Forum
»
Why are only 3.8% of geniuses female?
10-02-2019, 10:37 PM
-
#91
10-02-2019, 10:38 PM
-
#92
10-02-2019, 10:41 PM
-
#93
10-02-2019, 10:46 PM
-
#94
- Rebel012
- Registered User
-
- Rebel012
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2018
- Location: Canada
- Age: 43
- Posts: 7,027
- Rep Power: 57751
-
-
Originally Posted By Mr
Lol, thought about commenting on that as well. I'm sure the irony is lost on him.men will always be more intellect
men will always be more intellect
men will always be more intellect
men will always be more intellect
men will always be more intellect
men will always be more intellect
men will always be more intellect
men will always be more intellect
men will always be more intellect
10-02-2019, 10:56 PM
-
#95
- SUPERH0T
- Registered User
-
- SUPERH0T
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 4,663
- Rep Power: 18810
-
-
Originally Posted By Jacobcapra⏩
Made us more successful evolutionarily.Yeah but, why?
Also women are dumb as fuk
SUPERHOT SUPERHOT SUPERHOT SUPERHOT
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.
SUPERHOT SUPERHOT SUPERHOT SUPERHOT
10-02-2019, 10:58 PM
-
#96
10-02-2019, 11:02 PM
-
#97
10-02-2019, 11:04 PM
-
#98
- SUPERH0T
- Registered User
-
- SUPERH0T
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 4,663
- Rep Power: 18810
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
This is the exact same cope as "You cant move fast with all those muscles. Women prefer dadbod anyway"most high IQ people have very low EQ.
Pathetic.
SUPERHOT SUPERHOT SUPERHOT SUPERHOT
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.
SUPERHOT SUPERHOT SUPERHOT SUPERHOT
10-02-2019, 11:04 PM
-
#99
10-02-2019, 11:10 PM
-
#100
10-02-2019, 11:14 PM
-
#101
10-02-2019, 11:26 PM
-
#102
10-02-2019, 11:43 PM
-
#103
10-03-2019, 12:51 AM
-
#104
10-03-2019, 12:59 AM
-
#105
- LexBrah
- Registered User
-
- LexBrah
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 34
- Posts: 5,304
- Rep Power: 58960
-
-
Originally Posted By CementPizza⏩
FixedNo. I know that there is a category on that scale that says "genius" but in no way shape or form means the person is a genius.
Geniuses are folks like
Mozart
Van Gogh
Sir Issac newton
Aristotle
Bach
Paul McCartney
Jimi Hendrix
Michael Angelo
Davinci
Shakespear
Einstien
The Wright Brothers
Marconi
Nicola Tesla
Henry Darger
Mark Twain
Ben Franklin
Andy Warhol
Lexbrah
Some are science types some are not.
Often the people with the highest "IQ" contribute the least.
Not always but often.
Geniuses are folks like
Mozart
Van Gogh
Sir Issac newton
Aristotle
Bach
Paul McCartney
Jimi Hendrix
Michael Angelo
Davinci
Shakespear
Einstien
The Wright Brothers
Marconi
Nicola Tesla
Henry Darger
Mark Twain
Ben Franklin
Andy Warhol
Lexbrah
Some are science types some are not.
Often the people with the highest "IQ" contribute the least.
Not always but often.
10-03-2019, 07:27 AM
-
#106
- CementPizza
- Registered User
-
- CementPizza
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2002
- Posts: 49,096
- Rep Power: 271368
-
-
Originally Posted By DeadlyStriker⏩
No it's not. They incorrectly use the term "genius" for those who score well on a particular test.That's not an answer.
IQ is intelligent quotient based on standardized testing to best numerate a person's intelligence.
A genius is someone that is exceptional in terms of intelligence or creativity. Anyone with an exceptional IQ is a genius.
That's an objective fact.
IQ is intelligent quotient based on standardized testing to best numerate a person's intelligence.
A genius is someone that is exceptional in terms of intelligence or creativity. Anyone with an exceptional IQ is a genius.
That's an objective fact.
They may be very good at taking tests but the are not a genius.
Someone who scores well on that test MIGHT have a high IQ or be exceptionally creative but that does not mean they are a genius.
There are a bunch of turds wandering around MENSA meetings who have scored very well but are definitely not geniuses. They are just people who scored well on some particular test.
And by "people" I mean a bunch of self important neck beard types. They really aren't people they are just a mouth breathing bio-mass that somewhat resembles a human.
R.I.P. Hector Bluntz
I am sex yor butt.
Sick Duck Crew.
Stroke crew
Mortal Enema Crew.
Intent to penetrate Crew.
https://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Kitchen-Dining-Potholders/zgbs/kitchen/678537011
10-03-2019, 08:52 AM
-
#107
- MissMillieXS
- Registered User
-
- MissMillieXS
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 190
- Rep Power: 1653
-
-
Originally Posted By Iceman1800⏩
Exactly, it would be a bad use of precious sandwich making time..Probably more women are. They just don't administer IQ tests in the kitchen.
I heart Iceman1800
10-03-2019, 09:02 AM
-
#108
- CementPizza
- Registered User
-
- CementPizza
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2002
- Posts: 49,096
- Rep Power: 271368
-
-
Originally Posted By MissMillieXS⏩
So is posting on the misc, woman. I see posting but I don't see sandwich making.Exactly, it would be a bad use of precious sandwich making time..
R.I.P. Hector Bluntz
I am sex yor butt.
Sick Duck Crew.
Stroke crew
Mortal Enema Crew.
Intent to penetrate Crew.
https://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Kitchen-Dining-Potholders/zgbs/kitchen/678537011
10-03-2019, 09:07 AM
-
#109
- farmergainsbrah
- Registered User
-
- farmergainsbrah
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 2,656
- Rep Power: 30089
-
-
Originally Posted By MissMillieXS⏩
How much attention do you need / how bad is your face if your avi is your butt?Exactly, it would be a bad use of precious sandwich making time..
10-03-2019, 09:15 AM
-
#110
- nothingshocking
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Location: Uranus, Gambia
- Posts: 36,399
- Subscribers: 5
- Rep Power: 952290
-
-
Originally Posted By CementPizza⏩
The mensa bar is pretty low - iq in the top 2% or approximately 2 standard deviations from the meanNo it's not. They incorrectly use the term "genius" for those who score well on a particular test.
They may be very good at taking tests but the are not a genius.
Someone who scores well on that test MIGHT have a high IQ or be exceptionally creative but that does not mean they are a genius.
There are a bunch of turds wandering around MENSA meetings who have scored very well but are definitely not geniuses. They are just people who scored well on some particular test.
And by "people" I mean a bunch of self important neck beard types. They really aren't people they are just a mouth breathing bio-mass that somewhat resembles a human.
They may be very good at taking tests but the are not a genius.
Someone who scores well on that test MIGHT have a high IQ or be exceptionally creative but that does not mean they are a genius.
There are a bunch of turds wandering around MENSA meetings who have scored very well but are definitely not geniuses. They are just people who scored well on some particular test.
And by "people" I mean a bunch of self important neck beard types. They really aren't people they are just a mouth breathing bio-mass that somewhat resembles a human.
This means that 140 million people in the world could qualify for Mensa.
These are smart people who could likely achieve anything they put their minds to career wise, get into any school if they work hard, but they are certainly not all geniuses.
The mensa bar being too low does not mean that IQ is not a relevant measure of genius, it's probably anyone who is outside the 3rd standard deviation, or an iq over 145 that are capable of being geniuses.
10-03-2019, 09:16 AM
-
#111
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By armies⏩
Lol at the red IQcels blabbering in this thread. I know you are ripping things from online "IQ FACTS" sites, but sorry, there isn't evidence these people took IQ tests at all, and certainly no evidence of reported scores. Your Tesla IQ of 202 is meaningless babble.The mind of a true genius (Nikola Tesla's IQ was 202)


Even if it did had an ounce of truth in it, which it does not, exactly how much meaning would the statement "Tesla was more intelligent than Einstein" have? I mean you are falsely saying it's 202 to 160 in this case, but why should one say Tesla was in some sense, "smarter"? You see very quickly just how void of meaning any of this is.
Leonardo da Vinci had an.....IQ......of 220? Lol wtf does this even mean?
But you're a red IQcel, so it's pointless. To repeat: I'm convinced the only purpose the upper end of the IQ spectrum serves is to provide a means for someone who hasn't actually contributed anything of note, to say they are "smart". The misc is full of IQcels who praise IQ. They also seem to think that being introverted makes you some super-duper-mega-IQ genius by itself (lol). The actual intelligent people out there- your Einsteins, Stephen Hawking's, etc, are usually first to denounce the whole "smartness/IQ" nonsense.
Hawking: "People who boast about their IQs are losers".
Einstein was known to downplay intelligence. Although I consider him obviously very smart under the definition I tend to use, he seemed to think his success was partly explainable just by his perseverance to stay with problems, and his child-like curiosity about the world that continued into adult years, unlike most (i.e. he was still curious what time and space meant in his 20s,30s,40s.....questions that children are known to ask about. Whereas most human adults seem to just get caught in their ways and cant be bothered by such child-like questions). Einstein's brain, btw was measured to have a mass of 1230g, nothing remarkable from the average adult human male, perhaps slightly less mass even.
As a side note, I have observed on the misc that whenever logic/puzzle/math type questions come up, that have objective answers that are not easily googled online, the IQcels seem to be suspiciously absent, and not answering the problems. Hmmmm, makes you think.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
10-03-2019, 10:19 AM
-
#112
- PenorBrahNoHomo
- R1b
-
- PenorBrahNoHomo
- R1b
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 28,218
- Rep Power: 130149
-
-
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
Low IQ detected!Lol at the red IQcels blabbering in this thread. I know you are ripping things from online "IQ FACTS" sites, but sorry, there isn't evidence these people took IQ tests at all, and certainly no evidence of reported scores. Your Tesla IQ of 202 is meaningless babble.
Even if it did had an ounce of truth in it, which it does not, exactly how much meaning would the statement "Tesla was more intelligent than Einstein" have? I mean you are falsely saying it's 202 to 160 in this case, but why should one say Tesla was in some sense, "smarter"? You see very quickly just how void of meaning any of this is.
Leonardo da Vinci had an.....IQ......of 220? Lol wtf does this even mean?
But you're a red IQcel, so it's pointless. To repeat: I'm convinced the only purpose the upper end of the IQ spectrum serves is to provide a means for someone who hasn't actually contributed anything of note, to say they are "smart". The misc is full of IQcels who praise IQ. They also seem to think that being introverted makes you some super-duper-mega-IQ genius by itself (lol). The actual intelligent people out there- your Einsteins, Stephen Hawking's, etc, are usually first to denounce the whole "smartness/IQ" nonsense.
Hawking: "People who boast about their IQs are losers".
Einstein was known to downplay intelligence. Although I consider him obviously very smart under the definition I tend to use, he seemed to think his success was partly explainable just by his perseverance to stay with problems, and his child-like curiosity about the world that continued into adult years, unlike most (i.e. he was still curious what time and space meant in his 20s,30s,40s.....questions that children are known to ask about. Whereas most human adults seem to just get caught in their ways and cant be bothered by such child-like questions). Einstein's brain, btw was measured to have a mass of 1230g, nothing remarkable from the average adult human male, perhaps slightly less mass even.
As a side note, I have observed on the misc that whenever logic/puzzle/math type questions come up, that have objective answers that are not easily googled online, the IQcels seem to be suspiciously absent, and not answering the problems. Hmmmm, makes you think.
Even if it did had an ounce of truth in it, which it does not, exactly how much meaning would the statement "Tesla was more intelligent than Einstein" have? I mean you are falsely saying it's 202 to 160 in this case, but why should one say Tesla was in some sense, "smarter"? You see very quickly just how void of meaning any of this is.
Leonardo da Vinci had an.....IQ......of 220? Lol wtf does this even mean?
But you're a red IQcel, so it's pointless. To repeat: I'm convinced the only purpose the upper end of the IQ spectrum serves is to provide a means for someone who hasn't actually contributed anything of note, to say they are "smart". The misc is full of IQcels who praise IQ. They also seem to think that being introverted makes you some super-duper-mega-IQ genius by itself (lol). The actual intelligent people out there- your Einsteins, Stephen Hawking's, etc, are usually first to denounce the whole "smartness/IQ" nonsense.
Hawking: "People who boast about their IQs are losers".
Einstein was known to downplay intelligence. Although I consider him obviously very smart under the definition I tend to use, he seemed to think his success was partly explainable just by his perseverance to stay with problems, and his child-like curiosity about the world that continued into adult years, unlike most (i.e. he was still curious what time and space meant in his 20s,30s,40s.....questions that children are known to ask about. Whereas most human adults seem to just get caught in their ways and cant be bothered by such child-like questions). Einstein's brain, btw was measured to have a mass of 1230g, nothing remarkable from the average adult human male, perhaps slightly less mass even.
As a side note, I have observed on the misc that whenever logic/puzzle/math type questions come up, that have objective answers that are not easily googled online, the IQcels seem to be suspiciously absent, and not answering the problems. Hmmmm, makes you think.
10-03-2019, 10:34 AM
-
#113
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
Case in point.....just lol.Low IQ detected!
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
10-03-2019, 10:36 AM
-
#114
- kingmanaverage
- Terrible poster
-
- kingmanaverage
- Terrible poster
- Join Date: Dec 2013
- Posts: 15,250
- Rep Power: 107906
-
-
There are both more male geniuses and complete morons.
There's a much wider variation in intelligence among men, than among women.
There's a much wider variation in intelligence among men, than among women.
“Steroids is now just a word that the lazy and ignorant use to describe any guy that has more muscle and dedication than them”– Mike O'Hearn
"I am like getting the feeling of cumming in the gym; I'm getting the feeling of cumming at home; I'm getting the feeling of cumming backstage; when I pump up, when I pose out in front of 5000 people I get the same feeling, so I am cumming day and night. It's terrific, right? So you know, I am in heaven."
10-03-2019, 10:38 AM
-
#115
10-03-2019, 10:57 AM
-
#116
- solidus2k3
- Registered User
-
- solidus2k3
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2003
- Location: rofl land
- Age: 38
- Posts: 41,584
- Rep Power: 123781
-
-
would rather be an average iq chad than those guys
<HTC>
10-03-2019, 10:59 AM
-
#117
10-03-2019, 11:44 AM
-
#118
- MissMillieXS
- Registered User
-
- MissMillieXS
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 190
- Rep Power: 1653
-
-
Originally Posted By farmergainsbrah⏩
Soz brah, only going down the gym themed pic.. not ashamed to show my face. Halloween themed one better? 🎃How much attention do you need / how bad is your face if your avi is your butt?
I heart Iceman1800
10-03-2019, 12:03 PM
-
#119
- nothingshocking
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Location: Uranus, Gambia
- Posts: 36,399
- Subscribers: 5
- Rep Power: 952290
-
-
Originally Posted By 3basic5me⏩
no he's a chess playerIs Bohhy Fischer a genius?
10-03-2019, 12:25 PM
-
#120
- Jayl12345
- BB.com Platinum Member
-
- Jayl12345
- BB.com Platinum Member
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: Maryland, United States
- Posts: 6,686
- Rep Power: 59419
-
-
Everyone knows this is because women are denied the right to study and achieve genius status.
Misogynistic thread/
Mansplaining/
Not srs.
Misogynistic thread/
Mansplaining/
Not srs.
██ █ ★ █ ██ USMC 99-07. USA 09-Present.
Blumpkin Instructor
Anything less than the best is a felony
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts




