Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » America’s Doctor says Hydroxychloroquine is effective for Covid-19
  1. Results 61 to 80 of 80
  2. Page 3 of 3
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3

Thread: America’s Doctor says Hydroxychloroquine is effective for Covid-19

post 1611907781 07-28-2020, 01:35 PM
-
#61
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 49,580
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By F.Liu⏩
Lol @ all the libtard cucks ITT attacking the doctor's character and not looking at the studies.

Here's a more authoritative source for you, Yale MD, PhD, professor of epidemiology with 40,000 citations:https://www.newsweek.com/key-defeati...pinion-1519535

His two papers can be found with a simple google search, or duckduckgo when google censors him.

At this point, it's clear that the dems and big tech need the pandemic to continue to get Trump out, and big pharma needs the pandemic to continue for the $$$$$. If history is just, they will be held accountable for the millions of deaths and destruction of people's livelihoods, fueled by Trump Derangement Syndrome.
any link to the papers? I searched on google, got a link to the Yale site, and here’s what it shows

https://medicine.yale.edu/news-article/25085/
Dallas Cowboys

Lifted for 30 years

Ass > tits
No Debt Crew
post 1611908091 07-28-2020, 01:37 PM
-
#62
  1. TheIronAsylum
  2. Registered User
  1. TheIronAsylum
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 15,935
  5. Rep Power: 89558
wont see anything bout it though because the DEMO CULT wont allow it and will filter it out due to their mind control media monopoly
post 1611908281 07-28-2020, 01:38 PM
-
#63
  1. F.Liu
  2. Registered User
  1. F.Liu
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Edmonton, Canada
  5. Age: 33
  6. Posts: 2,206
  7. Rep Power: 4229
Originally Posted By 5x10⏩
any link to the papers? I searched on google, got a link to the Yale site, and here’s what it shows

https://medicine.yale.edu/news-article/25085/
First paper, May 27, 2020:https://academic.oup.com/aje/article...waa093/5847586
Second paper, July 20, 2020, which is a response to a response to his original paper:https://academic.oup.com/aje/article...waa152/5873640

Click on PDF button to download.
post 1611908701 07-28-2020, 01:43 PM
-
#64
  1. redraider86
  2. Christina Hansen
  1. redraider86
  2. Christina Hansen
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Posts: 20,627
  5. Rep Power: 2064840
Originally Posted By bloodcel⏩
Your OG account is unbanned. Can you post on that, please?
Train hard, train smart, have fun!

"I'm not autistic- I'm ARTISTIC." - etet1919
post 1611908881 07-28-2020, 01:45 PM
-
#65
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By redraider86⏩
Your OG account is unbanned. Can you post on that, please?
post 1611909241 07-28-2020, 01:48 PM
-
#66
  1. digital022
  2. Registered User
  1. digital022
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 8,026
  6. Rep Power: 42447
Originally Posted By F.Liu⏩
Lol @ all the libtard cucks ITT attacking the doctor's character and not looking at the studies.
The studies are chit as has been mentioned by a misc doctor working on covid cases.
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
lol
Your schtick sucks and it screams insecurity.
post 1611909461 07-28-2020, 01:50 PM
-
#67
  1. F.Liu
  2. Registered User
  1. F.Liu
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Edmonton, Canada
  5. Age: 33
  6. Posts: 2,206
  7. Rep Power: 4229
Originally Posted By bloodcel⏩
Neither of those papers are the original research. If you read what he says about the original research, he mentions the trials were controlled but not randomized. I'll remind you that nonrandom trials are subjectn to bias and manipulation. The author also has a conflict of interest, which he explicitly reports in his paper.
If you've spent even a single minute of your life in academia, you will know that any distinguished professor with 30 years of experience has worked with dozens, maybe hundreds of companies. Second, he has also disclosed that he no longer works for those companies, so the disclosure was basically a formality and to protect him from brainlets like you who would dig up a single connection from years ago and accuse him of profiteering. Third, he clearly states he has no associations with those companies anymore.

Lastly, HCQ is cheap as ****. The profit is in the vaccines, not HCQ. India has even been giving out HCQ for free.

Do people still reply to reds or just ignore? Haven't posted on misc for a while lmao.
post 1611909761 07-28-2020, 01:53 PM
-
#68
  1. Lefticle
  2. Registered User
  1. Lefticle
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Height: 6'1"
  5. Weight: 225 lbs
  6. Posts: 29,450
  7. Subscribers: 1
  8. Rep Power: 572257
Originally Posted By FoxMcCocks⏩
It’s not racist, you’re just retarded
Always Neg Back Crew.
post 1611910021 07-28-2020, 01:55 PM
-
#69
  1. JudgeRuby
  2. Registered User
  1. JudgeRuby
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 259
  6. Rep Power: 190
it hasn't even been 6mos, it would be crazy research were unanimous.

a lot of researchers have ****ty methodology.
post 1611910391 07-28-2020, 01:58 PM
-
#70
  1. JudgeRuby
  2. Registered User
  1. JudgeRuby
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 259
  6. Rep Power: 190
Originally Posted By F.Liu⏩
Lol @ all the libtard cucks ITT attacking the doctor's character and not looking at the studies.

Here's a more authoritative source for you, Yale MD, PhD, professor of epidemiology with 40,000 citation

His two papers can be found with a simple google search, or duckduckgo when google censors him.

At this point, it's clear that the dems and big tech need the pandemic to continue to get Trump out, and big pharma needs the pandemic to continue for the $$$$$. If history is just, they will be held accountable for the millions of deaths and destruction of people's livelihoods, fueled by Trump Derangement Syndrome.
yup, hate it when people just attack the Author instead of the actual research. If the research is bogus then you should be able to demonstrate that.
But that is their strategy, if they don't agree wit you, they just shout you down with "racist", "sexist", "transphobic"
post 1611910551 07-28-2020, 01:59 PM
-
#71
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By F.Liu⏩
If you've spent even a single minute of your life in academia, you will know that any distinguished professor with 30 years of experience has worked with dozens, maybe hundreds of companies. Second, he has also disclosed that he no longer works for those companies, so the disclosure was basically a formality and to protect him from brainlets like you who would dig up a single connection from years ago and accuse him of profiteering. Third, he clearly states he has no associations with those companies anymore.

Lastly, HCQ is cheap as ****. The profit is in the vaccines, not HCQ. India has even been giving out HCQ for free.

Do people still reply to reds or just ignore? Haven't posted on misc for a while lmao.
It's still a conflict. And furthermore, he did not produce any randomized controlled trials to support his conclusions. The 2 trials he reported were not randomized. It is very important to randomize a trial because otherwise there can be selection bias and confounding to disrupt the study's results.

What you have to do is show randomized controlled trials that show the drug works, and ultimately, they need to be better prepared and more credible somehow than the ones where the drug didn't work. When the evidence for the efficacy outweighs the lack of evidence, people will adopt the drug.
post 1611910701 07-28-2020, 02:01 PM
-
#72
  1. hoganrulz
  2. mreatassbtchslapr
  1. hoganrulz
  2. mreatassbtchslapr
  3. Join Date: Feb 2007
  4. Posts: 47,761
  5. Rep Power: 284006
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
It's still a conflict. And furthermore, he did not produce any randomized controlled trials to support his conclusions. The 2 trials he reported were not randomized. It is very important to randomize a trial because otherwise there can be selection bias and confounding to disrupt the study's results.
Wincel is back? What did I miss?
Formerly HandBrah, LipBrah & FootBrah
they call me Don Taters
NYM
<3 Miami Dolphins
WE GONNA WIN THE FUKING SUPERBOWL SOON BAYBEH
Hala Madrid
££££££sports betting crew££££££
This is all OJ's fault
Ass cheeks are the titties of the ass
First I romance the pie maker, then I romance the pie
post 1611910901 07-28-2020, 02:03 PM
-
#73
  1. drLihp
  2. Registered User
  1. drLihp
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2014
  4. Age: 34
  5. Posts: 4,746
  6. Rep Power: 13729
this is the medical authority trumpers believe in lol

post 1611910991 07-28-2020, 02:04 PM
-
#74
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By JudgeRuby⏩
yup, hate it when people just attack the Author instead of the actual research. If the research is bogus then you should be able to demonstrate that.
But that is their strategy, if they don't agree wit you, they just shout you down with "racist", "sexist", "transphobic"
I'm not. I also addressed his actual paper. If you saw my criticism, it's that he used 2 trials as evidence for his claim. Neither trial was randomized. A nonrandom trial can be biased to produce a desired result.
post 1611911701 07-28-2020, 02:11 PM
-
#75
  1. F.Liu
  2. Registered User
  1. F.Liu
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Edmonton, Canada
  5. Age: 33
  6. Posts: 2,206
  7. Rep Power: 4229
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
It's still a conflict. And furthermore, he did not produce any randomized controlled trials to support his conclusions. The 2 trials he reported were not randomized. It is very important to randomize a trial because otherwise there can be selection bias and confounding to disrupt the study's results.

What you have to do is show randomized controlled trials that show the drug works, and ultimately, they need to be better prepared and more credible somehow than the ones where the drug didn't work. When the evidence for the efficacy outweighs the lack of evidence, people will adopt the drug.
The positive results from the studies cited by Risch were indeed not randomized, but who are you, or Google/Youtube/Twitter to say that everything HCQ related needs to be censored? Shutting down all conversation on HCQ is blatantly criminal when it is a potential lifesaver--why not have an actual conversation? The current justification is "dangerous side effects". FDA pulled their support for HCQ in mid-june, citing cardiac arrhythmia. This part has proven to not occur at rates higher than the normal population, so what the ****?

All I'm seeing is political BS, and certain groups needing more covid deaths to fit their orange man bad narrative. Meanwhile, look at the dosages on early HCQ trials--you can't use a 2000 mg dose and then say all HCQ doesn't work, when the recent studies have been in the 400-800 range.
post 1611915551 07-28-2020, 02:51 PM
-
#76
  1. Land Shark
  2. Eggplant Wizard
  1. Land Shark
  2. Eggplant Wizard
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Location: Riverhead, New York, United States
  5. Posts: 4,500
  6. Rep Power: 14683
Don’t like politics or the media at all. I don’t support the left or right. The affects of HCQ aside, I watched the video of America’s Frontline Doctors outside press conference and it was some of the most obviously fake, terrible acting I’ve ever seen
LA Kings/NY Islanders/Boston Red Sox
★Beverly Brothers Crew★
☆Dino Bravo Crew☆
♡Francine the Queen of Extreme Crew♡
★Terri Power/Tori Crew★
★Akeem the African Dream Crew★
☆Fabulous Rougeau Brothers Crew☆
post 1611916151 07-28-2020, 02:58 PM
-
#77
  1. drLihp
  2. Registered User
  1. drLihp
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2014
  4. Age: 34
  5. Posts: 4,746
  6. Rep Power: 13729
Originally Posted By Land
Don’t like politics or the media at all. I don’t support the left or right. The affects of HCQ aside, I watched the video of America’s Frontline Doctors outside press conference and it was some of the most obviously fake, terrible acting I’ve ever seen
you mean you dont trust a Dr that believes in alien DNA and demons?
post 1611917331 07-28-2020, 03:09 PM
-
#78
  1. poundXpound
  2. Registered User
  1. poundXpound
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 3,673
  6. Rep Power: 55628
Originally Posted By beansieweansie⏩
so if i wanted to avoid being a lizard, which treatment option do i take?

Covid prevention.JPG
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. And that's why the USA is a constitutional republic and not a democracy.
post 1611917641 07-28-2020, 03:14 PM
-
#79
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By F.Liu⏩
The positive results from the studies cited by Risch were indeed not randomized
k so do a randomized trial and then see what it shows...

if it works, then u can claim hcq works
post 1611918351 07-28-2020, 03:24 PM
-
#80
  1. F.Liu
  2. Registered User
  1. F.Liu
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Edmonton, Canada
  5. Age: 33
  6. Posts: 2,206
  7. Rep Power: 4229
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
k so do a randomized trial and then see what it shows...

if it works, then u can claim hcq works
Are you not following the news? Did you read the article by Dr. Risch?

The HCQ issue has become so politicized that doctors' careers are in danger for trying it. Licensed MD's are being censored from all big tech platforms by essentially braindead journalists if they publish any positive evidence.

I want to see the randomized trial results with the dosages Dr. Risch mentioned in his studies, and would gladly admit I'm wrong if the results came back negative. But there is literally no way to do that in this political environment.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts