Forum
»
Anyone ever look at the moon and think
11-29-2019, 01:43 PM
-
#121
Originally Posted By BustaCapp⏩
Yeah there is no way they reconnected the module like that, especially on a first try. They can't even send man into space in 2019 it's laughable to think they did this in 1969.that's nothing
this chit is what was being broadcast 'live' to the masses when Apollo 11 was in progress srs..
this chit is what was being broadcast 'live' to the masses when Apollo 11 was in progress srs..
PC specs
i9 9900k/AMD RX 6800 16 GB/16 GB RAM/LG BX 65'' OLED/Gigabyte GS27QC 27''
OLED Master Race crew
1440p 120+ fps only crew
6'2 master race crew
Audiophile crew
Metal crew
Introvert/INTJ crew
German crew
If you aren't getting stronger you aren't getting bigger crew
11-29-2019, 01:45 PM
-
#122
11-29-2019, 01:50 PM
-
#123
- yeshli2nuts
- Registered User
-
- yeshli2nuts
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 9,269
- Rep Power: 50332
-
-
Originally Posted By eod8989⏩
It's so sad that there's actually a human being sitting behind the computer typing out eod's posts. Whether he feels the need to troll anonymous message boards or these posts are actually honest and he's just the biggest idiot in human history, either way it's so sad. eod, I really feel sorry for you.Still want an explanation how the lunar module was able to launch and reconnect with the command module that was traveling at 24,000 mph around the moon on such primitive technology
Never neg first but always neg back crew
11-29-2019, 01:52 PM
-
#124
Originally Posted By yeshli2nuts⏩
It's not crazy to ask how two manned objects traveling 30k mph managed to reconnect in the fuarkin 1960s.It's so sad that there's actually a human being sitting behind the computer typing out eod's posts. Whether he feels the need to troll anonymous message boards or these posts are actually honest and he's just the biggest idiot in human history, either way it's so sad. eod, I really feel sorry for you.
11-29-2019, 01:53 PM
-
#125
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
The idiocy in this thread is pathetic. We even have the resident flat earther red dusky chiming in. Fkn lol.
Amazing, the one thing in the post I am quoting here that can be checked for accuracy: the 24,000 mph number orbital speed you reference is......wrong. Surprise!
CSM for Apollo 11 was in a circular orbit at altitude around 69ish miles. Let's literally do the calculation.
mv^2/r = GMm/r^2
v = sqrt[GM/r]
v = sqrt[6.67*10^-11*7.35*10^22/1834652]
v = 1634 ish m/s = 3655 mph.
NOT 24,000 mph, hurrr.
You can also arrive at this approximate number by the orbital period: CSM was known to make the complete circle around the moon in about 119 min, or 2 hours. This is a circle of radius about 1140 miles. Speed = d/t = 2pi[1140]/2 = about 3581 mph- slightly different than above, since lots here is approximate.
To answer your non-point, people [who know much, much, more about the physics and math of orbital rendezvous than random miscers posting in this thread like yourself] along with computers, were able to calculate trajectories, and once in orbit, the LM was able to maneuver appropriately to finally dock with the CSM. More compete discussion:
https://space.stackexchange.com/ques...aving-the-moon
Smh at the idiocy in here though. Misc gonna misc.
Originally Posted By eod8989⏩
your posts on the subject of the moon landings have been repeatedly addressed, you just don't seem to care and continue to post the drivel. You probably think this is some "deep thinking" by questioning it, but in reality you seem to be clueless on matters of even basic physics, mathematics, and history of space exploration. Yes, humans went to the moon in 1969, and several times after that. Deal with it.Still want an explanation how the lunar module was able to launch and reconnect with the command module that was traveling at 24,000 mph around the moon on such primitive technology
Amazing, the one thing in the post I am quoting here that can be checked for accuracy: the 24,000 mph number orbital speed you reference is......wrong. Surprise!
CSM for Apollo 11 was in a circular orbit at altitude around 69ish miles. Let's literally do the calculation.
mv^2/r = GMm/r^2
v = sqrt[GM/r]
v = sqrt[6.67*10^-11*7.35*10^22/1834652]
v = 1634 ish m/s = 3655 mph.
NOT 24,000 mph, hurrr.
You can also arrive at this approximate number by the orbital period: CSM was known to make the complete circle around the moon in about 119 min, or 2 hours. This is a circle of radius about 1140 miles. Speed = d/t = 2pi[1140]/2 = about 3581 mph- slightly different than above, since lots here is approximate.
To answer your non-point, people [who know much, much, more about the physics and math of orbital rendezvous than random miscers posting in this thread like yourself] along with computers, were able to calculate trajectories, and once in orbit, the LM was able to maneuver appropriately to finally dock with the CSM. More compete discussion:
https://space.stackexchange.com/ques...aving-the-moon
Smh at the idiocy in here though. Misc gonna misc.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
11-29-2019, 01:55 PM
-
#126
- engj
- Registered User
-
- engj
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 18,637
- Rep Power: 113090
-
-
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
My other argument is if you don't believe it then go see it.The most shameful thing of all is that many people today do not believe we ever got there. The problem is so difficult that you cannot believe people figured out how to do it in the late 60's. You underestimate the power of human ingenuity, physics, mathematics, and engineering. It is possible to travel to space, make a computer, or build nuclear weapons using only your hands and simple machine tools. A smartphone has more computing power than would ever be required for these things. Srs. Where there is a will, there is a way. If we all focused our efforts on alternative sources of energy like we did on going to the moon, we could unite the planet in prosperity for centuries.
Go to NASA, see a launch, tour the VAB, look at the vehicles and other infrastructure. I stood under a Falcon 9 breaking the sound barrier, I watched the contrail disappear and main engine shut off as it left the upper atmosphere.
If you can look at the money and investment that has been made, as well as the current investment by private industry (SpaceX, Boeing, Blue Origin) on a daily basis and believe its all an elaborate charade put on by the government, then I have nothing left to say to you.
------♥♥-----
----♥♥-♥♥----
---♥♥---♥♥---
---♥♥---♥♥---
---♥♥---♥♥---
----♥♥-♥♥----
-----♥♥♥-----
----♥♥-♥♥----
---♥♥---♥♥---
--♥♥-----♥♥--
11-29-2019, 01:57 PM
-
#127
Originally Posted By engj⏩
The launches you see is what's called an illusion. The logical fallacy is you saw an object launch therefore that MUST mean there are people inside on their way to the space station. You can even see the arc yourself, they simply land them in the ocean miles away from the crowds.My other argument is if you don't believe it then go see it.
Go to NASA, see a launch, tour the VAB, look at the vehicles and other infrastructure. I stood under a Falcon 9 breaking the sound barrier, I watched the contrail disappear and main engine shut off as it left the upper atmosphere.
If you can look at the money and investment that has been made, as well as the current investment by private industry (SpaceX, Boeing, Blue Origin) on a daily basis and believe its all an elaborate charade put on by the government, then I have nothing left to say to you.
Go to NASA, see a launch, tour the VAB, look at the vehicles and other infrastructure. I stood under a Falcon 9 breaking the sound barrier, I watched the contrail disappear and main engine shut off as it left the upper atmosphere.
If you can look at the money and investment that has been made, as well as the current investment by private industry (SpaceX, Boeing, Blue Origin) on a daily basis and believe its all an elaborate charade put on by the government, then I have nothing left to say to you.
11-29-2019, 02:01 PM
-
#128
- SirFapsAIot
- YEAH YOU MAD
-
- SirFapsAIot
- YEAH YOU MAD
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Posts: 37,166
- Rep Power: 430786
-
-
damn crazy to see how many people actually believe that we made it to the moon, lmao, never been there and we'll never go to mars either, deal with it
11-29-2019, 02:02 PM
-
#129
- JoeDelts
- Registered User
-
- JoeDelts
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2018
- Age: 52
- Posts: 13,120
- Rep Power: 134131
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
It still seems unlikely that engineers would accept this level of shoddy construction even on non-structural components. Even if for no other reason than you wouldn't want all of your work (and the aesthetics) to be "tainted" by something that would be so cheap and easy to do relative to the time and money that's already been sunk into the project.I don't believe those are the actual panels the lander is made out of, they're sheets of metal used for shielding. Serves no structural purpose. The whole thing looks like it's covered in aluminium foil, but so are more modern pieces of space equipment.
11-29-2019, 02:03 PM
-
#130
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
Idc about the physics or math behind it all, there is no compelling evidence we went besides some stupid moon rocks. The footage is fake. The photos are fake. They destroyed/lost the tapes. Nobody else on this planet has been to the moon 50 years later. Buzz and Neil developed mental problems after. None of it makes sense dude.The idiocy in this thread is pathetic. We even have the resident flat earther red dusky chiming in. Fkn lol.
your posts on the subject of the moon landings have been repeatedly addressed, you just don't seem to care and continue to post the drivel. You probably think this is some "deep thinking" by questioning it, but in reality you seem to be clueless on matters of even basic physics, mathematics, and history of space exploration. Yes, humans went to the moon in 1969, and several times after that. Deal with it.
Amazing, the one thing in the post I am quoting here that can be checked for accuracy: the 24,000 mph number orbital speed you reference is......wrong. Surprise!
CSM for Apollo 11 was in a circular orbit at altitude around 69ish miles. Let's literally do the calculation.
mv^2/r = GMm/r^2
v = sqrt[GM/r]
v = sqrt[6.67*10^-11*7.35*10^22/1834652]
v = 1634 ish m/s = 3655 mph.
NOT 24,000 mph, hurrr.
You can also arrive at this approximate number by the orbital period: CSM was known to make the complete circle around the moon in about 119 min, or 2 hours. This is a circle of radius about 1140 miles. Speed = d/t = 2pi[1140]/2 = about 3581 mph- slightly different than above, since lots here is approximate.
To answer your non-point, people [who know much, much, more about the physics and math of orbital rendezvous than random miscers posting in this thread like yourself] along with computers, were able to calculate trajectories, and once in orbit, the LM was able to maneuver appropriately to finally dock with the CSM. More compete discussion:
https://space.stackexchange.com/ques...aving-the-moon
Smh at the idiocy in here though. Misc gonna misc.
your posts on the subject of the moon landings have been repeatedly addressed, you just don't seem to care and continue to post the drivel. You probably think this is some "deep thinking" by questioning it, but in reality you seem to be clueless on matters of even basic physics, mathematics, and history of space exploration. Yes, humans went to the moon in 1969, and several times after that. Deal with it.
Amazing, the one thing in the post I am quoting here that can be checked for accuracy: the 24,000 mph number orbital speed you reference is......wrong. Surprise!
CSM for Apollo 11 was in a circular orbit at altitude around 69ish miles. Let's literally do the calculation.
mv^2/r = GMm/r^2
v = sqrt[GM/r]
v = sqrt[6.67*10^-11*7.35*10^22/1834652]
v = 1634 ish m/s = 3655 mph.
NOT 24,000 mph, hurrr.
You can also arrive at this approximate number by the orbital period: CSM was known to make the complete circle around the moon in about 119 min, or 2 hours. This is a circle of radius about 1140 miles. Speed = d/t = 2pi[1140]/2 = about 3581 mph- slightly different than above, since lots here is approximate.
To answer your non-point, people [who know much, much, more about the physics and math of orbital rendezvous than random miscers posting in this thread like yourself] along with computers, were able to calculate trajectories, and once in orbit, the LM was able to maneuver appropriately to finally dock with the CSM. More compete discussion:
https://space.stackexchange.com/ques...aving-the-moon
Smh at the idiocy in here though. Misc gonna misc.
Just because you can do some calculations doesn't mean it happened. Show me the proof.
PC specs
i9 9900k/AMD RX 6800 16 GB/16 GB RAM/LG BX 65'' OLED/Gigabyte GS27QC 27''
OLED Master Race crew
1440p 120+ fps only crew
6'2 master race crew
Audiophile crew
Metal crew
Introvert/INTJ crew
German crew
If you aren't getting stronger you aren't getting bigger crew
11-29-2019, 02:04 PM
-
#131
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
It is much easier to fool a man than convince him he has been fooled.It makes sense that this guy is a flat earther, since he thinks that since you can see the arc, it must be coming back to Earth. He can't even comprehend that an object can be in orbit. Just LOL.
-Mark Twain
11-29-2019, 02:05 PM
-
#132
- SirFapsAIot
- YEAH YOU MAD
-
- SirFapsAIot
- YEAH YOU MAD
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Posts: 37,166
- Rep Power: 430786
-
-
Originally Posted By eod8989⏩
Dude thinks we went to the moon, he may as well believe in flat earth. Don't waste your time with him.Idc about the physics or math behind it all, there is no compelling evidence we went besides some stupid moon rocks. The footage is fake. The photos are fake. They destroyed/lost the tapes. Nobody else on this planet has been to the moon 50 years later. Buzz and Neil developed mental problems after. None of it makes sense dude.
Just because you can do some calculations doesn't mean it happened. Show me the proof.
Just because you can do some calculations doesn't mean it happened. Show me the proof.
11-29-2019, 02:06 PM
-
#133
- engj
- Registered User
-
- engj
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 18,637
- Rep Power: 113090
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
The key to what I wrote was 'nothing left to say to you'. People who have the time and inclination trying to disprove outer space or space travel exists are either trolling, or dealing with a mental deficiency.It makes sense that this guy is a flat earther, since he thinks that since you can see the arc, it must be coming back to Earth. He can't even comprehend that an object can be in orbit. Just LOL.
You are putting energy into someone who is trying to get you mad or struggling with the limitations of their own 60 watt brain, so its best to leave them be.
------♥♥-----
----♥♥-♥♥----
---♥♥---♥♥---
---♥♥---♥♥---
---♥♥---♥♥---
----♥♥-♥♥----
-----♥♥♥-----
----♥♥-♥♥----
---♥♥---♥♥---
--♥♥-----♥♥--
11-29-2019, 02:07 PM
-
#134
Originally Posted By eod8989⏩
he doesn't know either he just pretending to know what he is talking about he shows up in every thread pretending to know stuff.Idc about the physics or math behind it all, there is no compelling evidence we went besides some stupid moon rocks. The footage is fake. The photos are fake. They destroyed/lost the tapes. Nobody else on this planet has been to the moon 50 years later. Buzz and Neil developed mental problems after. None of it makes sense dude.
Just because you can do some calculations doesn't mean it happened. Show me the proof.
Just because you can do some calculations doesn't mean it happened. Show me the proof.
11-29-2019, 02:08 PM
-
#135
Originally Posted By engj⏩
We can test things here on earth and witness them ourselves to prove their existence. Space travel however is inaccessible and you rely on a downward flow of information from the top of the hierarchy, much like a priest in medieval times. This may shock you but men lie.The key to what I wrote was 'nothing left to say to you'. People who have the time and inclination trying to disprove outer space or space travel exists are either trolling, or dealing with a mental deficiency.
You are putting in energy to someone who is trying to get you mad, or struggling with the limitations of their own 60 watt brain, so its best to leave them be.
You are putting in energy to someone who is trying to get you mad, or struggling with the limitations of their own 60 watt brain, so its best to leave them be.
11-29-2019, 02:10 PM
-
#136
- engj
- Registered User
-
- engj
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 18,637
- Rep Power: 113090
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Gotta get some of these guys switched to LED, would help society advance.I know, I am just laughing at him.
BTW, 60 watt brain would mean he's putting more than half of the energy output of his body into his brain. Nah, he's got a power saving model, probably 5 watts or so.
BTW, 60 watt brain would mean he's putting more than half of the energy output of his body into his brain. Nah, he's got a power saving model, probably 5 watts or so.
------♥♥-----
----♥♥-♥♥----
---♥♥---♥♥---
---♥♥---♥♥---
---♥♥---♥♥---
----♥♥-♥♥----
-----♥♥♥-----
----♥♥-♥♥----
---♥♥---♥♥---
--♥♥-----♥♥--
11-29-2019, 02:15 PM
-
#137
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By eod8989⏩
Wrong. Mountains of evidence were pointed out to you in previous threads....not wasting time repeating it in the 5th identical thread on the subject. A google search is seconds away. The math btw was used to point out that literally the one thing you mentioned in that post that could be checked for accuracy- the 24,000 mph number- is wrong. Wouldn't expect anything more from someone producing these garbage tier posts though. You asked a rather specific question- how the ascent stage of the LM was able to dock with the CSM. If you bothered to read the stackexchange link, you'd have answers.Idc about the physics or math behind it all, there is no compelling evidence we went besides some stupid moon rocks. The footage is fake. The photos are fake. They destroyed/lost the tapes. Nobody else on this planet has been to the moon 50 years later. Buzz and Neil developed mental problems after. None of it makes sense dude.
Just because you can do some calculations doesn't mean it happened. Show me the proof.
Just because you can do some calculations doesn't mean it happened. Show me the proof.
Btw the Lunar Module and its appearance was already discussed to death in previous threads- there are very specific reasons it has the appearance of crumpled gold foil, etc. if miscers would spend like 10 minutes searching out answers to these points, they would have their answers. Instead they mindlessly post drivel.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
11-29-2019, 02:17 PM
-
#138
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Dusky is a flat earther, see the 50+ page flat earth thread on here that has since been locked.It makes sense that this guy is a flat earther, since he thinks that since you can see the arc, it must be coming back to Earth. He can't even comprehend that an object can be in orbit. Just LOL.
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...4761871&page=1
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
11-29-2019, 02:20 PM
-
#139
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
The only one claiming to be anything is you. I don't claim to know the truth, I weigh the evidence for both sides. The fact is that you have never seen any curvature. It's interesting how children are taught the earth is round before they even learn to crawl.Dusky is a flat earther, see the 50+ page flat earth thread on here that has since been locked.
11-29-2019, 02:29 PM
-
#140
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By dusky99⏩
The title of that thread you authored is literally "The earth is FLAT (srs)". You aren't claiming anything? Just lol.The only one claiming to be anything is you. I don't claim to know the truth, I weigh the evidence for both sides. The fact is that you have never seen any curvature. It's interesting how children are taught the earth is round before they even learn to crawl.
If anyone wants some entertainment, go through the thread and see his arguments getting wrecked one after the next. And when I say arguments, I mean some mindless picture with some false premise or fundamental misunderstanding of basic science. Pretty funny.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
11-29-2019, 02:35 PM
-
#141
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Uh no? The windows on airplane passenger seats are curved. See it makes you question things when people's beliefs are based on something like curved airplane windows.You can see the curvature on any long distance flight...
Edit : You can prove curvature at any sunset at a beach too.
Edit : You can prove curvature at any sunset at a beach too.
11-29-2019, 02:36 PM
-
#142
11-29-2019, 02:47 PM
-
#143
- knightofday
- Registered User
-
- knightofday
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2013
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 14,588
- Rep Power: 126002
-
-
Originally Posted By dusky99⏩
I seriously feel stupid for skimming through this whole thread, your posts are retarded. Youre either a terrible troll or are incredibly stupid IRL, either way your posts are trash hahahaUh no? The windows on airplane passenger seats are curved. See it makes you question things when people's beliefs are based on something like curved airplane windows.
11-29-2019, 02:49 PM
-
#144
Originally Posted By knightofday⏩
Something as easily observable as the fact that airplane windows are curved is funny to you?I seriously feel stupid for skimming through this whole thread, your posts are retarded. Youre either a terrible troll or are incredibly stupid IRL, either way your posts are trash hahaha
11-29-2019, 03:02 PM
-
#145
Originally Posted By messomi⏩
They can talk about the math all they want but it doesn't mean it happened. There is no proof. Just some crappy evidence like fake videos and moon rocks they probably think are real because the government says so.he doesn't know either he just pretending to know what he is talking about he shows up in every thread pretending to know stuff.
If any of the videos of the landing or photos of the landing looked real i would have an easier time believing it but i can't believe any of that fake ass footage
PC specs
i9 9900k/AMD RX 6800 16 GB/16 GB RAM/LG BX 65'' OLED/Gigabyte GS27QC 27''
OLED Master Race crew
1440p 120+ fps only crew
6'2 master race crew
Audiophile crew
Metal crew
Introvert/INTJ crew
German crew
If you aren't getting stronger you aren't getting bigger crew
11-29-2019, 03:13 PM
-
#146
- MajorTendonitis
- Join Date: Jan 2016
- Location: East Kootenays BC
- Age: 65
- Height: 5'8"
- Weight: 241 lbs
- Posts: 42,091
- Subscribers: 8
- Rep Power: 719875
-
-
The best lol I had is when I was watching the news and someone from nasa said they would have the technology to go too the moon in 2020 . I’m like wtf ?
Back with my Fam
11-29-2019, 03:19 PM
-
#147
Originally Posted By MajorTendonitis⏩
you mean 2024 and by then they will probably delay a couple of more years they recently crashed unmanned vehicles trying to attempt at a landing.The best lol I had is when I was watching the news and someone from nasa said they would have the technology to go too the moon in 2020 . I’m like wtf ?
11-29-2019, 04:37 PM
-
#148
- AWillis
- Social Media Influencer
-
- AWillis
- Social Media Influencer
- Join Date: Jun 2012
- Location: Trump Towers
- Height: 6'0"
- Weight: 175 lbs
- Posts: 40,383
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 197859
-
-
recently a flat earther group on ********, with 20,000+ members was deleted... admins don't know why. someone out there doesn't want whatever they are discussing to be out there in public....
Cobra Kai Crew
srs
11-29-2019, 04:44 PM
-
#149
- BustaCapp
- Delivering Negs
-
- BustaCapp
- Delivering Negs
- Join Date: Dec 2002
- Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 27,158
- Rep Power: 346296
-
-
Originally Posted By yeshli2nuts⏩
This post made me piss my pants srs.It's so sad that there's actually a human being sitting behind the computer typing out eod's posts. Whether he feels the need to troll anonymous message boards or these posts are actually honest and he's just the biggest idiot in human history, either way it's so sad. eod, I really feel sorry for you.
fist yourself
11-29-2019, 04:45 PM
-
#150
Also why is Buzz crying every time he talks about it. If he was a hero that actually landed on the moon why does he have such psychological problems? I've never seen an old man act like him (it's funny because she actually seems sharp for his age, but he is hiding something)
PC specs
i9 9900k/AMD RX 6800 16 GB/16 GB RAM/LG BX 65'' OLED/Gigabyte GS27QC 27''
OLED Master Race crew
1440p 120+ fps only crew
6'2 master race crew
Audiophile crew
Metal crew
Introvert/INTJ crew
German crew
If you aren't getting stronger you aren't getting bigger crew
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts