Bridgerton TV Show Netflix's most popular show to date (srs)

01-28-2021, 03:45 AM

-

#1

IronBrahh
Registered User

IronBrahh
Registered User

Join Date: May 2015

Age: 32

Posts: 7,588

Rep Power: 31635

Bridgerton TV Show Netflix's most popular show to date (srs)

https://deadline.com/2021/01/bridger...er-1234681242/

The final numbers are in, and Season 1 of Bridgerton was watched by a record 82 million households around the world (partially or in its entirety.) That is a whopping 19M households higher than the four-week projection Netflix issued 10 days into the Shondaland series’ run (63 million), at the time the streamer’s fifth biggest launch in history.

Bridgerton, whose massive wave of popularity is showing no signs of subsiding, is now Netflix’s biggest series ever by a wide margin. It pushed down to No.2 previous record holder, fantasy hit The Witcher (76M in its first 28 days).

guess we found where The Bachelor viewers went

01-28-2021, 03:48 AM

-

#2

SomaliGirl
the captain

SomaliGirl
the captain

Join Date: Jan 2015

Posts: 7,071

Rep Power: 73858

inb4 muh agenduh

01-28-2021, 03:58 AM

-

#3

RollingStones
No longer goodlooking

RollingStones
No longer goodlooking

Join Date: Aug 2015

Posts: 7,767

Rep Power: 18610

Originally Posted By ****liGirl⏩

inb4 muh agenduh

show bobs and vagene

01-28-2021, 04:02 AM

-

#4

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 47,761

Rep Power: 284006

Originally Posted By ****liGirl⏩

inb4 muh agenduh

Obviously an agenda.

Netflix forced 82 million people to watch it.

01-28-2021, 04:10 AM

-

#5

IronBrahh
Registered User

IronBrahh
Registered User

Join Date: May 2015

Age: 32

Posts: 7,588

Rep Power: 31635

Originally Posted By hoganrulz⏩

Obviously an agenda.

Netflix forced 82 million people to watch it.

where my mandatory viewing i gotta pad the stats

01-28-2021, 04:14 AM

-

#6

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 47,761

Rep Power: 284006

Originally Posted By IronBrahh⏩

where my mandatory viewing i gotta pad the stats

I've had Netflix in the past and I have no idea wtf mandatory viewing is

01-28-2021, 04:31 AM

-

#7

AwkwardRetard
Strong username

AwkwardRetard
Strong username

Join Date: Jun 2011

Age: 39

Posts: 4,544

Rep Power: 35400

she wants early 1800s BBC.

01-28-2021, 04:44 AM

-

#8

Rad203
Registered User

Rad203
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2013

Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)

Posts: 2,304

Rep Power: 5808

Originally Posted By hoganrulz⏩

Obviously an agenda.

Netflix forced 82 million people to watch it.

Well it does have a agenda, its woke. I was reading a BBC article on it earlier today, it didn't tell me anything about the plot or why its good, all it really said to sell it to me is how “progressive” it is, specifically as it casts black people instead of White english people in a (historical) drama in early 1800s England.

01-28-2021, 04:52 AM

-

#9

PenorBrahNoHomo
R1b

PenorBrahNoHomo
R1b

Join Date: Aug 2011

Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)

Posts: 28,218

Rep Power: 130149

Originally Posted By Rad203⏩

Well it does have a agenda, its woke. I was reading a BBC article on it earlier today, it didn't tell me anything about the plot or why its good, all it really said to sell it to me is how “progressive” it is, specifically as it casts black people instead of White english people in a (historical) drama in early 1800s England.

It's objectively terrible

01-28-2021, 04:53 AM

-

#10

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 47,761

Rep Power: 284006

Originally Posted By Rad203⏩

Well it does have a agenda, its woke. I was reading a BBC article on it earlier today, it didn't tell me anything about the plot or why its good, all it really said to sell it to me is how “progressive” it is, specifically as it casts black people instead of White english people in a (historical) drama in early 1800s England.

UK had black people in the late 1800s that were either baptised and "free" or semi slaves.

Apparently tokenism was a big thing in high society.

I'm just assuming that's what the tv show is about.

01-28-2021, 04:54 AM

-

#11

PenorBrahNoHomo
R1b

PenorBrahNoHomo
R1b

Join Date: Aug 2011

Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)

Posts: 28,218

Rep Power: 130149

Originally Posted By hoganrulz⏩

UK had black people in the late 1800s that were either baptised and "free" or semi slaves.

Apparently tokenism was a big thing in high society.

I'm just assuming that's what the tv show is about.

It's not, it's a complete alternate reality

01-28-2021, 05:02 AM

-

#12

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 47,761

Rep Power: 284006

Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩

It's not, it's a complete alternate reality

But then what agenda is it propagating? Its a fictional TV show.

Is this not like saying game of thrones is propagating an agenda of midgets being cunning?

01-28-2021, 05:07 AM

-

#13

Rad203
Registered User

Rad203
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2013

Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)

Posts: 2,304

Rep Power: 5808

Originally Posted By hoganrulz⏩

UK had black people in the late 1800s that were either baptised and "free" or semi slaves.

Apparently tokenism was a big thing in high society.

I'm just assuming that's what the tv show is about.

While ethnic minorities existed in the UK in these times, they were a absolutely tiny amount (even london was 99% homogeneous in the early 1800s). Black people in the Aristocracy was almost non-existent which is what this series is about apparently.

Im not denying black people existed in the UK at this period i just dislike the reason the shows obviously being praised and is on netflix, as they love the idea of making European history woke with intentional less white people.

01-28-2021, 05:08 AM

-

#14

SPP1
Registered User

SPP1
Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2009

Posts: 6,590

Rep Power: 165200

Never saw it. Would have guessed The Cabin was the most watched. That Brice Kirscher is hysterical. I think he's also on the Big Show airing now on TBS...

01-28-2021, 05:18 AM

-

#15

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 47,761

Rep Power: 284006

Originally Posted By misctrader⏩

Why is it never with ****** and Ling then? srs

The UK had 2x more Asians than Africans

According to what I just read, in the 19th century numbers of ****** and lings were 1000-2500 (each) compared to 10-15000 Africans & 15-20000 Jewish people.

Originally Posted By Rad203⏩

While ethnic minorities existed in the UK in these times, they were a absolutely tiny amount (even london was 99% homogeneous in the early 1800s). Black people in the Aristocracy was almost non-existent which is what this series is about apparently.

Im not denying black people existed in the UK at this period i just dislike the reason the shows obviously being praised and is on netflix, as they love the idea of making European history woke with intentional less white people.

I can't really comment in terms of "less intentional white people" since I dont know if the show centers around 1 black family or 14, but, since its fictional and the premise of a black family in England isn't factually incorrect......

Also important to note.....its fiction.

This isn't like, black achilles or some chit.

01-28-2021, 05:24 AM

-

#16

potbellymadar
Registered User

potbellymadar
Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2011

Location: United States

Posts: 12,217

Rep Power: 74024

Originally Posted By hoganrulz⏩

But then what agenda is it propagating? Its a fictional TV show.

Is this not like saying game of thrones is propagating an agenda of midgets being cunning?

01-28-2021, 05:28 AM

-

#17

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 47,761

Rep Power: 284006

Originally Posted By misctrader⏩

Broadly speaking an agenda doesn't only mean a certain period in time. The demographic patterns of what they are constantly showing on TV VS what they are in the country are completely different.

And it seems to be only one way.

An agenda insinuates something is deliberately falsified for the purposes of propagating a view point.

A black family in 19th century London is not.

01-28-2021, 05:49 AM

-

#18

Rad203
Registered User

Rad203
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2013

Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)

Posts: 2,304

Rep Power: 5808

Originally Posted By hoganrulz⏩

According to what I just read, in the 19th century numbers of ****** and lings were 1000-2500 (each) compared to 10-15000 Africans & 15-20000 Jewish people.

I can't really comment in terms of "less intentional white people" since I dont know if the show centers around 1 black family or 14, but, since its fictional and the premise of a black family in England isn't factually incorrect......

Also important to note.....its fiction.

This isn't like, black achilles or some chit.

Look if some leftie thinks is good television good for them, but can you not see my point about what my problem is?

Also its not just one character they change a lot of things apparently its worse than i thought (they made the queen at the time african lmao)

Imagine if they did a “historical drama” set in china or whatever and they made the emperor white how stupid would that look.

01-28-2021, 05:50 AM

-

#19

PenorBrahNoHomo
R1b

PenorBrahNoHomo
R1b

Join Date: Aug 2011

Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)

Posts: 28,218

Rep Power: 130149

Originally Posted By hoganrulz⏩

An agenda insinuates something is deliberately falsified for the purposes of propagating a view point.

A black family in 19th century London is not.

It's not just a black family in London

Originally Posted By Rad203⏩

Look if some leftie thinks is good television good for them, but can you not see my point about what my problem is?

Also its not just one character they change a lot of things apparently its worse than i thought (they made the queen at the time african lmao)

Imagine if they did a “historical drama” set in china or whatever and they made the emperor white how stupid would that look.

Much of it was just softcore interracial porn srs

Might as well have called it Blackedgerton

01-28-2021, 05:52 AM

-

#20

SomaliGirl
the captain

SomaliGirl
the captain

Join Date: Jan 2015

Posts: 7,071

Rep Power: 73858

Originally Posted By Uhyeahokay⏩

It's an Emily Dickinson, Jane Austen rip off for smooth brain idiots that like pretty dresses and English accents. They used POC as actors, yay! While ignoring the fact that high society of the time exploited POC, it's like the East Indian Company never existed in this society. It's funny how woke yet incredibly offensive it is all at the same time.

it's not a documentary boyo

show is chit tho

01-28-2021, 06:00 AM

-

#21

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 47,761

Rep Power: 284006

I can't quote your guys posts for some reason but obv a couple of points before I have some lunch & go out are:

1) Its fiction.

2) its fiction

3) It doesn't matter if it doesn't represent western society because Netflix is global & 82 million people watched it so whatever they're doing its obv a winning recipe considering it even seems like you two brahs have seen the tv show.

4) its fiction.

01-28-2021, 06:11 AM

-

#22

muscle beast
Registered User

muscle beast
Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2006

Posts: 6,194

Rep Power: 29984

You guys are no different than the softies who get triggered by other dumb siht.

It's a TV show, not real life. I like it and will watch next season. It's not rocket science. If you're into that genre of TV show, you'll like Bridgerton, If you're not, you won't. Simple...

01-28-2021, 06:14 AM

-

#23

Rad203
Registered User

Rad203
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2013

Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)

Posts: 2,304

Rep Power: 5808

Originally Posted By hoganrulz⏩

I can't quote your guys posts for some reason but obv a couple of points before I have some lunch & go out are:

1) Its fiction.

2) its fiction

3) It doesn't matter if it doesn't represent western society because Netflix is global & 82 million people watched it so whatever they're doing its obv a winning recipe considering it even seems like you two brahs have seen the tv show.

4) its fiction.

Saying its fiction is just a cop out. It being a made up story does not change the fact its set in a historical setting and changes things purely for the woke factor like making the queen black or there being african nobles in england or whatever.

Would it be okay then if we made a civil war drama which featured at times historical figures, like confederate generals robert e lee, portrayed by a black dude or the confederate army full of women and minorities? No because that is retarded and clearly never happened.

However its fine when its done in reverse. (especially in the UK which never had significant numbers of slaves on its shores).

01-28-2021, 06:15 AM

-

#24

Ed_Norton_fan
Registered User

Ed_Norton_fan
Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2009

Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Age: 36

Posts: 4,229

Rep Power: 5187

Never heard of it, gets a 7.3 on IMDB - that's awful for a tv series

01-28-2021, 06:18 AM

-

#25

SultanofBling
Mean & Green

SultanofBling
Mean & Green

Join Date: Aug 2020

Posts: 6,968

Rep Power: 17762

Watching that show with my missus and her ma was awkward

Expected the "purists" to cry foul over the actors/racialist narrative, that's a classic. Show's fictional and doesn't attempt to come close to a historical drama or an accurate depiction of the time period, so JFL at ppl saying it's a "woke" narrative. It's more "Pride & Prejudice" with sex scenes that are -- honestly, too frequent and go on too long for my family viewing lmao.

Superstore is an excellent example of a Netflix show that handles the present cultural narrative and subverts expectations

01-28-2021, 06:28 AM

-

#26

SultanofBling
Mean & Green

SultanofBling
Mean & Green

Join Date: Aug 2020

Posts: 6,968

Rep Power: 17762

Originally Posted By Sophus⏩

To the people saying it's fiction, it doesn't change that there's an underlying agenda

Just like when they made Yesterday about the Beatles if their music could only be written and played by a ****** or when they made Hamilton the musical about Alexander Hamilton except everyone's black

It's a Shonda Rhimes production.

Its popularity is the same as the Gray's Anatomy recipe: take some setting, insert relationship drama and gratuitous amounts of sex = profit from your viewers.

Bridgerton is not a serious stab at a Imperial English setting just as Gray's isn't a serious stab at a Medical Drama.

01-28-2021, 07:34 AM

-

#27

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

hoganrulz
mreatassbtchslapr

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 47,761

Rep Power: 284006

Originally Posted By Rad203⏩

Saying its fiction is just a cop out. It being a made up story does not change the fact its set in a historical setting and changes things purely for the woke factor like making the queen black or there being african nobles in england or whatever.

Would it be okay then if we made a civil war drama which featured at times historical figures, like confederate generals robert e lee, portrayed by a black dude or the confederate army full of women and minorities? No because that is retarded and clearly never happened.

However its fine when its done in reverse. (especially in the UK which never had significant numbers of slaves on its shores).

If they made the queen black (im just assuming the queen is a queen that actually existed) then that's fukn ridiculous.

But, your example isn't viable here because the black guys character actually didn't exist (I assume) as a white guy or at all, historically speaking, like your Robert e Lee example. Thus, fiction.