Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Planet twice the size of earth mostly made of diamond
  1. Results 31 to 35 of 35
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
post 1628350013 01-12-2021, 11:04 AM
-
#31
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By thedarrenestes
Twice the size would mean at least twice the gravity - probably more since "mostly" diamond is far more dense than "mostly" rock

Srs question, could an avg human walk against 2x gravity? Is that just 1G? Forgive ignorance
Actually if the planet is 8 times as massive as earth at 2x the radius, the density would be about on par with earth, since volume scales with the cube of radius.

Wikipedia however lists a slightly different value for radius, 1.875 earth radius, but also with a mass of about 8 earth masses (density would still be close to being on par). So you would weigh 8/(1.875^2) = 2.28 times as much on the exoplanet than earth, if those stats are accurate.

Interestingly, the wiki article seems to say that it’s not even really certain what the characteristics of this exoplanet are yet, and whether its composition includes a large chunk of diamond- it may, but it appears this is not totally known. Better to see what the science is actually saying than go by sensationalist articles.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1628350233 01-12-2021, 11:05 AM
-
#32
  1. MrRedFace
  2. Registered User
  1. MrRedFace
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Posts: 86
  5. Rep Power: 301
hello, inflation
post 1628352253 01-12-2021, 11:31 AM
-
#33
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 43,319
  6. Rep Power: 219409
Originally Posted By numberguy12
No, you are not taking into account relativity. Sure, from the perspective of someone back on earth your trip will take a super long time to cross the galaxy- longer than anyone’s lifespan- even if you are traveling at near the speed of light.

But I saidfrom your perspectivein that post, as in from the perspective of you on this hypothetical spaceship. Time dilates and length contracts for fast moving vehicles. If you are moving at a velocity v with respect to someone, to get the proper time in your frame of a trip that they time to be t, you will use the correction factor sqrt[1-v^2/c^2] to get t*sqrt[1-v^2/c^2]. Notice that as v gets arbitrarily close to c, that factor sqrt[1-v^2/c^2] gets arbitrarily small.

You could theoretically travel across the entire galaxy in a few seconds....if the speed was close enough to the speed of light [it would have to be ultra close].
brb creating a ship that is 99.9999999999999999% the speed of light
positivity brah crew
dont take my posts too srs crew srs
JFL @ everything crew
lol @ tradies srs crew
BIG LOL @ sky tradies srs crew (RealAesthetic)
indian crew
living in clown world crew so screw it crew
anti-degen crew
post 1628352623 01-12-2021, 11:35 AM
-
#34
  1. niospecv
  2. I mean yeah...
  1. niospecv
  2. I mean yeah...
  3. Join Date: Mar 2006
  4. Posts: 38,152
  5. Rep Power: 214442
Jeff Bezos will get there before Elon Musk and sell them on Amazon.
**Texas Crew**
**Ultra MAGA Crew**
**Pure Blood Crew**
**Dallas Cowboys Fan Crew**
post 1628421503 01-12-2021, 10:56 PM
-
#35
  1. thedarrenestes
  2. Country ass chit
  1. thedarrenestes
  2. Country ass chit
  3. Join Date: Oct 2013
  4. Posts: 3,862
  5. Rep Power: 69127
Originally Posted By sooby
The average human would probably struggle because they are unfit, weak, and fat af. But with proper training and adaptations they could. If you are 185 lbs, picture walking around with a barbell that is that same weight (might be easier than this due to weight distribution). Most people with a year or two of serious strength training could probably do this.

Studies in mice have shown in a 2G environment, muscle and bone mass increase to adapt to that new environment

also 3900 degrees on that planet, nothxjeff
Wasnt sure it'd be as simple as having another X bodyweight on your back if gravity was affecting each atom directly but would make sense it might even be easier since distributed evenly
Originally Posted By numberguy12
Actually if the planet is 8 times as massive as earth at 2x the radius, the density would be about on par with earth, since volume scales with the cube of radius.

Wikipedia however lists a slightly different value for radius, 1.875 earth radius, but also with a mass of about 8 earth masses (density would still be close to being on par).So you would weigh 8/(1.875^2) = 2.28 times as much on the exoplanet than earth, if those stats are accurate.
So 265x2.28 = 604.2lbs

...bruh
Originally Posted By numberguy12
Interestingly, the wiki article seems to say that it’s not even really certain what the characteristics of this exoplanet are yet, and whether its composition includes a large chunk of diamond- it may, but it appears this is not totally known.Better to see what the science is actually saying than go by sensationalist articles.
Oh good because i was struggling with my trig calculations on relaunching back off Planet Solitaire with my 600lb life and payload of mined diamonds
NASCAR American
HA
LVIIILLIAN
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts