Metafour is exactly right. The bell curve for men is much flatter and wider than it is for women. It’s just one example of biological divergence that is not specific to humans.

Wrong, you idiot.

The IQ distribution between the genders is NOT interchangeable. Mapped as a bell-curve, men make up the large majority of BOTH extreme ends of the IQ bell-curve, which essentially means that most of the smartest (ie: geniuses) AND dumbest people on the planet are men. Females on the other hand predominantly group together in the middle (ie: average intelligence). Since intelligence obviously factors heavily into creative genius, the sheer reality that there are considerably more male geniuses than female geniuses is going to mean a higher proportion of male creative output.

It isn't just intelligence though. Creative genius requires certain KEY psychological characteristics and behaviours, most important of all probably being obsessive behaviour. You have to be OBSESSED to become a genius level musician, painter, sculptor, inventor, writer, etc, etc. Obsessive behavior is predominantly a MALE character trait, we know this by the fact that boys greatly outnumber girls in terms of mental conditions such as autism. Another huge factor is risk-taking behaviour, which again is a predominantly male trait. Think about it logically: females are the key to the succession of the human race, which means that naturally they would have evolved programming which would keep them SAFE by minimizing risk-taking behaviour. Why do you think that virtually every absolutely ridiculous human feat was attempted by a man? Think of the Wright Brothers: do you think that a woman is going to get the idea to actually attempt to build a flying machine and jump off the cliff while strapped into it? There is no evolutionary basis for a woman to put her life on the line in that fashion. Men on the other hand are DRIVEN to conquer and explore. This innate DRIVE is what leads to curiosity, which leads to creative genius.

This is all basic human gender differences. Yes, there are female geniuses and there are females capable of creative genius. Is it ever going to be a 50/50 split? No, because that isn't how humans are wired.

Most women (not all.. but most. 99.9999%)who think they are "creative" are not. They are derivative. However they have a line of cucks telling them how great their poetry is, how good their paintings are and how good their music is. Also, any woman who wants can have a band of thirsty turds within a week. They don't have to suffer to try and innovate a damn thing.

ie. Women write songs about 3 things.
1. My ex is scum he dumped me.
2. I'm a strong woman.
3. Fairytale romance (In a while they will be writing about what scum that man is)


They have no need to be creative. If you have thirsty ****gts and other deluded women telling you how creative you are... why try to do anything interesting or innovative.

Some examples:

Rosalind Franklin: DNA double helix

Lise Meitner: Nuclear Fission

Hedy Lamarr: Radio Guidance System

Candace Pert: Neuroscience Findings

Ada Lovelace: Computer Programming

willing to bet not a single one of you guys posting about how men are more creative don't have a creative bone in your body. just lmao at trying to lump yourself in with the creations of successful men because you share the same gender.

truth: 99.9% of people aren't creative, men or women. also, before like 50 years ago women weren't allowed to do anything creative except interior decorate the house, srs.

It's due to having periods. They don't only lose blood, most of it is brain cells.

You are forgetting something, LOL. Every man has a mother. Womencreatedthose men who created the greatest things.

Now which one is more creative? Man or Woman?

Partly this. Though not due to tendency to be more individualistic rather the opportunity to individualistic and the presence of mental issues to be fair

it’s simply not a level playing field

The path to being famous for creativity is littered with abuse, self-abuse, self-destruction and a lack of care for societal mores

Also strong definition of creativity. LOL

Literature, art, music all are paths that women have not been able to follow historically. Look at the famous creatives who published under Male names or needed men to be the public face of their creativity

Partly this. Though not due to tendency to be more individualistic rather the opportunity to individualistic and the presence of mental issues to be fair

it’s simply not a level playing field

The path to being famous for creativity is littered with abuse, self-abuse, self-destruction and a lack of care for societal mores

Also strong definition of creativity. LOL

Literature, art, music all are paths that women have not been able to follow historically. Look at the famous creatives who published under Male names or needed men to be the public face of their creativity

Sorry to burst the mysoginistic bubble of the small portion of social outcast misc

It’s a dull, boring and repetitive bubble to give some a feeling of superiority that is undeserved

Used to laugh at it, now just yawn

Partly this. Though not due to tendency to be more individualistic rather the opportunity to individualistic and the presence of mental issues to be fair

it’s simply not a level playing field

Partly this. Though not due to tendency to be more individualistic rather the opportunity to individualistic and the presence of mental issues to be fair

it’s simply not a level playing field

The path to being famous for creativity is littered with abuse, self-abuse, self-destruction and a lack of care for societal mores

Also strong definition of creativity. LOL

Literature, art, music all are paths that women have not been able to follow historically. Look at the famous creatives who published under Male names or needed men to be the public face of their creativity

What is sad is it isn't something they themselves have earned.

BRB some man did this... I am also a man so I am claiming a win for my team. It is like racial pride, nationalism, or being "proud" you are tall.

Be proud of your victories not of chit you were handed at birth.

Nah fam, disregard the thousands of years of Patriarchal societies that kept women out of learning institutions and other guilds. It's all about bell curves

Women have has complete rquality now for at least a whole generation. Where is the female cuckerberg, bill gates, steve jobs, elon musk, bezos, etc?

Sorry to burst the mysoginistic bubble of the small portion of social outcast misc

It’s a dull, boring and repetitive bubble to give some a feeling of superiority that is undeserved

Used to laugh at it, now just yawn

This guy tho

This guy I like

Women have has complete rquality now for at least a whole generation. Where is the female cuckerberg, bill gates, steve jobs, elon musk, bezos, etc?

but you actually get what a bell curve is

right?

Where are the black male equivalents as well? If men are superior where are all the ethnic minority men?


lol @ hundreds of years of not allowing people to learn/practice something then calling them stupid for not being able to do it.