Update scheduled for 16:50 MT (00:50 CEST). Update is expected to take a few seconds. Please save your work beforehand.

Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
Β» Cum dumpster mother of 3 phucks age 14 Chad while Timothy waits downstairs
  1. Results 331 to 360 of 519
  2. First
  3. 10
  4. 11
  5. 12
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. Last
post 1624345011 12-03-2020, 12:01 AM
-
#331
  1. LinuxJon
  1. LinuxJon
  2. Join Date: Apr 2014
  3. Location: California, United States
  4. Posts: 49,073
  5. Rep Power: 325966
I'll be totally honest here.

An older guy sleeping with a <18 year old (or even just significantly younger if early 20s chick) is totally wrong. They're almost certainly exploiting them and doing harm.

An older chick sleeping with a teen guy..... eehhhhh. Most guys between 14-18 are already willing to **** anything that walks. Yeah I don't think it's healthy and I think there should be consequences for teachers or chicks in positions of authority for it. But you're not scarring the dude. You're probably making him a god among his friends and putting his confidence through the roof.
480s / 370b / 495d / 235 x 2 SOHP

Trump 2020
DeSantis 2024
Catbrah 2032

Misc Firearms Crew
Misc Wristwatch Crew
Will sell wife's foot pics for watch/gun money crew
Definitely not a fed crew
post 1624345121 12-03-2020, 12:03 AM
-
#332
  1. snailsrus
  2. πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸͺ³
  1. snailsrus
  2. πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸͺ³
  3. Join Date: Apr 2016
  4. Posts: 15,306
  5. Rep Power: 189841
Originally Posted By backinthegymbro
I had a blonde history teacher who would always compliment me. Once she said in front of the entire class that ''backinthegymbro'' was the best looking guy in this class.
Which was weird af and gave me some nasty looks from other guys.

At the end of the year, a guy i knew from the class told me that he and 2 others (all 15) were fingering her and touching her entire body.
He said she didn't say a single word. She didn't move. She just let it happen.
Now this was a tall good looking guy who wasn't the type to brag or lie. So i believe it but i wasn't there.

Makes me wonder if that sloot teacher wanted my dik. That said, she was around a 5/10, maybe a bit higher if you're into older women.
Didn't look bad for age 43 but i'm not into milfs. Tldr: sloots gonna sloot.
men do it too my dads 60 year old friends started making sexual comments about my body at 14 -\_o_/-

When I told my dad he said I shouldn’t dress like a sloot. Lol
SuperHercules crew
cancer survivor crew
Dyslexic crew
Friend of Mr.Wilson crew
Ugly and old cell crew
Cat crew
Insomniac crew
post 1624345521 12-03-2020, 12:12 AM
-
#333
  1. CopeFear
  2. Degenmaxxer
  1. CopeFear
  2. Degenmaxxer
  3. Join Date: Apr 2020
  4. Posts: 9,505
  5. Rep Power: 39017
Originally Posted By LinuxJon
I'll be totally honest here.

An older guy sleeping with a <18 year old (or even just significantly younger if early 20s chick) is totally wrong. They're almost certainly exploiting them and doing harm.

An older chick sleeping with a teen guy..... eehhhhh. Most guys between 14-18 are already willing to **** anything that walks. Yeah I don't think it's healthy and I think there should be consequences for teachers or chicks in positions of authority for it. But you're not scarring the dude. You're probably making him a god among his friends and putting his confidence through the roof.
If it's not rape or by "force", it must be consentual.

If people think an older man fukking a younger sloot is taking advantage of her (when it's consentual) it just goes to show how stupid society thinks sloots are.
Yellow Fever Crew
post 1624345911 12-03-2020, 12:22 AM
-
#334
  1. HannoCometh
  2. Gingers are human too
  1. HannoCometh
  2. Gingers are human too
  3. Join Date: Apr 2019
  4. Posts: 18,566
  5. Rep Power: 9117
Originally Posted By CopeFear
If it's not rape or by "force", it must be consentual.

If people think an older man fukking a younger sloot is taking advantage of her (when it's consentual) it just goes to show how stupid society thinks sloots are.
It's according to the laws of your countries.

In most jurisdiction, the law does not view a person under 16 or under 18 as being able to give consent (even if the 15 year old or 17 year old was "perfectly willing"); now sure, "perfectly willing" could be used as a mitigating factor, but as far as the law is concerned, no consent was given regardless.

It's according to the laws in your jurisdiction brah, not how people look, act, dress, feel, talk or walk.

That is why in most jurisdictions, the term is referred to as "statutory rape".
Battlefield 8 fan
Betelgeuse is coming Crew
Gliese 710 Crew
"Phytoandrogens are a thing, apparently..."
-Comments attributed to HannoCometh (2021)
β€’|PHYTOANDROGENS (discovered by Misc around March '21)|β€’
β€’β€’||02/22/22 - Acquired The Moncler Space Company, former subsidiary of Moncler S.p.A ded fkn srs
β€’β€’||02/24/22 - Honorary Director for life (USFS and USDOI Bureau of Land Management)
Aspiring Sasquatch Crew
Anti-soya Crew
Active service, War on Soya [2021-ongoing]
post 1624346151 12-03-2020, 12:27 AM
-
#335
  1. snailsrus
  2. πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸͺ³
  1. snailsrus
  2. πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸͺ³
  3. Join Date: Apr 2016
  4. Posts: 15,306
  5. Rep Power: 189841
Originally Posted By CopeFear
If it's not rape or by "force", it must be consentual.

If people think an older man fukking a younger sloot is taking advantage of her (when it's consentual) it just goes to show how stupid society thinks sloots are.
in 2021 you will be blessed with a daughter
SuperHercules crew
cancer survivor crew
Dyslexic crew
Friend of Mr.Wilson crew
Ugly and old cell crew
Cat crew
Insomniac crew
post 1624346271 12-03-2020, 12:28 AM
-
#336
  1. demfeelsbro
  2. Jelqbrah
  1. demfeelsbro
  2. Jelqbrah
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Posts: 15,441
  5. Rep Power: 127013
Originally Posted By snailsrus
men do it too my dads 60 year old friends started making sexual comments about my body at 14 -\_o_/-


When I told my dad he said I shouldn’t dress like a sloot. Lol
would have a beer with your dad
post 1624347451 12-03-2020, 12:58 AM
-
#337
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By Adnim
holy fuk this place attracts some brainwashed idiots
Because I don't believe men and women are the same?
post 1624347641 12-03-2020, 01:02 AM
-
#338
  1. LinuxJon
  1. LinuxJon
  2. Join Date: Apr 2014
  3. Location: California, United States
  4. Posts: 49,073
  5. Rep Power: 325966
Originally Posted By CopeFear
If it's not rape or by "force", it must be consentual.

If people think an older man fukking a younger sloot is taking advantage of her (when it's consentual)it just goes to show how stupid society thinks sloots are.
You're missing the big picture.

Guys want to have sex for the physical act of sex. Girls, mostly, desire sex for the emotional, for procreation, etc. Nobody 34 is sleeping with an 17 year old for the reasons a 17 year old female is biologically programmed to seek.
480s / 370b / 495d / 235 x 2 SOHP

Trump 2020
DeSantis 2024
Catbrah 2032

Misc Firearms Crew
Misc Wristwatch Crew
Will sell wife's foot pics for watch/gun money crew
Definitely not a fed crew
post 1624348591 12-03-2020, 01:30 AM
-
#339
  1. CopeFear
  2. Degenmaxxer
  1. CopeFear
  2. Degenmaxxer
  3. Join Date: Apr 2020
  4. Posts: 9,505
  5. Rep Power: 39017
Originally Posted By HannoCometh
It's according to the laws of your countries.

In most jurisdiction, the law does not view a person under 16 or under 18 as being able to give consent (even if the 15 year old or 17 year old was "perfectly willing"); now sure, "perfectly willing" could be used as a mitigating factor, but as far as the law is concerned, no consent was given regardless.

It's according to the laws in your jurisdiction brah, not how people look, act, dress, feel, talk or walk.

That is why in most jurisdictions, the term is referred to as "statutory rape".
Sloot aged 15 years and 364 days

Sloot aged 16 years and 0 days

Nothing changed, but magically she can "give consent" now that another day passed. What changed? And the difference between fukking both of them is jail time vs freedom. JFL.
Yellow Fever Crew
post 1624348711 12-03-2020, 01:34 AM
-
#340
  1. HannoCometh
  2. Gingers are human too
  1. HannoCometh
  2. Gingers are human too
  3. Join Date: Apr 2019
  4. Posts: 18,566
  5. Rep Power: 9117
Originally Posted By CopeFear
Sloot aged 15 years and 364 days

Sloot aged 16 years and 0 days

Nothing changed, but magically she can "give consent" now that another day passed. What changed? And the difference between fukking both of them is jail time vs freedom. JFL.
I'm afraid you're bringing emotion into this, brah.

Sure, a day or two may contribute to "mitigating" in defense, but the law is the law and that is according to your jurisdiction. The "victim" could be an hour away from 16 for all the law cares, it'd still technically be "statutory rape". Sure, it's according to your jurisdiction and whether the DA's office and/or a judge would let such a case see the light of day/waste their time, but this is all hypothetical and to do with technicalities - cops may never find out etc but it does happen.

TL;DR At the stroke of.midnight, you're good to go, the law says (depending on your jurisdiction).
Battlefield 8 fan
Betelgeuse is coming Crew
Gliese 710 Crew
"Phytoandrogens are a thing, apparently..."
-Comments attributed to HannoCometh (2021)
β€’|PHYTOANDROGENS (discovered by Misc around March '21)|β€’
β€’β€’||02/22/22 - Acquired The Moncler Space Company, former subsidiary of Moncler S.p.A ded fkn srs
β€’β€’||02/24/22 - Honorary Director for life (USFS and USDOI Bureau of Land Management)
Aspiring Sasquatch Crew
Anti-soya Crew
Active service, War on Soya [2021-ongoing]
post 1624349371 12-03-2020, 01:55 AM
-
#341
  1. dbzfan111
  2. Banned
  1. dbzfan111
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 2
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Gainzzz
There is no such thing as a "fully grown" 14 year old you doofus. There are 14 year olds who have developed tits and ass. That is not fully grown under any reasonable definition.

And we are not just talking about attraction, you were talking about fuking them, KNOWING that they are 14 years old, JFL.

But even still, attraction goes beyond just the physical. If you're sexually attracted to a very convincing tranny without knowing they're a tranny, that doesn't make you bisexual. If you're still sexually attracted to the tranny after finding out that it's a man in make-up, you're definitely not straight. It's the same with age. I can't even believe I have to explain this. You're fuked in the head.

Anyway, I'm not going round in circles for another hour.

You do you buddy boyo.

Just know that you don't have some irrefutable argument like you think you do. Bring this up IRL and you will either be laughed out of the room or get your head kicked in for being a kiddie fiddler. But yea, I'm sure it's everyone else's fault for being sheep or closed minded or something LOL.
Strong moron. If his argument isn't irrefutable, why don't you challenge it? So far he's exposed your logic as weak and stupid af.

Actually, this guys profile pic is a picture of his phone. No doubt hes stupid as fuk.

Also wouldn't be surprised if you're projecting and you are a ****phile, given that you said that 12 year old was hawt, lmao
post 1624349781 12-03-2020, 02:10 AM
-
#342
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By Adnim
It doesn't make a fukkin difference if he was as strong physically as her. Deep down he knows he's just a boy and she's a grown woman. He knows if he makes her mad or disappoints her in anyway she can 'get him in trouble'. He was raised in a culture where "women/girls are always right, men/boys are always wrong. If a female wants something you have, you have to give it to her, or else".

You sound brainwashed af by Hollywood and mainstream media.
Just lmfao @ these mental gymnastics.

As if this brah hasn't watched 10 sloot teachers every year sent upstate for doing the exact thing this bish was doing. JFL if you think power dynamics only travel in one direction at any time.

brb he was so ashamed about it he was telling his friends, and that's how the rumor reached the sloot who snitched
brb he was so ashamed that he didn't just go to the cops himself, which "victims" of "sexual assault" are told to do constantly
brb he was so ashamed that the "concerned parents" came to the bish to complain about he phucking the brah and not raping him
brb he was so ashamed that several eyewitnesses to the case described him as an "idiot" (jfl if you think that's how grape victims are talked about)
brb don't wanna make the sloot mad, better get a hard-on

If you think this sex was not consensual you are a female miscer tier delusional. If you want to debate statutory laws that's a completely different conversation, but lmfao I was like lmfao at claiming this is akin to pinning a female down, ripping her clothing off, forcibly penetrating her as she screams for help, ejaculating, and then leaving.
post 1624349931 12-03-2020, 02:16 AM
-
#343
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By noobdoctor
you're wrong after the first 5 words
lmfao
post 1624350111 12-03-2020, 02:24 AM
-
#344
  1. SteCarrell
  2. Registered User
  1. SteCarrell
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 10
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Rajc
how is she not a rapist? she is 30+ and he is less than 18
i literally cant even right now
so 17 is still a child in your eyes? Holy chit you're a fukin retard
post 1624350161 12-03-2020, 02:26 AM
-
#345
  1. SteCarrell
  2. Registered User
  1. SteCarrell
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 10
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By HannoCometh
I'm afraid you're bringing emotion into this, brah.

Sure, a day or two may contribute to "mitigating" in defense, but the law is the law and that is according to your jurisdiction. The "victim" could be an hour away from 16 for all the law cares, it'd still technically be "statutory rape". Sure, it's according to your jurisdiction and whether the DA's office and/or a judge would let such a case see the light of day/waste their time, but this is all hypothetical and to do with technicalities - cops may never find out etc but it does happen.

TL;DR At the stroke of.midnight, you're good to go, the law says (depending on your jurisdiction).
No one gives a fuk about the law here, we're talking in basic terms here. And 14 is NOT a child.
post 1624350181 12-03-2020, 02:27 AM
-
#346
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By HannoCometh
I'm afraid you're bringing emotion into this, brah.

Sure, a day or two may contribute to "mitigating" in defense, but the law is the law and that is according to your jurisdiction. The "victim" could be an hour away from 16 for all the law cares, it'd still technically be "statutory rape". Sure, it's according to your jurisdiction and whether the DA's office and/or a judge would let such a case see the light of day/waste their time, but this is all hypothetical and to do with technicalities - cops may never find out etc but it does happen.

TL;DR At the stroke of.midnight, you're good to go, the law says (depending on your jurisdiction).
But the brah is trying to argue that having a hard and fast number associated with "the age of consent" will ultimately be proved arbitrary at some point.

You're more or less agreeing with that logic here.

Courtsshouldhave the ability to make value judgements in cases like this one just as they do in robbery and murder cases. Think about it for 10 seconds brah, if you killed someone you immediately get the electric chair right? Wrong, there is a such thing as self-defense, there is a such thing as manslaughter, this such a thing as 2nd degree murder. The extenuating circumstance of the event have some pretty serious implications on the outcome of a case. (i.e. self-defense might mean you have to take an anger-management class on the weekend, and not even pay a fine compared to premeditated murder in the first where your life is in play now)

But because age of consent laws are (almost exclusively) used against men, in the service of protecting women, it is a hard and fast, black and white issue with absolutely no lenience or flexibility for corner cases or extreme circumstances and sometimes that bullchit backfires and the sloot/simp alliance accidentally spray one of their own with their toxic lawmaking.

Just
L
O
L
post 1624350211 12-03-2020, 02:28 AM
-
#347
  1. EoR
  2. 2021 Mr.Internet
  1. EoR
  2. 2021 Mr.Internet
  3. Join Date: Feb 2005
  4. Posts: 35,083
  5. Rep Power: 160146
lol this aged slut has so much make-up she could be an anime character. Probably has wrinkly, scared up skin under all that cake. Another person of zero value outside of sex.
Originally Posted By TomWanks
Bingo.

I would 100% bet the sex was consensual though and these two youngbrahs are being made to retroactively act like victims because their moms found out.

Female-rape denier crew. It's not rape when you can end the interaction at any time by force. He allegedly did that here, but I'd bet it happened after he busted and she was trying to snuggle.



Disagree. She didn't do anything other sloot, which should be shamed of course-- but slooting is not a jailable offense yet unfortunately.
lol it's statutory rape by law. It doesn't mean sh*t that the 14 year consented.

14 years old.

RajC is going overboard with technicalities vs biological reality. 75% of the world 16+ is legal. 17 is a minor in the eyes of very few areas. But it doesn't matter if its 16, 17, or 18, just obey the laws where you are and there are no problems - but also APPLY the laws equally for both sexes.

There's no grey area with 14 lol, she should be serving hard time and all the slut teachers doing the same.
EoR is powered by unique Nanomolecular Hyperdispersion Technology. Giving him high bioavailability and myocellular saturation.
post 1624350531 12-03-2020, 02:40 AM
-
#348
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By EoR
lol this aged slut has so much make-up she could be an anime character. Probably has wrinkly, scared up skin under all that cake. Another person of zero value outside of sex.




lol it's statutory rape by law. It doesn't mean sh*t that the 14 year consented.

14 years old.

RajC is going overboard with technicalities vs biological reality. 75% of the world 16+ is legal. 17 is a minor in the eyes of very few areas. But it doesn't matter if its 16, 17, or 18, just obey the laws where you are and there are no problems - but also APPLY the laws equally for both sexes.

There's no grey area with 14 lol, she should be serving hard time and all the slut teachers doing the same.
I'm not saying she shouldn't face consequences. The law is the law and it should be equally enforced. The point is that this black-and-white lawmaking that I mention in #362 is going to result in some pretty ridiculous rulings. For example -- this one. Rapacious demon sloot seduces 14 year old boy and lures him to sex dungeon with promise of male-version of Uggs and iPad bb.

It's absurd on the face of it brah.
post 1624350581 12-03-2020, 02:42 AM
-
#349
  1. CopeFear
  2. Degenmaxxer
  1. CopeFear
  2. Degenmaxxer
  3. Join Date: Apr 2020
  4. Posts: 9,505
  5. Rep Power: 39017
Originally Posted By EoR
lol it's statutory rape by law. It doesn't mean sh*t that the 14 year consented.

14 years old.


RajC is going overboard with technicalities vs biological reality. 75% of the world 16+ is legal. 17 is a minor in the eyes of very few areas. But it doesn't matter if its 16, 17, or 18, just obey the laws where you are and there are no problems - but also APPLY the laws equally for both sexes.

There's no grey area with 14 lol, she should be serving hard time and all the slut teachers doing the same.
So what if the 14yo Chad hit on her and woo'd her into opening her gash for him? Is that still "rape"?

JFL @ the cucked gynocentric laws like "age of consent".
Yellow Fever Crew
post 1624350611 12-03-2020, 02:42 AM
-
#350
  1. SteCarrell
  2. Registered User
  1. SteCarrell
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 10
  6. Rep Power: 0
[QUOTE=Rajc post_id=1624350201]how am i a retard? it is literally a minor

[i[/img]

[u[/url][/QUOTE]The law varies. 16 is legal where i am.

Its hilarious how you let your regional age of consent determine how you view this. I understand following your local laws, but to use it as a means biologically and coming to the conclusion 17 is a child makes you a retard. It's Like you don't possess the critical knowledge of thinking ability to discern between a child and adult yourself. If you seriously think a 17 year old is child, you are beyond cucked. Brb not an adult until it strikes midnight after 365 days
post 1624350751 12-03-2020, 02:46 AM
-
#351
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By CopeFear
So what if the 14yo Chad hit on her and woo'd her into opening her gash for him? Is that still "rape"?

JFL @ the cucked gynocentric laws like "age of consent".
Yes obviously you sexist toxic cishet white male extremely not srs.

On spread.
post 1624350761 12-03-2020, 02:46 AM
-
#352
  1. SteCarrell
  2. Registered User
  1. SteCarrell
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 10
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By EoR
lol this aged slut has so much make-up she could be an anime character. Probably has wrinkly, scared up skin under all that cake. Another person of zero value outside of sex.




lol it's statutory rape by law. It doesn't mean sh*t that the 14 year consented.

14 years old.

RajC is going overboard with technicalities vs biological reality. 75% of the world 16+ is legal. 17 is a minor in the eyes of very few areas. But it doesn't matter if its 16, 17, or 18, just obey the laws where you are and there are no problems - but also APPLY the laws equally for both sexes.

There's no grey area with 14 lol, she should be serving hard time and all the slut teachers doing the same.
14 is still legal in many countries. Even in Serbia 14 is legal.

14 is NOT a child. Stop acting like it is.
post 1624350801 12-03-2020, 02:47 AM
-
#353
  1. SteCarrell
  2. Registered User
  1. SteCarrell
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 10
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Rajc
jfl at how hard you took the bait and then say this:



hahahahahaha
You got me
post 1624350901 12-03-2020, 02:52 AM
-
#354
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Originally Posted By TomWanks
I'm not saying she shouldn't face consequences. The law is the law and it should be equally enforced. The point is that this black-and-white lawmaking that I mention in #362 is going to result in some pretty ridiculous rulings. For example -- this one. Rapacious demon sloot seduces 14 year old boy and lures him to sex dungeon with promise of male-version of Uggs and iPad bb.

It's absurd on the face of it brah.
I generally agree with you but there are such thing as 'Romeo and Juliet laws' so it's not always black and white.
post 1624351021 12-03-2020, 02:59 AM
-
#355
  1. HannoCometh
  2. Gingers are human too
  1. HannoCometh
  2. Gingers are human too
  3. Join Date: Apr 2019
  4. Posts: 18,566
  5. Rep Power: 9117
Originally Posted By SteCarrell
No one gives a fuk about the law here, we're talking in basic terms here. And 14 is NOT a child.
I'm afraid that in most jurisdictions around the world, a 14 year old cannot legally give consent. An adult having sex with a 14 year old girl or boy would be tried for statutory rape and last likely found guilty (whether the teenager was "willing" or no.

Also, in a general sense, in most countries any person under 18 is generally considered a child and not a legal adult, although driving and sexual age of consent laws may differ according to the jurisdiction.

So, you are wrong there, bud.
Battlefield 8 fan
Betelgeuse is coming Crew
Gliese 710 Crew
"Phytoandrogens are a thing, apparently..."
-Comments attributed to HannoCometh (2021)
β€’|PHYTOANDROGENS (discovered by Misc around March '21)|β€’
β€’β€’||02/22/22 - Acquired The Moncler Space Company, former subsidiary of Moncler S.p.A ded fkn srs
β€’β€’||02/24/22 - Honorary Director for life (USFS and USDOI Bureau of Land Management)
Aspiring Sasquatch Crew
Anti-soya Crew
Active service, War on Soya [2021-ongoing]
post 1624351111 12-03-2020, 03:02 AM
-
#356
  1. HannoCometh
  2. Gingers are human too
  1. HannoCometh
  2. Gingers are human too
  3. Join Date: Apr 2019
  4. Posts: 18,566
  5. Rep Power: 9117
Originally Posted By SteCarrell
14 is still legal in many countries. Even in Serbia 14 is legal.

14 is NOT a child. Stop acting like it is.
Not in many countries - and it's probably not as simple as you're letting it on to bd, even in Serbia.

Outline the specific for Serbia for instance.
In some states in the US, for example, it's 16 (although the Federal age of consent is 18). Now, although it's 16 or 18 in some states, there may be something known as the "rule of two" exception - i.e. even though it's 16, it may be the case that only an age gap of 2 years is permitted if folks are under 18 and at the very least, may be a sexual misdemeanour if one is more than 2 years older than the other "participant".

It's probably not as simple as you're making it out to be lol
Battlefield 8 fan
Betelgeuse is coming Crew
Gliese 710 Crew
"Phytoandrogens are a thing, apparently..."
-Comments attributed to HannoCometh (2021)
β€’|PHYTOANDROGENS (discovered by Misc around March '21)|β€’
β€’β€’||02/22/22 - Acquired The Moncler Space Company, former subsidiary of Moncler S.p.A ded fkn srs
β€’β€’||02/24/22 - Honorary Director for life (USFS and USDOI Bureau of Land Management)
Aspiring Sasquatch Crew
Anti-soya Crew
Active service, War on Soya [2021-ongoing]
post 1624351141 12-03-2020, 03:06 AM
-
#357
  1. HannoCometh
  2. Gingers are human too
  1. HannoCometh
  2. Gingers are human too
  3. Join Date: Apr 2019
  4. Posts: 18,566
  5. Rep Power: 9117
Originally Posted By SteCarrell
The law varies. 16 is legal where i am.

Its hilarious how you let your regional age of consent determine how you view this. I understand following your local laws, but to use it as a means biologically and coming to the conclusion 17 is a child makes you a retard. It's Like you don't possess the critical knowledge of thinking ability to discern between a child and adult yourself. If you seriously think a 17 year old is child, you are beyond cucked. Brb not an adult until it strikes midnight after 365 days
Okay, look here f*cking Viking - in the eyes of the law, that is not an adult (hence a child).

If your grandfather leaves millions to you in his will and stipulated that you will not receive any of the cash until you turn 21, are you, a 16 year old gonna then say "but wait, I'm 17 next month and I think I'm an adult!" It doesn't matter what you feel or think, it matters what is on your birth certificate and what the law in your jurisdiction says.

Until the stroke of midnight, that's a minor, bud. A minor is not an adult. A 13 year old, for example, is not allowed to drive a car etc
Battlefield 8 fan
Betelgeuse is coming Crew
Gliese 710 Crew
"Phytoandrogens are a thing, apparently..."
-Comments attributed to HannoCometh (2021)
β€’|PHYTOANDROGENS (discovered by Misc around March '21)|β€’
β€’β€’||02/22/22 - Acquired The Moncler Space Company, former subsidiary of Moncler S.p.A ded fkn srs
β€’β€’||02/24/22 - Honorary Director for life (USFS and USDOI Bureau of Land Management)
Aspiring Sasquatch Crew
Anti-soya Crew
Active service, War on Soya [2021-ongoing]
post 1624351161 12-03-2020, 03:08 AM
-
#358
  1. HannoCometh
  2. Gingers are human too
  1. HannoCometh
  2. Gingers are human too
  3. Join Date: Apr 2019
  4. Posts: 18,566
  5. Rep Power: 9117
Originally Posted By Rajc
how am i a retard? it is literally a minor



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_(law)
SteCarrell is nuts, dude. He doesn't.l even understand the term "statutory rape". He doesn't understand that it doesn't matter what people think or feel or whether they are extremely "willing" and "enthusiastic" hahahahahaha
Battlefield 8 fan
Betelgeuse is coming Crew
Gliese 710 Crew
"Phytoandrogens are a thing, apparently..."
-Comments attributed to HannoCometh (2021)
β€’|PHYTOANDROGENS (discovered by Misc around March '21)|β€’
β€’β€’||02/22/22 - Acquired The Moncler Space Company, former subsidiary of Moncler S.p.A ded fkn srs
β€’β€’||02/24/22 - Honorary Director for life (USFS and USDOI Bureau of Land Management)
Aspiring Sasquatch Crew
Anti-soya Crew
Active service, War on Soya [2021-ongoing]
post 1624351351 12-03-2020, 03:17 AM
-
#359
  1. HannoCometh
  2. Gingers are human too
  1. HannoCometh
  2. Gingers are human too
  3. Join Date: Apr 2019
  4. Posts: 18,566
  5. Rep Power: 9117
Originally Posted By TomWanks
But the brah is trying
L
O
L
I totally agree, there are exceptions and clauses and mitigating factors, but in many jurisdictions, the law does tend to be harder on men than it is on women. For example, a harsher sentence/punishment would be dealt if the adult was a man and the child was a boy or a girl than if the adult was a woman and the child was a girl or boy (the seriousness probably also increases if penetration is involved, especially if both defendant and minor victim are male). In some states, in the US, it may be a misdemeanour, depending on the circumstances. Obviously there exceptions and mitigating factors, but the general rule is that it's generally statutory rape if the defendant is an adult over 18 and the "victim" is a minor under 18 or 16, even if the "victim", a minor, was "willing" and "enthusiastic". Obviously, the "law" and cops can't be everywhere all the time, but if folks are caught, they'll have to cross that bridge when they come to it...
Battlefield 8 fan
Betelgeuse is coming Crew
Gliese 710 Crew
"Phytoandrogens are a thing, apparently..."
-Comments attributed to HannoCometh (2021)
β€’|PHYTOANDROGENS (discovered by Misc around March '21)|β€’
β€’β€’||02/22/22 - Acquired The Moncler Space Company, former subsidiary of Moncler S.p.A ded fkn srs
β€’β€’||02/24/22 - Honorary Director for life (USFS and USDOI Bureau of Land Management)
Aspiring Sasquatch Crew
Anti-soya Crew
Active service, War on Soya [2021-ongoing]
post 1624351731 12-03-2020, 03:33 AM
-
#360
  1. Casca
  2. Registered User
  1. Casca
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2005
  4. Posts: 14,997
  5. Rep Power: 62013
Originally Posted By TomWanks
Disagree. She didn't do anything other sloot, which should be shamed of course-- but slooting is not a jailable offense yet unfortunately.
No you dipsht, that was a child. Any man that behaved that way toward any gender of that age will be in prisoned.
β˜†β˜†β˜†USA οΏ½ΡΡ”Ο‰β˜†β˜†β˜†


Not Casca Berserk. Casca The Eternal Soldier



β˜†β˜†β˜†Perfectly Imperfect οΏ½ΡΡ”Ο‰β˜†β˜†β˜†

β˜†β˜†β˜†What is the point of doing a bunch of reps if every rep you do is CRAP? οΏ½ΡΡ”Ο‰β˜†β˜†β˜†

β˜†β˜†β˜†SuperStraight οΏ½ΡΡ”Ο‰β˜†β˜†β˜†

β˜†β˜†β˜†snailsrus οΏ½ΡΡ”Ο‰β˜†β˜†β˜†

β˜†β˜†β˜†High Five οΏ½ΡΡ”Ο‰β˜†β˜†β˜†
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts