spaces. The red pill istoopainful so we have to neuter it and create a more easy to swallow version and name it purple pill that more caters to our needs since it's all about us.

Dafuq has asking for help got to do with the redpill? The red pill is undesirable truths that the MSM or conventional wisdom ignores or outright lies about.
post 1576392391 03-22-2019, 09:29 AM
-
#81
  1. ErnieMccracken
  1. ErnieMccracken
  2. Join Date: Nov 2013
  3. Posts: 100,062
  4. Rep Power: 330290
Originally Posted By MuscleMorse
Fixed for you.

LOL. The bottom 5% of women have more options pursuing them than the average man. It doesn't matter how unfukkable a woman is, there will be men so starved of intimacy, she will have men to choose from.

In terms of sex and relationships

men < women. and it's not even close.
You can be an old divorced sloot who trolls for attention on an all male bodybuilding forum and still get wk'd. Imagine if the genders were reversed.
post 1576392641 03-22-2019, 09:33 AM
-
#82
  1. eod8989
  2. All honked out
  1. eod8989
  2. All honked out
  3. Join Date: Aug 2014
  4. Posts: 58,435
  5. Rep Power: 81966
Originally Posted By MuscleMorse
Fixed for you.

LOL. The bottom 5% of women have more options pursuing them than the average man. It doesn't matter how unfukkable a woman is, there will be men so starved of intimacy, she will have men to choose from.

In terms of sex and relationships

men < women. and it's not even close.
Yeah women's basic needs are being met while men's are not. It's so messed up since this isn't how it used to be traditionally. The traditional life of the 50's and 60's was far more natural than what is going on now. It's a mess.
PC specs

i9 9900k/AMD RX 6800 16 GB/16 GB RAM/LG BX 65'' OLED/Gigabyte GS27QC 27''



OLED Master Race crew
1440p 120+ fps only crew
6'2 master race crew
Audiophile crew
Metal crew
Introvert/INTJ crew
German crew
If you aren't getting stronger you aren't getting bigger crew
post 1576392801 03-22-2019, 09:36 AM
-
#83
  1. TBO1313
  2. Never Registered
  1. TBO1313
  2. Never Registered
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Posts: 28,898
  5. Rep Power: 342064
Originally Posted By redraider86
Look at how men on the misc are often treated by other men when they talk about asking for help with their emotions, going to therapy, dealing with domestic abuse, sexual abuse or assault, etc. It's a tragedy. This is the true toxic masculinity we should all be concerned about: The idea that masculinity and suffering and asking for and getting help cannot exist in the same world.
What harm could possibly come from telling vulnerable people reaching out for help that they need to sack up and push those emotions deep down inside?
6'2"

OMAD results: 2/15/19-235, 10/13/19-190

OHP-205 Bench- 245 Squat - 405 C&J - 245

2021 Spring cut: 195lbs starting weight
post 1576394671 03-22-2019, 10:05 AM
-
#84
  1. 78novacaine
  2. Registered User
  1. 78novacaine
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2019
  4. Posts: 15,477
  5. Rep Power: 176552
Originally Posted By Smob3
Then go ask random chicks for sex and see what your success rate is
Causation /=/ correlation

Women don't turn down sex with rando's more than men do because they aren't as horny. They turn it down because they typically have more options and can afford to be more selective with whom they choose to f*ck. Most women, even 2's and 3's (IRL, not misc standards), typically have at least 1-2 brahs that they can call on when they want some d*ck at any given point.

Cliffs: women like to f*ck as much or more than men, they are just fkng Chad or Tyrone instead of YOU...
Permabulk/bloatlord Crew
Tradie Crew
HTC
post 1576396191 03-22-2019, 10:23 AM
-
#85
  1. John$Galt
  2. Banned
  1. John$Galt
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: Suck a fart out of my ass after I eat some, Chile
  5. Posts: 15,790
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By daghetto
Lol wtf, guys are way more unloyal than girls. I’ve got friends and know lots of guys who **** around with multiple women even in relationships.
Maybe, maybe not. Tough to tell. Regardless, it's much worse when a woman cheats because a man obviously cannot cuckold a woman. But draining your resources on children you think are yours but are not is, in my opinion, one of the worst possible things that can happen to a man.
post 1576397141 03-22-2019, 10:35 AM
-
#86
  1. umadbroski
  2. Sickening kunt
  1. umadbroski
  2. Sickening kunt
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Location: Mexico
  5. Age: 32
  6. Posts: 13,110
  7. Rep Power: 48610
Originally Posted By daghetto
Lol wtf, guys are way more unloyal than girls. I’ve got friends and know lots of guys who **** around with multiple women even in relationships.
thats because men are polygamus, hence, we will bang whatever chick opens up her legs for us.

Women, on the other hand, are hypergamus, hence, they will only bang men they consider that have higher market sexual value than them.

But both men and females are equally horny af.
vegan bodybuilder crew
software engineers crew
mexican manmore crew
L.A. Rams crew
post 1576397431 03-22-2019, 10:39 AM
-
#87
  1. jwalker42
  2. Registered User
  1. jwalker42
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2009
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 1,202
  6. Rep Power: 547
Originally Posted By HomerJThompson
Not this again, of course they are less horny. Just because they are horny in relationships doesnt mean they are equally as horny as guys. If they were as horny as guys, women would have 100s of partners in their lifetime.
Strong cope. Women have dozens of partners before getting out of high school these days. Your average girl is never going to admit to you how many times she has had a 3 way. If you haven't experienced girls hitting you up just to get some I feel bad for you son, these girls are not going without sex.
"You've gotta make that **** look appealing, not like you're attempting to mix a batch of cake batter like your life depends on it." TheClips on jerking off in front a girl

Rep back 100%

Mods are kingz <---mod negged 2x for quoting TheClips and they keep changing it to this crew.

Will rep TheClips 4 life crew.
post 1576397601 03-22-2019, 10:40 AM
-
#88
  1. jwalker42
  2. Registered User
  1. jwalker42
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2009
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 1,202
  6. Rep Power: 547
Originally Posted By 78novacaine
Causation /=/ correlation

Women don't turn down sex with rando's more than men do because they aren't as horny. They turn it down because they typically have more options and can afford to be more selective with whom they choose to f*ck. Most women, even 2's and 3's (IRL, not misc standards), typically have at least 1-2 brahs that they can call on when they want some d*ck at any given point.

Cliffs: women like to f*ck as much or more than men, they are just fkng Chad or Tyrone instead of YOU...
Pretty much this. They're constantly getting offers for sex. It's 1 text away.
"You've gotta make that **** look appealing, not like you're attempting to mix a batch of cake batter like your life depends on it." TheClips on jerking off in front a girl

Rep back 100%

Mods are kingz <---mod negged 2x for quoting TheClips and they keep changing it to this crew.

Will rep TheClips 4 life crew.
post 1576397861 03-22-2019, 10:43 AM
-
#89
  1. AltarOfPlagues
  2. yerrrrrrrr meh?
  1. AltarOfPlagues
  2. yerrrrrrrr meh?
  3. Join Date: Oct 2015
  4. Posts: 14,613
  5. Rep Power: 136737
i just demonstrate my value by dropping a magnum condom on the floor
do not read my posts and weep, i am not there i do not sleep
i am the thousand greens that rep, i am the ban bet dutifully kept
of memes and trolls in toasted breads, i am not there, i am not dead.
post 1576398611 03-22-2019, 10:53 AM
-
#90
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 56
  6. Posts: 27,840
  7. Rep Power: 194666
Originally Posted By doughnutking
I know next to nothing about redpill theory as i have a long term girlfriend and it's not something i've ever looked into or read about.

I've recently met a couple of guys who are 100% redpill. Both are successful and are not even close to being incels, in fact they are the complete opposite.

So what is the story? Is the redpill gaining traction with men in general or is it predominantly a neckbeard redditor movement?

Aware me
You better get on that redpill time if you plan to keep your gf for a long time.
U
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts