Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » In WW2, Which Country Could Have Beaten Germany 1 on 1?
  1. Results 31 to 60 of 97
  2. Page 2 of 4
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  10. Last

Thread: In WW2, Which Country Could Have Beaten Germany 1 on 1?

post 1610578621 07-14-2020, 01:14 PM
-
#31
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 11,550
  6. Rep Power: 58418
Originally Posted By MaesterSeymour⏩
lol @ Jewish brainpower.

Look up Jewish scientists involved in the manhattan project
post 1610578831 07-14-2020, 01:15 PM
-
#32
  1. MIKES3
  2. GO HEAVY OR GO HOME!!!
  1. MIKES3
  2. GO HEAVY OR GO HOME!!!
  3. Join Date: Dec 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 4,700
  6. Rep Power: 8561
Originally Posted By MaesterSeymour⏩
lol @ Jewish brainpower.

I dont think Jewish is a country.
Chicago Crew



"ITS OK MIKE"
post 1610578911 07-14-2020, 01:17 PM
-
#33
  1. davik
  2. Interlinked
  1. davik
  2. Interlinked
  3. Join Date: Sep 2013
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 16,052
  6. Rep Power: 40443
too much pro allies propaganda, will bias answers anyway

im going with no one
post 1610579031 07-14-2020, 01:19 PM
-
#34
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 7,371
  6. Rep Power: 47124
Originally Posted By MaesterSeymour⏩
lol @ Jewish brainpower.

I wonder where America falls on this list if not being attached and diluted by #46.
post 1610579591 07-14-2020, 01:23 PM
-
#35
  1. Ravishing_Rick
  2. A Registered Mesomorph
  1. Ravishing_Rick
  2. A Registered Mesomorph
  3. Join Date: Oct 2008
  4. Posts: 115,847
  5. Rep Power: 279082
Umm Russia
*۩*legendary misc status*۩*
No Sloot Can Hurt A Man With Options~ Ravishing_Rick
all my bishes foreign PSN Ravishing_Rick
*No Porn Crew*
onlyfans/ricosmoovey
post 1610579641 07-14-2020, 01:24 PM
-
#36
  1. JaxBrah
  2. KAG
  1. JaxBrah
  2. KAG
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Posts: 16,521
  5. Rep Power: 49594
tough one.

honestly, Russia got their chit kicked in. The casualty rate for Russian soldiers was astronomical and the Nazis got within one stop from taking Moscow. They did this while still holding down the fort in western europe AND north africa.

imo theres no way russia stops the nazis in a full 1v1 scenario.

UK? fuking lol. only reason they werent folded in the matter of days was because Germany had the bulk of its land forces in Russia.

USA? probably the only true contender. The 1v1’d Japan despite having a large portion of their navy destroyed in one fell swoop, despite having to island hop across the entire pacific ocean, despite facing a seasoned force that already obliterated China, and despite also fighting in the western front.

USA vs Germany in a true 1v1 battle in western europe would have been very interesting. Id say the US would take it eventually as they would easily have the superior navy and could resupply endlessly. it would be a closer battle IF we give the UK to Germany and they can launch from the UK to attack mainland America
Certified 1200 ng/l T
post 1610580011 07-14-2020, 01:27 PM
-
#37
  1. Fatoichi
  2. Absolutely ghastly
  1. Fatoichi
  2. Absolutely ghastly
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Posts: 1,527
  5. Rep Power: 12072
Originally Posted By MaesterSeymour⏩
Germany started their nuclear weapons program as early as 1938 (sixyears before the Manhattan Project that began in 1942) ...
“Rarely do we find men who willingly engage in hard, solid thinking. There is an almost universal quest for easy answers and half-baked solutions. Nothing pains some people more than having to think.“ MLK Jr

“They who have put out the people’s eyes reproach them for their blindness” - John Milton
post 1610580121 07-14-2020, 01:28 PM
-
#38
  1. JStrez
  2. Breaker of Gains
  1. JStrez
  2. Breaker of Gains
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Location: New York, United States
  5. Posts: 9,748
  6. Rep Power: 54369
I think Russia or the USA could have easily beaten Germany in WW2.

Russia has a harsh landscape and I doubt the Germans would have been able to make a push into the country without suffering heavy casualties. Russia on it's home turf is notoriously hard to beat, and many have failed. I don't know much on Russia, but it would be tough. There was a belief that Russia could have beaten Germany without the USA's help.

USA kind of has the same thing. They have two long coast lines, a huge naval force, and natural borders from Mexico and Canada. Germany would have a hard time pushing into the country without being hampered. They would have had to fought a multiple front war, which would have been hard due to their resources. They'd have to travel essentially around Canada or South America to get through. We likely would have blown up the Panama Canal to prevent easy passage around the US. Couple that with the built in highways/railroads, the US would have vastly superior supply chains to fight the Germans on any front. Couple that with Major naval bases on both Coasts (San Fran and Norfolk), USA would dominate any battle on their land.

You might be able to throw Japan in there too based on it's natural defenses, but I think Germany could have bombed them into submission.

If you switched it over to the USA fighting Germany on their home turf, I still think the USA would win based on their supply chains, and ability to deploy and attack from either direction on Germany.
*Mechanical Engineering Crew*
*6'3" Master Race Crew*
*6 Figs Crew*

"Because the thing about repairing, maintaining, and cleaning is it’s not an adventure. There’s no way to do it so wrong you might die. It’s just work. And the bottom line is, some people are okay going to work, and some people … well, some people would rather die. Each of us gets to choose.”
post 1610580191 07-14-2020, 01:29 PM
-
#39
  1. DefensiveEnd896
  2. Registered User
  1. DefensiveEnd896
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 3,997
  6. Rep Power: 18863
No one could have it is pretty obvious. Of course ppl are biased on here so they will say America, Russia etc... But read the history books objectively and it's pretty clear Germany could have beaten any country 1on1
Proud Christian

Give This Day
Our Daily Bread
And Forgive Those Who
Trespass Against Us
post 1610580391 07-14-2020, 01:31 PM
-
#40
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 7,371
  6. Rep Power: 47124
Originally Posted By DefensiveEnd896⏩
No one could have it is pretty obvious. Of course ppl are biased on here so they will say America, Russia etc... But read the history books objectively and it's pretty clear Germany could have beaten any country 1on1
Why are you presenting your opinion on an entirely hypothetical as universal truth?
post 1610580821 07-14-2020, 01:35 PM
-
#41
  1. anonymous
  2. Guest
  1. anonymous
  2. Guest
  3. Join Date:
  4. Posts: 12,500
  5. Rep Power: 1
Originally Posted By DefensiveEnd896⏩
No one could have it is pretty obvious. Of course ppl are biased on here so they will say America, Russia etc... But read the history books objectively and it's pretty clear Germany could have beaten any country 1on1
They were THE military power.

Only area where they got mogged was with their navy. The British did have a superior navy.
Apart from that, they mogged all in nearly every area.

Serious propaganda taught in the US about both World Wars.
post 1610580931 07-14-2020, 01:36 PM
-
#42
  1. tornister
  2. Platinum member
  1. tornister
  2. Platinum member
  3. Join Date: Jan 2009
  4. Location: Poland
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 4,380
  7. Rep Power: 20081
Originally Posted By MaesterSeymour⏩
https://www.jrbooksonline.com/polish_atrocities.htm

nice revisionist website, look into actual sources about how germans tried to provoke war through sabotage and covert attacks by abwehra with final one that gave them casus beli:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incident

also this quote is fake

post 1610581111 07-14-2020, 01:37 PM
-
#43
  1. Dirtybiscuit
  2. Registered User
  1. Dirtybiscuit
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 1,982
  6. Rep Power: 14106
Russia would have won because you need to factor in the winter wars and how demoralizing and severe battles would be.

Plus US #1. If we would have let Patton do more and not force him to sit and wait, the war would have been finished sooner.

Lol at saying the sudoku bayonets. How will their navy even reach Germany? That was their only pro when they attacked Pearl Harbor
Blue eyed aphrodisiac
post 1610581151 07-14-2020, 01:37 PM
-
#44
  1. MassBB
  2. Registered User
  1. MassBB
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 127
  6. Rep Power: 307
USA cucks in their delusional world as usual. None of you have any idea what's its like being part of a country that has had real wars and not bullied some middle Eastern **** hole and call it a war.

Learn history outside of USA to get some truth, you wouldn't have stood a chance against Germany. France and UK were just as powerful militarily as USA at the time. Germany transformed into a pure war machine.

As for saving the UK, you came last minute when the allies already had the upper hand and claimed victory, just lol, cuckery at its highest.
Gloria a Dio
post 1610581431 07-14-2020, 01:40 PM
-
#45
  1. miscinbro
  2. Registered User
  1. miscinbro
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 22,420
  6. Rep Power: 46435
Originally Posted By MassBB⏩
USA cucks in their delusional world as usual. None of you have any idea what's its like being part of a country that has had real wars and not bullied some middle Eastern **** hole and call it a war.

Learn history outside of USA to get some truth, you wouldn't have stood a chance against Germany. France and UK were just as powerful militarily as USA at the time. Germany transformed into a pure war machine.

As for saving the UK, you came last minute when the allies already had the upper hand and claimed victory, just lol, cuckery at its highest.
France and the UK already had the upper hand by d-day? Holy sht, and you talk about needing to learn history?
post 1610581581 07-14-2020, 01:42 PM
-
#46
  1. miscinbro
  2. Registered User
  1. miscinbro
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 22,420
  6. Rep Power: 46435
I don’t think the question makes sense. If we were to play this out it would be Germany before they started invading Poland, etc. v. another nation. The nature of the war was that both Germany and Japan had to start taking over other nations and resources -fast- to ever have a chance and in doing so turned the rest of the world against them.

Germany as it existed before war started would have easily been defeated by the USA if for no other reason than our huge pool of natural resources.
post 1610581611 07-14-2020, 01:43 PM
-
#47
  1. rectifryer
  2. enlightened
  1. rectifryer
  2. enlightened
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Posts: 25,634
  5. Rep Power: 208783
All allied countries could tbh because Germany was very weak and merely used trickery and world politics to get others to do their work for them.
Boycott foodservice industry crew
post 1610581881 07-14-2020, 01:46 PM
-
#48
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 35,163
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 120982
Originally Posted By bov188⏩
Seems like they skipped that chapter. Did they really think they were going to start a war, rapidly expand, and not scale their supply chains?

The German approach to the war was successful for invading countries like Poland and France but that strategy was never going to outlast the industrial power of the UK and US.

The inherent flaw in Germany's blitzkrieg tactic was overextending the supply chain and they failed to change tactics or scale production. That's probably the number 1 reason they lost the war... In addition to Hitler becoming unhinged

Towards the end of the war German tank divisions were abandoning their tanks because they couldn't refuel or repair due to lack of supplies
Their tanks were also very complex and difficult to fix. If I read it right, U.S. had something like 10:1 Sherman Tanks to Tiger tanks
post 1610581921 07-14-2020, 01:46 PM
-
#49
  1. IAMBEE
  1. IAMBEE
  3. Join Date: Jun 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 4,123
  6. Rep Power: 56655
USA with Patton running the show. Would have dominated any military engagement.
post 1610582051 07-14-2020, 01:48 PM
-
#50
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 7,371
  6. Rep Power: 47124
Originally Posted By MassBB⏩
USA cucks in their delusional world as usual. None of you have any idea what's its like being part of a country that has had real wars and not bullied some middle Eastern **** hole and call it a war.

Learn history outside of USA to get some truth, you wouldn't have stood a chance against Germany. France and UK were just as powerful militarily as USA at the time. Germany transformed into a pure war machine.

As for saving the UK, you came last minute when the allies already had the upper hand and claimed victory, just lol, cuckery at its highest.
We've cucked you p*ssy Brits in not 1, but 2 wars. Now you're the bootlicking irrelevant semi-autistic little brother that nobody gives a f*ck about living in some outdated centuries old Monarchy... JFL.

And you realize the British are involved in the Middle-East as well? JFL

We're sorry that Europe has caused two global conflicts resulting in millions dead and we've had to come clean up the mess both times.

Now, m8... fast forward to 2020. US vs UK would be like an apache helicopter versus a water gun. That's your reality now... enjoy your battle against Islam goals of 2030.
post 1610582591 07-14-2020, 01:54 PM
-
#51
  1. janglingjack
  2. Ayy
  1. janglingjack
  2. Ayy
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 11,854
  5. Rep Power: 76539
Russia
USA
Nigeria

That's it
*eggs crew*
*raiders crew*
post 1610582611 07-14-2020, 01:54 PM
-
#52
  1. JayJ350
  1. JayJ350
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 73,290
  7. Rep Power: 273505
I think Imperial Japan vs Nazi Germany would have been an interesting showdown.
post 1610582741 07-14-2020, 01:55 PM
-
#53
  1. Sezzors
  2. Registered User
  1. Sezzors
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2014
  4. Posts: 5,126
  5. Rep Power: 9013
Germany were the strongest nation in those days and I don’t think anyone could, lol @ Muricans and the chit tier history knowledge
post 1610583241 07-14-2020, 02:01 PM
-
#54
  1. MassBB
  2. Registered User
  1. MassBB
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 127
  6. Rep Power: 307
Originally Posted By DeputyDong5⏩
We've cucked you p*ssy Brits in not 1, but 2 wars. Now you're the bootlicking irrelevant semi-autistic little brother that nobody gives a f*ck about living in some outdated centuries old Monarchy... JFL.

And you realize the British are involved in the Middle-East as well? JFL

We're sorry that Europe has caused two global conflicts resulting in millions dead and we've had to come clean up the mess both times.

Now, m8... fast forward to 2020. US vs UK would be like an apache helicopter versus a water gun. That's your reality now... enjoy your battle against Islam goals of 2030.
Another dumb twat, you didn't win, the UK left as it realised USA would eventually produce millions of cucks like yourself. It saw the other 25% of the world it ruled over as more important. Your independence was won by France, Spain, Holland etc. All UK rivals that bailed you farm boys out.

I bet you think the crusades were just like Kingdom of Heaven? Yes USA cuck, learning history from Hollywood ah?

Now cuck go and research the largest empire in the world and the go on to research which country has made the most contributory world inventions. Take note of who is at the top and how far down United cucks of America is.

Oh wait...who's language are you using? Just lol.
Gloria a Dio
post 1610583621 07-14-2020, 02:05 PM
-
#55
  1. WABeast
  2. Registered Guido
  1. WABeast
  2. Registered Guido
  3. Join Date: Nov 2016
  4. Location: Washington, USA, Chad
  5. Age: 31
  6. Posts: 9,190
  7. Rep Power: 59182
Originally Posted By DeputyDong5⏩
USA or Russia.

Definitely not the cuck British who were getting railed up the a** until we saved them.
Yep. The USA was supply weapons, ships etc. too all of the allies including russia since the war began ( before Pearl Harbor). No way Britain would have survived without America.
German technology was great, but they could not build as fast as the US.


So yeah only USA and Russia.
*Sicilian Crew*
*Super Straight Crew*
post 1610583651 07-14-2020, 02:06 PM
-
#56
  1. Quiggie
  2. Registered User
  1. Quiggie
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2016
  4. Posts: 1,530
  5. Rep Power: 7276
You guys are forgetting Germany never fought alone. Millions of Italians, Finns, Hungarians, Romanians, etc fought with them. When germany invaded the ussr, people in the baltics, ukraine, caucasus muslims etc all welcomed them as saviors from communist oppression. When germany invaded yugoslavia, half the country (basically everyone but the serbs) cheered and threw flowers at them. Same thing in Norway. It's not as if it was germany vs everybody else.

The USSR basically fought the combined armies of germany, finland, italy, hungary, romania, plus soviet traitors, and still won, and the ussr also had a hostile japan on its southern borders (manchukuo) so they were unable to send their entire army to fight the germans.
post 1610584881 07-14-2020, 02:19 PM
-
#57
  1. MisterJustice
  2. Praise The Sun
  1. MisterJustice
  2. Praise The Sun
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 6,608
  5. Rep Power: 26705



also LMAO @ miscers saying Russia
umm you do realize that Russia only survived because the supply from US right? US planes airdropped supplies until germans ran out and had to retreat
☀ Praise The Sun ☀

My new free supplement for increasing test levels
http://i.imgur.com/e0rCOjx.gif

All content generated by this account is a work of fiction and may serve only the purpose of possible entertainment value. Any resemblance to actual events or people is purely coincidental and not intentional.
post 1610585801 07-14-2020, 02:25 PM
-
#58
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 567
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By tornister⏩
nice revisionist website, look into actual sources about how germans tried to provoke war through sabotage and covert attacks by abwehra with final one that gave them casus beli:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incident

also this quote is fake

>Sources: Kuzniar
>Der Fall Gleiwitz (1961), IMDb.com; accessed 4 June 2015.
>Operacja Himmler (TV 1979), IMDb.com; accessed 4 June 2015.
>Die Blechtrommel (1979), IMDb.com; accessed 4 June 2015.
>Hitler's S.S.: Portrait in Evil (TV 1985),

Yep, not bias at all. No propaganda was used in making these films.
post 1610586511 07-14-2020, 02:32 PM
-
#59
  1. Quiggie
  2. Registered User
  1. Quiggie
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2016
  4. Posts: 1,530
  5. Rep Power: 7276
Originally Posted By MisterJustice⏩
also LMAO @ miscers saying Russia
umm you do realize that Russia only survived because the supply from US right? US planes airdropped supplies until germans ran out and had to retreat
While the lend lease program was a huge help to russia, the general consensus among historians is that the end result without it still would have been the same. Russian factories in the far east were manufacturing supplies much faster than the army could use them.
post 1610587001 07-14-2020, 02:36 PM
-
#60
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  1. MaesterSeymour
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 567
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Quiggie⏩
While the lend lease program was a huge help to russia, the general consensus among historians is that the end result without it still would have been the same. Russian factories in the far east were manufacturing supplies much faster than the army could use them.
lol no. The generals of USSR admitted that if it weren't for the Lend Lease Act then they were going to lose.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts