Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» A lot of disinformation on covid on here
  1. Results 181 to 210 of 760
  2. First
  3. 5
  4. 6
  5. 7
  6. 8
  7. 9
  8. Last
post 1627375573 01-03-2021, 02:32 PM
-
#181
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 7,371
  6. Rep Power: 47124
fukin lol @ worrying about the sweet n sour sniffles. Braindead sheep. The government can't even run the government efficiently, they are in no position to tell people how much risk we can and can't take. Nothing should have been closed, masks should not be required... people should be allowed to make their own decisions. But liberal braindead sheep love control and their constituents love being controlled so here we are. Thank god I live in red Texas.
post 1627375693 01-03-2021, 02:33 PM
-
#182
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By wincel
Covid is primarily transmitted via respiratory droplets. The size of the viral particles is irrelevant. People asked this question. It was answered. You should go fuk yourself. Hard.
don't run any of that nonsense about "large droplet theory"..There's zero scientific evidence for that. I'm not the only one who's noticed this, there's a group of 239 scientists who signed a letter to the WHO. Not that they should have needed to; unless you're a mouth-breathing idiot the early outbreak in an apartment building at Wuhan where there were no plumbing traps and thus gas (aerosol) from people's scat was getting into other people's apartments and the outbreak occurred across floors units where the individuals had no reasonable possibility of personal or droplet contact along with the choir group that took all manner of reasonable precaution yet got infected anyway all make clear that in fact the so-called "large drop only" theory is nonsense. It not only has no basis given the spread we have observed but has no basis in physics either.


A single COVID molecule is 120 nm's average and a single water molecule is 282 nm's average. The assumption is that everything a person breaths out is at least four water molecules and one COVID molecule in size. In fact the virus only needs one water molecule to travel on. So how many of them are passed through the mask? Try this and let me know what happens. And don't lie, I already know the results. Put on a mask, lift the mask and with a vape take a normal inhale and replace the mask, now exhale and tell us what happens. I'll remind you that people that vape are inhaling water vapors, whether they are flavored or not, and upon exhaling there is still a good amount of vapor let through the mask. Now imagine standing in line behind some one with COVID, and lets say it is an average of 5 min, now imagine vaping in that spot for five min, this is what it would be like if someone had COVID. Now you are stepping up into an infected area and breathing it in.

In short.. urine idiot
post 1627375713 01-03-2021, 02:33 PM
-
#183
  1. StyleGent
  2. Registered User
  1. StyleGent
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 721
  6. Rep Power: 2055
WINCEL hates science

ROFL

84%
post 1627375793 01-03-2021, 02:35 PM
-
#184
  1. BulkingIsHard
  2. Registered Bigot
  1. BulkingIsHard
  2. Registered Bigot
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Posts: 12,670
  5. Rep Power: 70015
Originally Posted By wincel
So uhh if you think we should wait 20 years to see if the vaccine works, that's great. Please write the CDC and inform them of your advice. The rest of us will be taking the vaccine. And if you're military, law enforcement, or an essential worker, you'll be taking it as well. Sorry bud.

No no no. You have me all wrong. I absolutely do believe people like you should burn. Glad I cleared that up.
Don’t need a vaccine because I’ve already tested positive. Feels good being confirmed genetically superior to quarantinecels with their inferior immune system hiding inside.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_decline
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societal_collapse#By_absorption
post 1627376343 01-03-2021, 02:42 PM
-
#185
  1. StyleGent
  2. Registered User
  1. StyleGent
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 721
  6. Rep Power: 2055
How can a study like Pfizer have a completely healthy cohort, minimal COVID 19 cases, no COVID 19 deaths, be considered good science?

hint hint, its not

this isn't the first time Pfizer put together a weak ass study under pressure

Pfizer is currently engaged in alegal battle with the Federal Government of Nigeriaand the Government of Kano State in Nigeria on the ethical and legal issues emanating from that trial.6 There was reportedly no proper institutional review board (IRB) review of the
study in Nigeria, and a local principal investigator was purported to have backdated an IRB approval certificate.7 There is also a serious question as to whether the study was approved by the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC),
Nigeria’s regulatory agency equivalent to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA),8 although Pfizer insist that it has clear evidence that it was.9 The appropriateness of the informed consent process used in the studywas questioned, including the decision to obtain verbal
consent from the parents or guardians of children affected by the epidemic.
10 Personnel and resources that should have been directed at the public health response to the epidemic appeared to have been diverted to Pfizer’s research activities.11


Don't worry the good ole boys at pfizer only made the families wait 15 years before paying them out
post 1627376723 01-03-2021, 02:47 PM
-
#186
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By StyleGent
How can a study like Pfizer have a completely healthy cohort, minimal COVID 19 cases, no COVID 19 deaths, be considered good science?

hint hint, its not

this isn't the first time Pfizer put together a weak ass study under pressure

Pfizer is currently engaged in alegal battle with the Federal Government of Nigeriaand the Government of Kano State in Nigeria on the ethical and legal issues emanating from that trial.6 There was reportedly no proper institutional review board (IRB) review of the
study in Nigeria, and a local principal investigator was purported to have backdated an IRB approval certificate.7 There is also a serious question as to whether the study was approved by the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC),
Nigeria’s regulatory agency equivalent to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA),8 although Pfizer insist that it has clear evidence that it was.9 The appropriateness of the informed consent process used in the studywas questioned, including the decision to obtain verbal
consent from the parents or guardians of children affected by the epidemic.
10 Personnel and resources that should have been directed at the public health response to the epidemic appeared to have been diverted to Pfizer’s research activities.11


Don't worry the good ole boys at pfizer only made the families wait 15 years before paying them out
Sue Pfizer then. Has absolutely zero to do with anything I posted.
post 1627376853 01-03-2021, 02:50 PM
-
#187
  1. messomi
  2. ▇ █ █ ▇ █ █ ▇
  1. messomi
  2. ▇ █ █ ▇ █ █ ▇
  3. Join Date: Apr 2017
  4. Posts: 20,365
  5. Rep Power: 362412
too bad I can't vote I would have voted this a 1 star anti science thread.
post 1627376953 01-03-2021, 02:51 PM
-
#188
  1. FAPhaggot
  2. Hawaiian shirt hoarder
  1. FAPhaggot
  2. Hawaiian shirt hoarder
  3. Join Date: Nov 2015
  4. Posts: 24,226
  5. Rep Power: 185354
ITT y'all provide entertainment for Wincel to get him through another one of his empty days.
FA Crew
Always Pick 1 Crew

"Experience is something you get right after you need it."
post 1627377043 01-03-2021, 02:53 PM
-
#189
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
If any of you dispute the results presented here, please feel free to submit your findings for publication and go sit on a barbed wire dildo and twist.

Thanks!
post 1627377843 01-03-2021, 03:03 PM
-
#190
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Really good resource I found for covid deniers, anti maskers, anti vaxxers, Trump supporters, etc:

post 1627378613 01-03-2021, 03:16 PM
-
#191
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By wincel
If any of you dispute the results presented here, please feel free to submit your findings for publication and go sit on a barbed wire dildo and twist.

Thanks!
Masks do not work. If they did then all my time in the Army they would have issued me a surgical mask. Our official protective mask, not gas mask because it will not stop gasses, will stop the molecules from passing through. But it has an exposure life and once reached will let them particles through.

Wincel here was cucked by either poor genetics or absentee parents who failed him.
post 1627379033 01-03-2021, 03:20 PM
-
#192
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Paul
Masks do not work. If they did then all my time in the Army they would have issued me a surgical mask. Our official protective mask, not gas mask because it will not stop gasses, will stop the molecules from passing through. But it has an exposure life and once reached will let them particles through
Masks reduce the risk of transmission. They are not complete protection.
post 1627379253 01-03-2021, 03:22 PM
-
#193
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By wincel
Masks reduce the risk of transmission. They are not complete protection.
The surgical mask was designed to prevent bacterial infections on patients during surgery while the Doctor's and Nurses communicated back and forth over the open wound. It was made to stop 1000 nm's or larger molecules. COVID virus is on average 120 nm's, 10 times smaller, and water molecules are on average 282 nm's in size. Where as oxygen on average is .02 nm's in size, and most gasses are close to that. Very tiny. That is why in the military the protective mask is called just that and not a gas mask. If it were a gas mask then you would not be able to breath through the mask. If you still think the surgical mask or a piece of cloth works then by all means try this. One room holds COVID and one room holds VX Nerve agent. Both very close in size. In both rooms they hold the same small amount. Would you go in both rooms with just a surgical mask or cloth mask? Or would you pass on them both? Or pass on the Nerve agent?
post 1627379273 01-03-2021, 03:23 PM
-
#194
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Paul
The surgical mask was designed to prevent bacterial infections on patients during surgery while the Doctor's and Nurses communicated back and forth over the open wound. It was made to stop 1000 nm's or larger molecules. COVID virus is on average 120 nm's, 10 times smaller, and water molecules are on average 282 nm's in size. Where as oxygen on average is .02 nm's in size, and most gasses are close to that. Very tiny. That is why in the military the protective mask is called just that and not a gas mask. If it were a gas mask then you would not be able to breath through the mask. If you still think the surgical mask or a piece of cloth works then by all means try this. One room holds COVID and one room holds VX Nerve agent. Both very close in size. In both rooms they hold the same small amount. Would you go in both rooms with just a surgical mask or cloth mask? Or would you pass on them both? Or pass on the Nerve agent?
Respiratory. Droplet.
post 1627379513 01-03-2021, 03:25 PM
-
#195
  1. Briangumble
  2. I run the Misc
  1. Briangumble
  2. I run the Misc
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Posts: 10,812
  5. Rep Power: 13997
Originally Posted By wincel
Here is a lecture on how the pfizer vaccine works:

We're not taking the vaccine bro. If the CEO of pfizer won't even take it, why would you think we would to take it?
post 1627379903 01-03-2021, 03:29 PM
-
#196
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Briangumble
We're not taking the vaccine bro. If the CEO of pfizer won't even take it, why would you think we would to take it?
You will take it. Eventually you will all take it.



post 1627380883 01-03-2021, 03:39 PM
-
#197
  1. Briangumble
  2. I run the Misc
  1. Briangumble
  2. I run the Misc
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Posts: 10,812
  5. Rep Power: 13997
Originally Posted By wincel
You will take it. Eventually you will all take it.



If they try and mandate it then I'll just get fraud papers off the darkweb that says I took it already.
post 1627382833 01-03-2021, 04:02 PM
-
#198
  1. LargePeter
  2. Fuck off, Lahey!
  1. LargePeter
  2. Fuck off, Lahey!
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: Kuntstralia, Australia
  5. Posts: 41,459
  6. Subscribers: 5
  7. Rep Power: 572509
Originally Posted By frankdtank20
It's unfortunate that virtually all HCQ studies either didn't also supplement zinc and/or only conducted studies in hospitalized patients, which is a guaranteed failure, as the viral load has already reached its peak or near peak in hospitalized patients, and it is too late to be stopped by HCQ + zinc. People setting up such studies have to know this, so why conduct such studies at all? Seems a bit like putting a seat belt on after the accident has happened.
...really? You can't think of any reason why studies were set up that didn't follow the correct Zelenko protocols?

Imagine if a cheap, readily available drug cocktail could stop all the lockdowns and the economic damage that has been done. Imagine if it could stop the transfer of wealth.

If you were part of the elite group engineering this great reset, and you got fuked over by HCQ, you'd be pissed yeah?
RAW DOG CREW LIEUTENANT

ALL ROADS LEAD TO MENTZER

President Donald J Trump Crew
Steroids Crew
Growth Hormone Crew
Miscers Who Lift Crew
Robert Pickton Hooker Disposal Crew
Mustang Crew
No Alcohol Crew

Gay Phaggot Crew:
Papi Cholo
post 1627382993 01-03-2021, 04:04 PM
-
#199
  1. mulletwarrior
  2. Registered User
  1. mulletwarrior
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2013
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 13,586
  6. Rep Power: 99233
Originally Posted By wincel
So uhh if you think we should wait 20 years to see if the vaccine works, that's great. Please write the CDC and inform them of your advice. The rest of us will be taking the vaccine. And if you're military, law enforcement, or an essential worker, you'll be taking it as well. Sorry bud.

No no no. You have me all wrong. I absolutely do believe people like you should burn. Glad I cleared that up.
Lol strong reading comprehension. My 2nd paragraph literally preempted your “retort” here. As I already said, everyone should assess their short term risks with respect to covid vs the unknown long term risk of the vaccine and make a decision accordingly. If you are 80+ or autoimmune compromised then rolling the dice on potential long term unknowns of a vaccine makes sense since COVID could kill you short term. If you are healthy, then makes sense to wait until more is known about long term risk (if any).

I realize the above approach may be more reasoned and nuanced than your black and white dogma allows, but religious zealots like you have always misunderstood and persecuted science and progress.

Stay medieval brah.
mo e
post 1627383153 01-03-2021, 04:06 PM
-
#200
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By mulletwarrior
Lol strong reading comprehension. My 2nd paragraph literally preempted your “retort” here. As I already said, everyone should assess their short term risks with respect to covid vs the unknown long term risk of the vaccine and make a decision accordingly. If you are 80+ or autoimmune compromised then rolling the dice on potential long term unknowns of a vaccine makes sense since COVID could kill you short term. If you are healthy, then makes sense to wait until more is known about long term risk (if any).

I realize the above approach may be more reasoned and nuanced than your black and white dogma allows, but religious zealots like you have always misunderstood and persecuted science and progress.

Stay medieval brah.
That's not the recommendation of the CDC. They recommend everyone without severe allergies get vaccinated. Go make your case to them, retard.

Sometimes a firm hand is required to get disobedient children back on track. There's a difference between healthy skepticism and obstructionism.
post 1627383823 01-03-2021, 04:14 PM
-
#201
  1. PatheticPeter
  2. Registered User
  1. PatheticPeter
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Age: 23
  5. Posts: 8,624
  6. Rep Power: 39163
My wife had it
I had it
6 coworkerd had it

Cliffs: just the flu
post 1627384253 01-03-2021, 04:19 PM
-
#202
  1. Getter_done
  1. Getter_done
  2. Join Date: Dec 2008
  3. Posts: 138,206
  4. Subscribers: 6
  5. Rep Power: 1140615
Cliffs on thread please?
post 1627384323 01-03-2021, 04:20 PM
-
#203
  1. LtGoose
  1. LtGoose
  2. Join Date: Jan 2014
  3. Location: Dallas, Texas, United States
  4. Age: 34
  5. Posts: 33,623
  6. Rep Power: 262212
Why is Wincel such a dumbass? Was it because his mother was a crack whore and dropped him on the head multiple times
post 1627384403 01-03-2021, 04:21 PM
-
#204
  1. drFEEL
  2. registered fuk ass
  1. drFEEL
  2. registered fuk ass
  3. Join Date: Jun 2013
  4. Posts: 7,990
  5. Rep Power: 7476
Originally Posted By wincel
Masks reduce the risk of transmission. They are not complete protection.
how much in percent do they reduce the risk? based on what study?

now, factor in noncompliance and tell me at what percent will it reduce the risk?

a condom theoretically should be 100% effective. but epidemiological evidence shows its somewhere less than 90% due to incorrect use and other various uncontrollable factors.

could a similar situation be seen with a piece of fabric covering where you breathe attempting to stop microscopic particles? hmmmmmmm.....

At what effectiveness do you scrap an intervention and call it ineffective?

do you ever destroy your whole house with a hammer while trying to smash a fly?

do you even logic bro?
-even lifts
-gonna make it or die trying crew
-no fat chicks crew
-#1 career thread creator
post 1627384473 01-03-2021, 04:22 PM
-
#205
  1. PatheticPeter
  2. Registered User
  1. PatheticPeter
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Age: 23
  5. Posts: 8,624
  6. Rep Power: 39163
Can someone make a mathematical equation for me?

If there was a spread -> masks mandate -> spread increases, conclusion masks dont work.

Logic dictates that.

Next hypothesis:
Masks reduce spread.
States and countries with no mask mandates did as well or better as those with. Logic would dictate masks dont reduce the spread.

In fact, seems like logic would dictate masks do absolutely nothing because you cannot present real numbers in a mask vs no mask comparison in either prevention or reduction.
post 1627384943 01-03-2021, 04:27 PM
-
#206
  1. mulletwarrior
  2. Registered User
  1. mulletwarrior
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2013
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 13,586
  6. Rep Power: 99233
Originally Posted By wincel
That's not the recommendation of the CDC. They recommend everyone without severe allergies get vaccinated. Go make your case to them, retard.

Sometimes a firm hand is required to get disobedient children back on track. There's a difference between healthy skepticism and obstructionism.
Show me the science, brah. Just one link to one study showing there are no long term effects. #ibelieveinscience
mo e
post 1627387213 01-03-2021, 04:50 PM
-
#207
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By drFEEL
how much in percent do they reduce the risk? based on what study?

now, factor in noncompliance and tell me at what percent will it reduce the risk?

a condom theoretically should be 100% effective. but epidemiological evidence shows its somewhere less than 90% due to incorrect use and other various uncontrollable factors.

could a similar situation be seen with a piece of fabric covering where you breathe attempting to stop microscopic particles? hmmmmmmm.....

At what effectiveness do you scrap an intervention and call it ineffective?

do you ever destroy your whole house with a hammer while trying to smash a fly?

do you even logic bro?
It's a mask. You'll live.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...142-9/fulltext

https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10...aff.2020.00818

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...sars-cov2.html
post 1627387323 01-03-2021, 04:51 PM
-
#208
  1. mp83
  2. i need a tan
  1. mp83
  2. i need a tan
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: Wisconsin, United States
  5. Posts: 12,073
  6. Rep Power: 97658
Originally Posted By tnel00
Imagine being scared of a ****ing cold

LMAO
340,000 people in the US die from a cold per year? Wow, we should tell scientists about your research since you obviously know more than they do
{Misc Fisherman Crew}
{Misc Investing Crew}
post 1627387343 01-03-2021, 04:51 PM
-
#209
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 7,371
  6. Rep Power: 47124
Originally Posted By mp83
340,000 people in the US die from a cold per year? Wow, we should tell scientists about your research since you obviously know more than they do
paniccels are hilarious. just stfu and wear your mask you good little sheep.
post 1627387373 01-03-2021, 04:52 PM
-
#210
  1. mp83
  2. i need a tan
  1. mp83
  2. i need a tan
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: Wisconsin, United States
  5. Posts: 12,073
  6. Rep Power: 97658
The covidiots don't believe in science, anyway. They're people who barely passed high school science class who think they know more about a subject than people who have spent their lives studying the subject. It's arrogance at its highest
{Misc Fisherman Crew}
{Misc Investing Crew}
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts