Cum is cheap, eggs are expensive.

If you're ginger, bald, or manlet, your cum is literally worthless according to sperm banks. They will turn you right around and send you home.

The sad irony is: the more these women progress in their career, the smaller their pool of potential mates becomes. They are empowering themselves into a corner.

A high value woman is never going to have trouble finding a higher value male.

What's the nice guys meme?

yes veyr accurate you're very precise

would support the kids

but pass on the pussy

actually pass on the mother entirely

dead serious

lool tell me about it

baby looks like it has a fro.. yikes

[QUOTE=Rabbitjb post_id=1582966491][img]https://i.imgur.com/6y47y0g.png[img]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/hufPW7r.png[img]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/Tldggh5.png[img][/QUOTE]Ugh. Do they make those over on reddit?


[QUOTE=stardewvalley post_id=1582966591]would support the kids

but pass on the pussy

actually pass on the mother entirely

dead serious[/QUOTE]Mom might commit suicide if you gave attention to her kids but didn't try to plow. Talk about the ultimate ego destroyer.

Dr. Robin Baker, the guy who wrote Sperm Wars, thinks that way. In his book Sex in the Future he talks how, through technology, women won't even have to find a perfect lover to give them that good seed, because they will be able to just pick the perfect specimen at the lab (down to eye color, height, etc.), either according to her own taste, or according to state-enforced parameters (most likely down the road). The role of males will basically be that of providers. He also states that poliamory will be the standard, with one woman having multiple "husbands" who fight among each other for sexual access, each of them raising kids that aren't even related to them. He also theorizes that in a couple of centuries men wanting to propagate their own natural / "defective" genetic material will be seen as barbaric at best, and criminal at worst.

The only way to avoid this future is World War 3 or Jesus coming back. Probably both.

She isn't lying to you though. You knowingly go into that as a cuck.

Would smash, would not pay for bastards.

Have to read that one. Artificial eugenics is going to be a very real dilemma within our lifetime. I think the Chinese are going to be the first to do it on a mass scale, so we'll see how it works out.

To restore gender balance, I don't think we need WW3. I think a better solution is to artificially sex select (and eliminate undesirable traits via gene therapy) for an 80/20 female to male sex ratio. We won't need men to fight wars, perform manual labor, or complete complex engineering projects in the future. It's all robots and AI. By keeping a 50/50 sex ratio, we are going to have massive civil unrest and the power disparity is only going to widen. We are meant to live in harems.

look i've known no shortage of women who were forever complaining about no good available men being out there while bringing absolutely nothing to the table themselves in terms of for example a pleasant personality, sense of humour, interests or hobbies that someone might share, athletic appearance etc... but in all fairness i imagine the dudes who hear about that group and think "obviously if there's a semi local one she's obliged to date me or quit her bitching" aren't exactly bringing a lot to the table themselves other than desperation, you get me?

In principle, yes, but "never going to have trouble" is stretching it too far. Every passing year more young women are getting more college degrees and are making more money than most men their age. It is creating a societal imbalance, and not just in the Western World (see Japan). Intelligent women don't want to date down because they want the best possible mate. And men, for the most part, don't want to date a woman who makes more money than they do.

https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26747
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeands...male-graduates
https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-co...cant-find-love

Cringe.

Yes bottom feeding dudes are going to be of low value, but that's the point. There's still demand for even the lowest level women (pigwoman) but most people wouldn't blink twice if low level men just disappeared. They are completely invisible to the opposite sex.

Yeah I know the trend isn't good for women, but I still think we're a long way from parity. A woman making $50k/year might have to settle for a 6/10 guy making $80k/year instead of an 8/10 guy pulling $120k/year.

i don't entirely disagree but i feel like... guys are made to feel like if they're either having lots of casual sex or dating someone, they've failed in life and are useless, right? So they're desperate for ANY woman to "just give them a chance". OK. So... say one actually does, then what? Likely the dude soon realises "I actually have nothing in common with and don't particularly enjoy the company of this woman" and then they're either both desperate enough to stay in an unfulfilling and dysfunctional relationship because they think it's better to be miserable than to be alone, or they go back to being alone.

I just feel like the women sort of get all this a bit better and are thinking "i'd like to meet someone i feel a connection with, not just who or what ever will take me". I reckon as a man when you're thinking this woman has nothing going for her and should be relieved that you're prepared to over look all that and settle for her because no one else would.... i mean she might not know exactly that that's what you're thinking but I reckon the way you come across to her isn't exactly going to melt her heart.

But i think we're mostly on the same page that the biggest problem is that men get conditioned towards thinking their purpose in life is to be validated / approved of by women. Women sure aren't teaching each other the same about living their lives to get our approval, right?

It's eugenics, yes. I read some chapters of the book a long time ago, I don't recall him saying anything specifically about that, but it would make sense that some women would not be allowed to procreate in such scenario. The point I'm trying to make is about access to genetic propagation: a woman will not need a physical man to generate a baby to carry her own genes, while the reverse still holds true for men. A man will always need a female body to have a baby. Unless they start breeding babies in artificial wombs or something, like they're doing with sheep. Whatever the future holds, it will surely be a very fuked up place by our standards. Right now they're fighting for the rights of trans "women" to have tubes installed in their bodies so they can get pregnant. Why do you think Julian Castro made headlines defending the rights of trans women to have abortions?

Yep. It really does come down to value - most women are inherently valuable because they are fukkable, the vast majority of men aren't, and so those guys are only as valuable as the output of their labor. They can just be thrown away when their use has expired, or just outcast and effectively discarded off the bat if they weren't useful in the first place.

Same goes with 50 year old Karens and Beckys tbh, but virtually every woman under 30 is seen as more valuable by society than probably 95% of the male population. Even a 40 yo stay at home MILF is higher on the social ladder than any 40 yo Monster-chugging tradie actually working for a living, because the former has a still-bangable poosay.

What this world really values is wealth and beauty, and in a society that currently has way more people than it needs, you can go to hell if you can't provide one of those two.

female incels are either really ugly as fuk (very low %) or sloots who can't find a guy to settle down with after riding the cock carousel

Lot of guys would like to hump and dump. How many do you think actually respect her or are willing to sacrifice himself in some way?

Don't date women who like rap. lol

So what is the future? We can't go back 50 years when men were masculine, women were feminine, and relationships were monogamous. That ship has sailed. Where do we go from here?

My cousin married a woman with 4 kids. Ughhhhh it hurts to even type. Trust me there are tons of dudes out there who will happily sign up to be step parents. Single female miscers with kids have all said they have 0 problems finding men and getting them to commit. It's only a taboo on misc it seems.

Yeah bums maybe. Why would a guy with options choose a woman like that?

I still don't buy it. None of the guys I know would do it.

Why has it sailed? At this point, I wouldn't mind some authoritarian chit. Muh one man one vote is bs.

I used to think this when I was younger (it's not fair mentality). I'm so glad to be a man though. Hair, makup, periods, body hair, raging hormones, bras, getting old, ect.... No thanks I'll take being male for 100.

Most women these days can’t cook, won’t clean, can’t manage money and spend half their waking hours on social media.... if a guy’s going to willingly date someone like that you bet your azz he’s at least going to expect a compliment every so often lol.

Guys with options wouldn't, but the overwhelming majority of men don't have options. They take the first female who shows them any sort of affection. If she happens to have a gaggle of kids, that's not a deal breaker. It doesn't make rational sense, but stroll through any walmart. Tons (literally) of the most repulsive women, all with kids and husbands in tow. See it all the time.
Because the old way depended on controlling women's sexuality by making them artificially dependent on men. You going to take them out of the workforce and put them back in the home? Not a remote possibility and obviously shouldn't be. Middle aged women who slooted and got divorced were societal outcasts. Now they are celebrated. So now we are stuck in this weird purgatory with some people still trying to do monogamy and everyone else experimenting.