Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Based Tulsi Gabbard takes a stand against trans*******ry
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 42
  2. Page 1 of 2
  3. 1
  4. 2
  6. Last

Thread: Based Tulsi Gabbard takes a stand against trans*******ry

post 1626166943 12-21-2020, 12:51 AM
-
#1
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087

Based Tulsi Gabbard takes a stand against trans*******ry

Cliffs:
- Bill compels federally funded universities to require that trans*******s compete in sports according to their biological sex, determined at birth, by a doctor.
- Trans*******s seething
- WTF I love women in politics now

Democratic Hawaii Rep. and former 2020 Presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard introduced a bill into the U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday that would dictate Title IX protections for female athletes be based on biological sex—a term often used to refer to gender assigned to a person at birth—that advocate have decried as inherently transphobic.

Title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any educational program or activity that receives federal funding, and is well known for its requirement that women’s sports programming receive equal support to men’s programming.

Gabbard, who declined to run for re-election in 2020 and is in the final days of her Congressional term, introduced the bill, titled the “Protect Women’s Sports Act,” with Republican Oklahoma Rep. Markwayne Mullin. Republican Georgia Sen. Kelly Loeffler introduced a similar bill, titled “the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act,” into the Senate in September. (Loeffler’s bill has not been taken up for a vote.)
How long until this certified HBB crosses the aisle?

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-...ouse-bill/8932
https://time.com/5920758/tulsi-gabba...-women-sports/
post 1626167393 12-21-2020, 01:02 AM
-
#2
  1. witcher3fan83
  2. Banned
  1. witcher3fan83
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 738
  6. Rep Power: 0
I would die for Tulsi.

She’s been getting it in the neck for this all week. It’s made people I previously saw as sensible lose their minds.
post 1626167643 12-21-2020, 01:09 AM
-
#3
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By witcher3fan83⏩
I would die for Tulsi.

She’s been getting it in the neck for this all week. It’s made people I previously saw as sensible lose their minds.
No way she can stay a Democrat after this.

The President, who is supposedly from the same party as her, is publicly giving the go ahead to 9 year old children receiving the trans******* chemical castration treatment at their own behest.

Realizing thread should probably be in R&P so I'm go to report myself and see if the mods will do me a favor.
post 1626167653 12-21-2020, 01:10 AM
-
#4
  1. anonymous
  2. Guest
  1. anonymous
  2. Guest
  3. Join Date:
  4. Posts: 12,500
  5. Rep Power: 1
Tulsi is legit based. i've always been a fan.

she's trying to protect women and gay males are gonna try and spitroast her for this
post 1626167673 12-21-2020, 01:11 AM
-
#5
  1. LinuxJon
  1. LinuxJon
  3. Join Date: Apr 2014
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 49,073
  6. Rep Power: 325966
I'm conservative but she's based AF and I'd vote for her over half the RINOs.

Also Woodbury
480s / 370b / 495d / 235 x 2 SOHP

Trump 2020
DeSantis 2024
Catbrah 2032

Misc Firearms Crew
Misc Wristwatch Crew
Will sell wife's foot pics for watch/gun money crew
Definitely not a fed crew
post 1626167713 12-21-2020, 01:13 AM
-
#6
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By yieldtonothing⏩
Tulsi is legit based. i've always been a fan.

she's trying to protect women and gay males are gonna try and spitroast her for this
She honestly strikes me as one of the few truly centrist politicians in America right now and she just gets completely phucked by the Democratic establishment. I don't agree with her on everything, but she gets the big stuff right imo.

Literally the one Democratic politician besides maybe Joe Manchin about whom I can say that.
post 1626167863 12-21-2020, 01:18 AM
-
#7
  1. zyzzliftswjesus
  2. Registered User
  1. zyzzliftswjesus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,871
  6. Rep Power: 6763
Their audience are so ****ing stupid they had to explain what biological sex was "a term often used to refer to gender assigned to a person at birth". *****, that is the only thing there is. **** out of here.
post 1626167933 12-21-2020, 01:21 AM
-
#8
  1. y0l0sw4g69
  2. Banned
  1. y0l0sw4g69
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 241
  6. Rep Power: 0
Just LOL. Can you imagine our ancestors hearing about the future in the year 2020? In 2020, its controversial to take a stand and say people shouldn't mutilate their own nature-assigned genderparts. Honk honk, clown world
post 1626167943 12-21-2020, 01:21 AM
-
#9
  1. anonymous
  2. Guest
  1. anonymous
  2. Guest
  3. Join Date:
  4. Posts: 12,500
  5. Rep Power: 1
Originally Posted By TomWanks⏩
She honestly strikes me as one of the few truly centrist politicians in America right now and she just gets completely phucked by the Democratic establishment. I don't agree with her on everything, but she gets the big stuff right imo.

Literally the one Democratic politician besides maybe Joe Manchin about whom I can say that.
i don't see her as a centrist.
she's left, but she's real left. she's not lip service massage your fragile ego left.
post 1626168163 12-21-2020, 01:28 AM
-
#10
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By zyzzliftswjesus⏩
Their audience are so ****ing stupid they had to explain what biological sex was "a term often used to refer to gender assigned to a person at birth". *****, that is the only thing there is. **** out of here.
lmfao yes I noticed this as well.

As if the term is somehow outdated and antiquated.

JFL.
Originally Posted By yieldtonothing⏩
i don't see her as a centrist.
she's left, but she's real left. she's not lip service massage your fragile ego left.
Sounds like she's just doing this on her way out anyway, as I guess she chose not to run for reelection.

Anyway, the bill will probably be struck down immediately in the house and is largely symbolic but what a time to be alive, when saying a woman is a woman and a man is a man is going to be voted overwhelmingly against by the United States Congress.
post 1626168773 12-21-2020, 01:51 AM
-
#11
  1. EternaLovE
  2. Banned
  1. EternaLovE
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Posts: 9,643
  5. Rep Power: 0
tulsi is part of the world economic forum with klaus, i dont trust her at all.

sure she's allowed to say a few things about truth but what of her true agenda? who the fuk knows .
post 1626173183 12-21-2020, 04:40 AM
-
#12
  1. mk2kh
  2. Registered User
  1. mk2kh
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,076
  6. Rep Power: 1849
A lot of these mtf use female toilets where there hv been incidents of rape/molestation
post 1626176493 12-21-2020, 06:02 AM
-
#13
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By LargePeter⏩
She fukin deserves to get it in the neck for suggesting that excessive corporate profits should be taxed to fund small business survival plans because state governments are responsible for the archaic shut down measures and have no plans to fix the problems except Homer Simpsons plan of "Can't someone else do it?"

She's exposed herself as a socialist pig and nothing more
I agree with almost none of her economic policy, but it’s hardly even that radical compared to what most leftcels are proposing these days.

Taxing corporate profit to aid small business isn’t even that terrible of an idea compared the kind of socialism LARP policy floating around the house rn. How can you oppose punitive measures against the stock buyback mafia? Those *******s should be dragged through the streets by their hair and left in the stocks for weeks for that chit ded srs.

She gets most social policy right though and her focus on American institutions and rationality is really welcome tbh because she’s practically alone in that regard on the left. That’s why I consider her a respectable centrist, she far from ideal but she is at least not a hysterical shrew like Pelosi, AOC, or Schumar.
post 1626176553 12-21-2020, 06:04 AM
-
#14
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
If the democrats had wanted to win legitimately instead of cheating they would have had her as their nominee.
post 1626176643 12-21-2020, 06:06 AM
-
#15
  1. Mercworx
  2. Registered User
  1. Mercworx
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 17,083
  5. Rep Power: 125830
Her and Yang are in the wrong party imo.



Used to think Yang was crazy but now im not sure. They should both join the new developing Republican party.
post 1626176663 12-21-2020, 06:06 AM
-
#16
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
If the democrats had wanted to win legitimately instead of cheating they would have had her as their nominee.
I have thought the same thing. She is the only candidate to whom liberalism does not explicitly equal deep seated hatred for the foundational principles of America.
post 1626176813 12-21-2020, 06:10 AM
-
#17
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
  5. Posts: 66,936
  6. Rep Power: 214514
Originally Posted By zyzzliftswjesus⏩
Their audience are so ****ing stupid they had to explain what biological sex was "a term often used to refer to gender assigned to a person at birth". *****, that is the only thing there is. **** out of here.
Leftist gen pop is INCREDIBLY stupid. Why do you think Kamala felt the need to explain what the word "debt" meant in the VP debate.
These people make the stereotypical republican trailer park methheads look like scholars.
*PUREBLOOD CREW*
*DAD CREW*
*SUPER STRAIGHT*
*NATURAL DICK CREW*
*CCW*
post 1626177453 12-21-2020, 06:26 AM
-
#18
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By LargePeter⏩
A corporation has no responsibility to small businesses, a corporation has responsibility to its shareholders.

Why should shareholder share of profits be cut for the benefit of smaller business?

If the government doesn't own the business it's increasing the taxes on, it shouldn't be taxing them.

Start looking at government wastage, the bloated civil service and politician salaries first.
I agree with you almost 100%. The government has no business giving enormous bailouts to “too big to fail” corporations who take it with next to no conditions, use it to make sure their stock doesn’t collapse (as opposed to actually just increasing their profitability via competitive improvements), and then laying off tens of thousands of Americans— whose taxes were used to finance that same corporate welfare.

But they’ve already done all that now and they should be punished for it.

Artificially propping up a business via tax money is not a “responsibility” to the stockholder. It’s socialism. At least real socialist regimes have the balls to attach strings to their welfare.
post 1626177923 12-21-2020, 06:39 AM
-
#19
  1. Polaris
  1. Polaris
  3. Join Date: Feb 2003
  4. Posts: 63,727
  5. Rep Power: 568352
I don't know, as far as the trannies in female sports thing - I'm mainly of the thought that, females tend to overly be in favor of the stuff that leads to shyt like this - so I kind of applaud it. You wanted it, you got it - let them experience some of the consequences for their dumb feels/emotion over logic BS.
post 1626177993 12-21-2020, 06:41 AM
-
#20
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  1. JoshSP1985
  2. Anti-Circumcision
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
  5. Posts: 66,936
  6. Rep Power: 214514
Originally Posted By Polaris⏩
I don't know, as far as the trannies in female sports thing - I'm mainly of the thought that, females tend to overly be in favor of the stuff that leads to shyt like this - so I kind of applaud it. You wanted it, you got it - let them experience some of the consequences for their dumb feels/emotion over logic BS.
The problem is they don't learn from their lesson. That's why the only real solution is to not allow them to act in the first place.
*PUREBLOOD CREW*
*DAD CREW*
*SUPER STRAIGHT*
*NATURAL DICK CREW*
*CCW*
post 1626178233 12-21-2020, 06:45 AM
-
#21
  1. Polaris
  1. Polaris
  3. Join Date: Feb 2003
  4. Posts: 63,727
  5. Rep Power: 568352
Originally Posted By JoshSP1985⏩
The problem is they don't learn from their lesson.That's why the only real solution is to not allow them to act in the first place.
Agreed.
post 1626180073 12-21-2020, 07:15 AM
-
#22
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By LargePeter⏩
Explain why corporations should be bound to rules of small business welfare when they've had nothing to do with the death of said business due to government policy?
They shouldn't.

But if they are going to use their tax-payer funded bailouts to artificially pump up the value of their stock that would otherwise completely collapse, then the government should expect to see a return on some of that money in the form of taxes on their less severely diminished profitability.

The government has smaller scale assistance programs for smaller businesses already. Corporate subsidization of those programs seems like the perfect way to offset the enormous tax burden the government underwrote to ensure those ******* businesses didn't collapse either.
post 1626180153 12-21-2020, 07:16 AM
-
#23
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 50
  5. Posts: 32,523
  6. Rep Power: 202517
Originally Posted By LargePeter⏩
Explain why corporations should be bound to rules of small business welfare when they've had nothing to do with the death of said business due to government policy?
They paid for the government policy?


Notice how the larger corporations have increased profits while small businesses are shut down?

Why do you think the larger corporations are allowed to operate as usual while small businesses are persecuted?


That doesn't mean I agree with OPGenesis' hot take, but lol if you don't believe that "campaign contributions" influence policy.
^^Former 300+lb Crew^^

WWPB2D

Nothing worthwile is ever easy.

The beatings will continue until morale improves.
post 1626180423 12-21-2020, 07:20 AM
-
#24
  1. AltarOfPlagues
  2. yerrrrrrrr meh?
  1. AltarOfPlagues
  2. yerrrrrrrr meh?
  3. Join Date: Oct 2015
  4. Posts: 14,613
  5. Rep Power: 136737
i thought she demolished kamala in the primary debates

could she be our guy?

do not read my posts and weep, i am not there i do not sleep
i am the thousand greens that rep, i am the ban bet dutifully kept
of memes and trolls in toasted breads, i am not there, i am not dead.
post 1626181963 12-21-2020, 07:43 AM
-
#25
  1. BFast55
  2. Registered User
  1. BFast55
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Location: Houston, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 21,674
  6. Rep Power: 89831
Willing to be she is privately more conservative than her public persona. Most attractive women are.
***Alabama Crimson Tide***

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Vince Lombardi
post 1626182773 12-21-2020, 07:54 AM
-
#26
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By BFast55⏩
Willing to be she is privately more conservative than her public persona. Most attractive women are.
Imagining the smell now.
post 1626183033 12-21-2020, 07:58 AM
-
#27
  1. tbonestake
  2. Registered User
  1. tbonestake
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Posts: 4,989
  5. Rep Power: 15065
Tulsi 2024, srs
post 1626183063 12-21-2020, 07:58 AM
-
#28
  1. SmillironS
  2. Registered User
  1. SmillironS
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: South Dakota
  5. Age: 41
  6. Height: 6'8"
  7. Weight: 350 lbs
  8. Posts: 11,296
  9. Subscribers: 2
  10. Rep Power: 189689
Originally Posted By LargePeter⏩
A corporation has no responsibility to small businesses, a corporation has responsibility to its shareholders.

Why should shareholder share of profits be cut for the benefit of smaller business?

If the government doesn't own the business it's increasing the taxes on, it shouldn't be taxing them.

Start looking at government wastage, the bloated civil service and politician salaries first.
Shhhhhh, you’re making too much sense.
post 1626183323 12-21-2020, 08:03 AM
-
#29
  1. AltarOfPlagues
  2. yerrrrrrrr meh?
  1. AltarOfPlagues
  2. yerrrrrrrr meh?
  3. Join Date: Oct 2015
  4. Posts: 14,613
  5. Rep Power: 136737
Originally Posted By LargePeter⏩
Explain why corporations should be bound to rules of small business welfare when they've had nothing to do with the death of said business due to government policy?
to protect the general public from an oligopolistic market sector. im not sayin thats what i believe, but thats the (very fukin obvious) premise.
do not read my posts and weep, i am not there i do not sleep
i am the thousand greens that rep, i am the ban bet dutifully kept
of memes and trolls in toasted breads, i am not there, i am not dead.
post 1626184053 12-21-2020, 08:13 AM
-
#30
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 50
  5. Posts: 32,523
  6. Rep Power: 202517
Originally Posted By LargePeter⏩
The government should reduce its own size before it attempts to meddle further in corporate affairs

So basically take lobby money from larger businesses in the knowledge that they will shut down small business, in turn increasing profits so they can pay the government even more money?
Yes, so really it all boils down to government corruption or ineptitude in the end...
^^Former 300+lb Crew^^

WWPB2D

Nothing worthwile is ever easy.

The beatings will continue until morale improves.
  1. Page 1 of 2
  2. 1
  3. 2
  5. Last
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts