Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Can anyone explain why we should NOT tax the rich more?
  1. Results 31 to 60 of 94
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. Last
post 1630694383 02-06-2021, 08:55 AM
-
#31
  1. Shortfuze
  2. "Your one f*ck fantasy"
  1. Shortfuze
  2. "Your one f*ck fantasy"
  3. Join Date: Feb 2004
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 31,897
  6. Rep Power: 179945
What's your proposal OP? How would you like to tax the rich?

For reference, if my total annual income was $10,000,000 and I live in NYC, then my estimated Federal Income Tax that I would have to pay is about $5,000,000, which means I take home the remaining $5,000,000. Is it still too much or fair?

link:https://smartasset.com/taxes/income-taxes#OGyBHlYud1
*Simplicity is the key to life*

Thanks ZBlacktt for the mod rep!
Thanks ForumSentinel for the admin rep!
Thanks Gxp23 for the mod rep!
Thanks 400LB Gorilla for the mod rep!
Thanks CountryMike for admin rep!
Thanks Nics1246 for mod rep!

I got married on August 24, 2013!!
ლ(╹◡╹ლ)
post 1630694573 02-06-2021, 08:59 AM
-
#32
  1. SimpIeJack
  2. Banned
  1. SimpIeJack
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2021
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 909
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Shortfuze
What's your proposal OP? How would you like to tax the rich?

For reference, if my total annual income was $10,000,000 and I live in NYC, then my estimated Federal Income Tax that I would have to pay is about $5,000,000, which means I take home the remaining $5,000,000. Is it still too much or fair?

link:https://smartasset.com/taxes/income-taxes#OGyBHlYud1
That's for ordinary income which as the posters above of you aresofond of reminding me, is not generally the type of income recognized by the rich. Taxes on capital gains and qualified dividends are 20% maximum (federal rate). So with 10m of investment income I only pay $2m tax, not $5m.

Even better, by holding and not selling my appreciated stock I can defer capital gains tax indefinitely. Then when I die and pass on those investments to my kids, they get a step up in basis which deletes all that capital gains tax.

So the only person paying a 50% tax is the guy working for a living. With investments you pay a much lower tax rate.
post 1630694623 02-06-2021, 09:00 AM
-
#33
  1. SimpIeJack
  2. Banned
  1. SimpIeJack
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2021
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 909
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron
You rode the short bus to school, didn't you?
That's not a rebuttal
post 1630694743 02-06-2021, 09:03 AM
-
#34
  1. freshnevafrozen
  2. Got That Sack
  1. freshnevafrozen
  2. Got That Sack
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Posts: 6,078
  5. Rep Power: 12838
It makes sense for the wealthy to pay more to better society, to build infrastructure and elevate the lower earners out of poverty. That in turn cuts down crime and drug use. And also makes the country better in the future with more money being spent by these low income individuals. I have no idea how conservative values degraded toward propping up oligarchies in the west but here we are. Miscers making 60k a year max are upset when you say millionaires should be taxed more.
Eagles/Leafs
post 1630694843 02-06-2021, 09:05 AM
-
#35
  1. SimpIeJack
  2. Banned
  1. SimpIeJack
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2021
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 909
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By freshnevafrozen
It makes sense for the wealthy to pay more to better society, to build infrastructure and elevate the lower earners out of poverty. That in turn cuts down crime and drug use. And also makes the country better in the future with more money being spent by these low income individuals. I have no idea how conservative values degraded toward propping up oligarchies in the west but here we are. Miscers making 60k a year max are upset when you say millionaires should be taxed more.
Better yet billionaire think tanks have convinced them it's "impossible" to tax the rich more. It just simply can't be done.

Meanwhile raising taxes on the poor for over 50 years straight is not only possible, it's necessary.
post 1630695313 02-06-2021, 09:14 AM
-
#36
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Posts: 16,298
  5. Rep Power: 67825
Originally Posted By lockdev
Because the government will just squander it.

If they really want to make a difference, they should pass fair IP laws, enforce monopoly laws, eliminate laws that decrease competition, remove corrupt politicians from office, change the way lobbying is done in this country, and encourage a smaller government.

Just LOL@that in this country though. The US has been an oligarchy for quite some time. Higher taxes only feed the oligarchy.
Originally Posted By Anachron
Anyone who has any sort of substantial income makes it so as far as taxes are concerned, is not "income".
Originally Posted By wave_length
bingo. income tax means absolutely nothing to rich people.
/threadddd
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
post 1630695373 02-06-2021, 09:16 AM
-
#37
  1. NoHerro
  2. Registered User
  1. NoHerro
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2014
  4. Posts: 736
  5. Rep Power: 1338
I think a better idea is to reduce Government size/spending.
post 1630695383 02-06-2021, 09:16 AM
-
#38
  1. yewotm8
  2. Registered User
  1. yewotm8
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 17,781
  6. Rep Power: 50628
Do you want to have rich people or not? If not, how do you draw the line for "rich"? How can you ensure that line stays where it is, as the rich people lose their money/leave the country and you need new targets to take money from? How do you know you won't some day be the "rich" that is going to be getting taxed?
post 1630695443 02-06-2021, 09:16 AM
-
#39
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Posts: 16,298
  5. Rep Power: 67825
Originally Posted By SoutheastBeast1
Better question, why should those of you who are contributing a smaller percentage of your income to this country have your vote count as much as someone contributing a higher percentage of their income?

If you're only offering 15% of what you earn to this country, but someone else is offering 30% of what they earn to build and sustain this country, shouldn't that person's vote count twice as much as yours?

It's like investing half as much in a company but expecting equal voting rights at a shareholders meeting. That's entitlement. I'm all for taxing people differently if you'd like, but we should start weighting voting rights based on tax brackets if so. This would also at least slow the effectiveness of democrats flooding this country with immigrants to win over more votes every year.
JFL;

Completely unnecessary

Most of the time money makes money



as per lockdev's thinking passing good laws to allow motivated individuals to not be squashed by a scale that was there before they were even born



think about it if your father is a partner at a VC firm it is much easier to make money/start a business and be successful
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
post 1630695583 02-06-2021, 09:19 AM
-
#40
  1. wave_length
  2. Retired at 42
  1. wave_length
  2. Retired at 42
  3. Join Date: Dec 2008
  4. Location: Vienna, Austria
  5. Age: 53
  6. Posts: 18,041
  7. Rep Power: 68853
Tax laws create incentives. Rich people act upon them. If you overtax them, you will get diminishing returns because in this case the incentive is to move capital out of the country.
How to lose fat for Noobs: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=129247741
post 1630695773 02-06-2021, 09:23 AM
-
#41
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 49,580
  6. Rep Power: 0
Because taxing more is a slope you don’t want to go down, only idiots call for more taxes

Can you give me a good reason why we should give the inefficient government more tax money?
Dallas Cowboys

Lifted for 30 years

Ass > tits
No Debt Crew
post 1630695833 02-06-2021, 09:23 AM
-
#42
  1. SimpIeJack
  2. Banned
  1. SimpIeJack
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2021
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 909
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By 5x10
Because taxing more is a slope you don’t want to go down, only idiots call for more taxes

Can you give me a good reason why we should give the inefficient government more tax money?
Because we are $28 trillion in debt and accelerating?
post 1630695883 02-06-2021, 09:24 AM
-
#43
  1. Jasonw1178
  2. 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
  1. Jasonw1178
  2. 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 44,104
  5. Rep Power: 271274
What is it to achieve? Is it that you're mad someone makes a lot more than you? Do you think it solves a greater problem?

Trickle down economics doesn't work, but neither does wealth redistribution nor "make the rich pay".

I hear it a lot from the left. Tax the rich more for benefits to help "ALL PEOPLE'S" and it turns out they want to take the money and give it to people who already are getting their bills paid by the government. Now, why should I as a middle class working person want to something that may hurt the economy which will effect me so that those already getting a free ride can have an even better ride?

There is hardly no talk about how the middle class is taxed nearly 1/3rd of their income and have to pay for everything themselves.
post 1630695983 02-06-2021, 09:26 AM
-
#44
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 49,580
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By SimpIeJack
Because we are $28 trillion in debt and accelerating?
sounds like a spending problem
Dallas Cowboys

Lifted for 30 years

Ass > tits
No Debt Crew
post 1630696163 02-06-2021, 09:30 AM
-
#45
  1. BIGJIMSLADE22
  2. Registered User
  1. BIGJIMSLADE22
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,106
  6. Rep Power: 4616
Originally Posted By SimpIeJack
So you're saying the wealthiest people in the world have 0 (or minimal) income.
Bingo!! Any income simply gets deferred or put in trusts because unlike the middle class, the rich don’t need to live on paychecks.
post 1630696173 02-06-2021, 09:31 AM
-
#46
  1. turdburglar9021
  2. Registered User
  1. turdburglar9021
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Posts: 1,709
  5. Rep Power: 6847
Taxing the rich just doesn't have much of an impact, there's not that many of them. Truth is, small changes on the middle class have a bigger impact. Increasing taxes on the rich is just political/moral issue depending on how you look at it.

Moderate inflation (1-3%) is probably the most effective "tax" there is without people complaining too much and it's essentially hidden until you look back 10-15 years.
post 1630696293 02-06-2021, 09:32 AM
-
#47
  1. SimpIeJack
  2. Banned
  1. SimpIeJack
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2021
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 909
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By BIGJIMSLADE22
Bingo!! Any income simply gets deferred or put in trusts because unlike the middle class, the rich don’t need to live on paychecks.
You realize that income from a trust is still recognized as income, right? Trusts are still taxed, and often at a higher rate than other investment income.
post 1630696693 02-06-2021, 09:42 AM
-
#48
  1. helpmee
  2. Registered User
  1. helpmee
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2011
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 25,329
  6. Rep Power: 51912
I would be fine with looking into raising taxes across the board once they reduce government size drastically and work to cut waste and inefficiencies. Enough tax revenue is already collected x100. The budget should be reduced by 10% per year
**Black out tape over all laptop/cell phone cameras so gov cant spy on me fapping crew**
post 1630696983 02-06-2021, 09:48 AM
-
#49
  1. BalognaNbeans
  2. Registered User
  1. BalognaNbeans
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 35,319
  6. Rep Power: 312457
Because taxation is theft
post 1630697053 02-06-2021, 09:49 AM
-
#50
  1. SimpIeJack
  2. Banned
  1. SimpIeJack
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2021
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 909
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By BalognaNbeans
Because taxation is theft
So it's ok so long as we only steal from the poor people?
post 1630697303 02-06-2021, 09:54 AM
-
#51
  1. GrimRep_er
  2. The Dark Man
  1. GrimRep_er
  2. The Dark Man
  3. Join Date: Feb 2008
  4. Location: New Jersey, United States
  5. Posts: 11,736
  6. Rep Power: 89534
Originally Posted By wave_length
Tax laws create incentives. Rich people act upon them. If you overtax them, you will get diminishing returns because in this case the incentive is to move capital out of the country.
This. Why do you think after NAFTA was adopted businesses in the US moved to Mexico and other places. If you own a massive business is it more convenient to have products built on another continent and shipped back to the states? Hell no it's not. But the tax rates and red tape liberals love to champion make that inconvenient process more profitable then having a factory in Texas or NY.

When Trump lowered taxes and cut regulations what happened? The economy (pre kung-flu) was on fire. Unemployment was at historic lowes and the people he supposedly hated (blacks, Hispanics, ect) were at record rates of employment. Did the rich get richer? They did. And median incomes rose for ALL, from the bottom to the top. Our economy was growing faster then those of our friends and enemies.

Excessive taxes choke economic growth. It doesn't fix anything. It keeps the poor poor, and makes it more difficult for everyone else to climb the economic ladder.

I'm not rich, but I do pretty well. I also don't have a victim mentality. I am where I am based on things I did or didn't do. My younger brother is FAR wealthier then I am and I want him to keep as much of his earnings as possible. Success should be looked at with praise, not with jealousy and bitterness.

The liberal mentality when it comes to taxation is so backward looking. They want to use taxes as a form of punishment. It's wrong, unfair, and un-American.
USMC 95-2000

Do or do not, their is no try! (I made this up myself)
post 1630697353 02-06-2021, 09:55 AM
-
#52
  1. Adam16121
  2. Registered User
  1. Adam16121
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2017
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 20,009
  6. Rep Power: 314711
Originally Posted By SimpIeJack
So it's ok so long as we only steal from the poor people?
post 1630697363 02-06-2021, 09:55 AM
-
#53
  1. Jasonw1178
  2. 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
  1. Jasonw1178
  2. 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 44,104
  5. Rep Power: 271274
Originally Posted By 5x10
sounds like a spending problem
Right, there is a list of all the different kinds of taxes and when you add it up, the government already is taxing us on top of taxing us on top of taxing us. Why do they need more?
Originally Posted By turdburglar9021
Taxing the rich just doesn't have much of an impact, there's not that many of them. Truth is, small changes on the middle class have a bigger impact. Increasing taxes on the rich is just political/moral issue depending on how you look at it.
And the politicians know this. Funny how when they say something won't effect the middle class it ends up effecting us the most?

Meanwhile there are areas where there is gross profits being made across the board and the government allows it. Why do you think finance is such a good paying job. They have so much money flying around they make sure everyone involved is getting rich. Such as brokering a loan, does it really take that level of skill or amount of work to yield tens of thousands of dollars? Does a law office really need thousands of dollars to basically be in the middle of the sale of a house?
post 1630698073 02-06-2021, 10:07 AM
-
#54
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Posts: 16,298
  5. Rep Power: 67825
Originally Posted By Anachron
Say what?

The top 1% pays more taxes than the bottom 90% combined - and you think that is taxing only poor people?
whilst I agree with this, wouldn't it be fair to say that after paying the largest share of taxes you are left with still so much that you might call it a "distraction"; so one set of peasants, who are not that peasant on the peasant spectrum, fight the other peasants over it




no commie btw, I legit think this is the only solution:
Originally Posted By lockdev
Because the government will just squander it.

If they really want to make a difference, they should pass fair IP laws, enforce monopoly laws, eliminate laws that decrease competition, remove corrupt politicians from office, change the way lobbying is done in this country, and encourage a smaller government.

Just LOL@that in this country though. The US has been an oligarchy for quite some time. Higher taxes only feed the oligarchy.
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
post 1630698313 02-06-2021, 10:15 AM
-
#55
  1. basedcap
  2. Registered User
  1. basedcap
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 2,558
  6. Rep Power: 8439
we should tax them more but there has to be a smarter way of taxing them rather than just simple income tax which is way too easy to manipulate.
post 1630698443 02-06-2021, 10:18 AM
-
#56
  1. Fozzy13
  2. unregistered user
  1. Fozzy13
  2. unregistered user
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 38,659
  5. Rep Power: 41514
-Taxes need to be reviewed to close loopholes that benefit the rich/corporations.
n4l
Rayaarito
fappin
r32gojirra
post 1630698913 02-06-2021, 10:26 AM
-
#57
  1. wave_length
  2. Retired at 42
  1. wave_length
  2. Retired at 42
  3. Join Date: Dec 2008
  4. Location: Vienna, Austria
  5. Age: 53
  6. Posts: 18,041
  7. Rep Power: 68853
Originally Posted By basedcap
we should tax them more but there has to be a smarter way of taxing them rather than just simple income tax which is way too easy to manipulate.
Originally Posted By Fozzy13
-Taxes need to be reviewed to close loopholes that benefit the rich/corporations.
There are no loopholes. There are incentives.
You guys do realize that ultra rich people are needed for a great economy.
With higher taxes you will always only get the ones that are already paying all the taxes anyways.
How to lose fat for Noobs: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=129247741
post 1630699143 02-06-2021, 10:30 AM
-
#58
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Posts: 16,298
  5. Rep Power: 67825
Originally Posted By wave_length
There are no loopholes. There are incentives.
You guys do realize that ultra rich people are needed for a great economy.
With higher taxes you will always only get the ones that are already paying all the taxes anyways.
but also competition and scale need to be addressed

you can't become the next BMW family

their wealth can be traced from the war which the biggest wealth creator of hasn't been tried for


just more laws to give little guys a better chance
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
post 1630699623 02-06-2021, 10:36 AM
-
#59
  1. wave_length
  2. Retired at 42
  1. wave_length
  2. Retired at 42
  3. Join Date: Dec 2008
  4. Location: Vienna, Austria
  5. Age: 53
  6. Posts: 18,041
  7. Rep Power: 68853
Originally Posted By atgbrahsrs
but also competition and scale need to be addressed

you can't become the next BMW family

their wealth can be traced from the war which the biggest wealth creator of hasn't been tried for

just more laws to give little guys a better chance


https://www.businessinsider.com/elon...-bmw-i3-2013-8
How to lose fat for Noobs: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=129247741
post 1630699733 02-06-2021, 10:37 AM
-
#60
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 23,894
  6. Rep Power: 82068
Originally Posted By ExPatriot
It.will.never.happen.

The US tax code is complex by design to benefit the friends of the House and Senate and to encourage corporate investment...

https://review.chicagobooth.edu/publ...plify-tax-code
There's a whole white collar industry funded from the retardation that is the tax code, funded by the beneficiaries of the code.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts