Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Castle Bravo - biggest nuke ever detonated by US
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 43
  2. Page 1 of 2
  3. 1
  4. 2
  6. Last

Thread: Castle Bravo - biggest nuke ever detonated by US

post 1612277201 08-01-2020, 11:23 AM
-
#1
  1. exxtracool
  2. Registered User
  1. exxtracool
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2018
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 20,766
  7. Rep Power: 77972

Castle Bravo - biggest nuke ever detonated by US

When Bravo was detonated,within one second it formed a fireball almost 4.5 miles (7.2 km) across. This fireball was visible on Kwajalein Atoll over 250 miles (400 km) away. The explosion left a crater 6,500 feet (2,000 m) in diameter and 250 feet (76 m) in depth.


yield was 15MT so 15 million tons of tnt, to put that into perspective the nuke dropped on hiroshima was 15KT or 15 THOUSAND tons of tnt... and the Mother of All Bombs dropped a few years ago had a yield of just 11 tons.















this is the crater it left behind






this is what would happen if you detonated it over NYC

everything in the RED is completely destroyed. in the first grey most residential and commercial buildings collapse. biggest circle is third degree burns.


post 1612277531 08-01-2020, 11:27 AM
-
#2
  1. MisterJustice
  2. Praise The Sun
  1. MisterJustice
  2. Praise The Sun
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 6,608
  5. Rep Power: 26705
Great movie about nukes, have re-watched it like 5+ times

Trinity and Beyond - 70th Anniversary(the 70th anniversary one is a longer version with some extra scenes)

https://www.reelhouse.org/atomcentra...th-anniversary
☀ Praise The Sun ☀

My new free supplement for increasing test levels
http://i.imgur.com/e0rCOjx.gif

All content generated by this account is a work of fiction and may serve only the purpose of possible entertainment value. Any resemblance to actual events or people is purely coincidental and not intentional.
post 1612277641 08-01-2020, 11:28 AM
-
#3
  1. climberbrah
  2. Banned
  1. climberbrah
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Posts: 5,282
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By exxtracool⏩
When Bravo was detonated,within one second it formed a fireball almost 4.5 miles (7.2 km) across. This fireball was visible on Kwajalein Atoll over 250 miles (400 km) away. The explosion left a crater 6,500 feet (2,000 m) in diameter and 250 feet (76 m) in depth.


yield was 15MT so 15 million tons of tnt, to put that into perspective the nuke dropped on hiroshima was 15KT or 15 THOUSAND tons of tnt... and the Mother of All Bombs dropped a few years ago had a yield of just 11 tons.















this is the crater it left behind






this is what would happen if you detonated it over NYC

everything in the RED is completely destroyed. in the first grey most residential and commercial buildings collapse. biggest circle is third degree burns.


should have dropped one of these on hanoi in vietnam war and told those boyos to surrender. LBJ was a huge *******
post 1612278041 08-01-2020, 11:32 AM
-
#4
  1. keyboardworkout
  2. ChatGPT4.5 Bot
  1. keyboardworkout
  2. ChatGPT4.5 Bot
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Posts: 36,953
  5. Rep Power: 416934
Just LOL if you don't carry a Davy Crocket (M-29/M-388) in the trunk of your car.
▪█─────█▪ Equipment Crew #53 ▪█─────█▪
^^^^^^^ 6' 6" and Over Crew ^^^^^^^
------------- No Vax Crew ----------------
post 1612278291 08-01-2020, 11:36 AM
-
#5
  1. tunafishha
  2. Registered CCP
  1. tunafishha
  2. Registered CCP
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 29,114
  5. Rep Power: 27114
First, the American'ts steal land and resources to create weapons like the Nuke(because they can't fight for chit) and then they boast about Aircraft carriers, lmao. The funny thing is, even with all these weapons from stolen resources, they still can't beat the Chinese, which conjured up their huge army the legit way(no stealing resources)

US's history is absolutely fkd. I would hate to be born white American. Their stock keeps plummeting.
*Catholic Crew*
*Community College Master Race*
*5'5 Masterrace*
*Starbucks Crew*
*Buy high, sell low*
post 1612278441 08-01-2020, 11:38 AM
-
#6
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Check out tsar bomba.

chit is epic
post 1612278521 08-01-2020, 11:38 AM
-
#7
  1. Getter_done
  1. Getter_done
  3. Join Date: Dec 2008
  4. Posts: 138,168
  5. Subscribers: 6
  6. Rep Power: 1140615
Nuclear bombs arent real, theyre just made up to make the masses scared and under control, all those videos arent real its just a lot of tnt with clever filmography.
post 1612278811 08-01-2020, 11:42 AM
-
#8
  1. MrDevereaux
  2. Registered User
  1. MrDevereaux
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 5,480
  5. Rep Power: 26857
Lol they also completely miscalculated the yield. Was supposed to be about half as powerful. Done fukked up.
post 1612279211 08-01-2020, 11:47 AM
-
#9
  1. climberbrah
  2. Banned
  1. climberbrah
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Posts: 5,282
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By tunafishha⏩
First, the American'ts steal land and resources to create weapons like the Nuke(because they can't fight for chit) and then they boast about Aircraft carriers, lmao. The funny thing is, even with all these weapons from stolen resources, they still can't beat the Chinese, which conjured up their huge army the legit way(no stealing resources)

US's history is absolutely fkd. I would hate to be born white American. Their stock keeps plummeting.
China hasn't won a military battle in over 40 years boyo.

even in the korean war, you need like a 20 to 1 ratio to fight the americans - and your casualties were through the roof. The offensive got put to a halt by a couple thousand Americans.

Also, the US is pretty self sufficient in oil production now where as China needs to suck off middle east/russia for oil (what a bunch of *******s).
post 1612279711 08-01-2020, 11:54 AM
-
#10
  1. tunafishha
  2. Registered CCP
  1. tunafishha
  2. Registered CCP
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 29,114
  5. Rep Power: 27114
Originally Posted By climberbrah⏩
China hasn't won a military battle in over 40 years boyo.

even in the korean war, you need like a 20 to 1 ratio to fight the americans - and your casualties were through the roof. The offensive got put to a halt by a couple thousand Americans.

Also, the US is pretty self sufficient in oil production now where as China needs to suck off middle east/russia for oil (what a bunch of *******s).
China hasn't fought because they didn't need to. They have a good track record in human history. No stealing, no conquering, bb. And yet look at us, one of the most powerful military in existence(if not the most powerful).

American'ts, on the other hand - steal land, lie, cheat, butt into other nation's business, kill generals because muh civilians lives are too invaluable. FKN lol at the Korean war. Just imagine Koreans having a civil war and then some weirdo white American't dude just butts in. Like fk outta here dude.

Oh and your delusional if you think we had higher casualties. The only time the Asians had a high lost of casualty was when the nuke was dropped, which of course was a war crime(no one at that time even thought about using nukes as a weapon), after the first crime(stealing land and resources). That is exactly why im kicking all the American't bases out of the East once I rise to power. Yall dun goofed too many times.
*Catholic Crew*
*Community College Master Race*
*5'5 Masterrace*
*Starbucks Crew*
*Buy high, sell low*
post 1612280631 08-01-2020, 12:06 PM
-
#11
  1. climberbrah
  2. Banned
  1. climberbrah
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Posts: 5,282
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By tunafishha⏩
Oh and your delusional if you think we had higher casualties.
U wot m8?
Originally Posted By tunafishha⏩
Just imagine Koreans having a civil war and then some weirdo white American't dude just butts in.
Just imagine Koreans have a civil war and then some weirdo yellow chinese dude just butts in
post 1612281031 08-01-2020, 12:11 PM
-
#12
  1. tunafishha
  2. Registered CCP
  1. tunafishha
  2. Registered CCP
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 29,114
  5. Rep Power: 27114
Originally Posted By climberbrah⏩
Just imagine Koreans have a civil war and then some weirdo yellow chinese dude just butts in
lmao. Koreans are Chinese people, dummy!
*Catholic Crew*
*Community College Master Race*
*5'5 Masterrace*
*Starbucks Crew*
*Buy high, sell low*
post 1612281101 08-01-2020, 12:12 PM
-
#13
  1. Niveaus
  2. Banned
  1. Niveaus
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 11
  6. Rep Power: 0
Honestly Trump should run on the #NukeNewYork platform, something I think we can ALL get behind (even most New Yorkers)
post 1612281431 08-01-2020, 12:16 PM
-
#14
  1. soaponarope1
  2. 6'2" 227
  1. soaponarope1
  2. 6'2" 227
  3. Join Date: Jun 2016
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Age: 40
  6. Posts: 13,552
  7. Rep Power: 63078
Originally Posted By tunafishha⏩
First, the American'ts steal land and resources to create weapons like the Nuke(because they can't fight for chit) and then they boast about Aircraft carriers, lmao. The funny thing is, even with all these weapons from stolen resources, they still can't beat the Chinese, which conjured up their huge army the legit way(no stealing resources)

US's history is absolutely fkd. I would hate to be born white American. Their stock keeps plummeting.
It's only stealing if someone stops you. If they don't/can't, it's called taking, which is what you do if you want something - take it.

Not our fault some peoples ancestors couldn't stop us.
post 1612281621 08-01-2020, 12:18 PM
-
#15
  1. Black03mach
  2. Roll Tide
  1. Black03mach
  2. Roll Tide
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Posts: 1,889
  5. Rep Power: 15100
Originally Posted By tunafishha⏩
China hasn't fought because they didn't need to. They have a good track record in human history. No stealing, no conquering, bb. And yet look at us, one of the most powerful military in existence(if not the most powerful).

American'ts, on the other hand - steal land, lie, cheat, butt into other nation's business, kill generals because muh civilians lives are too invaluable. FKN lol at the Korean war. Just imagine Koreans having a civil war and then some weirdo white American't dude just butts in. Like fk outta here dude.

Oh and your delusional if you think we had higher casualties. The only time the Asians had a high lost of casualty was when the nuke was dropped, which of course was a war crime(no one at that time even thought about using nukes as a weapon), after the first crime(stealing land and resources). That is exactly why im kicking all the American't bases out of the East once I rise to power. Yall dun goofed too many times.
I dont even know what would be Chinese strategy in all out war with America - they could never even make landfall in the US. According to google, Chinese decent is 1.5% of overall US population so an uprising here would not be successful.

Let me know how China could achieve total victory.
Software Eng Crew
Alabama Crimson Tide
*** Alabama 205 Crew ***
*** New Jersey 732 Crew ***
*** MWC ***
PRs : S: 455 / D: 545 / B: 340
CTS-V - Built motor, BTR stg2 cam, ported heads, Magnuson 2650, 85mm upper, 9.45 lower, 30gph meth
C6 Z06 - Heads ; Pfadt & Akrapovič full exhaust ; LG G2 coilovers & swaybars, corner balanced. Other misc HPDE minded mods ; 490/450 on mustang dyno.

Past Vehicles: Bolt on Focus RS ; Built/Turbo 03 Mach 1 ; ATS-V manual sedan
post 1612282191 08-01-2020, 12:23 PM
-
#16
  1. bfdehewdbyywhn
  2. Registered User
  1. bfdehewdbyywhn
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 47,380
  6. Rep Power: 103861
wish I was there to see it
HTC is too skinny for me. Fat Girls only crew. serious
Chubby Chaser and Fat Girls Only crew Founder
post 1612283191 08-01-2020, 12:33 PM
-
#17
  1. tunafishha
  2. Registered CCP
  1. tunafishha
  2. Registered CCP
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 29,114
  5. Rep Power: 27114
Originally Posted By soaponarope1⏩
It's only stealing if someone stops you. If they don't/can't, it's called taking, which is what you do if you want something - take it.

Not our fault some peoples ancestors couldn't stop us.
Ok if I waltz into best buy and take bunch of chit and no one stops me. Youre a cuck, you kno that?
Originally Posted By Black03mach⏩
I dont even know what would be Chinese strategy in all out war with America - they could never even make landfall in the US. According to google, Chinese decent is 1.5% of overall US population so an uprising here would not be successful.

Let me know how China could achieve total victory.
The only way for China to make it to American soils would take the effort of all the other nations. However, if its naval warfare, the US would get wiped out because China builds subs, not Aircraft carriers.

The US really has no allies. The united nations will be dismantled once I rise to power because I will expose the American'ts for what they are - a land of thieves.
*Catholic Crew*
*Community College Master Race*
*5'5 Masterrace*
*Starbucks Crew*
*Buy high, sell low*
post 1612283201 08-01-2020, 12:33 PM
-
#18
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Black03mach⏩
I dont even know what would be Chinese strategy in all out war with America - they could never even make landfall in the US. According to google, Chinese decent is 1.5% of overall US population so an uprising here would not be successful.

Let me know how China could achieve total victory.
Theoretically, if China aggressively first strike nuked like 10 of our important cities/naval bases and had the ability to intercept and destroy most of our counterattack nukes, we'd be forced to surrender immiediately

that's why it is important we also keep up with chinese tech and prevent any totally safe first strike capability...sadly this dooms us to be in an arms race if we don't get a treaty, and that makes us all worse off

china, in its own interests, has appropriately vowed never to first strike anyone...the us made no such vow because if we did, we could theoretically be fuked in a conventional war. But conditions are changing to where the US may need to take a no first strike policy. An ideal situation would be everyone taking no first strike and disarming, retaining only core strategic arsenal for deterrence and a halt on further research on new weapons to slow the arms race.
post 1612283901 08-01-2020, 12:41 PM
-
#19
  1. Black03mach
  2. Roll Tide
  1. Black03mach
  2. Roll Tide
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Posts: 1,889
  5. Rep Power: 15100
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
Theoretically, if China aggressively first strike nuked like 10 of our important cities/naval bases and had the ability to intercept and destroy most of our counterattack nukes, we'd be forced to surrender immiediately

that's why it is important we also keep up with chinese tech and prevent any totally safe first strike capability...sadly this dooms us to be in an arms race if we don't get a treaty, and that makes us all worse off

china, in its own interests, has appropriately vowed never to first strike anyone...the us made no such vow because if we did, we could theoretically be fuked in a conventional war. But conditions are changing to where the US may need to take a no first strike policy. An ideal situation would be everyone taking no first strike and disarming.
There is very little possibility of a Chinese warhead detonating on US soil. There would have to be some sort of unknown technology that would be able to beat the weapon systems designed to intercept the missiles. In that case, this argument works for both sides considering the US could have big swinging dik defense that we dont know about.
Software Eng Crew
Alabama Crimson Tide
*** Alabama 205 Crew ***
*** New Jersey 732 Crew ***
*** MWC ***
PRs : S: 455 / D: 545 / B: 340
CTS-V - Built motor, BTR stg2 cam, ported heads, Magnuson 2650, 85mm upper, 9.45 lower, 30gph meth
C6 Z06 - Heads ; Pfadt & Akrapovič full exhaust ; LG G2 coilovers & swaybars, corner balanced. Other misc HPDE minded mods ; 490/450 on mustang dyno.

Past Vehicles: Bolt on Focus RS ; Built/Turbo 03 Mach 1 ; ATS-V manual sedan
post 1612284221 08-01-2020, 12:44 PM
-
#20
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Black03mach⏩
There is very little possibility of a Chinese warhead detonating on US soil. There would have to be some sort of unknown technology that would be able to beat the weapon systems designed to intercept the missiles. In that case, this argument works for both sides considering the US could have big swinging dik defense that we dont know about.
It's known tech. They are called hypersonic weapons and are nearly impossible to intercept and destroy. The US is currently behind on this tech by about 5 years. Both Russia and China have it.
post 1612284231 08-01-2020, 12:45 PM
-
#21
  1. tunafishha
  2. Registered CCP
  1. tunafishha
  2. Registered CCP
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 29,114
  5. Rep Power: 27114
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
Theoretically, if China aggressively first strike nuked like 10 of our important cities/naval bases and had the ability to intercept and destroy most of our counterattack nukes, we'd be forced to surrender immiediately

that's why it is important we also keep up with chinese tech and prevent any totally safe first strike capability...sadly this dooms us to be in an arms race if we don't get a treaty, and that makes us all worse off

china, in its own interests, has appropriately vowed never to first strike anyone...the us made no such vow because if we did, we could theoretically be fuked in a conventional war. But conditions are changing to where the US may need to take a no first strike policy. An ideal situation would be everyone taking no first strike and disarming, retaining only core strategic arsenal for deterrence and a halt on further research on new weapons to slow the arms race.
The US isn't going to slow its arms race because they stoled the land. They know that there is too much resources here to give it up. Thats why they army so big.
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
They are called hypersonic weapons and are nearly impossible to intercept and destroy.
Actually... well thats classified.
*Catholic Crew*
*Community College Master Race*
*5'5 Masterrace*
*Starbucks Crew*
*Buy high, sell low*
post 1612284721 08-01-2020, 12:51 PM
-
#22
  1. Lefticle
  2. Registered User
  1. Lefticle
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Height: 6'1"
  5. Weight: 225 lbs
  6. Posts: 29,430
  7. Subscribers: 1
  8. Rep Power: 571788
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
It's known tech. They are called hypersonic weapons and are nearly impossible to intercept and destroy.The US is currently behind on this tech by about 5 years.Both Russia and China have it.
Without a top secret clearance, you have no way of knowing this.

Stop talking out of your ass.
Always Neg Back Crew.
post 1612285111 08-01-2020, 12:59 PM
-
#23
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Lefticle⏩
Without a top secret clearance, you have no way of knowing this.

Stop talking out of your ass.
RAND has top secret clearance. They have repeatedly warned we are behind.
post 1612285351 08-01-2020, 01:01 PM
-
#24
  1. exxtracool
  2. Registered User
  1. exxtracool
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2018
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 20,766
  7. Rep Power: 77972
Originally Posted By Black03mach⏩
There is very little possibility of a Chinese warhead detonating on US soil. There would have to be some sort of unknown technology that would be able to beat the weapon systems designed to intercept the missiles. In that case, this argument works for both sides considering the US could have big swinging dik defense that we dont know about.
right now, no, not really. if this were true that missile defence system would be copied and the worlds nuclear problems would be over and done.


there is no method currently that will intercept even the most basic ICBMs 100% of the time. the current "best" method is the US ground missile defence, which launches counter missiles to strike and destroy the warhead mid flight... keep in mind that you would need to intercept the warhead not the missile, the warhead is TINY by comparison. Take into account also that there are "decoy" warheads and the chances of intercepting the real warhead head-on go down even further.

its the equivalent of shooting a needle that is travelling 5000 m/s

combine that with the fact that these defence counter missiles are far more expensive that the missiles you will be intercepting and combine that with the fact that a country like russia could launch countless ICBM nuclear warheads all at once... well, you get the idea. it wont be a good time.
post 1612286121 08-01-2020, 01:10 PM
-
#25
  1. Lefticle
  2. Registered User
  1. Lefticle
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Height: 6'1"
  5. Weight: 225 lbs
  6. Posts: 29,430
  7. Subscribers: 1
  8. Rep Power: 571788
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
RAND has top secret clearance. They have repeatedly warned we are behind.
If so, how do you know he knows everything about every top secret project? How do you know he isn’t trying to throw people off?

You don’t. So again, stop talking out of your ass.
Always Neg Back Crew.
post 1612287171 08-01-2020, 01:22 PM
-
#26
  1. A-man
  2. Registered User
  1. A-man
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2004
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Age: 43
  6. Posts: 2,434
  7. Rep Power: 12262
Interesting thread. Slightly derailed but that’s okay lol.

China wouldn’t be able to win a war with the US. The Chinese would easily be blockaded by the mighty US navy. They are also boxed in by the Himalayas to the south and west. A war of attrition would result with the US emerging victorious. This is ignoring nukes, which I hope will never be used since it would mean the end of the world anyways. I hope a war with China never materializes too.

Geography is destiny and no one can touch American geography. A country surrounded by friendly nations and oceans that is entirely self sufficient for raw materials is pretty impossible to defeat.

Vietnam? America fought with one hand behind its back. If the us military was able to do what it wanted with no worries about civilians or domestic policy ramifications, it would have decimated the nva/viet cong.
post 1612287331 08-01-2020, 01:24 PM
-
#27
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Lefticle⏩
If so, how do you know he knows everything about every top secret project? How do you know he isn’t trying to throw people off?

You don’t. So again, stop talking out of your ass.
The fact that u referred to RAND as "he" (thinking it was the degenerate congressman) and didn't realize I was talking about the think tank that has informed our nuclear security policy for over half a century tells me u know nothing about this at all.

but this is the same guy that doesn't know how propellant works in guns so...
post 1612287411 08-01-2020, 01:25 PM
-
#28
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
This is the sad reality. Everyone thinks "counter systems" etc... The probability of countering everything in multiple warhead ICBM, let alone a full scale attack, is next to nothing.
Not even ballistic. Ballistics are easy to intercept. We're talking intercontinental hypersonics where the fuking thing's trajectory can't be determined until ur like seconds from impact. lol good luck intercepting that.
post 1612288111 08-01-2020, 01:36 PM
-
#29
  1. tunafishha
  2. Registered CCP
  1. tunafishha
  2. Registered CCP
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 29,114
  5. Rep Power: 27114
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
Not even ballistic. Ballistics are easy to intercept. We're talking intercontinental hypersonics where the fuking thing's trajectory can't be determined until ur like seconds from impact. lol good luck intercepting that.
Lol hypersonics ain't all that. Think about it. If it goes hypersonic, then the warhead will have to be smaller. In that case, your looking at a regular missile, not sum fkn crazy ass nuke.

As for nukes, I would not place so much stock on it as a deterrent or war winner.
*Catholic Crew*
*Community College Master Race*
*5'5 Masterrace*
*Starbucks Crew*
*Buy high, sell low*
post 1612288631 08-01-2020, 01:44 PM
-
#30
  1. climberbrah
  2. Banned
  1. climberbrah
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Posts: 5,282
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
This is the sad reality. Everyone thinks "counter systems" etc... The probability of countering everything in multiple warhead ICBM, let alone a full scale attack, is next to nothing.
Yeah but in an actual nuclear war the USA would dominate those chinese boyos. We have dozens of armed subs roaming their coast ready to launch of hundreds of nuclear warheads on all major cities with a short travel distance from sub. (in addition to our ICBMs).

There's some interesting theories that aren't really publicized about how actual nuclear wars would be fought (and won), and thenotion of a nuclear winter being somewhat false/pseudo science.Having everyone falls in line that nuclear war equals MAD (mutually assured destruction) is far better as it scares everyone from war. In reality MAD isn't really factually based.....


-----

I can somewhat break it down:

China launches 10 ICBMs (their theorized max capability) first strike to USA (their targets are our ICBMs sites in the midwest and some military bases, cities are not the first targets despite what people think).


USA immediately responds during the 35 minute flight path with hundreds of sub based nuke missiles that target every Chinese military installation and nuclear launch site in the country and all communications hubs/air bases/airports


Our missiles more less land at the same time.


After the first exchange, China's ENTIRE military is destroyed, 5 nuclear launch sites are destroyed in the usa (in the middle of nowhere), and 5 military bases.

The USA also contacts Russia directly and informs them they have no intention of fighting a war with them (Russia decides to stay out of this).


With NATO support and Russian ambivalence - the USA now marshalls up every remaining US soldier and invades China. If the Chinese continue to resist with whatever haphazard guerrila force they can put together (not likely since they don't have the 2nd amendment), we respond with targeted tactical nukes at government locations and beijjing (the chinese no longer have nuclear capability anymore, the US has hundreds/thousands remaining).

Nuclear winter does not happen as the amount of dust thrown into the air does not even surpass the Krakatoa explosion in the 1800s. At worst, we have a "summer that never was" and harsh winters for a couple years. I can link several studies that confirm this, even the cuck reddit "ask science" subreddit can't even agree on nuclear winter being a thing. It's a myth.


Only a couple hundred thousand to at max 1 million US citizens die (far less than the average country death rate in WW2).
  1. Page 1 of 2
  2. 1
  3. 2
  5. Last
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts