Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Is the Hobbit Trilogy worth watching?
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 44
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Last
post 1630174483 01-31-2021, 09:13 AM
-
#1
  1. Ripper908
  2. Registered User
  1. Ripper908
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2010
  4. Location: Ontario, Canada
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 6,603
  7. Rep Power: 55969

Is the Hobbit Trilogy worth watching?

Remembering trying to watch the first one when it first came out and I couldn't make it all the way through because I was expecting it to be true to the novel.

I want to see Smaug phuck **** up though

Bored during lockdown so me and the mrs are debating giving it a go today
Stats: 6 foot, 240 pounds
Cane Corso Crew
post 1630174573 01-31-2021, 09:15 AM
-
#2
  1. SmillironS
  2. Registered User
  1. SmillironS
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: South Dakota
  5. Age: 41
  6. Height: 6'8"
  7. Weight: 350 lbs
  8. Posts: 11,296
  9. Subscribers: 2
  10. Rep Power: 189689
Yes, it’s only bad if you expect LOTR levels of greatness. Think of it completely independent to LOTR and you’ll enjoy it.
post 1630174603 01-31-2021, 09:15 AM
-
#3
  1. 2RDEYE
  2. Unregistered User
  1. 2RDEYE
  2. Unregistered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 36,111
  6. Rep Power: 92424
it's total ass

i loved the novel and the movies destroyed my image of the novel lol

it's good B rated entertainment
There is only one Hell: the one we live in now.
post 1630174753 01-31-2021, 09:17 AM
-
#4
  1. rkesh88
  2. Registered User
  1. rkesh88
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: New York, United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 676
  7. Rep Power: 1419
Does the extended edition add anything like how they did for lotr?
::88 Crew::
post 1630175263 01-31-2021, 09:25 AM
-
#5
  1. DrewDarden
  1. DrewDarden
  2. Join Date: Nov 2016
  3. Posts: 23,051
  4. Subscribers: 5
  5. Rep Power: 510742
Originally Posted By SmillironS
Yes, it’s only bad if you expect LOTR levels of greatness. Think of it completely independent to LOTR and you’ll enjoy it.
There may be some truth to the idea that there’s a certain feeling of being let down because it’s not nearly as good as the Lord of the Rings movies. But that’s only a part of it.

The biggest problem with The Hobbit is that it was just one normal sized book.

One reason Lord of the Rings was so great was because they had so much material to work with to make it a great world/story. Of course they tried to cash in the same way with The Hobbit and make it a trilogy, when it should’ve just been one film. So what I’m getting at is, if Lord of the Rings had never existed, this still would have been a fail on its own merits.
Misc Lifting Crew (Team Lead)
post 1630175423 01-31-2021, 09:27 AM
-
#6
  1. MrQuint
  2. Registered User
  1. MrQuint
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 5,985
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 72999
Didn’t care for the movies except for a few isolated scenes. Smaug and Bilbo talking in the Lonely Mountain was pretty good imo
Here's to swimmin' with bow-legged women.
Vybz Kartel crew
post 1630175463 01-31-2021, 09:27 AM
-
#7
  1. CuttyUnderleaf
  2. Unregistered User
  1. CuttyUnderleaf
  2. Unregistered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2020
  4. Posts: 6,205
  5. Rep Power: 182033
100% Worth it.


But the CGI is a little much, especially on the faces. Some of the characters look like a beauty filter from Instagram was applied to their faces.
post 1630176503 01-31-2021, 09:43 AM
-
#8
  1. WoofieNugget
  1. WoofieNugget
  2. Join Date: Jun 2010
  3. Age: 51
  4. Posts: 24,115
  5. Rep Power: 109783
CGI is terrible and it sucks compared to LOTR, but the dragon is pretty epic and so is the final battle, even if the cheese factor is high and there are lots of cringe worthy moments.
post 1630176743 01-31-2021, 09:47 AM
-
#9
  1. railgunner22
  2. Registered User
  1. railgunner22
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2008
  4. Posts: 6,467
  5. Rep Power: 8458
fuk yes it is
post 1630177023 01-31-2021, 09:50 AM
-
#10
  1. aceroa
  2. Aztec Warrior
  1. aceroa
  2. Aztec Warrior
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: Cuidad Azteca, Mexico
  5. Posts: 8,830
  6. Rep Power: 31816
Yeah I think it's definitely worth watching.
It's not as good as the LOTR trilogy, but it's still pretty damn good.
Mexican Crew
post 1630177723 01-31-2021, 10:01 AM
-
#11
  1. EasternHammer
  2. Registered User
  1. EasternHammer
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2009
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 1,754
  6. Rep Power: 7913
I thought it was terrible. The first episode was just ok but two and three just descended into absurd bull****.
post 1630178143 01-31-2021, 10:07 AM
-
#12
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  1. IronFeta
  2. Preregistered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Posts: 15,572
  5. Rep Power: 95979
Yes it has some good moments and is mostly enjoyable except for a few parts, but don't expect it to be too similar to or nearly as good as the book, plot wise or thematically. That dampened my first viewing of it. Martin Freeman does a great Bilbo and Ian McKellen as Gandalf alone is worth it.
post 1630178233 01-31-2021, 10:09 AM
-
#13
  1. IlChosenOne
  2. Biggest loads in the NW
  1. IlChosenOne
  2. Biggest loads in the NW
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Location: Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 20,788
  6. Rep Power: 259729
I liked them
* Rawdog crew * Creampie crew * Poverty crew *

Haven't worn a condom since middle school crew

* HTC crew *
post 1630178893 01-31-2021, 10:18 AM
-
#14
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Posts: 73,334
  6. Rep Power: 713784
Post deleted by user
Original Ruckus
post 1630179203 01-31-2021, 10:22 AM
-
#15
  1. freshnevafrozen
  2. Got That Sack
  1. freshnevafrozen
  2. Got That Sack
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Posts: 6,078
  5. Rep Power: 12838
It's a little bloated at 3 movies. And it did take me a few watches to really get into it. I hated it at first because I wanted LOTR part 4-6. Just go into it with a clear mind and no massive expectations and you'll enjoy the ride
Eagles/Leafs
post 1630181163 01-31-2021, 10:49 AM
-
#16
  1. wasp9166
  2. straight out da bronx
  1. wasp9166
  2. straight out da bronx
  3. Join Date: Nov 2008
  4. Location: NY
  5. Posts: 52,656
  6. Subscribers: 3
  7. Rep Power: 512586
Yes
post 1630181203 01-31-2021, 10:51 AM
-
#17
  1. nics1246
  2. ★Steel Reinforced★
  1. nics1246
  2. ★Steel Reinforced★
  3. Join Date: Jul 2005
  4. Posts: 12,318
  5. Rep Power: 2147729
Originally Posted By railgunner22
fuk yes it is
This^^^
post 1630181533 01-31-2021, 10:56 AM
-
#18
  1. soaponarope1
  2. 6'2" 227
  1. soaponarope1
  2. 6'2" 227
  3. Join Date: Jun 2016
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Age: 40
  6. Posts: 13,552
  7. Rep Power: 63078
Not terrible, most of the CGI scenes (like when they escape in barrels) are flat out awful. I think you could probably sit down and read the entire book in the same amount of time it would take to watch the movies so as others have said they are a bit stretched.

Other than the laughable CGI they are decent.
post 1630182303 01-31-2021, 11:07 AM
-
#19
  1. poolshark472
  2. Registered User
  1. poolshark472
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 14,120
  6. Rep Power: 47214
Originally Posted By DrewDarden
There may be some truth to the idea that there’s a certain feeling of being let down because it’s not nearly as good as the Lord of the Rings movies. But that’s only a part of it.

The biggest problem with The Hobbit is that it was just one normal sized book.

One reason Lord of the Rings was so great was because they had so much material to work with to make it a great world/story. Of course they tried to cash in the same way with The Hobbit and make it a trilogy, when it should’ve just been one film. So what I’m getting at is, if Lord of the Rings had never existed, this still would have been a fail on its own merits.
i refuse to watch the hobbit because of this. such an obvious scheme to make lots of money because of the success of LOTR.
post 1630182603 01-31-2021, 11:13 AM
-
#20
  1. untranslatedZA
  2. Registered User
  1. untranslatedZA
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2012
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 4,571
  6. Rep Power: 8471
Its very pretty and the extended versions actually add to the move (whereas LOTR 1 and 2 the extended takes away for me by being too humorous)

Go in with the mindset that the hobbit movie was more geared for children of those who were in their 20s when LOTR first came out. So you dont get the same suspense and sense of danger until the last movie (where the children would be a little older - similar to how the Harry Potter movies "aged" with the audience in terms of content).

Visually I think its superb though some feel they used too much CGI.
Athletics > Aesthetics
I guess its time to start training again.
- No longer in a long term relationship crew because sloots gun sloot.
- Finishing a degree at age 30 crew
post 1630183383 01-31-2021, 11:24 AM
-
#21
  1. Mr.PissShivers
  2. Shiverin' since '92
  1. Mr.PissShivers
  2. Shiverin' since '92
  3. Join Date: Nov 2009
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 39,118
  6. Rep Power: 305683
No.


OLD MOVIE CREW
post 1630183473 01-31-2021, 11:26 AM
-
#22
  1. BeginnerGainz
  2. Registered User
  1. BeginnerGainz
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 10,142
  6. Rep Power: 46984
It wasn’t bad.
Age: 30

"If I have seen further than others, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants"
-Sir Isaac Newton
post 1630183833 01-31-2021, 11:32 AM
-
#23
  1. VoxExMachina
  2. Mod Squad
  1. VoxExMachina
  2. Mod Squad
  3. Join Date: May 2009
  4. Posts: 26,350
  5. Rep Power: 2147695
Depends. If you read the books or expect LoTR quality, then it's hot trash. If not, then they're probably passable.

Jackson & Co. got greedy and full of themselves and tried to milk the Hobbit by turning it into 3 movies and adding a lot of their own nonsensical bloat. Should have been one movie, and done to LoTR standards.
☠ By reading this post, you have agreed to my negative reputation terms of service.
post 1630183953 01-31-2021, 11:33 AM
-
#24
  1. Archangel_Lost
  2. Attention K-Mart shoppers
  1. Archangel_Lost
  2. Attention K-Mart shoppers
  3. Join Date: Aug 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 58,036
  6. Rep Power: 148333
I’m a pretty big Tolkien fan and I just watched them for the first time last week. I was expecting to dislike it, so wasn’t expecting much

Aaand was about as much ass as I expected. The worst issue was the fake as ****, SUUUPER overused CGI. It looks so horrible. I’m rewatching the original trilogy and I’m speechless wondering how the quality in visuals dipped so much.

Acting wise it wasn’t bad. Seemed like a lot of fanservice stuff was in it though. Tauriel was a pointless addition but at least her character was ok, Legolas was just completely unnecessary.

I don’t regret watching it, it was entertaining enough to finish, but I’ll never rewatch it.
Lifts:
Squat: 460x1
Bench: 400x1
Deadlift: 575x1
OHP: 250x2
Weight: 180 lbs.

Don't have heroes; look up to no one. Because as long as someone's leading the way, the best you'll ever be is second.
post 1630185103 01-31-2021, 11:49 AM
-
#25
  1. hoganrulz
  2. mreatassbtchslapr
  1. hoganrulz
  2. mreatassbtchslapr
  3. Join Date: Feb 2007
  4. Posts: 47,761
  5. Rep Power: 284006
Yes
Formerly HandBrah, LipBrah & FootBrah
they call me Don Taters
NYM
<3 Miami Dolphins
WE GONNA WIN THE FUKING SUPERBOWL SOON BAYBEH
Hala Madrid
££££££sports betting crew££££££
This is all OJ's fault
Ass cheeks are the titties of the ass
First I romance the pie maker, then I romance the pie
post 1630185933 01-31-2021, 12:00 PM
-
#26
  1. Wh1teDyn0mite
  2. Registered User
  1. Wh1teDyn0mite
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Location: Croydon, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 18,736
  7. Rep Power: 62758
Dog chit, Jackson came in very late basically because the studios blackmailed him about 'legacy'.

CGI ruined alot.

Pointless romance between Elf/Dwarf.

Legolas being a Ninja which doesn't align with how he was portrayed in the LOTR films.

Should have been 1 movie, studios got greedy.

One point they did do perfect was Thranduil.
1/4 Jamaican
1/4 Polish
1/4 Irish
1/4 Welsh
post 1630186013 01-31-2021, 12:01 PM
-
#27
  1. CementPizza
  2. Registered User
  1. CementPizza
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2002
  4. Posts: 49,096
  5. Rep Power: 271368
It's absolutely horrible. Don't waste a second on it. Jackson himself admits they really didn't even have a script when starting the movies.
R.I.P. Hector Bluntz
I am sex yor butt.
Sick Duck Crew.
Stroke crew
Mortal Enema Crew.
Intent to penetrate Crew.
https://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Kitchen-Dining-Potholders/zgbs/kitchen/678537011
post 1630186263 01-31-2021, 12:05 PM
-
#28
  1. VoxExMachina
  2. Mod Squad
  1. VoxExMachina
  2. Mod Squad
  3. Join Date: May 2009
  4. Posts: 26,350
  5. Rep Power: 2147695
Originally Posted By CementPizza
It's absolutely horrible. Don't waste a second on it. Jackson himself admits they really didn't even have a script when starting the movies.
Ironically, the script was there for them all along. They could have simply translated what Tokien wrote to the screen, instead of making up their own sh!t.
☠ By reading this post, you have agreed to my negative reputation terms of service.
post 1630187123 01-31-2021, 12:19 PM
-
#29
  1. BigDeeps01
  2. Registered User
  1. BigDeeps01
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 26,735
  6. Rep Power: 169715
I actually just re watched the entire extended trilogy on blu-ray recently. I will echo what others have said in that you should not go into it with LOTR expectations. LOTR is the goat to me and cannot be touched. I was also hoping for basically LOTR 2.0 the first few times I watched the Hobbit and was always a little disappointed

It's actually a trilogy I appreciate more now that I have watched it a few times. You still have fantastic music, amazing scenery and imagery, and the whole tale does still feel quite epic. Bilbo imo is actually a really great character, much more entertaining imo than Frodo in LOTR. The scenes with smaug and the riddle game with gollum are really entertaining. Some of the dwarves hold their own, Kili is really good, Dwalin Balin and Biffur pretty good. Gandalf is entertaining as always and they really nailed Thranduil

One thing to remember is that the hobbit is more of a children's book, so the movies do have a bit more of a childish and carefree feel than LOTR. I think it hurts them a bit especially in action / battle scenes where things just get a little too over the top. Especially in the battle of five armies, which IMO was set up.amazingly but just fell really flat. There is also a ton of CGI which can get annoying at times

The biggest issue people have is with the liberties they take with the story. There are a lot of things that are improvised that have no roots in the book at all. I think they had to do this to get 3 movies out of such a small.book. To me they work and they arent really that insulting, I think the improvs were done fairly well, but I can see how purists would get mad.

All in all it's a solid trilogy to spend a weekend watching. Give it a go with an open mind (I'd recommend the extended versions) and see how you feel
post 1630187253 01-31-2021, 12:22 PM
-
#30
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  1. AncientYouth
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 62
  6. Posts: 22,213
  7. Rep Power: 65479
Money Grab........1 small book does not = 3 long films

a few good scenes but the should have been 1 film
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. Last
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts