Been thinking about this lately...

All great inventions in history were invented by men. The greatest albums in music were created by men. The greatest movies were written by men. Like all the great pieces of art in history are the works of men.


Looking at female pop stars.. Sure many of them can sing and dance, but either the music itself is complete chit or it was written by someone else (mostly both). They merely act as poster girls and are famous because of their looks, not because they're all that talented.


What woman could create something like this?





etc

Might not be the creative side that is so much different, but that males are more likely to act on a creative idea. Saw a quote recently, forget who said it, but you have to be just as good if not better at business and marketing your idea as the idea itself. Also, and idk how much I believe this myself, esp todays day and age, but men are better at convincing others their ideas are good (Presidents, CEOs etc) and are more authoritative and can more easily get access to funds to take ideas to the next level.

Women don't need to be creative to thrive in society.

Women are pretty creative in a different way. 'Needs a woman's touch' is a real thing imo.

Generally, we aren't. All of that is done by 0.0001% of men.

That said, that tiny percentage is still higher than what you find in women, and it likely has to do with our tendency to be more individualistic.

This. Women dont reap benefits for risk taking and creativity that men do. You make a platinum album? If you’re a woman who cares unless you’re hot. If you’re a man welcome to being high status and getting anyone you want.


Additionally, women are more social animals. They care about Instagram likes and YouTube watches. Meanwhile there are countless message boards online talking about technique for disc golf, running marathons, video games, excel functions, etc. do you know who occupy those communities? 90% men


Name one community for any hobby that is dominated by women that isn’t an offshoot of something involving men (ex: women’s rights)

You are forgetting something, LOL. Every man has a mother. Womencreatedthose men who created the greatest things.

Now which one is more creative? Man or Woman?

Women are more herd animals. They find safety in the herd so they tend to do what the herd does. You see it every day.

rarely will you see one stepping away from the herd and doing their own thing, They say they do but its like getting a tattoo to be different. Well, i think we know its not really different.

Men will be mountain men, sail a boat alone around the world, climb giant mountains, you name it. Men are not herd animals and prefer to go it alone.

Because all women think about is chad, social media and slooting

eod drops another truth bomb

posting ass pics on instagram is just as creative as painting the Sistine Chapel, bigot

I mean do you think in the year 1300 some European king would have given some chick an education and then given her a blank check to tinker and create things all day long? Most of these women were confined to the house or doing home based things. The kids weren’t going to raise themselves.

Like someone said, woman don't have to, Woman have won the game.

Life's biggest instinct is self preservation, to survive and pass off your genetic material. Every creature around the world has one purpose, to ensure their genetic material lives on. Our evolution and every animals evolution is based around this undeniable fact to ensure that we live on.

Now here is the red pill, woman can always be assured of their maternity. Meaning a woman will always know that the child she is giving birth to is hers and 100% hers, not Nikki's, not Stacey but 100% hers.

As men, we can never ever be 100% assured that our child is ours, never. It's why all religions and nomadic tribes from the remotest tribe in North Sentinel Island to Buddhism, Judaism, etc.. revere virgin brides, because it lessons the risk of the child not being yours. Isn't it funny that tribes that have never had contact with anyone else practice this, never has a tribe been found where they promote female promiscuity.

It's why our penises are shaped the way they are, to scoop out other men's sperm. It's why our pre-cum is a spermicide. Everything we do is to try and ensure we can attract enough attention or increase our chances of having children to make sure we live on. It why 90 year men can still get 18 year old woman pregnant and not vice versa.

What you're talking about sounds like sexual dimorphism.
Basically it's the
Differences between the sexes. Males are more unique, colorful, and vibrant. While females are bland because they don't compete like males. I think it's a cognitive thing too, hence why males are tend to be geniuses and brilliant artists like Da Vinci, Picasso, Van Gough.

Wow that blew my mind

bigger brains and testosterone

Women have no drive because they don't need to do anything but look pretty and they can live a pretty comfortable life.

Thousands of years of exclusion from higher education/guilds/etc. None of these places allowed women to be a part of them. Even recently you find out more and more women were responsible for some pretty amazing discoveries and inventions but then their boss or someone would take the credit and exclude them from the publishing credits.

Its simple. different dna= different attributes and abilities.

same goes for race, which many don't like talking about.

Most of you are looking too far into this. It’s simple, it’s all about competition. Men are driven to be better than the guy next to them and that includes being more creative too.

Some examples:

Rosalind Franklin: DNA double helix

One of the most important scientific revelations of the twentieth century has also long been a subject of disputed credit. Famously, Cambridge University scientists James D. Watson and Francis H.C. Crick are credited with uncovering the double helix formation that would catapult forward our understanding of human DNA. In fact though, British chemist and X-ray crystallographer Rosalind Franklin had been engaged in the study of DNA over at Kings’s College in London in 1951 when she produced a groundbreaking image. A colleague showed this image to Watson and Crick without permission. This was the turning point in their research, though when they published their earth-shattering findings in 1953, they gave only passing reference to Franklin’s contributions. In perpetuity, it is the Cambridge pair that is associated with the double helix. So says the Nobel Prize they received in 1958, four years after Franklin died of ovarian cancer.

Lise Meitner: Nuclear Fission

As long as we’re on the subject of scientific genius, there’s the story of Lise Meitner. It’s hard to say whether Meitner is better or worse off for having been slighted by a greedy man. Meitner was a student under the legendary physicist Max Plank, and the first German woman to hold a professorship at a German University. As the Nazis rose to power, the young Jewish scientist was forced to flee her home country. She continued to correspond with her research partner, Otto Hahn, from her new location in Scandinavia. In 1938, Hahn and Meitner joined forces to outline the concept of nuclear fission. This was the groundbreaking moment that would, in just five years, give rise to the awesome destructive capacity of the atomic bomb. Anybody looking to send angry letters to those responsible would find only Hahn’s name on the landmark paper revealing the discovery. Hahn chose to omit his partner’s name and was thus the sole recipient of the 1944 prize in chemistry from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

Hedy Lamarr: Radio Guidance System

Meitner wasn’t the only woman working to build military might during World War II. She is joined by Austrian-born, American actress Hedy Lamarr, who in addition to becoming a star of the Silver Screen during the Golden Age of Hollywood, collaborated with composer George Antheil to create a radio guidance system for Allied tor****es. The Navy pretended it wasn’t interested in the technology, but of course it was. They stole Lamarr and Antheil’s idea, classified the patent and, by the 1960s, had begun to incorporate the technology into a host of new weapons systems. Perhaps even more importantly, Lamarr and Antheil’s work would be nothing less than the basis for the omnipresent Wi-Fi, CDMA, and Bluetooth wireless technologies.

Candace Pert: Neuroscience Findings

While still a graduate student at Johns Hopkins University, Candace Pert discovered the receptor that allows opiates to lock into the brain. This game-changing neuroscience revelation was so important that it led to an award—for her professor. Dr. Solomon Snyder was recognized for his student’s achievement. When Pert wrote a letter of protest to the award committee underscoring her determinant contributions, Dr. Snyder in response, “That’s how the game is played.”

Ada Lovelace: Computer Programming

Lord Byron’s daughter, Ada Lovelace, was one of the world’s first computer geniuses, though her role is often minimized by male historians. In 1843, the mathematically erudite Lovelace collaborated with inventor Charles Babbage at the University of London. Babbage was working on something called an Analytical Engine, an early prototype of the computer. Lovelace contributed detailed and extensive notes to Babbage’s work, particularly by articulating the way Babbage’s machine could be fed data to complete complicated math problems, or even compose complex music. These ideas may mark the earliest recorded proposition for what would eventually become computer programming and algorithms. Today, Lovelace’s contributions are obscured by debate, and most often by the dismissive and unmistakably misogynistic characterizations of her role.

less influenced by the opinion of others (for the most part)

probably the biggest factor imo

Risk taking behavior is enhanced with testosterone levels.

Men have more hyper intelligent and retarded individuals in their population. The means end up equaling, but it is the best of the best that end up doing special chit.

Visual Spatial Intelligence is higher in males.


The aspects women excel at and have been biologically selected for are typically more social.

Not sure, but it is irrefutably true.
Was watching some movie with my wife a couple of nights back. I knew from the beginning it would suck because the director was female.

PS. Varg is a cuck.

Most hilarious post of 2019.
Gold.

God created Man from His image. Woman was created from Man's image. Man has access to the divine spark, which enables him to have deep, pondering thoughts stemming inward from their own souls. Since the dawn of time, men have wondered life's greatest existential questions, thus why philosophers tend to be men. Women were created to support man. Case in point: Speak to a woman about existential questions such as the nature of consciousness, our place in the order of the cosmos, belief systems, religion, solipsism and that is a surefire way to scare her off. But make some BS up, pack it together, and call it astrology and there you have it, a woman will consume it. Men are positive energy aka givers, creators while women are negative energy (consumers, feeding off positive energy). This is what separates man from woman. We are capable of deep thought as well as the capacity for courage. Women like being a damsel in distress, which is why they like to play victim and act offended and hurt by everything. Yin and yang.

lol

Most women (not all.. but most. 99.9999%)who think they are "creative" are not. They are derivative. However they have a line of cucks telling them how great their poetry is, how good their paintings are and how good their music is. Also, any woman who wants can have a band of thirsty turds within a week. They don't have to suffer to try and innovate a damn thing.

ie. Women write songs about 3 things.
1. My ex is scum he dumped me.
2. I'm a strong woman.
3. Fairytale romance (In a while they will be writing about what scum that man is)


They have no need to be creative. If you have thirsty ****gts and other deluded women telling you how creative you are... why try to do anything interesting or innovative.

Wrong, you idiot.

The IQ distribution between the genders is NOT interchangeable. Mapped as a bell-curve, men make up the large majority of BOTH extreme ends of the IQ bell-curve, which essentially means that most of the smartest (ie: geniuses) AND dumbest people on the planet are men. Females on the other hand predominantly group together in the middle (ie: average intelligence). Since intelligence obviously factors heavily into creative genius, the sheer reality that there are considerably more male geniuses than female geniuses is going to mean a higher proportion of male creative output.

It isn't just intelligence though. Creative genius requires certain KEY psychological characteristics and behaviours, most important of all probably being obsessive behaviour. You have to be OBSESSED to become a genius level musician, painter, sculptor, inventor, writer, etc, etc. Obsessive behavior is predominantly a MALE character trait, we know this by the fact that boys greatly outnumber girls in terms of mental conditions such as autism. Another huge factor is risk-taking behaviour, which again is a predominantly male trait. Think about it logically: females are the key to the succession of the human race, which means that naturally they would have evolved programming which would keep them SAFE by minimizing risk-taking behaviour. Why do you think that virtually every absolutely ridiculous human feat was attempted by a man? Think of the Wright Brothers: do you think that a woman is going to get the idea to actually attempt to build a flying machine and jump off the cliff while strapped into it? There is no evolutionary basis for a woman to put her life on the line in that fashion. Men on the other hand are DRIVEN to conquer and explore. This innate DRIVE is what leads to curiosity, which leads to creative genius.

This is all basic human gender differences. Yes, there are female geniuses and there are females capable of creative genius. Is it ever going to be a 50/50 split? No, because that isn't how humans are wired.