Then too bad its made up. its based on Daily Mail article but there was no Daily Mail printed that day.

The majority of Israelis are Sephardic or Mizrahi and do not on average have the same level IQ as Ashkenazi Jews. Just the truth.


And Im Sephardic.

USA, we would of out spent them.. Russia would of out lived them.. but overall Texas alone is about the size of Germany.. do you realize how badly USA would of raped Germany ina 1v1

You're an idiot.

A lot of this question depends on supply chains and ressources, so a lot of it actually depends on how thrid party countries act.

A Germany, that is allowed to keep trading oil from the US and other country for virtually unlimited ressources is less endangered of overextending and getting stuck in the Russian winter than it was IRL. With much more supply those suplly chains might not break and the soldiers get stuck.
Time is also a factor Germany might have timed it's Russian invasion way better. Winter 1939/1940 was actually an even colder one than 1941/1942 so if Germany went straight for Russia, they would have had to deal with even more severe circumstances. If smart they might have timed their invasion better without other forces and invaded earlier that year and mostly avoided Russian winters.
It still is a race against time, but the Red Army started out oretty incompetent.

With the US being a separate continent of approximately 28times the size of Germany a land invasion seems pretty impossible. It's just way too large and disconnected from Europe to launch a meaningful invasion.
So it basically becomes a stalemate or a race to the nuclear bomb.

Soviet Union. They did most of the killing (and dying) vs. Germany in WWII. It would have sucked even worse than it already did, but they might have defeated them on their own.

USA, nope. I mean theoretically yes but in fact probably no. Even getting a landing would have been tricky with no Eastern Front to hold up millions of German soldiers. Then they face a much larger German force. The attrition would have been absolutely brutal, ridiculously worse than against the Japanese. Stalin could absorb absurd losses because he ran a totalitarian regime. A democracy wouldn't have stood for 100s of Ks of dead US kids for the sake of a European conflict.

No-one else has a shot.

you forgot about 12 other sources that are listed there and are not some movies:

1.Gleiwitz casus belli. Google Books. 2018. "Nazi government under Hitler's leadership staged the Gleiwitz incident as a casus belli for the invasion of Poland the following morning"

2."20 Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Volume 4". Avalon Project. 20 December 1945. Retrieved 12 October 2009.

3.Christopher J. Ailsby, The Third Reich Day by Day, Zenith Imprint, 2001, ISBN 0-7603-1167-6, Google Print, p. 112

4.The World War II's first victim. A farmer was murdered as part of a Nazi plot to provide an excuse to invade Poland, the story of a man forgotten by history. By Bob Graham, 29 Aug 2009. The Telegraph.

5.James J. Wirtz, Roy Godson, Strategic Denial and Deception: The Twenty-First Century Challenge, Transaction Publishers, 2002, ISBN 0-7658-0898-6, Google Print, p.100

6."Museum in Gliwice: What happened here?". Muzeum.gliwice.pl. Archived from the original on 4 November 2006. Retrieved 8 March 2014.

7.Thomas Laqueur, 'Devoted to Terror,' in London Review of Books, Vol. 37 No. 18–24 September 2015, pp. 9–16.

8.Bradley Lightbody, The Second World War: Ambitions to Nemesis, Routledge, 2004; ISBN 0-415-22405-5, Google Print, p.39

9."20 Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Volume 2; Friday, 30 November 1945". Avalon Project. Retrieved 8 November 2012.

10."Address by Adolf Hitler". archives of the Avalon Project at the Yale Law School. 1 September 1939. Retrieved 4 June 2015.

11."Holocaust Educational Resource". Nizkor. Retrieved 8 March 2014.

12Steven J. Zaloga, Poland 1939: The Birth of Blitzkrieg, Google Print, p. 39, Osprey Publishing, 2002; ISBN 1-84176-408-6

Only USA srs

Soviet Union endured extreme casualties. If it was 1v1 it would’ve been worse and ultimately Germany would’ve won

Yea, Japan never really had a chance the way they went about it. Invading mainland China due to culture animosity and military propaganda and then trying to take out all of America’s carriers (and getting zero) in Pearl Harbor. Considering Japan itself has like no natural resources they were hosed before they really got going.

Yeah that's a fair assessment. So many variables but everything I've read on the subject and I've read plenty of WW2 books and other war books - I don't think (at the time) there was a more feared army than Germans in WW2 and they earned that reputation. They were good and so were their Generals. The whole country was very militarized and they were extremely pissed off about how they were treated after WW1 which allowed Hitler to feed off that and create basically a whole country built for war. The soldiers and even kids were so ready to kill it was ridiculous. Not to say many Germans weren't terrified of another war but many of the soldiers believed in Nazi doctrine that it was their destiny to kill and take over the world and nothing else mattered.

They lost the war mostly because they were put in an impossible situation more than anything. If Hitler had prepared them for the winter in Russia w proper equipment and tanks etc and if his generals weren't so terrified of him they may have had better plans throughout the war.

Who knows what would have happened... I think USA would definitely have held its own against Germany 1on1 but win... I don't think so...

Again, I don't think this makes any sense. Are we talking Germany before taking over Poland? Because if we are talking Germany before the war started v. USA before the war started USA would obviously destroy them. After Germany stated trying to secure all the resources and extra manpower they needed the war would never ever be 1v1. That was the whole crux for both Germany and Japan.

Dumbest thing I’ve ever heard in my life..


To answer op, none of them would have even been remotely close to besting the Nazis in any battle, at land air or sea, if the war had truly been 1v1.


Maybe the British navy could have beaten them at sea actually, but that’s a maybe..

JFL at anyone saying USA.
You couldn't even beat a bunch of jungle asians using bamboo sticks. Gtfo of here.

You cuck Canadians have such inflated perceptions of yourselves. Like literally nobody cares about your input on any topic, ever... JFL.

What was Canada's contribution again? JFL

USA, endless supply of materials and resources. Empire of production at the time.. Only thing that could have stopped a US victory in a 1v1 would be public opinion. The Wehrmacht were remarkably skilled and motivated, think I read somewhere that even at the very end of the war they exacted a 1:1 casualty rate on allied troops. That's with all German cities in ruins, supplies stretched thin, pushed on multiple fronts and without aerial control. It would have been a bloodbath.

The Russians certainly did most of the dirty work and paid an enormous price. They deserve all the credit in the world, but it would not have been possible without US supplies.

canada fought at both world wars you absolute mongoloid. And we didn’t just join at the ends either..

This

They didn't do it all by themselves, but they were the main force in defeating Germany. We were important for defeating Italy and Japan.

Contributions were minuscule at best.

Canada would have CRUSHED germany.

USA was a good army and had a great ability to mass produce but I doubt democratic America would have been able to stand for the casualties that would have been necessary to defeat dictatorship Germany 1on1 at that time. Russia had like 24 million killed during WW2 mostly fighting Germany. USA (or any country for that matter) would have had to be prepared for a similar sacrifice if it was 1on1.

Germany's military was a killing machine back then. They were obviously very evil as was Japan but putting that aside their military was arguably best in the world.

It took almost everything the world had to beat them and Japan. Largest army (Russia) best navy (Britain) and worlds biggest economic power (USA).

the country who DID beat them on one hand

the Soviet union

Which further proves my point.

Also lmao @ 11.

lmao. Tell me another joke.

now i understand why
they cant follow orders

if 1 on 1 then germany wood have creampied usa or soviet union

Oh cmon, right now you are defying actual historical facts and just repeat nazi propaganda. Do some actual research on the subject, you have Internet so its not hard

Probably only the USA.

And you're just repeating propaganda as well.

Based on what? USA could barely handle the pacific theatre... lmao

You need to be doing some srs patriotic mental gymnastics to think any of the allied countries alone could have taken Germany during either of the world wars.