Forum
»
Antifa protester headshotted with tear gas canister (NSFW)
07-12-2020, 03:09 PM
-
#61
Originally Posted By HairyWBush⏩
0 fuks given. these are the violent people participating in the march to destroy this country. i have no sympathy for these people.
^this, these things happen when you wage war0 fuks given. these are the violent people participating in the march to destroy this country. i have no sympathy for these people.
Mother north, united we stand, together we walk
Phantom north, I'll be there when you hunt them down.
Absolutely Love This For You! ❤️💕
Take America Back Again!
Verified 37 Going on 60
Verified Fat Boy
07-12-2020, 03:10 PM
-
#62
07-12-2020, 03:12 PM
-
#63
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
-
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Cajun Country
- Age: 40
- Height: 5'7"
- Weight: 185 lbs
- Posts: 52,752
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 419812
-
-
Originally Posted By Holyfenix⏩
I’m not familiar with that movement. Based on the context, it seems to have either been the start of, or at least facilitate the development of the Nazi party?Do you think the German government should have been harsher on brown shirt protestors before the rise of Nazism?
Are you concerned about this happening in the US? I am not. I feel confident that it won’t.
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“
PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
07-12-2020, 03:15 PM
-
#64
- demfeelsbro
- Jelqbrah
-
- demfeelsbro
- Jelqbrah
- Join Date: Mar 2014
- Posts: 15,441
- Rep Power: 127013
-
-
Damn!! I absolutely detest antifa and all the 'peaceful protestors', but that vid of him choking on his blood was tough to watch. Hopefully, this will show them that their feelings can't cancel bullets and they should just retire back to their basements
07-12-2020, 03:15 PM
-
#65
- Wh1teDyn0mite
- Registered User
-
- Wh1teDyn0mite
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Location: Croydon, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 34
- Posts: 18,736
- Rep Power: 62758
-
-
Play stupid games
1/4 Jamaican
1/4 Polish
1/4 Irish
1/4 Welsh
07-12-2020, 03:26 PM
-
#66
07-12-2020, 03:26 PM
-
#67
- puzzycrookz
- Banned
-
- puzzycrookz
- Banned
- Join Date: Dec 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 3,400
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Why not just stay home and out of danger from protest escalations?
07-12-2020, 03:32 PM
-
#68
- TurkBrah
- Zero Supplementation
-
- TurkBrah
- Zero Supplementation
- Join Date: Jun 2008
- Location: District Of Columbia, United States
- Posts: 15,270
- Rep Power: 50089
-
-
Even tho hes a huge *******, i feel bad for him. Hope he learns a lesson.
I doubt cop intentionally shot him in the head. Probably an unlucky shot.
I doubt cop intentionally shot him in the head. Probably an unlucky shot.
07-12-2020, 03:38 PM
-
#69
- exxtracool
- Registered User
-
- exxtracool
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2018
- Location: Canada
- Age: 34
- Posts: 20,766
- Rep Power: 77972
-
-
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
i dont think anyone is celebrating the use of force here. im sure even the most "fuk em up" brahs here would rather there NOT be any of this going on, right?I mean, you can get good at anything if you practice enough.
I do acknowledge and understand this is a stressful situation for everyone involved. And I subscribe to your thought experiment of comparing it to a different type of protest.
But again, I have to go back to the inherent need for cops to be more composed in stressful situations.
Their jobs demand it. Not only are they trained on the weapons systems and their appropriate use, but also conflict deescalation and other more “human” (for lack of a better term) aspects of conflict.
He doesn’t get get a free pass due to being in a relatively more stressful situation.
I haven’t said this yet, but it is worth saying. If it was an accident, I do feel horrible for the cop. Not only is his standard of living about to significantly decrease, but he has to live with accidentally hurting another person. Simply because he was born human and not God.
I know a lot of you guys disagree, but I cannot celebrate any use of force. Sometimes it is required, and this is just a part of these fields, but that doesn’t mean it should be celebrated. If this was an accident, and this cop is just a guy providing a living for his family while serving his community, then I would like to believe he may experience some emotional pain for accidentally harming another human to such a significant degree.
Based on the concepts I discussed in earlier posts, and after reviewing the video, I do not believe it to be an accident.
I do acknowledge and understand this is a stressful situation for everyone involved. And I subscribe to your thought experiment of comparing it to a different type of protest.
But again, I have to go back to the inherent need for cops to be more composed in stressful situations.
Their jobs demand it. Not only are they trained on the weapons systems and their appropriate use, but also conflict deescalation and other more “human” (for lack of a better term) aspects of conflict.
He doesn’t get get a free pass due to being in a relatively more stressful situation.
I haven’t said this yet, but it is worth saying. If it was an accident, I do feel horrible for the cop. Not only is his standard of living about to significantly decrease, but he has to live with accidentally hurting another person. Simply because he was born human and not God.
I know a lot of you guys disagree, but I cannot celebrate any use of force. Sometimes it is required, and this is just a part of these fields, but that doesn’t mean it should be celebrated. If this was an accident, and this cop is just a guy providing a living for his family while serving his community, then I would like to believe he may experience some emotional pain for accidentally harming another human to such a significant degree.
Based on the concepts I discussed in earlier posts, and after reviewing the video, I do not believe it to be an accident.
the problem that i see with all of this is that there isnt a clear distinction being made between what we consider to be protest and what we consider to be violent rioting. wheres the line? imo when a protester engages law enforcement whether in retaliation or not, they cease to be protesters.
considering antifa to be protesters is a HUGE stretch imo. antifa have made it very clear that their intentions are to push their politically driven narrative in a violent way in attempts to change how american society operates on a fundamental level... if the KKK or any other far-right extremist group started rioting and engaging the police, would we still be having a debate as to whether or not the police should counter their violence with violence in order to stop them? i dont think so.
07-12-2020, 03:39 PM
-
#70
- LegDayLol
- Registered User
-
- LegDayLol
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2017
- Age: 36
- Posts: 5,248
- Rep Power: 18084
-
-
Oh damn, I guess being an actual domestic terrorist has its downsides
I identify as a chad with a jawline so chiseled it can cut diamond, don't assume my genetics
The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago, the second best time in now
07-12-2020, 03:43 PM
-
#71
07-12-2020, 03:44 PM
-
#72
- NattyOverlord
- Certified Natty
-
- NattyOverlord
- Certified Natty
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Location: United States
- Age: 35
- Posts: 1,324
- Rep Power: 8687
-
-
He will receive the Purple Dildo from Antifa for his courage in battle.
we are Anonmouse
we are Region
forgive and forget
Expecto Patrolum
inb4 pWally
07-12-2020, 03:45 PM
-
#73
- TypeNirvash
- World Warrior
-
- TypeNirvash
- World Warrior
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Posts: 23,195
- Rep Power: 26070
-
-
Originally Posted By TugOfPeace⏩
Humanity, for better or worse, has always relied on some amount of strong emotional response to survive.I've always tried explaining to a certain family member (hardcore leftist) that they need to learn to take their emotions out of the situation because it serves no place in politics. Their response is that they just can't control it.
This family member of mine is in a very competitive medical program too. If a person like that who was raised with good morals and a strong family can't control their emotions.. the rest of society is largely screwed, IMO.
I always try to calmly reason with people to try and understand their views.. but they resort to ad hominem attacks and emotional outbursts. Even people 30 years my senior don't even want to discuss politics because they're so deep rooted in their beliefs.
It's led me to believe that the vast, vast majority of people are only intelligent from a booksmart perspective. Hardly anyone out there is calm and collected and without ego.
Politics should be discussed without emotion, without bias, but that never happens.
Ideally political discourse should occur as follows:
Person A presents an argument
Person B must present a counterargument, but ONLY if it is an argument based on logic and reason
If that criteria is met, Person A must counter argue, again ONLY with logic and reason
That process needs to be repeated as long as it needs to until a solution is found.
This family member of mine is in a very competitive medical program too. If a person like that who was raised with good morals and a strong family can't control their emotions.. the rest of society is largely screwed, IMO.
I always try to calmly reason with people to try and understand their views.. but they resort to ad hominem attacks and emotional outbursts. Even people 30 years my senior don't even want to discuss politics because they're so deep rooted in their beliefs.
It's led me to believe that the vast, vast majority of people are only intelligent from a booksmart perspective. Hardly anyone out there is calm and collected and without ego.
Politics should be discussed without emotion, without bias, but that never happens.
Ideally political discourse should occur as follows:
Person A presents an argument
Person B must present a counterargument, but ONLY if it is an argument based on logic and reason
If that criteria is met, Person A must counter argue, again ONLY with logic and reason
That process needs to be repeated as long as it needs to until a solution is found.
Naturally, there will always be almost some emotionally charged response to issues some may consider moral/ethical dilemmas. For most, it can be quite hard to entertain other views that are outside of what one's own morality says is "just and fair."
Now, more than ever, emotions have become flared. While it is important to level them appropriately when having a conversation, you have to understand that society has asked most of us to be emotionally charged.
You are correct, however, that we will never begin to have real conversations when we dictate that the party in front of us isevil.
07-12-2020, 03:47 PM
-
#74
Originally Posted By TugOfPeace⏩
wishful thinking lol. this is why i cannot take anyone who think emotionally seriously as a human beingI've always tried explaining to a certain family member (hardcore leftist) that they need to learn to take their emotions out of the situation because it serves no place in politics. Their response is that they just can't control it.
This family member of mine is in a very competitive medical program too. If a person like that who was raised with good morals and a strong family can't control their emotions.. the rest of society is largely screwed, IMO.
I always try to calmly reason with people to try and understand their views.. but they resort to ad hominem attacks and emotional outbursts. Even people 30 years my senior don't even want to discuss politics because they're so deep rooted in their beliefs.
It's led me to believe that the vast, vast majority of people are only intelligent from a booksmart perspective. Hardly anyone out there is calm and collected and without ego.
Politics should be discussed without emotion, without bias, but that never happens.
Ideally political discourse should occur as follows:
Person A presents an argument
Person B must present a counterargument, but ONLY if it is an argument based on logic and reason
If that criteria is met, Person A must counter argue, again ONLY with logic and reason
That process needs to be repeated as long as it needs to until a solution is found.
This family member of mine is in a very competitive medical program too. If a person like that who was raised with good morals and a strong family can't control their emotions.. the rest of society is largely screwed, IMO.
I always try to calmly reason with people to try and understand their views.. but they resort to ad hominem attacks and emotional outbursts. Even people 30 years my senior don't even want to discuss politics because they're so deep rooted in their beliefs.
It's led me to believe that the vast, vast majority of people are only intelligent from a booksmart perspective. Hardly anyone out there is calm and collected and without ego.
Politics should be discussed without emotion, without bias, but that never happens.
Ideally political discourse should occur as follows:
Person A presents an argument
Person B must present a counterargument, but ONLY if it is an argument based on logic and reason
If that criteria is met, Person A must counter argue, again ONLY with logic and reason
That process needs to be repeated as long as it needs to until a solution is found.
See user title srs
07-12-2020, 04:04 PM
-
#75
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
-
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Cajun Country
- Age: 40
- Height: 5'7"
- Weight: 185 lbs
- Posts: 52,752
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 419812
-
-
Originally Posted By exxtracool⏩
I agree, where is the line?i dont think anyone is celebrating the use of force here. im sure even the most "fuk em up" brahs here would rather there NOT be any of this going on, right?
the problem that i see with all of this is that there isnt a clear distinction being made between what we consider to be protest and what we consider to be violent rioting. wheres the line? imo when a protester engages law enforcement whether in retaliation or not, they cease to be protesters.
considering antifa to be protesters is a HUGE stretch imo. antifa have made it very clear that their intentions are to push their politically driven narrative in a violent way in attempts to change how american society operates on a fundamental level... if the KKK or any other far-right extremist group started rioting and engaging the police, would we still be having a debate as to whether or not the police should counter their violence with violence in order to stop them? i dont think so.
the problem that i see with all of this is that there isnt a clear distinction being made between what we consider to be protest and what we consider to be violent rioting. wheres the line? imo when a protester engages law enforcement whether in retaliation or not, they cease to be protesters.
considering antifa to be protesters is a HUGE stretch imo. antifa have made it very clear that their intentions are to push their politically driven narrative in a violent way in attempts to change how american society operates on a fundamental level... if the KKK or any other far-right extremist group started rioting and engaging the police, would we still be having a debate as to whether or not the police should counter their violence with violence in order to stop them? i dont think so.
Antifa absolutely should be addressed on every legal and civil platform available. 100%
There is value in examining historical events (rise of the Nazi party and KKK are good examples you brought up). We have the hindsight to better understand those processes, and it is relevant to apply them to this scenario. Where is the line? I 100% support the civil liberties of members of the KKK, despite completely disagreeing with their ideology.
If we do this right, we will never know. If we **** it up (either direction), we will never forget.
The subjective line, is based on our own perceptions and interpretations of present and past events.
The objective line, the one I try to walk as firmly as possible, is the constitution.
The constitution gives the KKK the right to assemble, and discuss their ideology. As the wise Peter Griffin once said, “while I don’t agree with what you are saying, I will defend to the death your right to say it....”. (Moments just prior to succumbing to injuries he received while fighting a chicken, 2005, colorized)
The constitution does not have room for inappropriate government use of force.
It is supposed to protect us against that.
The one line, we should all agree on, is the constitution. It is fair for all American citizens, and is generally easy to understand and apply to different events individual from each other, regardless of personal political beliefs about the events.
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“
PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
07-12-2020, 04:06 PM
-
#76
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
-
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Posts: 44,104
- Rep Power: 271274
-
-
It's like this: He got involved with something where there were risks. Took his chances and his chances are up. It's not about if he deserves it or not, but it's the reality of what happens.
IF he were going to or at work this wouldn't have happened.
IF he were going to or at work this wouldn't have happened.
07-12-2020, 04:09 PM
-
#77
- Smegmalion
- Entire NYPD should go on
-
- Smegmalion
- Entire NYPD should go on
- Join Date: Feb 2011
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona, United States
- Posts: 5,656
- Rep Power: 31310
-
-
Originally Posted By TugOfPeace⏩
Human beings think they are rational 90% of the time, and emotional 10% of the time. It is actually just the opposite.I've always tried explaining to a certain family member (hardcore leftist) that they need to learn to take their emotions out of the situation because it serves no place in politics. Their response is that they just can't control it.
This family member of mine is in a very competitive medical program too. If a person like that who was raised with good morals and a strong family can't control their emotions.. the rest of society is largely screwed, IMO.
I always try to calmly reason with people to try and understand their views.. but they resort to ad hominem attacks and emotional outbursts. Even people 30 years my senior don't even want to discuss politics because they're so deep rooted in their beliefs.
It's led me to believe that the vast, vast majority of people are only intelligent from a booksmart perspective. Hardly anyone out there is calm and collected and without ego.
Politics should be discussed without emotion, without bias, but that never happens.
Ideally political discourse should occur as follows:
Person A presents an argument
Person B must present a counterargument, but ONLY if it is an argument based on logic and reason
If that criteria is met, Person A must counter argue, again ONLY with logic and reason
That process needs to be repeated as long as it needs to until a solution is found.
This family member of mine is in a very competitive medical program too. If a person like that who was raised with good morals and a strong family can't control their emotions.. the rest of society is largely screwed, IMO.
I always try to calmly reason with people to try and understand their views.. but they resort to ad hominem attacks and emotional outbursts. Even people 30 years my senior don't even want to discuss politics because they're so deep rooted in their beliefs.
It's led me to believe that the vast, vast majority of people are only intelligent from a booksmart perspective. Hardly anyone out there is calm and collected and without ego.
Politics should be discussed without emotion, without bias, but that never happens.
Ideally political discourse should occur as follows:
Person A presents an argument
Person B must present a counterargument, but ONLY if it is an argument based on logic and reason
If that criteria is met, Person A must counter argue, again ONLY with logic and reason
That process needs to be repeated as long as it needs to until a solution is found.
Entire NYPD should go on strike. You'll see then how quickly the mayor changes his tone.
"Dig with your hands, not with your mouths"
Entire NYPD should go on strike. You'll see then how quickly the mayor changes his tone.
07-12-2020, 04:12 PM
-
#78
07-12-2020, 04:19 PM
-
#79
07-12-2020, 04:28 PM
-
#80
- p100
- Banned
-
- p100
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: Texas, United States
- Posts: 7,379
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Two wrongs don't make a right.
Antifa/communism is bad.
Police brutality is bad.
Even anti-freedom people are protected by the first amendment.
Firstly I hope the injured guy becomes a good boi and gives up his antifa ways. If not idgaf if he recovers but he was definetely wronged by the police here.
Antifa/communism is bad.
Police brutality is bad.
Even anti-freedom people are protected by the first amendment.
Firstly I hope the injured guy becomes a good boi and gives up his antifa ways. If not idgaf if he recovers but he was definetely wronged by the police here.
07-12-2020, 04:32 PM
-
#81
Originally Posted By dabbmw2002⏩
Did not watch. There are kids in the house.If they were shining lights and throwing objects, they were rioters. If the cop aimed for his head, that's unacceptable. If it was unintentional and hit him randomly, than that's bad luck and he got a stupid prize for playing stupid games.
But assuming shot wasn't point black.
And no idea whether tear gas launchers have smooth bores. But assuming they do.
Regardless, I doubt the things are ever intended to be highly accurate.
I would assume aiming at/near someone and they get hit in the head can hardly be called intentional.
"Australia is a bi country" - Samuel Whitcombe Hyde
07-12-2020, 04:36 PM
-
#82
- OptimistPrime11
- Banned
-
- OptimistPrime11
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 8,834
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
Everytime you post I am reminded of what a complete idiot you really are.I saw a similar thread earlier. I figured the vidjya was brought down and OP found another one.
I’m not sure if they take it down for gore, or what? I’m not familiar with that platform.
So many comments defending the cop. I’m sure some miscers would too, but what is great about it is our comments and opinions don’t matter.
That cops career is over and I don’t see how this ends without him being in jail.
I’m not sure if they take it down for gore, or what? I’m not familiar with that platform.
So many comments defending the cop. I’m sure some miscers would too, but what is great about it is our comments and opinions don’t matter.
That cops career is over and I don’t see how this ends without him being in jail.
They were not police. They were feds. And they were shooting off tear gas canisters to clear the crowd that has been destroying Portland for 50 straight nights now.
A few seconds before the guy was hit, he threw back another tear gas canister. While standing withing 50 feet of the feds, he was hit by another one.
Now, I am no expert marksman when it comes to shooting, but I know for a 100% fact that shooting a tear gas canister is like shooting a bean bag from a shotgun. You have no idea where specifically is going to go.
So to say the fed was purposely trying to hit the idiot with tear gas from 50 feet away?
Just go away manlet....pack your knives and go.
07-12-2020, 04:36 PM
-
#83
- riley444
- literal angel
-
- riley444
- literal angel
- Join Date: May 2015
- Location: North Carolina, United States
- Posts: 24,210
- Rep Power: 316259
-
-
Looked up the extent of his injuries.
'Desiree LaBella, Donavan’s mother, said he suffered facial and skull fractures. He came out of surgery early Sunday morning and was responding to doctors. He was moving his arms and legs, Desiree LaBella said.
“He was awake enough to give the OK to talk to me,” she said. “He’s had some facial reconstruction surgery. They’re just watching him right now.”'
https://www.opb.org/news/article/fed...hal-munitions/
'Desiree LaBella, Donavan’s mother, said he suffered facial and skull fractures. He came out of surgery early Sunday morning and was responding to doctors. He was moving his arms and legs, Desiree LaBella said.
“He was awake enough to give the OK to talk to me,” she said. “He’s had some facial reconstruction surgery. They’re just watching him right now.”'
https://www.opb.org/news/article/fed...hal-munitions/
07-12-2020, 04:38 PM
-
#84
- OptimistPrime11
- Banned
-
- OptimistPrime11
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 8,834
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
These protestors have been destroying Portland and disrupting normal everyday activities for 50 straight nights. Not 1. Not 5. Not 20. Fifty. Five O.I mean, you can get good at anything if you practice enough.
I do acknowledge and understand this is a stressful situation for everyone involved. And I subscribe to your thought experiment of comparing it to a different type of protest.
But again, I have to go back to the inherent need for cops to be more composed in stressful situations.
Their jobs demand it. Not only are they trained on the weapons systems and their appropriate use, but also conflict deescalation and other more “human” (for lack of a better term) aspects of conflict.
He doesn’t get get a free pass due to being in a relatively more stressful situation.
I haven’t said this yet, but it is worth saying. If it was an accident, I do feel horrible for the cop. Not only is his standard of living about to significantly decrease, but he has to live with accidentally hurting another person. Simply because he was born human and not God.
I know a lot of you guys disagree, but I cannot celebrate any use of force. Sometimes it is required, and this is just a part of these fields, but that doesn’t mean it should be celebrated. If this was an accident, and this cop is just a guy providing a living for his family while serving his community, then I would like to believe he may experience some emotional pain for accidentally harming another human to such a significant degree.
Based on the concepts I discussed in earlier posts, and after reviewing the video, I do not believe it to be an accident.
I do acknowledge and understand this is a stressful situation for everyone involved. And I subscribe to your thought experiment of comparing it to a different type of protest.
But again, I have to go back to the inherent need for cops to be more composed in stressful situations.
Their jobs demand it. Not only are they trained on the weapons systems and their appropriate use, but also conflict deescalation and other more “human” (for lack of a better term) aspects of conflict.
He doesn’t get get a free pass due to being in a relatively more stressful situation.
I haven’t said this yet, but it is worth saying. If it was an accident, I do feel horrible for the cop. Not only is his standard of living about to significantly decrease, but he has to live with accidentally hurting another person. Simply because he was born human and not God.
I know a lot of you guys disagree, but I cannot celebrate any use of force. Sometimes it is required, and this is just a part of these fields, but that doesn’t mean it should be celebrated. If this was an accident, and this cop is just a guy providing a living for his family while serving his community, then I would like to believe he may experience some emotional pain for accidentally harming another human to such a significant degree.
Based on the concepts I discussed in earlier posts, and after reviewing the video, I do not believe it to be an accident.
Their cut me some slack' room for protesting has long since been over.
Have you seen the area they protest at every night? City hall? Justice center etc? Looks like a zombie apocalypse zone.
Screw you and your manlet pandering.
07-12-2020, 04:44 PM
-
#85
07-12-2020, 04:48 PM
-
#86
- OptimistPrime11
- Banned
-
- OptimistPrime11
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 8,834
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
Fawk you. Just F u.I’m not trying to suggest that they don’t happen. Like everything, law enforcement is a human process. None of us are immune to the human condition. I have made plenty of errors myself unintentionally.
What I’m saying is that when it does happen, it needs to be addressed. Certain fields have little room for the application of discretion when such accidents are made.
That being said, if this does go to court, and the defense defers to this being accident (which if it was an accident, they absolutely should) the prosecution is going to present all the detailed training records, training methods of instruction and application, they will bring in the department training section administrators, and they will show the likelihood of it it being a chance accident is less likely than it being intentional.
I’m not saying it doesn’t happen. I know it does. I’m saying regardless of intention, he should absolutely be held accountable.
What I’m saying is that when it does happen, it needs to be addressed. Certain fields have little room for the application of discretion when such accidents are made.
That being said, if this does go to court, and the defense defers to this being accident (which if it was an accident, they absolutely should) the prosecution is going to present all the detailed training records, training methods of instruction and application, they will bring in the department training section administrators, and they will show the likelihood of it it being a chance accident is less likely than it being intentional.
I’m not saying it doesn’t happen. I know it does. I’m saying regardless of intention, he should absolutely be held accountable.
I watch this guys channel. He streams multiple steams from multiple streamers every night.
Here is the stream from last night showing 5 or 6 different streamers at once from Portland, including the incident in question.
Bear in mind these 'protestors' have been doing this ever single night for 50 straight nights. EVERY single night. Not one night has this not happened. Look at that multi city block area. Looks like a war zone. THIS IS DOWNTOWN PORTLAND.
They attack the police. Taunt them. Destroy the community. Vandalize. Graffiti everywhere. Stop people from driving on the streets.
The person in question was clearly antagonizing the feds. 10 seconds before kicked a tear gas canister right back at the feds.
Get what deserve.
07-12-2020, 04:51 PM
-
#87
- whitepaper
- Registered User
-
- whitepaper
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2011
- Posts: 20,840
- Rep Power: 55720
-
-
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
Nothing will happen. Suspended with pay, and life will go on.There were some comments saying he was responsive and coming through.
I agree man, I don’t get these protests at all, I don’t agree with them, but for a cop to take it personal and do that to someone who is clearly not a threat, well, there will be plenty of witnesses at the trial if he isn’t offered/accepts a plea deal.
The video will be there too.
I agree man, I don’t get these protests at all, I don’t agree with them, but for a cop to take it personal and do that to someone who is clearly not a threat, well, there will be plenty of witnesses at the trial if he isn’t offered/accepts a plea deal.
The video will be there too.
Can you imagine the back-log of misconduct over the last few months? They'll just ignore it and wipe the slate clean, and only deal with the prominent cases that get enough attention.
2014 Misc Resolution: Negging no pics (screen captures of text don't count as pics)
HairyWBush Reps for life - Hamster Compassion: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=181804893
07-12-2020, 04:56 PM
-
#88
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
I hope in your pilot career that your superiors don't hold you to the same impossible standards that you somehow arbitrarily hold officers to, because you would've been dishonorably discharged by now. Doubtful that you've never made a mistake.I agree, where is the line?
Antifa absolutely should be addressed on every legal and civil platform available. 100%
There is value in examining historical events (rise of the Nazi party and KKK are good examples you brought up). We have the hindsight to better understand those processes, and it is relevant to apply them to this scenario. Where is the line? I 100% support the civil liberties of members of the KKK, despite completely disagreeing with their ideology.
If we do this right, we will never know. If we **** it up (either direction), we will never forget.
The subjective line, is based on our own perceptions and interpretations of present and past events.
The objective line, the one I try to walk as firmly as possible, is the constitution.
The constitution gives the KKK the right to assemble, and discuss their ideology. As the wise Peter Griffin once said, “while I don’t agree with what you are saying, I will defend to the death your right to say it....”. (Moments just prior to succumbing to injuries he received while fighting a chicken, 2005, colorized)
The constitution does not have room for inappropriate government use of force.
It is supposed to protect us against that.
The one line, we should all agree on, is the constitution. It is fair for all American citizens, and is generally easy to understand and apply to different events individual from each other, regardless of personal political beliefs about the events.
Antifa absolutely should be addressed on every legal and civil platform available. 100%
There is value in examining historical events (rise of the Nazi party and KKK are good examples you brought up). We have the hindsight to better understand those processes, and it is relevant to apply them to this scenario. Where is the line? I 100% support the civil liberties of members of the KKK, despite completely disagreeing with their ideology.
If we do this right, we will never know. If we **** it up (either direction), we will never forget.
The subjective line, is based on our own perceptions and interpretations of present and past events.
The objective line, the one I try to walk as firmly as possible, is the constitution.
The constitution gives the KKK the right to assemble, and discuss their ideology. As the wise Peter Griffin once said, “while I don’t agree with what you are saying, I will defend to the death your right to say it....”. (Moments just prior to succumbing to injuries he received while fighting a chicken, 2005, colorized)
The constitution does not have room for inappropriate government use of force.
It is supposed to protect us against that.
The one line, we should all agree on, is the constitution. It is fair for all American citizens, and is generally easy to understand and apply to different events individual from each other, regardless of personal political beliefs about the events.
What drivel, luckily the supreme court ruled in qualified immunity that the actions should not be judged by 20/20 hindsight that you seem to so lazily enjoy but the reasonableness of the officers' actions in the moment.
07-12-2020, 05:03 PM
-
#89
I hope that commie filth suffered a lot of pain.
I hope that soon, every single one of those, the leftist scum, gets dealt with violently and painfully.
They are evil terrorists who are seeking to destroy out nation. They deserve no sympathy or quarter.
I hope that soon, every single one of those, the leftist scum, gets dealt with violently and painfully.
They are evil terrorists who are seeking to destroy out nation. They deserve no sympathy or quarter.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts