"You're a racist and you denying you're a racist makes you a racist." "White fragility exists because when I say white fragility exists people disagree with me which proves white fragility exists" - Robin Dialgelo / You

I'm going to make a book called "Women are useless" or "Black people are inferior" and then when women or black people refuse to read it I'm going to use that as proof that those statements are true because I'm an intellectual just like you. I don't have to provide any proof of those ridiculous claims, I can just accuse you of them and then say if you deny them then that's just proof that they are true.

Why is it that when I accuse nosotros bolillos of possessing racial fragility, you cant just say "No, we dont" - how come you have to accuse unnamed "constantly screeching" other races of being fragile instead? Why, when I call out my fellow whites, do you feel a strong need to call out non-whites?

Misc is so obsessed with black people.

It’s the way of the rhythmless.

That's not entirely accurate.
She is using circular logic, so her statements make from a logical standpoint, but don't have that much content.

A more accurate example would be:
Book title: "Black people are always angry"
Black people get angry at book
"Look they are angry!"

The problem seems less, that her claims are riddiculous, it's more that they are really broad. The term white fragility includes a lot of different behaviours and reactions, which totally exist, but could be more accurately summed up under multiple totally unrelated buzzwords.

You need to use your ebt card to buy some new material shweezy.

This is sad.

The problem with modern liberals is theyONLYaddress racism when they can blame it on white people.

I wouldn't know. I have zero interest in reading or hearing about it. Probably written by a self loathing sjw. But thanks for the summary *******.

a book written about how white ppl are badd, written by a non white person. imagine my shock

I think one of the reason leftists are so retarded is because they read any random book by some idiot and then internalize everything in it as fact.

I always tread lightly into these threads, because something about them tends to feel so "charged".

And I suppose that the reason for it is likely because there's a whole lot of "if you do X, you might be Z" type statements that get thrown around by the woke left. So it's understandable when the knee-jerk to being told that you may have some sort of prejudice is to recoil and say "Of course I don't" and, to perhaps, be insulted. After all, it certainly comes off as a character assessment to be told that you may very well be prejudiced without realizing it. It's being told that (a) you're ignorant, willfully or otherwise, and (b) if you don't realize it, it is because you weren't smart enough to see it, then finally (c) if you walk away from the dialogue now, you're irredeemably racist. That's a very hard, and uncomfortable proposition to grasp. You're also expecting another person to conform to your immediate beliefs in real-time... But that's not how you bridge a gap.

I don't think that starting a conversation with an accusation has ever, in the history, of humankind, been productive in a positive way. Especially not when that accusation is tagged with the additional statement: "And if you don't have this conversation right now, you are choosing the wrong side."

Of course there is cause for concern when somebody calls you a "racist"; and if you're upset at being called racist, well, good. That's a sign that you don'twantto be racist, and most peopledon't want to be. It's not "White Fragility" as much as it is the knee jerk reaction to being told you're doing something wrong even when you're not actively, intentionally, or otherwise racist by the classical sense of the word.

We do have to recognize that we all have some sort of internal bias, and often that bias directs us toward people that are similar to us. You can see it in many different aspects of life, but the reason we do this is to protect ourselves from what feels like could be a painful rejection from another group that considers us different. When people come to America from other countries, often, they seek communities in which there are others like them. In this way, they do not have to step too far beyond their comfort zone (in an already stressful situation) while rebuilding their lives outside of their home country. I don't think this is racism, though, as much as it is remaining in one's own comfort zone.

But that being said, we also cannot deny that some form of racism exists, it definitely does. I've certainly heard people say things I consider racist, especially behind closed doors. Some things I've heard are from people I wouldn't have expected it from. I think, what makes me most concerned is that there is this sort of unspoken "it's okay to say this to you because you're also white, so you'll probably understand, and nobody is around" thing that happens every now and then. That definitely exists, and if you haven't experienced it, I suppose that you're fortunate because it's always incredibly awkward. Truthfully, this is not something that occurs often, but when it does happen, it's always surprising. But that also isn't to say that it's limited only to white people.

Anyway, this is a wordy post, like always. Hard to start my thoughts without elaborating on them, especially when it comes to something like this.

To cut to the chase; if there's a dialogue to be had about what could be done for everybody to see each other eye-to-eye, that'd be fantastic.But it doesn't, and shouldn't start, with either side flinging an insult or a character assessment at the other.

What the fukk is white fragility?

Edit: I looked it up

noun
the tendency among members of the dominant white cultural group to have a defensive, wounded, angry, or dismissive response to evidence of racism.

L M A O

What the fukk is white fragility?

Edit: I looked it up

noun
the tendency among members of the dominant white cultural group to have a defensive, wounded, angry, or dismissive response to evidence of racism.

L M A O

lmao

'dominant white cultural group'

does this apply to the world or just the west?

I mean, white people arn't dominant in China are they?

I’m at least 3 tax brackets above you. Maybe more.

Does anybody else see the absolute irony in this thread??

no problem, *******, its an accurate summary

the book is stupid but the author is also most definitely white.

I wouldn't know. I have zero interest in reading or hearing about it. Probably written by a self loathing sjw. But thanks for the summary *******.

I always tread lightly into these threads, because something about them tends to feel so "charged".

And I suppose that the reason for it is likely because there's a whole lot of "if you do X, you might be Z" type statements that get thrown around by the woke left. So it's understandable when the knee-jerk to being told that you may have some sort of prejudice is to recoil and say "Of course I don't" and, to perhaps, be insulted. After all, it certainly comes off as a character assessment to be told that you may very well be prejudiced without realizing it. It's being told that (a) you're ignorant, willfully or otherwise, and (b) if you don't realize it, it is because you weren't smart enough to see it, then finally (c) if you walk away from the dialogue now, you're irredeemably racist. That's a very hard, and uncomfortable proposition to grasp. You're also expecting another person to conform to your immediate beliefs in real-time... But that's not how you bridge a gap.

I don't think that starting a conversation with an accusation has ever, in the history, of humankind, been productive in a positive way. Especially not when that accusation is tagged with the additional statement: "And if you don't have this conversation right now, you are choosing the wrong side."

Of course there is cause for concern when somebody calls you a "racist"; and if you're upset at being called racist, well, good. That's a sign that you don'twantto be racist, and most peopledon't want to be. It's not "White Fragility" as much as it is the knee jerk reaction to being told you're doing something wrong even when you're not actively, intentionally, or otherwise racist by the classical sense of the word.

We do have to recognize that we all have some sort of internal bias, and often that bias directs us toward people that are similar to us. You can see it in many different aspects of life, but the reason we do this is to protect ourselves from what feels like could be a painful rejection from another group that considers us different. When people come to America from other countries, often, they seek communities in which there are others like them. In this way, they do not have to step too far beyond their comfort zone (in an already stressful situation) while rebuilding their lives outside of their home country. I don't think this is racism, though, as much as it is remaining in one's own comfort zone.

But that being said, we also cannot deny that some form of racism exists, it definitely does. I've certainly heard people say things I consider racist, especially behind closed doors. Some things I've heard are from people I wouldn't have expected it from. I think, what makes me most concerned is that there is this sort of unspoken "it's okay to say this to you because you're also white, so you'll probably understand, and nobody is around" thing that happens every now and then. That definitely exists, and if you haven't experienced it, I suppose that you're fortunate because it's always incredibly awkward. Truthfully, this is not something that occurs often, but when it does happen, it's always surprising. But that also isn't to say that it's limited only to white people.

Anyway, this is a wordy post, like always. Hard to start my thoughts without elaborating on them, especially when it comes to something like this.

To cut to the chase; if there's a dialogue to be had about what could be done for everybody to see each other eye-to-eye, that'd be fantastic.But it doesn't, and shouldn't start, with either side flinging an insult or a character assessment at the other.

That is a better example. She's accusing people of being fragile and defensive when met with a serious accusation and then using that defensiveness to prove her accusation instead of actual evidence.

It's like how in the book she changes the definition of racism so that only white people can be called racist. This is clearly not true but if you say that then that's somehow proof that you are racist.

Her claims are broad (aka ironically racist) but also ridiculous, at least most of them are. She ruins any good points with countless garbage. Like her Jackie Robinson "example" where she makes a completely untrue statement and uses that as proof of her crackpot point. No one thought he was the first black player good enough to make it, everyone knew he was the first one allowed and there were many good black players that deserved to be in the MLB and many bad white players in the MLB that didn't deserve to be there.

She's a typical "woke" leftist marxist and has somehow made a lot of money by going around to corporations and just accusing all non-black people of being racist and all black people of being group think children that need to be coddled and protected. 1 thing she was absolutely right about is that some of the most racist people are "woke" leftist white liberals aka her and her ilk.

Maybe you should read it

The problem with modern liberals is theyONLYaddress racism when they can blame it on white people. That's the only type of racism that exists to them. Nothing is going to ever change if both sides only want the other side to change. Conservatives want liberals to stop doing this and that, liberals want conservatives to stop doing this and that but WHITE FUKKING LIBERALS.....they are here sayingblack people can do this but people cant do exactly the same thing

-Black face vs white face (Black face is terrible but no one ever said anything about the Wayans Bros inWhite Chicks)
-N-word (if it's so bad when a white person says it, then no one should ever say it. but hypocrisy prevails)
-Dredlocks
-Rap music (Not a major issue now but i was told in high school that I shouldnt listen to rap music and have a loud system in my truck because i'm white)
-Shouldnt wear certain shoes (played Bball in middle school and had a really nice pair of Nikes and was told i didnt deserve them because i was white and they were gonna steal them)

And the list can probably go one and on. If we GENUINELY want change, then views have to be held consistent across the board. If you hate trump because of his epstein connection, then you better not vote for biden. If you claim to hate racism, dont just shrug and say "now you know how it feels" when a white person says they experienced racism. If you TRULY hate how come cops take it too far and kill civilians, then speak up for all the civilians killed. I cant be the only one who wants change

Ultimately, i feel like the MSM is primarily to blame. They, of course, have their agenda to push. but they are gatekeepers of knowledge and unfortunately, people still trust them. CNN settled out of court with Nick Sandman and others. Not to mention they threatened to doxx and sue a 16 year old for a meme he made. ABS and NBC st on the Epstein and Weinstein story because it would have hurt Democrat images at the time. I dont know of any fox news issues like these but there is an easily accessible list of their controversies.

Can confirm. Shaun King gets paid a lot on his gofundme’s for dead black people.