Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Cum dumpster mother of 3 phucks age 14 Chad while Timothy waits downstairs
  1. Results 481 to 510 of 519
  2. First
  3. 15
  4. 16
  5. 17
  6. 18
  7. Last
post 1624407181 12-03-2020, 03:30 PM
-
#481
  1. Gainzzz
  2. ayyy lmao
  1. Gainzzz
  2. ayyy lmao
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 20,465
  5. Rep Power: 155945
Originally Posted By CopeFear
Age of consent laws regarding gaol bate teenage sloots are set in stone to cuck the modern man into resisting natural biological urges and bend the knee in the gynocentric society he lives in.
1800s Britain was definitely gynocentric brah

Just accept the fact that a minority of men want to fuk young teenage girls (13/14). You are one. We have a few more on the misc who have posted ITT. Ok, whatever. Stop acting like ALL men want to fuk young teenage girls, because they don't.

Child lovers are probably the most hated group of people on the planet and it has nothing to do with being "gynocentric". It's because non-child lovers view it as an inherently disgusting thing. A father should have the right to murder any man who touches his underage daughter, tbh.
post 1624407861 12-03-2020, 03:38 PM
-
#482
  1. CopeFear
  2. Degenmaxxer
  1. CopeFear
  2. Degenmaxxer
  3. Join Date: Apr 2020
  4. Posts: 9,505
  5. Rep Power: 39017
Originally Posted By Gainzzz
1800s Britain was definitely gynocentric brah

Just accept the fact that a minority of men want to fuk young teenage girls (13/14). You are one. We have a few more on the misc who have posted ITT. Ok, whatever. Stop acting like ALL men want to fuk young teenage girls, because they don't.

Child lovers are probably the most hated group of people on the planet and it has nothing to do with being "gynocentric". It's because non-child lovers view it as an inherently disgusting thing. A father should have the right to murder any man who touches his underage daughter, tbh.
14yo sloots aren't "children". Neither is the 14yo Chad who boned the mum in the OP.

Calling teenagers "children" is cucked gynocentric propaganda.
Yellow Fever Crew
post 1624408861 12-03-2020, 03:50 PM
-
#483
  1. TypeNirvash
  2. World Warrior
  1. TypeNirvash
  2. World Warrior
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 23,195
  5. Rep Power: 26070
^I am sick and tired of you boyos calling society gynocentric while actually perpetuating the cycle

Thread is the epitome of enforcing the cycle

Youliterally cannotgo "oh yeah she deserves to get off scot free, I woulda boned her too!" after she was caught violating a law than a man would have been THRASHED for and then complain about a gynocentric society.

YouLITERALLY CANNOTcomplain about gynocentric society while paying for sex
post 1624409701 12-03-2020, 03:58 PM
-
#484
  1. CopeFear
  2. Degenmaxxer
  1. CopeFear
  2. Degenmaxxer
  3. Join Date: Apr 2020
  4. Posts: 9,505
  5. Rep Power: 39017
Originally Posted By TypeNirvash
^I am sick and tired of you boyos calling society gynocentric while actually perpetuating the cycle

Thread is the epitome of enforcing the cycle

Youliterally cannotgo "oh yeah she deserves to get off scot free, I woulda boned her too!" after she was caught violating a law than a man would have been THRASHED for and then complain about a gynocentric society.

YouLITERALLY CANNOTcomplain about gynocentric society while paying for sex
Gynocentric clown world means this sloot and other sloots get off with a slap on the wrist for fukking gaol bate. If a man did it, he would be getting beheaded in the village square come sunrise Sunday morning.

Personally I believe IF ITS CONSENTUAL there should be no punishment if a teenage and an adult fukk CONSENTUALLY.

Of course there would have to be proper due diligence done to prove if it was consentual or not. In this gynocentric clown world it's just "hey that's a CHILD it must be evil demonic RAPE!!!!!" JFL @ believing that's proper due diligence.
Yellow Fever Crew
post 1624409991 12-03-2020, 04:01 PM
-
#485
  1. Gainzzz
  2. ayyy lmao
  1. Gainzzz
  2. ayyy lmao
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 20,465
  5. Rep Power: 155945
Originally Posted By CopeFear
14yo sloots aren't "children". Neither is the 14yo Chad who boned the mum in the OP.

Calling teenagers "children" is cucked gynocentric propaganda.
According to you

Which is convenient, seeing as you want to fuk them

The vast majority of men, from all over the world, don't view 14 year olds as potential sexual partners
The top countries with the youngest first-time mums:

1. Angola (18)

2. Bangladesh and Niger (18.10)

3. Chad (18.20)

4. Mali (18.60)

5. Guinea, Uganda, Mozambique and Malawi (18.90)

6. Liberia, Gaza Strip, Botswana and Sierra Leone (19)

7. Zambia (19.20)

8. Sao Tome and Principe and Burkina Faso (19.40)

9. Cabo Verde, Madagascar and Swaziland (19.50)

10. Tanzania and Ethiopia (19.60)
Even the least "gynocentric" countries in the world have age of consent laws

Even in the depths of Africa where contraception is viewed as a joke we don't see millions of 13/14 year old mothers (I'm not saying it doesn't happen at all, of course it does)

But if what you are saying is true, that deep down all men desire 13/14 year old puzzy but have been cucked by our gynocentric cultures, we would see it in a place where women are viewed as not much more than a fleshlight and contraception basically doesn't exist
post 1624410161 12-03-2020, 04:03 PM
-
#486
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 18,531
  6. Rep Power: 75714
Originally Posted By TypeNirvash
^I am sick and tired of you boyos calling society gynocentric while actually perpetuating the cycle

Thread is the epitome of enforcing the cycle

Youliterally cannotgo "oh yeah she deserves to get off scot free, I woulda boned her too!" after she was caught violating a law than a man would have been THRASHED for and then complain about a gynocentric society.
Not sure what you mean here. I have read most and skimmed some of the repetition ITT.

As far as I can see the people you are talking to when saying the quoted above have the stance that a 14yo old boy and a 14yo girl are =/=
Control group crew membership revoked 7/5/2022 1:50pm PST not proud.

Inb4 honorable FDA/CDC/NIH/WHO representatives

J.L.C,
NextPound,
mgftp,
SillieBazzillie.
post 1624410541 12-03-2020, 04:07 PM
-
#487
  1. CopeFear
  2. Degenmaxxer
  1. CopeFear
  2. Degenmaxxer
  3. Join Date: Apr 2020
  4. Posts: 9,505
  5. Rep Power: 39017
Originally Posted By Gainzzz
According to you

Which is convenient, seeing as you want to fuk them

The vast majority of men, from all over the world, don't view 14 year olds as potential sexual partners



Even the least "gynocentric" countries in the world have age of consent laws

Even in the depths of Africa where contraception is viewed as a joke we don't see millions of 13/14 year old mothers (I'm not saying it doesn't happen at all, of course it does)

But if what you are saying is true, that deep down all men desire 13/14 year old puzzy but have been cucked by our gynocentric cultures, we would see it in a place where women are viewed as not much more than a fleshlight and contraception basically doesn't exist
Even if men view teenage sloots as potential sexual partners, they'll never admit it. Because society will shun them and their friends and family will disown them because everyone has been brainwashed into believing teenagers are children.

I don't know how cucked your home town/city is atm due to the plandemic but when malls are open again I want you to go run a test.

Go to the mall and when you see gaol bate or "children", walking around in daisy dukes or leggings observe the men around them. I guaran fukking tee that you'll see adult aged men leering or trying to leer in a very low key manner.

Anyone who tries to deny this is either a non-fiction ******* or a eunich.

The test can be done at the local swimming pool or the beach. Any of the bluepilled gyno brainwashed cucks ITT can go and see what observations they find.
Yellow Fever Crew
post 1624411971 12-03-2020, 04:22 PM
-
#488
  1. LooksMaximus
  2. Banned
  1. LooksMaximus
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2019
  4. Posts: 3,931
  5. Rep Power: 0
The age of lawful consent to a marriage was 12 for girls and 14 for boys. Most Roman women seem to have married in their late teens to early twenties, but noble women married younger than those of the lower classes, and an aristocratic girl was expected to be virgin until her first marriage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_in_ancient_Rome
Black-pilled androcentric Caesar lawmogging blue-pilled gynocentric eunuch:




JFL
post 1624412301 12-03-2020, 04:25 PM
-
#489
  1. TypeNirvash
  2. World Warrior
  1. TypeNirvash
  2. World Warrior
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 23,195
  5. Rep Power: 26070
Originally Posted By Rajc
?? the only issue here is the price, in a androgenic society there would still be prostitution, however the price would be much much lower
How do you figure? You are paying for sex, because a female's sex is more valuable than a male's sex.
Originally Posted By Joseph1990
Not sure what you mean here. I have read most and skimmed some of the repetition ITT.

As far as I can see the people you are talking to when saying the quoted above have the stance that a 14yo old boy and a 14yo girl are =/=
The difference creates the gynocentrism they complain about. It's the whole reason this lady gets off scot free, when a man would be completely crucified.
Originally Posted By CopeFear
Gynocentric clown world means this sloot and other sloots get off with a slap on the wrist for fukking gaol bate. If a man did it, he would be getting beheaded in the village square come sunrise Sunday morning.

Personally I believe IF ITS CONSENTUAL there should be no punishment if a teenage and an adult fukk CONSENTUALLY.

Of course there would have to be proper due diligence done to prove if it was consentual or not. In this gynocentric clown world it's just "hey that's a CHILD it must be evil demonic RAPE!!!!!" JFL @ believing that's proper due diligence.
Dude let's be real, if you're fukking 14 year olds you're fukked in the head. Male or female.

Let's not beat around the bush about it. That's not gynocentrism, that's just the truth.

You really can't talk about gynocentrism when your whole schtick is literallypeak gynocentrism.
post 1624414811 12-03-2020, 04:50 PM
-
#490
  1. Gainzzz
  2. ayyy lmao
  1. Gainzzz
  2. ayyy lmao
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 20,465
  5. Rep Power: 155945
Originally Posted By CopeFear
Even if men view teenage sloots as potential sexual partners, they'll never admit it. Because society will shun them and their friends and family will disown them because everyone has been brainwashed into believing teenagers are children.

I don't know how cucked your home town/city is atm due to the plandemic but when malls are open again I want you to go run a test.

Go to the mall and when you see gaol bate or "children", walking around in daisy dukes or leggings observe the men around them. I guaran fukking tee that you'll see adult aged men leering or trying to leer in a very low key manner.

Anyone who tries to deny this is either a non-fiction ******* or a eunich.

The test can be done at the local swimming pool or the beach. Any of the bluepilled gyno brainwashed cucks ITT can go and see what observations they find.
I've given you an example of how what you're saying isn't true tho.

You're blaming men not wanting to fuk 14 year olds on "our gynocentric culture brainwashing us into believing teenagers are children". Yet men from the least gynocentric countries on the planet are not choosing 13/14 year olds to have sex with. Why? Because they do not view girls of this age as sexually mature enough. Why? Because they are children, physically and mentally.
post 1624415311 12-03-2020, 04:54 PM
-
#491
  1. District
  2. tcirtsiD
  1. District
  2. tcirtsiD
  3. Join Date: Oct 2010
  4. Age: 33
  5. Posts: 11,193
  6. Rep Power: 18538
Nothing is true. Everything is permitted.
post 1624423161 12-03-2020, 06:23 PM
-
#492
  1. CopeFear
  2. Degenmaxxer
  1. CopeFear
  2. Degenmaxxer
  3. Join Date: Apr 2020
  4. Posts: 9,505
  5. Rep Power: 39017
Originally Posted By TypeNirvash
Dude let's be real, if you're fukking 14 year olds you're fukked in the head. Male or female.

Let's not beat around the bush about it. That's not gynocentrism, that's just the truth.

You really can't talk about gynocentrism when your whole schtick is literallypeak gynocentrism.
So is a 17yo brah "fukked in the head" for wanting to or actually fukking a 14yo sloot? What about a 16yo brah? Or 18yo brah?

What about a 15yo brah? Remember if he takes a photo of his 14yo sloot, he is a ped0 in possession of cheese pizza. According to "society" and the "law".

Everyone is so warped by these "oh so that that you are 18 years and 0 days old you are a MAN" but 2mins ago at 11:59pm when you were 17 years and 364 days old, "his just a little boy". JFL.

So let's assume you say it's okay for a 17yo brah to fukk a 14yo, why can't a 19yo do so? Does he become a low test cucked eunich with each passing day? JFL.

It's nothing more than societal propaganda.

It's just like how the western world has no issue with man on man sex and marriage, but marrying cousins? FUKKING SICK BASTARDS!!!!!

Now go to Saudi Arabia, marrying cousins is A-OK and man on man love is HARAM!!!!!

These laws are doing nothing but trying to cuck and demonise natural biological urges humans have. Whether they are *******s, incestcels or wanting to dick down a teenage sloot.
Yellow Fever Crew
post 1624428911 12-03-2020, 07:22 PM
-
#493
  1. hotsaucebrah
  2. Registered User
  1. hotsaucebrah
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2014
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 14,666
  6. Rep Power: 12336
Originally Posted By Ahhdonbilivit
Imagine being 14 and having this happen to you. Shes hot aswell. I wanna see what he looked like

Why did the Timothy wait downstairs like a beta, should have joined in
No she isn't
No Glow, No Go Crew

*Cries about negs* Crew
post 1624446721 12-03-2020, 11:16 PM
-
#494
  1. TypeNirvash
  2. World Warrior
  1. TypeNirvash
  2. World Warrior
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 23,195
  5. Rep Power: 26070
Originally Posted By CopeFear
So is a 17yo brah "fukked in the head" for wanting to or actually fukking a 14yo sloot? What about a 16yo brah? Or 18yo brah?

What about a 15yo brah? Remember if he takes a photo of his 14yo sloot, he is a ped0 in possession of cheese pizza. According to "society" and the "law".

Everyone is so warped by these "oh so that that you are 18 years and 0 days old you are a MAN" but 2mins ago at 11:59pm when you were 17 years and 364 days old, "his just a little boy". JFL.

So let's assume you say it's okay for a 17yo brah to fukk a 14yo, why can't a 19yo do so? Does he become a low test cucked eunich with each passing day? JFL.

It's nothing more than societal propaganda.

It's just like how the western world has no issue with man on man sex and marriage, but marrying cousins? FUKKING SICK BASTARDS!!!!!

Now go to Saudi Arabia, marrying cousins is A-OK and man on man love is HARAM!!!!!

These laws are doing nothing but trying to cuck and demonise natural biological urges humans have. Whether they are *******s, incestcels or wanting to dick down a teenage sloot.
I wasn't using the royal you...

I was talking about you, ya fukkin idiot

We aren't talking grey areas, we are talking about grown ass adults like you and me. Don't sperg out on me, all you gotta say is "I wouldn't fuk a 14 year old" or "I would" and we'll call it a fukkin' day
post 1624447181 12-03-2020, 11:23 PM
-
#495
  1. Coal Man
  2. snailsrus
  1. Coal Man
  2. snailsrus
  3. Join Date: Jul 2006
  4. Posts: 56,588
  5. Rep Power: 653846
Originally Posted By CopeFear
So is a 17yo brah "fukked in the head" for wanting to or actually fukking a 14yo sloot? What about a 16yo brah? Or 18yo brah?

What about a 15yo brah? Remember if he takes a photo of his 14yo sloot, he is a ped0 in possession of cheese pizza. According to "society" and the "law".

Everyone is so warped by these "oh so that that you are 18 years and 0 days old you are a MAN" but 2mins ago at 11:59pm when you were 17 years and 364 days old, "his just a little boy". JFL.

So let's assume you say it's okay for a 17yo brah to fukk a 14yo, why can't a 19yo do so? Does he become a low test cucked eunich with each passing day? JFL.

It's nothing more than societal propaganda.

It's just like how the western world has no issue with man on man sex and marriage, but marrying cousins? FUKKING SICK BASTARDS!!!!!

Now go to Saudi Arabia, marrying cousins is A-OK and man on man love is HARAM!!!!!

These laws are doing nothing but trying to cuck and demonise natural biological urges humans have. Whether they are *******s, incestcels or wanting to dick down a teenage sloot.
What is this post. I can't even begin to translate it into English.

CF I've never addressed you before 1v1 but you give off serious troll vibes my guy.

I see a guy like LooksMaximus and where you guys share many of the same ideas, I can at least understand his line of logic. Even though I don't agree with him, he has a fairly nuanced view of the world. I respect LM and we get along fine.

Meanwhile, you're on the extreme side of things, it's genuinely creepy man.

To anyone reading this, if you have to follow someone's ideals, please just follow LM, and don't just assume his followers are as mentally stable as him.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
......................
post 1624469861 12-04-2020, 08:01 AM
-
#496
  1. TypeNirvash
  2. World Warrior
  1. TypeNirvash
  2. World Warrior
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 23,195
  5. Rep Power: 26070
Originally Posted By Rajc
huh wtf? no because i am not a homosexual and have basic needs (sex is a basic need according to the maslow pyramid)
Not classically, no, this is a common misconception. Classifying sex as a basic need would justify rape. For example, you'd be justified in killing for food, because you need it to survive.

In that same way, you'd be allowed to forcefully have sex with somebody withholding it from you. This is directly conflicting with the base need for security and safety in the heirarchy.

Classifying it as a basic need is wholly incorrect. You will die from starvation, the same will not happen from lack of sex.

But that being said, not being homosexual is not party to your paying for sex. You have adesireto have sex, and you pay to have that desire fulfilled.

DesireandNEEDare on wholly different scales. If merely the gratification of that sexual desire is that important, masturbation would suffice. However, it is not the mere desire for the gratification of that sexual interest. It's actually the desire tohave sex WITH women, and therefore women must be part and party to your action.

Your contract is such that your desire to have sex with women has dominion over your life in such a way that you believe you should be paying them for it in some way or another.
Originally Posted By Rajc
the low prices for prostitution actually makes it androcentric, because then every pleb can easily afford it all the time, whenever the urge arises
I don't exactly agree with this, it sounds more like this is skewed toward your mentality as opposed to what would actually happen.
post 1624485331 12-04-2020, 10:43 AM
-
#497
  1. TypeNirvash
  2. World Warrior
  1. TypeNirvash
  2. World Warrior
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 23,195
  5. Rep Power: 26070
Originally Posted By Rajc
not sure if you realized but we live in a civilization, civilizations exist exactly to not become a full feral human
Absolutely zero of your post was an argument about how sex was a basic need or a counter argument to my point.

I never argued thata desireto have sex was unnatural.

Buying food for your employees is not an illustration of food as a basic need with which to base your argument for sex as a basic need. Nor is purchasing prostitutes for them, in hopes that they may produce additional profit. Both of these things are classified as luxuries, and a luxury is not necessary to survival.

Sure, food is a basic need. But employee lunches are not.

We may live in a society, but that society is predicated on the satisfaction of basic needsnot luxuries. If your employer was providing you lunches weekly, and you killed him over those lunches you would only be justified if your employer was your only source of food. Furtheryou wouldn't be justified if you could simply find another employer instead. Your example is mostly without real substance.

Your argument is one of a decadent society who no longer understands it's own basic need structure.

Sex is a desire and nobody is under any obligation to fulfill it for you. Most people are not even under any obligation to provide to you, your basic needs. You are expected, and required to fulfill those on your own.

Thusly your application of Maslow is also mostly without merit, substance or relevance anyway.
post 1624486621 12-04-2020, 10:57 AM
-
#498
  1. ChriisGayle
  2. Banned
  1. ChriisGayle
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 92
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By TypeNirvash
Dude let's be real, if you're fukking 14 year olds you're fukked in the head. Male or female.
Let's not beat around the bush about it. That's not gynocentrism, that's just the truth.
wrong. being in a relationship is creepy. but smashing? i've smashed some whores that i wud bet my life weren't 19. a few were pimped..........a few were independent.
post 1624487671 12-04-2020, 11:10 AM
-
#499
  1. TypeNirvash
  2. World Warrior
  1. TypeNirvash
  2. World Warrior
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 23,195
  5. Rep Power: 26070
Originally Posted By ChriisGayle
wrong. being in a relationship is creepy. but smashing? i've smashed some whores that i wud bet my life weren't 19. a few were pimped..........a few were independent.
You're a red on the misc who has self admitted to having sex with underage women mostly knowingly thanks for proving my point
post 1624487921 12-04-2020, 11:13 AM
-
#500
  1. ChriisGayle
  2. Banned
  1. ChriisGayle
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 92
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By TypeNirvash
You're a red on the misc who has self admitted to having sex with underage women mostly knowingly thanks for proving my point
some dudes in the government made up numbers. 16 here, 18 there, 19 somewhere else, 14 in this other area. and that determines our morality. sounds stupid imo.
post 1624495421 12-04-2020, 12:30 PM
-
#501
  1. Zackad
  2. Keanu Reeves Checking In
  1. Zackad
  2. Keanu Reeves Checking In
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: California, Uganda
  5. Posts: 25,380
  6. Rep Power: 219281
my fukkin god


Ignoring the posters ITT with obviously questionable morals, Do you *******s arguing not realize you're arguing two different things? One side is arguing the naturality of sexual attraction to physically developed individuals regardless of age (perfectly natural), while the other side is arguing the morals/ethics/societal conventions centered around underage (As determined by law) sexual encounters. you can support both, they don't have to be mutually exclusive if you have an ounce of reason and logic.

Teacher should be charged due to the law, as Nirvash said, she could have smashed anyone else, and IMO it's the responsibility of anyone to be sure they can legally sleep with the person they're about to take to pound town. DGAF how old they look, or don't. It's something I verify with anyone I smash.

That being said, i don't entirely believe that the kid was "raped" or "uncomfortable" like the story states, and am more inclined to believe he's being pushed as a victim because of the legality, not because he he was an actual victim of rape.
"So t
post 1624742831 12-07-2020, 06:37 AM
-
#502
  1. Chump1987
  2. Registered User
  1. Chump1987
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2007
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 2,328
  7. Rep Power: 20607
Bumping this thread because

Wait for it...








"UK mom cleared after having sex with boy, 14, reportedly plans to make OnlyFans"

"I’m thinking about doing an OnlyFans account. People already hate me, so not much to lose,”



Yep its the same person

https://nypost.com/2020/12/07/mom-cl...rce=NYPTwitter


Man does this and his entire life is ruined (and rightfully so). A woman does and becomes a future millionaire

Just when you think the degeneracy can't get worse lmao
The more i learn about people, the more i like my dog.
post 1624743301 12-07-2020, 06:46 AM
-
#503
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Strong as phuck bump. Repped.

Never was there clearer insight into the mind of slootkind than this self-fulfiling prophecy.
“I’m thinking about doing an OnlyFans account. People already hate me, so not much to lose.”


The misc will assuredly simp for her.
post 1624751381 12-07-2020, 08:52 AM
-
#504
  1. Procta
  1. Procta
  2. Join Date: Feb 2006
  3. Location: Jacksonville, Florida, United States
  4. Posts: 132,775
  5. Subscribers: 8
  6. Rep Power: 1752012
lmao @ making onlyfans

**** rapists can still get paid
Subscribe for extra premium content (no noodz sorry guys)
post 1624752411 12-07-2020, 09:03 AM
-
#505
  1. cool-beans
  2. Registered User
  1. cool-beans
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 40
  6. Posts: 1,093
  7. Rep Power: 2050
how was she cleared? im confused.
post 1624752931 12-07-2020, 09:08 AM
-
#506
  1. BraneyGumble
  2. Registered User
  1. BraneyGumble
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2013
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 25,426
  6. Rep Power: 248871
Originally Posted By cool-beans
how was she cleared? im confused.
Your Honor, in my defense he said he was 16.

Understandable. Case dismissed, have a nice day. Cheerio!
post 1624754171 12-07-2020, 09:21 AM
-
#507
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By cool-beans
how was she cleared? im confused.
Presumption of innocence still applies to demon sloots.
post 1624758301 12-07-2020, 10:04 AM
-
#508
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
In for feminist misc to explain the justice system to me.
post 1624766271 12-07-2020, 11:15 AM
-
#509
  1. Ken-O
  2. Usuario registrado
  1. Ken-O
  2. Usuario registrado
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: Chihuahua, Mexico
  5. Posts: 41,198
  6. Rep Power: 243727
Originally Posted By Chump1987
Bumping this thread because

Wait for it...








"UK mom cleared after having sex with boy, 14, reportedly plans to make OnlyFans"

"I’m thinking about doing an OnlyFans account. People already hate me, so not much to lose,”



Yep its the same person

https://nypost.com/2020/12/07/mom-cl...rce=NYPTwitter


Man does this and his entire life is ruined (and rightfully so). A woman does and becomes a future millionaire

Just when you think the degeneracy can't get worse lmao
Feel bad for her kids. I really do.
"The flowers bloom, then wither... The stars shine and one day become extinct. This earth, the sun, the galaxies and even the big universe, someday will be destroyed. Compared with that, the human life is only a blink, just a little time. In that short time - people are born, laugh, cry, fight, are injured, feel joy, sadness, hate someone, love someone. All in just a moment. And then, are embraced by the eternal sleep called death."
post 1624766321 12-07-2020, 11:16 AM
-
#510
  1. userO1ROTHKVUIA
  2. Lemon_Squeezer
  1. userO1ROTHKVUIA
  2. Lemon_Squeezer
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 3,090
  5. Rep Power: 12126
Originally Posted By BraneyGumble
Your Honor, in my defense he said he was 16.

Understandable. Case dismissed, have a nice day. Cheerio!
We actually call Judges M’Lord or M’Lady in UK lol just like the fedoras but otherwise bang on
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts