Forum
ยป
AZ teacher who slept with student gets 20 years!!!
07-13-2019, 12:29 PM
-
#151
- IronILLinois
- King Rustle
-
- IronILLinois
- King Rustle
- Join Date: Jul 2013
- Location: United States
- Posts: 14,192
- Rep Power: 171399
-
-
i remember this story out of all of the teacher sex stories the most for some reason. 20 years got damn!!!
Toxic Male Energy
Pull-up mogged GooBaa 19JAN2023, me (10) him (5). To this day he refuses to take his perm.
Garbage Tier Miscer List: LargePeter (5 foot 9), GooBaa, Luc1fer, MinisterofLust, Fang2, OPGenesis, NYPat, DolphinPilot, (saved).
07-13-2019, 12:33 PM
-
#152
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
-
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
- Join Date: Jul 2007
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 24,590
- Rep Power: 86323
-
-
Originally Posted By Legz422⏩
Thats the thing here - its the action that needs to be punished, not the consequences.I understand your examples, but you can not compare them to this case. A 13 year old child is a 13 year old child no matter their sex. You can't justify it away.
Going back to the example of the public asskicking to a male and female and the subsequent different levels of humiliation that follows - if both were sucker punched and curbstomped, is the one that did it to the female less guilty than the one that did it to a male?
I understand it doesn't affect the young male as much as it does the young female - it still doesn't change the fact that a 30 year old predator used her influence, maturity and experience to exploit a minor. And that is what the crime is.
07-13-2019, 12:33 PM
-
#153
- Bcl2
- Registered User
-
- Bcl2
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2015
- Location: Amarillo, Texas, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 1,625
- Rep Power: 36676
-
-
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
13 year olds are children. Nice to see the not so closeted misc ped0 apologists out in full force today.A 13 year old isn't really a child. I mean, with the way society is heading, maybe they are....
07-13-2019, 12:37 PM
-
#154
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
-
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
- Join Date: Jul 2007
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 24,590
- Rep Power: 86323
-
-
Originally Posted By FailedPotential⏩
If you and I were to rob different convenience stores by gunpoint and you got away with $300 and I got away with $20, should I serve a lesser sentence because my victim didn't suffer as much?Another -
Jane is 22, she bangs her neighbours dad.
James is 22, he bangs his neighbours mom.
People will now call Jane a slut.
People will now call James a stud.
But the outcomes are equal? I don't even.
Jane is 22, she bangs her neighbours dad.
James is 22, he bangs his neighbours mom.
People will now call Jane a slut.
People will now call James a stud.
But the outcomes are equal? I don't even.
If I beat up a homeless man who has no pride left to destroy while you beat up the homecoming king who was absolutely devastated by the defeat, should I go free while you are punished because your victim suffered more than I did?
07-13-2019, 12:37 PM
-
#155
Originally Posted By Frank
Exactly.Thats the thing here - its the action that needs to be punished, not the consequences.
Going back to the example of the public asskicking to a male and female and the subsequent different levels of humiliation that follows - if both were sucker punched and curbstomped, is the one that did it to the female less guilty than the one that did it to a male?
I understand it doesn't affect the young male as much as it does the young female - it still doesn't change the fact that a 30 year old predator used her influence, maturity and experience to exploit a minor. And that is what the crime is.
Going back to the example of the public asskicking to a male and female and the subsequent different levels of humiliation that follows - if both were sucker punched and curbstomped, is the one that did it to the female less guilty than the one that did it to a male?
I understand it doesn't affect the young male as much as it does the young female - it still doesn't change the fact that a 30 year old predator used her influence, maturity and experience to exploit a minor. And that is what the crime is.
Originally Posted By Bcl2⏩
Exactly this too. I want everyone here who's said a 13 year old is not a child to go into a classroom full of them. Go ahead. Go talk to them. Then tell me they're on the same level emotionally, maturity wise and looks wise as a 29 year old adult.13 year olds are children. Nice to see the not so closeted misc ped0 apologists out in full force today.
~ In a world where you can be anything, be kind ~
07-13-2019, 12:46 PM
-
#156
07-13-2019, 12:55 PM
-
#157
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
-
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 14,376
- Rep Power: 59586
-
-
Originally Posted By Legz422⏩
I'm not comparing them to this case. They're just simplified,non OP related examples, to show how you can't input different variables and expect the same outcome.I understand your examples, but you can not compare them to this case. A 13 year old child is a 13 year old child no matter their sex. You can't justify it away.
I'm not justifying anyone's actions, don't imply that I am. My posts can be simplified even further to say that 1 doesn't equal 2. That's the very root of what I'm saying.
Only rebuttal exactly what I type and no presumptions or implications that I'm implying anything other than exactly what I type -
A 13 year old boy child, is NOT a 13 year old girl child. The effects of an adult male teacher abusing a 13 year old girl child will be more harmful, on average, than an adult female teacher abusing a 13 year old male child. Both adults are paedophiles and deserve severe punishment.
Fak U say? Cheeky kent ya, i'll fakin fak ya, ya lil sloot
07-13-2019, 12:55 PM
-
#158
- Destor
- Registered User
-
- Destor
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2012
- Location: Alberta, Canada
- Age: 41
- Posts: 43,481
- Rep Power: 254906
-
-
Originally Posted By jafomofo⏩
In Canada a 14 year old can legally consent with a 19 year old, and a 15 year old can consent with a 20 year old, these are close-in-age exceptions to the Age of Consent laws. 13 and 19 could be a matter of months off, probably wouldn't even go to court here (depending on the parents) but it's not even close to the same as the situation in the OPI was bangin' a 19 year old college girl when I was 13. I wasn't traumatized. Weird.
Originally Posted By FailedPotential⏩
Teenage girls are FAR more mature -- generally both physically and mentally -- than boys of the same age in that phase of life. What exactly is the reasoning behind a boy being less prone to damage than a girl in this situation?I'm not comparing them to this case. They're just simplified,non OP related examples, to show how you can't input different variables and expect the same outcome.
I'm not justifying anyone's actions, don't imply that I am. My posts can be simplified even further to say that 1 doesn't equal 2. That's the very root of what I'm saying.
Only rebuttal exactly what I type and no presumptions or implications that I'm implying anything other than exactly what I type -
A 13 year old boy child, is NOT a 13 year old girl child. The effects of an adult male teacher abusing a 13 year old girl child will be more harmful, on average, than an adult female teacher abusing a 13 year old male child. Both adults are paedophiles and deserve severe punishment.
I'm not justifying anyone's actions, don't imply that I am. My posts can be simplified even further to say that 1 doesn't equal 2. That's the very root of what I'm saying.
Only rebuttal exactly what I type and no presumptions or implications that I'm implying anything other than exactly what I type -
A 13 year old boy child, is NOT a 13 year old girl child. The effects of an adult male teacher abusing a 13 year old girl child will be more harmful, on average, than an adult female teacher abusing a 13 year old male child. Both adults are paedophiles and deserve severe punishment.
07-13-2019, 12:55 PM
-
#159
- Contribution05
- Registered User
-
- Contribution05
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: Illinois, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 6,239
- Rep Power: 31631
-
-
Originally Posted By Legz422⏩
I don't think anyone is claiming 13 year olds are the same maturity wise as 29 year olds. but 13 is a teenager and has most likely gone through puberty and is attracted to girls and women alike. That's not quite the same as a "small boy" which i think in most peoples heads draws the image of a 5-8 year old. "child" outside of US laws usually refers to someone who has yet to hit puberty. So real ****philes are adults attracted to children who have yet to hit puberty.Exactly.
Exactly this too. I want everyone here who's said a 13 year old is not a child to go into a classroom full of them. Go ahead. Go talk to them. Then tell me they're on the same level emotionally, maturity wise and looks wise as a 29 year old adult.
Exactly this too. I want everyone here who's said a 13 year old is not a child to go into a classroom full of them. Go ahead. Go talk to them. Then tell me they're on the same level emotionally, maturity wise and looks wise as a 29 year old adult.
I'm fine with her being punished, but I just don't think a horny teenage boy having sex with his hot teacher is gonna be all that devastated in life.
07-13-2019, 01:06 PM
-
#160
- potbellymadar
- Registered User
-
- potbellymadar
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: United States
- Posts: 12,217
- Rep Power: 74024
-
-
Originally Posted By cannonballdooky⏩
You look like youโd phuck a hole in the wall so itโs not saying muchWould become pen pal with and fuk the chit out of her on a visit if I had the chance/10
Dachshund Crew 4 life
Austrian
Poverty Chair
Impeach RichStrong
07-13-2019, 01:07 PM
-
#161
- NillaWafer
- Registered User
-
- NillaWafer
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2010
- Age: 35
- Posts: 11,594
- Rep Power: 50232
-
-
Originally Posted By Contribution05⏩
Agreed with this. There's even an insanely popular song from the 2000s that is all about horny teens, who look insanely young in the video (great vid btw), wanting to smash a MILF. I present Stacy's Mom into evidence.I don't think anyone is claiming 13 year olds are the same maturity wise as 29 year olds. but 13 is a teenager and has most likely gone through puberty and is attracted to girls and women alike. That's not quite the same as a "small boy" which i think in most peoples heads draws the image of a 5-8 year old. "child" outside of US laws usually refers to someone who has yet to hit puberty. So real ****philes are adults attracted to children who have yet to hit puberty.
I'm fine with her being punished, but I just don't think a horny teenage boy having sex with his hot teacher is gonna be all that devastated in life.
I'm fine with her being punished, but I just don't think a horny teenage boy having sex with his hot teacher is gonna be all that devastated in life.
There's also the 'nice' southpark reference that gets posted all the time in these threads. There's just something different when it's a 13 year old boy and a 13 year old girl. Is it still wrong? Yes. Should it be punishable? Also yes. This teacher should absolutely be punished because we can't be having teachers abusing their power. But 20 years seems off to me. Punishment doesn't fit the crime imo.
FL IS THE GOAT STATE CREW
07-13-2019, 01:10 PM
-
#162
- 2RDEYE
- Unregistered User
-
- 2RDEYE
- Unregistered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 36,111
- Rep Power: 92424
-
-
i would ****in love to **** that sexy ass woman as a teen. sorry i mean horrible woman
that naughty, dirty, sexy woman how dare she open her legs for me and let me cum all over her face. criminal
i wish my grade 9 math teacher let me have sex with her srs still fantasize about that **** even to this day lol those days of wet dreams
that naughty, dirty, sexy woman how dare she open her legs for me and let me cum all over her face. criminal
i wish my grade 9 math teacher let me have sex with her srs still fantasize about that **** even to this day lol those days of wet dreams
There is only one Hell: the one we live in now.
07-13-2019, 01:15 PM
-
#163
07-13-2019, 01:15 PM
-
#164
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
-
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 14,376
- Rep Power: 59586
-
-
Originally Posted By Destor⏩
It's relative to how each will be treated in society.What exactly is the reasoning behind a boy being less prone to damage than a girl in this situation?
The boy will often be treated by his buddies like he's a victor. His reputation in his network will skyrocket. Sounds backwards to say. I'm not saying female teachers should abuse student boys. Just stating reality. Sometimes the boy will be negatively effected. The boy was a victim.
The girl will be treated like she was a victim, and she was a victim.
The girl will lose all of her self esteem.
Both adults are pdo's, regardless of outcome, and deserve severe punishment. However, both cases are not equal. That's my point here, that both cases are not equal. Whether they should be punished equally is a different conversation.
Fak U say? Cheeky kent ya, i'll fakin fak ya, ya lil sloot
07-13-2019, 01:23 PM
-
#165
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
-
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 14,376
- Rep Power: 59586
-
-
Originally Posted By Frank
See you're arguing what the punishment should be, I'm not even arguing that.If you and I were to rob different convenience stores by gunpoint and you got away with $300 and I got away with $20, should I serve a lesser sentence because my victim didn't suffer as much?
If I beat up a homeless man who has no pride left to destroy while you beat up the homecoming king who was absolutely devastated by the defeat, should I go free while you are punished because your victim suffered more than I did?
If I beat up a homeless man who has no pride left to destroy while you beat up the homecoming king who was absolutely devastated by the defeat, should I go free while you are punished because your victim suffered more than I did?
I'm arguing that one situations is worse than another, even if both situations are bad.
To use your example, the convenience store guy getting robbed $300 by me, and $20 by you. He was worse effected by me. Agree?
What should the punishment be? That's a different conversation, one I'm not even arguing. I'm just arguing that one thing is worse than another thing, that's all.
Fak U say? Cheeky kent ya, i'll fakin fak ya, ya lil sloot
07-13-2019, 01:25 PM
-
#166
- 2RDEYE
- Unregistered User
-
- 2RDEYE
- Unregistered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 36,111
- Rep Power: 92424
-
-
i think the punishment should be how the victim feels. but then again he's a child.
if i was the kid i would say that i really don't feel that she did anything bad to me. but that's me lmao i was horny as **** at that kid's age
if i was the kid i would say that i really don't feel that she did anything bad to me. but that's me lmao i was horny as **** at that kid's age
There is only one Hell: the one we live in now.
07-13-2019, 01:28 PM
-
#167
07-13-2019, 01:28 PM
-
#168
Originally Posted By FailedPotential⏩
But why do you continue to argue that? The point is the punishment should be the same whether it's a male child or a female child. Someone shouldn't get leniency because they molested a boy vs a girl. They are both equal crimes.See you're arguing what the punishment should be, I'm not even arguing that.
I'm arguing that one situations is worse than another, even if both situations are bad.
To use your example, the convenience store guy getting robbed $300 by me, and $20 by you. He was worse effected by me. Agree?
What should the punishment be? That's a different conversation, one I'm not even arguing. I'm just arguing that one thing is worse than another thing, that's all.
I'm arguing that one situations is worse than another, even if both situations are bad.
To use your example, the convenience store guy getting robbed $300 by me, and $20 by you. He was worse effected by me. Agree?
What should the punishment be? That's a different conversation, one I'm not even arguing. I'm just arguing that one thing is worse than another thing, that's all.
~ In a world where you can be anything, be kind ~
07-13-2019, 01:31 PM
-
#169
- DolphinPilot
- Join Date: May 2015
- Posts: 49,469
- Rep Power: 367822
-
-
Originally Posted By redraider86⏩
The misc is getting better from what I've been seeing. Only a small few of us used to argue female teachers should get equal treatment to male counterparts and she is in fact a predator. There seems to be fewer and fewer "lol wish I could bang my teacher before I had pubes that would be fkin hot srs bro pussy rocks" posts each time we have this discussionTotally fine with arguing what a reasonable punishment is or isn't. Once you're arguing that children won't suffer negatively from sexual assault by a person twice their age....Well, I can't think of an innocent, misunderstood reason for such an argument. Yes, children fool around and experiment. With one another. Not with people in authority positions who are twice the age of the child. Really twisted stuff and it's astounding that we're still having this conversation.
07-13-2019, 01:39 PM
-
#170
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By Legz422⏩
Dude, you guys are the ones saying that this "child" is going to be traumatized. Which is hilarious.I'm not at all surprised at some of these guys saying those exact same thing, but a cop? Yeah. Totally surprised by that.
07-13-2019, 01:41 PM
-
#171
- MiamiLife305
- Registered User
-
- MiamiLife305
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 36
- Posts: 18,052
- Rep Power: 41951
-
-
20 years?
Jesus thats a bit much
Jesus thats a bit much
Future P.A in progress
We're all gonna make it
sleep tight pupper
07-13-2019, 01:43 PM
-
#172
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By Bcl2⏩
A 13 year old is usually in 8th grade unless they were held back. You make it sound like they still believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.13 year olds are children. Nice to see the not so closeted misc ped0 apologists out in full force today.
07-13-2019, 01:47 PM
-
#173
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By Legz422⏩
You make it sound like he was playing in the kiddie pool.That's not the same thing as a 29 year old that is in a position of authority over a 13 year old. She was still wrong and ugh that's groce AF! She was an adult sexually attracted to a child. That's not normal.
07-13-2019, 01:48 PM
-
#174
Originally Posted By Legz422⏩
just wondering this:I understand your examples, but you can not compare them to this case. A 13 year old child is a 13 year old child no matter their sex. You can't justify it away.
When do teenage years start and when are you technically no longer a 'child'?
I was drinking beer and partying at 13 years old. I would have banged that teacher so hard (and last 20 seconds) and shared all the details with my guy friends. I would have instantly reached alpha male status.
I agree with the 20 year sentence for the action and intent, but the consequences for a male teen with female teacher and female teen with male teacher are completely different.
07-13-2019, 01:48 PM
-
#175
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By jafomofo⏩
If true, good for you. ๐I was bangin' a 19 year old college girl when I was 13. I wasn't traumatized. Weird.
07-13-2019, 01:49 PM
-
#176
- Bcl2
- Registered User
-
- Bcl2
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2015
- Location: Amarillo, Texas, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 1,625
- Rep Power: 36676
-
-
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
A 13 year old is a child. Your rationalizations don't make that statement any less true. Those rationalizations would be weird as a one off, but they're outright shocking considering the thread context.A 13 year old is usually in 8th grade unless they were held back. You make it sound like they still believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.
Originally Posted By Legz422⏩
The thing is, these guys won't and don't see it this way, because they believe 13 year olds can consent. That's the simplest explanation. Then they continue to mock the idea that sexual trauma is real and experienced by boys and men. Sad.Exactly this too. I want everyone here who's said a 13 year old is not a child to go into a classroom full of them. Go ahead. Go talk to them. Then tell me they're on the same level emotionally, maturity wise and looks wise as a 29 year old adult.
07-13-2019, 01:49 PM
-
#177
- 8PointBuck
- Registered User
-
- 8PointBuck
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2016
- Posts: 7,544
- Rep Power: 63247
-
-
fukking retarded. men and women are different. the kid had the time of his life and suffered no mental consequences over this.
lol @ misc incels saying this is a just sentence.
lol @ misc incels saying this is a just sentence.
07-13-2019, 01:49 PM
-
#178
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By tecom⏩
You don't get it, he's a child, he's scared for life....just wondering this:
When do teenage years start and when are you technically no longer a 'child'?
When do teenage years start and when are you technically no longer a 'child'?
07-13-2019, 01:53 PM
-
#179
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By Bcl2⏩
Is a 14 year old a child?A 13 year old is a child. Your rationalizations don't make that statement any less true. Those rationalizations would be weird as a one off, but they're outright shocking considering the thread context.
The thing is, these guys won't and don't see it this way, because they believe 13 year olds can consent. That's the simplest explanation.
The thing is, these guys won't and don't see it this way, because they believe 13 year olds can consent. That's the simplest explanation.
07-13-2019, 01:54 PM
-
#180
- DolphinPilot
- Join Date: May 2015
- Posts: 49,469
- Rep Power: 367822
-
-
Originally Posted By tecom⏩
I dunno, probably 18. Although a lot of people aren't mature at all by that time anyways.just wondering this:
When do teenage years start and when are you technically no longer a 'child'?
When do teenage years start and when are you technically no longer a 'child'?
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts