Forum
»
Moon Landing 1969 Real or Fake?
Thread: Moon Landing 1969 Real or Fake?
12-08-2020, 06:33 PM
-
#301
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
The funniest part about the no stars argument is that these people are claiming the US government was clever enough to pull off the most elaborate hoax in history while at the same time being dumb enough to forget to include stars in the fake pictures (if they were supposed to be there).I mean, this is basic knowledge, you'd think they would want to look it up.
Nope, they just want to spout nonsense that has no sources.
Nope, they just want to spout nonsense that has no sources.
S/B/D—185/165/205 (sumo w/ straps)
12-08-2020, 06:37 PM
-
#302
- brumbleman
- Registered User
-
- brumbleman
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Posts: 835
- Rep Power: 2967
-
-
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
6 manned missions in 3.5 years, total.No. And this does not change the fact we’ve been to the moon.
Nothing up there, though...
Mesomorph, large frame, natty trainer.
12-08-2020, 06:47 PM
-
#303
12-08-2020, 06:57 PM
-
#304
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By brumbleman⏩
Not sure I understand the post, but there is stuff up there left from the Apollo missions, just can’t see it with a telescope on earth.6 manned missions in 3.5 years, total.
Nothing up there, though...
Nothing up there, though...
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
12-08-2020, 07:01 PM
-
#305
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
-
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
- Join Date: May 2011
- Posts: 606
- Rep Power: 1607
-
-
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
It's backed by so many discrepancies that can't be refuted. That's why all of the pro moon landing guys here resort to calling names and assuming the high ground, they can't refute what's been presented so its basically "source: just trust me bro. ur an idiot". That's not getting us anywhere.Misc is funny sometimes (not saying the below are universal by any means, and there are indeed rational posters ITT among the nonsense, but the below just seems to be a trend).
-Paranormal, ghosts, etc? heck yea; no skepticism.
-Spirits, demons, etc? heck yea, no skepticism
-God, miracles, NDE religious experiences, etc? no skepticism
-Universe is a giant simulation? no skepticism
-UFOs and aliens flying around the sky? No skepticism....some grainy (debunked) military footage is all that’s needed, case closed.
Moon landings, well documented history, not supernatural, backed by vast evidence? SKEPTICAL TO THE MAX!
(could also replace moon landings here with something like biological evolution). Contrast is hilarious.
-Paranormal, ghosts, etc? heck yea; no skepticism.
-Spirits, demons, etc? heck yea, no skepticism
-God, miracles, NDE religious experiences, etc? no skepticism
-Universe is a giant simulation? no skepticism
-UFOs and aliens flying around the sky? No skepticism....some grainy (debunked) military footage is all that’s needed, case closed.
Moon landings, well documented history, not supernatural, backed by vast evidence? SKEPTICAL TO THE MAX!
(could also replace moon landings here with something like biological evolution). Contrast is hilarious.
I don't know if we did or didn't go at all, I do know that the footage and some of (if not all) the photos were faked.
I totally believe that we sent a rover there. I do believe that. I'll give them that much.
What I don't believe, is that those men walked on the surface of the moon.
There's just too much evidence to say otherwise, and too many discrepancies for me to fully commit to the suspension of disbelief. I'm too analytical, I pay too much attention to detail and I know those men, after the fact, didn't have the correct body language or behaviors. From NASA "losing the technology", to the moon rocks ending up not being moon rocks at all, all the obviously edited photos that were passed off as real.
I liken it to the wrestling business. To a degree, it's real as it can be. There are people who make sure the show goes on. Brilliant minds coming together to achieve a common goal. There's just one caveat, it's a work. They're actually taking lumps out there (they're actually sending a craft to the moon) but it's choreographed and the winner is decided beforehand (those men didn't actually walk the surface, but we did get a craft there)
There was plenty of incentive for the US to fake sending humans on the moon, and it could have been done so easily, considering they actually got a craft there.
U aware?
12-08-2020, 07:03 PM
-
#306
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
-
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
- Join Date: May 2011
- Posts: 606
- Rep Power: 1607
-
-
Originally Posted By Scottybby⏩
Nope.Am I able to look through a telescope rn at the moon and see evidence we've been there?
(just asking)
(just asking)
U aware?
12-08-2020, 07:08 PM
-
#307
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By BroIncorporated⏩
You aren’t being too analytical here at all....you are just trying to repeat addressed-to-death hoaxer talking points (lost technology, fake moon rock, etc), betraying that in fact you’ve barely looked into any of this beyond a superficial level. Many of these items were addressed in this very thread.It's backed by so many discrepancies that can't be refuted. That's why all of the pro moon landing guys here resort to calling names and assuming the high ground, they can't refute what's been presented so its basically "source: just trust me bro. ur an idiot". That's not getting us anywhere.
I don't know if we did or didn't go at all, I do know that the footage and some of (if not all) the photos were faked.
I totally believe that we sent a rover there. I do believe that. I'll give them that much.
What I don't believe, is that those men walked on the surface of the moon.
There's just too much evidence to say otherwise, and too many discrepancies for me to fully commit to the suspension of disbelief. I'm too analytical, I pay too much attention to detail and I know those men, after the fact, didn't have the correct body language or behaviors. From NASA "losing the technology", to the moon rocks ending up not being moon rocks at all, all the obviously edited photos that were passed off as real.
I liken it to the wrestling business. To a degree, it's real as it can be. There are people who make sure the show goes on. Brilliant minds coming together to achieve a common goal. There's just one caveat, it's a work. They're actually taking lumps out there (they're actually sending a craft to the moon) but it's choreographed and the winner is decided beforehand (those men didn't actually walk the surface, but we did get a craft there)
There was plenty of incentive for the US to fake sending humans on the moon, and it could have been done so easily, considering they actually got a craft there.
I don't know if we did or didn't go at all, I do know that the footage and some of (if not all) the photos were faked.
I totally believe that we sent a rover there. I do believe that. I'll give them that much.
What I don't believe, is that those men walked on the surface of the moon.
There's just too much evidence to say otherwise, and too many discrepancies for me to fully commit to the suspension of disbelief. I'm too analytical, I pay too much attention to detail and I know those men, after the fact, didn't have the correct body language or behaviors. From NASA "losing the technology", to the moon rocks ending up not being moon rocks at all, all the obviously edited photos that were passed off as real.
I liken it to the wrestling business. To a degree, it's real as it can be. There are people who make sure the show goes on. Brilliant minds coming together to achieve a common goal. There's just one caveat, it's a work. They're actually taking lumps out there (they're actually sending a craft to the moon) but it's choreographed and the winner is decided beforehand (those men didn't actually walk the surface, but we did get a craft there)
There was plenty of incentive for the US to fake sending humans on the moon, and it could have been done so easily, considering they actually got a craft there.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
12-08-2020, 07:10 PM
-
#308
Originally Posted By BroIncorporated⏩
So you believe that the people who were apparently competent enough to pull of a hoax involving hundreds of thousands of people were also simultaneously incompetent enough to release “obviously edited” photos?It's backed by so many discrepancies that can't be refuted. That's why all of the pro moon landing guys here resort to calling names and assuming the high ground, they can't refute what's been presented so its basically "source: just trust me bro. ur an idiot". That's not getting us anywhere.
I don't know if we did or didn't go at all, I do know that the footage and some of (if not all) the photos were faked.
I totally believe that we sent a rover there. I do believe that. I'll give them that much.
What I don't believe, is that those men walked on the surface of the moon.
There's just too much evidence to say otherwise, and too many discrepancies for me to fully commit to the suspension of disbelief. I'm too analytical, I pay too much attention to detail and I know those men, after the fact, didn't have the correct body language or behaviors. From NASA "losing the technology", to the moon rocks ending up not being moon rocks at all, all the obviously edited photos that were passed off as real.
I liken it to the wrestling business. To a degree, it's real as it can be. There are people who make sure the show goes on. Brilliant minds coming together to achieve a common goal. There's just one caveat, it's a work. They're actually taking lumps out there (they're actually sending a craft to the moon) but it's choreographed and the winner is decided beforehand (those men didn't actually walk the surface, but we did get a craft there)
There was plenty of incentive for the US to fake sending humans on the moon, and it could have been done so easily, considering they actually got a craft there.
I don't know if we did or didn't go at all, I do know that the footage and some of (if not all) the photos were faked.
I totally believe that we sent a rover there. I do believe that. I'll give them that much.
What I don't believe, is that those men walked on the surface of the moon.
There's just too much evidence to say otherwise, and too many discrepancies for me to fully commit to the suspension of disbelief. I'm too analytical, I pay too much attention to detail and I know those men, after the fact, didn't have the correct body language or behaviors. From NASA "losing the technology", to the moon rocks ending up not being moon rocks at all, all the obviously edited photos that were passed off as real.
I liken it to the wrestling business. To a degree, it's real as it can be. There are people who make sure the show goes on. Brilliant minds coming together to achieve a common goal. There's just one caveat, it's a work. They're actually taking lumps out there (they're actually sending a craft to the moon) but it's choreographed and the winner is decided beforehand (those men didn't actually walk the surface, but we did get a craft there)
There was plenty of incentive for the US to fake sending humans on the moon, and it could have been done so easily, considering they actually got a craft there.
S/B/D—185/165/205 (sumo w/ straps)
12-08-2020, 07:12 PM
-
#309
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By BroIncorporated⏩
People in ancient Greece couldn’t see atoms, or biological cells. There was no technology available to enable them to see those entities.Nope.
This fact has no relevance to whether atoms and cells exist (they do in fact).
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
12-08-2020, 07:18 PM
-
#310
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Lol oh right...that’sthe reason we can’t see those Apollo artifacts.Apparently the Apollo missions landed on the far side of the moon as posted earlier ITT.
edit: to the above poster, explained more simply
-If we never went to the moon, you wouldn’t be able to see the artifacts with telescopes.
-If we went to the moon, you wouldn’t be able to see the artifacts with telescopes.
Now given you can’t see the artifacts with a telescope...hmm what can we then conclude? nothing.
However, based on all kinds of other available evidence, it’s not difficult to understand we went to the moon.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
12-08-2020, 07:32 PM
-
#311
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
If my posts are all over the place, they please argue it out, pussy.TheAdlerian’s posts are a mess and all over the place as usual, but the blueprint thing, whatever this is even referring to, also does not have implication for the fact Apollo went to moon. The evidence we did go to the moon is vast, some of which is linked above.
The blueprint thing
-this mysterious story is not substantiated. There is all kinds of blueprints and documentation of Saturn V still on microfilm and in storage, per NASA.
-There are multiple examples of full, original Saturn V’s on literal display in museums
-No one is trying to build, or would want to build a full saturn v nowadays using 60s technology and parts, requiring 60’s infrastructure among other things, that’s not how it works.
The blueprint thing
-this mysterious story is not substantiated. There is all kinds of blueprints and documentation of Saturn V still on microfilm and in storage, per NASA.
-There are multiple examples of full, original Saturn V’s on literal display in museums
-No one is trying to build, or would want to build a full saturn v nowadays using 60s technology and parts, requiring 60’s infrastructure among other things, that’s not how it works.
But you can't so instead of saying something directly to me, like a bitch, you talk about me, but never confront me.
I haven't said ONE wacky thing in this thread.
About the plans:
NASA admitted to losing the plans, and mentioned in this discussion and now the press releases are deleted by NASA.
https://ask.metafilter.com/89955/Why...5-rocket-plans
This is a discussion about NASA SAYING there are blueprints but for people who have seen them, they don't really say anything. They are like Part A goes into Part B.
https://space.stackexchange.com/ques...lans-destroyed
Here is a NEW YORK TIMES article for 1987 saying THERE ARE NO PLANS.
https://www.nytimes.com/1987/05/26/s...on-rocket.html
It says what I have been saying REPEATEDLY that the US government, that keeps thousand page documents on the private lives of celebrities, let NASA THROW TOGETHER the moon rocket, with no control, no documentation, and they let them throw all the stuff away, and sell it for scrap, after the most amazing adventure and technological event in the history of humanity.
But, we know with which hand Martin Luther King wiped his ass with.
Meanwhile, like some expert on retardation, you're like, :day have microfilm n stuff, and indubitably my conclusions are self-evident".
You can't even bother to look sh!t up.
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
12-08-2020, 07:36 PM
-
#312
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By BroIncorporated⏩
What you're saying is what I think.It's backed by so many discrepancies that can't be refuted. That's why all of the pro moon landing guys here resort to calling names and assuming the high ground, they can't refute what's been presented so its basically "source: just trust me bro. ur an idiot". That's not getting us anywhere.
I don't know if we did or didn't go at all, I do know that the footage and some of (if not all) the photos were faked.
I totally believe that we sent a rover there. I do believe that. I'll give them that much.
What I don't believe, is that those men walked on the surface of the moon.
There's just too much evidence to say otherwise, and too many discrepancies for me to fully commit to the suspension of disbelief. I'm too analytical, I pay too much attention to detail and I know those men, after the fact, didn't have the correct body language or behaviors. From NASA "losing the technology", to the moon rocks ending up not being moon rocks at all, all the obviously edited photos that were passed off as real.
I liken it to the wrestling business. To a degree, it's real as it can be. There are people who make sure the show goes on. Brilliant minds coming together to achieve a common goal. There's just one caveat, it's a work. They're actually taking lumps out there (they're actually sending a craft to the moon) but it's choreographed and the winner is decided beforehand (those men didn't actually walk the surface, but we did get a craft there)
There was plenty of incentive for the US to fake sending humans on the moon, and it could have been done so easily, considering they actually got a craft there.
I don't know if we did or didn't go at all, I do know that the footage and some of (if not all) the photos were faked.
I totally believe that we sent a rover there. I do believe that. I'll give them that much.
What I don't believe, is that those men walked on the surface of the moon.
There's just too much evidence to say otherwise, and too many discrepancies for me to fully commit to the suspension of disbelief. I'm too analytical, I pay too much attention to detail and I know those men, after the fact, didn't have the correct body language or behaviors. From NASA "losing the technology", to the moon rocks ending up not being moon rocks at all, all the obviously edited photos that were passed off as real.
I liken it to the wrestling business. To a degree, it's real as it can be. There are people who make sure the show goes on. Brilliant minds coming together to achieve a common goal. There's just one caveat, it's a work. They're actually taking lumps out there (they're actually sending a craft to the moon) but it's choreographed and the winner is decided beforehand (those men didn't actually walk the surface, but we did get a craft there)
There was plenty of incentive for the US to fake sending humans on the moon, and it could have been done so easily, considering they actually got a craft there.
The moon landing is some kind of truth/lie combo.
I don't believe that what was said to be done there was actually done.
That is why we have the "Earth Rocks" and the entire things is downplayed massively. Also, the whole idea that no one has gone there from other countries and even has trouble landing probes, which is only being done now, half a century later, is odd.
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
12-08-2020, 08:15 PM
-
#313
- brumbleman
- Registered User
-
- brumbleman
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Posts: 835
- Rep Power: 2967
-
-
Originally Posted By nm1891⏩
Oak Ridge manufactured Uranium for the A-bomb with a minimum of 75,000 people, mostly in a comparmentalized manner. Still, they hired in a Russian spy. **** can happen.So you believe that the people who were apparently competent enough to pull of a hoax involving hundreds of thousands of people were also simultaneously incompetent enough to release “obviously edited” photos?
https://science.howstuffworks.com/oa...tomic-city.htm
NASA does admit it runs their photos through filters, fyi.
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_841187
https://www.slashgear.com/adobe-deta...otos-29407147/
Mesomorph, large frame, natty trainer.
12-08-2020, 08:19 PM
-
#314
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I literally don't even know what you think you are trying to say.And once again, two out of three sources you posted confirm the opposite of your statement, and I didn't bother checking the third after that.
To the gentleman that called out the "pro moon landing " people... this is exhibit "A" of the CT crew being intellectually dishonest and calling people idiots.
Edit : and I am still waiting on the source of said statement.
To the gentleman that called out the "pro moon landing " people... this is exhibit "A" of the CT crew being intellectually dishonest and calling people idiots.
Edit : and I am still waiting on the source of said statement.
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
12-08-2020, 08:43 PM
-
#315
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Reread the three points in my post you quoted: none of them have changed.If my posts are all over the place, they please argue it out, pussy.
But you can't so instead of saying something directly to me, like a bitch, you talk about me, but never confront me.
I haven't said ONE wacky thing in this thread.
About the plans:
NASA admitted to losing the plans, and mentioned in this discussion and now the press releases are deleted by NASA.
https://ask.metafilter.com/89955/Why...5-rocket-plans
This is a discussion about NASA SAYING there are blueprints but for people who have seen them, they don't really say anything. They are like Part A goes into Part B.
https://space.stackexchange.com/ques...lans-destroyed
Here is a NEW YORK TIMES article for 1987 saying THERE ARE NO PLANS.
https://www.nytimes.com/1987/05/26/s...on-rocket.html
It says what I have been saying REPEATEDLY that the US government, that keeps thousand page documents on the private lives of celebrities, let NASA THROW TOGETHER the moon rocket, with no control, no documentation, and they let them throw all the stuff away, and sell it for scrap, after the most amazing adventure and technological event in the history of humanity.
But, we know with which hand Martin Luther King wiped his ass with.
Meanwhile, like some expert on retardation, you're like, :day have microfilm n stuff, and indubitably my conclusions are self-evident".
You can't even bother to look sh!t up.
But you can't so instead of saying something directly to me, like a bitch, you talk about me, but never confront me.
I haven't said ONE wacky thing in this thread.
About the plans:
NASA admitted to losing the plans, and mentioned in this discussion and now the press releases are deleted by NASA.
https://ask.metafilter.com/89955/Why...5-rocket-plans
This is a discussion about NASA SAYING there are blueprints but for people who have seen them, they don't really say anything. They are like Part A goes into Part B.
https://space.stackexchange.com/ques...lans-destroyed
Here is a NEW YORK TIMES article for 1987 saying THERE ARE NO PLANS.
https://www.nytimes.com/1987/05/26/s...on-rocket.html
It says what I have been saying REPEATEDLY that the US government, that keeps thousand page documents on the private lives of celebrities, let NASA THROW TOGETHER the moon rocket, with no control, no documentation, and they let them throw all the stuff away, and sell it for scrap, after the most amazing adventure and technological event in the history of humanity.
But, we know with which hand Martin Luther King wiped his ass with.
Meanwhile, like some expert on retardation, you're like, :day have microfilm n stuff, and indubitably my conclusions are self-evident".
You can't even bother to look sh!t up.
Barely worth responding to the drivel, but here goes:
You posted an askmetafilter question, and stackexchange question (note the response agreeing with what I said, particularly that leading stackexchange answer).
The TIMES article from way back in 87 is saying all kinds of things, just casual journalism I suppose, including
'But we found the stuff we needed: all of our planning, our drawings and specifications, and a lot of the tooling drawings. When somebody says something is missing, they're probably right. But we've got boxes and boxes of stuff, basically everything needed to get started again.'' Inventory of Documents
Jim Sahli, a spokesman at the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala., where the rocket was designed, said that although the tooling was indeed gone, many of the blueprints remained. ''What we don't have here, we have at a depository in Atlanta,'' he said. In the past year, Marshall has performed a detailed inventory of its Saturn documents.
Seems like they have all kinds of documentation left, just in various storage areas...probably not every last piece of documentation...but who knows.Jim Sahli, a spokesman at the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala., where the rocket was designed, said that although the tooling was indeed gone, many of the blueprints remained. ''What we don't have here, we have at a depository in Atlanta,'' he said. In the past year, Marshall has performed a detailed inventory of its Saturn documents.
None of this relevant to the fact we went to the moon for the record.
We have literal full examples of the Saturn V, if someone really wanted to reverse engineer various things without even going to the documents, I mean it’s possible (but there are all kinds of reasons why NASA isn’t rebuilding full 60s rockets that were built with 60s technology).
Actually an example of an old F-1 (that huge rocket engine you see on the bottom of the Saturn V) was essentially reverse engineered into a derivative F-1B meant for the SLS.
Here is a very thorough article on it:
https://arstechnica.com/science/2013...to-life/?amp=1
Note the article also agreeing with what I said saying the Saturn and F-1 documentation not lost.
Whatever you are going on about is just debunked talking points and has no relevance to the moon landing anyway.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
12-08-2020, 10:13 PM
-
#316
Originally Posted By brumbleman⏩
Why wouldn’t they admit it, if data from a far off nebula or galaxy is captured in an electro magnetic range other than visible light (NASA has probes that solely capture infrared and ultraviolet, microwave emr), the only way to represent the data in the visible spectrum is through filters. Of course the nebula wont actually look like that to us because we can only see a very narrow part of the spectrum and cant see UV microwave or infrared emr. The visible light images of these objects alone would be quite unremarkable due to the distances involved, you need the rest of the spectrum to get a good picture. NASA never tried to mislead anyone on these, each image says if it is in visible light or a compilation of other wavelengths. Very different from claiming that the moon landing photos (which were taken with a standard camera in visible light) were faked.Oak Ridge manufactured Uranium for the A-bomb with a minimum of 75,000 people, mostly in a comparmentalized manner. Still, they hired in a Russian spy. **** can happen.
https://science.howstuffworks.com/oa...tomic-city.htm
NASA does admit it runs their photos through filters, fyi.
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_841187
https://www.slashgear.com/adobe-deta...otos-29407147/
https://science.howstuffworks.com/oa...tomic-city.htm
NASA does admit it runs their photos through filters, fyi.
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_841187
https://www.slashgear.com/adobe-deta...otos-29407147/
S/B/D—185/165/205 (sumo w/ straps)
12-08-2020, 10:15 PM
-
#317
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
Can we talk about another NASA conspiracy?
How about the time the Columbia was destroyed because of damage that was cause by foam?
How about the time the Columbia was destroyed because of damage that was cause by foam?
As
12-08-2020, 10:18 PM
-
#318
- InfoSuperHwy
- Banned
-
- InfoSuperHwy
- Banned
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 566
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
Yes, and how convenient that was.Can we talk about another NASA conspiracy?
How about the time the Columbia was destroyed because of damage that was cause by foam?
How about the time the Columbia was destroyed because of damage that was cause by foam?
12-08-2020, 10:27 PM
-
#319
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
Originally Posted By InfoSuperHwy⏩
It's strange, they can think of everything to get to the moon, but a piece of foam hitting the shuttle at take off was all it took to damage the craft to cause its ultimate demise.Yes, and how convenient that was.
As
12-09-2020, 03:04 AM
-
#320
- TheCreature55
- Registered User
-
- TheCreature55
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Location: Australia
- Posts: 3,400
- Rep Power: 5658
-
-
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
What are you trying to say here?It's strange, they can think of everything to get to the moon, but a piece of foam hitting the shuttle at take off was all it took to damage the craft to cause its ultimate demise.
Space travel is dangerous and accidents can happen. This happened during the Apollo program too; look up Apollo 1.
12-09-2020, 05:23 AM
-
#321
- leoslayer1
- Registered User
-
- leoslayer1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: United States
- Age: 56
- Posts: 27,840
- Rep Power: 194666
-
-
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
What conspiracy is thisCan we talk about another NASA conspiracy?
How about the time the Columbia was destroyed because of damage that was cause by foam?
How about the time the Columbia was destroyed because of damage that was cause by foam?
U
12-09-2020, 07:57 AM
-
#322
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
Originally Posted By leoslayer1⏩
The space shuttle Columbia disaster in 2003, and how they want us to believe a piece of foam caused the shuttle to be compromised.What conspiracy is this
As
12-09-2020, 08:59 AM
-
#323
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
What a f@cking coward you are.Reread the three points in my post you quoted: none of them have changed.
Barely worth responding to the drivel, but here goes:
You posted an askmetafilter question, and stackexchange question (note the response agreeing with what I said, particularly that leading stackexchange answer).
The TIMES article from way back in 87 is saying all kinds of things, just casual journalism I suppose, including
Barely worth responding to the drivel, but here goes:
You posted an askmetafilter question, and stackexchange question (note the response agreeing with what I said, particularly that leading stackexchange answer).
The TIMES article from way back in 87 is saying all kinds of things, just casual journalism I suppose, including
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
12-09-2020, 10:28 AM
-
#324
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
This is your response to my post addressing your post in detail? None? Hmmmm.What a f@cking coward you are.
What a f@cking coward you are.
See how mindless that response is?
TheAdlerian....cluttering the thread with his mess of drivel, nothing to see here.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
12-09-2020, 10:39 AM
-
#325
- AltarOfPlagues
- yerrrrrrrr meh?
-
- AltarOfPlagues
- yerrrrrrrr meh?
- Join Date: Oct 2015
- Posts: 14,613
- Rep Power: 136737
-
-
there's no way we could ever get to the moon since it doesnt exist.
do not read my posts and weep, i am not there i do not sleep
i am the thousand greens that rep, i am the ban bet dutifully kept
of memes and trolls in toasted breads, i am not there, i am not dead.
12-09-2020, 05:34 PM
-
#326
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
Originally Posted By AltarOfPlagues⏩
You see that space x shuttle that blew up today?there's no way we could ever get to the moon since it doesnt exist.
As
12-09-2020, 05:38 PM
-
#327
I swear the people who are still saying we landed on the moon are boomers or shills online
There is no fuking way we did a sci fi space travel to the moon and back on first try back in 1969
You are nuts if you think we have put men past earths lower orbit
There is no fuking way we did a sci fi space travel to the moon and back on first try back in 1969
You are nuts if you think we have put men past earths lower orbit
PC specs
i9 9900k/AMD RX 6800 16 GB/16 GB RAM/LG BX 65'' OLED/Gigabyte GS27QC 27''
OLED Master Race crew
1440p 120+ fps only crew
6'2 master race crew
Audiophile crew
Metal crew
Introvert/INTJ crew
German crew
If you aren't getting stronger you aren't getting bigger crew
12-09-2020, 06:13 PM
-
#328
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
Originally Posted By eod8989⏩
Inb4 it took 8 trys.I swear the people who are still saying we landed on the moon are boomers or shills online
There is no fuking way we did a sci fi space travel to the moon and back on first try back in 1969
You are nuts if you think we have put men past earths lower orbit
There is no fuking way we did a sci fi space travel to the moon and back on first try back in 1969
You are nuts if you think we have put men past earths lower orbit
As
12-09-2020, 06:19 PM
-
#329
- Mult1Tro11
- Banned
-
- Mult1Tro11
- Banned
- Join Date: Dec 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 191
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By umop3pisdn⏩
im still flabbergasted (off 2 tabs of acid) that this POS supposedly made it to the moon and on 1060's technology. **** looks like it would crumble from a strong gust of wind
12-09-2020, 06:29 PM
-
#330
- Lunatic
- The Cripple
-
- Lunatic
- The Cripple
- Join Date: Nov 2002
- Location: United States
- Posts: 57,101
- Rep Power: 494160
-
-
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
A pseudo-intellectual like yourself is fully aware of what he's saying. It's just another deflection because you're a retarded pussy that can't acknowledge his autistic mistakes.I literally don't even know what you think you are trying to say.
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Says the moron that never addresses points that are contrary to your position.What a f@cking coward you are.
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
He's been busted for frauding about his life, refuses to acknowledge posts that call his claims into question, resorts to deflections and insults when someone doesn't believe him (for good reason), and he has the nerve to call others a coward?This is your response to my post addressing your post in detail? None? Hmmmm.
What a f@cking coward you are.
See how mindless that response is?
TheAdlerian....cluttering the thread with his mess of drivel, nothing to see here.
What a f@cking coward you are.
See how mindless that response is?
TheAdlerian....cluttering the thread with his mess of drivel, nothing to see here.
FFS, he said he can't defend himself because he's a registered weapon. He said he squatted 1000lbs. He said one of his jobs was to keep the criminally insane (not in jail) in check. He claims his life is a Chinese curse. He claims vaccines were invented by "Big Mohammed." I could use him as a case study for mental illness.
0% chance he addresses this post's points.
AcetylCoA gets reps
"God your dunce." - Swept
LSU Tigers/Washington Nationals
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts