Forum
»
Why did liberal California cuck Lyft and Uber drivers?
- Results 1 to 23 of 23
-
Page 1 of 1
11-04-2020, 06:11 AM
-
#1
- puzzycrookz
- Banned
-
- puzzycrookz
- Banned
- Join Date: Dec 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 3,400
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Why did liberal California cuck Lyft and Uber drivers?
Why did Prop 22 pass which will make app-based drivers independent contractors instead of employees?
11-04-2020, 06:12 AM
-
#2
- 97Camry4Lyfe
- Registered Sik Kunt
-
- 97Camry4Lyfe
- Registered Sik Kunt
- Join Date: Jul 2015
- Posts: 2,452
- Rep Power: 2271
-
-
Originally Posted By puzzycrookz⏩
188 million spent on advertising by Private Companies (Uber, Lyft, Instacart etc) for Yes on 22Why did Prop 22 pass which will make app-based drivers independent contractors instead of employees?
15 million spent on advertising by unions for No on 22
Advertising works
11-04-2020, 06:14 AM
-
#3
11-04-2020, 10:04 AM
-
#4
- puzzycrookz
- Banned
-
- puzzycrookz
- Banned
- Join Date: Dec 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 3,400
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By quadfecta⏩
I thought liberal California voters would support unions and more employee rights vs corporate profitsProfit margins and shareholder interest>your side hustle
11-04-2020, 10:08 AM
-
#5
- knightofday
- Registered User
-
- knightofday
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2013
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 14,588
- Rep Power: 126002
-
-
Originally Posted By puzzycrookz⏩
Those "employee rights" forced lyft and uber to lay off tens of thousands of workers lmao. People have no idea how economics work haha, Prop 22 is a great thingI thought liberalCalifornia voters would support unions and more employee rightsvs corporate profits
11-04-2020, 10:14 AM
-
#6
California has a lot of similarities to communist countries. In both places the elite at the top get all the goodies. They both talk a lot about "the workers", "diversity" and other crap but in the end its all about the elite.
11-04-2020, 10:39 AM
-
#7
Originally Posted By puzzycrookz⏩
isn't that what they are?Why did Prop 22 pass which will make app-based drivers independent contractors
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit softly.
11-04-2020, 10:45 AM
-
#8
- LobsterRageFist
- Platinum Member
-
- LobsterRageFist
- Platinum Member
- Join Date: May 2011
- Posts: 4,556
- Rep Power: 12600
-
-
I live in CA and a ton was spent on Yes on 22, hardly noticed No on 22 ads at all.
The ads were pretty deceptive and made it seem as if Yes on 22 was good for the drivers.
They got Mothers Against Drunk Drivers to shill for them as well, I guess MADD figures the larger available slave driver pool the less drunks on the road?
Perhaps deep down CA Uber/Lyft riders know that keeping driving independent = cheaper rides, and prefer their cheap rides to more expensive rides with happier drivers, the same reason most people don't tip their rideshare drivers and delivery people.
The ads were pretty deceptive and made it seem as if Yes on 22 was good for the drivers.
They got Mothers Against Drunk Drivers to shill for them as well, I guess MADD figures the larger available slave driver pool the less drunks on the road?
Perhaps deep down CA Uber/Lyft riders know that keeping driving independent = cheaper rides, and prefer their cheap rides to more expensive rides with happier drivers, the same reason most people don't tip their rideshare drivers and delivery people.
Look, you're my best friend, so don't take this the wrong way but, in 20 years if you're still here postin' in hhhnnnggg threads, beggin' for mod reps, and braggin' about whales you harpooned from POF, I'll f'in kill ya. That's not a threat, that's a fact, I'll f'in kill ya. You got somethin' none of us have, and you don't owe it to yourself man, you owe it to me. Cuz tomorrow I'm gonna wake up and I'll be red, and I'll still be a socially awkward/FA. And that's all right.
11-04-2020, 10:47 AM
-
#9
- dannyg1217
- Registered User
-
- dannyg1217
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2007
- Location: Greeley, Colorado, United States
- Age: 45
- Posts: 14,987
- Rep Power: 62602
-
-
Originally Posted By mvitz⏩
nonsense916 is going to be out of another jobCalifornia has a lot of similarities to communist countries. In both places the elite at the top get all the goodies. They both talk a lot about "the workers", "diversity" and other crap but in the end its all about the elite.
Yellow fever crew
High test Manlet crew
EE master race
5'7" @ 175
PRs, B325 S405 D405
11-04-2020, 10:49 AM
-
#10
- amikaelmorris
- drink more water
-
- amikaelmorris
- drink more water
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: Vista, California, United States
- Posts: 27,540
- Rep Power: 88893
-
-
Originally Posted By knightofday⏩
it's crazy right? they probably would've outright pulled out of california if it didn't passThose "employee rights" forced lyft and uber to lay off tens of thousands of workers lmao. People have no idea how economics work haha, Prop 22 is a great thing
nobody driving ubers wants a fixed schedule
11-04-2020, 11:33 AM
-
#11
- knightofday
- Registered User
-
- knightofday
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2013
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 14,588
- Rep Power: 126002
-
-
Originally Posted By LobsterRageFist⏩
You trolling bro? The drivers were FURIOUS when AB5 was passed. You think drivers are happy when they dont have a fuking job? lmaoI live in CA and a ton was spent on Yes on 22, hardly noticed No on 22 ads at all.
The ads were pretty deceptive and made it seem as if Yes on 22 was good for the drivers.
They got Mothers Against Drunk Drivers to shill for them as well, I guess MADD figures the larger available slave driver pool the less drunks on the road?
Perhaps deep down CA Uber/Lyft riders know that keeping driving independent = cheaper rides, andprefer their cheap rides to more expensive rides with happier drivers, the same reason most people don't tip their rideshare drivers and delivery people.
The ads were pretty deceptive and made it seem as if Yes on 22 was good for the drivers.
They got Mothers Against Drunk Drivers to shill for them as well, I guess MADD figures the larger available slave driver pool the less drunks on the road?
Perhaps deep down CA Uber/Lyft riders know that keeping driving independent = cheaper rides, andprefer their cheap rides to more expensive rides with happier drivers, the same reason most people don't tip their rideshare drivers and delivery people.
Originally Posted By amikaelmorris⏩
Uber and Lyft flat out said if Prop 22 failed they wereleaving CA completely,it was no secret. Blows my mind how people like the guy above are talking about "happier drivers" lmaooooo there wouldnt be any fuking drivers you doorknob.it's crazy right? they probably would've outright pulled out of california if it didn't pass
nobody driving ubers wants a fixed schedule
nobody driving ubers wants a fixed schedule
Dman some people are soo ignorant it hurts man
11-04-2020, 11:41 AM
-
#12
- Glutebrahhh
- Glutes of Peace
-
- Glutebrahhh
- Glutes of Peace
- Join Date: Sep 2020
- Posts: 4,079
- Rep Power: 16807
-
-
Originally Posted By knightofday⏩
Strong comprehension.You trolling bro? The drivers were FURIOUS when AB5 was passed. You think drivers are happy when they dont have a fuking job? lmao
Uber and Lyft flat out said if Prop 22 failed they wereleaving CA completely,it was no secret. Blows my mind how people like the guy above are talking about "happier drivers" lmaooooo there wouldnt be any fuking drivers you doorknob.
Dman some people are soo ignorant it hurts man
Uber and Lyft flat out said if Prop 22 failed they wereleaving CA completely,it was no secret. Blows my mind how people like the guy above are talking about "happier drivers" lmaooooo there wouldnt be any fuking drivers you doorknob.
Dman some people are soo ignorant it hurts man
Lobster was speaking from a riders perspective, not the drivers. Riders DGAF about the drivers.
11-04-2020, 11:42 AM
-
#13
- LobsterRageFist
- Platinum Member
-
- LobsterRageFist
- Platinum Member
- Join Date: May 2011
- Posts: 4,556
- Rep Power: 12600
-
-
Originally Posted By knightofday⏩
AB5 definitely needed to be fixed, but to let Uber and Lyft decide how to fix it didn't gibe very well with actual drivers:You trolling bro? The drivers were FURIOUS when AB5 was passed. You think drivers are happy when they dont have a fuking job? lmao
Uber and Lyft flat out said if Prop 22 failed they wereleaving CA completely,it was no secret. Blows my mind how people like the guy above are talking about "happier drivers" lmaooooo there wouldnt be any fuking drivers you doorknob.
Dman some people are soo ignorant it hurts man
Uber and Lyft flat out said if Prop 22 failed they wereleaving CA completely,it was no secret. Blows my mind how people like the guy above are talking about "happier drivers" lmaooooo there wouldnt be any fuking drivers you doorknob.
Dman some people are soo ignorant it hurts man
https://uberpeople.net/threads/up-prop-22-poll.409468/
Look, you're my best friend, so don't take this the wrong way but, in 20 years if you're still here postin' in hhhnnnggg threads, beggin' for mod reps, and braggin' about whales you harpooned from POF, I'll f'in kill ya. That's not a threat, that's a fact, I'll f'in kill ya. You got somethin' none of us have, and you don't owe it to yourself man, you owe it to me. Cuz tomorrow I'm gonna wake up and I'll be red, and I'll still be a socially awkward/FA. And that's all right.
11-04-2020, 11:43 AM
-
#14
- MBisonSon
- Registered User
-
- MBisonSon
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2016
- Posts: 39,767
- Rep Power: 166638
-
-
Originally Posted By knightofday⏩
Hey retard do you not understand there are several other ride-sharing platforms besides Uber?You trolling bro? The drivers were FURIOUS when AB5 was passed. You think drivers are happy when they dont have a fuking job? lmao
Uber and Lyft flat out said if Prop 22 failed they wereleaving CA completely,it was no secret. Blows my mind how people like the guy above are talking about "happier drivers" lmaooooo there wouldnt be any fuking drivers you doorknob.
Dman some people are soo ignorant it hurts man
Uber and Lyft flat out said if Prop 22 failed they wereleaving CA completely,it was no secret. Blows my mind how people like the guy above are talking about "happier drivers" lmaooooo there wouldnt be any fuking drivers you doorknob.
Dman some people are soo ignorant it hurts man
The billionaire and the beggar both have 24 hours in a day.
That's why grandma's apple pie rocks and yours sucks.Originally Posted By Dave22reborn^^^Racist police officer who also cries about how racism doesn't exist, also cries reverse racism and typifies the stupidity of the racist right, referring to black people as "they" and regurgitating racist stereotypes.At least it will thunderstorm tonight, and we know how they feel about water. :)
11-04-2020, 11:43 AM
-
#15
Originally Posted By 97Camry4Lyfe⏩
Buying out politicians has been working out the best though.188 million spent on advertising by Private Companies (Uber, Lyft, Instacart etc) for Yes on 22
15 million spent on advertising by unions for No on 22
Advertising works
15 million spent on advertising by unions for No on 22
Advertising works
11-04-2020, 11:44 AM
-
#16
11-04-2020, 11:52 AM
-
#17
11-05-2020, 08:59 AM
-
#18
- DarthCholo
- Registered User
-
- DarthCholo
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2019
- Posts: 2,462
- Rep Power: 14547
-
-
Millennials don’t like to drive. They love their Uber so this would hit them hard. The ones that do drive like being lazy and having a job that it only 4hrs a day during call of duty and fortnight breaks
11-05-2020, 09:32 AM
-
#19
11-05-2020, 10:52 AM
-
#20
- Holyfenix
- Registered User
-
- Holyfenix
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2014
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 8,018
- Rep Power: 55892
-
-
Liberals are short sighted and they knew making these drivers employees would mean higher lyft and uber rates. No liberal is going to pay more than they half to. If its something that is going to take a decade (speed rail) then they are all in on spending other peoples money.
*Updated* If you can't hit a 320 yard drive, are you even a man?
11-05-2020, 10:57 AM
-
#21
- MuzzieChik786
- Registered User
-
- MuzzieChik786
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2013
- Posts: 28,332
- Rep Power: 273734
-
-
It's not cuckening.
If that ballot measure would have passed, not only the drivers would have bailed (because they'd make less than what they're making today for crappy health insurance), but the companies would not have made any money and vacated CA.
Only a few drivers wanted those extra benefits. Most of those drivers are on medi-cal/medicare or covered California health plans. They don't need benefits, they need higher wages.
If that ballot measure would have passed, not only the drivers would have bailed (because they'd make less than what they're making today for crappy health insurance), but the companies would not have made any money and vacated CA.
Only a few drivers wanted those extra benefits. Most of those drivers are on medi-cal/medicare or covered California health plans. They don't need benefits, they need higher wages.
Thus let me live, unseen, unknown;
Thus unlamented let me die;
Steal from the world, and not a stone
Tell where I lie.
2/17/15 - Dunk Tank Results: 15% bf (Omron said 18.6%) - 123.4 lbs LBM
11-05-2020, 11:04 AM
-
#22
11-05-2020, 11:07 AM
-
#23
- knightofday
- Registered User
-
- knightofday
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2013
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 14,588
- Rep Power: 126002
-
-
Originally Posted By domenuts⏩
Can we pin this post to the top and lock the thread semi-srsUsed to be part of upper management in the industry and met with Lyft and Uber multiple times regarding this.These drivers are lucky Prop 22 passed or they wouldn't have jobs. Uber and Lyft were planning on leaving Cali if it didn't.
The business model would be non profitable if they were considered employees. Non profitable by a serious margin.
Anyone that says they should be employees is a liberal cuck
Being an employee<Having a job
The business model would be non profitable if they were considered employees. Non profitable by a serious margin.
Anyone that says they should be employees is a liberal cuck
Being an employee<Having a job
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts